Milani GP, Groothoff JW, Vianello FA, Fossali EF, Paglialonga F, Edefonti A, Agostoni C, Consonni D, van Harskamp D, van Goudoever JB, Schierbeek H, Oosterveld MJS. Bioimpedance and Fluid Status in Children and Adolescents Treated With Dialysis.
Am J Kidney Dis 2017;
69:428-435. [PMID:
28089477 DOI:
10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.10.023]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2016] [Accepted: 10/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Assessment of hydration status in patients with chronic kidney failure treated by dialysis is crucial for clinical management decisions. Dilution techniques are considered the gold standard for measurement of body fluid volumes, but they are unfit for day-to-day care. Multifrequency bioimpedance has been shown to be of help in clinical practice in adults and its use in children and adolescents has been advocated. We investigated whether application of multifrequency bioimpedance is appropriate for total-body water (TBW) and extracellular water (ECW) measurement in children and adolescents on dialysis therapy.
STUDY DESIGN
A study of diagnostic test accuracy.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS
16 young dialysis patients (before a hemodialysis session or after peritoneal dialysis treatment) from the Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy, and the Emma Children's Hospital-Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
INDEX TEST
TBW and ECW volumes assessed by multifrequency bioimpedance.
REFERENCE TESTS
TBW and ECW volumes measured by deuterium and bromide dilution, respectively.
RESULTS
Mean TBW volumes determined by multifrequency bioimpedance and deuterium dilution were 19.2±8.7 (SD) and 19.3±8.3L, respectively; Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias between the 2 methods of -0.09 (95% limits of agreement, -2.1 to 1.9) L. Mean ECW volumes were 8.9±4.0 and 8.3±3.3L measured by multifrequency bioimpedance and bromide dilution, respectively; mean bias between the 2 ECW measurements was +0.6 (95% limits of agreement, -2.3 to 3.5).
LIMITATIONS
Participants ingested the deuterated water at home without direct supervision by investigators, small number of patients, repeated measurements in individual patients were not performed.
CONCLUSIONS
Multifrequency bioimpedance measurements were unbiased but imprecise in comparison to dilution techniques. We conclude that multifrequency bioimpedance measurements cannot precisely estimate TBW and ECW in children receiving dialysis.
Collapse