Cervical ripening balloon compared with vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term: A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate vaginal delivery in obese women who underwent cervical ripening at term using a dinoprostone vaginal insert or a cervical ripening balloon (CRB), and to assess maternal and neonatal morbidity according to the method.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study including obese women with a live singleton fetus in cephalic presentation who required cervical ripening at term (≥37 weeks) for maternal and/or fetal disease using a dinoprostone vaginal insert or a CRB. The primary outcome was vaginal delivery. Secondary outcomes were a favorable cervix (Bishop score >6) after 24 h, the time from device insertion to delivery, and composite maternal and neonatal morbidity.

RESULTS

In total, 135 consecutive women were analyzed (107 CRB, 79.3%; 28 dinoprostone vaginal insert, 20.7%). Vaginal delivery (86 [80.4%] after CRB vs 19 [67.9%] after dinoprostone vaginal insert; P = 0.248), favorable cervix within 24 h after device placement (52 [48.6%] vs 17 [60.7%]; P = 0.264), and maternal morbidity (12 [11.2%] vs 4 [14.3%]; P = 0.646) were similar between the groups. The time from device insertion to delivery also did not differ between the groups. Neonatal morbidity was significantly higher after the dinoprostone vaginal insert (11 [39.3%] vs 20 [18.7%]; P = 0.030). Cervical ripening using the dinoprostone vaginal insert, compared with the CRB, was significantly associated with neonatal morbidity (adjusted odds ratio 4.00, 95% confidence interval 1.34-12.5), but not with maternal morbidity (adjusted odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 0.30-4.38).

CONCLUSIONS

Vaginal delivery, a favorable cervix after 24 h, the time from device insertion to delivery, and maternal morbidity did not significantly differ between the CRB and the dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening in obese women at term. Nevertheless, neonatal morbidity was significantly associated with the dinoprostone vaginal insert, compared with the CRB, among obese women who required cervical ripening at term.

Obesity at term: What to consider? How to deliver?

Obesity presents significant challenges during pregnancy, increasing the risk of complications and adverse outcomes for both mother and baby. With the rising prevalence of obesity among pregnant women, questions arise regarding optimal management, including timing of delivery and choice of delivery mode. Labour induction in obese women may require a combination of mechanical and pharmacological methods due to increased risk of failed induction. Caesarean section in obese women presents unique challenges, requiring comprehensive perioperative planning and specialized care to optimize outcomes. However, specific guidelines tailored to obese patients undergoing caesarean sections are lacking. Postpartum care should include vigilant monitoring for complications. Addressing obesity in pregnancy necessitates a multidisciplinary approach and specialized care to ensure the best outcomes.

Challenges in timing and mode of delivery in morbidly obese women

Globally obesity is increasing especially in the reproductive age group. Pregnant women with obesity have higher complication and intervention rates. They are also at increased risk of stillbirth and intrapartum complications. Although organisations like NICE, RCOG, ACOG and WHO have published guidelines and recommendations on care of pregnant women with obesity the evidence from which Grade A recommendations can be made on timing and how to deliver is limited. The current advice is therefore to have discussions with the woman on risks to help her make an informed decision about timing, place, and mode of delivery. Obesity is an independent risk factor for pregnancy complications including diabetes, hypertension and macrosomia. In those with these complications, the timing of delivery is often influenced by the severity of the complication. As an independent factor, population based observational studies in obese women have shown an increase in the risk of stillbirth. This risk increases linearly with weight from overweight through to class II obesity, but then rises sharply in those with class III obesity by at least 10-fold beyond 42 weeks when compared to normal weight women. This risk of stillbirth is notably higher in obese women from 34 weeks onwards compared to normal weight women. One modifiable risk factor for stillbirth as shown from various cohorts of pregnant women is prolonged pregnancy. Research has linked obesity to prolonged pregnancy. Although the exact mechanism is yet unknown some have linked this to maternal dysregulation of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis leading to hormonal imbalance delaying parturition. For these women the two dilemmas are when and how best to deliver. In this review, we examine the evidence and make recommendations on the timing and mode of delivery in women with obesity. For class I obese women there are no differences in outcome with regards to timing and mode of delivery when compared to lean weight women. However, for class II and III obesity, planned induction or caesarean sections may be associated with a lower perinatal morbidity and mortality although this may be associated with an increased in maternal morbidity especially in class III obesity. Studies have shown that delivery by 39 weeks is associated with lower perinatal mortality compared to delivering after in these women. On balance the evidence would favour planned delivery (induction or caesarean section) before 40 weeks of gestation. In the morbidly obese, apart from the standard lower transverse skin incision for CS, there is evidence that a supraumbilical transverse incision may reduce morbidity but is less cosmetic. Irrespective of the option adopted, it is important to discuss the pros and cons of each.

Association of maternal Body Mass Index and parity on induced labor stages

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a widespread pandemic and obstetric care must adapt to meet the needs of obese pregnant women. Little is known about the impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on the induction of labor (IOL). Therefore, our objective was to evaluate if the duration of the first and second stages of IOL is affected by maternal BMI in nulliparous and multiparous women.

METHODS

We included singleton pregnancies at term with cephalic presentation whose labor was induced from June 2018 to December 2019. Women were divided into two groups according to pre-pregnancy BMI in normal weight and obese women.

