Citrate-Buffered Dialysis Solution (Citrasate) Allows Avoidance of Anticoagulation During Intermittent Hemodiafiltration-At the Cost of Decreased Performance and Systemic Biocompatibility

Comparison of citrate dialysate in pre- and post-dilution online hemodiafiltration: effect on clot formation and adequacy of dialysis in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Citrate dialysate (CD) has been successfully used in conventional hemodialysis and continuous renal replacement therapy; however, no study has compared pre- and post-dilution online hemodiafiltration (oL-HDF). Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of citrate anticoagulation for oL-HDF and the metabolic changes and quality of life of patients on hemodialysis treated using both modes.

METHOD

Eight dialysis patients were treated with CD containing 0.8 mmol of citric acid for 4 weeks in each phase. Visual clotting scores were investigated as the primary endpoints. Adequacy of dialysis, laboratory parameters, and quality of life were measured as secondary objectives.

RESULTS

The mean clotting scores in the pre-dilution mode were significantly lower than those in the post-dilution mode and in all phases except the heparin-free phase (p < 0.001 in the baseline phase, p = 0.001 in phase 1, and p = 0.023 in phase 2). The values of Kt/V in both modalities were comparable except during the baseline phase, in which the values of pre-dilution were significantly greater than post-dilution (2.36 ± 0.52/week vs. 1.87 ± 0.33/week;95% CI -0.81 to -0.19, p = 0.002). The patient's quality of life regarding their physical activity level was significantly higher in the post-dilution mode than in the pre-dilution mode at baseline and in phase 1 (p = 0.014 and 0.004 at baseline and in phase 1, respectively). Metabolic changes did not differ between the two modes.

CONCLUSION

Citrate dialysate decreased or prevented anticoagulation in both pre- and post-dilution modes of oL-HDF without significant side effects and had comparable adequacy of dialysis.

Switching from acetate to citrate dialysate in a central concentrate delivery system for high-volume online hemodiafiltration: a retrospective cohort study

Interest in citrate-based dialysate (Cit-D) is growing due to its benefits, including anticoagulation and dialysis efficacy. However, research on safety and efficiency of Cit-D in high-volume hemodiafiltration (HDF) via central concentrate delivery system (CCDS) is scarce. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of Cit-D when switching from acetate-based dialysate (Acet-D) in high-volume HDF via CCDS. This is a retrospective analysis of 28 patients who underwent post-dilution online HDF via CCDS, who switched from Acet-D to Cit-D. The study period was divided into 3 periods for analysis: 12 weeks using Acet-D (AD period), the first 12 weeks using Cit-D (CD-1 period), and the second 12 weeks using Cit-D (CD-2 period). We collected the laboratory, dialysis, and safety parameters in each period from electrical medical records. After switching from Acet-D to Cit-D, heparin dosage decreased by 17%, whereas the incidence of complications did not increase. Kt/VBUN and urea reduction ratio increased by 4.6% and 2.1%, respectively. Pre-dialysis beta2-microglobulin concentration decreased after using Cit-D. The corrected calcium levels decreased in the CD-1 period compared to the AD period, but in CD-2, they subsequently increased to levels similar to those observed during the AD period. Symptomatic hypocalcemia did not occur, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of hyperparathyroidism. Endotoxin levels and the bacterial culture of ultrapure dialysate were unremarkable throughout all periods. These results might suggest that Cit-D could potentially offer advantages over Acet-D, such as reducing the heparin dose and increasing dialysis efficiency, in patients undergoing high-volume HDF using CCDS.

Citric Acid-Containing Dialysate and Survival Rate in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study

Background

Metabolic acidosis is a common threat for patients on hemodialysis, managed by alkaline dialysate. The main base is bicarbonate, to which small amounts of acetic, citric, or hydrochloric acid are added. The first two are metabolized to bicarbonate, mostly by the liver. Citric acid-containing dialysate might improve dialysis efficiency, anticoagulation, calcification propensity score, and intradialytic hemodynamic stability. However, a recent report from the French dialysis registry suggested this dialysate increases mortality risk. This prompted us to assess whether citric acid-containing bicarbonate-based dialysate was associated with mortality in the international Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).

