Nuchal translucency of 3.0-3.4 mm an indication for NIPT or microarray? Cohort analysis and literature review

Clinical value of screening prenatal ultrasound combined with chromosomal microarrays in prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical value of ultrasound findings in the screening of fetal chromosomal abnormalities and the analysis of risk factors for chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) abnormalities.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the datasets of 15,899 pregnant women who underwent prenatal evaluations at Affiliated Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Nantong University between August 2018 and December 2022. Everyone underwent ultrasound screening, and those with abnormal findings underwent CMA to identify chromosomal abnormalities.

RESULTS

The detection rates for isolated ultrasound anomalies and combined ultrasound and CMA anomalies were 11.81% (1877/15,899) and 2.40% (381/15,899), respectively. Among all ultrasound abnormalities, detection rates for isolated ultrasound soft marker anomalies, isolated structural abnormalities, and both ultrasound soft marker anomalies with structural abnormalities were 82.91% (1872/2258), 15.99% (361/2258), and 1.11% (25/2258), respectively. The detection rate of abnormal chromosomes in pregnant women with abnormal ultrasound results was 16.87% (381/2258). The detection rates were 13.33% in cases with two or more ultrasound soft markers anomalies, 47.37% for two or more structural anomalies, and 48.00% for concomitant ultrasound soft marker and structural anomalies.

CONCLUSIONS

Enhanced detection rates of chromosomal anomalies in fetal malformations are achieved with specific ultrasound findings (NT thickening, cardiovascular abnormalities, and multiple soft markers) or when combined with high-risk factors (advanced maternal age, familial history, parental chromosomal anomalies, etc.). When the maternal age is over 35 and with ≥2 ultrasound soft marker anomalies accompanied with any high-risk factors, CMA testing can aid in the diagnosis of prenatal chromosomal abnormalities.

Advancing fetal diagnosis and prognostication using comprehensive prenatal phenotyping and genetic testing

Prenatal diagnoses of congenital malformations have increased significantly in recent years with use of high-resolution prenatal imaging. Despite more precise radiological diagnoses, discussions with expectant parents remain challenging because congenital malformations are associated with a wide spectrum of outcomes. Comprehensive prenatal genetic testing has become an essential tool that improves the accuracy of prognostication. Testing strategies include chromosomal microarray, exome sequencing, and genome sequencing. The diagnostic yield varies depending on the specific malformations, severity of the abnormalities, and multi-organ involvement. The utility of prenatal genetic diagnosis includes increased diagnostic clarity for clinicians and families, informed pregnancy decision-making, neonatal care planning, and reproductive planning. Turnaround time for results of comprehensive genetic testing remains a barrier, especially for parents that are decision-making, although this has improved over time. Uncertainty inherent to many genetic testing results is a challenge. Appropriate genetic counseling is essential for parents to understand the diagnosis and prognosis and to make informed decisions. Recent research has investigated the yield of exome or genome sequencing in structurally normal fetuses, both with non-invasive screening methods and invasive diagnostic testing; the prenatal diagnostic community must evaluate and analyze the significant ethical considerations associated with this practice prior to generalizing its use. IMPACT: Reviews available genetic testing options during the prenatal period in detail. Discusses the impact of prenatal genetic testing on care using case-based examples. Consolidates the current literature on the yield of genetic testing for prenatal diagnosis of congenital malformations.

First-Trimester Ultrasound Screening in Routine Obstetric Practice

Technologic advances and ultrasonographer-physician experience in fetal imaging have led to significant improvements in our ability to distinguish between normal and abnormal fetal structural development in the latter part of the first trimester. As a critical component of pregnancy care, assessment of fetal anatomy at the end of the first trimester with a standardized imaging protocol should be offered to all pregnant patients regardless of aneuploidy screening results because it has been demonstrated to identify approximately half of fetal structural malformations. Early identification of abnormalities allows focused genetic counseling, timely diagnostic testing, and subspecialist consultation. In addition, a normal ultrasound examination result offers some degree of reassurance to most patients. Use of cell-free DNA alone for aneuploidy screening while foregoing an accompanying early anatomic evaluation of the fetus will result in many anomalies that are typically detected in the first trimester not being identified until later in pregnancy, thus potentially diminishing the quality of obstetric care for pregnant individuals and possibly limiting their reproductive options, including pregnancy termination.

Selection of prenatal screening with nuchal translucency > 95th centile and below 99th centile: a 4-year observational study with real-world data

OBJECTIVE

We sought to analyze the genetic outcomes of fetuses with nuchal translucency (NT) > 95th centile, and determine whether prenatal genetic counseling, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) or non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) are truly beneficial for the outcomes of fetuses with increased NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 535 pregnant women were included in this study, with a fetal NT > 95th centile at 11-13+6 weeks of gestation from January 2017 to December 2020. 324 pregnant women with fetal NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile combined with other risk factors and NT > 99th centile received prenatal diagnostic karyotype analysis and CMA, and 211 pregnant women with fetal isolated increased NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile were selected to carry out NIPT.

RESULTS

A total of 211 pregnant women who underwent NIPT were included in the study, NIPT results showed that 8 high-risk cases were confirmed by prenatal diagnosis. Overall, the detection rate of NIPT was 3.79%. A total of 324 pregnant women with fetal NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile, along with other risk factors, and those with fetal NT > 99th centile, received karyotype analysis and CMA for prenatal diagnosis. Among them, a total of 73 genetic abnormalities were detected, including 45 cases of chromosomal aneuploidy, 7 cases of structural abnormalities, and 21 cases of copy number variations (CNVs) with a size of less than 10 Mb. In addition, the 73 women with genetic abnormalities are divided into three groups based on the NT measurement (Group 1: Fetuses with NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile, Group 2: Fetuses with NT > 99th centile, and Group 3: Fetuses with NT > 99th centile). 13.11% (8/61) of pathogenic genetic abnormalities (6 chromosomal aneuploidy, 1 structural abnormality, and 1 likely pathogenic CNV) will be missed if genetic counseling and prenatal genetic testing were not conducted in fetuses with increased NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile combined with other risks. Pathogenic CNVs were the most common abnormalities in group 3, and one likely pathogenic CNV was detected in group 1 and group 3, respectively, and a total of 14 CNVs of unknown clinical significance (VOUS) were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Through this study, we demonstrated that the critical value of NT > 95th centile for invasive detection or NIPT. Invasive testing combined with CMA may be recommended for fetuses with NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile and with other risks. But when isolated NT > 95th centile and below 99th centile, NIPT would be appropriate.

