High intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of adenomyosis: selection criteria, efficacy, safety and fertility

Analysis of factors affecting pregnancy outcomes in patients with adenomyosis after high intensity focused ultrasound ablation: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate all pregnancies and analyze the factors influencing pregnancy outcomes in patients with adenomyosis after high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 231 patients with adenomyosis who completed HIFU and wished to conceive were enrolled. The symptom improvement and information of pregnancy were recorded during the follow-up period. Factors influencing pregnancy outcomes were analyzed using multivariate regression analysis and survival analysis.

RESULTS

After HIFU, 100 of 231 (43.3%) patients became pregnant within 96 months, including 77 (77/194, 39.7%) in natural and 23 (23/37, 62.2%) in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) pregnancies following gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa). Among the 108 (46.8%, 108/231) infertile patients (defined as the failure to achieve pregnancy after 12 months of regular unprotected sexual intercourse, 40 primary infertility and 68 secondary infertility), 31 (28.7%) became pregnant. At the end of the follow-up, 70 successfully delivered 71 healthy babies. No uterine rupture occurred during pregnancy and delivery. Patients with pelvic adhesion and infertility history had a lower pregnancy chance than that of patients without pelvic adhesion and infertility history (OR < 1, p < 0.05). Patients with small adenomyotic lesion volume had a greater pregnancy chance than that of patients with large lesion volume (OR < 1, p < 0.05). IVF-ET following GnRHa had a better pregnancy chance (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

HIFU seems to have a beneficial effect on fertility of patients with adenomyosis. Pelvic adhesion, infertility history, and large adenomyotic lesion volume have adverse effects on pregnancy, but IVF-ET following GnRHa after HIFU could increase the pregnancy chance.

Adenomyosis and fertility-sparing surgery: A literature appraisal

Adenomyosis is an intricate pathological condition that negatively impacts the uterus. It is closely related to the more well-known endometriosis, with which it shares parallels in terms of diagnosis, therapy, and both microscopic and macroscopic features. The purpose of this narrative review is to give a clear univocal definition and outlook on the different, patient-adapted, surgical treatments. MEDLINE and PubMed searches on these topics were conducted from 1990 to 2022 using a mix of selected keywords. Papers and articles were identified and included in this narrative review after authors' revision and evaluation. From the literature analysis, authors reported the following surgical techniques: laparoscopic double/triple-flap method, laparotomic wedge resection of the uterine wall, laparotomic transverse H-incision of the uterine wall, laparotomic wedge-shaped excision, and laparotomic complete debulking excision by asymmetric dissection technique. Each of these techniques has strengths and weaknesses, but the literature data on the pregnancy rate are somewhat limited. The only certain information is the risk of uterine rupture up to 6.0% after surgical treatment for uterine adenomyosis. Over the years, the surgical approach continued to reach a positive result by minimally invasive treatment, with less hospitalization, less postoperative pain, and less blood loss. Over the years, the gynecological surgeon has gained the skills, training and increasingly sophisticated surgical techniques to target effective therapy. That's why a hysterectomy is no longer the only surgical resource to treat adenomyosis, but in patients who wish to preserve the fertility, there is a wide variety of surgical alternatives.

Alternative treatments of adenomyosis - an update in procedural management and clinical outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Adenomyosis is a common cause of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), dysmenorrhea, and pelvic pain. Definitive diagnosis and treatment have historically been by uterine histopathology at time of hysterectomy; however, advances in imaging have supported earlier diagnosis and subsequent conservative treatment. This review aims to update the evidence supporting the uterine-sparing, procedural management options with a focus on clinical outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Uterine artery embolization (UAE), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), percutaneous microwave ablation (PMWA), and adenomyomectomy are minimally invasive interventions proven to be effective in reducing AUB and dysmenorrhea due to adenomyosis. Symptom improvement is associated with a decrease in uterine volume. Studies support the use of alternative treatment options given the overall low rates of symptom recurrence and reintervention. Combination therapy may be more effective than monotherapy.

SUMMARY

This review provides the current evidence for use of alternative treatment options for adenomyosis. Access to ablative therapies in the USA is limited and primarily off label, given lack of FDA approval. High-quality prospective and randomized controlled trials are needed in order to further delineate treatment comparisons, efficacy, safety, and ideal patient selection for these treatments. More data are needed to assess safety and utility in those desiring future fertility.

Effectiveness of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or combined with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for adenomyosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRH-a) and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) are conventional conservative treatments for adenomyosis, and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a novel ablation technique. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of HIFU combined with GnRH-a or LNG-IUS for adenomyosis patients. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases were searched up to December 2021. Published studies comparing HIFU plus GnRH-a with HIFU plus LNG-IUS in adenomyosis patients were assessed for eligibility by two independent authors. Risk of bias tool was utilized for risk evaluation. We selected treatment effective rate of dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) as the primary outcome; effective rate of menorrhagia severity and reduction rate of adenomyotic lesion as the secondary outcomes. Adverse effects were assessed. Four studies with a total 729 patients were enrolled in the meta-analysis. HIFU plus LNG-IUS showed lower dysmenorrhea [within 6 months: risk ratio (RR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-0.93, p < 0.00001; over 1 year: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.65-0.82, p < 0.00001] and less menorrhagia severity (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.60-0.66, p < 0.00001) than HIFU plus GnRH-a. Both groups demonstrated equal efficacy in adenomyotic lesion reduction rate (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.97-1.09, p = 0.30). Adverse effects happened equally in both groups. Combination therapy of HIFU and LNG-IUS revealed better effectiveness in treating dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia than that of HIFU and GnRH-a. However, interpreting the conclusion should be approached with caution as a result of significant heterogeneity.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Classification Systems for Informing Better Outcomes of Adenomyosis After Ultrasound-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablating Surgery

BACKGROUND

A referenced MRI-based classification associated with focused ultrasound ablation surgery (FUAS) outcomes is lacking in adenomyosis.

PURPOSE

To identify an MRI-based classification system for informing the FUAS outcomes.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

Patients with FUAS for adenomyosis, were divided into a training set (N = 643; 355 with post-FUAS gonadotropin-releasing hormone/levonorgestrel, 288 without post-FUAS therapy) and an external validation set (N = 135; all without post-FUAS therapy).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

1.5 T, turbo spin-echo T2-weighted imaging and single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging sequences.

