Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion versus open: early Australian experience

Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of its differential effect on effectiveness and safety

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC) is increasingly being used in recent years. Whether iRARC offers advantages over open radical cystectomy (ORC) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the difference of perioperative outcomes, oncological outcomes and complications between iRARC and ORC.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and CNKI databases were searched in July 2023 according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) statement. Studies were identified to be eligible if they compared perioperative outcomes, oncological outcomes and complications in patients who underwent iRARC with ORC.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies involving 7,020 patients were included. Compared to ORC, iRARC was superior for estimated blood loss [EBL WMD: -555.52; 95% CI, -681.64 to -429.39; P<0.001], blood transfusion rate [OR: 0.16; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.28; P<0.001], length of hospital stay [LOS WMD: -2.05; 95% CI, -2.93 to -1.17; P<0.001], Clavien-Dindo grades ≥III complication rate [30d: OR: 0.57; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.75; P<0.001; 90d: OR: 0.71; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.84; P<0.001], and positive surgical margin [PSM OR: 0.65; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.85; P=0.002]. However, iRARC had a longer operative time [OT WMD: 68.54; 95%CI 47.41 to 89.67; P<0.001] and a higher rate of ureteroenteric stricture [ UES OR: 1.56; 95% CI 1.16 to 2.11; P=0.003]. Time to flatus, time to bowel, time to regular diet, readmission rate, Clavien-Dindo grades

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion appears to be superior to open radical cystectomy in terms of effectiveness and safety. However, attention should be paid to the occurrence of ureteroenteric stricture during follow-up.

Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Shi Fu Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
HongJin Shi Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
Zhinan Fan Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China Department of Urology, Meishan People's Hospital, Meishan, China
Jinze Li Department of Urology/Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Ting Luan Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
Haonan Dong Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
Jincheng Wang Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
Shuwen Chen Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
Jinsong Zhang Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
Jiansong Wang Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
Mingxia Ding Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
Haifeng Wang Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China

Collapse

Comparison of Robotic vs Open Cystectomy: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The benefits of a robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) compared to an open approach is still under debate. Initial data on RARC were from trials where urinary diversion was performed by an extracorporeal approach, which does not represent a completely minimally invasive procedure. There are now updated data for RARC with intracorporeal urinary diversion that add to the evidence profile of RARC.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of RARC compared with open radical cystectomy (ORC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multiple databases were searched up to May 2022. We included randomised trials in which patients underwent RARC and ORC. Oncological and safety outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Seven trials of 907 participants were included. There were no differences seen in primary outcomes: disease progression [RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.23], major complications [RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.24] and quality of life [SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.38]. RARC resulted in a decreased risk of perioperative blood transfusion [RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.76], wound complications [RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.55] and reduced length of hospital stay [MD -0.62 days, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.13]. However, there was an increased risk of developing a ureteric stricture [RR 4.21, 95% CI 1.07 to 16.53] in the RARC group and a prolonged operative time [MD 70.4 minutes, 95% CI 34.1 to 106.7]. The approach for urinary diversion did not impact outcomes.

CONCLUSION

RARC is an oncologically safe procedure compared to ORC and provides the benefits of a minimally invasive approach. There was an increased risk of developing a ureteric stricture in patients undergoing RARC that warrants further investigation. There was no difference in oncological outcomes between approaches.

Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion: Initial South Australian experience

Aim:

The aim of this study was to describe the initial experience with robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) performed by two robotic surgeons at a single, Australian centre.

Methods:

Retrospective analysis was conducted on 30 consecutive patients who underwent RARC with ICUD with curative intent for muscle-invasive and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer between 2017 and 2021. Variables analysed included patient baseline characteristics, operative and peri-operative outcomes, as well as short-term pathological outcomes.

Results:

A total 30 patients were included; 87% were male and the median age was 71 years. Half of patients had muscle-invasive bladder cancer and 93% had ileal conduit formation (with the remaining two patients undergoing neobladder formation). The median operating time was 247 minutes. The median estimated blood loss was 450 mL and 20% of patients received a blood transfusion. A high-grade complication (Clavien III–V) was encountered in 13% of patients post-operatively. At 90 days, 30 overall complications (Clavien I–V) occurred across 67% of the patients.

