Anatomical features of inferior mesenteric and left colic arteries and surgery in colorectal cancer patients with persistent descending mesocolon

Transverse Colon Volvulus Secondary to the Persistent Descending Mesocolon: A Case Report

This case report introduces a rare occurrence of transverse colon volvulus associated with persistent descending mesocolon (PDM), a congenital anomaly characterized by the medial positioning of the descending colon due to a failed fusion with the dorsal abdominal wall. We detail the case of an 18-year-old female, with a medical history of surgically corrected coarctation of the aorta and anal atresia, who presented with recurrent transverse colon volvulus despite having undergone a laparoscopic colopexy three years earlier. Physical examination revealed abdominal distension and metallic colic sounds while imaging studies confirmed the recurrence of the volvulus. Laparoscopic partial resection of the transverse colon was performed, which revealed a medially positioned descending colon due to PDM. Postoperative complications included anastomotic failure, necessitating a second operation. The patient was successfully discharged without further complications after seven days. This case underscores the clinical significance of recognizing PDM, highlighting its potential role in causing transverse colon volvulus and increasing the risk of anastomotic failure. It emphasizes the need for surgeons to remain vigilant regarding this congenital anomaly to mitigate unexpected outcomes such as recurrent volvulus and postoperative complications.

Radiological characteristics and diagnostic clues for persistent descending mesocolon in patients with rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Persistent descending mesocolon (PDM) increases the difficulty and colonic ischemia in the surgery of colorectal cancer, but the preoperative diagnostic criteria have not yet been clearly demonstrated. This study explored the MR imaging features and diagnostic criteria of PDM to improve the preoperative diagnostic rate.

METHODS

The clinical data of 54 patients with PDM and 270 patients without PDM who underwent rectal surgery at the Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, from March 2018 to December 2022 were analyzed, retrospectively. The radiological parameters of PDM from MRI were analyzed.

RESULTS

On MRI T2WI axial image, the left edge of the abdominal aorta was defined as the reference line. The shortest vertical distance between the right edge of the descending colon and this line (dN) and the maximum transverse diameter of the peritoneal cavity (dA) at the same level and the maximum vertical distance between the right edge of the descending colon and this line (dW) were measured. There were significant statistical differences in dN, dW, dN/dW, and dN/dA between the PDM group and the non-PDM group. dN, dN/dW, and dN/dA have high diagnostic performance for the PDM. dN < 4.16 cm, dN/dW < 0.52, and dN/dA < 0.15 can all be used as clues to diagnose PDM.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a feasible set of diagnostic criteria for PDM based on abdominal MRI, which can quickly and accurately diagnose PDM, and provide some reference for preoperative planning and surgical decision-making.

Benefits of a laparoscopic approach for second colorectal resection after colectomy or proctectomy -a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

A laparoscopic approach generally provides several benefits in patients who undergo colon or rectal surgery without jeopardizing oncological outcomes. However, there is a paucity of studies on comparative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open approaches for second primary colorectal lesions after colectomy or proctectomy.

METHODS

From patients with colorectal disease who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2022 at our hospital, we collected 69 consecutive patients who had previous colorectal surgery for this retrospective study. Based on the second surgery approach (laparoscopic or open), patients were classified into the Lap (n = 37) or Op group (n = 32). Patients' baseline data and perioperative and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Four patients (11%) of the Lap group needed conversion to laparotomy. The intraoperative blood loss was lower in the Lap group than the Op group (median: 45 ml vs. 205 ml, p = 0.001). The time to first bowel movement was shorter in the Lap group than the Op group (median: 2.8 days vs. 3.6 days, p = 0.007). The operative time, frequencies of postoperative morbidities, and overall survival did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic surgery appeared feasible and beneficial for selected patients undergoing second colorectal resection after colectomy or proctectomy regarding blood loss and bowel function recovery without affecting other outcomes.

Persistent descending mesocolon as a vital risk factor for anastomotic failure and prolonged operative time for sigmoid colon and rectal cancers

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic criteria and effect of persistent descending mesocolon (PDM) on sigmoid and rectal cancers (SRCs) remain controversial. This study aims to clarify PDM patients' radiological features and short-term surgical results.

METHOD

From January 2020 to December 2021, radiological imaging data from 845 consecutive patients were retrospectively analyzed using multiplanar reconstruction (MRP) and maximum intensity projection (MIP). PDM is defined as the condition wherein the right margin of the descending colon is located medially to the left renal hilum. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize database bias. The anatomical features and surgical results of PDM patients were compared with those of non-PDM patients.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients with PDM and 813 patients with non-PDM were enrolled into the study who underwent laparoscopic resection. After 1:4 matching, patients were stratified into PDM (n = 27) and non-PDM (n = 105) groups. The lengths from the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) to the inferior mesenteric vein (1.6 cm vs. 2.5 cm, p = 0.001), IMA to marginal artery arch (2.7 cm vs. 8.4 cm, p = 0.001), and IMA to the colon (3.3 cm vs. 10.2 cm, p = 0.001) were significantly shorter in the PDM group than those in the non-PDM group. The conversion to open surgery (11.1% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.008), operative time (210 min vs. 163 min, p = 0.001), intraoperative blood loss (50 ml vs. 30 ml, p = 0.002), marginal arch injury (14.8% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.006), splenic flexure free (22.2% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.005), Hartmann procedure (18.5% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.001) and anastomosis failure (18.5% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.001) were significantly higher in the PDM group. Moreover, PDM was an independent risk factor for prolonged operative time (OR = 3.205, p = 0.004) and anastomotic failure (OR = 7.601, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

PDM was an independent risk factor for prolonged operative time and anastomotic failure in SRCs surgery. Preoperative radiological evaluation using MRP and MIP can help surgeons better handle this rare congenital variant.