ASSESSMENT

Five MRI-based adenomyosis classifications: classification 1 (C1) (diffuse, focal, and mild), C2 (intrinsic, extrinsic, intramural, and indeterminate), C3 (internal, adenomyomas, and external), C4 (six subtypes on areas [internal or external] and volumes [<1/3 or ≥2/3]), and C5 (internal [asymmetric or symmetric], external, intramural, full thickness [asymmetric or symmetric]) for FUAS outcomes (symptom relief and recurrence).

STATISTICAL TESTS

The optimal classification was significantly associated with the most subtypes of FUAS outcomes. Relating to the timing of recurrence was measured using Cox regression analysis and median recurrence time was estimated by a Kaplan-Meier curve. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Dysmenorrhea relief and recurrence were only associated with C2 in training patients undergoing FUAS alone. Compared with other subtypes, the extrinsic subtype of C2 was significantly associated with dysmenorrhea recurrence in the FUAS group. Besides, the median dysmenorrhea recurrence time of extrinsic subtype was significantly shorter than that of other subtypes (42.0 months vs. 50.3 months). In the validation cohort, C2 was confirmed as the optimal system and its extrinsic subtype was confirmed to have a significantly shorter dysmenorrhea recurrence time than other subtypes.

DATA CONCLUSION

Classification 2 can inform dysmenorrhea relief and recurrence in patients with adenomyosis undergoing FAUS only. Itsextrinsic subtype was associated with an earlier onset of dysmenorrhea recurrence after treatment.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.

High-intensity Focused Ultrasound is a Better Choice for Women with Fertility Desire: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Comparison between High-intensity Focused Ultrasound and Laparoscopic Treatment of Uterine Fibroids

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is commonly used to treat uterine fibroids and adenomyosis, but there is no evidence using metadata to compare fertility outcomes between conventional laparoscopic procedures and HIFU. The purpose of this study analysis is that evidence-based fertility outcomes may provide better treatment options for clinicians and patients considering fertility. The literature on fertility data for HIFU surgery versus laparoscopic myomectomy was searched in seven English language databases from January 1, 2010, to November 23, 2022. A total of 1375 articles were received in the literature, 14 of which were selected. We found that women who underwent HIFU surgery had higher rates of spontaneous pregnancy, higher rates of spontaneous delivery, and higher rates of full-term delivery but may have higher rates of miscarriage or postpartum complications than women who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy. Looking forward to future studies, it is hoped that the literature will examine endometrial differences in women who undergo HIFU and laparoscopic myomectomy to demonstrate the ability of endometrial repair. The location of fibroids in the sample should also be counted to allow for attribution statistics on the cause of miscarriage.

High-intensity focused ultrasound for endometrial ablation in adenomyosis: a clinical study

Objective

The present study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of endometrial ablation with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for symptom relief in women with adenomyosis.

Methods

Between July 2014 and July 2020, 167 patients with adenomyosis treated at the Zhongshan City People's Hospital were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into two groups according to patient aspirations: the control group, including patients who only underwent ablation of adenomyosis lesions (group A) and the treatment group, including patients who underwent removal of adenomyosis lesions and endometrial ablation (group B).

Results

The reduced dysmenorrhea scores (visual analog scale) and menstrual volume scores (pictorial blood assessment chart) were measured before and after treatment. The scores were obtained by subtracting the postoperative scores from the preoperative scores and were compared to determine whether the symptoms had alleviated. Compared with the menstrual volume of group A, that in group B showed significant improvements. The average relief rates of dysmenorrhea in the two groups also showed significant improvement. However, the scores in group B showed a more significant improvement than those in group A.

Conclusion

Therefore, our findings suggest that endometrial ablation using HIFU may be superior to conventional therapy with regard to alleviating the symptoms of increased menstruation in women with adenomyosis.

Changes of serum CA125 and PGE2 before and after high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with GnRH-a in treatment of patients with adenomyosis

This study aimed to investigate the changes of serum carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in patients with adenomyosis before and after treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a). One hundred and sixty-five patients with adenomyosis who received HIFU combined with GnRH-a were selected as case group. Sixty-five healthy women who underwent physical examination at the same time were taken as normal control group. At the end of follow-up 6 months after treatment, the case group were divided into effective subgroup and ineffective subgroup according to clinical efficacy. Changes of serum CA125 and PGE2 were analyzed. Serum CA125 and PGE2 levels in the case group were higher than those in the normal control group before treatment (both P < 0.001). Serum CA125 and PGE2 levels in the case group 6 months after treatment were lower than those before treatment (both P < 0.001). There was no difference in serum CA125 and PGE2 levels between effective subgroup and ineffective subgroup before treatment (P = 0.351, 0.284, respectively). Serum CA125 and PGE2 levels in the effective subgroup were lower than those in the ineffective subgroup 6 months after treatment (both P < 0.001). Serum CA125 and PGE2 may be involved in the development of adenomyosis, and their expression levels may be related to the prognosis of patients. Levels of serum CA125 and PGE2 in patients with adenomyosis decrease after treatment with HIFU combined with GnRH-a. The detection of serum CA125 and PGE2 may be used as an index to diagnose adenomyosis and evaluate the therapeutic effect of HIFU combined with GnRH-a.

In vivo evaluation of focused ultrasound ablation surgery (FUAS)-induced coagulation using echo amplitudes of the therapeutic focused ultrasound transducer

OBJECTIVE

Monitoring sensitivity of sonography in focused ultrasound ablation surgery (FUAS) is limited (no hyperechoes in ∼50% of successful coagulation in uterine fibroids). A more accurate and sensitive approach is required.

METHOD

The echo amplitudes of the focused ultrasound (FUS) transducer in a testing mode (short pulse duration and low power) were found to correlate with the ex vivo coagulation. To further evaluate its coagulation prediction capabilities, in vivo experiments were carried out. The liver, kidney, and leg muscles of three adult goats were treated using clinical FUAS settings, and the echo amplitude of the FUS transducer and grayscale in sonography before and after FUAS were collected. On day 7, animals were sacrificed humanely, and the treated tissues were dissected to expose the lesion. Echo amplitude changes and lesion areas were analyzed statistically, as were the coagulation prediction metrics.

RESULTS

The echo amplitude changes of the FUS transducer correlate well with the lesion areas in the liver (R = 0.682). Its prediction in accuracy (94.4% vs. 50%), sensitivity (92.9% vs. 35.7%), and negative prediction (80% vs. 30.8%) is better than sonography, but similar in specificity (80% vs. 100%) and positive prediction (100% vs. 100%). In addition, the correlation between tissue depth and the lesion area is not good (|R| < 0.2). Prediction performances in kidney and leg muscles are similar.