Conclusion:

This series provides further support for the safe introduction of RARC with ICUD in Australia. Further studies with extended duration of follow-up, including oncological outcomes, are required to support widespread adoption of RARC.

Level of evidence:

Level 4 (case series)

Perioperative outcomes of intracorporeal robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

PURPOSE

To systematically review studies comparing the perioperative outcomes of intracorporeal robot-assisted radical cystectomy (iRARC) and open radical cystectomy (ORC).

METHODS

Systematic searches of PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were performed in June 2020. Studies with data comparing iRARC and ORC were included in our review, and a pooled meta-analysis was completed.

RESULTS

In total, 8 studies (7 prospective studies, 1 retrospective study) comparing 1193 patients were included for our review and meta-analysis. Compared with ORC, iRARC demonstrated lower estimated blood loss (weighted mean difference (WMD): -449.25; 95% CI -566.47 - -332.03; p < 0.01), lower blood transfusion rates (OR: 0.31; 95% CI 0.22 - 0.46; p < 0.01), and lower postoperative complication rates with Clavien-Dindo grades III-IV (30 days: OR: 0.65; 95% CI 0.47 - 0.90; p = 0.01; 90 days: OR: 0.72; 95% CI 0.53 - 0.98; p = 0.04), but a longer operative time (WMD: 78.82; 95% CI 52.77 - 104.87; P < 0.01). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between iRARC and ORC in terms of postoperative complication rates with Clavien-Dindo grades Ⅰ-Ⅱ (30 days: OR: 0.71; 95% CI 0.36 - 1.40; p = 0.32; 90 days: OR: 0.98; 95% CI 0.74 - 1.30; p = 0.89), length of stay (WMD: -1.18; 95% CI -3.33 - -2.07; p = 0.06) and positive surgical margins (OR: 0.78; 95% CI 0.0.45 - 1.36; p = 0.38).

CONCLUSION

iRARC was associated with a significantly lower estimated blood loss and a lower blood transfusion rate and major postoperative complication rate than ORC.

Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with complete intracorporal diversion: Initial experience in a tertiary teaching hospital

Objective:

The aim of this study was to report the outcomes from robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) at an Australian public teaching hospital since the introduction of this technique in 2012.

Methods:

A retrospective analysis was conducted on perioperative and pathological outcomes from a consecutive series of 43 patients who underwent RARC for bladder cancer between 2012 and 2020 at Nepean Public Hospital.

Results:

Median operative time was 352 minutes for 32 (74.4%) patients undergoing construction of an ileal conduit, 499 minutes for nine (20.9%) patients undergoing construction of a neo-bladder and 239 minutes for two (4.7%) patients undergoing percutaneous urostomy. Median estimated blood loss was 500 mL, and median length of stay was 12 days. Complications within 60 days of any grade occurred in 63.4% of patients, and major complications (Clavien–Dindo ⩾Grade III) occurred in 20.9% of patients. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 17. Positive surgical margins occurred in 11.6% of patients overall, all in patients with T3 and above disease. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy was utilised in 34.9% of patients overall and in 71.4% of patients with muscle-invasive urothelial cancer.

Conclusion:

The perioperative and pathological outcomes from RARC at our institution are comparable to the international literature.

Level of evidence

Level 4.

Totally intracorporeal robot-assisted urinary diversion for bladder cancer (Part 1). Review and detailed characterization of ileal conduit and modified Indiana pouch

Objective

To review the most used robot-assisted cutaneous urinary diversion (CUD) after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer and create a unified compendium of the different alternatives, including new consistent images

Methods

A non-systematic review of the literature with the keywords “bladder cancer”, “cutaneous urinary diversion”, and “radical cystectomy” was performed.

Results

Twenty-four studies of intracorporeal ileal conduit (ICIC) and two of intracorporeal Indiana pouch (ICIP) were included in the analysis. Regarding ICIC, the patients’ age ranged from 60 to 76 years. The operative time to perform a urinary diversion ranged from 60 to 133 min. The total estimated blood loss ranged from 200 to 1 117 mL. The rate of positive surgical margins ranged from 0% to 14.3%. Early minor and major complication rates ranged from 0% to 71.4% and from 0% to 53.4%, respectively. Late minor and major complication rates ranged from 0% to 66% and from 0% to 32%, respectively. Totally ICIP data are limited to one case report and one clinical series.

