Three-dimensional design of a geometric model for an ocular prosthesis in ex vivo anophthalmic socket models

Oculopalpebral prosthesis prototype design using the additive manufacturing technique: A case study

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has advanced for applications in the field of reconstructive surgery. This study reports the application of a comprehensive methodology to obtain an anatomical model, using computed tomography and 3D printing, to treat a patient with cancer who designed a prototype oculopalpebral prosthesis for the reconstruction of the affected area of the face (left eye). A personalized prototype was obtained, which adapted to the face of the person, and improved the aesthetics and quality of life. The applied techniques helped to make definitive prostheses using materials that could be permanent. The training and tests carried out in this study favored the understanding and assimilation of the technology and the possibility of applying it to patients in need of facial prosthetic rehabilitation.

Automatic data-driven design and 3D printing of custom ocular prostheses

Millions of people require custom ocular prostheses due to eye loss or congenital defects. The current fully manual manufacturing processes used by highly skilled ocularists are time-consuming with varying quality. Additive manufacturing technology has the potential to simplify the manufacture of ocular prosthetics, but existing approaches just replace to various degrees craftsmanship by manual digital design and still require substantial expertise and time. Here we present an automatic digital end-to-end process for producing custom ocular prostheses that uses image data from an anterior segment optical coherence tomography device and considers both shape and appearance. Our approach uses a statistical shape model to predict, based on incomplete surface information of the eye socket, a best fitting prosthesis shape. We use a colour characterized image of the healthy fellow eye to determine and procedurally generate the prosthesis's appearance that matches the fellow eye. The prosthesis is manufactured using a multi-material full-colour 3D printer and postprocessed to satisfy regulatory compliance. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by presenting results for 10 clinic patients who received a 3D printed prosthesis. Compared to a current manual process, our approach requires five times less labour of the ocularist and produces reproducible output.

Utilizing 3D Printing Technology to Create Prosthetic Irises: Proof of Concept and Workflow

PURPOSE

There are currently limited treatment options for aniridia. In this context, 3D printed iris implants may provide a cost-effective, cosmetically acceptable alternative for patients with aniridia. The purpose of this study was to develop a proof-of-concept workflow for manufacturing 3D printed iris implants using a silicone ink palette that aesthetically matches iris shades, identified in slit lamp images.

METHODS

Slit lamp iris photos from 11 healthy volunteers (3 green; 4 blue; 4 brown) were processed using k-means binning analyses to identify two or three prominent colors each. Candidate silicone inks were created by precisely combining pigments. A crowdsourcing survey software was used to determine color matches between the silicone ink swatches and three prominent iris color swatches in 2 qualifying and 11 experimental workflows.

RESULTS

In total, 54 candidate silicone inks (20 brown; 16 green; 18 blue) were developed and analyzed. Survey answers from 29 individuals that had passed the qualifying workflow were invited to identify "best matches" between the prominent iris colors and the silicone inks. From this color-match data, brown, blue, and green prototype artificial irises were printed with the silicone ink that aesthetically matched the three prominent colors. The iris was printed using a simplified three-layer five-branch starburst design at scale (12.8 mm base disc, with 3.5 mm pupil).

CONCLUSIONS

This proof-of-concept workflow produced color-matched silicone prosthetic irises at scale from a panel of silicone inks using prominent iris colors extracted from slit lamp images. Future work will include printing a more intricate iris crypt design and testing for biocompatibility.

Three-Dimensional Computer-Aided Design of a Full-Color Ocular Prosthesis with Textured Iris and Sclera Manufactured in One Single Print Job

Three-dimensional (3D) printing of ocular prosthesis has been scarcely described in medical literature. Although ocular prostheses have been 3D printed successfully, iris colors are often manually added to the final product afterward. The objective was to produce a 3D-printed ocular prosthesis with textured iris and sclera in one single print job. We designed an average 3D model of an ocular prosthesis in 3D software, and took a high-resolution digital photograph of a human eye, which was processed in graphical software. By using functions called "displacement mapping" and "UV mapping" on the 3D model, the extent of height displacement was used to digitally produce a textured and colored iris and sclera on the 3D model. By using a polyjet 3D printer, different colors and materials could be used for different prosthesis components. We were able to design and 3D print a lifelike ocular prosthesis with realistic iris and sclera texture. The process took less than 4 h, of which 2.5 h are "printing time," reducing labor time compared with conventional methods. This proof-of-concept adds valuable knowledge to the future manufacture of 3D-printed ocular prostheses, which has several benefits over the conventional production method: 3D printing is much faster, reproducible, and prostheses can easily be digitally adjusted and reprinted. This study is an important step in the development of a full-fledged 3D workflow to produce lifelike custom eye prostheses.

