Effects of subthalamic deep brain stimulation on non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease: A meta-analysis

Non-Motor Effects of Low-Frequency Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus is an effective therapy for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Typically, stimulation is applied at a high frequency (≥100 Hz) to alleviate motor symptoms. However, the effects on non-motor symptoms can be variable. Low-frequency oscillations are increasingly recognized as playing an important role in the non-motor functions of the subthalamic nucleus. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that low-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (<100 Hz) may have a direct effect on these non-motor functions, thereby preferentially impacting non-motor symptoms of PD. Despite important therapeutic implications, the literature on this topic has not been summarized.

METHOD

To understand the current state of the field, we performed a comprehensive systematic review of the literature assessing the non-motor effects of low-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in PD. We performed a supplementary meta-analysis to assess the effects of low- versus high-frequency stimulation on verbal fluency outcomes.

RESULTS

Our search returned 7,009 results, of which we screened 4,199 results. A total of 145 studies were further assessed for eligibility, and a total of 21 studies met our inclusion criteria, representing 297 patients. These studies were a mix of case reports and control trials. The four clinical outcomes measured were sleep, sensory perception, cognition, and mood. A supplementary meta-analysis of six studies investigating the impact of low-frequency stimulation on verbal fluency did not find any significant results when pooling across subgroups.

CONCLUSION

LFS of the STN may have benefits on a range of cognitive and affective symptoms in PD. However, current studies in this space are heterogeneous, and the effect sizes are small. Factors that impact outcomes can be divided into stimulation and patient factors. Future work should consider the interactions between stimulation location and stimulation frequency as well as how these interact depending on the specific non-motor phenotype.

Clinical neurophysiology in the treatment of movement disorders: IFCN handbook chapter

In this review, different aspects of the use of clinical neurophysiology techniques for the treatment of movement disorders are addressed. First of all, these techniques can be used to guide neuromodulation techniques or to perform therapeutic neuromodulation as such. Neuromodulation includes invasive techniques based on the surgical implantation of electrodes and a pulse generator, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) or spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on the one hand, and non-invasive techniques aimed at modulating or even lesioning neural structures by transcranial application. Movement disorders are one of the main areas of indication for the various neuromodulation techniques. This review focuses on the following techniques: DBS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation, including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and focused ultrasound (FUS), including high-intensity magnetic resonance-guided FUS (MRgFUS), and pulsed mode low-intensity transcranial FUS stimulation (TUS). The main clinical conditions in which neuromodulation has proven its efficacy are Parkinson's disease, dystonia, and essential tremor, mainly using DBS or MRgFUS. There is also some evidence for Tourette syndrome (DBS), Huntington's disease (DBS), cerebellar ataxia (tDCS), and axial signs (SCS) and depression (rTMS) in PD. The development of non-invasive transcranial neuromodulation techniques is limited by the short-term clinical impact of these techniques, especially rTMS, in the context of very chronic diseases. However, at-home use (tDCS) or current advances in the design of closed-loop stimulation (tACS) may open new perspectives for the application of these techniques in patients, favored by their easier use and lower rate of adverse effects compared to invasive or lesioning methods. Finally, this review summarizes the evidence for keeping the use of electromyography to optimize the identification of muscles to be treated with botulinum toxin injection, which is indicated and widely performed for the treatment of various movement disorders.

NoMoFa as a new tool to evaluate the impact of deep brain stimulation on non-motor fluctuations: A new perspective

