Efficacy and safety of different agents, dosages and strategies of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Case report: heart failure related to intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF

BACKGROUND

Intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor is considered the first-line treatment for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. It has potential risks for circulatory system, which should be particularly carefully evaluated in older patients. In this case study, we aim to discuss the potential impact of this treatment regimen on cardiac health.

CASE PRESENTATION

This case report describes an elderly patient with no prior history of heart disease who exhibited unexpected heart enlargement and dysfunction. Throughout the patient's hospital stay, various potential causes were investigated, leading to the hypothesis that a 10-year history of intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor could be related to the observed clinical manifestations. The patient was advised to discontinue this treatment, and after a 2-month follow-up period, there was a gradual improvement in the patient's cardiac structure and function.

CONCLUSION

This manuscript highlights the importance of conducting cardiac examinations before and after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment, especially for individuals at risk of heart diseases like the elderly. It emphasizes the need to carefully weigh the benefits and risks of treatment regimens to ensure optimal therapeutic outcomes.

Anti-VEGF Treatment Strategies for 3 Subtypes of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in a Clinical Setting: A Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan

PURPOSE

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is classified into typical AMD (tAMD), polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), and retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP). This study investigated clinical features of the 3 subtypes and visual outcome associated with treatment regimens in a large cohort of patients with nAMD in a clinical setting.

DESIGN

Retrospective multicenter cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Five hundred patients with treatment-naive nAMD (268 tAMD, 200 PCV, and 32 RAP) initiated with anti-VEGF agents and followed for 1 year.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed to extract demographic data, best-corrected visual acuity at baseline and 1 year after treatment initiation, spectral-domain OCT findings, baseline fellow eye condition, systemic factors, treatment strategies, and number of intravitreal injections in the first year.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome measures were anti-VEGF treatment strategy (ranibizumab or aflibercept, anti-VEGF regimen, concomitant photodynamic therapy, drug switch), best-corrected visual acuity at 1 year, and factors associated with visual acuity.

RESULTS

Patients with RAP were significantly older, were more commonly women, and had more macular lesions in fellow eye than patients with tAMD and PCV. Smoking history and diabetes prevalence were not different among the 3 subtypes. Frequencies of subretinal fluid were higher and intraretinal fluid were lower in tAMD and PCV than in RAP, whereas serous pigment epithelial detachment and subretinal hemorrhage were higher in PCV than in tAMD and RAP. Choice of anti-VEGF agents and treatment regimens did not differ among 3 subtypes. The aflibercept-to-ranibizumab ratio was approximately 7:3. The mean number of injections in 1 year was 5.3 ± 2.4 in nAMD overall, which was significantly less in pro re nata (PRN) than in treat and extend (TAE) regardless of the anti-VEGF agent. Best-corrected visual acuity improved in all 3 subtypes, although it was not significant in patients with RAP.

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical study demonstrates that treatment regimens were similar in 3 subtypes and aflibercept was used in 70% of all patients. Approximately 5 injections were given in the first year regardless of the anti-VEGF agent, which was significantly less in PRN regimen than in TAE. Visual acuity improvement was observed after 1-year anti-VEGF therapy in all 3 subtypes, but was not significant in RAP.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Comparative Efficacy of Brolucizumab in the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Introduction

A systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to evaluate the comparative efficacy of brolucizumab relative to other anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatments for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) at 1 and 2 years, and overall safety and injection frequency of each treatment.

Methods

An SLR identifying randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before June 2021 according to a pre-specified protocol was followed by a Bayesian NMA to compare brolucizumab (6 mg q12w/q8w) against sham and all relevant anti-VEGF regimens. Pooled mean injection frequency, serious adverse ocular events, and discontinuation rates were estimated for each treatment regimen.

Results

Nineteen RCTs were included in NMA base-case analysis. Brolucizumab (6 mg q12w/q8w) with loading-phase (LP) demonstrated superior best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) gains to sham both at year 1 (mean difference 16.8 [95%CrI 13.3, 20.4]) and year 2 (mean difference 21.2 [95%CrI 17.4, 25.0]) and was comparable to other anti-VEGFs. Brolucizumab (6 mg q12w/q8w) also showed superior retinal thickness reduction to most comparators including ranibizumab (0.5 mg q4w; year 1 mean difference − 50.1 [95%CrI − 70.3, − 29.8]; year 2 mean difference − 49.5 [95%CrI − 70.8, − 28.6]), aflibercept (2 mg q8w; year 1 mean difference − 39.7 [95%CrI − 52.9, − 26.4]; year 2 mean difference − 35.0 [95%CrI − 49.1, − 21.4]), and faricimab (6 mg q16w/q8w; year 1 mean difference − 27.6 [95%CrI − 42.3, − 12.8]). Brolucizumab (6 mg q12w/q8w) showed similar rates of treatment discontinuation and serious and overall adverse events (both years). At year 2, pooled annualized injection frequency was lowest for brolucizumab (6 mg q12w/q8w) and highest for ranibizumab (0.5 mg q4w) at 5.7 and 11.5 injections annually, respectively.

