Outcomes following emergency laparotomy in Australian public hospitals

Reduced preoperative serum choline esterase levels and fecal peritoneal contamination as potential predictors for the leakage of intestinal sutures after source control in secondary peritonitis

BACKGROUND

The high rate of stoma placement during emergency laparotomy for secondary peritonitis is a paradigm in need of change in the current fast-track surgical setting. Despite growing evidence for the feasibility of primary bowel reconstruction in a peritonitic environment, little data substantiate a surgeons' choice between a stoma and an anastomosis. The aim of this retrospective analysis is to identify pre- and intraoperative parameters that predict the leakage risk for enteric sutures placed during source control surgery (SCS) for secondary peritonitis.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and December 2020, 497 patients underwent SCS for secondary peritonitis, of whom 187 received a primary reconstruction of the lower gastro-intestinal tract without a diverting stoma. In 47 (25.1%) patients postoperative leakage of the enteric sutures was directly confirmed during revision surgery or by computed tomography. Quantifiable predictors of intestinal suture outcome were detected by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Length of intensive care, in-hospital mortality and failure of release to the initial home environment were significantly higher in patients with enteric suture leakage following SCS compared to patients with intact anastomoses (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0026 and p =0.0009, respectively). Reduced serum choline esterase (sCHE) levels and a high extent of peritonitis were identified as independent risk factors for insufficiency of enteric sutures placed during emergency laparotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

A preoperative sCHE < 4.5 kU/L and generalized fecal peritonitis associate with a significantly higher incidence of enteric suture insufficiency after primary reconstruction of the lower gastro-intestinal tract in a peritonitic abdomen. These parameters may guide surgeons when choosing the optimal surgical procedure in the emergency setting.

A Retrospective Cohort Study on One-Year Mortality Following Emergency Laparotomy: A Tertiary Centre Experience From Western Australia

Background Emergency laparotomy is a common general surgical procedure associated with a high mortality and morbidity profile. While short-term outcomes following emergency laparotomy have been increasingly described, there remains a paucity of literature on long-term outcomes in Australia. We report our one-year mortality following emergency laparotomy at Royal Perth Hospital, Australia. Methodology A retrospective observational series of emergency laparotomies performed during 2019 and 2020 at Royal Perth Hospital was collected. The primary endpoint is the one-year mortality, and the secondary endpoints are patient demography, COVID-19 status, ASA classification, surgical category, operative indication, primary surgical pathology, procedure and surgical duration, ICU stay, post-operative destination, length of stay, 30-day mortality, and 90-day mortality. Subgroup analysis was performed for years 2019 and 2020. Results A total of 272 emergency laparotomies were performed during the two-year study period. The average age was 61 years (range 18- 98, SD ± 18.32). The majority of patients were in the ASA classification III (n= 134, 49.26%). The average length of patients' stay was 14.17 days (median 10, IQR 11). Moreover, 31.98% of patients were admitted directly to the ICU following emergency laparotomy. One year mortality was 16.6%. However, a significant difference in the long-term mortality rates was observed between the two calendar years, 24.6% in 2019 and 8.66% in 2020. The one-month mortality rate was 7.33%, and the three-month mortality rate was 10.85%. Conclusion The one-year mortality rate observed is high and considerable and similar to experiences published elsewhere. The significant reduction in mortality during the study period warrants further investigation and may reflect improved planning and attitudes around these high-risk surgeries.

An 8-year retrospective review of emergency laparotomy outcomes in a Queensland rural hospital

OBJECTIVE

Emergency laparotomy (EL) is a major operation performed in critically unwell patients. The National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA), undertaken in the UK since 2013 has shown progressive improvement in clinical outcomes, specifically reduced mortality, and length of stay (LOS) through the implementation of perioperative key performance indicators (KPIs) (ANZ J Surg. 2021;91:2575, Br J Surg. 2015;102:57, Br J Surg. 2017;104:463, JAMA Surg. 2019;154:e190145). The objective is to generate a rural hospital EL audit (MELA) to evaluate local outcomes and clinical standards of practice with regional, national, and international benchmarks.

METHODS

A review of medical records between January 2014 and December 2021 of patients who undergo an EL. Data collected include patient demographics, clinical information, compliance to KPIs and the primary outcomes of 30-day mortality and LOS.

