Prognostic parameters and outcome after re-irradiation for progressive glioblastoma

Preferred Imaging for Target Volume Delineation for Radiotherapy of Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Literature Review of the Available Evidence

BACKGROUND

Recurrence in glioblastoma lacks a standardized treatment, prompting an exploration of re-irradiation's efficacy.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic review from January 2005 to May 2023 assessed the role of MRI sequences in recurrent glioblastoma re-irradiation. The search criteria, employing MeSH terms, targeted English-language, peer-reviewed articles. The inclusion criteria comprised both retrospective and prospective studies, excluding certain types and populations for specificity. The PICO methodology guided data extraction, and the statistical analysis employed Chi-squared tests via MedCalc v22.009.

RESULTS

Out of the 355 identified studies, 81 met the criteria, involving 3280 patients across 65 retrospective and 16 prospective studies. The key findings indicate diverse treatment modalities, with linac-based photons predominating. The median age at re-irradiation was 54 years, and the median time interval between radiation courses was 15.5 months. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences were favored for target delineation, with PET-imaging used in fewer studies. Re-irradiation was generally well tolerated (median G3 adverse events: 3.5%). The clinical outcomes varied, with a median 1-year local control rate of 61% and a median overall survival of 11 months. No significant differences were noted in the G3 toxicity and clinical outcomes based on the MRI sequence preference or PET-based delineation.

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of recurrent glioblastoma, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences were preferred for target delineation, allowing clinicians to deliver a safe and effective therapeutic option; amino acid PET imaging may represent a useful device to discriminate radionecrosis from recurrent disease. Future investigations, including the ongoing GLIAA, NOA-10, ARO 2013/1 trial, will aim to refine approaches and standardize methodologies for improved outcomes in recurrent glioblastoma re-irradiation.

A Systematic Review of Prognostic Factors in Patients with Cancer Receiving Palliative Radiotherapy: Evidence-Based Recommendations

(1) Background: Prognostication in patients with cancer receiving palliative radiotherapy remains a challenge. To improve the process, we aim to identify prognostic factors in this population from the literature and offer evidence-based recommendations on prognostication in patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy for non-curable or advanced cancers. (2) Methods: A systematic review was performed on the medical literature from 2005 to 2023 to extract papers on the prognosis of palliative radiotherapy patients with advanced cancer. The initial selection was performed by at least two authors to determine study relevance to the target area. Studies were then classified based on type and evidence quality to determine final recommendations. (3) Results: The literature search returned 57 papers to be evaluated. Clinical and biological prognostic factors were identified from these papers to improve clinical decision making or construct prognostic models. Twenty prognostic models were identified for clinical use. There is moderate evidence supporting (i) evidence-based factors (patient, clinical, disease, and lab) in guiding decision making around palliative radiation; (ii) that certain biological factors are of importance; (iii) prognostication models in patients with advanced cancer; and that (iv) SBRT or re-irradiation use can be guided by predictions of survival by prognostic scores or clinicians. Patients with more favorable prognoses are generally better suited to SBRT or re-irradiation, and the use of prognostic models can aid in this decision making. (4) Conclusions: This evaluation has identified several factors or tools to aid in prognosis and clinical decision making. Future studies should aim to further validate these tools and factors in a clinical setting, including the leveraging of electronic medical records for data availability. To increase our understanding of how causal factors interact with palliative radiotherapy, future studies should also examine and include prediction of response to radiation as an outcome.

