Adenocarcinoma of the gastro-oesophageal junction after sleeve gastrectomy: a case report

Gastric Cancer After Bariatric Surgeries

Bariatric surgery has been covered by medical insurance in Korea, since January 2019; and its number is steadily increasing. Representative bariatric surgeries include adjustable gastric banding, sleeve gastrectomy, and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Each surgical method can be applied according to the patient's condition; however, there are other issues to consider in Korea. Because of the high incidence of gastric cancer in Korea, gastroscopy is recommended every two years after the age of 40. Therefore, it is difficult to perform conventional gastroscopy after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. In this review, the incidence of gastric cancer after representative bariatric surgery was investigated through a literature review, so that it could be used as a reference for the selection of bariatric surgery in Korea.

The Novel Conduit: Challenges of Esophagectomy After Bariatric Surgery

Metabolic surgery has been on the rise over the last 2 decades. As more literature has been being published regarding its efficacy in treating metabolic syndrome as well as advancements in surgical training and safety rise with it, metabolic surgery will in no doubt continue to increase in prevalence. Concomitantly, the prevalence of esophageal cancer is increasing. We present two cases of patients who are status post sleeve gastrectomy and require esophagectomy. These patients do not have the availability of a gastric conduit, and colon interposition graft was planned for their reconstructions. We here review the two unique case scenarios as well as an overview of colon interposition technique and workup considerations. The need this reconstruction technique will likely increase in the years to come and metabolic surgery and esophageal cancer both continue to rise.

Reflux After Sleeve Gastrectomy: An Update

Background: Modifications of gastric anatomy, function, and of the esophagogastric junction secondary to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) can worsen the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Its late diagnosis and poor treatment can lead to serious complications. In recent years, attempts have been made to optimize preoperative studies and improve surgical techniques to prevent this problem. The aim of this study was to update on the presence of GERD and their symptoms post-SG. Methods: A literature review of articles based on randomized clinical trials on the presence of GERD after SG was carried out, in a period of 10 years. Results: A result of 336 articles was obtained, of which 327 were discarded and 9 were included. The variables of GERD post-SG were analyzed according to their symptoms ("improved," "worsened," and "unchanged"), "remission," or appearance "de novo." Conclusion: GERD is a frequently associated pathology in obese patients. Several authors reported that symptoms worsen after SG, and has been diagnosed de novo. The application of exhaustive preoperative studies and a correct surgical technique could reduce its incidence.

Esophagogastric Cancer After Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review of Case Reports

Introduction

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most commonly performed bariatric procedure. It has been shown that bariatric surgery reduces cancer risk. However, the risk of esophagogastric cancer after SG has not been defined yet and the development of cancer in the esophagus and stomach remains a matter of concern.

Methods

Web of Science, PubMed and Embase databases were searched. Articles that described the diagnosis and management of esophageal or gastric cancer after SG were considered.

Results

Seventeen esophagogastric cancer patients after SG were included. The age of the patients ranged from 21 to 64 years. Tumors were diagnosed after an interval of 33.9 ±22.8 months from SG (range 4 months–96 months). There were 4 esophageal cancers,4 gastroesophageal cancers and 9 gastric cancers; adenocarcinoma was the most frequent tumor histology (88.2%). The most commonly reported symptoms were food intolerance/dyspepsia (50.0%), vomiting/nausea/regurgitation (35.7%). Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) with biopsy was used for diagnosis in most of the patients. Surgery was performed in 10 patients (58.8%), while 4 patients were treated by endoscopic procedures (23.5%). The mean follow-up length was 12.2 months (range 3 months– 36 months) and the overall disease-free survival rate was 88.9%.

Conclusion

The development of esophagogastric cancer after SG is still not well defined but it may occur at any time. Preoperative and follow-up UGIE are essential in order to allow for prevention, early diagnosis. Further epidemiologic studies are needed to investigate the post-SG-related risk of esophagogastric cancer development.

The Causes of Gastroesophageal Reflux after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Quantitative Assessment of the Structure and Function of the Esophagogastric Junction by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and High-Resolution Manometry

BACKGROUND

The incidence of de novo gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after LSG is substantial. However, an objective correlation with the structural gastric and EGJ changes has not been demonstrated yet. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on the structure and function of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) and stomach.

METHODS

Investigations were performed before and after > 50% reduction in excess body weight (6-12 months after LSG). Subjects with GERD at baseline were excluded. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), high-resolution manometry (HRM), and ambulatory pH-impedance measurements were used to assess the structure and function of the EGJ and stomach before and after LSG.

