Heart transplant waiting list implications of increased ventricular assist device use as a bridge strategy: A national analysis

Clinical Outcomes of Cardiac Transplantation in Heart Failure Patients with Previous Mechanical Cardiocirculatory Support

Objectives: Heart failure (HF) remains a significant public health issue, with heart transplantation (HT) being the gold standard treatment for end-stage HF. The increasing use of mechanical circulatory support, particularly left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), as a bridge to transplant (BTT), presents new perspectives for increasingly complex clinical scenarios. This study aimed to compare long-term clinical outcomes in patients in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) receiving an LVAD as BTT to those undergoing direct-to-transplant (DTT) without mechanical support, focusing on survival and post-transplant complications. Methods: A retrospective, single-center study included 105 patients who underwent HT from 2010. Patients were divided into two groups: BTT (n = 28) and DTT (n = 77). Primary endpoints included overall survival at 1 and 7 years post-HT. Secondary outcomes involved late complications, including organ rejection, renal failure, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), and cerebrovascular events. Results: At HT, the use of LVADs results in longer cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamping times in the BTT group; nevertheless, surgical complexity does not affect 30-day mortality. Survival at 1 year was 89.3% for BTT and 85.7% for DTT (p = 0.745), while at 7 years, it was 80.8% and 77.1%, respectively (p = 0.840). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of major complications, including permanent dialysis, organ rejection, and CAV. However, a higher incidence of cerebrovascular events was noted in the BTT group (10.7% vs. 2.6%). Conclusions: LVAD use as BTT does not negatively impact early post-transplant survival compared to DTT. At long-term follow-up, clinical outcomes remained similar across groups, supporting LVADs as a viable option for bridging patients to transplant.

Novel Imaging Technologies for Accurate Assessment of Cardiac Allograft Performance

Purpose of the Review

The current lack of objective and quantitative assessment techniques to determine cardiac graft relative viability results in risk-averse decision-making, which negatively impact the utilization of cardiac grafts. The purpose of this review is to highlight the current deficiencies in cardiac allograft assessment before focusing on novel cardiac assessment techniques that exploit conventional and emerging imaging modalities, including ultrasound, magnetic resonance, and spectroscopy.

Recent Findings

Extensive work is ongoing by the scientific community to identify improved objective metrics and tools for cardiac graft assessment, with the goal to safely increasing the number and proportion of hearts accepted for transplantation.

Summary

This review briefly discusses the in situ and ex vivo tools currently available for clinical organ assessment, before focusing on the individual capabilities of ultrasound, magnetic resonance, and spectroscopy to provide insightful, non-invasive information regarding cardiac graft functional and metabolic status that may be used to predict outcome after transplantation.