Conclusion

Among all licensed anti-VEGF treatments, brolucizumab showed superior reduction in retinal thickness and comparable BCVA gains and discontinuation rates, despite having the lowest injection frequency. The current study provides the most up-to-date, robust comparison of treatments for nAMD.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-022-02193-3.

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Monotherapies for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Mixed Treatment Comparison

Background: We aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monotherapy to identify its utilization and prioritization in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods: Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials comparing the recommended anti-VEGF agents (ranibizumab, bevacizumab, aflibercept, brolucizumab, and conbercept) under various therapeutic regimens. Outcomes of interest included the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), serious adverse events, the proportion of patients who gained ≥15 letters or lost <15 letters in BCVA, the mean change in central retinal thickness, and the number of injections within 12 months. Results: Twenty-seven trials including 10,484 participants and eighteen treatments were identified in the network meta-analysis. The aflibercept 2 mg bimonthly, ranibizumab 0.5 mg T&E, and brolucizumab 6 mg q12w/q8w regimens had better visual efficacy. Brolucizumab had absolute superiority in anatomical outcomes and a relative advantage of safety, as well as good performance of aflibercept 2 mg T&E. The proactive regimens had slightly better efficacy but a slightly increased number of injections versus the reactive regimen. Bevacizumab had a statistically non-significant trend toward a lower degree of efficacy and safety. Conclusion: The visual efficacy of four individual anti-VEGF drugs is comparable. Several statistically significant differences were observed considering special anti-VEGF regimens, suggesting that brolucizumab 6 mg q12w/q8w, aflibercept 2 mg bimonthly or T&E, and ranibizumab 0.5 mg T&E are the ideal anti-VEGF regimens for nAMD patients. In the current landscape, based on the premise of equivalent efficacy and safety, the optimal choice of anti-VEGF monotherapies seems mandatory to obtain maximal benefit.

Real-life management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in France: a nationwide observational study using retrospective claims data

AIMS

Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is standard care for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), but the recommended monthly injection regimen is burdensome. Evidence suggests low injection/monitoring frequencies in clinical practice and suboptimal vision outcomes. This observational cohort study uses administrative claims data from the French national healthcare system to assess anti-VEGF treatment patterns and nAMD-specific healthcare resource demands and costs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

nAMD patients ≥50 years initiating intravitreal ranibizumab, aflibercept or bevacizumab treatment (2014‒2015), and propensity score-matched non-nAMD patients (controls), were identified from the Echantillon Généraliste de Bénéficiaires database. Outcomes of interest included anti-VEGF treatment patterns, and healthcare resource utilization and associated costs of patients vis-à-vis controls over 24 months.

RESULTS

Study patients (n = 355) received (mean) 5.2 and 2.4 anti-VEGF injections over 0‒12 and 12‒24 months, respectively. Most patients (79.0%) remained on their initial anti-VEGF agent; among treatment switchers, the most common transition was from ranibizumab to aflibercept. During follow-up, nAMD patients were more likely than controls to require ophthalmology visits (99.7% vs. 44.8%), ocular procedures (optical coherence tomography/angiography/fundoscopy) (96.9% vs. 27.2%), cataract surgery (13.0% vs. 6.7%), and medical transports (38.0% vs. 31.9%). Mean numbers of ophthalmology visits (25.1 vs. 1.2) and medical transports (6.0 vs. 3.5) were higher (p<.01) among nAMD patients. Total reimbursed costs were two-fold higher for nAMD patients than controls (mean €16,799 vs. €8,255) due to higher treatment costs (€6,847 vs. €1,156), medical fees (€1,858 vs. €295), hospital fees (€6,396 vs. €5,235), and transport costs (€358 vs. €259). Excess total healthcare cost was (mean) €5,279 and €7,918 over the first 12 and 24 months of treatment, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Current intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment and monitoring requirements place a considerable economic burden on the French healthcare system. New intravitreal therapies with extended dosing intervals and predictable efficacy might reduce demand for ophthalmology services.