RESULTS

A total of 668 women with IOL were included in the study, among them, 349 had a normal weight and 321 were obese. The first stage of labor was longer in obese multiparous than normal-weight women (normal weight 81.98±71.7 vs. obese 134.3±158.1 min, P=0.000), while the second stage resulted significantly shorter (normal weight 22.2±27.8 vs. obese 14.3±14.2 min, P=0.000). The total time elapsed from IOL beginning and delivery was significantly higher in obese nulliparous (normal weight 10.4±19.7 vs. obese 22.0±26.2 h, P=0.000). Operative vaginal deliveries, emergency cesarean section, and failed IOL resulted to be similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Obese multiparous women have longer first stages of labor while shorter second stages. The total time for induced obese nulliparous to reach delivery is higher than the normal weight. It might be reasonable to reconsider the partographs according to maternal BMI in case of induced labor for future obstetric practice.

Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction With Pain Relief and Birth Experience Among Induced and Spontaneous-onset Labours Ending in Vaginal Birth: A Prospective Cohort Study

Objective

To assess pain relief and overall birth experience in induced vs. spontaneous-onset labours and to clarify variables among induced parturients determining satisfaction and dissatisfaction.

Study design

A prospective study of 2042 women. 575 women with induced and 1467 with spontaneous-onset labour answered multiple questions in a questionnaire regarding the experience of birth giving. Satisfaction was numerically assessed via a visual analogue scale (VAS 0-10).

Results

Induction of labour (IOL) did not worsen the average experience of pain relief, but the proportion of women dissatisfied with pain relief was slightly higher after IOL compared with spontaneous-onset labour (SOL). IOL was associated with lower satisfaction with overall birth experience compared with SOL (VAS 8.0 vs. 8.4; p < 0.001). Among IOL parturients incorrect timing of pain relief was strongly associated with dissatisfaction with pain relief, as were deficient information and induction with misoprostol. Epidural blockade was the most important factor preventing dissatisfaction with pain relief. Unsatisfactory overall experience of birth was associated with deficient pain relief, its incorrect timing or deficient information, as well as vacuum extraction as the mode of delivery.

Conclusions

Induction of labour is a risk factor of dissatisfaction regarding pain relief and overall birth experience. The strongest impact on dissatisfaction among induced parturients concerning pain relief was delayed timing of effective labour analgesia. Poor pain relief, its incorrect timing and deficient information on pain relief were strong predictive factors of dissatisfaction with the overall birth experience.

Impact of pre-pregnancy obesity on cesarean delivery rates in nulliparous pregnant people undergoing induction of labor

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of pre-pregnancy obesity on the cesarean delivery rate in nulliparous pregnant people undergoing induction of labor.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study of nulliparous pregnant people with a normal weight and obesity who underwent induction of labor between 37 and 41 weeks gestation at a single institution from 2012 to 2018. Weight category was based on pre-pregnancy body mass index. The primary outcome was rate of cesarean delivery. Additional demographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed. A chi square test was used to compare the cesarean delivery rates. Multivariate logistic regression was used to generate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) controlling for potential cofounders.

RESULTS

Of the 557 pregnancies identified, 88/285 (31%) of pregnant people with a normal weight had a cesarean delivery while 165/263 (63%) of pregnant people with obesity had a cesarean delivery (cOR 3.8, 95% CI 2.6-5.4). After adjustment, pregnant people with obesity remained more likely to have a cesarean delivery compared to pregnant people with a normal weight (aOR 2.7, 95% CI 1.8-4.0). Further, cesarean delivery was more likely in those with an unfavorable modified Bishop score (aOR 3.4, 95% CI 1.8-6.5) and gestational weight gain above the Institute of Medicine recommendation (aOR 2.6, 95% CI 1.8-3.9). The rate of cesarean delivery was not different by class of obesity (p = .32).

CONCLUSION

Pre-pregnancy obesity is associated with higher cesarean delivery rates in nulliparous pregnant people undergoing induction of labor compared with normal pre-pregnancy body mass index. Gestational weight gain above the Institute of Medicine recommendations and having an unfavorable modified Bishop score at the time of induction are associated with increased cesarean delivery rates.

Breaking the myth: the association between the increasing incidence of labour induction and the rate of caesarean delivery in Finland - a nationwide Medical Birth Register study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the association between the rate of labour induction and caesarean delivery.

DESIGN

Medical Birth Register-based study. We used data from the nationwide Medical Birth Register collecting data on delivery outcomes on all births from 22+0 weeks and/or birth weight of at least 500 g.

SETTING

Finland.

PARTICIPANTS

663 024 live births in Finland from 2008 to 2019.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The rates of labour induction and caesarean delivery.

RESULTS

The rate of labour induction increased from 17.8% to 30.3%; p<0.001, during the study. The total caesarean delivery rate was 16.5% (n=109 178). An increase of approximately 0.5% in the caesarean delivery rate occurred during the study period. The rate of caesarean delivery following labour induction slightly decreased (15.41% vs 15.35%; p<0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, induction of labour was associated with a reduced risk for caesarean delivery (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.74). The frequency of advanced maternal age (18.0% vs 23.5%; p<0.001), obesity (11.4% vs 15.1%; p<0.001) and gestational diabetes (9.8% vs 23.3%; p<0.001) increased during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The 70% increase in the rate of labour induction in Finland has not led to a significant increase in the rate of caesarean delivery, which has remained one of the lowest in the world. Pregnant women in Finland are more frequently obese, older and diagnosed with gestational diabetes, which may partly explain the increase in the rate of labour induction.