CONCLUSION

The FUS echo amplitudes are sensitive to the tissue properties and their changes after FUAS. They are sensitive and reliable in evaluating and predicting FUAS outcomes.

Percutaneous cryoablation of symptomatic uterine adenomyomas: Initial experience

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of adenomyomas MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five symptomatic women who wanted to preserve their uterus and fertility underwent a single session of percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of adenomyoma. Three to six 17-gauge cryoprobes were introduced percutaneously into the adenomyoma under ultrasound and laparoscopy guidance. Clinical efficacy was defined as the diminution of the Visual Analogue Scale of pain (VAS), the decrease in uterine bleeding and the improvement of quality of life assessed by the endometriosis health profile 5 (EHP-5) 12 months after treatment. Technical efficacy was defined by the reduction in volume of each treated adenomyoma on MRI. Complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Hysterosonography was performed at least 3 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

Compared to the baseline, all symptom scores had decreased after 12 months: median VAS 8/10 (range, 5-10) to 4/10 (range, 0-7); median dyspareunia score 7/10 (range, 0-10) to 2/10 (range, 0-8); median bleeding score 335 (range, 102-920) to 76 (range, 0-88); median EHP-5 score 60/100 (range, 50-75) to 50/100 (range, 32-55). The median volume of adenomyosis decreased from 57 cm3 (range, 8-87) to 9 cm3 (range, 2-45) at 12 months. No postoperative complications occurred. Two patients had incomplete intrauterine adhesions that were easily removed hysteroscopically.

CONCLUSION

Cryoablation may be a promising alternative treatment for symptomatic adenomyoma in women who want to preserve their uterus.

Efficacy and influencing factor analysis of high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy for abdominal wall endometriosis: a case series

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the short-term and long-term efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy for abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) and explore its potential influencing factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 80 patients with AWE who underwent HIFU therapy were retrospectively analyzed. Follow-ups were also conducted to evaluate the changes in lesion size and pain relief. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to investigate factors influencing HIFU therapy for AWE.

RESULTS

Among the 80 patients with AWE who received HIFU therapy, the effective rates were 76.3%, 80.5%, and 90.5% after 3, 12 and 24 months of follow-up, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the AWE lesion diameter and sonication intensity had statistically significant effects on the 3-month and 12-month efficacy of HIFU therapy for AWE, while age, BMI, disease duration, average sonication power and grey-scale changes did not have statistically significant effects. Four patients with AWE experienced recurrence after HIFU therapy, for a three-year cumulative recurrence rate of 6.3%. Furthermore, ten patients required reintervention after treatment, for a five-year cumulative reintervention rate of 13.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study further confirmed the safety and effectiveness of HIFU therapy for AWE. Factors such as AWE lesion diameter and sonication intensity have been identified as key influencers affecting the short-term and long-term efficacy of HIFU therapy for AWE. The first two years following HIFU therapy constitute crucial periods for observation, and judiciously extending follow-up intervals during this timeframe is advised.

Pregnancy outcomes of adenomyotic patients with primary infertility after high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the therapeutic effect of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for adenomyotic patients with primary infertility and to explore the factors that affect the pregnancy outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven adenomyotic patients with primary infertility who underwent HIFU at HUNAN Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, China, between July 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated the pregnancy outcomes and analyzed the factors that may affect pregnancy outcomes including time to conception, pregnancy approach, gestational age, delivery mode, neonatal outcomes, and complications during pregnancy and delivery.

RESULTS

Among the 27 adenomyotic patients with primary infertility, 10 patients had a total of 11 pregnancies after HIFU treatment. Of these, eight (72%) cases were natural pregnancies and three (23%) were in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancies. The median time to conception was 10 (range 4-25) months. There were eight (72%) successful deliveries. The rate of full-term deliveries was 90%. Of the eight live births, four (50%) were born vaginally and four (50%) by cesarean section. No severe complications occurred. The mean birth weight of newborns was 3.1 (range: 2.3-3.9) kg; all newborns developed well without complications during postpartum and breastfeeding.

CONCLUSIONS

HIFU treatment for adenomyosis could improve fertility of patients with primary infertility. HIFU is a promising therapeutic approach for patients with adenomyosis and infertility who wish to achieve pregnancy and have live birth deliveries.

Risk of Recurrence and Reintervention After Uterine-Sparing Interventions for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of recurrence and reintervention after uterine-sparing treatment options for symptomatic adenomyosis, including adenomyomectomy, uterine artery embolization (UAE), and image-guided thermal ablation.

DATA SOURCES

We searched electronic databases such as Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar from January 2000 to January 2022. The search was conducted using the following search terms: "adenomyosis," "recurrence," "reintervention," "relapse," and "recur."

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

All studies that described the risk of recurrence or reintervention after uterine-sparing interventions for symptomatic adenomyosis were reviewed and screened according to the eligibility criteria. Recurrence was defined as the reappearance of symptoms (painful menses or heavy menstrual bleeding) after significant or complete remission, or the reappearance of adenomyotic lesions confirmed by ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The outcome measures were presented as the frequency with percentage and pooled with 95% CI. A total of 42 studies (single-arm retrospective and prospective studies) that represented 5,877 patients were included. The recurrence rates after adenomyomectomy, UAE, and image-guided thermal ablation were 12.6% (95% CI 8.9-16.4%), 29.5% (95% CI 17.4-41.5%), and 10.0% (95% CI 5.6-14.4%), respectively. The reintervention rates were 2.6% (95% CI 0.9-4.3%), 12.8% (95% CI 7.2-18.4%), and 8.2% (95% CI 4.6-11.9%) after adenomyomectomy, UAE, and image-guided thermal ablation, respectively. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed, and the heterogeneity was reduced in several analyses.

CONCLUSION

Uterine-sparing techniques were successful in treating adenomyosis with low reintervention rates. Uterine artery embolization had higher recurrence and reintervention rates than other techniques; however, patients treated with UAE had larger uteri and larger adenomyosis, indicating that selection bias may influence these results. More randomized controlled trials with a larger population are needed in the future.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42021261289.

Uterine rupture after high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of adenomyosis: a case report and literature review

AIM

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a non-invasive treatment of adenomyosis. Uterine rupture during pregnancy is a rare adverse event after HIFU treatment, because HIFU treatment results in tissue coagulative necrosis.

METHODS

We reported a case of uterine rupture in a 34-year-old woman. The woman had HIFU treatment for adenomyosis eight months before unplanned pregnancy. She was closely monitored during the pregnancy and the antenatal course was uneventful. At the gestational age of 38 weeks and 2 days, an emergency lower segment cesarean section was performed because of inexplainable abdominal pain. After delivery of the fetus, a 2 × 2 cm serous membrane rupture was observed in the HIFU treatment area.