Methods

Detailed patient-based information on dialysate composition was collected in DOPPS phases 5 and 6 (2012-2017). Cox regression was used to model the association between baseline bicarbonate dialysate containing citric acid versus not containing citric acid and mortality among DOPPS countries and phases where citric acid-containing dialysate was used.

Results

Citric acid-containing dialysate was most commonly used in Japan, Italy, and Belgium (25%, 25%, 21% and of patients who were DOPPS phase 6, respectively) and used in <10% of patients in other countries. Among 11,306 patients in DOPPS country and phases with at least 15 patients using citric acid-containing dialysate, patient demographics, comorbidities, and laboratories were similar among patients using (14%) versus not using (86%) citric acid-containing dialysate. After accounting for case mix, we did not observe a directional association between citric acid-containing dialysate use (any versus none) and mortality (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.34), nor did we find evidence of a dose-dependent relationship when parameterizing the citric acid concentration in the dialysate as 1, 2, and 3+ mEq/L.

Conclusions

The use of citric acid-containing dialysate was not associated with greater risk of all-cause mortality in patients on hemodialysis participating in DOPPS. Clinical indications for the use of citric acid-containing dialysate deserve further investigation.

Impact of the dialysate acid component on haemodialysis mortality rates

BACKGROUND

No prospective study has evaluated the long-term effect on mortality of the new acid concentrates added to bicarbonate dialysate. The aim of this pharmacoepidemiological study was to evaluate the association between hydrochloric or citric acid-based dialysate and mortality on haemodialysis (HD).

METHODS

This study included 117 796 patients with 3 723 887 months on HD recorded in the national French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network registry. Dialysate acid components were retrospectively reconstructed for each facility. All patients on HD were associated each month with an exposure based on that at their facility of treatment. We took each patient's time-varying exposure into account to calculate the monthly mortality rates for each exposure. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for mortality were calculated with a Poisson regression, with acetic acid as the reference. Regressions were adjusted for initial clinical characteristics (age, gender, previous cardiovascular events, active malignancy, diabetes, pulmonary disease, mobility), dialysis technique and location (in-centre, outpatient centre, self-care unit) and ESRD vintage, updated monthly.

RESULTS

The crude mortality rate per 1000 patient-months with citric acid {11.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.1-12.0]} was lower than with either acetic acid [12.9 (95% CI 12.8-13.1)] or hydrochloric acid [12.8 (95% CI 12.2-13.5)]. For the 2014-17 period, the IRR for mortality with citric acid [adjusted IRR 0.94 (95% CI 0.90-0.99)] and with hydrochloric acid [adjusted IRR 0.86 (95% CI 0.79-0.94)] were significantly lower than with acetic acid.

CONCLUSION

This post-marketing study of long-term exposure to dialysate acidifiers at the patient level found the use of citric and hydrochloric acid-based dialysates, compared with acetic acid, was associated with lower mortality.

Strategies for asymmetrical triacetate dialyser heparin-free effective haemodialysis: the SAFE study

Background

In haemodialysis, maintaining patency of the extracorporeal circuit requires the use of anticoagulants. Although (low molecular weight) heparins are the mainstay, these are not well tolerated in all patients. Alternative approaches include saline infusion, citrate-containing dialysate, regional citrate anticoagulation or the use of heparin-coated membranes. Asymmetric cellulose triacetate (ATA) dialysers have a low degree of platelet contact activation and might be an alternative to heparin-coated dialysers. The aim of this study was to test the clotting propensity of ATA when used without systemic anticoagulation.

Methods

We performed a Phase II pilot study in maintenance dialysis patients. The ‘Strategies for Asymmetrical Triacetate dialyzer heparin-Free Effective hemodialysis’ (SAFE) study was a two-arm open-label crossover study. In Arm A, patients were dialysed using 1.9 m² ATA membranes in combination with a citrate-containing dialysate (1 mM). In Arm B, the ATA membrane was combined with high-volume predilution haemodiafiltration (HDF) without any other anticoagulation. The primary endpoint was the success rate to complete 4 h of haemodialysis without preterm clotting. Secondary endpoints included time to clotting and measures of dialysis adequacy.