BACKGROUND

Non-motor symptoms and non-motor fluctuations (NMF) in Parkinson's disease (PD) strongly affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and disability. The impact of deep brain stimulation (DBS) on NMF remains an area of uncertainty. The aim is to evaluate the impact of DBS on NMF, using the recently validated Non-Motor Fluctuation Assessment (NoMoFa), and to explore the correlation between NMF and motor symptoms, motor complications (MC), and HRQoL post-surgical improvement.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated consecutive patients undergoing subthalamic DBS (STN-DBS), at baseline and 6-months after surgery. Assessments included the NoMoFa questionnaire, the MDS-sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, and the 39-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire. Pre- and post-surgical NoMoFa scores were compared using the Wilcoxon Signed rank-test. Linear regression analysis evaluated: a) the correlation between NoMoFa scores, motor and MC improvement, correcting for age, disease duration, and dopaminergic therapy reduction; b) the correlation between HRQoL and NMF improvement, correcting for age, disease duration, motor and MC improvement.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were evaluated. Total NMF score significantly improved (44.6 %, [IQR = 18.3-100]; p = 0.022), particularly in Off condition (52.0 %, [IQR = 25.4-100]; p = 0.009); we observed strong correlation between NMF and MC improvement (Beta = 0.728; p = 0.006), mainly driven by the mitigation of unpredictable Off (Beta = 0.905; p < 0.001). Even after adjusting for potential confounders, the reduction of NMF independently correlated with increased HRQoL (Beta = 0.714; p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

STN-DBS demonstrated strong beneficial effect on NMF, resulting in significant improvement of HRQoL. This underlines the importance of recognizing NMF as a significant factor to be considered in the selection of patients eligible for STN-DBS.

Status of functional neurosurgery in lower middle-income countries (LMICs): A multinational cross sectional survey based analysis of exposure, utilization and perceived barriers

INTRODUCTION

Functional Neurosurgery (FNS) is a non-invasive and highly efficacious neurosurgical subspecialty but lower middle-income countries (LMICs) are disadvantaged in terms of access and availability of FNS. Through this study we have tried to assess the availability, exposure, utilization, and perceived barriers to five major FNS modalities including deep brain stimulation (DBS), vagal nerve stimulation (VNS), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgfUS) and percutaneous rhizotomy in LMICs.

METHODOLOGY

We designed a survey using google forms while following the CHERRIES guidelines. Responses were collected from practicing neurosurgeons, neurosurgical fellows, and residents in LMICs. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software 26.0 RESULTS: A total of 100 responses were recorded of which 96 % were males. 68 % worked in an educational setup. Respondents had the most exposure to SRS (36 %) followed by DBS (28 %) while MRgFUS was the least exposed modality (4 %) (p<0.001). For all modalities except MRgFUS, majority of the respondents were 'Fairly confident' (p<0.001). No statistically significant association was observed in the availability of the modalities with the type of working setup. Majority of the respondents did not consider legal issues (p=0.003) and patient preferences (p=0.007) to be perceived barriers for any modality. Accessibility, affordability, Lack of training were not significant factors for any modality except DBS (52 %, p<0.001; 55 %, p<0.001 and 53 %, p=0.002 respectively) CONCLUSION: An integrated approach including international collaborations, traveling fellowships, novel policies must be adopted to enhance the reach of FNS to LMICs to share the extensive neurosurgical burden and to ease the neurosurgical decision making.

Cognitive and psychiatric outcomes in the GALAXY trial: effect of anaesthesia in deep brain stimulation

BACKGROUND

This study aims: (1) To compare cognitive and psychiatric outcomes after bilateral awake versus asleep subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for Parkinson's disease (PD). (2) To explore the occurrence of psychiatric diagnoses, cognitive impairment and quality of life after surgery in our whole sample. (3) To validate whether we can predict postoperative cognitive decline.

METHODS

110 patients with PD were randomised to receive awake (n=56) or asleep (n=54) STN DBS surgery. At baseline and 6-month follow-up, all patients underwent standardised assessments testing several cognitive domains, psychiatric symptoms and quality of life.

RESULTS

There were no differences on neuropsychological composite scores and psychiatric symptoms between the groups, but we found small differences on individual tests and cognitive domains. The asleep group performed better on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test delayed memory test (f=4.2, p=0.04), while the awake group improved on the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test delayed memory test. (f=4.4, p=0.04). The Stroop III score was worse for the awake group (f=5.5, p=0.02). Worse scores were present for Stroop I (Stroop word card) (f=6.3, p=0.01), Stroop II (Stroop color card) (f=46.4, p<0.001), Stroop III (Stroop color-word card) (f=10.8, p=0.001) and Trailmaking B/A (f=4.5, p=0.04). Improvements were seen on quality of life: Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (f=24.8, p<0.001), and psychiatric scales: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (f=6.2, p=0.01), and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (f=5.5, p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the choice between awake and asleep STN DBS does not affect cognitive, mood and behavioural adverse effects, despite a minor difference in memory. STN DBS has a beneficial effect on quality of life, mood and anxiety symptoms.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NTR5809.

