Good clinical outcomes following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunts in Budd-Chiari syndrome

French guidelines on TIPS: Indications and modalities

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has become essential in the treatment or prevention of portal hypertension-related complications. In the early 1990s, the primary indication was refractory bleeding. It is now proposed for the treatment of ascites for the prevention of bleeding and in patients with vascular diseases of the liver. Thus, there are a growing number of patients being treated with TIPS all over the world. The broadening of indications, the involvement of multiple stakeholders, the need for an accurate selection, the positioning in relation to transplantation and the lack of standardization in pre-therapeutic assessment, in the procedure itself and in the follow-up have led the board of the French Association for the Study of the Liver to establish recommendations.

TEN-YEAR OUTCOMES OF TIPS FOR BUDD-CHIARI SYNDROME: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

BACKGROUND

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) results from the obstruction of the hepatic venous flow, usually at the level of the hepatic vein or inferior vena cava. When left untreated, it can progress with several complications, including liver cirrhosis. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) appears to be effective in a subgroup of BCS patients.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of TIPS effectiveness in BCS treatment, considering the survival rate, reduction in portosystemic pressure, need for liver transplantation, technical failure, and shunt dysfunction for up to 10 years of follow-up.

METHODS

We evaluated 17 studies published in PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases, which used TIPS as a treatment for BCS, comprising 618 subjects between 18 and 78 years old. We assessed the bias risk by the NOS, NHI, and JBI scales for cohort stu-dies, before-after studies, and case series, respectively. We conducted the meta-analyses by extracting the number of events and the total patients evaluated to perform the proportion meta-analyses using the R software ("meta" package - version 4.9-6).

RESULTS

The pooled results (95%CI) showed a 19% (25.9-12.5%) rate of portosystemic pressure reduction, 6% (1-12%) rate for the need for liver transplants despite the use of TIPS, 2% (1-6%) technical failure rate, 30% (18-46%) shunt dysfunction rate, and 88% (81-93%) for the mean frequency of patients alive between 1 and 10 years after the procedure. We stratified survival rate and found an 86% (74-93%) prevalence of living subjects during less than five years, 92% (83-97%) at five years, and a 77% frequency (68-83%) of patients alive ten years after the TIPS placement.

CONCLUSION

TIPS is an effective treatment for BCS, providing a high 10-year frequency of living patients and a significant decrease in portosystemic pressure. The need for liver transplants after TIPS and the technical failure rate is low.

[Splanchnic vein thrombosis]

Splanchnic vein thrombosis includes Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis. These diseases share common features: (i) they are rare diseases and (ii) they can lead to portal hypertension and its complications. Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis in the absence of underlying liver disease share many risk factors, the most common being myeloproliferative neoplasms. A rapid and comprehensive workup for thrombosis risk factors is necessary in these patients. Long-term anticoagulation is indicated in most patients. Portal vein thrombosis can also develop in patients with cirrhosis, and is associated with a worse course of cirrhosis. Indications for anticoagulation in patients with cirrhosis are increasing. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is a second-line procedure in this setting. Because of the rarity of these diseases, high-level evidence studies are rare. However, collaborative studies have provided a better understanding of their natural history and allowed to improve the management of these patients. This review focuses on the causes, diagnosis, and management of patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, patients with portal vein thrombosis without underlying liver disease, and patients with cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis.

Percutaneous Transhepatic Direct Portosystemic Shunt for a Patient With Budd-Chiari Syndrome Using a Balloon as a Target in a Stenotic Inferior Vena Cava

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) patients with portal hypertension are often treated with a direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (DIPS) or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and angioplasty. DIPS can be problematic, however, due to the technical difficulty of the procedure. To address this problem, we describe a method using the balloon used for inferior vena cava (IVC) dilatation as a puncture target to safely perform DIPS in a BCS patient with complete hepatic vein occlusion and stenosis of the IVC. To perform balloon dilation, the puncture is made through the internal jugular vein, and the guidewire is advanced to the IVC with stenosis. After dilatation of the IVC, the direct left lateral subdistrict branch of the portal vein is percutaneously punctured directly from the cardiac fossa (targeting the inflated balloon in the IVC), and the IVC puncture is done through the portal vein. After creating a pull-through route, a stent is placed between the left portal vein and the IVC. The procedure is completed without any complications. This technique has the potential to form the basis of a safe and reliable DIPS procedure.

Management of splanchnic vein thrombosis

The expression splanchnic vein thrombosis encompasses Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis. These disorders have common characteristics: they are both rare diseases which can cause portal hypertension and its complications. Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis in the absence of underlying liver disease share many risk factors, among which myeloproliferative neoplasms represent the most common; a rapid comprehensive work-up for risk factors of thrombosis is needed in these patients. Long-term anticoagulation is indicated in most patients. Portal vein thrombosis can also develop in patients with cirrhosis and in those with porto-sinusoidal vascular liver disease. The presence and nature of underlying liver disease impacts the management of portal vein thrombosis. Indications for anticoagulation in patients with cirrhosis are growing, while transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is now a second-line option. Due to the rarity of these diseases, studies yielding high-grade evidence are scarce. However, collaborative studies have provided new insight into the management of these patients. This article focuses on the causes, diagnosis, and management of patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, portal vein thrombosis without underlying liver disease, or cirrhosis with non-malignant portal vein thrombosis.

Three-fold Increased Risk of Death in Budd-Chiari Syndrome Compared to Matched Controls: A Population-based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) have an elevated risk of overall and liver-specific mortality, but this has not been quantified on a population level nor compared against a matched general population cohort.

METHODS

We identified all patients in Sweden with a recorded diagnosis of BCS in the Swedish National Patient Register between 1987 and 2016. Patients with BCS were matched for age, sex, and municipality at baseline with up to 10 reference individuals from the general population. Data on cause-specific mortality were obtained from the Causes of Death Register. A Cox regression model was performed to investigate rates of all-cause and cause-specific mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 478 patients with BCS were matched with 4603 reference individuals. Of the patients with BCS, 43% were men, the median age was 58 years, 39% had a recorded diagnosis of a precipitating risk factor, and 13% had underlying liver disease. During a follow-up of up to 29 years, 243 (51%) of the patients with BCS died compared with 1346 (29%) of the reference individuals. Overall mortality was 70 per 1000 person-years in patients with BCS compared with 28 per 1000 person-years in reference individuals, translating into an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 3.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-3.6). Although liver-related mortality was particularly high (aHR, 47.6; 95% CI, 16.5-137.4), liver disease accounted for only 10% of deaths in BCS. The most common cause of death was cardiovascular disease (aHR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.7-2.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with BCS in Sweden had a 3-fold higher risk of death compared with general population reference individuals. Although mortality from liver diseases was high in relative terms, most patients died from cardiovascular causes.

Budd-Chiari syndrome in myeloproliferative neoplasms: A review of literature

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are defined as clonal disorders of the hematopoietic stem cell in which an exaggerated production of terminally differentiated myeloid cells occurs. Classical, Philadelphia-negative MPNs, i.e., polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis, exhibit a propensity towards the development of thrombotic complications that can occur in unusual sites, e.g., portal, splanchnic or hepatic veins, the placenta or cerebral sinuses. The pathogenesis of thrombotic events in MPNs is complex and requires an intricate mechanism involving endothelial injury, stasis, elevated leukocyte adhesion, integrins, neutrophil extracellular traps, somatic mutations (e.g., the V617F point mutation in the JAK2 gene), microparticles, circulating endothelial cells, and other factors, to name a few. Herein, we review the available data on Budd-Chiari syndrome in Philadelphia-negative MPNs, with a particular focus on its epidemiology, pathogenesis, histopathology, risk factors, classification, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management.