Vaginal Dinoprostone Insert versus Cervical Ripening Balloon for Term Induction of Labor in Obese Nulliparas-A Randomized Controlled Trial

Data regarding the preferred induction method in women with obesity is scarce. The current study was aimed at comparing pharmacological and mechanical induction in this population. This prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted between 2016−2020, in nulliparas with a pre-pregnancy body mass index >30. Inclusion criteria were singleton-term pregnancies, bishop score < 5, and indication for induction. Patients were randomized to induction by a cervical ripening balloon (CRB) or a 10 mg vaginal dinoprostone insert. The primary outcome was delivery rate within 24 h. Secondary outcomes included time to delivery, cesarean section rate, maternal and neonatal outcomes, satisfaction, and anxiety. The study population comprised of 83 women in the CRB group and 81 in the dinoprostone group. There was a significant difference in delivery rates within 24 h and time to delivery between the dinoprostone and CRB groups (45% vs. 71%, p = 0.017 and 49.3 ± 6.8 h vs. 23.5 ± 5.9 h, p = 0.003, respectively). There were no differences in cesarean delivery rates or maternal and neonatal outcomes, though CRB induction was associated with a significantly lower rate of tachysystole. Induction with CRB was accompanied by higher satisfaction and lower anxiety. In summary, CRB induction is associated with shorter time to delivery, higher satisfaction, and lower anxiety compared to PGE2 in women with obesity, without compromising maternal or neonatal outcomes.

Proportion and Outcome of Induction of Labor Among Mothers Who Delivered in Teaching Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia

Background: Despite the induction of labor (IOL) having had some undesired consequences, it also has several benefits for maternal and perinatal outcomes. This study aimed to assess the proportion and outcome of IOL among mothers who delivered in Teaching Hospital, southwest Ethiopia.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted from June 10 to June 20, 2019, among 294 mothers who gave birth between November 30, 2018, and May 30, 2019, by reviewing their cards using a structured checklist to assess the prevalence, outcome, and consequences of induction of labor. A binary logistic regression analysis was computed to look for the association between outcome variables and independent variables.

Results: The prevalence of labor induction was 20.4%. The most commonly reported cause of induction was preeclampsia (41.6%). The factors associated with IOL were mothers aged 25–34 years [AOR = 2.55, 95% CI (1.18–5.50)] and ≥35 years [AOR = 10.6, 95% CI (4.20–26.9)], having no history of antenatal care [AOR = 2.12, 95% CI (1.10–4.07)], and being Primipara AOR = 2.33, 95% CI (1.18–3.24)]. Of the 60 induced mothers, 23.3% had failed induction. The proportion of mothers with dead fetal outcomes and maternal complications was 5 and 41.7%, respectively. The unfavorable Bishop Score before induction [AOR = 1.85, 95% CI (1.32–4.87)] and induction using misoprostol [AOR = 1.48, 95% CI (1.24–5.23)] were the factors associated with failed induction of labor.

Conclusion: The prevalence of induced labor was considerably higher than rates in other Ethiopian studies; however, the prevalence of induction failure was comparable to other studies done in Ethiopia. The study found that Bishop's unfavorable score before induction and induction using misoprostol was the factor associated with unsuccessful induction. Therefore, the health professionals should confirm the favorability of the cervical status before the IOL to increase the success rate of induction of labor.

Induction of labour in pregnant individuals with obesity

People with obesity may require induction of labour (IoL) due to a higher incidence of pre-existing comorbidities and pregnancy complications, as well as to prevent post-term pregnancies and late-term stillbirths. IoL at 39-40 weeks is associated with fewer caesarean births and lower morbidity for the pregnant person and neonate when compared with expectant management. Ensuring the success and safety of IoL in people with obesity requires adherence to evidence-based protocols for the management of labour induction and augmentation. Cervical ripening as well as the latent and active phases of labour in people with obesity may be considerably prolonged, requiring higher cumulative doses of oxytocin. This should be guided by intrauterine pressure catheters and early provision of neuraxial analgesia, where possible. There is insufficient evidence to recommend one method of IoL over another. The need for higher doses of prostaglandins and concurrent agents for cervical ripening should be studied in prospective studies.

Is Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Safe for the Induction of Labor in High-Risk Pregnancy Obese Women?