Enhancing Fetal Anomaly Detection in Ultrasonography Images: A Review of Machine Learning-Based Approaches

Fetal development is a critical phase in prenatal care, demanding the timely identification of anomalies in ultrasound images to safeguard the well-being of both the unborn child and the mother. Medical imaging has played a pivotal role in detecting fetal abnormalities and malformations. However, despite significant advances in ultrasound technology, the accurate identification of irregularities in prenatal images continues to pose considerable challenges, often necessitating substantial time and expertise from medical professionals. In this review, we go through recent developments in machine learning (ML) methods applied to fetal ultrasound images. Specifically, we focus on a range of ML algorithms employed in the context of fetal ultrasound, encompassing tasks such as image classification, object recognition, and segmentation. We highlight how these innovative approaches can enhance ultrasound-based fetal anomaly detection and provide insights for future research and clinical implementations. Furthermore, we emphasize the need for further research in this domain where future investigations can contribute to more effective ultrasound-based fetal anomaly detection.

Isolated Increased Nuchal Translucency With Normal Chromosomal Study: A Case Report

Increased nuchal translucency (NT) leads to a higher risk of fetal structural abnormalities. The measurement between 11 and 14 weeks gestation is a reliable marker for associated chromosomal abnormalities. Here, we present the case of a 33-year-old female with isolated high NT in the range of 5.6 mm at 12 weeks of gestational age. She was evaluated for chromosomal and structural abnormality and followed up meticulously. None of the tests showed any chromosomal or obvious structural abnormality. Fetal echocardiography revealed no structural cardiac defect. The pregnancy was uneventful and she delivered a healthy baby at term through lower (uterine)-segment cesarean section. The baby girl is living in good health without any developmental abnormalities. Although there is a high risk of chromosomal/structural defects with increased NT, it is not mandatory to terminate the pregnancy without a thorough evaluation.

Application of non-invasive prenatal testing in screening chromosomal aberrations in pregnancies with different nuchal translucency cutoffs

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficiency of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in cases with different cutoffs of nuchal translucency (NT).

METHODS

The study retrospectively analyses pregnancies with NT ≥ 2.5 mm who underwent NIPT. Results of NT, NIPT, chromosomal diagnostic and pregnancy outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

Study group was composed of 1470 single pregnancies, including 864 with NT 2.5-2.9 mm, 350 with NT 3.0-3.4 mm and 256 with NT ≥ 3.5 mm. Non-significant differences were found in the positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPT between different cutoffs of NT. There was one false positive case with NT 4.3 mm, screening for 47,XYY in NIPT showed normal in diagnostic testing. For cases with normal NIPT results, the residual risk is 1:20 (5%, 95%CI: 0.1-10.1%) in fetuses with NT 3.0-3.4 mm and 1:15 (6.5%, 95%CI: 1.4%-11.5%) in fetuses with NT ≥ 3.5 mm. These false negative cases included one trisomy 21, seven pathogenic CNVs, one uniparental disomy and one single gene disorders.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrated that the PPV of NIPT for screening chromosomal aberrations were similarly in different NT cutoffs, while false positive case does exist. After normal in NIPT, risk for chromosomal aberrations remained, especially pathogenic CNV and even common trisomy. Therefore, prenatal diagnosis was recommended and CMA was suggested to apply in pregnancies with NT ≥ 3.0 mm.

Identification of Fetuses at Increased Risk of Trisomies in the First Trimester Using Axial Planes

INTRODUCTION

The measurement of nuchal translucency (NT) is crucial for assessing risk of aneuploidies in the first trimester. We investigate the ability of NT assessed by a transverse view of the fetal head to detect fetuses at increased risk of common aneuploidies at 11-13 weeks of gestation.

METHODS

We enrolled a nonconsecutive series of women who attended our outpatient clinic from January 2020 to April 2021 for aneuploidy screening by means of a first trimester combined test. All women were examined by operators certified by the Fetal Medicine Foundation. In each patient, NT measurements were obtained both from the median sagittal view and transverse view. We calculated the risk of aneuploidy using NT measurements obtained both with sagittal and axial scans, and then we compared the results.

RESULTS

A total of 1,023 women were enrolled. An excellent correlation was found between sagittal and transverse NT measurements. The sensitivity and specificity of the axial scan to identify fetuses that were deemed at risk of trisomy 21 using standard sagittal scans were 40/40 = 100.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91.2-100.0) and 977/983 = 99.4% (95% CI: 98.7-99.7), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the axial scan to identify fetuses at risk of trisomy 13 or 18 were 16/16 = 100.0% (95% CI: 80.6-100.0) and 1,005/1,007 = 99.8% (95% CI: 99.3-99.9).

CONCLUSIONS

When the sonogram, a part of combined test screening, is performed by an expert sonologist, axial views can reliably identify fetuses at increased risk of trisomies without an increase in false negative results.

Late first-trimester ultrasound findings can alter management after high-risk NIPT result

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of detailed late first-trimester ultrasound (LFTU) on the positive predictive value (PPV) of a high-risk non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) result for various chromosomal abnormalities.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of all cases undergoing invasive prenatal testing from three tertiary providers of obstetric ultrasound over 4 years, each using NIPT as a first-line screening test. Data were collected from pre-NIPT ultrasound, NIPT, LFTU, placental serology and later ultrasound examinations. Prenatal testing for chromosomal abnormalities was performed by microarray, initially using array comparative genomic hybridization and then single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array for the last 2 years. Uniparental disomy testing was performed by SNP array during all 4 years. The majority of NIPT tests were analyzed using the Illumina platform, initially confined to the assessment of the common autosomal trisomies, sex chromosome aneuploidies and rare autosomal trisomies (RAT), then extending to genome-wide analysis for the last 2 years.