Results

We scheduled 240 dialysis sessions (120/arm) in 20 patients. Patients were randomized 1:1 to start with Arm A or B. All patients crossed to the other arm halfway through the study. A total of 232 (96.7%) study treatments were delivered. Overall, 23 clotting events occurred, 7 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B. The success rate in Arm A (ATA + citrate-containing dialysate) was 90.8/94.0% [intention to treat (ITT)/as treated]. The success rate in Arm B (ATA + predilution HDF) was 83.3/86.2% (ITT/as treated). Time to clotting was borderline significantly better in Arm A (Mantel-Cox log rank P = 0.05).

Conclusion

ATA dialysers have a low clotting propensity and both predilution HDF and a citrate-containing dialysate resulted in high rates of completed dialysis sessions.

Acetate-free, citrate-acidified bicarbonate dialysis improves serum calcification propensity-a preliminary study

Background

A novel in vitro test (T50 test) assesses ex vivo serum calcification propensity and predicts mortality in chronic kidney disease and haemodialysis (HD) patients. For the latter, a time-dependent decline of T50 was shown to relate to mortality. Here we assessed whether a 3-month switch to acetate-free, citrate-acidified, standard bicarbonate HD (CiaHD) sustainably improves calcification propensity.

Methods

T50 values were assessed in paired midweek pre-dialysis sera collected before and 3 months after CiaHD in 78 prevalent European HD patients. In all, 44 were then switched back to acetate. Partial correlation was used to study associations of changing T50 and changing covariates. Linear mixed effect models were built to assess the association of CiaHD and covariates with changing T50.

Results

A significant intra-individual increase of serum calcification resilience was found after 3 months on CiaHD (206  ±  56 to 242  ±  56 min; P < 0.001), but not after switching back to acetate (252  ±  63 to 243  ±  64 min; n = 44; P = 0.29). CiaHD, Δ serum phosphate and Δ albumin but not Δ ionized calcium and magnesium were the strongest determinants of changing T50. Beneath T50, only serum albumin but not phosphate changed significantly during 3 months of CiaHD.

Conclusion

CiaHD dialysis favourably affected calcification propensity as measured by the T50 test. Whether this treatment, beyond established phosphate-directed treatments, has the potential to sustainably tip the balance towards a more anti-calcific serum milieu needs to be further investigated.

Artificial Organs 2017: A Year in Review

In this Editor's Review, articles published in 2017 are organized by category and summarized. We provide a brief reflection of the research and progress in artificial organs intended to advance and better human life while providing insight for continued application of these technologies and methods. Artificial Organs continues in the original mission of its founders "to foster communications in the field of artificial organs on an international level." Artificial Organs continues to publish developments and clinical applications of artificial organ technologies in this broad and expanding field of organ Replacement, Recovery, and Regeneration from all over the world. Peer-reviewed Special Issues this year included contributions from the 12th International Conference on Pediatric Mechanical Circulatory Support Systems and Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Perfusion edited by Dr. Akif Undar, Artificial Oxygen Carriers edited by Drs. Akira Kawaguchi and Jan Simoni, the 24th Congress of the International Society for Mechanical Circulatory Support edited by Dr. Toru Masuzawa, Challenges in the Field of Biomedical Devices: A Multidisciplinary Perspective edited by Dr. Vincenzo Piemonte and colleagues and Functional Electrical Stimulation edited by Dr. Winfried Mayr and colleagues. We take this time also to express our gratitude to our authors for offering their work to this journal. We offer our very special thanks to our reviewers who give so generously of time and expertise to review, critique, and especially provide meaningful suggestions to the author's work whether eventually accepted or rejected. Without these excellent and dedicated reviewers the quality expected from such a journal could not be possible. We also express our special thanks to our Publisher, John Wiley & Sons for their expert attention and support in the production and marketing of Artificial Organs. We look forward to reporting further advances in the coming years.