A primer on the ethics of teaching and learning in airway management

Educational Effects of Simulation and Non-Simulation Training in Airway Management according to Levels of the Kirkpatrick Model: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

There is insufficient validation of the effectiveness of simulation-based training (Sim) or non-simulation-based training (non-Sim) for teaching airway management to healthcare professionals within the literature. We thus conducted a network meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of Sim, non-Sim, and no educational intervention (NI) for airway management. The primary endpoints were knowledge scores (KnS) and behavioral performance scores (BpS) corresponding to assessments at levels 2 and 3 of the Kirkpatrick model, respectively. Effect sizes were expressed as standardized mean differences (Std. MD) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs). Regarding KnS, the educational effects of Sim and non-Sim were significantly improved compared to those of NI (Std. MD [95% CI]: 1.110 [0.903–1.316] and 0.819 [0.209–1.429], respectively); there was no significant difference between Sim and non-Sim. The educational effect of Sim in BpS was significantly improved compared to that of non-Sim and NI (0.850 [0.015–1.691] and 0.660 [0.241–1.076]); there were no differences between non-Sim and NI. Surface under the cumulative rank curve values demonstrated that Sim ranked highest in efficacy for KnS and BpS. This study provides valuable information regarding the educational efficacy of Sim and non-Sim in airway management. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

A retrospective observational study of patient analgesia outcomes when regional anaesthesia procedures are performed by consultants versus supervised trainees

At teaching hospitals, consultants must provide effective supervision, including appropriate selection of teaching cases, such that the outcomes achieved by trainees are similar to that of consultants. Numerous studies in the surgical literature have compared patient outcomes when surgery is performed by consultant surgeons or surgical trainees but, to our knowledge, none exist in the field of anaesthesia. We aimed to compare analgesia outcomes of regional anaesthesia when performed by supervised trainees versus consultants. We designed a retrospective observational study using registry data. The primary outcome was inadequate analgesia, defined as a numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain >5 reported at any time in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU). Secondary outcomes included the maximum pain NRS, pain experienced in the PACU, and the requirement for systemic opioid analgesia in the PACU. Of the 1814 patients analysed, the primary proceduralist was a consultant for 514 (28.3%) patients and a trainee for 1300 (71.7%) patients. All trainees were supervised by an on-site consultant. There were no statistically significant differences between consultants and supervised trainees in terms of the primary outcome (NRS >5 in 24.9% and 24.5% of patients, respectively; P = 0.84) and secondary outcomes. Compared to trainees, consultants had a slightly higher rate of patients with a body mass index >30 kg/m², an American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification of 3 or 4, nerve blocks performed under general anaesthesia, paravertebral/neuraxial blocks and blocks with perineural catheter placement. Regional anaesthesia performed by supervised trainees can achieve similar analgesia outcomes to consultant-performed procedures.

Difficult airway management practice changes after introduction of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Introduction of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope caused a change in use of other devices for difficult airway management.

OBJECTIVE

The influence of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope on changes in the indications for and the frequency of use of flexible fibreoptic-assisted intubation and other difficult airway management techniques.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary care referral centre.

METHODS

Two periods of equal length (647 days each) before and after introducing the GlideScope were compared. Information about patients who were intubated using nondirect laryngoscopic techniques were analysed. Data were retrieved from the anaesthesia and hospital information management systems.

RESULTS

Difficult airway management techniques were used in 235/8306 (2.8%) patients before and in 480/8517 (5.6%) (P < 0.0001) patients after the introduction of the GlideScope. There was an overall 44.4% reduction in use of flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy after GlideScope introduction [before 149/8306 (1.8%); after 85/8517 (1.0%), P < 0.0001]. The GlideScope replaced flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy in most cases with expected and unexpected difficult intubation. In patients with limited mouth opening, flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy was still mostly the first choice after the introduction of the GlideScope. There was a 70% reduction in the use of other difficult intubation techniques after the introduction of the GlideScope [before 84/8306 (1.0%); after 22/8517 (0.3%), P < 0.0001)].

CONCLUSION

The GlideScope videolaryngoscope replaced flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy for most patients with expected and unexpected difficult intubation. In the case of limited mouth opening, flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy was still the first choice after the introduction of the GlideScope. The reduced use of flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy raises concerns that residents may not be adequately trained in this essential airway management technique. GlideScope use was disproportionately greater than the reduction in the use of flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy and other difficult intubation techniques. This may be attributed to resident teaching and use in patients with low-to-moderate suspicion of difficult intubation.

Preparation for and Management of “Failed” Laryngoscopy and/or Intubation

An airway manager’s primary objective is to provide a path to oxygenation. This can be achieved by means of a facemask, a supraglottic airway, or a tracheal tube. If one method fails, an alternative approach may avert hypoxia. We cannot always predict the difficulties with each of the methods, but these difficulties may be overcome by an alternative technique. Each unsuccessful attempt to maintain oxygenation is time lost and may incrementally increase the risk of hypoxia, trauma, and airway obstruction necessitating a surgical airway. We should strive to optimize each effort. Differentiation between failed laryngoscopy and failed intubation is important because the solutions differ. Failed facemask ventilation may be easily managed with an supraglottic airway or alternatively tracheal intubation. When alveolar ventilation cannot be achieved by facemask, supraglottic airway, or tracheal intubation, every anesthesiologist should be prepared to perform an emergency surgical airway to avert disaster.