RESULTS

Amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS) was performed on 2657 patients, 1352 (51%) of whom had undergone prior NIPT, with 612 (45%) of these returning a high-risk result and meeting the inclusion criteria for the study. LFTU findings significantly affected the PPV of the NIPT result for trisomies 13 (T13), 18 (T18) and 21 (T21), monosomy X (MX) and RAT but not for the other sex chromosomal abnormalities or segmental imbalances (> 7 Mb). Abnormal LFTU increased the PPV close to 100% for T13, T18, T21, MX and RAT. The magnitude of the change in PPV was highest for the most severe chromosomal abnormalities. When LFTU was normal, the incidence of confined placental mosaicism (CPM) was highest in those with a high-risk NIPT result for T13, followed by T18 and T21. After normal LFTU, the PPV for T21, T18, T13 and MX decreased to 68%, 57%, 5% and 25%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

LFTU after a high-risk NIPT result can alter the PPV for many chromosomal abnormalities, assisting counseling regarding invasive prenatal testing and pregnancy management. The high PPVs of NIPT for T21 and T18 are not sufficiently modified by normal LFTU findings to alter management. These at-risk patients should be offered CVS for earlier diagnosis, particularly given the low rate of CPM associated with these aneuploidies. Patients with a high-risk NIPT result for T13 and normal LFTU findings often wait for amniocentesis or avoid invasive testing altogether given the low PPV and higher rate of CPM in this context. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

When NIPT meets WES, prenatal diagnosticians face the dilemma: genetic etiological analysis of 2,328 cases of NT thickening and follow-up of pregnancy outcomes

Objective: To assess the performance of diverse prenatal diagnostic approaches for nuchal translucency (NT) thickening and to investigate the optimal prenatal screening or diagnostic action with a NT thickening of 95th percentile-3.50 mm. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 2,328 pregnancies with NT ≥ 95th percentile through ultrasound-guided transabdominal chorionic villus sampling (CVS), amniocentesis, or cordocentesis obtained clinical samples (chorionic villi, amniotic fluid, and cord blood), and real-time quantitative fluorescent PCR (QF-PCR), chromosome karyotyping (CS), chromosome microarray analysis (CMA), or whole exome sequencing (WES) were provided to identify genetic etiologies. Results: In this study, the incidence of chromosomal defects increased with NT thickness. When NT ≥ 6.5 mm, 71.43% were attributed to genetic abnormalities. The 994 gravidas with fetal NT thickening underwent short tandem repeat (STR), CS, and CMA. In 804 fetuses with normal karyotypes, CMA detected 16 (1.99%) extra pathogenic or likely pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs). The incremental yield of CMA was only 1.16% (3/229) and 3.37% (10/297) in the group with NT 95th percentile-2.99 mm and NT 3.0-3.49 mm, separately. Among the 525 gravidas with fetal NT thickening who underwent STR, CMA, and WES, the incremental yield of WES was 4.09% (21/513). In the group of NT 95th percentile-2.99 mm, there were no additional single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) detected in WES, while in 143 cases with NT of 3.0-3.49 mm, the incremental yield of WES was 5.59% (8/143). Conclusion: In the group of NT 95th percentile-3.0 mm, since chromosomal aneuploidy and chromosomal copy number variation were the primary causes and the additional contribution of CMA and WES was not significant, we recommend NIPT-Plus for pregnant women with a NT thickening of 95th percentile-3.0 mm first. In addition, comprehensive prenatal genetic testing involving CMA and WES can benefit pregnancies with NT thickening of 3.0-3.49 mm.

[Management of isolated increased nuchal translucency: survey among the Pluridisciplinary Centers for Prenatal Diagnosis]

OBJECTIVES

The management for isolated increased nuchal translucency (NT) in the first trimester with a normal karyotype and normal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) is not consensual. The aim was to perform a survey among the Pluridisciplinary Centers for Prenatal Diagnosis (CPDPN) in France regarding their management of increased NT in the first trimester.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter descriptive survey between September 2021 and October 2021 among the 46 CPDPNs of France.

RESULTS

The response rate was 56.5% (n = 26/46). The NT thickness threshold for which invasive diagnosis testing is performed is 3.0mm in 23.1% of centers (n = 6/26) and 3.5mm in 76.9% of centers (n = 20/26). A CMA was performed alone in 26.9% of centers (n = 7/26) while 7.7% of centers (n = 2/26) did not perform a CMA. The gestational age for the first reference ultrasound scan was 16 to 18 WG in 88.5% of centers (n = 23/26), while it was not performed before 22 WG in 11.5% of centers (n = 3/26). Fetal echocardiography is proposed systematically in 73.1% of centers (n = 19/26).

CONCLUSION

There is heterogeneity in the management of increased NT in the first trimester among the CPDPNs in France. In case of increased NT on first trimester ultrasound scan, the NT thickness threshold for which invasive diagnosis testing is performed varies from 3.0 mm or 3.5mm depending on the center. Moreover, CMA and early reference morphological ultrasound scan between 16 and 18 WG were not systematically performed, despite the current data suggesting their interest.

New insights on partial trisomy 3q syndrome: de novo 3q27.1-q29 duplication in a newborn with pre and postnatal overgrowth and assisted reproductive conception

BACKGROUND

Duplications of the long arm of chromosome 3 are rare, and associated to a well-defined contiguous gene syndrome known as partial trisomy 3q syndrome. It has been first described in 1966 by Falek et al., and since then around 100 patients have been reported. Clinical manifestations include characteristic facial dysmorphic features, microcephaly, hirsutism, congenital heart disease, genitourinary anomalies, hand and feet abnormalities, growth disturbances and intellectual disability. Most of cases are due to unbalanced translocations, inherited from a parent carrying a balanced aberration (reciprocal translocation or inversion), and rarely the genomic anomaly arises de novo. Very few studies report on the prenatal identification of such rearrangements.

