Sustained quality improvement collaboration and composite morbidity reduction in extremely low gestational age newborns

Reducing severe intraventricular haemorrhage rates in <26-week preterm infants with bedside assessment and care bundle implementation

AIM

To assess staff adherence to a 'Preterm Brain Injury Prevention Bundle', and its effectiveness in reducing severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) rates and risk factors in extremely preterm infants born at <26 weeks' gestation.

METHODS

Adherence to the bundle was assessed using a novel bedside assessment tool, with immediate feedback to bedside staff post-assessment. Data on IVH rates and associated risk factors were stratified by IVH severity, and compared between pre- and post-bundle implementation.

RESULTS

Of 203 bedside assessments, good adherence was observed in 12/28 items (43%), while the remaining items required improvement. Rates of grade 3/4 IVH reduced (39.2% pre-bundle vs. 19.0% post-bundle, p = 0.13). Thermoregulation and base excess improved (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04 respectively) after bundle implementation.

CONCLUSION

Reduced severe IVH rates post-bundle implementation may be attributed to staff education and improved clinical parameters. Adherence to the bundle interventions varied which highlighted target areas for future education.

Quality Improvement Interventions to Prevent Intraventricular Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Quality improvement may reduce the incidence and severity of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants. We evaluated quality improvement interventions (QIIs) that sought to prevent or reduce the severity of intraventricular hemorrhage.

METHODS

PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and citations of selected articles were searched. QIIs that had reducing incidence or severity of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants as the primary outcome. Paired reviewers independently extracted data from selected studies.

RESULTS

Eighteen quality improvement interventions involving 5906 infants were included. Clinical interventions in antenatal care, the delivery room, and the NICU were used in the QIIs. Four of 10 QIIs reporting data on intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and 9 of 14 QIIs reporting data on severe IVH saw improvements. The median Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set score was 11 of 16. Clinical intervention heterogeneity and incomplete information on quality improvement methods challenged the identification of the main reason for the observed changes. Publication bias may result in the inclusion of more favorable findings.

CONCLUSIONS

QIIs demonstrated reductions in the incidence and severity of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants in some but not all settings. Which specific interventions and quality improvement methods were responsible for those reductions and why they were successful in some settings but not others are not clear. This systematic review can assist teams in identifying potentially better practices for reducing IVH, but improvements in reporting and assessing QIIs are needed if systematic reviews are to realize their potential for guiding evidence-based practice.

The Triple Aim Quality Improvement Gold Standard Illustrated as Extremely Premature Infant Care

OBJECTIVES

The Triple Aim is widely regarded as the quality improvement gold standard that enhances population health, lowers costs, and betters individual care. There have been no large-scale, sustained demonstrations of such improvement in healthcare. Illustrating the Triple Aim using relevant extremely premature infant outcomes might highlight interwoven proficiency and efficiency complexities that impede sustained value progress.

STUDY DESIGN

Ten long-term collaborating neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in the Vermont Oxford Network calculated the Triple Aim in 230/7 to 276/7-week infants using three surrogate measures: (1) population health/x-axis-eight major morbidity rates as a composite, risk-adjusted metric; (2) cost/y-axis-total hospital length of stay; and (3) individual care/z-axis-mortality, then illustrated this relationship as a sphere within a three-dimensional cube.

RESULTS

Three thousand seven hundred six infants born between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2019, with mean (standard deviation) gestational age of 25.7 (1.4) weeks and birth weight of 803 (208) grams were analyzed. Triple Aim three-axis cube positions varied inconsistently comparing NICUs. Each NICUs' sphere illustrated mixed x- and z-axis movement (clinical proficiency), and y-axis movement (cost efficiency). No NICU demonstrated the theoretically ideal Triple Aim improvement in all three axes. Backward movement in at least one axis occurred in eight NICUs. The whole-group Triple Aim sphere moved forward along the x-axis (better morbidities metric), but moved backward in the y-axis length of stay and z-axis mortality measurements.

CONCLUSION

Illustrating the Triple Aim gold standard as extreme prematurity outcomes reveals complexities inherent to simultaneous attempts at improving interwoven quality and cost outcomes. Lack of progress using relevant Triple Aim parameters from our well-established collaboration highlights the difficulties prioritizing competing outcomes, variable potentially-better-practice applications amongst NICUs, unmeasured biologic interactions, and obscured cultural-environmental contexts that all likely affect care. Triple Aim excellence, if even remotely possible, will necessitate scalable, evidence-based methodologies, pragmatism regarding inevitable trade-offs, and wise constrained-resource decisions.