CONCLUSION

Uterine rupture during pregnancy after HIFU is a rare adverse event, however, attention is required during the whole pregnancy in case of unexpected uterine rupture.

High intensity focused ultrasound treatment for adenomyosis: comparison of efficacy based on MRI features

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical efficacy of High intensity-focused ultrasound(HIFU) for different types of adenomyosis classified by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

A total of 227 patients with adenomyosis who underwent HIFU treatment in Suining Central Hospital from January 2014 to December 2019 were included. Based on the preoperative pelvic MRI examination and Kishi isometric classification method, the patients were divided into 4 types according to the location of lesions. There were 82 cases of type I (endogenous type), 75 cases of type II (exogenous type), 34 cases of type III (nodular type), and 36 cases of type IV (heterogeneous type). The results of HIFU treatment for four types of adenomyosis and intraoperative adverse effects were analyzed. The changes of lesion size, dysmenorrhea, and menstrual volume were analyzed at 3 and 6 months after the operation.

RESULT

(1) adverse effects: All patients successfully accepted HIFU treatment under sedation and analgesia. Grade A adverse effects occurred in 51 cases (22.47%) and grade B adverse effects in 3 cases (1.32%). The incidence of adverse effects in type I-IV patients was 21.95%, 22.66%, 23.53%, and 30.56%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade A and B adverse effects in all types, and no grade C-F adverse effects occurred. (2) Ablation effect: The ablation rate of type III(nodular type)patients was (74.7 ± 20.3) %, which was significantly higher than that of the other three types (p < .05). (3) Changes in lesion size: the lesion size of all patients decreased after treatment and the reduction rate gradually increased with time. At 6 months after the operation, the lesion reduction rate of type III patients was (70.8 ± 14.8) %, higher than that of the other three types patients (p < .05). There was no significant difference in the reduction rate of type I, type II and type IV. (4) Remission of menorrhagia: At 6 months after the operation, the total remission rate of type III patients was 100%, while the total remission rate of type IV patients (65.4%, 17/26) that was lower than that of type I, II and III patients(p < .05). (5) Dysmenorrhea relief: At 6 months after the operation, the total dysmenorrhea relief rate of type III patients was 100% and the complete relief rate (28.1%, 18/31) was higher than that of the other three types, which was significant differences (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

HIFU is safe and effective in the treatment of different types of adenomyosis, the therapeutic effect of HIFU in patients with type III adenomyosis is better than that of the other three types.

The Asian Society of Endometriosis and Adenomyosis guidelines for managing adenomyosis

This is the first guidelines for adenomyosis from the Asian Society of Endometriosis and Adenomyosis.

Comparison of high-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of internal and external adenomyosis based on magnetic resonance imaging classification

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for patients with internal or external adenomyosis based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) classification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 238 patients with internal adenomyosis and 167 patients with external adenomyosis who received HIFU treatment were enrolled. HIFU treatment results and adverse effects between patients with internal and external adenomyosis were compared.

RESULTS

The treatment time and sonication time for patients with external adenomyosis were significantly longer than that for patients with internal adenomyosis. The total energy used and EEF for patients with external adenomyosis were higher than that for patients with internal adenomyosis (p < 0.05). The pre-HIFU median dysmenorrhea score in patients with internal or external adenomyosis was 5 or 8 points, the median score decreased to 1 or 3 points in these two groups at 18-month post-HIFU (p < 0.05). The relief rate of dysmenorrhea was 79.5% in patients with internal adenomyosis, and it was 80.8% in patients with external adenomyosis. The pre-HIFU median menorrhagia score in patients with internal or external adenomyosis was 4 or 3 points, the median score decreased to 1 point in both groups at 18-month post-HIFU with a relief rate of 86.2% and 77.1%, respectively (p = 0.030). No serious complication occurred in any of these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

HIFU is a safe and effective treatment either for patients with internal adenomyosis or external adenomyosis. It seemed that internal adenomyosis is easier to be treated with HIFU and with a higher relief rate of menorrhagia than external adenomyosis.

Impact of Adenomyosis on Infertile Patients-Therapy Options and Reproductive Outcomes

Adenomyosis is associated with a negative impact on reproductive outcomes. Although adenomyosis is detected more frequently in women of late reproductive age, its impact on pregnancy rates is important because, in today's world, family planning has shifted towards the late reproductive phase of life for many women. Although the diagnostic indications for imaging studies are well-known, we lack strict diagnostic criteria and classification systems concerning the extent of the disease. Selecting the optimal evidence-based treatment option for adenomyosis is difficult because of the paucity of evidence concerning the association between fertility and the degree and composition of adenomyosis. Furthermore, the treatment of infertility might interfere with the treatment of adenomyosis due to the presence of pain. The aim of this review is to analyze the association between adenomyosis and infertility, and describe treatment options to enhance reproductive outcomes. The following aspects will be addressed in detail: (a) prevalence and causes of adenomyosis, (b) diagnostic tools with imaging techniques, (c) clinical symptoms, (d) proposed pathomechanism of adenomyosis and infertility, and (e) different treatment approaches (pharmacological, surgical, others) and their impact on reproductive outcomes.

Factors influencing treatment decisions in HIFU treatment of adenomyosis: A retrospective study

Objective

To explore the influencing factors of decision-making in patients with adenomyosis, who are receiving high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment.

Methods

A total of 776 patients with adenomyosis were enrolled into HIFU group (241 cases) and hysterectomy group (535 cases) according to the treatment methods. The general data, clinical symptoms, marital and childbearing history, and economic status were compared between the two groups, and factors with P < 0.05 were introduced into multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the determinants of patients choosing HIFU.

Results

The average age of the patients in the HIFU group was 39.1 ± 5.2 years, which was lower than that in the hysterectomy group, which was 45.1 ± 3.9 years (P < 0.05). The basic medical insurance for urban workers in the HIFU group was more than the hysterectomy group (P < 0.05). 95.9% of the hysterectomy group had no desire to have children, compared to 60.6% of the HIFU group, the difference was significant (P < 0.05). The treatment costs of HIFU group were significantly lower than that of hysterectomy group (P < 0.05). The main symptoms of the two groups were dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, and secondary anemia. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that 31–40 years old, fertility desire, dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, anemia and dizziness and fatigue were the influencing factors for the decision-making of HIFU for patients with adenomyosis.