No Differences in Rotational Thromboelastometry Measurements between Portal and Peripheral Circulation in Cirrhotic Patients Undergoing TIPS

Background: In patients with liver cirrhosis, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is considered a standardized treatment of refractory ascites or variceal bleeding. TIPS thrombosis (TT) and/or portal vein thrombosis (PVT) are possible complications during/after TIPS placement. Previous studies suggested increased clotting activity in portal circulation (PORC). This pilot study aimed to evaluate alterations and differences of coagulation function in PORC and in peripheral circulation (PERC) via rotational thromboelastometry during TIPS. Methods: Blood samples were collected from cirrhotic patients (n = 13; median Model of End Stage Liver Disease, MELD Score: 12; median age: 60 years) undergoing TIPS (10/13 TIPSs were elective procedures due to refractory ascites) as follows: median cubital vein (MCV; PERC)—confluence of the three hepatic veins to the inferior cava vein (HV/ICV; PORC)—portal vein (PV; PORC)—TIPS (PORC). This research utilized four variables of the extrinsic test EXTEM, i.e., clotting time (CT), clot formation time (CFT), maximum clot firmness (MCF), and maximum lysis (ML). Results: EXTEM results [mean, M (range) ± standard deviation, SD (range)] showed no significant differences for CT [M (70–73) ± SD (9–13); p = 0.93] or CFT [M (137–155) ± SD (75–112); p = 0.97] or MCF [M (51–54) ± SD (9–10); p = 0.90] or ML [M (9–10) ± SD (4–5); p = 0.89] between the compartments, i.e., MCV vs. HV/ICV vs. PV vs. TIPS. Overall, we detected no differences in coagulation function between PERC and PORC. Conclusion: These results are in contrast to previous reports suggesting increased clotting activity in PORC vs. PERC in association with liver cirrhosis. Rotational thromboelastometry-based evaluation of coagulation function in PERC appears to reliably reflect coagulation function in PORC with respect to risk estimation for TT and/or PVT in cirrhotic patients undergoing TIPS.

Survival and clinical success of endovascular intervention in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome: A systematic review

Budd-Chiari syndrome is a complex clinical disorder of hepatic venous outflow obstruction, originating from the accessory hepatic vein (HV), large HV, and suprahepatic inferior vena cava (IVC). This disorder includes both HV and IVC obstructions and hepatopathy. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the survival rate and clinical success of different types of endovascular treatments for Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS). All participant studies were retrieved from four databases and selected according to the eligibility criteria for systematic review of patients with BCS. The survival rate, clinical success of endovascular treatments in BCS, and survival rates at 1 and 5 years of publication year were calculated accordingly. A total of 3398 patients underwent an endovascular operation; among them, 93.6% showed clinical improvement after initial endovascular treatment. The median clinical success rates for recanalization, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), and combined procedures were 51%, 17.50%, and 52.50%, respectively. The median survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 51% and 51% for recanalization, 17.50% and 16% for TIPS, and 52.50% and 49.50% for combined treatment, respectively. Based on the year of publication, the median survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 23.50% and 22.50% before 2000, 41% and 41% in 2000‒2005, 35% and 35% in 2006‒2010, 51% and 48.50% in 2010‒2015, and 56% and 55.50% after 2015, respectively. Our findings indicate that the median survival rate at 1 and 5 years of recanalization treatment is higher than that of TIPS treatment, and recanalization provides better clinical improvement. The publication year findings strongly suggest progressive improvements in interventional endovascular therapy for BCS. Thus, interventional therapy restoring the physiologic hepatic venous outflow of the liver can be considered as the treatment of choice for patients with BCS which is a physiological modification procedure.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for portal hypertension: 30 years experience from China

Liver diseases are a major cause of illness and death worldwide. In China, liver diseases, primarily viral hepatitis, affect approximately 300 million people, thus having a major impact on the global burden of liver diseases. Portal hypertension is the most severe complication of chronic liver diseases, including ascites, hepatic encephalopathy and bleeding from gastroesophageal varices. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) represents a very effective treatment of these complications. Since its introduction 30 years ago in China, the use of TIPS has evolved and has played an increasingly important role in the management of the complications of portal hypertension. This review will focus on the history, current application and management of complications of TIPS in China.

Budd-Chiari Syndrome Management: Controversies and Open Issues

Budd-Chiari Syndrome (BCS) is due to thrombosis of hepatic veins (HVs), inferior vena cava (IVC) or both, leading to impaired hepatic venous outflow [...].

Efficacy and Safety of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation for Budd-Chiari Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the critical role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in the management of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS), as the data with respect to the safety and outcome of TIPS in patients with BCS are scarce because of the rarity of the disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive search of literature of various databases from 2000 to October 2021 was conducted for studies evaluating the outcome of TIPS in patients with BCS. The primary outcomes of the analysis were technical and clinical success, adverse events and mortality associated with TIPS, dysfunction of TIPS, need for TIPS revision, need for liver transplantation (LT), and 1-year survival.

RESULTS

A total of 33 studies (1,395 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled rates and 95% confidence intervals of various outcomes were 98.6% (97.6-99.7) for technical success, 90.3% (86.0-94.6) for clinical success, 10.0% (6.5-13.6) for major adverse events, 0.5% (0.2-1.0) for TIPS-related mortality, 11.6% (7.8-15.4) for post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy (HE), 40.1% (32.5-47.7) for TIPS dysfunction, 8.6% (4.9-12.4) for the need for TIPS revision, 4.5% (2.8-6.2) for the need for LT, and 94.6% (93.1-96.1) for 1-year survival. Publication bias was seen with all outcomes except for post-TIPS HE, TIPS dysfunction, and the need for LT.

CONCLUSIONS

The existing literature supports the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of TIPS in the treatment of BCS. Deciding the optimal timing of TIPS in BCS needs further studies.

Long-Term Improvement in Liver Function Following Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in Patients With Budd-Chiari Syndrome

Background

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) relieves hepatic venous obstruction in Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS), but the effect on liver function is unclear, particularly outside the immediate post-treatment period. This study aims to evaluate the long-term impact of TIPS on liver function and outcomes in BCS patients.

Methods

Twenty patients with BCS who underwent TIPS from 1999 to 2018 were included. Demographic data and clinical data at the time of TIPS procedure, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years post-TIPS were collected.

Results

There were 13 (13/20, 65%) women and 7 (7/20, 35%) men with a mean age at the time of TIPS of 42.6 ± 12.8 years. The median time from BCS diagnosis to TIPS was 41 (IQR: 4-165) days. The number of patients with severe ascites decreased significantly from 10/17 (58.8%) at the time of TIPS, to 1/16 (7.7%), 1/13 (7.7%), 2/16 (12.5%), 1/14 (7.1%), and 0/8 (0%) at 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years post-TIPS, respectively. 4/20 (20%) patients developed new hepatic encephalopathy post-TIPS procedure. Child-Pugh score significantly decreased from a score of 9.4 ± 1.8 pre-TIPS to 7.6 ± 1.8 at 6 months, 7.4 ± 1.5 at 12 months, 7.3 ± 1.6 at 2 years, 6.8 ± 1.5 at 5 years, and 6.4 ± 0.7 at 10 years post-TIPS. Fifteen (15/20, 75%) patients required TIPS revision including 4 (4/15, 26.7%) within 30 days, 2 (2/15, 13.3% within 1 month to 1 year, and 9 (9/15, 60%) at more than 1 year. Eight (8/20, 40%) patients underwent liver transplantation (LT) at median time of 7.3 (IQR 3.2-12.9) years after TIPS.