Effects of Reoperation Timing on Survival among Recurrent Glioblastoma Patients: A Retrospective Multicentric Descriptive Study

Glioblastoma inevitably recurs, but no standard regimen has been established for treating this recurrent disease. Several reports claim that reoperative surgery can improve survival, but the effects of reoperation timing on survival have rarely been investigated. We, therefore, evaluated the relationship between reoperation timing and survival in recurrent GBM. A consecutive cohort of unselected patients (real-world data) from three neuro-oncology cancer centers was analyzed (a total of 109 patients). All patients underwent initial maximal safe resection followed by treatment according to the Stupp protocol. Those meeting the following criteria during progression were indicated for reoperation and were further analyzed in this study: (1) The tumor volume increased by >20-30% or a tumor was rediscovered after radiological disappearance; (2) The patient's clinical status was satisfactory (KS ≥ 70% and PS WHO ≤ gr. 2); (3) The tumor was localized without multifocality; (4) The minimum expected tumor volume reduction was above 80%. A univariate Cox regression analysis of postsurgical survival (PSS) revealed a statistically significant effect of reoperation on PSS from a threshold of 16 months after the first surgery. Cox regression models that stratified the Karnofsky score with age adjustment confirmed a statistically significant improvement in PSS for time-to-progression (TTP) thresholds of 22 and 24 months. The patient groups exhibiting the first recurrence at 22 and 24 months had better survival rates than those exhibiting earlier recurrences. For the 22-month group, the HR was 0.5 with a 95% CI of (0.27, 0.96) and a p-value of 0.036. For the 24-month group, the HR was 0.5 with a 95% CI of (0.25, 0.96) and a p-value of 0.039. Patients with the longest survival were also the best candidates for repeated surgery. Later recurrence of glioblastoma was associated with higher survival rates after reoperation.

Bevacizumab combined with re-irradiation in recurrent glioblastoma

Background

Glioblastoma is characterized by rich vasculature and abnormal vascular structure and function. Currently, there is no standard treatment for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). Bevacizumab (BEV) has established role of inhibiting neovascularization, alleviating hypoxia in the tumor area and activating the immune microenvironment. BEV may exert synergistic effects with re-irradiation (re-RT) to improve the tumor microenvironment for rGBM.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a combination of BEV and re-RT for rGBM treatment.

Methods

In this retrospective study, a total of 26 rGBM patients with surgical pathologically confirmed glioblastoma and at least one event of recurrence were enrolled. All patients were treated with re-RT in combination with BEV. BEV was administered until progression or serious adverse events.

Results

Median follow-up was 21.9 months for all patients, whereas median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.5–9.5 months). In addition, the 6-month and 1-year PFS rates were 65.4% and 28.2%, respectively. The median overall survival (OS), 6-month OS rate, and 1-year OS rate were 13.6 months (95% CI: 10.2–17.0 months), 92.3%, and 67.5%, respectively. The patient showed good tolerance during the treatment with no grade > 3 grade side event and radiation necrosis occurrence rate of 0%. Combined treatment of gross total resection (GTR) before re-RT and concurrent temozolomide during re-RT was an independent prognostic factor that affected both OS and PFS in the whole cohort (OS: 0.067, 95% CI: 0.009–0.521, p = 0.010; PFS: 0.238, 95% CI: 0.076–0.744, p = 0.038).

Conclusion

In this study, re-RT combined with concurrent and maintenance BEV treatment was safe, tolerable, and effective in rGBM patients. Moreover, GTR before re-RT and selective concurrent temozolomide could further improve patient PFS and OS.

Recurrent Glioblastoma Treatment: State of the Art and Future Perspectives in the Precision Medicine Era

Current treatment guidelines for the management of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) are far from definitive, and the prognosis remains dismal. Despite recent advancements in the pharmacological and surgical fields, numerous doubts persist concerning the optimal strategy that clinicians should adopt for patients who fail the first lines of treatment and present signs of progressive disease. With most recurrences being located within the margins of the previously resected lesion, a comprehensive molecular and genetic profiling of rGBM revealed substantial differences compared with newly diagnosed disease. In the present comprehensive review, we sought to examine the current treatment guidelines and the new perspectives that polarize the field of neuro-oncology, strictly focusing on progressive disease. For this purpose, updated PRISMA guidelines were followed to search for pivotal studies and clinical trials published in the last five years. A total of 125 articles discussing locoregional management, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy strategies were included in our analysis, and salient findings were critically summarized. In addition, an in-depth description of the molecular profile of rGBM and its distinctive characteristics is provided. Finally, we integrate the above-mentioned evidence with the current guidelines published by international societies, including AANS/CNS, EANO, AIOM, and NCCN.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of radiation therapy in the management of progressive and recurrent glioblastoma in adults

TARGET POPULATION

These recommendations apply to adult patients (18 years of age and above) with progressive/recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (pGBM) after first line combined multimodality treatment.