Induction of labor (IOL) is an event that occurs in up to 25% of pregnancies. In Europe, the misoprostol vaginal insert (MVI-Misodel®) was approved for labor induction in 2013. Studies on the outcomes and safety of IOL in obese pregnant women are scarce; no data are available on MVI IOL in high-risk pregnancy obese women (HRPO-late-term, hypertension, diabetes). As the obesity rates are growing steadily in pregnant women, we aimed to evaluate the failure rate for induction and the safety of a 200 μg MVI in obese (body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2) HRPO compared to that for obese non-high-risk pregnancies (non-HRPO). For this purpose, we conducted a cross-sectional study in "Filantropia" Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania, from June 2017-the date of the initiation of the MVI IOL protocol in our clinic-to September 2019. The primary outcomes were the failure rate, measured by cesarean section (CS) ratio, and secondarily, the safety profile of MVI, analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Out of a total of 11,096 registered live births, IOL was performed on 206 obese patients. Of these, 74 obese pregnant women had their labor induced with MVI (HRPO, n = 57, and non-HRPO, n = 17). The average maternal age was 29.9 ± 4.8 years (19-44 years). Across the groups, the rate of CS was 29.8% (n = 17) in the HRPO group compared to 23.5% (n = 4) in the non-HRPO group (p = non significant). In the vaginally birth subgroups, the median time from drug administration to delivery was shorter in the HRPO group compared to the non-HRPO group (16.9 ± 6.0 h 95% confidence interval (CI) 15.0-18.8 vs. 19.4 ± 9.2 h 95% CI 13.8-25.0, p = 0.03). No significant differences were found regarding the maternal outcomes among the studied groups; in terms of perinatal outcomes of safety, 5.4% (n = 4) of the cases of vaginal delivery for HRPO were associated with neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions. The MVI seems to be an efficient labor induction agent in high-risk pregnancy obese women with good maternal outcomes and low perinatologic complications.

Single versus double application of vaginal dinoprostone: maternal factors affecting responsiveness

Purpose: The aim of our study was to identify maternal characteristics of women who are responsive to the second application of vaginal dinoprostone in a cohort of patients with a low Bishop Score. Secondarily, we compared the outcome of the patients' response to a single application to that of the women's response to a double application. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective observational cohort study. Patients undergoing preinduction of labor with dinoprostone 10mg controlled-release vaginal device were included. Results: Among 216 included patients, 192 women (88.9%) achieved a cervical ripening after a single application of dinoprostone, while 24 (11.1%) required a second application. Patients notresponding to the first application of dinoprostone had a significantly higher body mass index (27.4 ± 6.7 kg/m² vs 24.9 ± 5.2 kg/m²; p < 0.05) and a significant increase in gestational weight gain (14 ± 5.2 kg vs 11.6 ± 6.1; p < 0.005). Double application of dinoprostone resulted in spontaneousdelivery in 58.4% of cases, but it was related to poorer neonatal outcome, compared to a single application. Conclusions: Obese women, not responding to the first application of dinoprostone could respond to the second application of this vaginal prostaglandin. However, data related to the use of a double application are still very limited to recommend its use as a standardized procedurefor not responsive patients.

Evaluation of maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnancy with high BMI

BACKGROUND

Maternal obesity is a significant risk factor for unfavourable outcomes during pregnancy. However, the extent of this relationship is poorly defined in Irish mothers.

AIMS

This study was to compare maternal and perinatal outcomes between obese and non-obese mothers in an Irish population.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study was conducted in a secondary level maternity unit for births recorded between January 2018 and January 2019 and 2,793 women were included. BMI calculated at booking visit was used to compare obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) and non-obese mothers (BMI < 30 kg/m²).

RESULTS

Of 2,793 women included in this study, 2111 had a BMI < 30 kg/m² and 682 had a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m². Obese women were less likely to experience spontaneous onset of labour (33.4% vs. 48.1%, p < 0.001) and more likely to be induced (37.2% vs. 31.0%, p = 0.002). Obesity was associated with a statistically significant increase in stillbirth, fetal macrosomia and emergency caesarean birth rates, whereas operative vaginal deliveries were significantly decreased. Miscarriage, shoulder dystocia, post-partum haemorrhage and spontaneous vaginal deliveries were reduced while elective caesarean birth and low birth weight incidence were increased in obese mothers; however, these results were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the magnitude of obstetric risks that are associated with maternal obesity within Irish population. Implementation of effective intervention strategies to reduce the number of obese women in pregnancy may have beneficial effects on pregnancy outcomes in Ireland.

Neonatal outcome by planned mode of delivery in women with a body mass index of 35 or more: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare neonatal outcomes of women with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥35 kg/m² who underwent a trial of labour with those of women who underwent a planned primary caesarean section (CS).

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of births between April 2012 and March 2014.

SETTING

A provincial database: Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Canada.

POPULATION

A cohort of 8752 women with a BMI of ≥35 kg/m² who had a singleton birth at 38-42 weeks of gestation.

METHODS

Neonatal outcomes were compared between women who underwent a trial of labour (with either a successful vaginal birth or intrapartum CS) and those who underwent a planned CS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

A composite of any of the following outcomes: intrapartum neonatal death, neonatal intensive care unit admission, 5-minute Apgar score of <7 or umbilical artery pH of <7.1.

RESULTS

During the study period, 8433 (96.4%) women had a trial of labour and 319 (3.6%) had a planned CS. Intrapartum CS was performed in 1644 (19.5%) cases. There was no association between planned mode of delivery and the primary outcome (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.59-1.07). The primary outcome was lower among women who had a successful trial of labour (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.91) and was higher among women who had a failed trial of labour (aOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.21-2.48), compared with women who underwent a planned CS.