Conclusion

TIPS placement for BCS results in sustained resolution of symptoms and improved liver function. Despite the frequent need for revisions, the long-term durability of TIPS can forgo the need for LT in the majority of patients.

Evaluation of outcome from endovascular therapy for Budd-Chiari syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This study was performed to evaluate the outcome of endovascular intervention therapy for Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) and compare recanalization, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)/direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (DIPS), and combined procedure treatment. For the meta-analysis, 71 studies were identified by searching four databases. The individual studies’ samples were used to calculate a confidence interval (CI 95%), and data were pooled using a fixed-effect model and random effect model. The pooled measure and an equal-weighted average rate were calculated in all participant studies. Heterogeneity between the studies was assessed with I², and T² tests, and publication bias was estimated using Egger’s regression test. A total of 4,407 BCS patients had undergone an endovascular intervention procedure. The pooled results were 98.9% (95% CI 97.8‒98.9%) for a technical success operation, and 96.9% (95% CI 94.9‒98.9%) for a clinical success operation. The re-intervention rate after the initial intervention procedure was 18.9% (95% CI 14.7‒22.9%), and the survival rates at 1 and 5 years after the initial intervention procedure were 98.9% (95% CI 96.8‒98.9%) and 94.9% (95% CI 92.9‒96.9%), respectively. Patients receiving recanalization treatment (98%) had a better prognosis than those with a combined procedure (95.6%) and TIPS/DIPS treatment (94.5%). The systematic review and meta-analysis further solidify the role of endovascular intervention treatment in BCS as safe and effective. It maintains high technical and clinical success and long-term survival rates. The recanalization treatment had a better prognosis and outcome than the combined procedures and TIPS/DIPS treatment.

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for symptomatic hepatic vein-type Budd-Chiari syndrome: feasibility and long-term outcomes

For management of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS), a step-wise therapeutic approach starting with medical treatment, followed by endovascular recanalization, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, and finally liver transplantation has been adopted. We retrospectively analyzed 51 patients with symptomatic short segment (≤ 30 mm) hepatic vein (HV)-type BCS who underwent percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTBA) with/without stenting to determine the feasibility, clinical effectiveness, and long-term outcomes. The intervention was technically successful in 94.1% of cases (48/51)—32 patients underwent PTBA and 16 patients underwent HV stenting. Procedure-related complications occurred in 14 patients (29.1%). The clinical success rate at 4 weeks was 91.7% (44/48). Nine patients underwent reintervention, six patients due to restenosis/occlusion and three patients with clinical failure. The mean primary patency duration was 64.6 ± 19.9 months (CI, 58.5–70.8; range, 1.2–81.7 months). The cumulative 1-, 2-, and 5-year primary patency rates were 85.4, 74.5, and 58.3%, respectively. The cumulative 1-, 2-, and 5-year secondary patency rates were 93.8, 87.2, and 75%, respectively. The cumulative 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 97.9, 91.5, and 50%, respectively. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with and without stenting is effective and achieves excellent long-term patency and survival rates in patients with symptomatic HV-type BCS. With its lower incidence of re-occlusion and higher clinical success rate, HV angioplasty combined with stenting should be the preferred option especially in patients with segmental HV-type BCS.

North American Practice-Based Recommendations for Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts in Portal Hypertension

Complications of portal hypertension, including ascites, gastrointestinal bleeding, hepatic hydrothorax, and hepatic encephalopathy, are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite few high-quality randomized controlled trials to guide therapeutic decisions, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation has emerged as a crucial therapeutic option to treat complications of portal hypertension. In North America, the decision to perform TIPS involves gastroenterologists, hepatologists, and interventional radiologists, but TIPS creation is performed by interventional radiologists. This is in contrast to other parts of the world where TIPS creation is performed primarily by hepatologists. Thus, the successful use of TIPS in North America is dependent on a multidisciplinary approach and technical expertise, so as to optimize outcomes. Recently, new procedural techniques, TIPS stent technology, and indications for TIPS have emerged. As a result, practices and outcomes vary greatly across institutions and significant knowledge gaps exist. In this consensus statement, the Advancing Liver Therapeutic Approaches group critically reviews the application of TIPS in the management of portal hypertension. Advancing Liver Therapeutic Approaches convened a multidisciplinary group of North American experts from hepatology, interventional radiology, transplant surgery, nephrology, cardiology, pulmonology, and hematology to critically review existing literature and develop practice-based recommendations for the use of TIPS in patients with any cause of portal hypertension in terms of candidate selection, procedural best practices and, post-TIPS management; and to develop areas of consensus for TIPS indications and the prevention of complications. Finally, future research directions are identified related to TIPS for the management of portal hypertension.

Expanding Indications of TIPS in the Management of Portal Hypertension Complications

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a nonsurgical intervention to reduce portal pressure by creating a low-resistance channel between the portal and systemic circulations. It is a well-accepted treatment for gastroesophageal varices and refractory ascites. This review aims to discuss the evidence-based applications of TIPS in other complications of portal hypertension beyond gastroesophageal varices and refractory ascites.

25 years of experience with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): changes in patient selection and procedural aspects

Background

TIPS is an established treatment for portal hypertension. The aim was to analyze how patient selection for TIPS implantation and procedural aspects have changed over 25 years. Routinely collected demographic, clinical, laboratory, and procedural data of 835 patients treated with TIPS in a single center were used. Time trends over the observational period from 1993 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed.

Results

The most common indication for TIPS implantation has changed significantly from secondary prevention of variceal hemorrhage in the early years to treatment of recurrent ascites. During the observation period, increasingly more severely ill patients became TIPS candidates. There was little change in MELD scores over this period (in total median 13.00; IQR 10.00–18.00). The proportion of patients with Child–Pugh C cirrhosis increased. The most frequent underlying diseases in total were alcohol-related liver disease (66.5%) and viral hepatitis (11.9%). However, shares of cryptogenic liver cirrhosis, autoimmune hepatitis, and NASH increased over time. The proportion of patients post liver transplant also increased. While bare metal stents were standard in the past, use of covered stents increased. The success rate of TIPS (defined by successful implantation and a decrease in the portosystemic pressure gradient ≤ 12 mmHg) increased significantly over time. The total success rate according to this definition was 84.9%.

Conclusion

The results of our analysis reflect technical developments in TIPS, especially in terms of stent material and gains in clinical experience, particularly regarding indications and patient selection for TIPS implantation.

The Albumin-bilirubin Score Detects Changes in the Liver Function during Treatment for Budd-Chiari Syndrome: A Retrospective Observational Study

Objective Mapping the long-term prognosis of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is difficult, as the prognosis is associated with changes in the liver function. The present study evaluated the time course changes in the liver function in a treatment group with percutaneous old balloon angioplasty (POBA) and a non-treatment group using the albumin-bilirubin score (ALBI) and Child-Pugh score during long-term follow-up. Methods In this retrospective study, 13 consecutive patients diagnosed with BCS at our hospital between 2007 and 2020 were categorized into a treatment group (n=8), which received POBA, and a non-treatment group (n=5). Differences in the liver function in the ALBI and Child-Pugh scores between the initial visit and one- and three-year follow-up were calculated and statistically evaluated. We investigated the changes in the liver function during the long-term follow-up, including events such as re-stenosis and re-treatment. Results While the Child-Pugh scores in the treatment group did not differ significantly between the initial visit and 1- or 3-year follow-up, the ALBI scores in this group improved significantly between the initial visit and the 1- or 3-year follow-up visit (p=0.0078 and 0.0156, respectively). The liver function according to the ALBI score in the treatment group showed gradual improvement from the initial value but gradual worsening in the non-treatment group. The ALBI scores also revealed that the liver function varies according to re-stenosis and re-POBA in BCS patients. Conclusion Unlike the Child-Pugh score, the ALBI score was able to capture changes in the liver function of BCS patients during the long-term course of BCS.