CASE PRESENTATION

Hereby, we report on a newborn with a rare pure duplication of the long arm of chromosome 3. Noninvasive prenatal test (cell free fetal DNA analysis on maternal blood), performed for advanced parental age and use of assisted reproductive technique, evidenced a partial 3q trisomy. Then, invasive cytogenetic (standard and molecular) investigations, carried out through amniocentesis, confirmed and defined a 3q27.1-q29 duplication spanning 10.9 Mb, and including about 80 genes. Our patient showed clinical findings (typical facial dysmorphic features, esotropia, short neck, atrial septal defect, hepatomegaly, mild motor delay) compatible with partial trisomy 3q syndrome diagnosis, in addition to pre- and postnatal overgrowth.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced parental age increases the probability of chromosomal and/or genomic anomalies, while ART that of epigenomic defects. Both conditions, thus, deserve more careful prenatal monitoring and screening/diagnostic investigations. Among the latter, cell free fetal DNA testing can detect large segmental aneuploidies, along with chromosomal abnormalities. It identified in our patient a wide 3q rearrangement, then confirmed and defined through invasive molecular cytogenetic analysis. Neonatologists and pediatricians must be aware of the potential risks associated to duplication syndromes. Therefore, they should offer to affected subjects an adequate management and early and careful follow-up. These may be able to guarantee to patients satisfactory growth and development profiles, prevent and/or limit neurodevelopmental disorders, and timely recognition of complications.

Prenatal phenotype of 47, XXY (Klinefelter syndrome)

OBJECTIVE

There is a paucity of knowledge regarding the prenatal presentation of Klinefelter syndrome, or 47, XXY. Accurate prenatal counseling is critical and in utero diagnosis is currently limited by a poor understanding of the prenatal phenotype of this condition.

METHODS

This is a case series of fetuses with cytogenetically confirmed 47, XXY in the prenatal period or up to age 5 years, with prenatal records available for review from four academic institutions between 2006 and 2019. Ultrasound reports were reviewed in detail to assess for increased nuchal translucency and structural abnormalities. Additionally, we reviewed results of cell-free DNA and serum analyte testing when performed to inform our understanding of the detection of fetal 47, XXY through standard genetic screening tests.

RESULTS

Forty-one cases with confirmed cytogenetic diagnosis of 47, XXY and prenatal records available for review were identified: 37 had a prenatal diagnosis and 4 had a postnatal diagnosis. Nuchal translucency was increased ≥3.0 mm in 23.1% (6/26) of cases with a documented measurement. In 29.2% (7/24) of cases with a second trimester anatomical ultrasound available for review, a fetal abnormality was identified (3 brain anomalies, 1 cardiac abnormality, 1 echogenic bowel, and 2 limb abnormalities). Among those who had cell-free DNA and serum analytes performed, 92.6% (25/27) and 36.3% (4/11) had an abnormal result respectively.

CONCLUSION

This case series expands our knowledge of the prenatal presentation of 47, XXY by identifying first and second trimester fetal sonographic abnormalities. Prenatal identification of this condition enables accurate counseling, focused prenatal management, and early postnatal interventions to ameliorate some of the known complications.

Array study in fetuses with nuchal translucency above the 95th percentile: a 4-year observational single-centre study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the performance of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in fetuses with nuchal translucency (NT) > 95th percentile. Secondary objectives were to analyze these results according to NT thickness, below or above 3.5 mm, and those without associated anomalies.

METHODS

This observational single-cohort study was conducted between 2015 and 2018 in fetuses with NT > 95th percentile. Following an invasive test, quantitative fluorescence-polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) was performed, and if normal, CMA was performed. Pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs), non-reported pathogenic CNV, pathogenic autosomal recessive variants and variants of unknown significance (VUS) were analysed.

RESULTS

One-hundred and sixty-two fetuses with NT > 95th percentile, normal QF-PCR and CMA were included. Amongst 128 fetuses with NT between the 95th percentile and 3.5 mm, one (0.8%) had a pathogenic CNV, four (3.1%) had non-reported pathogenic CNV, one (0.8%) had pathogenic autosomal recessive variant and 13 (10.2%) had VUS. Amongst 34 fetuses with NT ≥ 3.5 mm, four (11.8%) had pathogenic CNV, one (2.9%) had non-reported pathogenic CNV, one (2.9%) had pathogenic autosomal recessive variant and four (11.8%) had VUS. Four in 162 (2.5%) fetuses had CNVs at the chromosome 16p13.11 region. Amongst 154 fetuses without structural abnormalities and normal QF-PCR, three (1.9%) had a pathogenic CNV, 5 (3.2%) had non-reported pathogenic CNV, one (0.6%) autosomal recessive pathogenic CNV and 16 (10.4%) had VUS.

CONCLUSION

Pathogenic CNVs were found in 1% of fetuses with an NT thickness between the 95^th percentile and 3.5 mm and in 12% of fetuses with NT ≥ 3.5 mm. CNVs were found at the 16p13.11 region in 2.5% of cases.

A Pain in the Neck: Lessons Learnt from Genetic Testing in Fetuses Detected with Nuchal Fluid Collections, Increased Nuchal Translucency versus Cystic Hygroma-Systematic Review of the Literature, Meta-Analysis and Case Series

Fetal Nuchal fluid collections can manifest with two distinct presentations attributable to the same phenotypic spectrum: increased nuchal translucency (iNT) and cystic hygroma. The prenatal detection of these findings should prompt an accurate assessment through genetic counseling and testing, including karyotype, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and multigene RASopathy panel. We performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis, to calculate diagnostic yields of genetic testing in fetuses with iNT and cystic hygroma. We compared the results with a cohort of 96 fetuses with these isolated findings. Fetuses with isolated NT ≥ 2.5 mm showed karyotype anomalies in 22.76% of cases and CMA presented an incremental detection rate of 2.35%. Fetuses with isolated NT ≥ 3 mm presented aneuploidies in 14.36% of cases and CMA had an incremental detection rate of 3.89%. When the isolated NT measured at least 3.5 mm the diagnostic yield of karyotyping was 34.35%, the incremental CMA detection rate was 4.1%, the incremental diagnostic rate of the RASopathy panel was 1.44% and it was 2.44% for exome sequencing. Interestingly, CMA presents a considerable diagnostic yield in the group of fetuses with NT ≥ 3.5 mm. Similarly, exome sequencing appears to show promising results and could be considered after a negative CMA result.

