Use of a Mechanical Circulatory Support Simulation to Study Pump Interactions With the Variable Hemodynamic Environment

Evaluation of Centrifugal Blood Pump Performances for Biventricular Support in Virtual Simulation Model

BACKGROUND

Despite the advances in the left ventricular assist device (LVAD), there are still situations that require a biventricular assist device (BVAD) system. The purpose of this study was to explore and compare the system performance interactions with the HeartMate3 (HM3) and HeartWare (HVAD) in a BVAD configuration using the virtual mock loop (VML) simulation tool.

METHODS

The VML simulation tool is an in silico implementation of a lumped parameter model of the cardiovascular system with mechanical circulatory support. Patients with ejection fractions of 60%, 20%, and 15% were simulated in VML, and the HVAD and HM3 in a BVAD with ventricular cannulation were applied to simulated conditions. Pump speeds that restored baseline normal hemodynamics were determined. To determine the optimal speeds for BVAD, the left and right arterial pressures (LAP, RAP) were plotted.

RESULTS

In the HVAD, LAP and RAP balanced at 11 mm Hg with LVAD 3,500 rpm, right ventricular assist device (RVAD) 2,200 rpm; at 13 mm Hg with LVAD 3,000 rpm, RVAD 1,700 rpm; and at 14 mm Hg with LVAD 2,500 rpm, RVAD 1,300 rpm. For the HM3, at 8 mm Hg with LVAD 7,000 rpm, RVAD 5,000 rpm; at 9 mm Hg with LVAD 6,000 rpm, RVAD 4,300 rpm; and at 9.5 mm Hg with LVAD 5,000 rpm, RVAD 3,500 rpm.

CONCLUSION

The RVAD/LVAD speed ratios required for atrial balance were approximately 0.6 for the HVAD and 0.7 for the HM3. However, the HVAD required RVAD speeds below its range of operation.

Modeling of Virtual Mechanical Circulatory Hemodynamics for Biventricular Heart Failure Support

OBJECTIVE

In this study, a mechanical circulatory support simulation tool was used to investigate the application of a unique device with two centrifugal pumps and one motor for the biventricular assist device (BVAD) support application. Several conditions-including a range of combined left and right systolic heart failure severities, aortic and pulmonary valve regurgitation, and combinations of high and low systemic and pulmonary vascular resistances-were considered in the simulation matrix. Relative advantages and limitations of using the device in BVAD applications are discussed.

METHODS

The simulated BVAD pump was based on the Cleveland Clinic pediatric continuous-flow total artificial heart (P-CFTAH), which is currently under development. Different combined disease states (n = 10) were evaluated to model the interaction with the BVAD, considering combinations of normal heart, moderate failure and severe systolic failure of the left and right ventricles, regurgitation of the aortic and pulmonary valves and combinations of vascular resistance. The virtual mock loop simulation tool (MATLAB; MathWorks®, Natick, MA) simulates the hemodynamics at the pump ports using a lumped-parameter model for systemic/pulmonary circulation characteristic inputs (values for impedance, systolic and diastolic ventricular compliance, beat rate, and blood volume), and characteristics of the cardiac chambers and valves.

RESULTS

Simulation results showed that this single-pump BVAD can provide regulated support of up to 5 L/min over a range of combined heart failure states and is suitable for smaller adult and pediatric support. However, good self-regulation of the atrial pressure difference was not maintained with the introduction of aortic valve regurgitation or high systemic vascular resistance when combined with low pulmonary vascular resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

This initial in silico study demonstrated that use of the P-CFTAH as a BVAD supports cardiac output and arterial pressure in biventricular heart failure conditions. A similar but larger device would be required for a large adult patient who needs more than 5 L/min of support.

A simulation tool for mechanical circulatory support device interaction with diseased states

We have created a simulation model to investigate the interactions between a variety of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices and the circulatory system with various simulated patient conditions and disease states. The present simulation accommodates a family of continuous-flow MCS devices under various stages of consideration or development at our institution. This article describes the mathematical core of the in silico simulation system and shows examples of simulation output imitating various disease states and of selected in vitro and clinical data from the literature.

