Characteristics and outcomes of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with continuous‐flow left ventricular assist devices: A systematic review

An ISHLT consensus statement on strategies to prevent and manage hemocompatibility related adverse events in patients with a durable, continuous-flow ventricular assist device

Life expectancy of patients with a durable, continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) continues to increase. Despite significant improvements in the delivery of care for patients with these devices, hemocompatability-related adverse events (HRAEs) are still a concern and contribute to significant morbility and mortality when they occur. As such, dissemination of current best evidence and practices is of critical importance. This ISHLT Consensus Statement is a summative assessment of the current literature on prevention and management of HRAEs through optimal management of oral anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications, parenteral anticoagulant medications, management of patients at high risk for HRAEs and those experiencing thrombotic or bleeding events, and device management outside of antithrombotic medications. This document is intended to assist clinicians caring for patients with a CF-LVAD provide the best care possible with respect to prevention and management of these events.

Inhibition of angiogenesis in the management of refractory gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with LVAD support

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) is often related to GI angiodysplasia (GIAD). We previously reported data on VEGF inhibition with IV bevacizumab in the treatment of LVAD-associated GIAD bleeding, and now present follow-up data on patients treated with IV bevacizumab and/or low-dose oral pazopanib.

METHODS

All consecutive adult patients with LVAD-associated GIB from GIAD treated with bevacizumab or pazopanib, from July 20, 2017 to June 22, 2022, were included in the analysis. Data on hospitalizations, GI endoscopic procedures, and blood transfusions were obtained from first admission for GIB up to a median of 35.7 months following treatment initiation (range 1.3-59.8 months).

RESULTS

Eleven patients (91% male, mean 69.5 ± 8.9 years) were included. Eight patients (73%) received IV bevacizumab, two patients (18%) received oral pazopanib, and one patient (9%) received bevacizumab followed by pazopanib therapy. We observed a significantly decreased number of annualized hospitalizations for GIB (median difference - 2.87, p = 0.002), blood transfusions (median difference - 20.9, p = 0.01), and endoscopies (median difference - 6.95, p = 0.007) in patients pre- and post-anti-angiogenic therapy (bevacizumab and/or pazopanib). Similarly, a significant improvement in these clinical outcomes was noted in the bevacizumab group with decreased annualized hospitalizations (median difference - 2.75, p = 0.014), blood transfusions (median difference - 24.5, p = 0.047), and number of endoscopies (median differences -6.88, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Anti-angiogenic therapy with IV bevacizumab and/or low-dose oral pazopanib appears to provide benefits in patients with LVAD-associated GIB with reduced hospitalizations, blood transfusions, and need for GI endoscopic procedures.

Outcomes and Complications after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

BACKGROUND

Heart transplantation is the treatment of choice for selected patients with end-stage heart failure. Persistent donor organ shortage causes a growing demand for mechanical circulatory support not only as a bridge to transplantation but mainly as a destination therapy (DT).

METHODS

The aim of the study was to analyze the indications, comorbidities, and complications during the follow-up of all patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation with at least 12 months of follow-up time in one of the most experienced clinics in Poland between 2015 and 2023.

RESULTS

There were 125 individuals with LVAD implantation, from which 90 had full 12 months of follow-up (85 males - 94%, 5 females - 6%), with a median age of 58 (50.25-63.75) years. The median body mass index was 27.12 (25.27-29.68). The etiology of heart failure was ischemic (n = 44, 49%), dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 44, 49%), and others. Preoperative echocardiography revealed a mean LV ejection fraction of 13.8% and a median LV dimension of 7.55 (6.92-8.2) cm. In 61 patients (68%), imaging confirmed pulmonary hypertension. Thirty-four patients (38%) had diabetes and 16 (18%) were active smokers. Median follow-up was 30 (17.25-42) months, with the longest period being about 82 months. 40 (44%) patients had kidney failure before LVAD implantation, and in 43 cases (48%), we observed relevant, transient deterioration of kidney function. Almost all patients (n = 82, 91%) suffered from anemia (Hb <13 g/dL in males and <12 g/dL in females) in different periods after LVAD implantation due to perioperative bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding or unknown causes. The lowest Hb level was observed in the first week after LVAD implantation in 53 cases (58%). Median red cell concentrate transfusion demand before the discharge after surgery was 6 (2-8, 5) units.