CONCLUSIONS

In women with a BMI of ≥35 kg/m² at a gestational age of 38-42 weeks, neonatal outcomes are comparable between planned vaginal delivery and planned CS, although a failed trial of labour is at risk of adverse neonatal outcome.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Neonatal outcomes are not affected by planned mode of delivery in women who are obese, with a BMI of ≥35 kg/m² .

Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management among Obese Women at ≥39 Weeks

OBJECTIVE

Maternal obesity is associated with many adverse obstetric outcomes including cesarean delivery. It is unclear whether induction of labor can reduce these risks. Previous studies report conflicting results on the outcomes of elective induction of labor among obese women. This study aimed to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes between obese women undergoing elective induction of labor and those undergoing expectant management at ≥39 weeks.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study from the Consortium on Safe Labor of obese women (defined by prepregnancy body mass index≥ 30kg/m²) with singleton gestations at ≥39 weeks without medical comorbidities from 2002 through 2008. Women scheduled for medically indicated induction of labor were excluded. The primary outcome of cesarean delivery was compared between obese women undergoing elective induction of labor and expectant management during 39th, 40th, and 41st weeks using univariable and multivariable analyses, stratifying by parity.

RESULTS

In all, 7,298 nulliparous and 9,789 parous women were eligible for analysis. After controlling for potential confounders, elective induction of labor during 39th week in nulliparous and parous women was associated with lower odds of cesarean delivery (39.1 vs. 41.6%, adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-0.74 for nulliparous and 5.5 vs. 10.1%, adjusted OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.20-0.61 for parous women) compared with expectant management. Elective induction of labor during 40th and 41st weeks was not associated with lower odds of cesarean delivery. In addition, macrosomia was reduced in nulliparous women undergoing elective induction of labor during the 40th week (12.1 vs. 18.5%, adjusted OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.35-0.87) and in parous women undergoing elective induction of labor during 39th (11.6 vs. 17.6%, adjusted OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.38-0.66) and 40th weeks (16.4 vs. 22.2%, adjusted OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.36-0.78).

CONCLUSION

Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks, when compared with expectant management, was associated with lower cesarean deliveries in obese nulliparous and parous women.

The effect of maternal body mass index on duration of induced labor

INTRODUCTION

Obese primiparous women with induction of labor are at high risk for a cesarean section. There are contradictory results regarding time in induced labor in relation to maternal body mass index (BMI). It is important to characterize the course of induced labor to prevent unnecessary cesarean section. We aimed to evaluate whether the duration of labor was associated with maternal BMI in primiparous women with induction of labor.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A national retrospective cohort study, including 15 259 primiparae with a single term pregnancy, admitted for induction of labor from January 2014 to August 2017. Data were obtained from the Swedish Pregnancy Registry. Cox regression analyses were used to illustrate the association between BMI and active labor and between BMI and time from admission until start of active labor.

RESULTS

Duration of active labor was shorter in underweight women and prolonged in women with BMI ≥40 kg/m² compared with women in other BMI classes, illustrated by Cox regression graphs (P < .001). The median durations of active labor in underweight women were 6.1 and 7.4 hours in women with BMI ≥40 kg/m² . The time from admission until start of active labor increased with maternal BMI, illustrated by Cox regression graphs (P < .001) and the median duration increased from 12.9 hours in underweight women to 22.6 hours in women with BMI ≥40 kg/m² . The cesarean section rate in active labor increased significantly with BMI (P < .001) from 7.4% in underweight women to 22.0% in women with BMI ≥40 kg/m² . Obese and normal weight women had similar rates of spontaneous vaginal delivery (69.9% in the total study population).

CONCLUSIONS

The duration of active labor was associated with maternal BMI for underweight women and women with BMI ≥40 kg/m² . Although women with BMI ≥40 kg/m² who reached the active phase of labor had the same chance for a spontaneous vaginal delivery as normal weight women, the duration of active labor and the cesarean section rate were increased. The time from admission until start of active labor increased successively with maternal BMI.

The Edmonton Obesity Staging System Predicts Mode of Delivery After Labour Induction

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to evaluate the use of the Edmonton Obesity Staging System (EOSS) in predicting cesarean delivery among term, nulliparous, singleton pregnancies in women with overweight or obesity who are undergoing an induction of labour.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was performed in Edmonton, Alberta. Women undergoing an induction of labour at term were recruited to either a sample cohort, including women with a body mass index of ≥25 kg/m² at first antenatal visit, or a control cohort with a body mass index of 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m². Participating women provided a self-reported health history and consented to review of their medical records allowing allocation into EOSS categories. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean delivery based on EOSS category. Secondary outcomes consisted of a summary score of adverse maternal, delivery, and neonatal events (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2).

RESULTS

Overall, 345 women were recruited, with a participation rate of 93.7%. The sample cohort consisted of 276 women with overweight or obesity, whereas the control cohort included 69 normal-weight women. The overall rate of cesarean delivery was 30.4% for the control cohort and 35.8%, 29.9%, 43.2%, and 90.5% for women assigned an EOSS category 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P < 0.001). A summary score was not indicative of overall rate of adverse maternal, delivery, and neonatal events (P = 0.22).

CONCLUSION

The EOSS may help predict the chance of cesarean delivery in a high-risk group of nulliparous women with overweight or obesity who are undergoing an induction of labour at term.