Analysis of Cleveland Clinic continuous-flow total artificial heart performance using the Virtual Mock Loop: Comparison with an in vivo study

The Virtual Mock Loop (VML) is a mathematical model designed to simulate mechanism of the human cardiovascular system interacting with mechanical circulatory support devices. Here, we aimed to mimic the hemodynamic performance of Cleveland Clinic's self-regulating continuous-flow total artificial heart (CFTAH) via VML and evaluate the accuracy of the VML compared with an in vivo acute animal study. The VML reproduced 124 hemodynamic conditions from three acute in vivo experiments in calves. Systemic/pulmonary vascular resistances, pump rotational speed, pulsatility, and pulse rate were set for the VML from in vivo data. We compared outputs (pump flow, left and right pump pressure rises, and atrial pressure difference) between the two systems. The pump performance curves all fell in the designed range. There was a strong correlation between the VML and the in vivo study in the left pump flow (r2 = 0.84) and pressure rise (r2 = 0.80), and a moderate correlation in right pressure rise (r2 = 0.52) and atrial pressure difference (r2 = 0.59). Although there is room for improvement in simulating right-sided pump performance of self-regulating CFTAH, the VML acceptably simulated the hemodynamics observed in an in vivo study. These results indicate that pump flow and pressure rise can be estimated from vascular resistances and pump settings.

Use of a Virtual Mock Loop model to evaluate a new left ventricular assist device for transapical insertion

We are developing a novel type of miniaturized left ventricular assist device that is configured for transapical insertion. The aim of this study was to assess the performance and function of a new pump by using a Virtual Mock Loop system for device characterization and mapping. The results, such as pressure-flow performance curves, from pump testing in a physical mock circulatory loop were used to analyze its function as a left ventricular assist device. The Virtual Mock Loop system was programmed to mimic the normal heart condition, systolic heart failure, diastolic heart failure, and both systolic and diastolic heart failure, and to provide hemodynamic pressure values before and after the activation of several left ventricular assist device pump speeds (12,000, 14,000, and 16,000 r/min). With pump support, systemic flow and mean aortic pressure increased, and mean left atrial pressure and pulmonary artery pressure decreased for all heart conditions. Regarding high pump-speed support, the systemic flow, aortic pressure, left atrial pressure, and pulmonary artery pressure returned to the level of the normal heart condition. Based on the test results from the Virtual Mock Loop system, the new left ventricular assist device for transapical insertion may be able to ease the symptoms of patients with various types of heart failure. The Virtual Mock Loop system could be helpful to assess pump performance before in vitro bench testing.

Study on in vitro performance verification protocol for left ventricular assist device

OBJECTIVE

In vitro performance verification of ventricular assist devices using a mock circulatory loop is a prominent step to guarantee the system responses and the device performance and safety before the in vivo tests and ultimately clinical trials.

METHODS

In this article, we performed a comprehensive literature research to establish a verification matrix consisting of 12 test cases, defined by a set of physiological parameters which are commonly used to characterize a physiological condition. The clinical hemodynamic indicators for defining successful mechanical support were used as the acceptance criteria. A mock circulatory loop was customized to simulate the test cases, and a full verification protocol was described in details. An example left ventricular assist device was incorporated in the loop to accomplish a standard ventricular assist device performance verification.

RESULT

The test cases based on clinical data with sufficient safety margin represent our understanding in defining the extremes of operation. The mock circulatory loop was capable of generating the test conditions in the verification matrix and reproducing the Frank-Starling law of the native heart. The effect of the left ventricular assist device assistance (characterized by the total systemic flow, mean aortic pressure, and left atrial pressure) was well verified by the proposed protocol and acceptance criteria.

CONCLUSION

To date, all left ventricular assist devices made in China have been evaluated according this protocol and some of them have entered the clinical trial stage. We are closely observing the clinical data in order to further improve the performance of the platform and encourage more advances in mechanical circulatory assist devices.

Artificial Organs 2018: A Year in Review

In this Editor's Review, articles published in 2018 are organized by category and summarized. We provide a brief reflection of the research and progress in artificial organs intended to advance and better human life while providing insight for continued application of these technologies and methods. Artificial Organs continues in the original mission of its founders "to foster communications in the field of artificial organs on an international level." Artificial Organs continues to publish developments and clinical applications of artificial organ technologies in this broad and expanding field of organ Replacement, Recovery, and Regeneration from all over the world. Peer-reviewed special issues this year included contributions from the 13th International Conference on Pediatric Mechanical Circulatory Support Systems and Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Perfusion edited by Dr. Akif Undar, and the 25th Congress of the International Society for Mechanical Circulatory Support edited by Dr. Marvin Slepian. Additionally, many editorials highlighted the worldwide survival differences in hemodialysis and perspectives on mechanical circulatory support and stem cell therapies for cardiac support. We take this time also to express our gratitude to our authors for offering their work to this journal. We offer our very special thanks to our reviewers who give so generously of time and expertise to review, critique, and especially provide meaningful suggestions to the author's work whether eventually accepted or rejected. Without these excellent and dedicated reviewers the quality expected from such a journal could not be possible. We also express our special thanks to our Publisher, John Wiley & Sons for their expert attention and support in the production and marketing of Artificial Organs. We look forward to reporting further advances in the coming years.