Conclusion

31–40 years old, fertility desire, dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, anemia and dizziness and fatigue were the influencing factors for patients to choose HIFU treatment. HIFU therapy has emerged as a new option for patients with adenomyosis as an alternative to hysterectomy.

Doppler Imaging Assessment of Changes of Blood Flow in Adenomyosis After Higher-Dose Oxytocin: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES

To assess the changes of blood flow in adenomyosis (AM) after higher-dose oxytocin (OT) in different doses, and to evaluate the safety for patients.

METHODS

A total of 124 patients with AM were randomly divided into 4 groups with continuous intravenous infusion of OT as 0.06, 0.12, 0.24 and 0.36 U/min, respectively. The changes of arteries of AM before and after intravenous infusion of OT were observed by color Doppler ultrasound. The changes of blood flow volume of the artery of AM before and after intravenous infusion of OT were compared among the 4 groups, and the vital signs and adverse drug reactions were monitored during intravenous drip.

RESULTS

During the trial, no severe adverse reactions occurred and the vital signs of all the patients were stable. Among the 4 groups, it was found that there was a significant difference in the change of blood flow volume of blood artery in AM lesions between 0.06 U/min OT group and the other three groups after intravenous drip of OT (P < .05), but there was no significant difference in blood flow volume among the three groups (P > .05), and the difference of adverse drug reactions was statistically significant with the increase of OT dose (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

OT can effectively reduce the blood flow volume of AM lesions, and continuous intravenous infusion of 0.12 U/min OT is an appropriate dose that can not only minimize the blood flow volume but also reduce the incidence of adverse drug reactions.

How to boost an obstetrician's confidence in vaginal delivery after high-intensity focused ultrasound: a comparison study on delivery outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of vaginal delivery after HIFU.

METHODS

A total of 37 women who met the trial of labor after HIFU (TOLAH) inclusion criteria and 368 women who met the trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) inclusion criteria gave birth at Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital between 14^th June 2018 and 24^th September 2021. The delivery outcomes of the two groups were compared. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the adjusted risk of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH).

RESULTS

In the Qualified Candidates for TOLAH group, vaginal delivery is substantially less common (p = 0.000). The prevalence of PPH in the Qualified Candidates for TOLAH group is lower than in the Candidates for TOLAC group (8.82% vs 10.51%, p = 0.534; 0% vs 2.51%, p = 0.418). Hemoglobin drop in the Qualified Candidates for TOLAH group is also lower (7.03 ± 7.39vs 12.11 ± 12.62, p = 0.001). The rate of using more than two types of uterotonic medications to promote contraction is significantly lower in the Qualified Candidates for TOLAH group (54.05% vs 69.84%, p = 0.04), and the percentage of abnormal uterine contraction is lower in the Qualified Candidates for TOLAH group (35.14% vs 49.18%, p = 0.072). PPH is strongly predicted by abnormal uterine contraction (aOR: 17.177, 95% CI:5.046 ∼ 58.472, p = 0.000), but not by HIFU (aOR:1.105; 95% CI:0.240 ∼ 5.087, p = 0.898). No uterine rupture occurred in the cases after HIFU.

CONCLUSIONS

No uterine rupture occurred in our study group after HIFU. HIFU is not a risk for PPH. It is promising for those after HIFU to choose vaginal delivery.

Conservative surgical and drug therapies for adenomyosis Medicine

Adenomyosis is a benign invasion/infiltration of endometrial glands and stroma in the uterine myometrium. The optimal choice of adenomyosis treatment remains a subject of discussion. For patients with adenomyosis without fertility requirements, hysterectomy can be performed by laparotomy or laparoscopic surgery to eliminate symptoms. However, this is an inadequate option for women who want to preserve fertility or avoid more extensive surgery. To summarize the medicine and conservative surgery treatment for adenomyosis. An extensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) without language restriction. The search terms were as follows: adenomyomas, adenomyosis, conservative therapy; combined therapy; medicine; surgery. The search included all titles and abstracts assessing conservative treatment for adenomyosis including medical and surgical therapy. All published papers were analyzed if considered relevant. Increasing current conservative treatments will not only improve the quality of life of the patients but also preserve fertility. Therefore, conservative treatment is extremely important for patients with fertility requirements or a strong desire to retain the uterus. Conservative treatment for adenomyosis may become a future trend in the field of gynecology.

Low-intensity ultrasound promotes uterine involution after cesarean section: the first multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of low-intensity ultrasound (LIUS) in promoting uterine involution and relieving postpartum pain.

METHODS

The randomized controlled clinical trial in this study was conducted at five centers in three regions across China from June 2014 to December 2014. A total of 498 subjects were randomly divided into two groups. The LIUS group received ultrasound treatment, and the control group received sham ultrasound treatment. The fundal height and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of the subjects following cesarean section were recorded separately before and after five treatments. The incidence of adverse events was recorded, while the records on lochia duration were obtained by telephone follow-up. The Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised all subjects randomized who received at least one treatment. The Per-Protocol Set (PPS) comprised all patients who did not seriously violate the study protocol and had good compliance with complete report forms. Efficacy analyses were performed based on the FAS and PPS. All safety analyses were performed based on the safety set (SS), which included all patients who received at least one treatment.

RESULTS

In the analysis of PPS and FAS, the LIUS group performed better than the control group in reducing the fundal height, shortening the duration of lochia, and relieving postpartum pain, with a significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.0001). In the SS analysis, there were no treatment-related adverse events observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The LIUS therapy is safe and effective, which contributes to uterine involution and the alleviation of postpartum pain.

Microbubble contrast agent SonoVue combined with oxytocin improves the efficiency of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for adenomyosis

BACKGROUND

To investigate the combined enhancing effects of microbubble-contrast SonoVue and oxytocin on high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation of adenomyosis.