KEY POINTS

· The Triple Aim gold standard is elusive. There is no demonstration of sustained, large-scale success in healthcare and our quality improvement network has previously published benchmark extreme prematuritymorbidity improvements.. · Extreme prematurity outcomes illustrated as the Triple Aim show uneven results in relevant surrogate parameters and Triple Aim achievement, if even possible, will necessitate evidence-based methodologies that are scalable.. · Pragmatism, inevitable trade-offs, and wise constrained-resource decisions are required for Triple Aim success..

Parents who spent more hours in intensive care units with their low birthweight newborn infant did not achieve autonomous care faster

AIM

We examined the correlation between how long it took the parents of very low birthweight infants, born weighing up to 1500 g, to provide different kinds of autonomous care in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

METHODS

This prospective observational was conducted in the NICU of a Spanish hospital from 10 January 2020 to 3 May 2022. The unit had 11 beds single-family rooms and provided eight beds in an open bay room. The study examined breastfeeding, patient safety, participation in rounds, pain prevention and cleanliness.

RESULTS

We studied 96 patients and their parents and there was no correlation between any type of care and the time it took parents to provide it autonomously. Parents in the single-family room cohort spent a median of 9.5 h per day between them in the NICU, while the parents in the open bay room spent 7.0 h with their infants (p = 0.03). However, parents in the single-family room group were able to recognise pain faster (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Parents in single-family rooms spent more time in the NICU and recognised pain faster but did not achieve autonomous care faster than parents in the open bay group.

Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Infants at <29 Weeks of Gestation Born in Canada Between 2009 and 2016

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate changes in mortality or significant neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) in children born at <29 weeks of gestation in association with national quality improvement initiatives.

STUDY DESIGN

This longitudinal cohort study included children born at 22^0/7 to 28^6/7 weeks of gestation who were admitted to Canadian neonatal intensive care units between 2009 and 2016. The primary outcome was a composite rate of death or significant NDI (Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition score <70, severe cerebral palsy, blindness, or deafness requiring amplification) at 18-24 months corrected age. To evaluate temporal changes, outcomes were compared between epoch 1 (2009-2012) and epoch 2 (2013-2016). aORs were calculated for differences between the 2 epochs accounting for differences in patient characteristics.

RESULTS

The 4426 children included 1895 (43%) born in epoch 1 and 2531 (57%) born in epoch 2. Compared with epoch 1, in epoch 2 more mothers received magnesium sulfate (56% vs 28%), antibiotics (69% vs 65%), and delayed cord clamping (37% vs 31%) and fewer infants had a Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology, version II >20 (31% vs 35%) and late-onset sepsis (23% vs 27%). Death or significant NDI occurred in 30% of children in epoch 2 versus 32% of children in epoch 1 (aOR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.99). In epoch 2, there were reductions in the need for hearing aids or cochlear implants (1.4% vs 2.6%; aOR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31-0.82) and in blindness (0.6% vs.1.4%; aOR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18-0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Among preterm infants born at <29 weeks of gestation, composite rates of death or significant NDI and rates of visual and hearing impairment were significantly lower in 2013-2016 compared with 2009-2012.

Reduction of Severe Intraventricular Hemorrhage in Preterm Infants: A Quality Improvement Project

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this quality improvement project was to reduce the rate of severe intraventricular hemorrhage (sIVH) by 50% within 3 years for extremely preterm infants born at a children's teaching hospital.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team developed key drivers for the development of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants. Targeted interventions included the development of potentially better practice guidelines, promoting early noninvasive ventilation, consistent use of rescue antenatal betamethasone, and risk-based indomethacin prophylaxis. The outcome measure was the rate of sIVH. Process measures included the rate of intubation within 24 hours and receipt of rescue betamethasone and risk-based indomethacin prophylaxis. Common markers of morbidity were balancing measures. Data were collected from a quarterly chart review and analyzed with statistical process control charts. The preintervention period was from January 2012 to March 2016, implementation period was from April 2016 to December 2018, and sustainment period was through June 2020.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 268 inborn neonates born at <28 weeks' gestation or <1000 g (127 preintervention and 141 postintervention). The rate of sIVH decreased from 14% to 1.2%, with sustained improvement over 2 and a half years. Mortality also decreased by 50% during the same time period. This was associated with adherence to process measures and no change in balancing measures.

CONCLUSIONS

A multipronged quality improvement approach to intraventricular hemorrhage prevention, including evidence-based practice guidelines, consistent receipt of rescue betamethasone and indomethacin prophylaxis, and decreasing early intubation was associated with a sustained reduction in sIVH in extremely preterm infants.

Do small baby units improve extremely premature infant outcomes?

