Solid pseudopapillary tumour of the pancreas: clinicopathological analysis

Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: A systematic review of clinical, surgical and oncological characteristics of 1384 patients underwent pancreatic surgery

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) are rare clinical entity, with low malignancy and still unclear pathogenesis. They account for less than 2% of exocrine pancreatic neoplasms. This study aimed to perform a systematic review of the main clinical, surgical and oncological characteristics of pancreatic SPTs.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were systematically searched for the main clinical, surgical and oncological characteristics of pancreatic SPTs up to April 2021, in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) standards. Primary endpoints were to analyze treatments and oncological outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 823 studies were recorded, 86 studies underwent full-text reviews and 28 met inclusion criteria. Overall, 1384 patients underwent pancreatic surgery. Mean age was 30 years and 1181 patients (85.3%) were female. The most common clinical presentation was non-specific abdominal pain (52.6% of cases). Mean overall survival was 98.1%. Mean recurrence rate was 2.8%. Mean follow-up was 4.2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic SPTs are rare, and predominantly affect young women with unclear pathogenesis. Radical resection is the gold standard of treatment achieving good oncological impact and a favorable prognosis in a yearly life-long follow-up.

Multicenter Study on the Performance of Imaging Tests Compared to Endosonography-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas

Introduction

Imaging diagnosis of pancreatic solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) is difficult. Preoperative diagnosis by endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is possible and has been reported in the literature in pancreatic tumors. However, its usefulness is still controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of the EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of patients with SPN and describe the findings in computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography imaging (MRI/MRCP), and EUS therefore comparing the imaging methods alone to the findings of microhistology (McH) obtained by EUS-FNA.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients undergoing EUS-FNA with suspected SPN in imaging studies in 5 Brazilian high-volume hospitals (two university hospitals and three private hospitals). The demographic data; findings in CT, MRI/MRCP, and EUS; and McH results obtained by EUS-FNA were noted prospectively. The final diagnosis was obtained after the anatomopathological examination of the surgical specimen in all patients (gold standard), and we compared the results of CT, MRI/MRCP, EUS, and the McH with the gold standard.

Results

Fifty-four patients were included in the study, of which 49 (90.7%) were women with an average age of 33.4 (range 11-78) years. The most common symptom presented was abdominal pain, present in 35.2% patients. SPN was detected incidentally in 32 (59%) patients. The average size of the tumors was 3.8 cm (SD: 2.26). The most common finding at EUS was a solid, solid/cystic, and cystic lesion in 52.9%, 41.1%, and 7.8% patients, respectively. The final diagnosis was 51 patients with SPN and 3 with nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-NET). The correct diagnosis was made by CT, MRI/MRCP, EUS isolated, and EUS-FNA in 21.9%, 28.88%, 64.71%, and 88.24%, respectively. EUS-FNA associated with CT and MRI increased diagnostic performance from 22.72% to 94.11% and from 29.16% to 94.11%, respectively.

Conclusions

SPN are rare, incidentally identified in most cases, and affect young women. Differential diagnosis between SPN, NF-NET, and other types of tumors with imaging tests can be difficult. EUS-FNA increases preoperative diagnosis in case of diagnostic doubt and should be used whenever necessary to rule out NF-NET or other type of solid/cystic nodular lesion of the pancreas.

Diagnosis and treatment of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas in children: A report of 18 cases

Purpose

To explore the incidence, imaging and treatment of solid pseudopapillary tumor of pancreas in children, and Summarize the experience of treatment.

Methods

The clinical data of 18 children with a solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas treated in our hospital from January 2012 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The age range was 8-16 years old, the average age was 11.67 years old, and the median age was 11.5 years old, namely, three boys with an average age of 10 years old and 15 girls with an average age of 12 years old. In total, two cases were admitted to the hospital because of trauma, seven cases were found in physical examination, and nine cases were admitted with the abdominal pain as the main complaint. Enhanced CT examination was performed before operation, nuclear magnetic resonance examination and abdominal ultrasound examination were performed in some children, and plain CT scan was performed after operation.

Results

Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas can occur in all parts of the pancreas, especially in the body and tail of the pancreas. Among the 18 cases, SPN occurred in the head of pancreas in 5 cases (27.78%), the neck of pancreas in 2 cases (11.11%), and the body and tail of pancreas in 11 cases (61.11%). All the 18 children were treated by operation. among them, 4 cases underwent choledochal pancreatico duodenectomy (1 case), 4 cases underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with splenectomy (3 cases), 6 cases underwent spleen-preserving pancreatectomy / tail pancreatectomy (1 case), 3 cases underwent enucleation of pancreatic tumor due to exogenous growth, 1 case underwent laparoscopic partial pancreatectomy and pancreaticoenterostomy. Laparotomy was performed in 12 cases and endoscopic surgery in 6 cases. Postoperative pathology confirmed solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas. None of the patients received radiotherapy and chemotherapy after operation and were followed up for 6 months to 2 years. There was no recurrence, metastasis or pancreatic dysfunction.