RESULTS

From 35 patients screened, 23 (66%) completed the study (age 36 ± 10 years, BMI 42 ± 5 kg/m²). Mean excess weight loss was 59 ± 18% after 7.1 ± 1.7-month follow-up. Esophageal acid exposure (2.4 (1.5-3.2) to 5.1 (2.8-7.3); p = 0.040 (normal < 4.0%)) and reflux events increased after surgery (57 ± 24 to 84 ± 38; p = 0.006 (normal < 80/day)). Esophageal motility was not altered by surgery; however, intrabdominal EGJ length and pressure were reduced (both p < 0.001); whereas the esophagogastric insertion angle (35° ± 11° to 51° ± 16°; p = 0.0004 (normal < 60°)) and esophageal opening diameter (16.9 ± 2.8 mm to 18.0 ± 3.7 mm; p = 0.029) were increased. The increase in reflux events correlated with changes in EGJ insertion angle (p = 0.010). Patients with > 80% reduction in gastric capacity (TGV) had the highest prevalence of symptomatic GERD.

CONCLUSION

LSG has multiple effects on the EGJ and stomach that facilitate reflux. In particular, EGJ disruption as indicated by increased (more obtuse) esophagogastric insertion angle and small gastric capacity were associated with the risk of GERD after LSG. clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01980420.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma after sleeve gastrectomy: actual or potential threat? Italian series and literature review

BACKGROUND

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) leads to esophageal mucosal damage in an elevated percentage of cases, configuring a clinical condition of Barrett's esophagus (BE) in a proportion as high as 15-18.8%. BE may rarely evolve into esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC).

OBJECTIVES

To raise awareness of BE as a precancerous lesion which may progress toward malignancy after this popular bariatric procedure.

SETTING

Bariatric referral centers, Italy.

METHODS

All patients referred to our bariatric center who developed an EAC after SG between 2012 and 2019 were reviewed and consecutively included in this study. The available scientific literature regarding this complication is additionally reviewed.

RESULTS

The 3 male patients comprised in this case series underwent laparoscopic SG between 2012 and 2015 in different bariatric referral centers. Age and body mass index at baseline ranged from 21-54 years and 43.1-75.6 kg/m², respectively. All patients were lost to follow-up early after surgery (3.7 ± 1.4 months), and were diagnosed with EAC at a mean of 27.3 ± 7.6 months after SG. The 4 reported cases in the scientific literature developed an EAC at a mean of 32.5 ± 23 months from SG. Overall, a diagnosis of EAC was made approximately 30.3 ± 17.1 months postoperatively, which seems relatively and worryingly early after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Although the rate and probability of progression from BE to EAC is still not well defined, assuming that the rising popularity and execution of SG leads to a growth in the BE incidence, then the preoperative identification and stratification of cancer risk factors in this subset of patients is strongly encouraged. Clinical and endoscopic follow-ups are essential to allow for prevention and early diagnosis and for epidemiologic data collection purposes.

Malignancy in bariatric surgery patients: a French multisite cohort

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery is associated with decreased cancer-related mortality. An indefinite proportion of patients that undergo bariatric surgery have a history of malignancy or will develop cancer. In these patients, weight loss and oncologic evolution needed to be assessed. The aim of this study was to report the results of patients diagnosed with malignancy before and after bariatric surgery in a French multisite cohort.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent bariatric surgery in six university centers. Patients were divided in two groups: patients with a preoperative history of malignancy and patients diagnosed with malignancy during the follow-up. Both groups were compared with control groups of patients that underwent surgery during the same period.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2018, 8927 patients underwent bariatric surgery. In patients with a history of malignancy (n = 90), breast and gynecologic cancers were predominant (37.8%). Median interval between malignancy and surgery was 60 (38-118) months. After a follow-up of 24 (4-52) months, 4 patients presented with cancer recurrence. Comparative analysis demonstrated equivalent weight loss one year after surgery. In patients with postoperative malignancy (n = 32), breast and gynecologic cancers were also predominant (40.6%). Median interval between surgery and malignancy was 22 (6-109) months. In the comparative analysis, weight loss was similar at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

History of malignancy should not be considered as an absolute contraindication for bariatric surgery. Gynecological cancer screening should be reinforced before and after surgery. The development of malignancy postoperatively does not seem to affect mid-term bariatric outcomes.

Esophageal Pathophysiologic Changes and Adenocarcinoma After Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

To assess the effects of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on acid reflux and esophageal motor function and to evaluate the observation of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) after bariatric surgery.