Increasing numbers of neonatal intensive care units have formed small baby units or small baby teams with the intention to optimize care of extremely premature infants. Considerable time, energy, and resources are required to develop and sustain complex quality improvement constructs, so legitimate questions about effectiveness, unintended consequences, and lost opportunity costs warrant scrutiny. The small baby unit literature is diminutive. Errors of chance, bias, and confounding secondary to insufficient definitions of process and outcome metrics, overlapping quality improvement projects, and limited cost analyses restrict firm conclusions. Well-established quality improvement methodologies such as evidence-based guidelines, standardized variability reduction using measurement-and-adjust techniques, family-integrated focus, and developmentally sensitive care, reliably improve outcomes for all-sized premature infants. There is not compelling published evidence that adding specialized small baby units or designated teams for extremely premature infants further enhances short- or long-term health if robust quality improvement fundamentals are already imbedded within local culture.

Creating a small baby program: a single center's experience

Creation of a small baby program requires special resources and multidisciplinary engagement. Such a program has the potential to improve patient care, parent and staff satisfaction, collaboration and communication. We have described benefits, challenges, and practical approaches to creating and maintaining a small baby program that could be a model for the development of special programs for other sub-populations within in the NICU.

Extremely low gestational age infants: Developing a multidisciplinary care bundle

BACKGROUND

Clinical experience in managing extremely low gestational age infants, particularly those born <24 weeks' gestation, is limited in Canada. Our goal was to develop a bedside care bundle for infants born <26 weeks' gestation, with special considerations for infants of <24 weeks, to harmonize and improve quality of care.

METHODS

We created a multidisciplinary working group with experience in caring for preterm infants, searched the literature from 2000 to 2019 to identify best practices for the care of extremely preterm infants and consulted colleagues across Canada and internationally. Iterative improvements were made following the Plan-Do-Study-Act methodology.

RESULTS

A care bundle, created in October 2015, was divided into three time periods: initial resuscitation/stabilization, the first 72 hours and days 4 to 7, with each period subdivided in 8 to 12 care themes. Revisions and practice changes were implemented to improve skin integrity, admission temperature, timing of initiation of feeds, reliability of transcutaneous CO2 monitoring and ventilation. Of 127 infants <26 weeks admitted between implementation and end of 2019, 78 survived to discharge (61%).

CONCLUSION

It will be important to determine, with ongoing auditing and further evaluation, whether our care bundle led to improvements of short- and long-term outcomes in this population. Our experience may be useful to others caring for extremely low gestational age infants.

Collaboration to Improve Neuroprotection and Neuropromotion in the NICU: Team Education and Family Engagement

The number of babies born extremely low birth weight surviving to be discharged home after experiencing the NICU continues to improve. Unfortunately, early sensory development for these babies occurs in an environment vastly different from the intended in-utero environment and places them at high risk of long-term neurodevelopmental and neurocognitive challenges. Our goal in the NICU must transition from simply discharge home to supporting the neurosensory development necessary for a thriving lifetime. To accomplish a goal of thriving families and thriving babies, it is clear the NICU interprofessional team must share an understanding of neurosensory development, the neuroprotective strategies safeguarding development, the neuropromotive strategies supporting intended maturational development, and the essential nature of family integration in these processes. We share the educational endeavors of 11 center collaboratives in establishing the foundational knowledge necessary to support preterm babies and their families.

Collaboration to Improve Neuroprotection and Neuropromotion in the NICU: A Quality Improvement Initiative

Implementation of neuroprotective and neuropromotive (NP²) strategies is essential to optimize outcomes for premature infants. Developmental care, once an addition to medical care, is now recognized by the NICU team as foundational to support long-term neurodevelopment of micropremature infants. A group approach to education and sharing implementation processes can result in collaborative and individual center improvements. This article includes examples of quality improvement (QI) education and tools inspired by implementation of NP² strategies in a consortium of 11 NICUs in the United States and Canada. Process change guided by potentially better practices are key; however, consistency of application must be included to ensure success. Assessment of NP² practices via use of surveys and practice audits are described. Increases occurred in family NP² education and provision of support during painful experiences. There were also increases in skin-to-skin holding, 2-person caregiving, and focus on reducing unnecessary painful procedures.

Continued improvement in morbidity reduction in extremely premature infants

OBJECTIVE

Provide a progress report updating our long-term quality improvement collaboration focused on major morbidity reduction in extremely premature infants 23-27 weeks.

METHODS

10 Vermont Oxford Network (VON) neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) (the POD) sustained a structured alliance: (A) face-to-face meetings, site visits and teleconferences, (B) transparent process and outcomes sharing, (C) utilisation of evidence-based potentially better practice toolkits, (D) family integration and (E) benchmarking via a composite mortality-morbidity score (Benefit Metric). Morbidity-specific toolkits were employed variably by each NICU according to local priorities. The eight major VON morbidities and the risk-adjusted Benefit Metric were compared in two epochs 2010-2013 versus 2014-2018.