Comparison of long-term outcomes of balloon angioplasty with or without stent placement for hepatic vein type Budd-Chiari syndrome

PURPOSE

To compare percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTBA) alone with PTBA plus stent placement for Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) patients with short-segmental obstruction of hepatic vein.

METHODS

Between May 2001 and December 2010, 91 hepatic vein type BCS patients (mean age, 32.8 ± 10.8; M:F ratio 50:41) were included and divided into two groups (PTBA alone, as group A, n = 48; PTBA plus stent, as group B, n = 43). The incidence of restenosis, long-term patency, and survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

All 91 patients were successfully treated with hepatic vein recanalization. During follow-up period (median 161 months, range: 84-234), group B had a significantly higher proportion of hepatic vein restenosis (56%, 24/43) than group A (33%, 16/48; P < 0.05). Cumulative primary patency rates at 1, 5, 10, 15 years were 96%, 81%, 69%, 65% and 91%, 60%, 47%, 47% in group A and group B, respectively (log-rank P < 0.05). Secondary technical success rates of target hepatic vein were 93% and 57% in group A and group B, respectively (P < 0.05). Clinical complete response rates were 94% and 86% in group A and group B, respectively (P > 0.05). The 15-year cumulative survival rates were 98% and 95% in group A and group B, respectively (P > 0.05). Major procedure-related complications occurred in 3 (3%) patients (1 in group A, 2 in group B).

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic vein recanalization is safe and efficient for hepatic vein type BCS patients with hepatic vein short segmental obstruction. Restenosis after hepatic vein stenting is more common and difficult to manage than that after hepatic vein balloon angioplasty alone.

Recanalization of accessory hepatic vein for hepatic vein-type Budd-Chiari syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and long-term outcomes associated with the treatment of hepatic vein (HV)-type Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) via accessory HV (AHV) recanalization.

METHODS

In total, 26 HV-type BCS patients underwent AHV recanalization between July 2014 and December 2019 at our hospital, while 73 HV-type BCS patients without compensatory AHV underwent main HV (MHV) recanalization and served as controls in the present study. Short- and long-term clinical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

AHV and MHV recanalization approaches were both associated with 100% technical success rates, with one recanalization procedure being performed per patient. Respective clinical success rates for the AHV and MHV recanalization approaches were 96.2% and 94.5% (P = 0.744). Re-obstruction rates were comparable between these two approaches at 20% and 34.8%, respectively (P = 0.17). Primary cumulative 1-, 2-, and 5-year patency rates in the AHV group were 96.0%, 91.6%, and 76.3%, respectively, whereas in the MHV group, these three respective rates were 87.0%, 78.6%, and 58.6% (P = 0.048). Secondary cumulative 1-, 2-, and 5-year patency rates in the AHV group were 96.0%, 96.0%, and 96.0%, respectively, whereas in the MHV group, they were 97.1%, 97.1%, and 81.8%, respectively (P = 0.289). Cumulative 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates for AHV group patients were 96.0%, 96.0%, and 96.0%, respectively, while for the MHV group, these respective rates were 98.6%, 95.2%, and 89.7% (P = 0.462).

CONCLUSION

HV-type BCS can be safely and effectively treated via AHV recanalization, which may achieve longer patency relative to MHV recanalization.

Budd-Chiari syndrome: consensus guidance of the Asian Pacific Association for the study of the liver (APASL)

Budd Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a diverse disease with regard to the site of obstruction, the predisposing thrombophilic disorders and clinical presentation across the Asia-Pacific region. The hepatic vein ostial stenosis and short segment thrombosis are common in some parts of Asia-Pacific region, while membranous obstruction of the vena cava is common in some and complete thrombosis of hepatic veins in others. Prevalence of myeloproliferative neoplasms and other thrombophilic disorders in BCS varies from region to region and with different sites of obstruction. This heterogeneity also raises several issues and dilemmas in evaluation and approach to management of a patient with BCS. The opportunity to recanalize hepatic vein in patients with hepatic vein ostial stenosis or inferior vena cava stenting or pasty among those membranous obstruction of the vena cava is a unique opportunity in the Asia-Pacific region to restore hepatic outflow closely mimicking physiology. In order to address these issues arising out of the diversity as well as the unique features in the region, the Asia Pacific Association for Study of Liver has formulated these guidelines for clinicians.

An Update on the Management of Budd-Chiari Syndrome

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is an uncommon condition, caused by obstruction to hepatic venous outflow. It is largely underdiagnosed, and a high index of suspicion is required for any patient with unexplained portal hypertension. The understanding of its etiology and pathology is improving with advances in diagnostic techniques. Recent studies reported an identifiable etiology in > 80% of cases. Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) is the most common etiology, and genetic studies help in diagnosing latent MPN. Better cross-sectional imaging helps delineate the site of obstruction accurately. The majority of BCS patients are now treated by endovascular intervention and anticoagulation which have improved survival in this disease. Angioplasty of hepatic veins/inferior vena cava remains under-utilized at present. While surgical porto-systemic shunts are no longer done for BCS, liver transplantation is reserved for select indications. Some of the unresolved issues in the current management of BCS are also discussed in this review.

Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Interventions in More than 500 patients with Budd-Chiari Syndrome

PURPOSE

To assess and compare the long-term outcomes of various endovascular interventions in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study, 510 consecutive patients with BCS who had undergone a total of 618 endovascular procedures from January 2001 to December 2019 were included. Details of the type of endovascular intervention, technical success, clinical success, patency rate, complications, and survival outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall technical success rate was 96% (593 of 618 procedures; 500 in treatment-naïve patients and 93 repeat interventions for recurrent disease). Endovascular procedures included recanalization procedures (angioplasty and stent placement) in 355 patients (71%) and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation in 145 (29%). Major postprocedure complications occurred in 14 patients (2.8%). Vascular/stent restenosis occurred in 95 patients (19%), and successful repeat intervention was performed in 82 of those 95 (86.3%). An additional 11 of these 82 (13.4%) underwent a third intervention for restenosis. In the recanalization and TIPS groups, the 1- and 5-y cumulative patency rates were 87% and 74% and 95% and 68%, respectively. The 1- and 5-y survival rates were 96% and 89% and 90% and 76%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular interventions for BCS are feasible and safe in the majority of patients, with excellent short- and long-term patency and survival rates.

Management of portal hypertension severe complications

Portal hypertension is a clinical syndrome characterized by an increase in the portal pressure gradient, defined as the gradient between the portal vein at the site downstream of the site of obstruction and the inferior vena cava. The most frequent cause of portal hypertension is cirrhosis. In patients with cirrhosis, portal hypertension is the main driver of cirrhosis progression and development of hepatic decompensation (ascites, variceal hemorrhage and hepatic encephalopathy), which defines the transition from compensated to decompensated stage. In decompensated patients, treatments aim at lowering the risk of death by preventing further decompensation and/or development of acute-on-chronic liver failure. Decompensated patients often pose a complex challenge which typically requires a multidisciplinary approach. The aims of the present review were to discuss the current knowledge regarding interventional treatments for patients with portal hypertension complications as well as to highlight useful information to aid hepatologists in their clinical practice. Specifically, we discussed the indications and contraindications of transjugular intra-hepatic portosystemic shunt and for the treatment of gastro-esophageal variceal hemorrhage in patients with decompensated cirrhosis (first section); we reviewed the use of interventional treatments in patients with hepatic vein obstruction (Budd-Chiari Syndrome) and in those with portal vein thrombosis (second section); and we briefly comment on the most frequent applications of selective splenic embolization in patients with and without underlying cirrhosis (third section).