Application of chromosome microarray analysis and karyotyping in diagnostic assessment of abnormal Down syndrome screening results

Background

Down syndrome (DS) is the most common congenital cause of intellectual disability and also leads to numerous metabolic and structural problems. This study aims to explore the application value of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis for pregnant women with abnormal DS screening results.

Methods

The study recruited 1452 pregnant women with abnormal DS screening results including 493 with an enlarged nuchal translucency thickness (NT ≥ 2.5 mm) and 959 with an abnormal second-trimester maternal serum biomarker screening results. They underwent amniocentesis to obtain amniotic fluid for CMA and karyotyping.

Results

CMA identified 74/1452 abnormal results, which was more efficient than karyotyping (51/1452, P < 0.05.) CMA is equivalent to traditional karyotyping for identifying aneuploidies. Compared to karyotyping CMA identified 1.90% more copy number variants (CNVs) ranging from 159Kb to 6496Kb. However, 34.4% of them were recurrent pathogenic CNVs associated with risk of neurodevelopmental disorders. CMA identified 13 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) results and 1 maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) of chromosome 7. Karyotyping identified 3 mosaic sex chromosome aneuploidy and 4 balanced translocation which could not be identified by CMA. In enlarged NT group, karyotyping identified 80.9% abnormal results while in serum screening group karyotyping identified 35.7%. However, the incidence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) CNVs was nearly the same in both groups. That was because aneuploidies and gross duplication/deletion were previously screened out by NT scan.

Conclusions

CMA and karyotyping have both advantages and disadvantages in prenatal diagnosis of pregnant women with abnormal DS screening results. However, there was not enough evidence to support routine CMA in pregnant women with abnormal DS screening results.

Increased nuchal translucency can be ascertained using transverse planes

BACKGROUND

The detection of increased nuchal translucency is crucial for the assessment risk of aneuploidies and other fetal anomalies.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the ability of a transverse view of the fetal head to detect increased fetal nuchal translucency at 11 to 13 weeks of gestation.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective study enrolling a nonconsecutive series of women who attended our outpatient clinic from January 2020 to April 2021 for combined screening and were examined by operators certified by the Fetal Medicine Foundation. In each patient, nuchal translucency measurements were obtained both from a median sagittal view and from a transverse view. A second sonologist blinded to the results of the first examination obtained another measurement to assess intermethod and interobsever reproducibility.

RESULTS

A total of 1023 women were enrolled. An excellent correlation was found between sagittal and transverse nuchal translucency measurements, with a mean difference of 0.01 mm (95% confidence interval, -0.01 to 0.02). No systematic difference was found between the 2 techniques. The inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.957; 95% confidence interval, 0.892-0.983) and intrarater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.976; 95% confidence interval, 0.941-0.990) of axial measurements were almost perfect. Transverse measurements of 3.0 mm identified all cases with sagittal measurements of ≥3.0 with a specificity of 99.7%; transverse measurements of >3.2 mm identified all cases with sagittal measurements of 3.5 mm with a specificity of 99.7%. The time required to obtain transverse nuchal translucency measurements was considerably shorter than for sagittal measurements, particularly when the fetus had an unfavorable position.

CONCLUSION

When the sonogram is performed by an expert sonologist, the difference in nuchal translucency measurement obtained with a transverse or sagittal plane is minimal. Increased nuchal translucency can be reliably identified by using transverse views, and in some cases, this may technically be advantageous.

Non-invasive prenatal testing for the detection of trisomy 13, 18, and 21 and sex chromosome aneuploidies in 68,763 cases

Objectives: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been widely used in recent years. According to clinical experience from all hospitals providing prenatal screening services in Beijing, we explored the feasibility of using NIPT for the analysis of common foetal aneuploidies among pregnancies.

Methods: In total, 68,763 maternal blood samples were collected from January 2020 to December 2020 at the Beijing prenatal diagnosis agency. Cases with positive screening results by NIPT detection were validated using prenatal diagnosis.

Results: In total, 920 cases had a high-risk NIPT result, and 755 cases were shown to be truly positive by a chromosome karyotyping analysis; the prenatal diagnosis rate was 82.07% (755/920). Of the920 cases, there were 164 cases of T21, 70 cases of T18, 38 cases of T13, 360 cases of SCAs and 288 cases of other chromosomal abnormalities. The positive rates of T21, T18, T13, and SCAs were 0.24% (164/68,763), 0.10% (70/68,763), 0.06% (38/68,763) and 0.52% (360/68,763), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity were 98.17% and 99.92% for T21, 96.15% and 99.93% for T18, and 100% and 99.95% for T13, respectively. The PPVs of T21,T18,T13 and SCAs were65.24% (107/164), 35.71% (25/70), 18.42% (7/38) and 31.39% (113/360), respectively. For all indications, there were more higher T21/18/13 in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group (comprising only cases of voluntary request), with a positive rate of 0.46% vs. 0.27% (p < 0.001), sensitivity of 99.16% vs. 91.30% (p = 0.02) and PPV of 56.73%vs.32.81% (p = 0.001), but there was no significant difference in specificity between the groups (p = 0.71). The detection indication with the highest PPV (100%) by NIPT was ultrasound structural abnormalities and ultrasound soft marker abnormalities for T21 and ultrasound structural abnormalities and NT thickening for T18 and T13. The PPVs of different clinical indications of T21 (p = 0.002), T13 (p = 0.04) and SACs (p = 0.02) were statistically significant.

Conclusion: The high specificity, efficiency and safety (non-invasiveness) of NIPT can effectively improve the detection rate of common chromosomal aneuploidy, thereby reducing the occurrence of birth defects. We should encourage pregnant women with NIPT-high-risk results to undergo a prenatal diagnosis to determine whether the foetus has chromosomal abnormalities. More importantly, the screening efficiency of NIPT in the low-risk group was significantly lower than that in the high-risk group. Therefore, the use of NIPT in low-risk groups should be fully promoted, and socioeconomic benefits should be considered.