QUESTION

Can re-irradiation (by using conventional radiotherapy, fractionated radiosurgery, or single fraction radiosurgery) be used in patients with pGBM after the first adjuvant combined multimodality treatment with radiation and chemotherapy?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: When the target tumor is amenable for additional radiation, re-irradiation is recommended as it provides improved local tumor control, as measured by best imaging response. Such re-irradiation can take the form of conventional fractionation radiotherapy, fractionated radiosurgery, or single fraction radiosurgery.

LEVEL III

Re-Irradiation is recommended in order to maintain or improve a patient's neurological status and quality of life prior to any further tumor progression.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Management of Progressive Glioblastoma in Adults: Update of the 2014 Guidelines

BACKGROUND

The Institute of Medicine best practice recommendation to review guidelines every 5 years is followed by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons Guidelines Committee. The aim of this work was to provide an updated literature review and evidence-based recommendations on the topic of diagnosis and treatment of patients with progressive glioblastoma (pGBM).

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature published since the last guidelines on pGBM dated 2014, with literature search ending in June 2012.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for the period July 1, 2012, to March 31, 2019, using search terms and search strategies to identify pertinent abstracts. These were then screened using published exclusion/inclusion criteria to identify full-text review articles. Evidence tables were constructed using data derived from full-text reviews and recommendations made from the evidence derived.

RESULTS

From the total 8786 abstracts identified by the search, 237 full-text articles met inclusion/exclusion criteria and were included in this update. Two new level II recommendations derived from this work. For the diagnosis of patients with GBM, the use of diffusion-weighted images is recommended to be included in the magnetic resonance images with and without contrast used for surveillance to detect pGBM. For the treatment of patients with pGBM, repeat cytoreductive surgery is recommended to improve overall survival. An additional 21 level III recommendations were provided.

CONCLUSION

Recent published literature provides new recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of pGBM. The Central Nervous System Guidelines Committee will continue to pursue timely updates to further improve the care of patients with diagnosis.https://www.cns.org/guidelines/browse-guidelines-detail/guidelines-management-of-progressive-glioblastoma.

Local treatment for relapsing glioblastoma: A decision-making tree for choosing between reirradiation and second surgery

In case of circumscribed recurrent glioblastoma (rec-GBM), a second surgery (Re-S) and reirradiation (Re-RT) are local strategies to consider. The aim is to provide an algorithm to use in the daily clinical practice. The first step is to consider the life expectancy in order to establish whether the patient should be a candidate for active treatment. In case of a relatively good life expectancy (>3 months) and a confirmed circumscribed disease(i.e. without multiple lesions that are in different lobes/hemispheres), the next step is the assessment of the prognostic factors for local treatments. Based on the existing prognostic score systems, patients who should be excluded from local treatments may be identified; based on the validated prognostic factors, one or the other local treatment may be preferred. The last point is the estimation of expected toxicity, considering patient-related, tumor-related and treatment-related factors impacting on side effects. Lastly, patients with very good prognostic factors may be considered for receiving a combined treatment.

Low Fraction Size Re-irradiation for Large Volume Recurrence of Glial Tumours

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of re-irradiation (re-RT) in patients with advanced local relapses of glial tumours and to define the factors influencing the result of the hyper-fractionated external beam therapy on progression after primary management. We have analysed the data of 55 patients with brain tumours (GBM: 28) on progression, who were re-irradiated between January 2007 and December 2018. The mean volume of the recurrent tumour was 118 cm³, and the mean planning target volume (PTV) was 316 cm³, to which 32 Gy was delivered in 20 fractions at least 7.7 months after the first radiotherapy, using 3D conformal radiotherapy (CRT) or intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The median overall survival (mOS) from the re-RT was 8.4 months, and the 6-month and the 12-month OS rate was 64% and 31%, respectively. The most important factors by univariate analysis, which significantly improved the outcome of re-RT were the longer time interval between the diagnosis and second radiotherapy (p = 0.029), the lower histology grade (p = 0.034), volume of the recurrent tumour (p = 0.006) and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (p = 0.009) at the re-irradiation. Our low fraction size re-irradiation ≥ 8 months after the first radiotherapy proved to be safe and beneficial for patients with large volume recurrent glial tumours.