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate selection of candidates and timing of LVAD implantation are critical for improved outcomes of DT. Anemia and kidney failure are the most frequent follow-up complications. Improved results and increased applicability and durability of LVADs have established this treatment option as an excellent alternative for patients with end-stage heart failure.

Vascular Function in Continuous Flow LVADs: Implications for Clinical Practice

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been increasingly used in patients with advanced heart failure, either as a destination therapy or as a bridge to heart transplant. Continuous flow (CF) LVADs have revolutionized advanced heart failure treatment. However, significant vascular pathology and complications have been linked to their use. While the newer CF-LVAD generations have led to a reduction in some vascular complications such as stroke, no major improvement was noticed in the rate of other vascular complications such as gastrointestinal bleeding. This review attempts to provide a comprehensive summary of the effects of CF-LVAD on vasculature, including pathophysiology, clinical implications, and future directions.

Gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: A comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal bleeding is a major cause of morbidity that plagues the quality of life of patients supported on contemporary continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs). Despite benefits in survival and the nearly 50% reduction in complications provided by CF-LVADs, bleeding remains one of the most frequent adverse events with CF-LVAD implants. The CF-LVADs cause an increased risk of bleeding mainly due to the activation of the coagulation cascade.

METHODS

A literature search was done using PubMed and Google Scholar from Inception to February 2022. Qualitative analyses of the articles retrieved were used to construct this review. This review attempts to provide a comprehensive summary of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk stratification, and management of gastrointestinal bleeding as a complication of CF-LVAD as well as propose an algorithm for diagnosis and treatment.

RESULTS

Bleeding can occur at different sites in the gastrointestinal tract, the most common underlying pathology being arteriovenous malformations located in the upper gastrointestinal tract The increased prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in CF-LVAD patients has been attributed to the physiology of the LVAD itself, the use of anticoagulants, as well as patient comorbidities. Management involves pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

CF-LVAD-supported patients have a significant risk of GI bleeding that is mainly caused by arteriovenous malformations located in the upper GI tract. The increased prevalence of GI bleeding in CF-LVAD patients is attributed to several etiologies that include factors attributed to the device itself and extrinsic factors such as the use of anticoagulation.

Bioprosthetic Total Artificial Heart Implantation Does Not Induce Chronic Inflammation

The Aeson total artificial heart (A-TAH) has been developed for patients at risk of death from biventricular failure. We aimed to assess the inflammatory status in nine subjects implanted with the A-TAH in kinetics over one year. Laboratory assessment of leukocyte counts, inflammatory cytokines assay, and peripheral blood mononuclear cell collection before and after A-TAH implantation. Leukocyte counts were not significantly modulated according to time after A-TAH implantation (coefficient of the linear mixed effect model with 95% CI, -0.05 (-0.71 to -0.61); p = 0.44). We explored inflammatory cytokine after A-TAH and did not observe, at any time, a modified profile compared to pre-implantation values (all p -values > 0.05). Finally, we compared the distribution of circulating immune cell subpopulations identified based on sequential expression patterns for multiple clusters of differentiation. None of the population explored had significant modulation during the 12-month follow-up (all p -values > 0.05). In conclusion, using a cytokine multiplex assay combined with a flow cytometry approach, we demonstrated the absence of inflammatory signals in peripheral blood over a period of 12 months following A-TAH implantation.