DESIGN

This is a descriptive quantitative study. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were similar to those defined in NELA and ANZELA-QI.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

The general surgeons at the rural hospital provide emergency surgery services for the North-West Queensland community.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

To review local clinical outcomes of 30-day mortality, LOS, and adherence to perioperative KPIs.

RESULTS

Overall, 84 patients met inclusion criteria. The median age (IQR) was 61 (48.8-70.3) years. The 30-day mortality was 3.6% and mean LOS was 12.8 (±13.4) days which was secondary to the low-risk patients within the data set. Compliance to KPIs (≥80%) was achieved in five of eight standards assessed.

CONCLUSION

Local outcomes appear to be comparable to national and international benchmarks and a similar rural setting. The audited cohort outperformed the national standard in adherence to perioperative KPIs.

Getting back 'home' after emergency laparotomy: how many never make it?

BACKGROUND

Emergency laparotomy (EL) is performed on about 15 500 patients in Australia each year. Aside from mortality there is significant concern about the possibility that previously independent patients discharged after EL will become reliant on long-term dependent care. This study aimed to establish the proportion of patients not returning to their pre-admission residence, a proxy for dependent care, following EL.

METHODS

Data were collected on all adult patients who underwent EL across four Australian hospitals over 2 years. A total of 113 data points were collected including pre-hospital residence, discharge destination, mortality and place of residence at 90 and 365 days.

RESULTS

A total of 782 patients underwent EL, the mean age was 64 years. Pre-admission, 95.5% of patients were living in their own home. Inpatient mortality was 7.0% and at discharge 72.4% of patients returned directly back to their pre-hospital residence. At 90 days, mortality was 10.5%, and 87% of patients had returned to their pre-hospital residence, including all patients under 70 years of age. By 365 days, overall mortality was 16.8%, and only 1.5% of patients (all aged >70 years) had not returned to their pre-hospital residence.

CONCLUSION

Patients who survive 90 and 365 days following EL nearly all return to their pre-hospital residence, with only a very small proportion of previously independent patients entering dependent care. This should help inform shared decision-making regarding emergency laparotomy in the acute setting.

Low mortality rate after emergency laparotomy in Australia is a reflection of its national surgical mortality audit influencing futile surgery

BACKGROUND

Australia's unique national surgical mortality audit has had a long-term focus on the avoidance of futile surgery. The 30-day mortality rate after emergency laparotomy in Australia is lower than in other countries. Early death (within 72 h) after emergency laparotomy may reflect futile surgery. This paper considers whether Australia's national mortality audit is the reason for its lower mortality rate after emergency laparotomy.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the Australia and New Zealand Emergency Laparotomy Audit-Quality Improvement (ANZELA-QI) from 2018 to 2022. The time elapsed from emergency laparotomy to death was determined for each patient. The cumulative daily mortality rate was calculated for the first 30 days and expressed as a proportion of all emergency laparotomies, and 30-day and in-hospital mortality. Mortality data were compared with those in the only three similar overseas studies. The mortality rate after emergency laparotomy for patients who required but did not undergo surgery was calculated for each hospital. The proportion of patients with high-risk characteristics was compared with that in the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA).

RESULTS

Compared with overseas studies, there was a lower early (within 72 h) mortality rate in ANZELA-QI. Although the lower mortality rate in ANZELA-QI persisted to 30 days, there was a relative increase after 14 days that likely reflected known poor compliance with care standards. Australian patients had fewer high-risk characteristics than those in NELA.

CONCLUSION

The present findings support the hypothesis that the lower mortality rate after emergency laparotomy in Australia is likely a consequence of its national mortality audit and the avoidance of futile surgery.

Consensus Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Emergency Laparotomy Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations Part 2-Emergency Laparotomy: Intra- and Postoperative Care

BACKGROUND

This is Part 2 of the first consensus guidelines for optimal care of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy (EL) using an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) approach. This paper addresses intra- and postoperative aspects of care.

METHODS

Experts in aspects of management of high-risk and emergency general surgical patients were invited to contribute by the International ERAS® Society. PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Medline database searches were performed for ERAS elements and relevant specific topics. Studies on each item were selected with particular attention to randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and large cohort studies and reviewed and graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Recommendations were made on the best level of evidence, or extrapolation from studies on elective patients when appropriate. A modified Delphi method was used to validate final recommendations. Some ERAS® components covered in other guideline papers are outlined only briefly, with the bulk of the text focusing on key areas pertaining specifically to EL.