RESULTS

5888 infants, mean (SD) gestational age 25.8 (1.4) weeks, were tracked. The POD Benefit Metric significantly improved (p=0.03) and remained superior to the aggregate VON both epochs (p<0.001). Four POD morbidities significantly improved through 2018 - chronic lung disease (48%-40%), discharge weight <10th percentile (32%-22%), any late infection (19%-17%) and periventricular leukomalacia (4%-2%). In epoch 2, 34% of survivors had none of the eight major morbidities, while 36% had just one. Mortality did not change.

CONCLUSIONS

Inter-NICU collaboration, process and outcomes sharing and potentially better practice toolkits sustain improvement in 23-27 week morbidity rates, notably chronic lung disease, extrauterine growth restriction and the lowest zero-or-one major morbidity rate reported by a quality improvement collaboration. Unrevealed biological and cultural variables affect morbidity rates, countless remain unmeasured, thus duplication to other quality improvement groups is challenging. Understanding intensive care as innumerable interactions and constant flux that defy convenient linear constructs is fundamental.

A systematic review of reports of quality improvement for bronchopulmonary dysplasia

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is the most common morbidity of preterm infants, and its incidence has not responded to research and intervention efforts to the same degree as other major morbidities associated with prematurity. The complexity of neonatal respiratory care as well as persistent inter-institutional variability in BPD rates suggest that BPD may be amenable to quality improvement (QI) efforts. We present a systematic review of QI for BPD in preterm infants. We identified 22 reports from single centers and seven from collaborative efforts published over the past two decades. In almost all of the reports, respiratory QI interventions successfully reduced BPD or other key respiratory measures, particularly for infants with birth weight over 1000 g. Several themes and lessons from existing reports may help inform future efforts in both research and QI to impact the burden of BPD.

Micro-premature infants in New Jersey show improved mortality and morbidity from 2000-2018

BACKGROUND

Micro-premature newborns, gestational age (GA) ≤ 25 weeks, have high rates of mortality and morbidity. Literature has shown improving outcomes for extremely low gestational age newborns (ELGANs) GA ≤ 29 weeks, but few studies have addressed outcomes of ELGANs ≤ 25 weeks.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the trends in outcomes for ELGANs born in New Jersey, from 2000 to 2018 and to compare two subgroups: GA 23 to 25 weeks (E1) and GA 26 to 29 weeks (E2).

METHODS

Thirteen NICUs in NJ submitted de-identified data. Outcomes for mortality and morbidity were calculated.

RESULTS

Data from 12,707 infants represents the majority of ELGANs born in NJ from 2000 to 2018. There were 3,957 in the E1 group and 8,750 in the E2 group. Mortality decreased significantly in both groups; E1, 43.2% to 30.2% and E2, 7.6% to 4.5% over the 19 years. The decline in E1 was significantly greater than in E2. Most morbidities also showed significant improvement over time in both groups. Survival without morbidity increased from 14.5% to 30.7% in E1s and 47.2% to 69.9% in E2s. Similar findings held for 501-750 and 751-1000g birth weight strata.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant declines in both mortality and morbidity have occurred in ELGANs over the last two decades. These rates of improvements for the more immature ELGANs of GA 230 to 256 weeks were greater than for the more mature group in several outcomes. While the rates of morbidity and mortality remain high, these results validate current efforts to support the micro-premature newborn.

The Influence of the Variation in Sepsis Rate between Neonatal Intensive Care Units on Neonatal Outcomes in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants

Sepsis is commonly known to affect neonatal outcomes. We assessed how much center-to-center variability of the sepsis rate affects the outcomes of very-low-birth-weight infants (VLBWIs). 7,493 VLBWIs registered in the Korean Neonatal Network from 2013 to 2016 were classified into three groups according to the sepsis rate: low sepsis group (LS) < 25^th percentile versus intermediate sepsis group (IS) 25^th–75^th versus high sepsis group (HS) ≥ 75^th. The incidence density of sepsis for the LS, IS, and HS groups were 1.17, 3.17, and 8.88 cases/1,000 person-days. After propensity score matching was done for multiple antenatal and perinatal factors, the odds ratio of death, moderate to severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia and/or death, periventricular leukomalacia, and survival without major morbidities for the HS group were 2.0 (95% confidence interval 1.4–2.8), 1.9 (1.5–2.4), 1.5 (1.1–2.3) and 0.7 (0.5–0.8) when compared with the IS group, and 2.2 (1.6–3.2), 2.3 (1.8–2.9), 2.0 (1.3–2.9), and 0.7 (0.6–0.9) when compared with the LS group. There were no significant differences in those outcomes between the LS and IS groups. Hence, nationwide quality improvements to control the sepsis rate especially in units with a high sepsis rate will be helpful to improve the outcomes of VLBWIs.