Conclusion

Solid pseudopapillary tumor of pancreas in children is a rare, low-grade malignant solid tumor with no specific clinical manifestations and laboratory examinations. Preoperative diagnosis mainly depends on enhanced CT. Surgical resection of tumor is a reliable treatment, and the specific operation is mainly based on the experience of the chief surgeon, the location of the tumor and the invasion of surrounding tissue. At present, there is no evidence of the effectiveness of other treatment options, and surgical resection of the tumor has a good prognosis.

Long-term survival following resection of a solid pseudopapillary tumour of the pancreas with arterial and venous encasement

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) of the pancreas (also known as Franz tumours) are rare, representing 1%-2% of pancreatic tumours. They are of exocrine gland origin and are more prevalent in women under the age of 30. They are classified as low-grade malignancies and are usually treated with surgery.We present the case of a young woman who was found to have a pancreatic head lesion obstructing the superior mesenteric vein and encasing the superior mesenteric artery. Diagnosis of SPN was confirmed on histology. Initially deemed unresectable due to vascular encasement, the patient received neoadjuvant chemotherapy to downstage the tumour. This was unsuccessful. Given the patient's young age and lack of other options, surgery was performed. Instead of vascular resection, the tumour was split and peeled off the superior mesenteric artery giving an R1 resection. The patient has achieved long-term recurrence free survival at 10 years.

[Metastatic solid pseudopapillary tumor in the perinephric fat without a primary identified focus]

Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas is an extremely rare neoplasm of the exocrine portion of this organ, which affects mostly young women and is characterized by a low malignancy potential and a relatively benign clinical course. According to the literature, even in disease progression as metastases, the overall 5-year survival rate is more than 95%. The paper describes a clinical case of a female patient with a solid pseudopapillary pancreatic tumor regarded as a metastatic neoplasm in the retroperitoneal space after surgical treatment previously performed in 2001.

[Rare pancreatic tumors]

Beyond pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, which is by far the most frequent pancreatic neoplasm, a great variety of tumors occur in the pancreas. They include solid and cystic masses and epithelial and nonepithelial neoplasms, and they show a great diversity in their biological behavior, ranging from benign tumors to highly aggressive neoplasms. As examples of rare pancreatic tumors, clinical, morphological, and molecular aspects of acinar cell carcinoma, pancreatoblastoma, solid pseudopapillary neoplasm, and serous cystic neoplasms are presented and discussed.

Synchronous solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in a young male patient: An unusual deadly occurrence

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas (SPN) is a tumour with low malignant potential, albeit with good prognosis. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a malignant and aggressive tumour with poor prognosis.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

We report a case of a 38 years old African male patient with abdominal pain for 5 years that worsened in the preceding 5 months. Radiology showed pancreatic and liver lesions which were thought to be malignant and benign, respectively. However, intra-operative and histopathological assessment confirmed SPN and iCCA which were contrary to radiological findings. Whilst surgery was uneventful, the patient died after 15 days.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Whilst SPN is commonly seen in young females, it is rare in males and has been associated with aggressive behaviour. The prognosis is good, albeit the presence of metastasis. iCCA is rare in younger population notwithstanding the presence of risk factor. Combination of iCCA and SPT has not been described. Both these tumours do not share risk factors, pathogenesis or molecular alterations.

CONCLUSION

The concomitant occurrence of these two pathologies in young male patient is unusual and preoperative diagnosis may be very difficult.

Large tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, and synchronous metastasis are associated with the recurrence of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas

BACKGROUND

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) of the pancreas have low malignant potential. However, malignant SPNs are not fully understood.

METHODS

To evaluate risk factors affecting malignant potential, the clinicopathologic features of 375 surgically resected SPNs were compared.

RESULTS

Fifty (13.3%) had malignant histologic features. Twenty-seven and 22 had perineural and lymphovascular invasions, respectively. Adjacent organ invasion was noted in 9 cases. Recurrence occurred in 8 cases. The median recurrence time after surgical resection was 67 months and was associated with a higher pT category (P = 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.001), and synchronous metastasis (P < 0.001). SPN patients with malignant histologic features had worse recurrence-free survival (RFS; 10-year survival rate, 73.2%) than those without malignant histologic features (96.3%; P = 0.01). Patients with a higher pT category (P = 0.04), synchronous metastasis (P < 0.01), and lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.01) had worse RFS. Lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.042) and a higher T category (P = 0.002) were poor prognostic factors for recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Lymphovascular invasion and a higher T category were worse prognostic factors for recurrence in SPN patients with malignant histologic features. For SPN patients with malignant histologic features, a longer follow-up may be required.

Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of 29 cases of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas in patients under 20 years of age along with detailed review of literature

Background

Pancreatic Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms (SPNs) are rare low-grade malignant tumors with a marked preponderance for young females. Objective was to describe the morphology, differential diagnosis, and prognosis of SPNs in patients under 20 years of age and present a detailed review of literature.

Methods

A total of 29 cases in patients under 20 years of age reported as SPN during the period January 2014 to December 2019, were included in the study. These included 19 resection specimens, 4 incision biopsies and 6 cases received as blocks for second opinion. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides as well as immunohistochemistry (IHC) slides of all cases were retrieved and reviewed by the authors. TFE3 and Progesterone Receptor were performed retrospectively.

Results

Twenty-eight of the 29 patients were females. Ages of patients ranged from 12 to 19 years. Nineteen cases were resections. Tail was the commonest location. Mean tumor size was 9.5 cm. In 89.5% cases, tumor was confined to the pancreas. In 2 cases, distant metastasis was present. In 2 cases, extension beyond pancreas was seen. Solid and pseudopapillary areas were seen in all cases while other features were variable. Beta catenin and Cyclin D1 were positive in most cases while TFE3 was positive in 57% cases. Progesterone Receptor (PR) was positive in all 13 cases in which it was performed. Follow up was available in 14 patients. Follow up period ranged from 3 to 70 months. Twelve were alive and well without recurrence or metastasis while 2 were alive with recurrence and metastasis to liver and omentum respectively.

Conclusions

Although many studies on SPNs have been published, surgeons, oncologists and even pathologists in this part of the world are often not aware of these rare tumors leading to inaccuracies and delays in diagnosis. In addition, this paper focusses on the interesting observation that the majority of SPNs diagnosed in our department during study period occurred in patients under 20 years of age (29 versus 21 in patients over 20). However, clinico-epidemiological, morphologic and prognostic features were similar in both age groups. Possibility of SPNs should always be considered in case of pancreatic neoplasms occurring in patients under 20 years of age as well. We believe that this is a very interesting and helpful study for the clinicians as well as the pathologists.

Hepatic metastasis in Frantz's tumor: A case report

•

This is a borderline tumor with indolent biological behavior.

•

There are still multiple poorly understood factors that can dictate its malignant transformation and prognosis.

•

Here, a rare tumor whose age and survival are tangent the literature reports describe.

•

There is a need for a long and rigorous segment to identify possible long-term metastases.

Introduction

Frantz’s Tumor or Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm (SPN) is rare with a solid-cystic pattern, and most common in young women.

Presentation of case

This study based on guidelines for case reports (SCARE) reports a case of SPN in a teenager aged 13 years at the diagnosis time, attended at a teaching public hospital in Brazil, which evolved into liver metastases. Clinical, laboratory, therapeutic and imaging data were collected from the physical chart and analyzed in light of current publications on the topic. The first consultation occurred in January 2012, where weight loss, fever, vomiting, left-sided hypochondrium and epigastric pain were reported. Imaging exams evidenced an expansive heterogeneous process in the pancreatic tail; however, laboratory exams and tumor markers did not present alteration in relation to reference values. In March of 2012, she underwent caudal body pancreatectomy, splenectomy, segmental colectomy and colo-coloanastomosis as a function of the intraoperative findings. After 63 months, right-sided hepatectomy was performed to resect metastases. Currently, she is undergoing outpatient monitoring, without complaint or alterations in imaging and laboratory exams, totaling 100 months of global survival.

Discussion

This is an interesting case report of a rare tumor, in so far as without any adjuvant chemotherapies, an 8-year long survival time could be achieved in this particular type of tumor despite initially large tumor expansion and later liver metastases.

Conclusion

Additional epidemiological studies, molecular and clinical trials are required to increase knowledge on SPN.

PANCREATODUODENECTOMY FOR SOLID PSEUDOPAPILLARY TUMOR OF THE PANCREAS: A MULTI-INSTITUTION STUDY

Background:

Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas is a rare low-grade malignant neoplasm. Most patients present with nonspecific symptoms until the tumor becomes large. Complete surgical resection by pancreatoduodenectomy is the treatment of choice for tumors located in the head of the pancreas

Aim:

To analyzed the clinicopathologic features, management, and outcomes of patients who had solid pseudopapillary tumor of the head pancreas and underwent surgical resection.

Methods:

Were analyzed 16 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for this condition.

Results:

Mean age was 25.7 years old, and 15 patients were female (93.7%). Nonspecific abdominal pain was present in 14 (87.5%). All underwent computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging as part of diagnostic workup. The median diameter of the tumor was 6.28 cm, and surgical resection was performed with open or laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Postoperative complications occurred in six patients (37.5%) and included pancreatic fistula without mortality. The mean of hospital stay was 10.3 days. Median follow-up was 3.6 years, and no patient had local recurrence or metastatic disease.