Established Clinical Prediction Rules for Bleeding had Mediocre Discrimination in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients

Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) reduce mortality in patients with end-stage heart failure, but LVAD management is frequently complicated by bleeding. Bleeding prediction post-LVAD implantation is challenging as prediction rules for hemorrhage have not been rigorously studied in this population. We aimed to validate clinical prediction rules for bleeding, derived in the atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism populations, in an LVAD cohort. This was a retrospective cohort study of LVAD recipients at an academic center. The primary end-point was time to gastrointestinal bleed or intracranial hemorrhage after implant; the secondary end-point was time to any major hemorrhage after hospital discharge. Four hundred and eighteen patients received an LVAD (135 HeartMate II, 125 HeartMate 3, 158 HVAD) between November 2009 and January 2019. The primary end-point occurred in 169 (40.4%) patients with C-statistics ranging 0.55-0.58 (standard deviation [SD] 0.02 for all models). The secondary end-point occurred in 167 (40.0%) patients with C-statistics ranging 0.53-0.58 (SD 0.02 for all models). Modifying the age and liver function thresholds increased the C-statistic range to 0.56-0.60 for the primary and secondary end-points. In a sensitivity analysis of HeartMate 3 patients, prediction rules performed similarly. Existing prediction rules for major bleeding had mediocre discrimination in an LVAD cohort.

Impact of digoxin utilization on clinical outcomes following left ventricular assist device implantation

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to assess the impact of digoxin use following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Patients implanted with continuous flow LVADs at a single academic medical center and survived to initial hospital discharge were included in the analysis (n = 346). Clinical events were captured at a maximum of 2 years of follow up. Digoxin use was defined as 30-day continuous use post-LVAD. Negative binomial regression and Kaplan-Meier method were used to assess the association between digoxin use and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Mean age of the cohort was 56 years (±13) and 23% (79/346) were female sex. Digoxin was used in 144 patients (41.6%) for a median of 268 days (IQR 154, 616). Digoxin use was associated with a significant reduction in cumulative incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) (15% vs 26%, p = 0.004). After adjusting for age, hypertension, post-operative hemoglobin, RDW, potassium, and GFR, and use of angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor, there remained a significant 47% reduction in GIB incidence in patients treated with digoxin. There was no significant difference in cumulative incidence in right ventricular failure (RVF) between the two groups. There was no difference in overall 2-year survival between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Digoxin use was associated with reduction in GIB events, but not in RVF or mortality. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to investigate optimal timing and patient population.

Left ventricular assist devices: A historical perspective at the intersection of medicine and engineering

Over the last half-century, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) technology has progressed from conceptual therapy for failed cardiopulmonary bypass weaning to an accepted destination therapy for advanced heart failure. The history of LVAD engineering is defined by an initial development phase, which demonstrated the feasibility of such an approach, to the more recent three major generations of commercial devices. In this review, we explore the engineering challenges of LVADs, how they were addressed over time, and the clinical outcomes that resulted from each major technological development. The first generation of commercial LVADs were pulsatile devices, which lacked the appropriate durability due to their number of moving components and hemocompatibility. The second generation of LVADs was defined by replacement of complex, pulsatile pumps with primarily axial, continuous-flow systems with an impeller in the blood passageway. These devices experienced significant commercial success, but the presence of excessive trauma to the blood and in-situ bearing resulted in an unacceptable burden of adverse events. Third generation centrifugal-flow pumps use magnetically suspended rotors within the pump chamber. Superior outcomes with this newest generation of devices have been observed, particularly with respect to hemocompatibility-related adverse events including pump thrombosis, with fully magnetically levitated devices. The future of LVAD engineering includes wireless charging foregoing percutaneous drivelines and more advanced pump control mechanisms, including synchronization of the pump flow with the native cardiac cycle, and varying pump output based on degree of physical exertion using sensor or advanced device-level data triggers.

Cardiac Surgery in Advanced Heart Failure

Mechanical circulatory support and heart transplantation are established surgical options for treatment of advanced heart failure. Since the prevalence of advanced heart failure is progressively increasing, there is a clear need to treat more patients with mechanical circulatory support and to increase the number of heart transplantations. This narrative review summarizes recent progress in surgical treatment options of advanced heart failure and proposes an algorithm for treatment of the advanced heart failure patient at >65 years of age.

Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Centrifugal Pump and Driving Devices of the OASSIST ECMO System: A Preclinical Evaluation in the Ovine Model

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides cardiopulmonary support for critically ill patients. Portable ECMO devices can be applied in both in-hospital and out-of-hospital emergency conditions. We evaluated the safety and biocompatibility of a novel centrifugal pump and ECMO device of the OASSIST ECMO System (Jiangsu STMed Technologies Co., Suzhou, China) in a 168-h ovine ECMO model.

