The effect of electrode placement and interphase interval on force production during stimulation of the dorsiflexor muscles

Pulse Shaping Strategies for Electroceuticals: A Comprehensive Survey of the Use of Interphase Gaps in Miniature Stimulation Systems

OBJECTIVE

Interphase gaps (IPGs) are among the most commonly suggested pulse shape variations to try to enhance neural stimulation efficiency by reducing the action potential (AP) suppressing effect of an early anodic hyperpolarization. The majority of published literature on the effect of IPGs is based on investigations of monopolar stimulation configurations. However, many contemporary neuromodulation applications including the emerging field of electroceutical devices operate in a bipolar electrode configuration.

METHODS

We investigated the effect of IPGs and asymmetric biphasic current controlled pulses with reduced anodic amplitude on neural activation in both principal electrode configurations in a rodent in-vivo nerve muscle preparation.

RESULTS

In the monopolar electrode configuration, our findings of 10.9 ± 1.5% decreased stimulation amplitude with 200 μs IPGs in biphasic pulses of 40 μs phase width are in agreement with published literature in this configuration. Surprisingly, using the bipolar configuration, opposite effects of IPGs were observed and neural activation required up to 18.6 ± 3.1% (phase width 100 μs, IPG = 1000 μs) higher amplitudes. Electroneurogram recordings of the stimulated nerve revealed temporal differences in AP generation between the monopolar and bipolar configuration. In the bipolar configuration excitation first occurred in response to the middle field transition of biphasic pulses.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to report consistently increased amplitude requirements with IPGs in bipolar stimulation configurations.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our findings must be taken into consideration when designing stimulation waveforms for neuromodulation devices that operate in a bipolar mode to avoid increased amplitude requirements that result in increased energy consumption.

Effects of interphase interval during neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the wrist extensors with maximally tolerated current intensity

Short interphase intervals (IPIs) within biphasic symmetrical pulses enhance maximal electrically induced isometric contractions (EIC). However, IPI effects have not been previously studied in muscles stimulated at the highest tolerated current intensity. Our aim was to examine IPI effects on the strength of EIC, degree of discomfort, and sensory and motor thresholds on the wrist extensor muscles. Eighteen subjects (mean age 25.5, SD ± 3.97 years) participated in a repeated-measures trial. Five parameter settings were used to stimulate the wrist extensors: monophasic pulses with phase durations (PD) 200 µs, and biphasic pulses with PDs either 200 or 500 µs, applied with/without an IPI of 200 µs duration. Order of settings was randomized, and current was set at the maximum intensity tolerated by each subject. IPIs applied at the maximally tolerated current intensity did not increase the strength of the EICs and did not reduce the degree of discomfort or the sensory and motor thresholds. These findings were not dependent on the PDs. Insertion of an IPI within the biphasic current during stimulation of the wrist muscle yielded no advantage in term of contraction strength or degree of discomfort. These results contradict previous studies indicating stronger contractions when an IPI is inserted during stimulation at a predetermined submaximal current intensity. As some of the clinical applications of neuromuscular electrical stimulation utilize the highest intensity tolerated by the individual, these findings are clinically relevant. Additional studies involving other muscle groups, electrode size and locations, and phase parameters are warranted.

The duty cycle in Functional Electrical Stimulation research. Part II: Duty cycle multiplicity and domain reporting

In part I of this review, we introduced the duty cycle as a fundamental parameter in controlling the effect of electrical stimulation pulse trains on muscle structural and functional properties with special emphasis on fatigue. Following on from a survey of the literature, we discuss here the relative ability of intermittent and continuous stimulation to fatigue muscle. In addition, pertinent literature is explored on a more deeper level, highlighting contentions regarding the duty cycle across studies. In response to literature inconsistencies, we propose frameworks upon which the duty cycle parameter may be specified. We present the idea of domain reporting for the duty cycle, and illustrate with practical examples. In addition we dig further into the literature and present a set of notations that have been used by different researchers to report the duty cycle. We also propose the idea of the duty cycle multiple, which together with domain reporting, will help researchers understand more precisely duty cycles of electrical stimulation. As a case study, we also show how the duty cycle has been looked at by researchers in the context of pressure sore attenuation in patients. Together with part I, it is hoped that the frameworks suggested provide a complete picture of how duty cycle has been discussed across the literature, and gives researchers a more trans-theoretical basis upon which they may report the duty cycle in their studies. This may also lead to a more precise specification of electrical stimulation protocols used in patients.