Conclusion:

For these patients surgical resection with pancreatoduodenectomy is the treatment of choice showing low morbidity, no mortality, and good long-term survival.

Outcome and prognosis after pancreatectomy in patients with solid pseudopapillary neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN) are rare and represent approximately 4% of all cystic pancreatic tumors. The prognosis is excellent, although 10-15% of SPN patients show metastasis at the time of surgery or tumor recurrence during follow-up after pancreatectomy. Aim of the study was to analyze surgical management, risk factors for malignancy as well as long-term outcome and prognosis of this distinct tumor entity.

METHOD

All patients with pancreatic resection for SPN between 10/2001 and 07/2018 in the authors' institution were identified from a prospective database. Clinicopathologic details, perioperative data and long-term follow-up results were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were identified, 44 (85%) of them were female and the median age was 29 years (IQR 9-71). Seven (13%) patients showed a malignant behaviour of SPN with N1 (n = 2) or M1 (n = 1) disease at resection; 5 patients developed tumor recurrence, after a median of 21 months. During follow-up time (median 54 months) all patients were alive, the 5- and 10-year rates for disease-free survival were 89.0% and 81.6%, respectively. Significant risk factors for recurrence were age <18 years (p = 0.0087) and parenchyma-preserving surgical approaches (p = 0.0006). The postoperative long-term outcome showed ECOG = 0-1 in all patients, with resection related exocrine insufficiency in 20 (41%) and diabetes mellitus in 2 (4%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Age < 18 years is a significant risk factor for malignancy in SPN, and parenchyma preserving resections harbor a significant risk for tumor recurrence. As recurrence may occur late, a systematic life-long follow-up should be performed.

Pleomorphic and atypical multinucleated giant cells in solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of pancreas: A diagnostic pitfall in cytology and a review of the literature

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas (SPN) is a rare low-grade malignancy typically occurring in young women. Occasionally, these neoplasms present with pleomorphic to atypical multinucleated giant tumor cells which may mimic high-grade malignancy. Our patient is a 25-year-old male who presented with one year of intermittent epigastric pain. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a 3.1 × 2.5 cm mass in the pancreas body. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the mass showed large pleomorphic cells and atypical multinucleated giant cells in a background of singly scattered polygonal cells. Focally, these cells surrounded delicate hyalinized to fibrovascular cores forming pseudopapillae. Immunohistochemical stains show tumor cells are positive for beta-catenin, CD10, vimentin, and CD56. Although rare surgical pathology publications have described the presence of pleomorphic to atypical multinucleated giant cells occurring in SPN, to our knowledge, this is the first case reported example focused on cytomorphologic illustration and description.

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the testis: Comprehensive mutational analysis of 6 testicular and 8 pancreatic SPNs

BACKGROUND

Recently, we came with the theory of a possible relationship between a group of testicular and pancreatic tumors. We used one case of a pancreatic analogue solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the testis composed partially of areas reminiscent of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas and partially of structures identical to primary signet ring stromal tumor of the testis (PSRSTT) as a connecting link between these two entities. After demonstrating that PSRSTT and pancreatic analogue SPN of the testis share the same immunoprofile and genetic features characteristic for pancreatic SPN, we came to the conclusion that pancreatic analogue SPN of the testis and PSRSTT represent a morphological spectrum of a single entity and that both are related to the pancreatic SPN.

DESIGN

The aim of this study is to present a series of 6 cases of testicular tumors, which lacked the signet ring cell component and were thus morphologically very similar to the SPN of the pancreas. The goal of this study is to compare the genetic background of these testicular tumors that are obviously related to the PSRSTT/pancreatic analogue SPN of the testis with the series of 8 pancreatic SPN.

RESULTS

The mutational analysis revealed an oncogenic somatic mutation in the exon 3 of the CTNNB1 (β-catenin) gene in all analyzable (5/6) testicular and all pancreatic (8/8) tumors. The immunoprofile (positivity with β-catenin, CD10, vimentin, NSE, CD56, and negativity with inhibin, calretinin, chromogranin) was identical in all testicular and pancreatic tumors.

CONCLUSION

This study expanded the morphological spectrum of the PSRSTT/pancreatic analogue SPN of the testis by adding 6 cases without the signet ring cell component. Considering the obvious analogy of PSRSTT/pancreatic analogue SPN of the testis/SPN of the testis and their relationship to the pancreatic SPN we propose the collective term "solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the testis" for these tumors. The mutational profile of the SPN of the testis and pancreas was the same in both groups of tumors which we consider as a final proof that SPN of the testis is identical to the SPN of the pancreas.