METHODS

330 patients with adenomyosis were randomly assigned to SonoVue and oxytocin group (group A, n = 82), oxytocin (group B, n = 85), SonoVue (group C, n = 81), or the control (group D, n = 82) for HIFU ablation. In group A, oxytocin was dripped 0.32 IU/min, and HIFU ablation was started one minute after SonoVue injection. In group B, oxytocin was dripped 0.32 IU/min during ablation. In group C, HIFU ablation was started one minute after SonoVue injection. In group D, neither oxytocin nor SonoVue was applied. The clinical data, treatment results, and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

All participants underwent HIFU treatment safely, and the mean energy efficiency factor (EEF) in the four groups was 4.7 ± 0.9J/mm³, 8.5 ± 0.6J/mm³, 8.9 ± 0.7J/mm³, and 12.6 ± 1.8J/mm³, respectively, with the mean ablation time (AT) of 633.7 ± 55.1 s, 874.2 ± 65.6 s, 936.3 ± 85.2 s, and 1103.2 ± 96.2 s, respectively. The non-perfused volume ratios (NPVR) were 90.4 ± 8.8%, 88.7 ± 9.1%, 89.4 ± 7.2%, 80.5 ± 7.9%, respectively. In addition, EEF and AT were the shortest in group A (p < 0.05). NPVR was significantly higher in group A than in the control group D (p < 0.05). The incidence rates of adverse events were not significantly different in the four groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the control group, oxytocin combined with SonoVue in HIFU for adenomyosis can significantly decrease the energy and time needed for the ablation and safely enhance the treatment efficiency by improving the cavitation and heating of HIFU ablation and increasing the non-perfused volume ratio.

A feasibility analysis of the ArcBlate MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound system for the ablation of uterine fibroids

Purpose

Uterine fibroids are benign gynecologic tumors and commonly occur in women by the age of 50. Women with symptomatic uterine fibroids generally receive surgical intervention, while they do not favor the invasive therapies. To evaluate the feasibility and safety of a novel magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU) modality, ArcBlate, in the treatment of uterine fibroids.

Methods

Nine patients with uterine fibroids and one patient with adenomyosis were treated with ArcBlate MRgHIFU. Tumor size and quality of life were evaluated postoperatively at 1 and 3 months by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), respectively.

Results

All patients completed the ArcBlate MRgHIFU procedure and there were no treatment-related adverse effects either during the procedure or during the 3 months of follow-up. Despite limiting the ablation volume to under 50% of the treated fibroid volume as a safety precaution, tumor volumes were markedly reduced in four patients by 15.78–58.87% at 3-month post-treatment. Moreover, SF-36 scale scores had improved at 3 months from baseline by 2–8 points in six patients, indicating relief of symptoms and improved quality of life.

Conclusion

This study evidence demonstrates the safety and feasibility of ArcBlate MRgHIFU and suggests its potential for treating uterine fibroids.

Efficacy of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Combined With GnRH-a for Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is an innovative non-invasive technology used for adenomyosis. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) is a hormone commonly used for adenomyosis. We investigated and assessed the efficacy of HIFU combined with GnRH-a for adenomyosis. Methods: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases for relevant articles published in Chinese or English that compared HIFU combined with GnRH-a vs. HIFU alone in patients with adenomyosis. The last literature search was completed on January 31, 2021. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility and assessed risk of bias. Another two reviewers extracted the data. The RevMan5.3 software was used for the data analysis. Changes in volume of the uterine and adenomyotic lesion were defined as the primary outcomes. The secondary outcomes were visual analog scale (VAS) scores for dysmenorrhea, menstrual volume scores, serum CA125 levels, and recurrence rate. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021234301). Results: Three hundred and ninety potentially relevant articles were screened. Nine studies with data for 766 patients were finally included. Compared with the HIFU alone group, the HIFU combined with GnRH-a group had a higher rate of uterine volume reduction (MD 7.51, 95% CI 5.84-9.17, p < 0.00001), smaller adenomyotic lesion volume (MD 4.11, 95% CI 2.93-5.30, p < 0.00001), lower VAS score for dysmenorrhea (MD 1.27, 95% CI 0.54-2.01, p = 0.0007) and menstrual volume score (MD 0.88, 95% CI 0.73-1.04, p < 0.00001), and lower CA125 level (SMD 0.31, 95% CI 0.05-0.56, p = 0.02) after the procedure. The recurrence rate in the HIFU combined with GnRH-a group was lower than that in the HIFU alone group (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10-0.82, p = 0.02). Conclusions: Compared with HIFU treatment alone, HIFU combined with GnRH-a for the treatment of adenomyosis has greater efficacy in decreasing the volumes of the uterine and adenomyotic lesions and alleviating symptoms. However, since the number of the included studies was too small and most of them were written in Chinese, this conclusion needs to be referenced with caution. And the long-term evidence of its efficacy is still insufficient. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ identifier [CRD42021234].

Clinical evaluation of HIFU combined with GnRH-a and LNG-IUS for adenomyosis patients who failed to respond to drug therapies: two-year follow-up results

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical effect of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in the treatment of adenomyosis patients who failed to respond to drug therapies.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 47 patients with adenomyosis who had failed to respond to drug therapies and had no fertility desires were treated with HIFU combined with GnRH-a and LNG-IUS. The score of dysmenorrhea and menstrual volume were measured at pre and 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-month post-HIFU.

RESULTS

All patients completed HIFU ablation without major postoperative complications. Compared with the symptom scores before the HIFU treatment, the score of dysmenorrhea and menstrual volume decreased significantly at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after HIFU treatment (p < 0.05), but no significant difference was observed between 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after HIFU (p > 0.05). The clinical success rate was 100%, 100%, 95.7% and 93.6% respectively at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after the combined treatment.

CONCLUSION

The combined therapeutic regimen of HIFU, GnRH-a and LNS-IUS is safe and effective, which can be an alternative treatment option for patients with adenomyosis who failed to respond to drug therapies to avoid adenomyomectomy or hysterectomy.

Image-guided thermal ablation in the management of symptomatic adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical effects of image-guided thermal ablation for the treatment of symptomatic adenomyosis (AD).

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov and Google Scholar for literature from January 2000 to September 2020.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

We included all studies reporting clinical outcomes of image-guided thermal ablation for AD, involving high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), percutaneous microwave ablation (PMWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Two independent researchers performed study selection according to the screening criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 38 studies representing 15,908 women were included. Compared with those at baseline, the visual analog scale scores, the symptom severity scores and the menorrhagia severity scores decreased significantly after these thermal ablation therapies. The mean ablation time was 92.18 min, 24.15 min and 31.93 min during HIFU, PMWA and RFA, respectively. The non-perfused volume ratio of AD was 68.3% for HIFU, 82.5% for PMWA and 79.2% for RFA. The reduction rates of uterine volume were 33.6% (HIFU), 46.8% (PMWA) and 44.0% (RFA). The reduction rates of AD volume were 45.1% (HIFU), 74.9% (PMWA) and 61.3% (RFA). The relief rates of dysmenorrhea were 84.2% (HIFU), 89.7% (PMWA) and 89.2% (RFA). The incidence of minor adverse events was 39.0% (HIFU), 51.3% (PMWA) and 3.6% (RFA). The re-intervention rates were 4.0% (HIFU) and 28.7% (RFA). The recurrence rate was 10.2% after HIFU. The pregnancy rates were 16.7% (HIFU), 4.93% (PMWA) and 35.8% (RFA).

