The HemoCue WBC DIFF system could be used for leucocyte and neutrophil counts but not for full differential counts

Preparing of Point-of-Care Reagents for Risk Assessment in the Elderly at Home by a Home-Visit Nurse and Verification of Their Analytical Accuracy

With the rising number of older adults residing at home, there is a growing need for risk assessment and patient management in home nursing. This study aims to develop point-of-care test (POCT) reagents that can aid in risk assessment and home care, especially in settings with limited resources. Our focus was on creating a C-reactive protein (CRP) POCT, which can accurately diagnose clinically significant judgment values in home nursing. Additionally, we assessed the utility of the HemoCue WBC DIFF system in providing differential counts of white blood cells (WBC). These performances were compared with a laboratory test using blood samples from patients with pneumonia. The CRP POCT showed a comparable result to that of a laboratory method, with an average kappa index of 0.883. The leukocyte count showed good agreement with the reference method. While the correlation coefficients for both neutrophil and lymphocyte counts were deemed acceptable, it was observed that the measured values tended to be smaller in cases where the cell count was higher. This proportional error indicates a weak correlation with the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. CRP POCT and WBC counts provided reliable and accurate judgments. These tools may benefit risk management for older adults at home, patients with dementia who cannot communicate, and those living in depopulated areas.

Point-of-care self-testing for measuring total white blood cells and C-reactive protein - a pilot study for future home-monitoring of patients during antibiotic treatment at home

BACKGROUND

During home treatment with antibiotics, patients' laboratory results of total white blood cell count (WBC) with neutrophil counts and C-reactive protein (CRP) are drawn and monitored at the hospital. The aim of the study was to examine the feasibility and analytical accuracy of hospitalized patients 18 years or older self-testing using two point-of-care tests (POCT).

METHODS

The pilot study included 41 hospitalized patients. A subjective judgment of the patients' ability to conduct the self-testing was made along with a comparison of the POCT measurements of WBC, neutrophil counts and CRP with standard laboratory measurements. Correlation between the POCTs and laboratorial values was assessed by coefficient of determination and the level of agreement between the means was assessed by Bland Altman test.

RESULTS

Of the 38 patients conducting self-testing, 78% were men and the mean age was 61.8 years. 28 patients (73.7%) successfully performed self-testing on the first try while, 10 (26.3%) 'HemoCue WBC DIFF' measurements showed an error code. All the patients successfully performed the 'QuickRead go CRP' self-test. Comparison of the 'HemoCue WBC DIFF' results with the laboratory results of WBC and neutrophil counts showed good agreement. On the other hand, 'QuickRead go CRP' results showed a small but significant systematic disagreement compared to the laboratory results.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that the POCTs can be used by some patients and factors influencing the patient participation included psychological and physical limitations. Both POCTs appeared to have an acceptable clinical level of accuracy.

Ecoimmunology in the field: Measuring multiple dimensions of immune function with minimally invasive, field-adapted techniques

OBJECTIVE

Immune function is multifaceted and characterizations based on single biomarkers may be uninformative or misleading, particularly when considered across ecological contexts. However, measuring the many facets of immunity in the field can be challenging, since many measures cannot be obtained on-site, necessitating sample preservation and transport. Here we assess state-of-the-art methods for measuring immunity, focusing on measures that require a minimal blood sample obtained from a finger prick, which can be: (1) dried on filter paper, (2) frozen in liquid nitrogen, or (3) stabilized with chemical reagents.

RESULTS

We review immune measures that can be obtained from point-of-care devices or from immunoassays of dried blood spots (DBSs), field methods for flow cytometry, the use of RNA or DNA sequencing and quantification, and the application of immune activation assays under field conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Stable protein products, such as immunoglobulins and C-reactive protein are reliably measured in DBSs. Because less stable proteins, such as cytokines, may be problematic to measure even in fresh blood, mRNA from stabilized blood may provide a cleaner measure of cytokine and broader immune-related gene expression. Gene methylation assays or mRNA sequencing also allow for the quantification of many other parameters, including the inference of leukocyte subsets, though with less accuracy than with flow cytometry. Combining these techniques provides an improvement over single-marker studies, allowing for a more nuanced understanding of how social and ecological variables are linked to immune measures and disease risk in diverse populations and settings.