Does isolated nuchal translucency from 2.5 to 2.9 mm increase the risk of fetal chromosome disease?

Increased fetal nuchal translucency (NT) is a common ultrasonic manifestation during pregnancy. Many studies have confirmed that NT ≥ 3 mm is a high risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome. However, when NT is between 2.5 and 2.9 mm, will it increase the risk of fetal chromosome abnormalities and other diseases? What is the most appropriate method for prenatal chromosome evaluation? At present, it has not been widely reported in the literature, and the conclusion is also controversial. This prospective cohort study included fetal samples from women who underwent amniocentesis from 2017 to 2020. The samples of the experimental group were fetuses with NT ≥ 2.5 mm at 11 to 13 + 6 weeks of gestation, with or without ultrasonographic anomaly. The control group contained fetal NT < 2.5 mm without ultrasonographic anomalies. All amniotic fluid samples were tested by copy number variants sequencing. In 262 fetal samples with isolated NT from 2.5 to 2.9 mm, the detection rate of aneuploidy was 3.4% (9/262), and the risk of aneuploidy was significantly higher than that of the control group (1.4%, 32/2331) (relative risk 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-5.2). The detection rates of other pathogenic/likely pathogenic copy number variants in the two groups were 0.8% (2/262) and 1.3% (31/2331), respectively, which was not statistically significant (relative risk 0.6, 95% CI 0.1-2.4). Our results showed that isolated NT from 2.5 to 2.9 mm increased the risk of fetal chromosome aneuploidy. Therefore, noninvasive prenatal screening is recommended as the first choice for prenatal chromosome evaluation in this population.

Outcome of pregnancies with first-trimester increased nuchal translucency and cystic hygroma in a tertiary maternity hospital in United Arab Emirates

OBJECTIVE

To study the outcome of pregnancies with first-trimester increased nuchal translucency and cystic hygromas.

METHODOLOGY

Retrospective study of 132 pregnancies with first-trimester increased nuchal translucency and cystic hygromas, between January 2015 to December 2018 at Corniche Hospital, Abu Dhabi, UAE. Fetal karyotyping, detailed ultrasound at 18-22 weeks and fetal echocardiography were offered to all women. Adverse outcomes included miscarriage, intrauterine fetal death, termination of pregnancy, neonatal death and structural abnormalities.

RESULTS

Of the 132 pregnancies, 13 had NT > 95th percentile, 89 had NT ≥3 mm and 30 had cystic hygroma. Among 13 pregnancies with NT > 95th centile, 7.6% had abnormal karyotype. Among 89 pregnancies with NT ≥3 mm, 29.2% had abnormal karyotype, 13.4% miscarriage, 7.8% underwent TOP, 5.6% intrauterine fetal death, 1.1% neonatal death and 14.6% had structural abnormalities. Among 30 pregnancies with cystic hygroma, 40% had abnormal karyotype, 20% miscarriage, 13.3% TOP, 13.3% intrauterine fetal death, 6.6% had neonatal death and 20% had structural abnormalities.

CONCLUSION

In our study, karyotype abnormalities increased with increasing nuchal translucency with highest risk in fetuses with cystic hygromas. Increased nuchal translucency was associated with adverse pregnancy outcome, which was higher in the group with NT≥6 mm and cystic hygromas.

Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Fetal malformations occur in 2-3% of pregnancies. They require invasive procedures for cytogenetics and molecular testing. "Structural anomalies" include non-transient anatomic alterations. "Soft markers" are often transient minor ultrasound findings. Anomalies not fitting these definitions are categorized as "dynamic". This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic yield and the rates of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) in fetuses undergoing molecular testing (chromosomal microarray (CMA), exome sequencing (ES), genome sequencing (WGS)) due to ultrasound findings. The CMA diagnostic yield was 2.15% in single soft markers (vs. 0.79% baseline risk), 3.44% in multiple soft markers, 3.66% in single structural anomalies and 8.57% in multiple structural anomalies. Rates for specific subcategories vary significantly. ES showed a diagnostic rate of 19.47%, reaching 27.47% in multiple structural anomalies. WGS data did not allow meta-analysis. In fetal structural anomalies, CMA is a first-tier test, but should be integrated with karyotype and parental segregations. In this class of fetuses, ES presents a very high incremental yield, with a significant VUSs burden, so we encourage its use in selected cases. Soft markers present heterogeneous CMA results from each other, some of them with risks comparable to structural anomalies, and would benefit from molecular analysis. The diagnostic rate of multiple soft markers poses a solid indication to CMA.

Reexamining the optimal nuchal translucency cutoff for diagnostic testing in the cell-free DNA and microarray era: results from the Victorian Perinatal Record Linkage study

BACKGROUND

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine recently recommended offering genetic counseling and diagnostic testing for enlarged nuchal translucency at ≥3.0 mm, regardless of previous negative screening with noninvasive prenatal testing.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to perform a population-based, individual record linkage study to determine the optimal definition of an enlarged nuchal translucency for the detection of atypical chromosome abnormalities.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective study of women resident in Victoria, Australia, undergoing combined first-trimester screening during the 24-month period from January 2015 to December 2016. Linkages between statewide results for combined first-trimester screening, prenatal diagnostic procedures, and postnatal cytogenetic results from products of conception and infants up to 12 months of age were used to ascertain the frequency and type of chromosome abnormality by gestation and nuchal translucency measurement. An atypical chromosome abnormality was defined as any major chromosome abnormality other than whole chromosome aneuploidy involving chromosomes 21, 18, 13, X, and Y.

