Regional versus metropolitan pancreaticoduodenectomy mortality in Australia

The provision of general surgery in rural Australia: a narrative review

Rural surgery is most commonly provided by general surgeons to the 29% of people (7 million) living in rural Australia. The provision of rural general surgery to enable equitable and safe surgical care for rural Australians is a multifaceted issue concerning recruitment, training, retention, surgical procedures and surgical outcomes. Sustaining the rural general surgical workforce will be dependent upon growing an increased number of resident rural general surgeons, as well as changed models of care, with a need for ongoing review to track the outcomes of these changes. To increase recruitment, rural general surgical training must improve to be less stressful for trainees and to be incorporated alongside a rural-facing generalist curriculum. Rural general surgical outcomes (excluding some oncology conditions) achieve comparable results to metropolitan centres. Access to, and outcomes of, surgical oncology services continues to be inequitable for rural Australians and should be a major focus for improved service delivery.

Gastrectomy mortality in Australia

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in medical management and endoscopic therapy, gastrectomy remains an important yet high-risk procedure for a range of benign and malignant upper gastrointestinal pathologies. No study has previously analysed Australian gastrectomy perioperative mortality rate (POMR). This retrospective, population-based cohort study was conducted to determine the Australian national gastrectomy POMR, allowing state-based and regional trends and outcomes to be assessed.

METHODS

Logistic regression models were compared using de-identified procedural data between 1 July 2005 and 30 June 2017 from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Codes relating to total and subtotal gastrectomy contained in the Australian Classification of Health Interventions were used to extract patient data. Mortality rates were risk adjusted for age and gender. Temporal trends and differences between states/territories and regions were investigated.

RESULTS

The national average POMR throughout the study period was 2.1%. For subtotal gastrectomy, the national mean POMR was 1.1%, decreasing from 2.7% (2005) to 1.3% (2017). For total gastrectomy, the national mean POMR was 2.8%, decreasing from 3.3% (2005) to 1.7% (2017). POMR significantly reduced over time without variation between states or regions. Procedure volume steadily reduced in rural centres with a concomitant increase in metropolitan centres over time.

CONCLUSION

Pleasingly, the Australian gastrectomy POMR is favourable when compared to international cohorts. Improved outcomes were consistent between states and territories, and metropolitan and regional centres. Progressive metropolitan centralization of gastrectomy was demonstrated without evidence of improved outcomes.

Transitioning to a high volume centre for Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy in Western Australia: a single centre experience

BACKGROUND

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a curative resection for peri-ampullary tumours associated with high rates of peri-operative mortality and morbidity. The global trend is towards the establishment of high volume centres to reduce this. Australia faces geographical and population distribution challenges. Western Australia has centralized PD to two centres and we present the results of our institution in transitioning to a high volume centre.

METHODS

This was a prospective database of all PDs performed at our institution from 1 January 2005 to 2 April 2020. Mortality outcomes included peri-operative, 30 day and 90 day mortality. Complications, readmission and reinterventions at 90 days were recorded. The annual volume exceeded 20 from 2015. Outcomes prior to this were compared to characterize the transition to a high volume centre.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty eight PDs were performed in Period 1 (1 January 2005-31 December 2014) and 170 in the high volume Period 2 (1 January 2015-2 April 2020). There was a non-statistically significant reduction in 90 day mortality in Period 2 (4.69% versus 1.18%, p = 0.06). There was a reduction in clinically significant post-operative pancreatic fistulas (31.25% versus 11.76%, p < 0.05), delayed gastric emptying (39.84% versus 22.35%, p < 0.05) and transfusion requirements (56.25% versus 17.65%, p < 0.05). Severe complications (Clavien-Dindo III or greater) were reduced (30.47% versus 18.24%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Since establishing a high volume service, there was a reduction in post-operative complications and 90 day mortality. This is in line with outcomes from international centres and demonstrates the improvements that can be made.

Pancreatic cancer in Australia: is not it time we address the inequitable resource problem?

The present study reviewed the geographical variations in the delivery of pancreatic cancer therapy and whether this impacts overall survival. The evidence suggests a difference in the accessibility of pancreatic cancer care to patients in rural as compared with urban Australia. While centralization of pancreatic surgery is essential to deliver high quality care to patients, it may be interfering with the ease of access of this form of care to patients in regional areas. Access to chemotherapy in regional Australia is also limited. There is need for a concerted effort to improve the overall care and uptake of medical services to patients in metropolitan and remote Australia with the overarching aim of improving survival and meaningful quality of life.