Conclusion

The most frequent type of CUD is ICIC. Randomized studies comparing the performance of the different types of CUD, the performance in an intra- or extracorporeal manner, or the performance of a CUD versus orthotopic ileal neobladder are lacking in the literature. To this day, there are not enough quality data to determine the supremacy of one technique. This manuscript represents a compendium of the most used CUD with detailed descriptions of the technical aspects, operative and perioperative outcomes, and new consistent images for each technique.

Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis, cumulative analysis, and systematic review

Over the last decade, the increased utilization of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) in the surgical treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer has led to an uptrend in intracorporeal urinary diversions (ICUD). However, the operative results comparing ICUD to extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD) have varied widely. We performed a meta-analysis to analyze perioperative outcomes and complications of ICUD compared to ECUD following RARC. This study is registered at International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42020164074. A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases in August 2019. A total of six studies comparing ICUD vs ECUD were identified and meta-analysis was conducted on these studies. In addition, a cumulative analysis was also performed on 83 studies that reported perioperative outcomes after RARC and ICUD or ECUD. The Weighed Mean Difference of operative time and blood loss between ICUD and ECUD group was (16; 95% confidence interval - 34 to 66) and (- 86; 95% confidence interval - 124 to - 48), respectively. ICUD and ECUD had comparable early (30-day) and mid-term (30-90-day) complication rate (RR 1.19; 95% confidence interval 0.71-2.0; p = 0.5) and (RR 0.91; 95% confidence interval 0.71-1.15 p = 0.4) respectively. In the 83 studies that were included in the cumulative analysis, the mean operative time for ileal conduit and neobladders by ICUD were 307 and 428 min, respectively, compared to ECUD 428 and 426 min, respectively. ICUD and ECUD have comparable short- and mid-term complication rate. The ICUD group has lower blood loss and lower rate of blood transfusion compared to ECUD.

Perioperative outcomes and safety of robotic vs open cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 12,640 cases

PURPOSE

Robotic radical cystectomy (RRC) has become a commonly utilised alternative to open radical cystectomy (ORC). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of RRC vs ORC focusing on perioperative outcomes and safety.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched from January 2000 to April 2020 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Statement for study selection.

RESULTS

In total, 47 studies (5 randomised controlled trials, 42 non-randomised comparative studies) comprising 12,640 patients (6572 ORC, 6068 RRC) were included. There was no difference in baseline demographics between the groups apart from males were more likely to undergo ORC (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69-0.85). Those with muscle-invasive disease were more likely to undergo RRC (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.09-1.34), and those with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer were more likely to undergo ORC (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72-0.89). RRC had a significantly longer operating time, less blood loss and lower transfusion rate. There was no difference in lymph node yield, rate of positive surgical margins, or Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II complications between the two groups. However, the RRC group were less likely to experience Clavien-Dindo Grade III-IV (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.30-1.89) and overall complications (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.26-1.68) than the ORC group. The mortality rate was higher in ORC although this did not reach statistical significance (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.99-2.35).

CONCLUSION

RRC has significantly lower blood loss, transfusion rate and is associated with fewer high grade and overall complications compared to ORC.

Totally intracorporeal robot-assisted urinary diversion for bladder cancer (part 2). Review and detailed characterization of the existing intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder

Abstract

To review the most used intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder (ICONB) after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer and create a unified compendium of the different alternatives, including new consistent images.

Methods

We performed a non-systematic review of the literature with the keywords “bladder cancer”, “urinary diversion”, “radical cystectomy”, and “neobladder”.

Results

Forty studies were included in the analysis. The most frequent type of ICONB was the modified Studer “U” neobladder (70%) followed by the Hautmann “W” modified neobladder (7.5%), the “Y” neobladder (5%), and the Padua neobladder (5%). The operative time to perform a urinary diversion ranged from 124 to 553 min. The total estimated blood loss ranged from 200 to 900 mL. The rate of positive surgical margins ranged from 0% to 8.1%. Early minor and major complication rates ranged from 0% to 100% and from 0% to 33%, respectively. Late minor and major complication rates ranged from 0% to 70% and from 0% to 25%, respectively.