METHODS

We searched 5 databases for adults who underwent SG or RYGB and had esophageal pH test and/or esophageal manometry before and after surgery. A separate systemic search of observational studies and a retrospective review at 3 institutions of adults who developed EAC after these surgeries were conducted. Outcomes were changes in manometric and pH parameters and EAC cases after SG and RYGB.

RESULTS

A total of 27 nonrandomized studies (SG: 612 patients; RYGB: 470 patients) were included. After SG, lower esophageal sphincter pressure and esophageal body amplitude were decreased and the risk of ineffective esophageal motility was increased. Total and recumbent acid exposure times were increased. After RYGB, an increased risk of ineffective esophageal motility was observed. Total, upright, and recumbent acid exposure times were decreased. The total reflux episodes remained unchanged but with increased nonacid reflux and decreased acid reflux events. Including our largest series, 31 EAC cases have been reported to date after SG and RYGB.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review demonstrates increased acid reflux after SG and decreased acid reflux after RYGB. An observed increased nonacid reflux after RYGB might contribute to failure of gastroesophageal reflux disease improvement. This refluxate might be noxious to the esophagus, warranting further studies. RYGB might not entirely preserve esophageal function as previously believed.

Does Sleeve Gastrectomy Increase the Risk of Barret's Esophagus?

PURPOSE

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most commonly performed bariatric surgical procedure worldwide. However, the impact of SG on Barrett's esophagus (BE) remains unknown. The main objective was to determine the rate of BE 5 years after SG.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients, operated in 2012 by SG in one center, who preoperatively and postoperatively (5 years) underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE), 24-h pH monitoring, and esophageal manometry, were included.

RESULTS

A total of 59 (81.4% of females) patients were included. Preoperative mean age and body mass index were 45.2 ± 11.7 years and 45.2 ± 8.1 kg/m² respectively. Preoperative 24-h pH monitoring reported gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in 18 (30.5%) patients. The mean total body weight loss at 5 years was 16.1 ± 11.2%. No significant difference was observed between preoperative and postoperative de Meester's score (20.2 ± 27.1 and 21.0 ± 21.5 respectively (p = 0.91)) nor between preoperative and postoperative number of acid reflux episodes per 24 h (65.1 ± < 40.0 and 50.3 ± 40.3 (p = 0.21)). The UGIE revealed 5 patients (8.5%) with endoscopically suspected esophageal metaplasia, without confirmed metaplasia on histologic examination. GERD was diagnosed in 32 patients (54.2%), de novo GERD in 16 (27.1%) patients and esophagitis in 16 (27.1%) patients. At 5 years, 25 patients (42.4%) reported a lack of regular medical follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the incidence of postoperative GERD and endoscopic lesions following SG. Even though SG is not contraindicated in case of reflux, GERD patients who undergo SG may be supervised by a close endoscopic surveillance.

Obesity and esophageal cancer: GERD, Barrett´s esophagus, and molecular carcinogenic pathways

INTRODUCTION

Increases in the rates of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) have paralleled rises in the prevalence of overweight and obesity. Despite not being fully understood, obesity-related EAC seems to have different carcinogenic pathways.

AREAS COVERED

This comprehensive review will thoroughly evaluate the current literature, describing the underlying mechanisms that help understanding the strong association between obesity and esophageal cancer.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

The risk of esophageal cancer among obese individuals could be partially explained by several factors: high prevalence of GERD; linear association between central adiposity and Barrett´s esophagus development; low levels of adiponectin and high levels of leptin that alter cell proliferation processes; insulin-resistant state that creates a tumorigenesis environment; and changes in the esophageal microbiota due to unhealthy dietary habits that promote carcinogenesis. In addition, a large proportion of obese patients are undergoing sleeve gastrectomy which can worsen GERD or cause de novo reflux, esophagitis, and Barrett´s metaplasia.

N-SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY: AN OPTION FOR OBESITY AND GERD

Background:

Obesity represents a growing threat to population health all over the world. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy induces alteration of the esophagogastric angle due to surgery itself, hypotony of the lower esophageal sphincter after division of muscular sling fibers, decrease of the gastric volume and, consequently, increase of intragastric pressure; that’s why some patients have reflux after sleeve.

Aim:

To describe a technique and preliminary results of sleeve gastrectomy with a Nissen fundoplication, in order to decrease reflux after sleeve.

Method:

In the current article we describe the technique step by step mostly focused on the creation of the wrap and it care.