Methods: The portable OASSIST ECMO system consists of the control console, the pump drive, and the disposable centrifugal pump. Ten healthy sheep were used to evaluate the OASSIST ECMO system. Five were supported on veno-venous ECMO and five on veno-arterial ECMO, each for 168 h. The systemic anticoagulation was achieved by continuous heparin infusion to maintain the activated clotting time (ACT) between 220 and 250 s. The rotary speed was set at 3,200–3,500 rpm. The ECMO configurations and ACT were recorded every 6 hours (h). The free hemoglobin (fHb), complete blood count, and coagulation action test were monitored, at the 6th h and every 24 h after the initiation of the ECMO. The dissection of the pump head and oxygenator were conducted to explore thrombosis.

Results: Ten sheep successfully completed the study duration without device-related accidents. The pumps ran stably, and the ECMO flow ranged from 1.6 ± 0.1 to 2.0 ± 0.11 L/min in the V-V group, and from 1.8 ± 0.1 to 2.4 ± 0.14 L/min in the V-A group. The anticoagulation was well-performed. The ACT was maintained at 239.78 ± 36.31 s, no major bleeding or thrombosis was observed during the ECMO run or in the autopsy. 3/5 in the V-A group and 4/5 in the V-V group developed small thrombus in the bearing pedestal. No obvious thrombus formed in the oxygenator was observed. The hemolytic blood damage was not significant. The average fHb was 0.17 ± 0.12 g/L. Considering hemodilution, the hemoglobin, white blood cell, and platelets didn't reduce during the ECMO runs.

Conclusions: The OASSIST ECMO system shows satisfactory safety and biocompatibility for the 168-h preclinical evaluation in the ovine model. The OASSIST ECMO system is promising to be applied in clinical conditions in the future.

Left Ventricular Assist Device: Indication, Timing, and Management

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are indicated in inotrope-dependent heart failure (HF) patients with pure or predominant LV dysfunction. Survival benefit is less clear in ambulatory, advanced HF. Timing is crucial: early, unnecessary exposure to the risks of surgery, and device-related complications (infections, stroke, and bleeding) should be weighed against the probability of dying or developing irreversible right ventricular and/or end-organ dysfunction while deferring implant. The interplay between LVAD and heart transplantation depends largely on donor availability and allocation rules. Postoperatively, quality of life depends on patients' expectations and is influenced by complications. Patients' preferences, prognosis, and alternative options-including palliation-should be openly discussed and reviewed before and after the operation.

Comparative assessment of different versions of axial and centrifugal LVADs: A review

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have gained tremendous acceptance for the treatment of end-stage heart failure patients. Among different versions, axial flow and centrifugal flow LVADs have shown remarkable potential for clinical implants. It is also very crucial to know which device serves its purpose better to treat heart failure patients. A thorough comparison of axial and centrifugal LVADs, which may guide doctors in deciding before the implant, still lacks in the literature. In this work, an assessment of axial and centrifugal LVADs has been made to suggest a better device by comparing their engineering, clinical, and technological development of design aspects. Hydrodynamic and hemodynamic aspects for both types of pumps are discussed along with their biocompatibility, bearing types, and sizes. It has been observed numerically that centrifugal LVADs perform better over axial LVADs in every engineering aspect like higher hydraulic efficiency, better characteristics curve, lesser power intake, and also lesser blood damage. However, the clinical outcomes suggest that centrifugal LVADs experience higher events of infections, renal, and respiratory dysfunction. In contrast, axial LVADs encountered higher bleeding and cardiac arrhythmia. Moreover, recent technological developments suggested that magnetic type bearings along with biocompatible coating improve the life of LVADs.

The Year in Coagulation: Selected Highlights from 2020

This is the second annual review in the Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia to cover highlights in coagulation for cardiac surgery. The goal of this article is to provide readers with a focused summary from the literature of the prior year's most important coagulation topics. In 2020, this included a discussion covering allogeneic transfusion, antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy, factor concentrates, coagulation testing, mechanical circulatory support, and the effects of coronavirus disease 2019.