Conclusion

The most frequent types of ICONB are Studer “U” neobladder, Hautmann “W” neobladder, “Y” neobladder, and the Padua neobladder. Randomized studies comparing the performance of the different types of ICONB, the performance in an intra or extracorporeal manner, or the performance of an ICONB versus ICIC are lacking in the literature. To this day, there are not sufficient quality data to determine the supremacy of one technique. This manuscript represents a compendium of the most used ICONB with detailed descriptions of the technical aspects, operative and perioperative outcomes, and new consistent images of each technique.

Does the Use of a Robot Decrease the Complication Rate Adherent to Radical Cystectomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing Open with Robotic Counterparts

Introduction: Radical cystectomy (RC) is the mainstay of treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. In 2003, the first robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) was performed and since then many studies, mainly observational, were conducted to compare robotic and open methods. This study aims to assess perioperative outcomes between the two methods based on pooled data from existing literature. Methods: A literature search of articles in English and French languages was performed in three databases (Medline, Embase, and Cochrane) until 30th of June 2018, as well as in urology conference programs and reference lists of included studies. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42018103063). Terms such as "robotic," "open," and "radical cystectomy" and synonyms were used for the searching algorithm. The primary outcome was the number of minor and major postoperative complications (Clavien grading system). Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Comparison of continuous outcomes was performed with weighted mean differences, while for dichotomous outcomes, odds ratios (ORs) were used. Review Manager 5.3 was used. Results: Fifty-four studies (5 randomized trials and 49 observational) were eligible, including 29,697 patients (6500 in the RARC group and 23,197 in the open radical cystectomy group). Minor complications (grade 1-2) in pooled data of 29 studies were fewer in the RARC group (OR = 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38-0.76, p < 0.001), a difference persisting after sensitivity analysis for 30 and 90 days. Major complications (grade 3-5) in 31 studies were fewer in the RARC group (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.94, p = 0.009), but this difference disappeared in the 30-day subanalysis. RARC was associated with lower blood transfusion rates (p < 0.001), lower length of stay (p < 0.001), faster return to regular diet (p < 0.001), and lower postoperative mortality rates (p < 0.001), but longer operating time. Conclusions: RARC appears to be associated with fewer complications and favoring perioperative outcomes in comparison with the open method. Due to the observational nature of most studies, larger randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

[Orthotopic neobladder reconstruction for bladder cancer: robotic-assisted versus open-radical cystectomy for perioperative outcomes, functional results and quality of life]

INTRODUCTION

Open radical cystectomy (ORC) is the gold standard technique for carcinologic cystectomies. Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) was introduced in 2003 and its development is booming.

OBJECTIVE

To compare ORC and RARC with totally intracorporal (IC) orthotopic neobladder (ONB) reconstruction, in terms of perioperative outcomes, morbidity, functional results and quality of life (Qol).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From February 2010 to February 2017, a French multicentric, prospective study on patients who had a RC and ONB reconstruction for bladder cancer was performed. All patients completed the following questionnaires: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) generic (QLQ-C30) and the bladder cancer specific instruments (QLQ-BLM30). To assess urinary symptoms, patients also completed the Urinary Symptom Profile questionnaire (USP) and a three-day voiding diary. Patients were divided in two groups: ORC and RARC.

RESULTS

We included 72 patients: 55 in the ORC group (76,4%) and 17 (33,6%) in the RARC group. Operative time was longer in RARC group (median 360 vs 300min; P<0.001) but length of stay was 5 days shorter (median 12 vs 17 days; P<0,05). Patients in RARC group had less blood transfusion (0 vs 23.6%; P<0.05), but a higher rate of uretero-ileal anastomosis stenosis and eventration at long term (respectively 25.5 vs 3.6% et 23 vs 2%; P<0.05). No statistical differences were found concerning quality of life items and functional results between the groups.

CONCLUSION

RARC with totally IC ONB reconstruction lead to less perioperative morbidity with a reduced rate of blood transfusion and a reduced hospital length of stay. At long term, RARC could provide higher rates of uretero-ileal stenosis and eventration. RARC and ORC do not have any differences in terms of functional outcomes and Qol at long term after ONB reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.