Preoperative Attention/Memory Problem Affects the Quality of Life of Parkinson's Disease Patients after Deep Brain Stimulation: A Cohort Study

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of nonmotor symptoms (NMS) on the quality of life (QoL) outcome after subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) at the 1-year follow-up.

Methods

Ninety-three patients diagnosed with Parkinson's disease (PD), who underwent subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) between April 2020 and August 2021, were included in this study. Demographic information was gathered through a self-designed questionnaire. The severity of both motor and non-motor symptoms, along with the quality of life (QoL), was assessed using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-III (UPDRS-III), Nonmotor Symptoms Scale (NMSS), and 8-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8), respectively.

Results

Significant differences were observed in the UPDRS-III score, NMSS summary index (SI), and subscores of six domains (sleep/fatigue, mood/cognition, perceptual problems/hallucinations, attention/memory, urinary, and sexual function) between the baseline and the 6- and 12-month follow-ups. The correlation analysis revealed positive correlations between the preoperative NMSS SI and subscores of seven domains (cardiovascular, sleep/fatigue, mood/cognition, perceptual problems/hallucinations, attention/memory, gastrointestinal, and urinary) and ΔPDQ-8. Moreover, the preoperative PDQ-8 SI (β = 0.869, P < 0.001) and the preoperative attention/memory subscore (β = -0.154, P = 0.026) were predictive of the postsurgery improvement in quality of life (QoL).

Conclusion

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) led to an improvement in the patients' nonmotor symptoms (NMS) at the 1-year follow-up, along with a correlation observed between NMS and the patients' quality of life (QoL). Notably, the severity of preoperative attention/memory problems emerged as the most significant predictor of NMS influencing the QoL outcome after STN-DBS at the 1-year follow-up.

Architecture of the subthalamic nucleus

The subthalamic nucleus (STN) is a major neuromodulation target for the alleviation of neurological and neuropsychiatric symptoms using deep brain stimulation (DBS). STN-DBS is today applied as treatment in Parkinson´s disease, dystonia, essential tremor, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). STN-DBS also shows promise as a treatment for refractory Tourette syndrome. However, the internal organization of the STN has remained elusive and challenges researchers and clinicians: How can this small brain structure engage in the multitude of functions that renders it a key hub for therapeutic intervention of a variety of brain disorders ranging from motor to affective to cognitive? Based on recent gene expression studies of the STN, a comprehensive view of the anatomical and cellular organization, including revelations of spatio-molecular heterogeneity, is now possible to outline. In this review, we focus attention to the neurobiological architecture of the STN with specific emphasis on molecular patterns discovered within this complex brain area. Studies from human, non-human primate, and rodent brains now reveal anatomically defined distribution of specific molecular markers. Together their spatial patterns indicate a heterogeneous molecular architecture within the STN. Considering the translational capacity of targeting the STN in severe brain disorders, the addition of molecular profiling of the STN will allow for advancement in precision of clinical STN-based interventions.

Advancements in Diffusion MRI Tractography for Neurosurgery

ABSTRACT

Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging tractography is a noninvasive technique that enables the visualization and quantification of white matter tracts within the brain. It is extensively used in preoperative planning for brain tumors, epilepsy, and functional neurosurgical procedures such as deep brain stimulation. Over the past 25 years, significant advancements have been made in imaging acquisition, fiber direction estimation, and tracking methods, resulting in considerable improvements in tractography accuracy. The technique enables the mapping of functionally critical pathways around surgical sites to avoid permanent functional disability. When the limitations are adequately acknowledged and considered, tractography can serve as a valuable tool to safeguard critical white matter tracts and provides insight regarding changes in normal white matter and structural connectivity of the whole brain beyond local lesions. In functional neurosurgical procedures such as deep brain stimulation, it plays a significant role in optimizing stimulation sites and parameters to maximize therapeutic efficacy and can be used as a direct target for therapy. These insights can aid in patient risk stratification and prognosis. This article aims to discuss state-of-the-art tractography methodologies and their applications in preoperative planning and highlight the challenges and new prospects for the use of tractography in daily clinical practice.