CONCLUSION

Image-guided HIFU, PMWA and RFA may be effective and safe minimally invasive therapies for symptomatic AD.

High-intensity focused ultrasound in the management of adenomyosis: long-term results from a single center

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with adenomyosis treated by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From June 2012 to January 2020, 2311 patients with adenomyosis were treated with HIFU at our center, 1982 patients who have complete clinical data were retrospectively reviewed. Among the patients who completed the follow-up, 485 were treated with HIFU alone, 289 were treated with HIFU followed by GnRH-a, 255 were treated with HIFU combined with Mirena and 594 were treated with HIFU combined with GnRH-a and Mirena. The dysmenorrhea severity pain score and average menorrhagia severity score before and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years and 5 years after HIFU were compared. The adverse effects were recorded. In addition, the efficacy between patients treated with GnRH-a and/or Mirena were compared.

RESULTS

After HIFU ablation, the dysmenorrhea severity pain score and the menorrhagia severity score were significantly decreased at each follow-up time point. However, it was observed that as the follow-up time increased, the effective rate of HIFU treatment in improving dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia decreased. The 6 months and 3 years follow-up results showed that the efficacy of HIFU combined with Mirena and HIFU combined with GnRH-a and Mirena were significantly higher than HIFU alone and HIFU combined with GnRH-a (p < 0.05). The major complications were rare.

CONCLUSION

HIFU is a safe and effective treatment for patients with adenomyosis. HIFU combined with Mirena or HIFU combined with GnRH-a and Mirena can significantly enhance the long-term treatment results.

Ultrasound-guided Microwave Ablation in the Management of Symptomatic Uterine Myomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical effects and safety of ultrasound-guided microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of symptomatic uterine myomas.

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar for studies from January 2000 to January 2021.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

We included all studies that reported the clinical outcomes of ultrasound-guided MWA in women with symptomatic uterine myomas. Two researchers conducted the study selection according to the screening criteria.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

We evaluated the risk of bias and evidence quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Two researchers independently extracted information from the included studies. We extracted the standardized mean difference (SMD) and pooled proportion with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for the outcome measures of interest. A total of 10 studies representing 671 patients were included. The Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life (UFS-QoL) questionnaire was used to assess the clinical effects. Compared with baseline, the UFS scores decreased significantly (SMD 3.37; 95% CI, 2.27-4.47; p <.001; reduction rate 65.9%), QoL scores increased significantly (SMD -3.12; 95% CI, -3.93 to -2.30; p <.001; rate of increase 72.0%), and hemoglobin concentration increased significantly (SMD -2.13; 95% CI, -3.44 to -0.81; p = .002; rate of increase 30.3%) at follow-up. The mean operation time was 34.48 minutes (95% CI, 22.82-46.13; p <.001). The rate of reduction in myoma volume after MWA was 85.3% (95% CI, 82.7%-88.0%, p <.001). No major adverse event was reported, and the incidence of minor adverse events was 21.1% (95% CI, 15.1%-27.0%, p <.001).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided MWA is an effective and safe minimally invasive therapy for symptomatic uterine myomas.

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Combined With Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist or Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System in Treating Dysmenorrhea of Severe Adenomyosis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in treating dysmenorrhea in patients with severe adenomyosis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 243 patients diagnosed with severe adenomyosis. Patients were divided into H (received HIFU alone), H-G (received HIFU combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist), and H-L (received HIFU combined with LNG-IUS) groups. Their clinical results were compared at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after treatment.

RESULTS

The effective rates of dysmenorrhea relief in the 3 groups after 3 months were 95.24% in the H group, 98.8% in the H-G group, and 94.74% in the H-L group; those after 6 months were 88.10% in the H group, 95.18% in the H-G group, and 84.21% in the H-L group; those after 12 months were 77.38% in the H group, 79.52% in the H-G group, and 96.05% in the H-L group. There was significant difference in effective rates of dysmenorrhea relief among 3 groups after 12 months of treatment, but not 3 or 6 months. In addition, at 12 months after treatment, there were significant differences in the efficacy of dysmenorrhea between patients of different ages or different ablation rates in group H. However, there was no significant difference in the H-G group and the H-L group.

CONCLUSIONS

High-intensity focused ultrasound alone is effective in alleviating the symptoms of dysmenorrhea in short term. However, HIFU combined with LNG-IUS improves the therapeutic effect for a longer period.

Magnetic resonance imaging T2WI hyperintense foci number and the prognosis of adenomyosis after high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between the number of hyperintense foci of T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and the efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in the treatment of adenomyosis.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study enrolled 102 patients with adenomyosis. Participants were classified into two groups: 50 patients in whom the number of hyperintense foci on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2WI was more than five were placed in the >5 group and 52 patients in whom the number of hyperintense foci on MRI T2WI was five or fewer were placed in the ≤5 group. Uterine fibroid symptoms (UFS) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded as indicators for the course of adenomyosis treatment.

RESULTS

Among the enrolled patients, 84 received HIFU treatment and were followed up. At 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after HIFU treatment, the UFS score of women in the >5 group was higher than that of the patients in the ≤5 group (P < 0.05). The ablation rate of MRI T2WI in the hyperintense foci ≤5 group was higher than the hyperintense foci >5 group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Number of MRI T2WI hyperintense foci is a factor affecting the ablation rate and the clinical efficacy of HIFU treatment in women with adenomyosis. It is likely to be a predictor of the efficacy of HIFU in adenomyosis treatment.

Adenomyosis and Infertility-Review of Medical and Surgical Approaches

The aim of this review is to clarify the relative association between adenomyosis and infertility and the possible treatment for an infertile patient. Although adenomyosis is detected more often in women of late reproductive age, its influence on pregnancy rates is important, especially considering the tendency to delay pregnancy among women in developed countries. In this article, we present a critical analysis of the literature data concerning the impact of adenomyosis on fertility. The possible effects of treatment on the pregnancy rate will also be discussed. We conducted a literature search; publications from Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases published from 1982 to 2019 were retrieved using terms 'adenomyosis and infertility' and 'adenomyosis and pregnancy outcomes', extensively studied in the aspects of diagnosis, pathogenesis of infertility and possible treatment methods. Molecular studies have given deep insight into the pathogenesis of adenomyosis in the recent few years, but there is a huge discrepancy between in vitro studies and praxis. Oral contraceptive pills, anti-prostaglandins, oral or parenteral progestins, danazol and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues have all been used to control menstrual pain and menorrhagia in women with adenomyosis, but they temporarily suppress the menstrual cycle. Additionally, endometrial ablation and hysterectomy used to alleviate pain caused by adenomyosis exclude pregnancy planning. The development of imaging techniques-ultrasound and MRI-enables the diagnosis of adenomyosis with very high accuracy nowadays, but the methods of treatment mentioned above have not given satisfactory results in women planning pregnancy. For these patients, the high-intensity-focused ultrasound method (HIFU) and combined treatment before assisted reproductive techniques can prove beneficial in adenomyosis patients.