Results:

This procedure was applied in a case of 45 BMI female of 53 years old, with GERD. An endoscopy was done demonstrating a hiatal hernia, and five benign polyps. A Nissen sleeve was performed due to its GERD, hiatal hernia and multiple polyps on the stomach. She tolerated well the procedure and was discharged home uneventfully 48 h after.

Conclusion:

N-sleeve is a feasible and safe alternative in obese patients with reflux and hiatal hernia when Roux-en-Y gastric bypass it is not indicated.

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass as a Treatment for Barrett’s Esophagus after Sleeve Gastrectomy

Background

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most frequently performed bariatric procedure today. While an increasing number of long-term studies report the occurrence of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) after SG, its treatment has not been studied, yet.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) as treatment for BE and reflux after SG.

Setting

University hospital setting, Austria

Methods

This multi-center study includes all patients (n = 10) that were converted to RYGB due to BE after SG in Austria. The mean interval between SG and RYGB was 42.7 months. The follow-up after RYGB in this study was 33.4 months. Gastroscopy, 24 h pH-metry, and manometry were performed and patients were asked to complete the BAROS and GIQLI questionnaires.

Results

Weight and BMI at the time of SG was 120.8 kg and 45.1 kg/m2. Eight patients (80.0%) went into remission of BE after the conversion to RYGB. Two patients had RYGB combined with hiatoplasty. The mean acid exposure time in 24 h decreased from 36.8 to 3.8% and the mean DeMeester score from 110.0 to 16.3. Patients scored 5.1 on average in the BAROS after conversion from SG to RYGB which denotes a very good outcome.

Conclusions

RYGB is an effective therapy for patients with BE and reflux after SG. Its outcomes in the current study were BE remission in the majority of cases as well as a decrease in reflux activity. Further studies with larger cohorts are necessary to confirm these findings.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus after sleeve gastrectomy: Case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become one of the most dramatically increasing bariatric procedures worldwide due to its excellent results and impact on the obesity pandemic. Morbid obesity is known to increase the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. However, the evolution of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) along with Barrett's esophagus (BE) after SG is of concern since there is little data available. We present a case of esophageal adenocarcinoma after SG with known intestinal metaplasia on preoperative gastroscopy.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of a 55 years old female patient who presented lower esophageal adenocarcinoma three years after complicated SG with known preoperative BE without dysplasia detected by gastroscopy. Multidisciplinary decision suggested treatment by endoscopic mucosectomy. The endoscopic control at one year did not highlight tumoral recurrence but still BE without dysplasia.

DISCUSSION

Literature review regarding the evolution of BE after SG is poor and the relation between SG and the development of subsequent esophageal cancer isn't clear yet.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative endoscopy should be performed in order to detect GERD, BE, and potential carcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract before undergoing bariatric surgery. The long-term monitoring after SG is essential.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma five years after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. A case report

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has become the most popular bariatric procedure worldwide. However, postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease appearance is a matter of concern. Only two cases of esophageal adenocarcinoma after gastric sleeve have been described, none of them with preoperative endoscopic evaluation.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

We report a case of a 48-year-old male with morbid obesity and normal preoperative endoscopy and esophagram who underwent a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and developed an esophageal adenocarcinoma five years later.

DISCUSSION

Despite promising results in terms of weight loss and resolution of comorbidities, the onset or worsening of gastroesophageal reflux and its related complications, such as Barrett's esophagus or esophageal adenocarcinoma, is a matter of concern and need further study.

CONCLUSION

We present a case of an esophageal adenocarcinoma five years after a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. There is need to better determine the relationship between sleeve gastrectomy and gastroesophageal reflux disease in order to prevent its related complications, such as esophageal adenocarcinoma.

A Review of Sleeve Gastrectomy Specimen Histopathology

With the increasing popularity of sleeve gastrectomy, many stomach specimens are being evaluated. Understanding the significance and treatment for unexpected pathology is important. This study examines the incidence of relevant histopathology of sleeve gastrectomy specimens. It evaluates previous data for each histopathology and provides recommendations for treatment. In this study, a retrospective review was performed for 241 patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy from 2009 to 2014 at a single institution. Of the specimens, 122 had no significant histopathology, 91 had gastritis, 13 had lymphoid aggregates, 5 had hyperplasia, 3 had intestinal metaplasia, 3 had gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), and 3 had gastric polyps. Of the GISTs all had a low mitotic rate and the size of the tumor ranged from 1.5 to 4.5 cm. The findings of metaplasia may be a marker for increased risk of malignancy and may require additional surveillance. The findings of GIST may warrant interval imaging to survey for recurrence, though the likelihood of recurrence for the tumors in this study is less than 2 per cent based on previous studies.