Our experience in using telehealth for paediatric plastic surgery in Western Australia

Insurance Status Predicts Hand Therapy Adherence following Flexor Tendon Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Many patients are not adherent to hand therapy rehabilitation following surgical repair of traumatic flexor tendon injuries, which can negatively affect surgical outcomes and long-term hand function. The authors aimed to identify the factors that predict patient nonadherence to hand therapy following flexor tendon repair surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 154 patients who underwent surgical repair of flexor tendon injuries at a level I trauma center between January of 2015 and January of 2020. A manual chart review was performed to collect demographic data, insurance status, injury characteristics, and details of the postoperative course, including health care use.

RESULTS

Factors significantly associated with occupational therapy no-shows included Medicaid insurance (OR, 8.35; 95% CI, 2.91 to 24.0; P < 0.001), self-identified Black race (OR, 7.28; 95% CI, 1.78 to 29.7; P = 0.006), and current cigarette smoker status (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.18 to 6.15; P = 0.019). Patients without insurance attended 73.8% of their occupational therapy visits, and patients with Medicaid attended 72.0% of their visits, rates significantly lower than the rate of those with private insurance (90.7%; P = 0.026 and P = 0.001, respectively). Patients with Medicaid were eight times more likely to seek emergency department care postoperatively than patients with private insurance ( P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant disparities in hand therapy adherence following flexor tendon repair surgery exist between patients with different insurance statuses, races, and tobacco use. Understanding these disparities can help providers identify at-risk patients to improve hand therapy use and postoperative outcomes.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, II.

Pediatric Plastic Surgery in the COVID-19 Era

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced the healthcare system to adopt novel strategies to treat patients. Pediatric plastic surgeons are uniquely exposed to high rates of infections during examinations and surgeries via aerosol-generating procedures, in part because of the predilection of viral particles for the nasal cavities and pharynx. Telemedicine has emerged as a useful virtual medium for encouraging prolonged patient follow-up while maintaining physical distance. It has proven beneficial in mitigating infection risks while decreasing the financial burden on patients, their families, and healthcare teams. New trends driven by the pandemic added multiple elements to the patient-physician relationship and have left a lasting impact on the field of pediatric plastic surgery in clinical guidelines, surgical care, and patient outcomes. Lessons learned help inform pediatric plastic surgeons on how to reduce future viral infection risk and lead a more appropriately efficient surgical team depending on early triage.

Telehealth in surgery: an umbrella review

BACKGROUND

Telehealth use has increased worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, hands-on requirements of surgical care may have resulted in slower implementation. This umbrella review (review of systematic reviews) evaluated the perceptions, safety and implementation of telehealth services in surgery, and telehealth usage in Australia between 2020 and 2021.

METHODS

PubMed was searched from 2015 to 2021 for systematic reviews evaluating real-time telehealth modalities in surgery. Outcomes of interest were patient and provider satisfaction, safety, and barriers and facilitators associated with its use. Study quality was appraised using the AMSTAR 2 tool. A working group of surgeons provided insights into the clinical relevance to telehealth in surgical practice of the evidence collated.

RESULTS

From 2025 identified studies, 17 were included, which were of low to moderate risk of bias. Patient and provider satisfaction with telehealth was high. Time savings, decreased healthcare resource use and lower costs were reported as key advantages of the service. Inability to perform comprehensive examinations was noted as the primary barrier. In Australia, peak telehealth usage coincided with the introduction of temporary telehealth services and increased lockdown measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients and providers are broadly satisfied with telehealth and its benefits. Barriers may be overcome via multidisciplinary collaboration. Telehealth may benefit surgical care long-term if implemented correctly both during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.