A Prospective Study of Arterial Spin Labelling in Paediatric Posterior Fossa Tumour Survivors: A Correlation with Neurocognitive Impairment

AIMS

Posterior fossa tumours (PFTs), which account for two-thirds of paediatric brain tumours, are successfully treated in about 70% of patients, but most survivors experience long-term cognitive impairment. We evaluated arterial spin labelling (ASL), a common, non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique, as a biomarker of cognitive impairment in a paediatric PFT survivor population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty participants were prospectively analysed. PFT survivors were at least 5 years post-treatment and had been treated as appropriate for their age and type of tumour. Group 1 had received radiotherapy and Group 2 had not. Group 3 were healthy controls matched to Group 1 for age, sex and handedness. All participants underwent cognitive assessment and multimodal MRI, including an ASL perfusion sequence. We used semi-quantitative ASL methods to assess differences in mean perfusion in the thalamus, caudate, putamen and hippocampus.

RESULTS

Statistically, no significant associations between cognitive data and radiation doses were identified. Compared with healthy controls, Group 1 patients had significantly lower overall mean perfusion values (20-30% lower, depending on the cerebral structure) and Group 2 had slightly lower mean perfusion values (5-10% lower). Perfusion values did not correlate with total prescribed irradiation doses nor with doses received by different cerebral structures. Episodic and semantic memory test scores were significantly lower in Group 1 and correlated with lower mean absolute perfusion values in the hippocampus (P < 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary results indicate that radiotherapy affects the perfusion of specific cerebral structures and identify perfusion as a potential biomarker of hippocampus-dependent memory deficit.

Quality of life and functional outcomes after radical cystectomy with ileal orthotopic neobladder replacement for bladder cancer: a multicentre observational study

PURPOSE

Ileal orthotopic neobladder (IONB) reconstruction is the preferred urinary diversion among selected patients who have undergone radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BCa). There is insufficient data regarding patients' quality of life (QoL), sexual and urinary outcomes. Our objectives were to assess QoL in a multicentre cohort study, and to identify related clinical, oncological and functional factors.

METHODS

Patients who underwent RC with IONB reconstruction for BCa from 2010 to 2017 at one of the three French hospitals completed the following self-reported questionnaires: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) generic (QLQ-C30) and bladder cancer specific instruments (QLQ-BLM30). To assess urinary symptoms, patients completed the Urinary Symptom Profile questionnaire (USP) and a three-day voiding diary. Univariate and multivariate analyses were computed to identify clinical, pathological, and functional predictors of global QoL score.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients completed questionnaires. The median age was 64 years and 86.3% were men. The median interval between surgery and responses to questionnaires was 36 months (range 12-96). Fifty-five percent of patients presented a high global QoL (EORTC-QLQC30, median score 75). A pre-RC American Society of Anesthesiologists score > 2, active neoplasia, sexual inactivity, and stress urinary incontinence were associated with a worse QoL. After a multivariate analysis, sexual inactivity was the only independent factor related to an altered QoL.

CONCLUSION

Patients with IONB reconstruction after RC have a high global QoL. Sexual activity could independently impact the global QoL, and it should be assessed pre- and post-operatively by urologists.

The importance of jointly analyzing treatment administration and toxicity associated with targeted therapies: a case study of regorafenib in soft tissue sarcoma patients

Background

Different methods have been proposed to analyze adverse events (AEs) associated with targeted therapies. While these AEs lead to dose adjustments for many patients, conventional reporting methods do not take drug administration into consideration. This paper underlines the importance of jointly reporting AEs and drug administration using prevalence, and proposes a complementary approach to reporting.

Patients and methods

The prevalence method estimates the probability of progression-free patients being in a particular health state (state 1: AEs with full dose; state 2: AEs with reduced dose; state 3: no AEs with reduced dose) at different time points. To take into account the impact of dose adjustments on efficacy, the weighted prevalence method can be used by assigning utility weights to the different health states. The benefit of these methods was illustrated using data from a phase II trial of regorafenib.