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for Budd-Chiari syndrome: A comprehensive review

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a relatively rare clinical condition with a wide range of symptomatology, caused by the obstruction of the hepatic venous outflow. If left untreated, it has got an high mortality rate. Its management is based on a step-wise approach, depending on the clinical presentation, and includes different treatment from anticoagulation therapy up to Interventional Radiology techniques, such as transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). TIPS is today considered a safe and highly effective treatment and should be recommended for BCS patients, including those awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation. In this review the pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment options of BCS are presented, with a special focus on published data regarding the techniques and outcomes of TIPS for the treatment of BCS. Moreover, unresolved issues and future research will be discussed.

Anticoagulating Budd-Chiari syndrome patients presenting with variceal bleed: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

This aims to study incidence of re-bleeding on anticoagulation and survival of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) patients presenting with variceal bleeding.

METHODS

Budd-Chiari syndrome patients presenting with variceal bleed between 01/01/2007 and 01/05/2019 were retrospectively studied. Patients underwent endoscopic treatment ± endovascular therapy, followed by anticoagulation. Variceal re-bleed (on anticoagulation) and survival were studied.

RESULTS

Of 376 BCS patients diagnosed during the study period, 40 (10.7%) patients, presenting with variceal bleed (age 33 [25-40] years; male patients 70%; Rotterdam score 1.13 [0.63-1.22]), Group 1 were compared with 40 randomly selected age-matched BCS patients presenting with ascites, no bleeds (40 [23-42] years; male patients 42.5%; Rotterdam score 1.11 [1.09-1.16]), Group 2. The commonest site of obstruction was hepatic vein (65%) in Group 1 and combined hepatic veins and inferior vena cava (57.5%) in Group 2 (P < 0.01). Thirty-six Group 1 patients underwent endoscopic intervention (variceal ligation, 33; sclerotherapy, 2; glue injection, 1). Endovascular intervention was performed in 30 Group 1 patients (angioplasty ± stent, 22; endovascular shunt, 8) and in 34 Group 2 patients (angioplasty ± stent, 26; endovascular shunt, 8). All 80 patients were started on anticoagulation. Variceal bleed on anticoagulation occurred in five patients in Group 1 and three patients in Group 2. One-year and 5-year survival were 94.2% and 87.5%, respectively, in Group 1 and 100% and 80%, respectively, in Group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

About one-tenth of BCS patients present with variceal bleed. On management with endoscopic ± endovascular therapy, followed by anticoagulation, variceal re-bleed in these patients were comparable with those in BCS patients presenting with ascites and survival was excellent at 1 and 5 years.

Budd-Chiari Syndrome: An Uncommon Cause of Chronic Liver Disease that Cannot Be Missed

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS), or hepatic venous outflow obstruction, is a rare cause of liver disease that should not be missed. Variable clinical presentation among patients with BCS necessitates a high index of suspicion to avoid missing this life-threatening diagnosis. BCS is characterized as primary or secondary, depending on etiology of venous obstruction. Most patients with primary BCS have several contributing risk factors leading to a prothrombotic state. A multidisciplinary stepwise approach is integral in treating BCS. Lifelong anticoagulation is recommended. Long-term monitoring of patients for development of cirrhosis, complications of portal hypertension, hepatocellular carcinoma, and progression of underlying diseases is important.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt in the management of portal hypertension

These guidelines on transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPSS) in the management of portal hypertension have been commissioned by the Clinical Services and Standards Committee (CSSC) of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) under the auspices of the Liver Section of the BSG. The guidelines are new and have been produced in collaboration with the British Society of Interventional Radiology (BSIR) and British Association of the Study of the Liver (BASL). The guidelines development group comprises elected members of the BSG Liver Section, representation from BASL, a nursing representative and two patient representatives. The quality of evidence and grading of recommendations was appraised using the GRADE system. These guidelines are aimed at healthcare professionals considering referring a patient for a TIPSS. They comprise the following subheadings: indications; patient selection; procedural details; complications; and research agenda. They are not designed to address: the management of the underlying liver disease; the role of TIPSS in children; or complex technical and procedural aspects of TIPSS.

Usefulness of Venous Pressure Measurement in Endovascular Treatment of Budd-Chiari Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective Therapeutic predictors derived from the venous pressure before therapy have not been identified for Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS). The aim of this study was to determine whether or not measuring the distal pressure or pressure gradient was useful for predicting treatment efficacy in BCS. Methods We retrospectively analyzed seven consecutive patients diagnosed with symptomatic BCS at our hospital between 2008 and 2017. Distal and proximal venous pressures at occlusion sites of BCS were measured before treatment in all cases. The pressure gradient was defined as the difference between distal and proximal venous pressures. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed for venous pressures. Results Percutaneous old balloon angioplasty (POBA) was performed in seven cases, with technical success achieved in all cases (100%). No complications were encountered. The median primary patency was 574 (interquartile range, 439.5-1,056.5) days. The 1-year primary patency rate was 71.73%. Six cases (85.7%) showed resolution of symptoms, representing clinical success. The ROC analysis revealed a high distal pressure (area under the ROC curve = 0.83, cut-off=12 mmHg) as a predictor of treatment efficacy of POBA for symptomatic BCS. In addition, the pressure gradient was considered significant from a clinical perspective, because the 6 successful cases with resolution of symptoms showed a large pressure gradient (range, 8-21 mmHg) before treatment, whereas the failed case showed a relatively small pressure gradient (7 mmHg). Conclusion High distal pressure and a large pressure gradient might predict the treatment efficacy of balloon angioplasty for symptomatic BCS.

Review article: a multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis and management of Budd-Chiari syndrome

BACKGROUND

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a rare but fatal disease caused by obstruction in the hepatic venous outflow tract.

AIM

To provide an update of the pathophysiology, aetiology, diagnosis, management and follow-up of BCS.

METHODS

Analysis of recent literature by using Medline, PubMed and EMBASE databases.

RESULTS

Primary BCS is usually caused by thrombosis and is further classified into "classical BCS" type where obstruction occurs within the hepatic vein and "hepatic vena cava BCS" which involves thrombosis of the intra/suprahepatic portion of the inferior vena cava (IVC). BCS patients often have a combination of prothrombotic risk factors. Aetiology and presentation differ between Western and certain Asian countries. Myeloproliferative neoplasms are present in 35%-50% of European patients and are usually associated with the JAK2-V617F mutation. Clinical presentation is diverse and BCS should be excluded in any patient with acute or chronic liver disease. Non-invasive imaging (Doppler ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging) usually provides the diagnosis. Liver biopsy should be obtained if small vessel BCS is suspected. Stepwise management strategy includes anticoagulation, treatment of identified prothrombotic risk factors, percutaneous revascularisation and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt to re-establish hepatic venous drainage, and liver transplantation in unresponsive patients. This strategy provides a 5-year survival rate of nearly 90%. Long-term outcome is influenced by any underlying haematological condition and development of hepatocellular carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

With the advent of newer treatment strategies and improved understanding of BCS, outcomes in this rare disease have improved over the last three decades. An underlying haematological disorder can be the major determinant of outcome.

