The potential impact of new diagnostic criteria on the frequency of gestational diabetes mellitus in Sweden

Hemoglobin A1c as screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in Nordic Caucasian women

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) increases the risk for preeclampsia and macrosomia. GDM is conventionally diagnosed by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is a marker for the average glucose level the last 2-3 months. We aimed to study if HbA1c alone or in combination with patient characteristics can be used to screen for GDM and reduce the number of OGTTs, and whether it could predict preeclampsia or birth weight.

METHODS

855 women from a previous study on the effect of exercise on GDM prevalence were eligible, whereof 677 were included. GDM was diagnosed by WHO 1999 criteria (GDM-WHO) and modified IADPSG criteria (GDM-IADPSG), at pregnancy weeks 18-22 and 32-36. HbA1c analyzed at pregnancy weeks 18-22 and 32-36, variables from patient history and clinical examination were considered for logistic regression models. The diagnostic accuracy was assessed by ROC curve analysis.

RESULTS

Accumulated GDM prevalence was 6.7 % by WHO and 7.2 % by modified IADPSG criteria. Nearly a third could potentially have avoided an OGTT by using HbA1c to exclude GDM-IADPSG with a sensitivity of 88 % at week 18-22 and 97 % at week 32-36. Further, 16 % could have avoided an OGTT with a sensitivity of 96 % using HbA1c at week 18-22 to exclude GDM-IADPSG throughout pregnancy. HbA1c was not accurate at diagnosing GDM-IADPSG, and it was inaccurate at screening for GDM-WHO at any time point. Adding other predictors did not increase the number of potentially avoidable OGTTs significantly. HbA1c was not significantly associated with preeclampsia or birth weight.

CONCLUSIONS

HbA1c could potentially reduce the number of OGTTs.

HbA1c as screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preeclampsia and macrosomia. Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are at increased risk of developing GDM. Today, GDM is diagnosed by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), a rather cumbersome test for the women and health care system. The objectives of this study were to investigate whether HbA1c in first trimester of pregnancy could be used as a screening test for GDM in first trimester and throughout pregnancy in order to reduce the number of OGTTs, and whether it could predict preeclampsia and macrosomia in women with PCOS.

METHODS

Post hoc analyses of data from 228 women from a prospective, randomised, multicenter study comparing metformin to placebo from first trimester to delivery. Fasting and 2-h plasma glucose were measured during a 75 g OGTT in first trimester, gestational week 19 and 32 as well as fasting plasma glucose in gestational week 36. GDM was diagnosed by WHO criteria from 1999 in first trimester and throughout pregnancy and by modified IADPSG criteria (i.e. lacking the 1-h plasma glucose value) in first trimester. The diagnostic accuracy was assessed by logistic regression and ROC curve analysis.

RESULTS

The area under the ROC curve for first trimester HbA1c for screening of GDM diagnosed by WHO criteria in first trimester was 0.60 (95 % CI 0.44-0.75) and 0.56 (95 % CI 0.47-0.65) for GDM diagnosed throughout pregnancy. Only 2.2 % (95 % CI 0.7-5.1 %) of the participants could have avoided OGTT. HbA1c was not statistically significantly associated with GDM diagnosed by modified IADPSG criteria in first trimester. However, first trimester HbA1c was statistically significantly associated with preeclampsia. Both HbA1c and GDM by WHO criteria in first trimester, but not by IADPSG, were negatively associated with birth weight.

CONCLUSION

First trimester HbA1c can not be used to exclude or predict GDM in women with PCOS, but it might be better to predict preeclampsia than the GDM diagnosis.

Role of HbA1c in post-partum screening of women with gestational diabetes mellitus

Aim

To compare the performance of HbA1c with established glucose criteria during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and to assess HbA1c as a screening test for undiagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes after gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Methods

Glucose homeostasis was re-evaluated 1–5 years after delivery in 140 women with previous GDM, by means of OGTT and simultaneous HbA1c measurement. Glucose tolerance was defined according to World Health Organisation criteria. HbA1c ≥6.5% (≥48 mmol/mol) was used for diabetes diagnosis and HbA1c ≥5.7% (≥39 mmol/mol) to define abnormal glucose homeostasis.

Results

HbA1c had low sensitivity (14.3%) and high specificity (99.1%) in diabetes diagnosis. Sensitivity and specificity of HbA1c to detect abnormal glucose tolerance were 29.5% and 95.2%, respectively. The consistency in classifying abnormal glucose tolerance between HbA1c and OGTT criteria was 59% (κ = 0.227) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.708. The combined use of HbA1c and fasting glucose criteria showed similar performance to that of fasting glucose criteria alone. The latter identified 63% of the women with pre-diabetes or diabetes in the study cohort. However, by lowering the cut-point of HbA1c to ≥5.0% (≥31 mmol/mol), an additional proportion (27%) with isolated post-glucose load hyperglycaemia was identified.

Conclusion

Proposed thresholds of HbA1c had low diagnostic sensitivity. Combined with a fasting glucose test, the performance was no better than with using a fasting glucose test alone. Combining a fasting glucose test with a lower HbA1c cut-point may be an alternative approach for selection of women for an OGTT.

•

We compare the performance of HbA1c with established glucose criteria during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).

•

We also assess HbA1c as a screening test for undiagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes after gestational diabetes mellitus.

•

Proposed thresholds of HbA1c had low diagnostic sensitivity relative to OGTT.

•

Combining HbA1c with a fasting glucose test the performance was no better than using a fasting glucose test alone.

•

Combining a fasting glucose test with a lower HbA1c cut-point may be an option for selection of women for an OGTT.