RESULTS

Of the 81,244 singleton pregnancies undergoing combined first-trimester screening, 491 (0.60%) had a nuchal translucency of ≥3.5 mm, 534 (0.66%) had a nuchal translucency of 3.0 to 3.4 mm, and 80,219 (98.74%) had a nuchal translucency of < 3.0 mm. When grouped by nuchal translucency multiples of the median (MoM), 192 (0.24%) had a nuchal translucency of ≥3.0 MoM, 513 (0.63%) had a nuchal translucency of 1.9 to 2.9 MoM, and 80,539 (99.13%) had a nuchal translucency of <1.9 MoM. A total of 1779 pregnancies underwent prenatal or postnatal diagnostic testing, of which 89.60% were performed by whole-genome single-nucleotide polymorphism chromosomal microarray. The frequency of total major chromosome abnormalities was significantly higher in the group with a nuchal translucency of ≥3.5 mm (147 of 491, 29.94%) than the group with a nuchal translucency of 3.0 to 3.4 mm (21 of 534, 3.93%) or a nuchal translucency of <3.0 mm (71 of 80,219, 0.09%) (P<.001). There were 93 atypical chromosome abnormalities in the total screened cohort. The frequency of an atypical chromosome abnormality was 4.07% (95% confidence interval, 2.51-6.22), 0.37% (95% confidence interval, 0.05-1.35), and 0.09% (95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.11) in the groups with a nuchal translucency of ≥3.5 mm, 3.0 to 3.4 mm, and <3.0 mm, respectively. The frequency of atypical chromosome abnormalities was 4.69% (95% confidence interval, 2.17-8.71), 2.53% (95% confidence interval, 1.36-4.29), and 0.09% (95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.11) in the groups with a nuchal translucency of ≥3.0 MoM, 1.9 to 2.9 MoM, and <1.9 MoM, respectively. When defining thresholds for offering diagnosis with chromosomal microarray at 11 to 13 weeks, both a nuchal translucency threshold of 1.9 MoM and a fixed threshold of 3.0 mm captured 22 of 93 fetuses (23.7%) with an atypical chromosome abnormality. Of these, 50.0% had a coexisting fetal abnormality on ultrasound. However, the gestation-specific threshold of 1.9 MoM had a better specificity than 3.0 mm. The positive predictive value of an enlarged nuchal translucency for any atypical chromosome abnormality was 1 in 47 for nuchal translucency of >3.0 mm and 1 in 32 for nuchal translucency of >1.9 MoM. Our nuchal translucency threshold of 1.9 MoM captured 0.87% of fetuses, thus approximating the 99th centile.

CONCLUSION

A gestational age-adjusted nuchal translucency threshold of 1.9 MoM or 99th centile is superior to the fixed cutoff of 3.0 mm for the identification of atypical chromosome abnormalities. The risk of an atypical chromosome abnormality in a fetus with an enlarged nuchal translucency is more than tripled in the presence of an additional ultrasound abnormality.

Application of expanded noninvasive prenatal test in prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with increased nuchal translucency

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficiency of the upgraded noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT-Plus) in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency (NT).

METHODS

Fetuses with an increased NT at or above 2.5 mm were selected for prenatal diagnosis. Amniotic fluid was collected from all cases for karyotype analysis and copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq), and cell-free fetal DNA (cfDNA) in maternal blood was tested using Noninvasive Prenatal Test (NIPT-Plus) before amniocentesis in some cases. The results of amniocentesis with different NT thicknesses were analyzed and compared with those of NIPT-Plus.

RESULTS

A total of 125 eligible patients were divided into group A (2.5 mm ≤ NT < 3.0 mm) and group B (NT ≥ 3.0 mm). In group A, the detection rate of chromosomal aneuploidy and pathogenic copy number variation (CNV) was 10.6% and 6.4%, respectively. The total chromosome abnormality rate in group B (34.7%) was significantly higher than that in group A (17%). In 72 patients who underwent NIPT-Plus and amniocentesis, chromosomal aneuploidy accounted for 80.8% of the total chromosomal abnormalities. Among 21 cases of chromosomal aneuploidy, NIPT-Plus detected 20 cases. The sensitivity and specificity of NIPT-Plus toward aneuploidy detection were 95.2% and 100%, respectively. Among the five cases of pathogenic CNV, only two were detected using NIPT-Plus.

CONCLUSION

NIPT-plus is recommended as the first choice for fetal diagnosis in pregnant women with 2.5 mm ≤ NT < 3.0 mm who do not accept invasive prenatal diagnosis. When NT ≥ 3.0 mm and NIPT-Plus detects chromosomal aneuploidy, a rapid prenatal diagnosis can be performed through amniocentesis. In cases where NIPT-Plus yields negative results, amniocentesis still needs to be performed to detect chromosome microdeletions/duplications in order to avoid a missed diagnosis.

The yield of chromosomal microarray in pregnancies with congenital cardiac defects and normal noninvasive prenatal screening

BACKGROUND

Evidence comparing the yield of chromosomal microarray analysis to noninvasive prenatal screening in pregnancies with congenital heart anomalies is currently limited.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the residual risk of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results in fetuses with congenital heart defects by its various subtypes following a normal noninvasive prenatal screening.

STUDY DESIGN

Using a population-based, countrywide computerized database, we retrieved the reports of all pregnancies undergoing chromosomal microarray analysis because of congenital heart defects through the years 2013-2019. We examined the risk of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) chromosomal microarray analysis results and compared it with the results of a local cohort of low-risk pregnancies. Of 5541 fetuses, 78 (1.4%) showed abnormal results. The residual risk of abnormal chromosomal microarray analysis results was calculated using several options-trisomies 21, 18, and 13; sex chromosome aneuploidies; 22q11.2 deletion, and deletions and duplications of at least 10 MB in size (genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening)-following the exclusion of theoretically detectable noninvasive prenatal screening anomalies.