Point-of-care testing technologies for the home in chronic kidney disease: a narrative review

Point-of-care testing (POCT) performed by the patient at home, paired with eHealth technologies, offers a wealth of opportunities to develop individualized, empowering clinical pathways. The non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) patient who is at risk of or may already be suffering from a number of the associated complications of CKD represents an ideal patient group for the development of such initiatives. The current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and drive towards shielding vulnerable individuals have further highlighted the need for home testing pathways. In this narrative review we outline the evidence supporting remote patient management and the various technologies in use in the POCT setting. We then review the devices currently available for use in the home by patients in five key areas of renal medicine: anaemia, biochemical, blood pressure (BP), anticoagulation and diabetes monitoring. Currently there are few devices and little evidence to support the use of home POCT in CKD. While home testing in BP, anticoagulation and diabetes monitoring is relatively well developed, the fields of anaemia and biochemical POCT are still in their infancy. However, patients' attitudes towards eHealth and home POCT are consistently positive and physicians also find this care highly acceptable. The regulatory and translational challenges involved in the development of new home-based care pathways are significant. Pragmatic and adaptable trials of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design, as well as continued technological POCT device advancement, are required to deliver these innovative new pathways that our patients desire and deserve.

Exercise-induced amplification of mitogen-stimulated oxidative burst in whole blood is strongly influenced by neutrophil counts during and following exercise

This study characterized the effect of moderate- or vigorous-intensity exercise on leukocyte counts, using fingertip sampling, and mitogen-stimulated oxidative burst, measured in whole blood with a point-of-care test. In a randomized crossover design, 13 healthy adults (mean ± SD age: 22 ± 2 years; seven male, six female) cycled for 30-min, once at 52 ± 5% V ˙ O2peak and on another occasion at 74 ± 9% V ˙ O2peak . Blood was sampled at baseline, immediately post-exercise, and 15- and 60-min post-exercise. The leukocyte differential and mitogen-stimulated Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) production were assessed. Lymphocytes increased immediately post-exercise and decreased below pre-exercise levels 15- and 60-min later. Lymphocyte mobilization immediately post-exercise was 59 ± 36% greater with vigorous- compared to moderate-intensity exercise (p < 0.01). Neutrophils increased immediately after exercise (38 ± 19%, p < 0.01) remaining elevated 60-min later (50 ± 34%, p < 0.01; averaged across intensities) and did not differ between intensities (p = 0.259). Mitogen-stimulated ROS production was amplified immediately (+32 ± 37%, p < 0.01) and 60-min post-exercise (+56 ± 57%, p < 0.01; averaged across intensities) compared to rest and did not differ with intensity (p = 0.739). Exercise-induced amplification of ROS production was abolished when correcting for neutrophil, monocyte and platelet counts and correlated most strongly with neutrophil mobilization immediately (r = 0.709, p < 0.01) and 60-min after vigorous exercise (r = 0.687, p < 0.01). Leukocyte kinetics can be assessed using fingertip blood sampling in exercise settings. Exercise-induced amplification of oxidative burst is detectable with a point-of-care test, but results are strongly influenced by neutrophil counts, which may not be routinely quantified.

Evaluation of the LeukoScope for Point-of-Care Measurement of White Blood Cell and Neutrophil Counts in Malawi

White blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil counts are important laboratory tests used by clinicians to assess a variety of conditions. However, current methods to measure WBC and neutrophil counts are difficult to perform at the point of care, being either cost or labor prohibitive. To meet this need, we developed the LeukoScope: a portable, imaging-based system to measure WBC and neutrophil counts from a drop of blood. Here, we present the performance of the LeukoScope in 136 pediatric and 164 neonatal subjects at a central hospital in Malawi. For pediatric patients, 95.4, 66.7, and 80.0% of samples with normal, low, and high WBC counts, respectively, were correctly identified, and 88.6, 100.0, and 89.3% of samples with normal, low, and high neutrophil counts, respectively, were correctly identified. Accuracy was lower overall for neonatal samples; 92.1, 64.3, and 26.7% of samples with normal, low, and high WBC counts, respectively, were correctly identified, and 73.2 and 78.6% of samples with normal and high neutrophil counts, respectively, were correctly identified. Results of this study show that the LeukoScope can help meet need for point-of-care measurement of WBC counts in pediatric patients and highlight the challenges of point-of-care assessment of WBC counts in neonatal patients.

Point-of-care measurement of clozapine concentration using a finger-stick blood sample

BACKGROUND

The use of clozapine demands regular monitoring of clozapine plasma concentrations and of white blood cell parameters. The delay between sending blood samples for analysis and receiving the results hinders clinical care. Point-of-care testing (POCT) can provide drug assay results within a few minutes.

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the utility of a novel point-of-care device that can measure clozapine concentrations using capillary blood samples collected via a finger stick.

METHOD

During a five-week period starting in June 2019 eligible patients were asked to provide a finger-stick capillary sample in addition to their usual venous blood sample. Samples were analysed by the novel point-of-care device and by the standard laboratory method. Capillary blood samples were tested by the MyCare™ Insite POCT analyser, and a quantitative measurement of clozapine concentration was provided within six minutes.