RESULTS

Twenty-three components of intraoperative and postoperative care were defined. Consensus was reached after three rounds of a modified Delphi Process.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines are based on best available evidence for an ERAS® approach to patients undergoing EL. These guidelines are not exhaustive but pull together evidence on important components of care for this high-risk patient population. As much of the evidence is extrapolated from elective surgery or emergency general surgery (not specifically laparotomy), many of the components need further evaluation in future studies.

Evaluating temporal trends and the impact of surgical subspecialisation on patient outcomes following adhesional small bowel obstruction: a multicentre cohort study

PURPOSE

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is the most common indication for laparotomy in the UK. While general surgeons have become increasingly subspecialised in their elective practice, emergency admissions commonly remain undifferentiated. This study aimed to assess temporal trends in the management of adhesional SBO and explore the influence of subspecialisation on patient outcomes.

METHODS

Data was collected for patients admitted acutely with adhesional SBO across acute NHS trusts in Northern England between 01/01/02 and 31/12/16, including demographics, co-morbidities and procedures performed. Patients were excluded if a potentially non-adhesional cause was identified and were grouped by the responsible consultant's subspecialty. The primary outcome of interest was 30-day inpatient mortality.

RESULTS

Overall, 2818 patients were admitted with adhesional SBO during a 15-year period. There was a consistent female preponderance, but age and comorbidity increased significantly over time (both p < 0.001). In recent years, more patients were managed operatively with a trend away from delayed surgery also evident (2002-2006: 65.7% vs. 2012-2016: 42.7%, p < 0.001). Delayed surgery was associated with an increased mortality risk on multivariable regression analysis (OR: 2.46 (1.46-4.23, p = 0.001)). CT scanning was not associated with management strategy or timing of surgery (p = 0.369). There was an increased propensity for patients to be managed by gastrointestinal (colorectal and upper gastrointestinal) subspecialists over time. Length of stay (p < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (p < 0.001) both improved in recent years, with the best outcomes seen in colorectal (2.6%) and vascular subspecialists (2.4%). However, following adjustment for confounding variables, consultant subspecialty was not a predictor of mortality.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes for patients presenting with adhesional SBO have improved despite the increasing burden of age and co-morbidity. While gastrointestinal subspecialists are increasingly responsible for their care, mortality is not influenced by consultant subspecialty.

Utility of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit prognostic model in predicting outcomes in an Australian health system

The Royal College of Anaesthetists was commissioned by the United Kingdom Health Quality Partnership to conduct the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit of England and Wales (NELA), to compare outcomes of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in order to promote quality improvement. Prior to 2016 there were minimal data for emergency laparotomy patients in Australia. The aim of this cohort study was to assess the utility and applicability of the NELA model in a tertiary centre in Western Australia. NELA-related data of patients who underwent emergency laparotomy, between June 2018 and May 2020, were merged with other administrative databases and clinical records. The discriminative ability and calibration of the model were assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve and calibration plot, respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess whether the NELA-predicted risks were an independent predictor of hospital mortality. Of the 502 patients included, 168 (33.5%) patients had a NELA-predicted risk >10%, and of these, 93 (55.4%) were admitted to a critical care unit in a planned fashion immediately after surgery. The NELA model had a good ability to discriminate between survivors and non-survivors (AUROC 0.892, 95% confidence intervals 0.854 to 0.93, P <0.001). However, the model was not perfectly calibrated, with the predicted risks tending to overestimate the observed risks of mortality, especially when the predicted risks were >50%. A high NELA-predicted risk remained significantly associated with mortality after adjusting for other covariates, including sepsis and plasma lactate concentration, suggesting that it is a reliable screening tool for identifying high-risk patients requiring emergency laparotomy.