Diastolic dysfunction on echocardiography does not predict survival after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Cardiac dysfunction is frequently observed in patients with cirrhosis. There remains a paucity of data from routine clinical practice regarding the role of echocardiography in the pre-assessment of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt.

AIM

Our study aimed to investigate if echocardiography parameters predict outcomes after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt insertion in cirrhosis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent echocardiography and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt insertion at the liver unit (Birmingham, UK) between 1999 and 2016 were included. All echocardiography measures (including left ventricle ejection fraction; early maximal ventricular filling/late filling velocity ratio, diastolic dysfunction as per British Society of Echocardiography guidelines) were independently reviewed by a cardiologist. Predictors of 30-day and overall transplant free-survival were assessed.

RESULTS

One Hundred and Seventeen patients with cirrhosis (median age 56 years; 54% alcohol; Child-Pugh B/C 71/14.5%; Model For End-Stage Liver Disease 12) underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt for ascites (n = 78) and variceal haemorrhage (n = 39). Thirty-day and overall transplant-free survival was 90% (n = 105) and 31% (n = 36), respectively, over a median 663 (IQR 385-2368) days follow-up. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (P < 0.001) and Child-Pugh Score (P = 0.002) significantly predicted 30-day and overall transplant-free survival. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease ≥15 implied three-fold risk of death. Six per cent (n = 7) of patients pre-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt had a history of ischaemic heart disease and 34% (n = 40) had 1 or more cardiovascular disease risk factors. Fifty per cent (n = 59) had an abnormal echocardiogram and 33% (n = 39) had grade 1-3 diastolic dysfunction. On univariate analysis none of the echocardiography measures pre-intervention were related to 30-day or overall transplant-free survival post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt.

CONCLUSIONS

Ventricular, in particular diastolic dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis does not predict survival after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt insertion. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and Child-Pugh scores remain the best predictors of survival. Further prospective study is required to clarify the role of routine echocardiography prior to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt insertion.

Long Term Survival of Patients Undergoing TIPS in Budd-Chiari Syndrome

BACKGROUND

There has been significant improvement in understanding the etiology and management of Budd-Chiari Syndrome (BCS). Patients with chronic or acute-on-chronic BCS need radiological interventions in the form of angioplasty, hepatic vein/inferior vena cava stenting or Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS). Data regarding the long term follow up of patients undergoing TIPS is limited. We thus prospectively followed-up BCS patients who underwent TIPS at our center.

METHODS

This study included 42 patients with BCS who underwent TIPS with a covered stent between 2004 and 2014. We analyzed the etiology, symptoms, severity, laboratory parameters and imaging pre and post TIPS. All patients underwent surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma.

RESULTS

Patients demographics included 26 males and 16 females with a mean age of 40.5 years (19-68 years). The mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of the entire cohort was 15.38 (range: 9-25). Thirty-four patients were grouped into Rotterdam Class 2 and remaining into Class 3. There was significant improvement in ascites, gastrointestinal bleed, renal function and transaminase levels post TIPS. There were 11 deaths over the follow-up period - 4 within one month, 2 within six months and the rest after 3 years following TIPS. Median duration from clinical presentation to TIPS was 2.1 weeks and median survival till follow-up was 45.5 months (0-130 months). 33/42 patients underwent TIPS prior to 2013, and their median survival till follow-up was 55 months. Six out of eleven deaths that occurred within six months post-TIPS were before 2006; when the technique of TIPS creation was evolving. The cumulative 1 year, 5 years and 10 years OLT-free survival was 86%, 81% and 76%, respectively. Two patients underwent a liver transplant at 4 and 7 years after TIPS.

CONCLUSION

Our results validate the role of TIPS in the management of patients with BCS. With the accessibility of TIPS, the requirement for liver transplantation has become rare.

Tei index is associated with survival in cirrhosis patients treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

BACKGROUND

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is the method of choice for the treatment of portal hypertension. The Tei index is the most sensitive indicator of myocardial function.

DESIGN

This study enrolled 31 patients with cirrhosis who underwent TIPS and were followed up over a median period of 34 months (range 2-60 months). Baseline Meld score and the changes in the Tei index within 1 month after TIPS and their potential relationship with prognosis were evaluated. The primary endpoint was mortality.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (42%) died during follow-up. Survival analysis showed that the pre-TIPS Tei index (RR = -7.660, 95% confidence interval 0.000-0.069, P < 0.05) and the baseline MELD score > 10 (RR = 0.305,95% CI:1.036-1.778, P < 0.05) were significantly associated with survival rate after TIPS.

CONCLUSION

The Tei index before TIPS is associated with the survival of patients with cirrhosis after TIPS, and is potentially a predictive factor of mortality.

Outcomes of endovascular interventional therapy for primary Budd-Chiari syndrome caused by hepatic venous obstruction

To date, interventional therapy for patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) due to hepatic vein obstruction (HVO) has not been standardized in China. In Western countries, BCS primarily occurs due to thrombosis and the majority of patients receive thrombolysis. In China, BCS is mostly caused by the membranous occlusion of the HV or IVC. The present retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of recanalization techniques in patients with primary BCS due to HVO. The data of 69 patients with BCS due to HVO, who underwent endovascular therapy at 2 centers in China between December 2010 and December 2012, were analyzed. All of the patients underwent balloon angioplasty. In addition, 14, 6 and 5 patients received thrombolysis, endovascular stent and thrombolysis + endovascular stent, respectively. The overall technical success rate was 95.7% (66/69), and was comparable among the treatments. The HV pressure after the treatments was significantly lower compared with that prior to the procedures (23.3±6.9 vs. 46.5±8.6 cmH₂O; P<0.001). The mean follow-up duration was 75 months (range, 60–84 months). During the 5-year follow-up, 10 patients (15.2%) had developed a recurrence of BCS-associated symptoms, of which 7 were successfully treated. The cumulative survival rates at 12, 36 and 60 months after endovascular interventional therapy (balloon angioplasty or combined treatment) were 98.5, 98.5 and 93.9%, respectively. After treatment by endovascular therapy, the patients with BCS caused by HVO had high survival rates and low recurrence rates in the short- and mid-term.

Timing of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Stent-shunt in Budd-Chiari Syndrome: A UK Hepatologist's Perspective

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a rare but fatal disease caused by the obstruction in hepatic venous outflow tract (usually by thrombosis) and is further classified into two subtypes depending on the level of obstruction. Patients with BCS often have a combination of prothrombotic risk factors. Clinical presentation is diverse. Stepwise management strategy has been suggested with excellent 5-year survival rate. It includes anticoagulation, treatment of identified prothrombotic risk factor, percutaneous recanalization, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) to reestablish hepatic venous outflow and liver transplantation in unresponsive patients. Owing to the rarity of BCS, there are no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) precisely identifying the timing for TIPS. TIPS should be considered in patients with refractory ascites, variceal bleed, and fulminant liver failure. Liver replacement is indicated in patients with progressive liver failure and in those in whom TIPS is not technically possible. The long-term outcome is usually influenced by the underlying hematologic condition and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. This review focuses on the timing and the long-term efficacy of TIPS in patients with BCS.

Image-guided treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome: a giant leap from the past, a small step towards the future

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a relatively rare vascular disease characterized by hepatic outflow tract obstruction, and image-guided endovascular treatment, namely percutaneous angioplasty, stenting, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), has proven to be effective treatment modalities to alleviate symptoms and markedly improve the prognosis of the disease. Specifically, a step-wise approach is recommended, i.e., angioplasty and stenting are the prioritized choice for patients with membranous obstruction and short-length stenosis, whereas TIPS is the option for patients who fail this treatment. Currently, 5-year survival with the step-wise approach is about 75%, and the most promising way to further improve this value is to identify candidates who are at high risk of failing angioplasty, and perform pre-emptive TIPS in these patients.