Results

Only 4.6% of progression-free patients developed mucositis/stomatitis (grade ≥2) at 3 months. The prevalence of patients not experiencing this AE but whose dose was reduced or treatment interrupted was 58.1%. The weighted prevalence of the regorafenib toxicity profile and dose reduction was higher in the control arm.

Conclusion

This case study confirms the importance of jointly analyzing AEs and drug administration. The weighted prevalence approach is an average score that incorporates the dimension of drug administration into AE assessment. This can be helpful for regulatory agencies as well as for clinicians to evaluate the benefit-risk ratio of therapies in their treatment choice.

Clinical trial

NCT01900743.

OS4.4 Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and anti-PDL1 Durvalumab combination in recurrent glioblastoma: Results of the phase I part of the phase I/II STERIMGLI trial

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) remains a lethal disease with inevitable local relapse and no standard treatment. Re-irradiation by hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (hFSRT) is an option of treatment with tolerable safety, but needs improvement in term of efficacy. Radiotherapy (RT) causes immunogenic tumor cell death but also induces PDL1 and PD1 expression on tumors and immune cells, potentially evoking resistance to RT. Pre-clinical studies combining hFSRT with an anti-PD-1 antibody in GBM have shown increased efficacy of the combination. Clinical studies also show encouraging results when checkpoint inhibitors have been combined with high dose RT. We hypothesized that combining the anti PD-L1 Durvalumab (Durva) with hFSRT will be an effective regimen for patients with recurrent GBM. We designed a phase I/II clinical trial studying the combination of hFSRT with Durva for recurrent GBM≤35 mm diameter. Results of the phase I are presented.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients were included from February 2017 to October 2017.

A standard 3 + 3 de-escalation design was used. Patients were treated by hFSRT 24 Gy, 8 Gy/fraction at 80% isodose, every other day, combined with Durva infusion 1500mg first dose (Level 1) or 750 mg (Level -1) delivered on the last hFSRT day followed by 1500 mg Durva infusion every four weeks until relapse. The schema was defined as safe if one patient or less among 6 presents a dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Brain MRI was performed before RT and then every 8 weeks until relapse. Tumor assessment was performed according to RANO criteria.

RESULTS

Among the 6 patients (3 methylated MGMT, 3 unmethylated MGMT; all wild type IDH) included at the level 1, all completed the hFSRT course, only one had a DLT which was an immune related grade 3 vestibular neuritis. At the time of analysis (24/01/19), all the patients had a local tumor progression, 4 were still alive. Local progression free interval (LPFI) ranges from 2.1 to 8.1 months. Interestingly the 2 patients who presented a pseudo-progression had a prolonged LPFI (5.7 and 8.1 months) compared to the other patients. All the patients except these 2 patients had a lymphopenia at inclusion. PDL-1 expression varied from 0 to 70% in the primary tumor.

CONCLUSION

Combining three 8 Gy fractions of hFSRT with 1500 mg Durvalumab on the 3rd fraction hFSRT and every 4 weeks for recurrent GBM is well tolerated justifying exploration of its efficacy in the phase II which is currently in interim analysis

[Orthotopic neobladder reconstruction for bladder cancer: robotic-assisted versus open-radical cystectomy for perioperative outcomes, functional results and quality of life]

INTRODUCTION

Open radical cystectomy (ORC) is the gold standard technique for carcinologic cystectomies. Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) was introduced in 2003 and its development is booming.

OBJECTIVE

To compare ORC and RARC with totally intracorporal (IC) orthotopic neobladder (ONB) reconstruction, in terms of perioperative outcomes, morbidity, functional results and quality of life (Qol).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From February 2010 to February 2017, a French multicentric, prospective study on patients who had a RC and ONB reconstruction for bladder cancer was performed. All patients completed the following questionnaires: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) generic (QLQ-C30) and the bladder cancer specific instruments (QLQ-BLM30). To assess urinary symptoms, patients also completed the Urinary Symptom Profile questionnaire (USP) and a three-day voiding diary. Patients were divided in two groups: ORC and RARC.