Sarcopenia 'made simple' and outcomes from emergency laparotomy

BACKGROUND

Emergency Laparotomy (EL) is recognized as high-risk surgery with high mortality. Established surgical risk assessment tools (NELA Risk Prediction Calculator, P-POSSUM, ACS-NSQIP) are accurate predictors of morbidity and mortality. However, their multicomponent complexity limits their use in practice. Sarcopenia is associated with poorer surgical outcomes. This study tests for an association between a simple measure of radiological sarcopenia and mortality in EL patients in an Australian cohort.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of 500 patients admitted to four Australian hospitals who underwent EL during 2016-2017. All patients had a contemporaneous abdomino-pelvic CT scan. Radiological sarcopenia was measured as the ratio of total psoas muscle area (PM) to L3 vertebral body cross sectional area (PM:L3). Patients were followed up to 12 months. Primary outcomes were 30-, 90- and 365-day mortality.

RESULTS

The mean 30-day mortality predictions for NELA, P-POSSUM and ACS-NSQIP were 11.36%, 17.28% and 11.30% respectively. PM:L3 ratio was associated with 30-, 90- and 365-day mortality (P < 0.001) and sex (P < 0.001) and negatively correlated with age (r = -0.4612; P < 0.001). Radiological sarcopenia had a weak negative correlation with NELA (r = -0.2737; P < 0.001), P-POSSUM (r = -0.1880; P < 0.001) and ACS-NSQIP (r = -0.2351; P < 0.001). The latter three metrics were significantly correlated (r > 0.5696; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Radiological sarcopenia (CT-assessed PM:L3) is a significant predictor of mortality in EL patients in Australia. The results of this study suggest that radiological sarcopenia is equivalent to established risk assessment tools. The more timely and easily accessible CT-assessed PM:L3 metric is potentially automatable and may have significant utility in clinical practice.

Two-year outcomes from the Australian and New Zealand Emergency Laparotomy Audit-Quality Improvement pilot study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the Australian and New Zealand Emergency Laparotomy Audit-Quality Improvement (ANZELA-QI) pilot study was to determine (i) the outcomes of emergency laparotomy (EL) and (ii) the feasibility of a national, multi-disciplinary quality improvement (QI) project based on a bundle of evidence-based care standards.

METHODS

An online database was created using the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) programme. National ethics approval with waiver of consent was obtained. Data were entered directly onto REDCap and extracted monthly for eight care standards (preoperative consultant radiologist reporting of computed tomography scans, preoperative mortality risk score, consultant presence in theatre, timely access to theatre and critical care commensurate with risk and involvement of aged care). Monthly QI run charts using 'traffic' light graphics (green ≥80%, amber ≥50% to <80% and red <50%) reported compliance with the standards.

RESULTS

Sixty hospitals indicated interest, but difficulties with site-specific ethics approval resulted in only 24 hospitals participating (2886 EL in 2755 patients). The overall in-hospital mortality was 7.1% (2.3%-13.3%) and average length of stay 15.5 (8.6-22.7) days. Both significantly declined. Preoperative risk assessment (overall 45%) improved almost three-fold during the study. Only 60% had timely access to theatre and only 70% with a predicted mortality risk of >10% were admitted to critical care.

CONCLUSION

Overall mortality compared favourably with similar international studies and declined in association with participation in the audit. Compliance with some care standards shows considerable scope to improve EL care using QI methodology.

New Zealand and Australia emergency laparotomy mortality rates compare favourably to international outcomes: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Almost 20 000 people undergo an emergency laparotomy each year in New Zealand and Australia. Common indications include small and large bowel obstruction, and intestinal perforation. Considered a high-risk procedure, emergency laparotomy is associated with significantly high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this review was to identify and compare 30-day, 90-day and 1-year mortality rates following emergency laparotomy in New Zealand and Australia.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Electronic searches were performed in Medline, Embase, PubMed and Scopus in April 2020.

RESULTS

Thirty-three papers met the inclusion criteria. Studies ranged in size from 58 to 75 280 patients. Weighted mean 30-day mortality was 8.40% (8.39-8.41). Mortality rates increased with longer postoperative follow up with 90-day weighted mortality rate of 14.14% (14.13-14.15) and the weighted mortality rate at 1 year of 24.60% (24.56-24.66). There was significant variability in mortality rates between countries.

CONCLUSION

There is a wide variability of 30-day, 90-day and 1-year mortality rates internationally. Lowering postoperative mortality rates following emergency laparotomy through quality improvement initiatives could result in up to 120 lives in New Zealand and over 250 lives in Australia being saved each year. The continued work of the Australian and New Zealand Emergency Laparotomy Audit - Quality Improvement is crucial to improving emergency laparotomy mortality rates further in New Zealand and Australia.