Predicting impact of Deep Brain Stimulation on Non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease

This is the largest study on Radiomics analysis looking into the impact of Deep Brain Stimulation on Non-Motor Symptoms (NMS) of Parkinson's disease. Preoperative brain white matter radiomics of 120 patients integrated with clinical variables were used to predict the DBS effect on NMS after 1 year from the surgery. Patients were classified "suboptimal" vs "good" based on a 10% or more improvement in NMS score. The combined Radiomics-Clinical Random Forrest (RF) model achieved an AUC of 0.96, Accuracy of 0.91, Sensitivity of 0.94 and Specificity of 0.88. The Youden's index showed optimal threshold for the RF of 0.535. The confusion matrix of the RF classifier gave a TPR of 0.92 and a FPR of 0.03. This corresponds to a PPV of 0.93 and a NPV of 0.93. The predictive models can be easily interpreted and after careful large-scale validation be integrated in assisting clinicians and patients to make informed decisions.Clinical Relevance- This paper shows the lesser studied positive impact of Deep Brain Stimulation on Non motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease while allows clinicians to predict non responders to the therapy.

Non-motor effects of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease motor subtypes

INTRODUCTION

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) improving quality of life, motor, and non-motor symptoms. However, non-motor effects in PD subtypes are understudied. We hypothesized that patients with 'postural instability and gait difficulty' (PIGD) experience more beneficial non-motor effects than 'tremor-dominant' patients undergoing DBS for PD.

METHODS

In this prospective, observational, international multicentre study with a 6-month follow-up, we assessed the Non-Motor Symptom Scale (NMSS) as primary and the following secondary outcomes: Unified PD Rating Scale-motor examination (UPDRS-III), Scales for Outcomes in PD (SCOPA)-activities of daily living (ADL) and -motor complications, PDQuestionnaire-8 (PDQ-8), and levodopa-equivalent daily dose (LEDD). We analysed within-group longitudinal changes with Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons. Additionally, we explored outcome between-group differences of motor subtypes with Mann-Whitney U-tests.

RESULTS

In 82 PIGD and 33 tremor-dominant patients included in this study, baseline NMSS total scores were worse in PIGD patients, both groups experienced postoperative improvements of the NMSS sleep/fatigue domain, and between-group differences in postoperative outcomes were favourable in the PIGD group for the NMSS total and miscellaneous domain scores.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence of a favourable outcome of total non-motor burden in PIGD compared to tremor-dominant patients undergoing DBS for PD. These differences of clinical efficacy on non-motor aspects should be considered when advising and monitoring patients with PD undergoing DBS.

Real-Life Experience on Directional Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Advanced Parkinson’s Disease

Directional deep brain stimulation (dDBS) is preferred by patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) and by programming neurologists. However, real-life data of dDBS use is still scarce. We reviewed the clinical data of 53 PD patients with dDBS to 18 months of follow-up. Directional stimulation was favored in 70.5% of dDBS leads, and single segment activation (SSA) was used in 60% of dDBS leads. Current with SSA was significantly lower than with other stimulation types. During the 6-month follow-up, a 44% improvement in the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) points and a 43% decline in the levodopa equivalent daily dosage (LEDD) was observed. After 18 months of follow-up, a 35% LEDD decrease was still noted. The Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) stages and scores on item no 30 “postural stability” in UPDRS-III remained lower throughout the follow-up compared to baseline. Additionally, dDBS relieved non-motor symptoms during the 6 months of follow-up. Patients with bilateral SSA had similar clinical outcomes to those with other stimulation types. Directional stimulation appears to effectively reduce both motor and non-motor symptoms in advanced PD with minimal adverse effects in real-life clinical care.