High-intensity focused ultrasound for treatment of recurrent uterine leiomyosarcoma: a case report and literature review

Uterine leiomyosarcoma has the characteristics of high malignancy, a poor prognosis, and a high recurrence rate. Surgery is the main treatment option, supplemented by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. We report on a patient with recurrent uterine leiomyosarcoma who was treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with chemotherapy. Tumor growth was controlled and the patient's survival time was prolonged. High-intensity focused ultrasound combined with chemotherapy may thus provide a new treatment strategy for patients with recurrent and surgically difficult uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Adenomyosis: diagnostics and treatment

Background

Adenomyosis is a frequent additional condition in patients with endometriosis and should be included in diagnostic and treatment concepts.

Objective

Description of diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in patients with adenomyosis in relation to patient age, family planning status, peritoneal and/or deep endometriosis and symptoms.

Methods

The current literature on adenomyosis including case reports was analyzed. Due to the lack of evidenced-based approaches the most probable trends in diagnostics and treatment are discussed.

Results

Adenomyosis plays an important role in fertile patients with dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia and pelvic pain, with or without additional peritoneal or deep endometriosis. It has a negative impact on fertility and can cause a variety of symptoms. The disease can be diagnosed by a skilled examiner and treatment concepts exist.

Conclusion

Adenomyosis can be diagnosed by a combination of clinical history, gynecological examination, transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Various medical and surgical treatment approaches are available to reduce symptoms and to increase fertility. The course of action depends on the family planning status of the patient.

Uterine polyps, adenomyosis, leiomyomas, and endometrial receptivity

Endometrial polyps, adenomyosis, and leiomyomas are commonly encountered abnormalities frequently found in both fertile women and those with infertility. The clinician is frequently challenged to determine which of these entities, when found, is likely to impair fertility, and which are "innocent bystanders" unrelated to the problem at hand. Although removing an endometrial polyp may be seen as a relatively benign and safe intervention, myomectomy, and in particular adenomyomectomy, can be substantive surgical procedures, associated with their own potential for disrupting fertility. One of the mechanisms thought to be involved when these entities are contributing to infertility is an adverse impact on endometrial receptivity. Indeed polyps, adenomyosis, and leiomyomas have all been associated with an increased likelihood of abnormal endometrial molecular expressions thought to impair implantation and early embryo development. This review is designed to examine the relationship of these common entities to endometrial receptivity and to identify evidence gaps that should be considered when strategizing research initiatives. It is apparent that we have the tools necessary to fill these gaps, but it will be necessary to approach the issue in a strategic and coordinated fashion. It is likely that we will have to recognize the limitations of imaging alone and look to the evidence-based addition of molecular analysis to provide the individualized phenotyping of disease necessary for patient-specific treatment decisions.

Combined therapeutic effects of HIFU, GnRH-a and LNG-IUS for the treatment of severe adenomyosis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the combined efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) for the treatment of severe adenomyosis.

METHOD

Four hundred and sixty-six patients with adenomyosis admitted to the Department of Gynecology of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital underwent HIFU treatment, and then were consecutively administered with GnRH-a 1 d, 1 month and 3 months after HIFU treatment. The uterine size was then measured with ultrasound or MRI 2-4 weeks after three cycles of GnRH-a injection. The LNG-IUS was then inserted when the uterine length less than 9 cm. The visual analog scale (VAS), verbal rating scale (VRS), menstrual volume score, uterus volume, MRI, serum levels of hemoglobin and CA125 were measured at pre and 3-, 6-, 12-month post-HIFU.

RESULTS

Dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia significantly relieved after combined treatment with HIFU, GnRH-a and the LNS-IUS. The uterine volume shrank and returned to its normal size. The serum CA-125 level was reduced to the normal level after the combined treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined therapeutic regimen of HIFU, GnRH-a and LNS-IUS is safe, effective and efficient for curing severe adenomyosis.

Endometriosis treatment with shock waves: A novel approach

Endometriosis affects 10-15% of women. When medication is unsatisfactory, not well tolerated or unwanted, surgery remains the sole option. There is a need for a less invasive treatment. We suggest the application of shock wave therapy (SWT) to endometriotic nodules (including deep infiltrating endometriosis), endometriomas and adenomyosis. We hypothesize pain relief via an antiinflammatory effect, an antioxidant effect and neural pathways modulation, as well as a direct effect on the lesions by the energy thus delivered. Questions to be answered before a clinical application is tested include route of administration (external versus internal transducers), dose regimen, optimal duration of treatment and type of shock waves used (focalised versus radial).

Clinical Usefulness of the Microbubble Contrast Agent SonoVue in Enhancing the Effects of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Adenomyosis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical usefulness of the microbubble contrast agent SonoVue in enhancing high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for the treatment of adenomyosis.

METHODS

A total of 102 patients with adenomyosis, assessed from August 2015 to April 2017, were randomly divided into 1-minute (A) and 10-minute (B) groups, respectively. In groups A and B, HIFU started 1 minute and 10 minutes, respectively, after SonoVue injection. All patients underwent a magnetic resonance imaging scan before and after HIFU treatment.

RESULTS

The occurrence rates of massive gray scale change, nonperfused volume, and fractional ablation were similar in both groups (P > .05). Meanwhile, sonication time to massive gray scale change was reduced in group A compared with group B (P < .05). In addition, mean power, total energy, and energy efficiency factor were lower in group A than group B (all P < .05). The incidence rates of most perioperative and all postoperative adverse events were similar in both groups (P > .05). The incidence rates of pain in the treated region, leg pain, and sciatic or buttock pain during HIFU were substantially lower in group A than group B (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, starting HIFU sonication at 1 minute after SonoVue injection enhances HIFU ablation by cavitation and heating and is safe. Early massive gray scale change, lower total energy, and reduced mean power are potential safety factors.