Evaluating outcomes following emergency laparotomy in the North of England and the impact of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit - A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Emergency laparotomy is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Current trends suggest improvements have been made in recent years, with increased survival and shorter lengths of stay in hospital. The National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) has evaluated participating hospitals in England and Wales and their individual outcomes since 2013. This study aims to establish temporal trends for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy and evaluate the influence of NELA.

METHODS

Data for emergency laparotomies admitted to NHS hospitals in the Northern Deanery between 2001 and 2016 were collected, including demographics, co-morbidities, diagnoses, operations undertaken and outcomes. The primary outcome of interest was in-hospital death within 30 days of admission. Cox-regression analysis was undertaken with adjustment for covariates.

RESULTS

There were 2828 in-hospital deaths from 24,291 laparotomies within 30 days of admission (11.6%). Overall 30-day mortality significantly reduced during the 15-year period studied from 16.3% (2001-04), to 8.1% during 2013-16 (p < 0.001). After multivariate adjustment, laparotomies undertaken in more recent years were associated with a lower mortality risk compared to earlier years (2013-16: HR 0.73, p < 0.001). There was a significant improvement in 30-day postoperative mortality year-on-year during the NELA period (from 9.1 to 7.1%, p = 0.039). However, there was no difference in postoperative mortality for patients who underwent laparotomy during NELA (2013-16) compared with the preceding three years (both 8.1%, p = 0.526).

DISCUSSION

30 day postoperative mortality for emergency laparotomy has improved over the past 15-years, with significantly reduced mortality risk in recent years. However, it is unclear if NELA has yet had a measurable effect on 30-day post-operative mortality.

Management and outcomes of ruptured, perforated or fistulized tumors of mesenchymal origin

BACKGROUND

Patients with ruptured, perforated or fistulized (RPF) sarcomas commonly have issues such as sepsis and malnutrition and are usually unsuitable for oncologic resection in the emergency setting. We present our approach for managing a series of patients and the outcomes which were achieved with multidisciplinary care.

METHODS

We reviewed records of patients referred to the section of sarcoma surgical oncology. Clinicopathologic factors, preoperative and operative interventions as well as short-term oncologic outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were identified between 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2018. Median age was 42.8 years. Histologies were; Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (7), desmoid (4), spindle cell tumor (2), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (2), and nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (1). Five patients had preoperative sepsis, 8 received antimicrobials, and 50% required hospitalization with a median stay of 21 days. Total parenteral nutrition was administered to 5 (31.3%) patients. Median tumor size and estimated blood loss were 13.1 cm and 350 mL respectively. No perioperative mortality occurred. Two patients have expired at a median follow-up of 16.1 months.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative optimization, including the use of percutaneous drains, and antibiotics to control sepsis, where necessary, can lead to eventual oncologic resection with acceptable morbidity and no short-term mortality for patients with RPF sarcomas.

Intra-abdominal pressure may be elevated in patients with open abdomen after emergent laparotomy

PURPOSE

To estimate the change in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) among critically ill patient who were left with open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure after laparotomy, during the first 48 h after admission.

METHODS

A cohort study in a single ICU in a tertiary care hospital. All adult patients admitted to the ICU after emergent laparotomy for acute abdomen or trauma, who were left with temporary abdominal closure (TAC), were included. Patients were followed up to 48 h. IAP was routinely measured at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after admission to ICU.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were included, 34 were operated due to acute abdomen and 5 due to abdominal trauma. Seventeen patients were treated with skin closure, 13 with Bogota bag, and 9 with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Eleven patients (28.2%) had IAP of 15 mmHg or above at time 0, (mean pressure 19.0 ± 3.0 mmHg), and it dropped to 12 ± 4 mmHg within 48 h (p < 0.01). Reduction in lactate level (2.4 ± 1.0 to 1.2 ± 0.2 mmol/L, p < 0.01) and increase in PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio (163 ± 34 to 231 ± 83, p = 0.03) were observed as well after 48 h.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first large report of IAP in open abdomen. Elevated IAP may be measured in open abdomen and may subsequently relieve after 48 h.