RESULTS

Of the 1728 fetuses with congenital heart defects, 93 (5.4%) showed clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results (relative risk, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-3.1). The result of pregnancies with fetuses with congenital heart defects was compared with the results of the control population. Unique variants were found in 15 pregnancies (16.1%). The detection rate of noninvasive prenatal screening in isolated congenital heart defects varied from 1.0% (aimed at 3 common trisomies) to 2.2% (aimed at 5 common aneuploidies and 22q11.2 deletion) using noninvasive prenatal screening. In nonisolated congenital heart defects, the noninvasive prenatal screening detection rates ranged from 7.8% (aimed at common autosomal trisomies) to 9.2% using genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening. The residual risk of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results following normal noninvasive prenatal screening ranged from 2.0% to 2.8% in isolated congenital heart defects and 4.5% to 5.9% in nonisolated cases and was significantly higher than those of the control cohort in all noninvasive prenatal screening options. In addition, the residual risk following noninvasive prenatal screening aimed at chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y was significantly higher than those of the control cohort for most specific congenital heart defect subtypes, except for ventricular septal defects and aberrant right subclavian artery.

CONCLUSION

The residual risk of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results in pregnancies with fetuses with congenital heart defects following normal noninvasive prenatal screening was higher than those in pregnancies with normal ultrasound in most isolated and nonisolated congenital heart defect subtypes. This information should be taken into account by obstetricians and genetic counselors when considering the option of diagnostic testing.

Increased nuchal translucency after low-risk noninvasive prenatal testing: What should we tell prospective parents?

Three decades ago, the observation that first trimester fetuses with excess fluid accumulation at the back of the neck were more likely to be aneuploid, gave rise to a new era of prenatal screening. The nuchal translucency (NT) measurement in combination with serum biomarkers and maternal age, resulted in the first trimester combined screening (FTCS) program. The introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) over the past decade has introduced the option for parents to receive highly sensitive and specific screening information for common trisomy from as early as 10 weeks gestation, altering the traditional pathway FTCS pathway. The retention of the 11-13-week NT ultrasound remains important in the detection of structural anomalies; however, the optimal management of pregnancies with a low-risk NIPT result and an isolated increased NT measurement in an era of advanced genomic testing options is a new dilemma for clinicians. For parents, the prolonged period between the initial diagnosis in first trimester, and prognostic information at each successive stage of investigations up to 22-24 weeks, can be emotionally challenging. This article addresses the common questions from parents and clinicians as they navigate the uncertainty of having a fetus diagnosed with an increased NT after a low-risk NIPT result and presents suggested approaches to management.

Risk of Clinically Significant Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Findings in Fetuses With Nuchal Translucency From 3.0 mm Through 3.4 mm

OBJECTIVE

To examine the risk of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis findings in fetuses with nuchal translucency from 3.0-3.4 mm. In addition, we aimed to define the yield of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in such pregnancies.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included results of all chromosomal microarray analysis tests performed owing to a nuchal translucency measurement from 3.0-3.4 mm, without ultrasonographic anomalies, retrieved from the Israeli Ministry of Health computerized database. Rates of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) microarray findings were compared with a previously published local control population, encompassing 2,752 fetuses with normal ultrasound findings and nuchal translucency less than 3.0 mm.

RESULTS

Overall, 619 chromosomal microarray analyses were performed owing to isolated nuchal translucency from 3.0-3.4 mm. Of these, 29 (4.7%) cases had clinically significant copy number variants, a significantly higher risk compared with control-group pregnancies (relative risk 3.3, 95% CI 2.6-7.2). Divided by tenths of millimeters, the risk for abnormal chromosomal microarray analysis findings remained significantly increased, except for the subgroup of 198 fetuses with nuchal translucency measurements of 3.0 mm. Noninvasive prenatal testing for the five common chromosome aneuploidies would have missed 41.4% of the abnormal copy number variants-1.9% of overall cases, or 1 in 52 fetuses with nuchal translucency from 3-3.4 mm. Genome-wide NIPT, as well as traditional karyotyping, could have missed an abnormal finding in 9 of 619 (1.5%), or 1 in 69 fetuses.

CONCLUSION

Our outcomes show that the rate of abnormal chromosomal microarray analysis findings in fetuses with nuchal translucency from 3.1-3.4 mm is significantly higher compared with fetuses with normal ultrasound findings.

Nuchal translucency of 3.0-3.4 mm an indication for NIPT or microarray? Cohort analysis and literature review

Introduction

Currently fetal nuchal translucency (NT) ≥3.5 mm is an indication for invasive testing often followed by chromosomal microarray. The aim of this study was to assess the risks for chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with an NT 3.0‐3.4 mm, to determine whether invasive prenatal testing would be relevant in these cases and to assess the residual risks in fetuses with normal non‐invasive prenatal test (NIPT) results.

Material and methods

A retrospective study and meta‐analysis of literature cases with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm and 2 cohorts of pregnant women referred for invasive testing and chromosomal microarray was performed: Rotterdam region (with a risk >1:200 and NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm) tested in the period July 2012 to June 2019 and Central Denmark region (with a risk >1:300 and NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm) tested between September 2015 and December 2018.

Results

A total of 522 fetuses were referred for invasive testing and chromosomal microarray. Meta‐analysis indicated that in 1:7.4 (13.5% [95% CI 8.2%‐21.5%]) fetuses a chromosomal aberration was diagnosed. Of these aberrant cases, 47/68 (69%) involved trisomy 21, 18, and 13 and would potentially be detected by all NIPT approaches. The residual risk for missing a (sub)microscopic chromosome aberration depends on the NIPT approach and is highest if NIPT was performed only for common trisomies–1:21 (4.8% [95% CI 3.2%‐7.3%]). However, it may be substantially lowered if a genome‐wide 10‐Mb resolution NIPT test was offered (~1:464).

Conclusions

Based on these data, we suggest that the NT cut‐off for invasive testing could be 3.0 mm (instead of 3.5 mm) because of the high risk of 1:7.4 for a chromosomal aberration. If women were offered NIPT first, there would be a significant diagnostic delay because all abnormal NIPT results need to be confirmed by diagnostic testing. If the woman had already received a normal NIPT result, the residual risk of 1:21 to 1:464 for chromosome aberrations other than common trisomies, dependent on the NIPT approach, should be raised. If a pregnant woman declines invasive testing, but still wants a test with a broader coverage of clinically significant conditions then the genome‐wide >10‐Mb resolution NIPT test, which detects most aberrations, could be proposed.