Vaginal streptococcus B colonization is not associated with increased infectious morbidity in labor induction

Gestational diabetes as a risk factor for GBS maternal rectovaginal colonization: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Maternal rectovaginal colonization by group B Streptococcus (GBS) increases the risk of perinatal GBS disease that can lead to death or long-term neurological impairment. Factors that increase the risk of rectovaginal GBS carriage are incompletely understood resulting in missed opportunities for detecting GBS in risk-based clinical approaches. There is a lacking consensus on whether gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a risk factor for rectovaginal GBS. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to address current conflicting findings and determine whether GDM should be clinically considered as a risk factor for maternal GBS colonization.

METHODS

Peer-reviewed studies that provided GDM prevalence and documented GBS vaginal and/or rectal colonization in women with and without GDM were included in this analysis. From study inception to October 30, 2023, we identified 6,275 relevant studies from EMBASE and PUBMED of which 19 were eligible for inclusion. Eligible studies were analyzed and thoroughly assessed for risk of bias with a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale that interrogated representativeness and comparability of cohorts, quality of reporting for GDM and GBS status, and potential bias from other metabolic diseases. Results were synthesized using STATA 18 and analyzed using random-effects meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Studies encompassed 266,706 women from 10 different countries, with study periods spanning from 1981 to 2020. Meta-analysis revealed that gestational diabetes is associated with a 16% increased risk of rectovaginal GBS carriage (OR 1.16, CI 1.07-1.26, P = 0.003). We also performed subgroup analyses to assess independent effects of pregestational vs. gestational diabetes on risk of maternal GBS carriage. Pregestational diabetes (Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus) was also associated with an increased risk of 76% (pooled OR 1.76, CI 1.27-2.45, P = 0.0008).

CONCLUSIONS

This study achieved a consensus among previously discrepant observations and demonstrated that gestational diabetes and pregestational diabetes are significant risk factors for maternal rectovaginal carriage of GBS. Recognition of GDM as a risk factor during clinical decisions about GBS screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis may decrease the global burden of GBS on maternal-perinatal health.

Association between Group B Streptococcus and Clinical Chorioamnionitis by Gestational Week at Delivery-A Multicenter Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

 In the era of group B Streptococcus (GBS) screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), GBS colonization has been associated with a lower risk of chorioamnionitis, possibly due to a protective effect of IAP. We sought to confirm this finding and assess whether this association varies by gestational week at delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

 We performed a retrospective cohort study of term (37.0-42.6 weeks), singleton parturients with known GBS status who delivered from 2005 to 2021 at two academic medical centers in Israel. We excluded patients who underwent planned cesarean, out of hospital birth, or had a fetal demise. Patients received GBS screening and IAP for GBS positivity as routine clinical care. The primary outcome was a diagnosis of clinical chorioamnionitis as determined by the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision code, compared between GBS-positive and -negative groups, and assessed by gestational week at delivery.

RESULTS

 Of 292,126 deliveries, 155,255 met inclusion criteria. In total, 30.1% were GBS positive and 69.9% were negative. GBS-positive patients were 21% less likely to be diagnosed with clinical chorioamnionitis than GBS-negative patients, even after controlling for confounders (1.5 vs. 2.2%, adjusted odds ratio: 0.79, 95% confidence interval: 0.68-0.92). When assessed by gestational week at delivery, there was a significantly greater difference in rates of clinical chorioamnionitis between GBS-positive versus GBS-negative groups with advancing gestational age: 1.5-fold difference at 38 to 40 weeks, but a twofold difference at 42 weeks. The risk of clinical chorioamnionitis remained stable in the GBS-positive group, but increased significantly in the GBS-negative group at 41- and 42-week gestation (2.0 vs. 2.9%, p < 0.01 at 41 weeks; up to 3.9% at 42 weeks, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

 In a large multicenter cohort with universal GBS screening and IAP, GBS positivity was associated with a lower risk of chorioamnionitis, driven by an increasing rate of chorioamnionitis among GBS-negative patients after 40 weeks.

KEY POINTS

· GBS positivity and IAP may be associated with lower risk of chorioamnionitis.. · GBS-positive patients were less likely to be diagnosed with chorioamnionitis.. · This difference increased with advancing gestational age after 40 weeks..