Appraisal of re-irradiation for the recurrent glioblastoma in the era of MGMT promotor methylation

Despite recent innovation in treatment techniques and subsequently improved outcomes, the majority of glioblastoma (GBL) have relapses, especially in locoregional areas. Local re-irradiation (re-RT) has been established as a feasible option for recurrent GBL of all ages with safety, tolerability, and effectiveness both in survival and quality of life regardless of fractionation schedule. To keep adverse effects under acceptable range, cumulative dose limit in equivalent dose at 2 Gy fractions by the linear-quadratic model at α/β = 2 for normal brain tissue (EQD2) with narrow margin should be observed and single/hypofractionated re-RT should be undertaken very carefully to recurrent tumor with large volume or adjacent to the brainstem. Promising outcome of re-operation (re-Op) plus re-RT (re-Op/RT) need to be validated and result from re-RT with temozolomide/bevacizumab (TMZ/BV) or new strategy is expected. Development of new-concept prognostic scoring or risk group is required to select patients properly and make use of predictive biomarkers such as O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promotor methylation that influence outcomes of re-RT, re-Op/RT, or re-RT with TMZ/BV.

Patterns of re-irradiation for recurrent gliomas and validation of a prognostic score

PURPOSE OR OBJECTIVE

Re-irradiation is a generally accepted method for salvage treatment in patients with recurrent glioma. However, no standard radiation regimen has been defined. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of different treatment regimens and to independently externally validate a recently published reirradiation risk score.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients with recurrent malignant glioma treated with salvage conventionally fractionated (CFRT), hypofractionated (HFRT) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) between 2007 and 2017 at the University Medical Centers in Utrecht and Groningen.

RESULTS

Of the 121 patients included, 60 patients (50%) underwent CFRT, 22 (18%) HFRT and 39 (32%) SRT. The primary tumor was grade II-III in 52 patients and grade IV in 69 patients with median Overall Survival (mOS) since first surgery of 113 [Interquartile range: 53.2-137] and 39.7 [24.6-64.9] months respectively (p < 0.01). Overall, mOS from the first day of re-irradiation was 9.7 months [6.5-14.6]. No significant difference in mOS was found between the treatment groups. In multivariate analysis, the Karnofsky performance scale ≥70% (p < 0.01), re-irradiation for first recurrence (p = 0.02), longer time interval between RT start dates (p < 0.01) and smaller planning target volume (p < 0.05) were significant favorable prognostic factors. The reirradiation risk score was validated.

CONCLUSION

In our series, mOS after reirradiation was sufficient to justify use of this modality. Until a reliable treatment decision tool is developed based on larger retrospective research, the decision for re-irradiation schedule should remain personalized and based on a multidisciplinary evaluation of each patient.

Improved survival of Swedish glioblastoma patients treated according to Stupp

OBJECTIVES

The median survival in glioblastoma (GBM) patients used to be less than 1 year. Surgical removal of the tumor with subsequent concomitant radiation/temozolomide (the Stupp regimen) has been shown to prolong survival. The Stupp protocol was implemented in the county of Jönköping in 2006. The purpose of this study was to examine if the Stupp treatment has prolonged overall survival, in an unselected patient cohort with histologically verified GBM.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This study includes all patients from the county of Jönköping, with a diagnosis of GBM from January 2001 to December 2012. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts, 2001-2005 and 2006-2012, that is before and after implementation of the Stupp regimen. By reviewing the medical case notes, the dates of the histological diagnosis and of death were identified. The median and mean overall survival and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were calculated and compared between the 2 cohorts.