RESULTS

A total of 309 patients agreed to measurements by the two methods. Analysis revealed clozapine concentrations in venous blood as determined by the laboratory method ranged from 20 to 1310 ng/mL and by POCT from 7 to 1425 ng/mL. There was a strong positive correlation (R = 0.89) between the results from the venous and the capillary sample methods. The slope of the association between standard assay and MyCare™ Insite was 1.0 with an intercept of -21 ng/mL, indicating minimal bias.

CONCLUSION

Clozapine concentrations can be accurately measured at the point of care using capillary blood samples collected via a finger stick. This approach may be more acceptable than venous sampling to patients and, with almost instant results available, more useful to clinicians.

Using a fingerstick test for haematological monitoring in patients treated with clozapine

BACKGROUND

Treatment with clozapine requires regular blood monitoring in order to minimise the risk of agranulocytosis. The demands on patients and clinicians associated with monitoring may be reduced by using point-of-care, as opposed to lab-based assessments. We assessed the utility of a device that can measure white blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil counts by capillary fingerstick blood.

METHOD

The performance of a small, portable device (HemoCue® WBC DIFF System) was compared with that of a widely used laboratory analyser (ADVIA® 2120i) for measuring WBC and neutrophil counts. Patients with schizophrenia who were being treated with clozapine (n = 201) provided a fingerstick capillary sample and a venous sample for the respective assays.

RESULTS

WBC counts and neutrophil counts from venous blood as determined by ADVIA 2120i, ranged from 3.0 × 10⁹/l to 19.5 × 10⁹/l, and 1.2 × 10⁹/l to 15.9 × 10⁹/l, respectively. There was a strong correlation between the results from venous and the capillary sample methods (WBC: R = 0.89, neutrophil: R = 0.92). By Passing-Bablok regression analysis, the slope of the association between ADVIA^® 2120i and HemoCue WBC DIFF for WBC was 1.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.944-1.086], with intercept at -0.9 (95% CI -1.43 to -0.45). For neutrophils, the slope was 0.870 (95% CI 0.817-0.923), with intercept at -0.19 (95% CI -0.43 to 0.02). Overall, mean biases of -0.95 × 10⁹/l for WBC, and -0.91 × 10⁹/l for neutrophils were observed for the capillary blood method compared with the venous blood method. Below the clinical cutoff intervals for clozapine monitoring WBC (<3.5 × 10⁹/l) and neutrophils (<1.5 × 10⁹/l) these biases were -1.1 × 10⁹/l for WBC, and -0.25 × 10⁹/l for neutrophils.

CONCLUSION

Results from the capillary blood HemoCue WBC DIFF analyser compared well with the venous blood ADVIA 2120i analyser for determining WBC and neutrophil counts. There was a slight overall bias, with the capillary method reporting lower values for both measures. Fingerstick point-of-care analysis is suitable for monitoring blood counts in patients on clozapine, although confirmatory standard venous testing is recommended for test results falling below accepted thresholds.

White blood cell counting at point-of-care testing: A review

White blood cells, which are also called leukocytes, are found in the immune system that are involved in protecting the body against infections and foreign invaders. Conventional methods of leukocyte analysis provide valuable and accurate information to medical specialists. Analyzing and diagnosing of a disease requires a combination of multiple biomarkers, in some cases, however, such as personal health care, this will occupy some medical resources and causes unnecessary consumption. Traditional method (such as flow cytometer) for WBC counting is time and labor consuming. Compared to gold standard (flow-based fraction/micropore filtration) or improved filtration methods for WBC counting, this is still a lengthy and time consuming process and can lead to membrane fouling due to the rapid accumulation of biological materials. Therefore, the analysis of WBC counts requires more compact and efficient equipment. The microfluidic technologies, powered by different field (force, thermal, acoustic, optical, magnetic) and other methods for leukocyte counting and analysis, are much cost-efficient and can be used in in-home or in resource-limited areas to achieve Point-of-Care (POC). In this review, we highlight the mainstream devices that have been commercialized and extensively employed for patients for WBC counting, Next, we present some recent development with regards to leucocyte counting (mainly microfluidic technologies) and comment on their relative merits. We aim to focus and discuss the possibility of achieving POC and help researchers to tackle individual challenges accordingly. Finally, we offer some technologies in addition to previous detection devices, such as image recognition technology and cloud computing, which we believe have great potential to further promote real-time detection and improve medical diagnosis.

