1
|
Panahi P, Mirzohreh ST, Zafardoust H, Khamnian Z, Alizadeh M. Navigating the waves: A systematic review of telemedicine interventions and health service access challenges in epilepsy during COVID-19. Epilepsy Behav 2024; 158:109934. [PMID: 39079379 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.109934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically reshaped the landscape of healthcare delivery, prompting a surge in the adoption of telemedicine as a means to ensure continuity of care. During the pandemic, patients with epilepsy experienced difficulties accessing healthcare and obtaining necessary medications, with a substantial percentage facing obstacles in acquiring anti-seizure medication and reaching healthcare professionals. Disruptions in the supply and distribution of medication, due to COVID-19-related actions, further caused more problems for people with epilepsy and their caregivers like increasing seizure frequency. The pandemic has also accelerated the adoption of telemedicine, with evidence suggesting its potential benefits in various medical fields. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to investigate the challenges faced by patients with epilepsy during the COVID-19 pandemic, including healthcare access and medication acquisition, as well as evaluate changes in seizure frequency. Additionally, we will synthesize existing evidence on the use of telemedicine to address the healthcare needs of these patients, exploring its advantages and limitations. METHODS This systematic review was prepared using PRISMA reporting guidelines. The databases searched were PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Risk of Bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Following rigorous application of eligibility criteria, relevant data, covering both telemedicine-related and health service access information, were methodically extracted and organized using Microsoft Excel spreadsheets. The analytical procedures were executed through the utilization of Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software. RESULTS A total of 70 articles included in this review. Regarding difficulties in accessing healthcare, 34% of PWE and 41% of caregivers experienced cancelled, changed or postponed appointments. Following issues with obtaining medicine, 13% of patients and 16% of caregivers had difficulties in medicine availability and 11% of patients and 10% of caregivers in medicine accessibility. A very high rate of 90% satisfaction with telemedicine was reported by PWE. 17.6% of PWE experienced an escalation, 9% a decrease and 67% no changes in seizure frequency. CONCLUSION This review and meta-analysis revealed that telemedicine and virtual communications have been helpful but not sufficient for meeting healthcare needs for PWE during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, there was a significant increase in seizure frequency among PWE who had difficulty obtaining medicine and access to healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Zhila Khamnian
- Department of Community Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Mahasti Alizadeh
- Faculty of Medicine, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang Y, Lv J, He C, Shen C, Xu S, Guo Y, Ding Y, Zheng Z, Zhu J, Wang S, Ding M, Wang S. Predictors and prevalence of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with focal epilepsy following resection surgery. Epilepsy Behav 2023; 145:109344. [PMID: 37459719 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, vaccination has emerged as the primary and most effective solution. The aim of this study was to examine compliance rates of vaccination and explore the factors that predict vaccine uptake among patients with epilepsy (PWE) who have undergone resection surgery. METHOD To examine the variations in vaccination coverage, safety concerns, and factors influencing vaccination hesitancy among PWE who have undergone resection surgery, this study recruited patients with at least one-year follow-up. We utilized questionnaires to gather clinical characteristics and obtain information regarding COVID-19 vaccines. RESULTS Among the 303 patients included in the study, a majority of 229 (75.58%) achieved a seizure-free outcome (Engel Ia). Of these patients, 178 (58.75%) received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine, and the vaccination rate has remained relatively consistent over the past six months. Nearly 94.95% of those who received the vaccine completed the full vaccination regimen, with the majority (n = 174, 97.75%) opting for an inactivated vaccine. Only three patients reported side effects unrelated to epilepsy, and one patient experienced a worsening of typical aura seizures within one month after vaccination. Notably, significant positive associations were observed between COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and adulthood (age 18 years or older) (OR = 1.820, 95% CI = 1.018-3.252, p = 0.043) as well as achieving a seizure-free outcome (OR = 2.823, 95% CI = 1.619-4.921, p < 0.001). Regarding the unvaccinated patients, approximately one-fifth expressed willingness to receive a future COVID-19 vaccine, while the remainder were hesitant (41.60%) or unsure (39.20%) about vaccination. These reservations mainly stemmed from concerns about the potential worsening of seizures and vaccine safety. CONCLUSIONS Inactivated vaccines can be considered safe for individuals with epilepsy who have undergone resection surgery. The likelihood of being vaccinated was found to be comparatively higher among the cohort with seizure-free status or adults. To promote COVID-19 vaccination among children, it is crucial to implement comprehensive education and public awareness campaigns that emphasize the safety of vaccines. These efforts will help encourage widespread acceptance of vaccination and ensure the well-being of individuals with epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuyu Yang
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jin Lv
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chenmin He
- Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chunhong Shen
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Sha Xu
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yi Guo
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yao Ding
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhe Zheng
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Junming Zhu
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shuang Wang
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Meiping Ding
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
| | - Shan Wang
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Freund BE, Feyissa AM. EEG as an indispensable tool during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: A review of tribulations and successes. Front Neurol 2022; 13:1087969. [PMID: 36530612 PMCID: PMC9755176 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1087969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, elective and non-emergent tests and procedures were delayed or suspended in lieu of diverting resources to more emergent treatment of critically ill patients and to avoid the spread and contraction of COVID-19. Further, the workforce was stretched thin, and healthcare facilities saw high turnover rates for full-time and contract employees, which strained the system and reduced the ability to provide clinical services. One of the casualties of these changes was electroencephalography (EEG) procedures, which have been performed less frequently throughout the world since the pandemic. Whether considered routine or emergent, the deferral of EEG studies can cause downstream effects, including a delay in diagnosis and initiation of treatment for epilepsy and non-epileptic seizures resulting in a higher risk of morbidity and mortality. Despite these limitations, the importance and utility of EEG and EEG technologists have been reinforced with the development of COVID-related neurological complications, including encephalopathy and seizures, which require EEG for diagnosis and treatment. Since the pandemic, reliance on remote telemonitoring has further highlighted the value and ease of using EEG. There has also been a heightened interest in rapid EEG devices that non-technologist professionals can attach quickly, allowing minimum patient contact to avoid exposure to COVID-19 and taking advantage of remote EEG monitoring. This review discusses the acute and potential long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use and performance of EEG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anteneh M. Feyissa
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Puteikis K, Mameniškienė R. Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among People with Epilepsy in Lithuania. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:4374. [PMID: 33924140 PMCID: PMC8074300 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18084374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2021] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of our study was to determine the willingness to be vaccinated against COVID-19 and factors associated with vaccine hesitancy among people with epilepsy (PWE). In December 2020, we performed an online cross-sectional survey of PWE and their caregivers in Lithuania before the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines to the public. The study sample consisted of 111 respondents (44 (39.6%) male, median age 25 years (range 1 to 70)). From 58 PWE who personally responded to the survey, 27 (46.6%) would be willing to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Among the 53 caregivers, 18 (34.0%) would accept the person they care for to be vaccinated. Willingness to be vaccinated was associated with receiving an influenza shot in 2020 (odds ratio (OR) = 9.17, 95% confidence interval (CI = 1.15-73.47), the beliefs that vaccines are generally safe (OR = 7.90, 95% CI = 2.43-25.74) and that they are the only convenient way to gain immunity (OR = 3.91, 95% CI = 1.02-15.05). Respondents were hesitant to accept the COVID-19 vaccine if they thought it could cause the infection (OR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.04-0.49). COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is frequent among PWE and their caregivers. It is probably related to erroneous beliefs about their safety and mechanism of action.
Collapse
|