Association between intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus colonization and clinical chorioamnionitis among patients undergoing induction of labor at term

BACKGROUND

Rectovaginal colonization with Group B Streptococcus during pregnancy has historically been shown to be associated with an increased risk of clinical chorioamnionitis and peripartum infectious morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

Newer observational data in the era of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis suggest a possible reversal of this association; however, it is unclear if this is related to differences in labor management for those with and without Group B Streptococcus colonization. We therefore sought to assess the association between intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus colonization and clinical chorioamnionitis within the context of a randomized induction of labor trial with a standardized labor protocol.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed an exploratory secondary analysis of a randomized trial of patients undergoing term induction at a tertiary care center. Patients received third trimester Group B Streptococcus screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis as routine care. Group B Streptococcus detection was performed using a carrot broth-enhanced subculture to Group B Streptococcus Detect approach (Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA). Labor management was protocolized per the trial. Patients with unknown Group B Streptococcus status or who did not receive intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, if indicated, were excluded. The primary outcome was diagnosis of clinical chorioamnionitis, compared between patients who received intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for known Group B Streptococcus positive status (by culture, history, or Group B Streptococcus bacteriuria) and those who were Group B Streptococcus negative and did not receive intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Secondary outcomes included postpartum endometritis, wound infection, a composite maternal peripartum infectious morbidity, and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 491 patients were enrolled in the trial. Of these, 466 had a known Group B Streptococcus status and received or did not receive intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis accordingly and were included in this analysis: 292 (62.7%) were Group B Streptococcus negative and did not receive intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, and 174 (37.3%) were Group B Streptococcus positive and received intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. The majority of patients were Non-Hispanic Black (78.1%) and nulliparous (59.7%). There were no differences in demographic, clinical, induction or labor characteristics between groups. Patients who were Group B Streptococcus positive had a 49% lower rate of clinical chorioamnionitis (8.1% vs 14.7%, odds ratio, 0.51; P=.03) and a lower rate of peripartum infectious morbidity (8.1% vs 15.8%, odds ratio, 0.47; P=.02) compared to those who were Group B Streptococcus negative. Infants born to patients who were Group B Streptococcus positive were significantly less likely to be admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (3.4% vs 15.1%, P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Although Group B Streptococcus colonization has historically been considered a risk factor for clinical chorioamnionitis, in the era of universal antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus positive patients, our findings support the point that intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus positivity is associated with lower rates of clinical chorioamnionitis and peripartum infectious morbidity among patients undergoing induction with protocolized labor management. These findings demonstrate that intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus may protect against perinatal infectious morbidity, a phenomenon that warrants further investigation.

Association between intracervical Foley balloon and clinical chorioamnionitis among patients with group B streptococcus colonization undergoing induction with standardized labor management

BACKGROUND

Intracervical Foley balloons are commonly used for cervical ripening, but there has been a historical concern regarding an increased risk of clinical chorioamnionitis with Foley balloon use in patients with group B streptococcus.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether intracervical Foley balloon use in patients with group B streptococcus is associated with an increased risk of clinical chorioamnionitis.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial Mechanical and Pharmacologic Methods of Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial that compared cervical ripening agents within a standardized labor protocol. Foley balloon (alone, with oxytocin, or with misoprostol) was compared with misoprostol only to evaluate the primary outcome of clinical chorioamnionitis, defined based on the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines. Patients with a term, singleton pregnancy with intact membranes and an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score of ≤6 and dilation ≤2 cm) and a known group B streptococcus status were included. The secondary outcomes included a composite postpartum maternal infectious outcome consisting of any occurrence of endometritis, wound infection, postpartum urinary tract infection, or maternal sepsis; additional secondary outcomes included neonatal outcomes. Binomial regression with robust error variance was used to evaluate whether group B streptococcus status modified the relationship between Foley balloon use and clinical chorioamnionitis and to adjust for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 491 patients were enrolled in the original trial. Of these patients, 467 had a known group B streptococcus status and underwent cervical ripening: 182 (39.0%) had group B streptococcus, and 285 (61.0%) did not have group B streptococcus. Moreover, 73.0% of patients received a Foley balloon, and 27.0% of patients did not receive a Foley balloon. There was no difference in the demographic or clinical characteristics between groups. The overall rate of clinical chorioamnionitis was 12.2%, with no difference between those with and without a Foley balloon (12.6% vs 11.1%, respectively; P=.66). Group B streptococcus status did not modify the association between Foley balloon use and clinical chorioamnionitis (relative risk, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-1.72). This remained unchanged after adjusting for gestational age (adjusted relative risk, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-1.67). Furthermore, other maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

In this secondary analysis of a large randomized trial using a standardized labor protocol, there was no increased risk of infectious morbidity with Foley balloon use in patients overall and in patients with group B streptococcus. Our findings support that a Foley balloon can be safely used for cervical ripening in patients with group B streptococcus colonization.