3D Printing in Eye Care

Three-dimensional printing enables precise modeling of anatomical structures and has been employed in a broad range of applications across medicine. Its earliest use in eye care included orbital models for training and surgical planning, which have subsequently enabled the design of custom-fit prostheses in oculoplastic surgery. It has evolved to include the production of surgical instruments, diagnostic tools, spectacles, and devices for delivery of drug and radiation therapy. During the COVID-19 pandemic, increased demand for personal protective equipment and supply chain shortages inspired many institutions to 3D-print their own eye protection. Cataract surgery, the most common procedure performed worldwide, may someday make use of custom-printed intraocular lenses. Perhaps its most alluring potential resides in the possibility of printing tissues at a cellular level to address unmet needs in the world of corneal and retinal diseases. Early models toward this end have shown promise for engineering tissues which, while not quite ready for transplantation, can serve as a useful model for in vitro disease and therapeutic research. As more institutions incorporate in-house or outsourced 3D printing for research models and clinical care, ethical and regulatory concerns will become a greater consideration. This report highlights the uses of 3D printing in eye care by subspecialty and clinical modality, with an aim to provide a useful entry point for anyone seeking to engage with the technology in their area of interest.

Establishing a point-of-care additive manufacturing workflow for clinical use

Additive manufacturing, or 3-Dimensional (3-D) Printing, is built with technology that utilizes layering techniques to build 3-D structures. Today, its use in medicine includes tissue and organ engineering, creation of prosthetics, the manufacturing of anatomical models for preoperative planning, education with high-fidelity simulations, and the production of surgical guides. Traditionally, these 3-D prints have been manufactured by commercial vendors. However, there are various limitations in the adaptability of these vendors to program-specific needs. Therefore, the implementation of a point-of-care in-house 3-D modeling and printing workflow that allows for customization of 3-D model production is desired. In this manuscript, we detail the process of additive manufacturing within the scope of medicine, focusing on the individual components to create a centralized in-house point-of-care manufacturing workflow. Finally, we highlight a myriad of clinical examples to demonstrate the impact that additive manufacturing brings to the field of medicine.

Measuring quality of care and life in patients with an ocular prosthesis

PURPOSE

In patients with an anophthalmic condition, the primary determinants of success of ocular prosthetic rehabilitation are satisfaction with care and quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study is to develop a condition-specific questionnaire as a patient-reported outcome measure for patients with an ocular prosthesis.

METHODS

Observational cross-sectional prospective study. We included 100 patients (52 female, 48 male, > 18 years old) with an anophthalmic and ocular prosthetic condition existing for 2 years or more. The patients completed a pre-tested 72-item questionnaire regarding their experience on living with an ocular prosthesis in four domains of QoL: single vision and care, wearing comfort, physical appearance and motility, and psychosocial functioning. Associations with demographic factors and condition- and prosthesis-related variables were investigated with multivariate analysis. The questionnaire was reduced with principal component analysis to obtain the Global Ocular Prosthesis Score (GOPS).

RESULTS

Satisfaction scores for each QoL domain were high with a mean visual analogue score between 7.2 and 7.6. Patients were generally satisfied with the physical appearance of the artificial eye and reported adequate psychosocial functioning. Patients described the reduced peripheral visual field and socket discharge as chief complaints. The test was reduced to a 20-item questionnaire. The mean GOPS was 70.87 (median 75.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with longstanding ocular prosthetic wear are satisfied with their physical appearance and report adequate psychosocial functioning. A concise 20-item questionnaire for the anophthalmic condition is a valuable tool to quantitatively measure patient-reported outcome of ocular prosthetic rehabilitation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04321382, 03/2020, retrospectively registered.