Clinical training and validation of the LeukoScope: a low-cost, point-of-care device to perform white blood cell and neutrophil counts

A white blood cell (WBC) count with partial differential is an important clinical laboratory test. However, current methods to perform a WBC count and differential are difficult to use at the point of care or too expensive for use in low-resource settings. To meet this need, we developed the LeukoScope: a low-cost system to measure a WBC and neutrophil count from a single drop of blood at the point of care. The LeukoScope is battery powered and has a sample-to-answer time of <5 minutes. A drop of blood from a finger stick is added to a LeukoScope sample cartridge where pre-dried acridine orange fluorescently stains WBCs. The cartridge is then inserted into the LeukoScope reader where a portable fluorescence microscope captures a color image of the sample, which is analyzed to report results to the user. The LeukoScope system was tested at the point of care using fingerprick samples collected from 105 general oncology patients in Houston, TX. Performance of the LeukoScope was compared to that of a HemoCue WBC DIFF performed using the same fingerprick sample; clinical laboratory analysis of a venous blood draw was used as the gold standard in all cases. Bland-Altman analysis showed that the LeukoScope and HemoCue WBC DIFF had similar accuracy for measurement of WBC and neutrophil counts as compared to the gold standard. Seven out of eight patients with abnormal WBC count values were correctly identified using the LeukoScope, while six out of eight were correctly identified using the HemoCue WBC DIFF. Five out of six patients with abnormal neutrophil counts were correctly identified using the LeukoScope, while six of six were correctly identified using the HemoCue WBC DIFF.

C-reactive protein and neutrophil count laboratory test requests from primary care: what is the demand and would substitution by point-of-care technology be viable?

AIMS : C-reactive protein (CRP) and neutrophil count (NC) are important diagnostic indicators of inflammation. Point-of-care (POC) technologies for these markers are available but rarely used in community settings in the UK. To inform the potential for POC tests, it is necessary to understand the demand for testing. We aimed to describe the frequency of CRP and NC test requests from primary care to central laboratory services, describe variability between practices and assess the relationship between the tests.

METHODS

We described the number of patients with either or both laboratory tests, and the volume of testing per individual and per practice, in a retrospective cohort of all adults in general practices in Oxfordshire, 2014-2016.

RESULTS

372 017 CRP and 776 581 NC tests in 160 883 and 275 093 patients, respectively, were requested from 69 practices. CRP was tested mainly in combination with NC, while the latter was more often tested alone. The median (IQR) of CRP and NC tests/person tested was 1 (1-2) and 2 (1-3), respectively. The median (IQR) tests/practice/week was 36 (22-52) and 72 (50-108), and per 1000 persons registered/practice/week was 4 (3-5) and 8 (7-9), respectively. The median (IQR) CRP and NC concentrations were 2.7 (0.9-7.9) mg/dL and 4.1 (3.1-5.5)×10⁹/L, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The high demand for CRP and NC testing in the community, and the range of results falling within the reportable range for current POC technologies highlight the opportunity for laboratory testing to be supplemented by POC testing in general practice.

Preliminary Results from a Prospective Study Comparing White Blood Cell and Neutrophil Counts from a Laboratory to Those Measured with a New Device in Patients with Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

If blood tests were performed at home, unnecessary trips of patients for chemotherapy could be avoided. The HemoCue® WBC DIFF device was tested at home by 14 patients with breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 42 measurements of white blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil counts with the device at home were compared to laboratory measurements performed within 3 hours. Bland-Altman plots were created for limits of agreement that should be less than 1.0×10⁹/l for WBC and 0.5×10⁹/l for neutrophils to indicate a similar grade of intensity.

RESULTS

Limits of agreement were -1.61×10⁹/l and +2.34×10⁹/l for WBC and -1.15×10⁹/l and +1.39×10⁹/l for neutrophils. All patients considered the device advantageous, particularly because they did not have to travel or wait for results. Most patients experienced problems with the lancet when taking blood samples.

CONCLUSION

Disagreement of WBC and neutrophil counts between methods appeared clinically relevant. Findings need to be verified in a larger cohort, including the use of a different type of lancet.

Who's the boss: determining the control pathways of cardiovascular and cellular immune responses to acute stress

Acute stress responses are known to include increases in heart rate and blood pressure, as well as increases in the number of circulating immune cells, all of which are governed by the autonomic nervous system. This laboratory practical measures cardiovascular and circulating immune cell responses to a passive (cold pressor) and active (mental arithmetic) acute stress task in student participants. The results allow them to examine the different patterns of autonomic response they elicit (approximated by heart rate and blood pressure responses), and knowledge of these responses can then be used to infer the governing autonomic aspect of the increases in circulating immune cells from the results. This activity can be either adapted from teacher-led methods to inquiry, asking students to design the details of the acute stress tasks, or developed by asking students to design a follow-up experiment that could be used to provide direct evidence for their conclusions. Data collected provide a platform for teaching data analysis and interpretation, as well as critical thinking.