RESULTS

The mean survival was 110 days longer in the cohort treated according to the Stupp regimen. Four patients in the 2006-2012 cohort and 1 patient in the 2001-2005 cohort are still alive. When comparing survival in patients with radical surgery vs biopsy, those that underwent radical surgery survived longer. The significance was slightly greater in the 2001-2005 cohort (mean 163 vs 344 days, P < .001) than in the 2006-2012 cohort (mean 220 vs 397 days, P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Survival significantly improved after the implementation of the Stupp regimen in the study region of Sweden.

Re-irradiation for recurrent high-grade gliomas: a systematic review and analysis of treatment technique with respect to survival and risk of radionecrosis

Background

Re-irradiation may be considered for select patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. Treatment techniques include conformal radiotherapy employing conventional fractionation, hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), and single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

Methods

A pooled, population-weighted, multiple linear regression analysis of publications from 1992 to 2016 was performed to evaluate the relationships between re-irradiation technique and median overall survival (OS) and radionecrosis outcomes.

Results

Seventy published articles were analyzed, yielding a total of 3302 patients. Across all studies, initial treatment was external beam radiotherapy to a median dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions, with or without concurrent chemotherapy. On multivariate analysis, there was a significant correlation between OS and radiotherapy technique after adjusting for age, re-irradiation biologically equivalent dose (EQD2), interval between initial and repeat radiotherapy, and treatment volume (P < .0001). Adjusted mean OS was 12.2 months (95% CI, 11.8-12.5) after SRS, 10.1 months (95% CI, 9.7-10.5) after FSRT, and 8.9 months (95% CI, 8.4-9.4) after conventional fractionation. There was also a significant association between radionecrosis and treatment technique after adjusting for age, re-irradiation EQD2, interval, and volume (P < .0001). Radionecrosis rate was 7.1% (95% CI, 6.6-7.7) after FSRT, 6.1% (95% CI, 5.6-6.6) after SRS, and 1.1% (95% CI, 0.5-1.7) after conventional fractionation.

Conclusions

The published literature suggests that OS is highest after re-irradiation using SRS, followed by FSRT and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Whether this represents superiority of the treatment technique or an uncontrolled selection bias is uncertain. The risk of radionecrosis was low for all modalities overall. Re-irradiation is a feasible option in appropriately selected patients.

Re-irradiation after gross total resection of recurrent glioblastoma : Spatial pattern of recurrence and a review of the literature as a basis for target volume definition

BACKGROUND

Currently, patients with gross total resection (GTR) of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) undergo adjuvant chemotherapy or are followed up until progression. Re-irradiation, as one of the most effective treatments in macroscopic rGBM, is withheld in this situation, as uncertainties about the pattern of re-recurrence, the target volume, and also the efficacy of early re-irradiation after GTR exist.

METHODS

Imaging and clinical data from 26 consecutive patients with GTR of rGBM were analyzed. The spatial pattern of recurrences was analyzed according to the RANO-HGG criteria ("response assessment in neuro-oncology criteria for high-grade gliomas"). Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Furthermore, a systematic review was performed in PubMed.

RESULTS

All but 4 patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy after GTR. Progression was diagnosed in 20 of 26 patients and 70% of recurrent tumors occurred adjacent to the resection cavity. The median extension beyond the edge of the resection cavity was 20 mm. Median PFS was 6 months; OS was 12.8 months. We propose a target volume containing the resection cavity and every contrast enhancing lesion as the gross tumor volume (GTV), a spherical margin of 5-10 mm to generate the clinical target volume (CTV), and a margin of 1-3 mm to generate the planning target volume (PTV). Re-irradiation of this volume is deemed to be safe and likely to prolong PFS.

CONCLUSION

Re-irradiation is worth considering also after GTR, as the volumes that need to be treated are limited and re-irradiation has already proven to be a safe treatment option in general. The strategy of early re-irradiation is currently being tested within the GlioCave/NOA 17/Aro 2016/03 trial.