RESULTS

We included 72 patients: 55 in the ORC group (76,4%) and 17 (33,6%) in the RARC group. Operative time was longer in RARC group (median 360 vs 300min; P<0.001) but length of stay was 5 days shorter (median 12 vs 17 days; P<0,05). Patients in RARC group had less blood transfusion (0 vs 23.6%; P<0.05), but a higher rate of uretero-ileal anastomosis stenosis and eventration at long term (respectively 25.5 vs 3.6% et 23 vs 2%; P<0.05). No statistical differences were found concerning quality of life items and functional results between the groups.

CONCLUSION

RARC with totally IC ONB reconstruction lead to less perioperative morbidity with a reduced rate of blood transfusion and a reduced hospital length of stay. At long term, RARC could provide higher rates of uretero-ileal stenosis and eventration. RARC and ORC do not have any differences in terms of functional outcomes and Qol at long term after ONB reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Designing phase II clinical trials to target subgroup of interest in a heterogeneous population: A case study using an R package

Phase II trials that evaluate target therapies based on a biomarker must be well designed in order to assess anti-tumor activity as well as clinical utility of the biomarker. Classical phase II designs do not deal with this molecular heterogeneity and can lead to an erroneous conclusion in the whole population, whereas a subgroup of patients may well benefit from the new therapy. Moreover, the target population to be evaluated in a phase III trial may be incorrectly specified. Alternative approaches are proposed in the literature that make it possible to include two subgroups according to biomarker status (negative/positive) in the same study. Jones, Parashar and Tournoux et al. propose different stratified adaptive two-stage designs to identify a subgroup of interest in a heterogeneous population that could possibly benefit from the experimental treatment at the end of the first or second stage. Nevertheless, these designs are rarely used in oncology research. After introducing these stratified adaptive designs, we present an R package (ph2hetero) implementing these methods. A case study is provided to illustrate both the designs and the use of the R package. These stratified adaptive designs provide a useful alternative to classical two-stage designs and may also provide options in contexts other than biomarker studies.

How to report toxicity associated with targeted therapies?

BACKGROUND

In the era of personalized medicine, molecularly targeted therapies (MTT) have modified the outcome of some cancer types. The price of tumor control needs to be balanced with toxicity since these new therapies are administered continuously for several months or sometimes for several years. For cytotoxic drugs, the incidence of adverse event (AE) was traditionally reported as frequency and intensity. This simple measure is not sufficient to capture the recurrent nature and duration of AE. This paper presents two methods to better describe the toxicity burden across the time: prevalence and Q-TWiST.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Limitation of worst-grade method and advantages of prevalence and Q-TWiST in the analysis of toxicity were illustrated using data from a phase II trial and a hypothetically simulated clinical trial.

RESULTS

Prevalence integrates the recurrent nature of AE. Using prevalence, it is possible to obtain a time profile of AE. Q-TWiST method evaluates the weighted time spent in each health state and also considers the recurrent nature of side-effects in order to assess the 'risk-benefit' ratio of a treatment. When interpreting Q-TWiST results, it is necessary to take into account overall survival and progression-free survival and to define a clinically relevant difference according to the setting.

CONCLUSION

The two methods presented here capture different effects. They are helpful for physicians in their treatment choice (balance benefit risk), to counsel patients and to optimize supportive care. In order to ensure consistency and provide critical information required for medical decision-making, it is important to encourage the use of alternative statistical methods in the analysis of toxicities associated with MTT.

CLINICAL TRIAL

NCT00541008.

Assessment of health status over time by Prevalence and Weighted Prevalence functions: Interface in R

The importance of evaluating complications and toxicity during and following treatment has been stressed in many publications. In most studies, these endpoints are presented descriptively and summarized by numbers and percentages but descriptive methods are rarely sufficient to evaluate treatment-related complications. Pepe and Lancar developed Prevalence and Weighted Prevalence functions which take into account the duration and the severity of complication unlike conventional methods of survival analysis or competing risks which are limited to the time to first event. The purpose of this paper is to describe features and use of two R functions, main.preval.func and main.wpreval.func, which were designed for the analysis of survival adjusted for quality of life. These functions compute descriptive statistics, survival and competing risks analysis and especially Prevalence and Weighted Prevalence estimations with confidence intervals and associated test statistics. The use of these functions is illustrated by several examples.