Risk factors for failed induction of labor among pregnant women with Class III obesity

INTRODUCTION

Our aim was to identify risk factors for failed induction in morbidly obese patients undergoing the induction of labor at term.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective multicenter study on a cohort of 235 patients with a body mass index greater than 40 kg/m² and giving birth to a singleton in cephalic presentation, who had an induction of labor from 38 weeks of amenorrhea. Scheduled cesareans and spontaneous vaginal deliveries were excluded. Maternal, peri-partum and neonatal characteristics were analyzed according to the delivery route.

RESULTS

In all, 235 patients were included. Of these, 62.5% patients delivered vaginally and 37.5% by cesarean section. The frequency of nulliparity was greater in patients who had a cesarean section (56 [interquartile range, IQR, 38.1] vs 56 [IQR 63.6], P < .001). In multivariate analysis, nulliparity (odds ratio [OR] 2.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-4.97], P < .001), low Bishop's score (OR .794, 95% CI .70-.90, P < .001) and weight gain (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08, P = .033) were independent risk factors for failed induction. Umbilical cord pH at birth lower than 7 (0 vs 7 [IQR 8.0], P < .001) and lower than 7.20 (36 [IQR 24.5] vs 35 [IQR 39.8], P = .014) as well as the Apgar at 1 minute (14 [IQR 9.5] vs 17 [IQR 19.3], P = .032) was significantly higher in infants born by cesarean section.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, 63% of women with Class III obesity had successful inductions of labor; risk factors for failed induction include nulliparity and unfavorable Bishop score.

Is vaginal misoprostol more effective than oral misoprostol for cervical ripening in obese women?

Objective: To determine if vaginal misoprostol is more effective than oral misoprostol for cervical ripening in obese women.Study design: A retrospective cohort study of obese women undergoing induction of labor from Jan 2013 to Dec 2016 with singleton, viable pregnancies beyond 37 completed weeks of gestational age. Women with an initial Bishop score of 7 or less, with a cervical dilatation of less than 2 cm, who received either vaginal or oral misoprostol as a cervical ripening agent, were included. Primary outcome was interval from the start of induction to the attainment of 3 cm cervical dilatation. Secondary outcomes included the interval from the start of induction to delivery and the rate of cesarean delivery (CD).Result: Of women who met the inclusion criteria, 966 (75.5%) women received oral misoprostol and 314 (24.5%) received vaginal misoprostol. The mean time-interval from the start of induction to attainment of 3-cm dilatation was shorter in the vaginal group (10.5 ± 10.4 h) compared to the oral group (17.2 ± 11.5 h), (p < .0001). Significantly shorter times to delivery were also noted in the vaginal group (17.4 h for vaginal vs. 24.8 h for oral, p < .0001). In the subgroup analysis of nulliparous women, shorter time intervals from the start of induction to attainment of 3-cm dilatation, as well as to delivery, were noted in the vaginal misoprostol group (p < .0001 for both). Multiple linear regression model confirmed route of misoprostol administration as an independent variable in predicting the outcomes (time from start of induction to 3 cm as well as to delivery). Significant findings amongst neonatal outcomes included lower umbilical artery pH and higher rates of neonatal jaundice in the oral misoprostol group.Conclusion: In a population of obese women undergoing induction of labor, vaginal administration of misoprostol was associated shorter time intervals from the start of induction to the attainment of 3 cm of dilatation, as well as to delivery, without increasing the rate of cesarean deliveries or the incidence of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Influence of Maternal Obesity on Labor Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Studies have shown that women with obesity have longer labors. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to examine existing evidence regarding labor induction in women with obesity, including processes and outcomes. The primary outcome was cesarean birth following labor induction. Secondary outcomes were the timing and dosage of prostaglandins, the success of mechanical cervical ripening methods, and synthetic oxytocin dose and timing.

METHODS

Searches were performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, EBSCO, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Database of Abstracts of Effects, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Searches were limited to studies published in English after 1990. Ten studies published between 2009 and 2017 were included in this review. All were observational studies comparing processes and outcomes of induction of labor in relation to maternal body mass index. The primary outcome was cesarean birth following labor induction. We assessed heterogeneity using Cochran's Q test and tau-squared and I² statistics. We also calculated fixed-effect models to estimate pooled relative risks and weighted mean differences.

RESULTS

Ten cohort studies met inclusion criteria; 8 studies had data available for a meta-analysis of the primary outcome. Cesarean birth was more common among women with obesity compared with women of normal weight following labor induction (Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect odds ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.55-2.12; P < .001). Maternal obesity was associated with a longer time to birth, higher doses of prostaglandins, less frequent success of cervical ripening methods, and higher dose of synthetic oxytocin, as well as a longer time to birth after oxytocin use.

DISCUSSION

Women with obesity are more likely than women with a normal weight to end labor induction with cesarean birth. Additionally, women with obesity require longer labor inductions involving larger, more frequent applications of both cervical ripening methods and synthetic oxytocin.

Influence of maternal obesity on Bishop Score and failed induction of labour: A retrospective cohort study in a regional tertiary centre

BACKGROUND

Maternal obesity is a growing health concern that has previously been associated with increased need for induction of labour (IOL) and caesarean section (CS) rates. Currently, limited evidence explores the influence of maternal body mass index (BMI) on Bishop Score (BS) and outcome of IOL. This study hypothesises that maternal obesity will lead to a lower BS at presentation, higher rates of failed IOL, and increased CS rates.