Endovascular treatment for hepatic vein-type Budd-Chiari syndrome: effectiveness and long-term outcome

PURPOSE

To determine the clinical effectiveness and long-term outcomes of endovascular treatment for hepatic vein (HV)-type Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From June 2011 to August 2016, 68 consecutive patients with symptomatic HV-type BCS underwent endovascular treatment in our center. Data on the baseline characteristics, technical success, clinical success, and long-term outcomes were collected and analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The technical success rate of endovascular treatment was 100%. Fifty patients underwent HV recanalization, and 18 underwent accessory HV (AHV) recanalization. The clinical success rate was 95.6% (65/68). During a mean follow-up period of 29.4 ± 13.6 months, 19 patients experienced re-obstruction of either the HV (n = 18) or the AHV (n = 1). The cumulative 1-, 2-, and 5-year primary patency rates were 80.0, 72.8, and 67.9%, respectively. The cumulative 1-, 2-, and 5-year secondary patency rates were 93.8, 90.3, and 82.9%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that the independent predictor of a prolonged primary patency duration was recanalization of the AHV. Five patients died 1-28 months (median, 15 months) after treatment. The cumulative 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 96.9, 93.4, and 91.2%, respectively. There was no significant difference in survival between the HV and AHV recanalization groups.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular treatment is effective for patients with HV-type BCS. It can result in excellent long-term patency and survival rates. If it is applicable, AHV recanalization should be considered prior to treatment in order to achieve a longer patency.

Role of radiological imaging and interventions in management of Budd-Chiari syndrome

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a clinical condition resulting from impaired hepatic venous drainage, in which there is obstruction to the hepatic venous outflow at any level from the small hepatic veins to the junction of the inferior vena cava and the right atrium leading to hepatic congestion. The diagnosis of BCS is based on imaging, which can be gathered from non-invasive investigations such as ultrasonography coupled with venous Doppler, triphasic computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Apart from diagnosis, various interventional radiology procedures aid in the successful management of this syndrome. In this article, we present various imaging features of BCS along with various interventional procedures that are used to treat this diverse condition.

Polytetrafluoroethylene-Covered Stent Graft Versus Bare Stent in Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) is used to control refractory variceal bleeding secondary to portal hypertension. This meta-analysis was conducted to systematically review polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent grafts (CS) versus bare stents (BS) in TIPS procedure.

METHODS

Systematic search of literature databases was done from January-1990 till April-2017, using predecided keywords. Outcome measures studied were (1) primary-patency (PP) at 1 year (defined as absence of shunt insufficiency at 1 year), (2) rebleeding (RE) (3) new-onset hepatic encephalopathy ([HE] new-onset or worsening encephalopathy following the procedure), and (4) survival at 1 year (SU). Odds ratio (OR) was calculated for each outcome variable. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed by the I² statistics and χ² Q-test.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies (4 RCTs, 2 prospective nonrandomized, and 8 retrospective) were included with 2519 patients (1548 patients in BS group and 971 patients in CS group). Three-quarter outcome measures showed significantly better results with CS. PP was pooled from 13 studies and showed an OR = 4.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.32-6.79; P < .00001; I² = 44%) in favor of CS. RE was pooled from six studies with odds ratio (OR) = 0.37(95% CI = 0.24-0.56; P < .00001; I² = 0%) in favor of CS. SU was pooled from 11 studies with OR = 1.85 (95% CI = 1.44-2.38; P < .00001; I² = 0%) in favor of CS. On subset analysis for RCTs, three outcome variables favored CS with minimal heterogeneity [PP: OR = 4.18 (95% CI = 2.66-6.55; P < .00001; I² = 0%). RE: OR = 0.43 (95% CI = 0.25-0.72; P < .001; I² = 0%). SU: OR = 1.85 (95% CI = 1.44-2.38, P < .00001; I² = 0%)]. HE showed no difference between two stents on the overall and subset pooled analysis. Overall: OR = 0.86 (95% CI = 0.68-1.08; P = .19; I² = 4%). Only RCTs: OR = 0.91 (95% CI = 0.63-1.32, P = .63; I² = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

CS is associated with better primary patency and survival and lesser rate of rebleeding than BS in patients undergoing TIPS procedure. There is no difference in new-onset hepatic encephalopathy.

Timing of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for Budd-Chiari Syndrome: An Italian Hepatologist's Perspective

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) management flow-chart is derived from experts' opinion and is not evidence-based. Guidelines suggest BCS management should follow a stepwise strategy: medical therapy as first-line treatment, revascularization or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) if no response to medical therapy, and liver transplant as rescue therapy. Recent evidence suggests that only medical therapy results in a bad long-term outcome. The biggest criticism of guidelines is the indication that BCS should receive further treatment only when hemodynamic consequences of portal hypertension become clinically evident. Recent data support that in BCS liver fibrosis could arise from chronic microvascular ischemia. A reasoning model of BCS physiopathology is that impaired hepatic vein outflow has hemodynamic consequences on portal hypertension development and causes hepatic fibrosis and liver failure through chronic ischemic damage. On this assumption is the concept that relieving liver congestion could ameliorate liver function and prevent development of BCS complications. Recently, early interventional treatment with TIPS for BCS has been reported to be effective. Early TIPS seems to be the best option for BCS management. Future multicenter controlled studies should compare the outcome of BCS treated with early interventional treatment compared with stepwise strategy.

Austrian consensus guidelines on the management and treatment of portal hypertension (Billroth III)

The Billroth III guidelines were developed during a consensus meeting of the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (ÖGGH) and the Austrian Society of Interventional Radiology (ÖGIR) held on 18 February 2017 in Vienna. Based on international guidelines and considering recent landmark studies, the Billroth III recommendations aim to help physicians in guiding diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in patients with portal hypertension.

Long-term outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in Indian patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome

BACKGROUND/AIM

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is the treatment of choice in Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) based on current data. Our objective was to evaluate outcomes and assess prognostic factors in BCS patients undergoing TIPS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective analysis of a propectively maintained database, all consecutive BCS patients undergoing TIPS from September 2010 to February 2017 were included. Complete response after TIPS was defined as resolution of symptoms (ascites/pedal edema) with no requirement of diuretics at the end of 4 weeks. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to assess predictors of outcome and complications.

RESULTS

Eighty patients with BCS who underwent TIPS were included; 40 (50%) were male. The mean age at onset of symptoms was 24.2±8.7 years. The median (range) follow-up was 660 (2-2400) days. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year rates for TIPS stent patency were 89, 81, and 81%, respectively. Cumulative encephalopathy-free rates were 91, 86, and 86%, respectively, and survival rates were 93, 89, and 84%, respectively. Eight (10.0%) patients died during follow-up, five within the first year (three of these five had incomplete response). On univariate analysis, serum bilirubin, response to intervention, serum creatinine, Child class, model for end-stage liver disease, and All India Institute of Medical Sciences-hepatic venous outflow tract obstruction score were significantly different between survivors and nonsurvivors. On multivariate analysis, response to therapy after TIPS (hazard ratio: 8.37; 95% confidence interval: 1.60-43.82) was independently associated with mortality. The 1-year survival was 97% in patients with complete response, compared with 59% in those with incomplete response (P<0.004).

CONCLUSION

Incomplete symptom response after TIPS is associated with poor outcome and can be used for selection of patients for liver transplantation.

Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Child with Budd-Chiari Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma is an uncommon complication described in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome.

CASE CHARACTERISTICS

A 12-year-old boy with Budd-Chiari syndrome, who was earlier treated with Transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt (TIPS), presented with acute onset hemoperitoneum and hypotension.

OUTCOME

It was diagnosed to be a case of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma.

MESSAGE

Successful TIPS may not prevent the development of hepatocellular carcinoma, and children with Budd Chiari syndrome should be monitored for the same.

Budd-Chiari syndrome/hepatic venous outflow tract obstruction

BACKGROUND

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a rare disease characterized by hepatic venous outflow tract obstruction (HVOTO).

METHODS

Recent literature has been analyzed for this narrative review.

RESULTS

Primary BCS/HVOTO is a result of thrombosis. The same patient often has multiple risk factors for venous thrombosis and most have at least one. Presentation and etiology may differ between Western and certain Eastern countries. Myeloproliferative neoplasms are present in 40% of patients and are usually associated with the V617F-JAK2 mutation in myeloid cells, in particular peripheral blood granulocytes. Presentation and symptoms vary, thus this diagnosis must be considered in any patient with acute or chronic liver disease. Doppler ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging of the hepatic veins and inferior vena cava usually successfully provide noninvasive identification of the obstruction or its consequences in the collaterals of hepatic veins or the inferior vena cava. The reported life expectancy in these patients is 3 years after the first symptoms. The therapeutic strategy includes first, anticoagulation, correction of risk factors, diuretics, and prophylaxis for portal hypertension, then angioplasty for short-length venous stenosis followed by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and finally liver transplantation. The progression of treatment is based on the response to therapy at each step. This strategy results in a 5-year survival rate of nearly 85%. The medium-term prognosis depends upon the severity of liver disease, and the long-term outcome can be jeopardized by transformation of underlying conditions and hepatocellular carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

BCS/HVOTO hepatic manifestations of BCS/HVOTO can be controlled in most patients with medical or radiological interventions. Underlying disease has become the major determinant of patient outcome.

Diagnosis and treatment guidelines for aberrant portal hemodynamics: The Aberrant Portal Hemodynamics Study Group supported by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan

Idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH), causing aberrant portal hemodynamics, is a disease with an as yet unidentified cause and no established treatment protocol. The Japanese research group on IPH in Japan was set up in 1975 by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. Extrahepatic portal obstruction and Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) have since been added to the group's research subjects. The aims of the research group are to accurately evaluate the current status of the three diseases in Japan, elucidate their etiology and pathogenesis, and develop new treatments. Due to the long-term efforts of the Japanese research group, aberrant portal hemodynamics has been investigated in a variety of aspects, from epidemiological and pathological studies to molecular biology analyses. As a result, it has been shown that there are abnormal genes in the liver, specific for IPH. In addition, pathological findings of BCS were internationally compared and the difference in findings between Japan and Europe (or North America) has been clarified. Furthermore, it was found that complication rates of hepatocellular carcinoma in BCS were higher in Japan. Based on the research, "Diagnosis and treatment of aberrant portal hemodynamics (2001)", including diagnostic criteria for aberrant portal hemodynamics, was published in 2001. In 2013, it was revised to "Diagnosis and treatment guidelines for aberrant portal hemodynamics (2013)" after the incorporation of diagnosis and treatment in accordance with its current status.

Experience of Liver Transplant in Patients Diagnosed with Budd-Chiari Syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Budd-Chiari syndrome can lead to fulminant hepatic failure and cirrhosis. The treatment depends on the severity of disease. Liver transplant is a successful treatment option for those with advanced-stage disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, we analyzed all liver transplants conducted for Budd-Chiari syndrome at the organ transplant unit of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran, from 1993 to January 2016. Overall, 3201 liver transplant procedures were performed. Among these, 68 presented with Budd-Chiari syndrome.

RESULTS

The median age was 31 years among 27 male and 41 female patients. Five patients received pretransplant interventions, with 2 treated with inferior vena cava stenting and 3 having transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Sixty-five patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome received deceased-donor grafts and 3 received living-donor grafts. Among the Budd-Chiari transplant patients, 6 patients died. Five deaths occurred in the early posttransplant period, and 1 patient retransplanted after 2 years for recurrence of disease died due to graft failure. The five-year survival rate was 89% among patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplant along with posttransplant anticoagulation therapy can improve the survival of patients with advanced-stage Budd-Chiari syndrome.

Long-term outcomes following percutaneous hepatic vein recanalization for Budd-Chiari syndrome

BACKGROUND & AIMS

A proportion of patients with Budd-Chiari Syndrome (BCS) associated with stenosis or short occlusion of the hepatic vein (HV) or upper inferior vena cava (IVC) can be treated with recanalization by percutaneous venoplasty ± HV stent insertion. We studied the long-term outcomes of this approach.

METHODS

Single-centre retrospective analysis of patients referred for radiological assessment ± intervention over a 27-year period. Of 155 BCS patients, 63 patients who underwent venoplasty were studied and compared to a previously reported series treated by TIPSS (n = 59).

RESULTS

Patients treated with HV interventions (32 venoplasty alone, 31 endovascular stents): mean age, 34.9 ± 10.9; M:F ratio 27:36; median follow-up, 113.0 months; 62% of patients had ≥1 haematological risk factor. Technical success was 100%, with symptom resolution in 73%. Cumulative secondary patency at 1, 5, 10 years was 92%, 79%, 79% and 69%, 69%, 64% in the stenting and venoplasty groups respectively. Where long-term patency was not achieved, 10 patients required TIPSS, and 8 underwent surgery. Actuarial survival at 1, 5, 10 years was 97%, 89% and 85%. When compared to TIPSS, HV interventions resulted in similar patency and survival rates but significantly lower procedural complications (9.5% vs 27.1%) and hepatic encephalopathy (0% vs 18%). Patient age predicted survival following multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support the stepwise approach to management of BCS, with very good outcomes from venoplasty combined with stenting when required. TIPSS should only be offered where HV interventions are not feasible or unsuccessful.

Review article: the aetiology of primary Budd-Chiari syndrome - differences between the West and China

BACKGROUND

China may have the largest number of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) cases in the world (at least 1914 original papers were published, and at least 20 191 BCS patients were reported). Considering the discrepancy in the clinical profiles and preferred treatment selection of primary BCS between the West and China, understanding its aetiology in these two different regions is very important.

AIM

To review the data from large cohort studies and meta-analyses to illustrate the epidemiology of risk factors for BCS in the West and China.

METHODS

Relevant papers were identified by major English- and Chinese-language databases, conference abstracts, and by manual search.

RESULTS

Risk factors reviewed include myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and their related gene mutations, anti-phospholipid syndrome, paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH), hyperhomocysteinaemia and 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T mutation, factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin G20210A mutations, inherited anti-thrombin, protein C and protein S deficiencies, pregnancy and puerperium, poverty, and family history.

CONCLUSIONS

We examined the differences in the aetiological distribution of BCS between the West and China. Several recommendations should be considered in Chinese BCS patients: (i) screening for hyperhomocysteinaemia and MTHFR mutation should be regularly performed; (ii) screening for MPNs, PNH, and anti-phospholipid syndrome should be selectively performed; (iii) inherited anti-thrombin, protein C, and protein S deficiencies should be actively explored; (iv) screening for FVL and prothrombin G20210A mutations may be unnecessary; and (v) the clinical significance of pregnancy and puerperium, poverty with bacterial infections and unsanitary environments, and family history as possible risk factors should never be neglected.