Interspecies Interactions within the Host: the Social Network of Group B Streptococcus

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a pervasive neonatal pathogen accounting for a combined half a million deaths and stillbirths annually. The most common source of fetal or neonatal GBS exposure is the maternal microbiota. GBS asymptomatically colonizes the gastrointestinal and vaginal mucosa of 1 in 5 individuals globally, although its precise role in these niches is not well understood. To prevent vertical transmission, broad-spectrum antibiotics are administered to GBS-positive mothers during labor in many countries. Although antibiotics have significantly reduced GBS early-onset neonatal disease, there are several unintended consequences, including an altered neonatal microbiota and increased risk for other microbial infections. Additionally, the incidence of late-onset GBS neonatal disease remains unaffected and has sparked an emerging hypothesis that GBS-microbe interactions in developing neonatal gut microbiota may be directly involved in this disease process. This review summarizes our current understanding of GBS interactions with other resident microbes at the mucosal surface from multiple angles, including clinical association studies, agriculture and aquaculture observations, and experimental animal model systems. We also include a comprehensive review of in vitro findings of GBS interactions with other bacterial and fungal microbes, both commensal and pathogenic, along with newly established animal models of GBS vaginal colonization and in utero or neonatal infection. Finally, we provide a perspective on emerging areas of research and current strategies to design microbe-targeting prebiotic or probiotic therapeutic intervention strategies to prevent GBS disease in vulnerable populations.

Transplantation of maternal intestinal flora to the newborn after elective cesarean section (SECFLOR): study protocol for a double blinded randomized controlled trial

Background

A complication of elective cesarean section (CS) delivery is its interference with the normal intestinal colonization of the infant, affecting the immune and metabolic signaling in early life— a process that has been associated with long-term morbidity, such as allergy and diabetes. We evaluate, in CS-delivered infants, whether the normal intestinal microbiome and its early life development can be restored by immediate postnatal transfer of maternal fecal microbiota (FMT) to the newborn, and how this procedure influences the maturation of the immune system.

Methods

Sixty healthy mothers with planned elective CS are recruited and screened thoroughly for infections. A maternal fecal sample is taken prior to delivery and processed according to a transplantation protocol. After double blinded randomization, half of the newborns will receive a diluted aliquot of their own mother’s stool orally administered in breast milk during the first feeding while the other half will be similarly treated with a placebo. The infants are clinically followed, and fecal samples are gathered weekly until the age of 4 weeks, then at the ages of 8 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. The parents fill in questionnaires until the age of 24 months. Blood samples are taken at the age of 2–3 days and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months to assess development of major immune cell populations and plasma proteins throughout the first years of life.

Discussion

This is the first study to assess long-time effects on the intestinal microbiome and the development of immune system of a maternal fecal transplant given to term infants born by CS.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04173208, registration date 21.11.2019.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-022-03609-3.

Novel side by side Foley catheter balloons for 'extended labour induction': Concept, simulation study and clinical application

OBJECTIVE

To introduce the concept of extended or prolonged mechanical balloon labour induction as opposed to pharmacological methods and amniotomy after single balloon expulsion, by the novel use of side-by-side Foley catheter balloons. This method is of particular relevance when there is prior uterine surgery, fetal reserve is uncertain, the risk of vertical infection is high, or facilities for labour monitoring are limited.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted simulation studies to compare balloon circumferences and resistance to passage through a simulation cervix between different gauge, fluid distension volume and number of Foley catheters. We describe an illustrative clinical case.

RESULTS

In simulation studies we found modest increases in Foley catheter balloon circumference with increased catheter gauge and with increasing volume of distending fluid. We found that retention of Foley balloon(s) by a flexible simulated cervix was increased with the gauge, distending volume and number of balloons used side-by-side. We describe the case of a mother with pre-eclampsia with severe features and compromised fetal reserve in whom the side-by-side balloon method achieved spontaneous delivery after a single balloon had been expelled without labour commencing.

CONCLUSIONS

Institutional protocols for Balloon labour inductions should take into account the characteristics of locally-available balloon catheters. Further research is justified to determine the usefulness of extended mechanical labour induction with side-by-side balloon catheters, particularly with prior caesarean section, uncertain fetal reserve and settings with limited fetal monitoring capacity.

Towards an evidence-based approach to optimize the success of labour induction

Induction of labour is a two-step process involving cervical ripening and the initiation of uterine contractions, with the goal of achieving vaginal birth. To optimize the chance of a safe and timely vaginal birth, the process of induction of labour should be evidence based and individualized to the given person and situation. In this study, we lay out a framework for how this should be done, emphasizing on careful clinical assessment and planning, flexibility in the strategy of induction, patience during the ripening and latent phases of labour, and thoughtful consideration regarding changing the strategy if active labour is not initially achieved. The goal of this review is to present the current evidence on this topic in the form of a user-friendly protocol that can be easily adapted to institutional practice.