AIMS

To explore the influence of maternal obesity on BS and likelihood of failed IOL.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of all live, term, singleton, cephalic deliveries initiated with IOL across normal BMI (18.00-24.99), overweight BMI (25.00-29.99), and obese BMI (>30.00) at the Townsville Hospital and Health Service (THHS) between July 2011 to June 2016. Student's t-test, χ² test, and binary logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. BS and failed IOL, defined as CS with cervical dilatation <3 cm, were the primary outcome measures. Delivery mode was the secondary outcome measure.

RESULTS

A total of 1543 women were included, 678 with normal BMI, 370 with overweight BMI, and 495 with obese BMI. Obese women are more likely to have a low BS (<5) at presentation (unadjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.5 (1.1-2.0), P < 0.05), an increased rate of failed IOL (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.6 (1.0-2.5), P < 0.05) and increased CS rate (aOR 1.1 (1.0-1.9), P < 0.05), compared to normal weight women.

CONCLUSIONS

Maternal obesity is associated with a lower BS, more difficult IOL process, and increased risk of failed IOL and CS.

Effect of maternal obesity on labor induction in postdate pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that there is a higher rate of unsuccessful induction of labor (IOL) in post-term obese pregnant women compared to non-obese ones.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, 144 obese (BMI > 30) and 144 non-obese (BMI < 29.9) post-term (> 41 weeks) pregnant women were recruited. IOL was done by misoprostol or amniotomy and oxytocin infusion according to the Bishop score. Comparison of percentage of failed IOL in both groups (primary outcome) was performed by the Chi-test. Logistic regression and multivariable regression were performed to assess the odds ratio (OR) of cesarean section (CS) and coefficient of delay in labor till vaginal delivery (VD) in obese versus (vs) non-obese groups. Adjustment for gestational age, parity, Bishop Score, membrane rupture and amniotic fluid index was done in both regression analyses.

RESULTS

CS rate was significantly higher in obese group [26.4 vs 15.9%; difference in proportion (95% CI) 0.1 (0.01, 0.19); P value 0.02]. 106 (73.6%) obese women and 121 (84.1%) non-obese women delivered vaginally. In addition, the duration till VD was significantly higher in obese group (22 vs 19 h, P value 0.01). After adjustment for possible confounding factors, the CS was still higher in the obese group in comparison to non-obese group (OR 2.02; 95% CI 1.1, 3.7; P value 0.02). This finding suggested that obesity was an independent factor for failure of IOL. In addition, after adjustment for these confounders, obesity had the risk of increasing labor duration by 2.3 h (95% CI 0.1, 4.5) in cases that ended in VD.

CONCLUSION

Based on our results, we conclude that there is a higher risk of CS in obese postdate pregnant women undergoing IOL in comparison to non-obese counterparts. Therefore, obstetricians should pay more attention to advising pregnant women about optimal weight gain during pregnancy and counseling about the chances of VD in cases of IOL. CLINCALTRIAL.

GOV ID

NCT02788305.

Variation in induction of labour rates across Irish hospitals; a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

In developed countries, rates of induction of labour (IOL) have increased and vary between hospitals. We aimed to identify whether national variations could be explained by sociodemographic, clinical and organisational differences.

METHODS

Two national databases in Ireland that routinely collect clinical and administrative data, the National Perinatal Reporting System and the Hospital Inpatient Enquiry Scheme, were used to analyse data for all women with singleton births weighing ≥500 g in 2009. We used logistic multilevel models to examine variation between hospitals, and to determine how much variation was due to individual level sociodemographic, clinical and organisational variables. Analyses were stratified for nulliparas, multiparas without prior caesarean section (CS) and multiparas with prior CS.

RESULTS

Of 69 304 eligible births, the rate of IOL nationally was 25.0% (range 14.5-33.2%).In nulliparas, the mean rate was 30.9% (range 18.6-45.7%). The rate was 24.8% (13.5-33.3%) and 3.8% (0.0-10.2%) for multiparas without and with prior CS, respectively. In nulliparas and multiparas without prior CS IOL was predicted by maternal birth in Ireland, increasing birthweight, antepartum complications, giving birth on a weekday and the model of obstetric care. Even after adjusting for known sociodemographic and clinical variables, variation between hospitals remained.

CONCLUSION

We found that clinical, sociodemographic and organisational factors all contributed to variation. However, unexplained variation persisted possibly due to organisational factors such as hospital-specific policies on IOL. The results indicate that the prevalence of antenatal complications, changing immigration patterns and policies on IOL after previous CS are factors likely to influence future IOL rates.

Induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix: how does BMI affect success? (‡)

OBJECTIVE

Obesity places women and their babies at risk for obstetric and perinatal morbidity including induction of labor and cesarean delivery. We sought to evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on successful induction of labor using misoprostol at our institution. The primary outcome was time to delivery. Secondary outcomes were number of doses of misoprostol, duration of oxytocin and cesarean delivery.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort over two years found 329 patients who were  > 37 weeks of gestational age and had a Bishop score  < 5 prior to beginning induction. Patients were divided into three categories based on their BMI: Group 1: BMI ≤ 30 kg/m(2), Group 2: BMI 30 to 39.9 kg/m(2) and Group 3: BMI ≥ 40 kg/m(2). Statistical analysis included the use of multivariate analysis, contingency tables and Chi-square tests for categorical data and Pearson's correlation coefficient for numerical data.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences among the groups when analyzed for gestational age, bishop score, median parity or race. Time to delivery increased significantly with increasing BMI (p < 0.01). Furthermore, women with higher BMIs required more doses of misoprostol (p < 0.01), longer duration of oxytocin administration prior to delivery (p < 0.02) and increased risk of cesarean section (p < 0.0006).

CONCLUSION

As BMI increases, obese patients undergoing induction with misoprostol have a longer time to delivery, require more doses of misoprostol, require a longer duration of oxytocin and have higher cesarean delivery rate.

Management of Foley catheter induction among nulliparous women: a retrospective study

Background

Induction of labour is associated with increased risk for caesarean delivery among nulliparous women. The aims of this study were to evaluate the risk factors for caesarean delivery and to investigate the risk of maternal and neonatal infections in nulliparous women undergoing induction of labour by Foley catheter.

Methods

This clinical retrospective study of 432 nulliparous women with singleton pregnancy and intact amniotic membranes at or beyond 37 gestational weeks scheduled for induction of labour by Foley catheter was conducted over the course of one year, between January 2012 and January 2013, in Helsinki University Hospital. The main outcome measures were caesarean section rate and maternal and neonatal infections. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to estimate relative risks by odds ratios with 95 % confidence intervals.

Results

The caesarean section rate was 39.1 % (n = 169). In multivariate regression analysis, the factors associated with caesarean section were the need for oxytocin for labour induction [OR 2.9 (95 % CI 1.8-4.5) p < 0.001] and early epidural analgesia [OR 9.9 (95 % CI 2.1-47.5), p = 0.004]. The maternal intrapartum infection rate was 6.3 %, and the clinical neonatal infection rate was 2.8 %. In multivariate analysis, gestational diabetes was associated with maternal intrapartum infection [OR 4.3 (95 % CI 1.7-11.0, p = 0.002] and early epidural analgesia with neonatal clinical sepsis [OR 10.5 (95 % CI 1.4-76), p = 0.02].

Conclusions

Oxytocin induction and early epidural analgesia were associated with caesarean delivery. Gestational diabetes and early epidural analgesia were associated with infectious morbidity. Since the first caesarean delivery has a major impact on subsequent pregnancies, optimising labour induction among nulliparous women is important.

Influence of obesity on route of delivery in a population of African descent in Martinique

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether obesity is an independent risk factor for cesarean delivery in Martinique.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed using data for deliveries that occurred at the University Hospital of Fort de France between January and September 2010. Women were divided into four groups on the basis of body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters; < 25 [group 1], 25-29 [group 2], 30-39 [group 3], and ≥ 40 [group 4]). Independent risk factors for cesarean delivery were identified through multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 1286 women were included. Mean weight gain was lower in groups 2 (9.9 kg, 95% CI 9.2-10.7), 3 (5.7 kg, 4.7-6.7), and 4 (1.0 kg,-1.5 to 3.5), than in group 1 (12.3 kg, 11.9-12.7; P < 0.001 for all). In univariate analysis, cesarean deliveries were more frequent among nulliparous women in group 2 (P = 0.007) and group 3 (P = 0.053) than among those in group 1. In multivariate analysis, BMI was not associated with cesarean delivery (BMI 25-29: adjusted odds ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.33-1.25; BMI ≥ 30: 0.61, 0.29-1.39).

CONCLUSION

Obesity was not an independent risk factor for cesarean delivery. Weight control and a positive attitude towards trial of labor in obese women could have led to the findings.

Mode of delivery in women with class III obesity: planned cesarean compared with induction of labor

OBJECTIVE

To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes between planned cesarean delivery and induction of labor in women with class III obesity (body mass index ≥40 kg/m(2)).

STUDY DESIGN

In this retrospective cohort study, we identified all women with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m(2) who delivered a singleton at our institution from January 2007 to February 2013 via planned cesarean or induction of labor (regardless of eventual delivery route) at 37-41 weeks. Patients in spontaneous labor were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal morbidity including death as well as operative, infection, and thromboembolic complications. The secondary outcome was a neonatal morbidity composite. Additional outcomes included individual components of the composites. Student t, χ(2), and Fisher exact tests were used for statistical analysis. To calculate adjusted odds ratios, covariates were analyzed via multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

There are 661 mother-infant pairs that met enrollment criteria-399 inductions and 262 cesareans. Groups were similar in terms of prepregnancy weight, pregnancy weight gain, and delivery body mass index. Of the 399 inductions, 258 had cervical ripening (64.7%) and 163 (40.9%) had a cesarean delivery. After multivariable adjustments, there was no significant difference in the maternal morbidity composite (adjusted odds ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.77) or in the neonatal morbidity composite (adjusted odds ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-1.77) between the induction and cesarean groups.

CONCLUSION

In term pregnant women with class III obesity, planned cesarean does not appear to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity compared with induction of labor.