Review article: consensus statements on therapeutic drug monitoring of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy in inflammatory bowel diseases

Management of Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease

Perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (CD) represents a severe phenotype of CD that is associated with significant morbidity and reduction in quality of life. Perianal fistulizing CD is caused by a complex interplay of genetic predisposition, immune dysregulation, gut dysbiosis, and various unknown physiological and mechanical factors. A multidisciplinary approach is hence required for optimal management . A detailed anatomical description and classification of perianal fistula, including comprehensive clinical, endoscopic, and radiological diagnostic workup, is an important prerequisite to treatment. For simple perianal fistulas, use of antibiotics and immunomodulators, with or without fistulotomy, are appropriate measures. The medical management of complex perianal fistula, on the other hand, requires adequate control of infection before initiation of therapy with immunomodulators. In active complex perianal fistula, anti-tumor necrosis factors remain the most accepted therapy, with concomitant use of antibiotics or immunomodulators enhancing the efficacy. For patients refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factors, treatment with anti-integrins, anti-interleukins, and small molecules is being evaluated. Mesenchymal stem cells, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and exclusive enteral nutrition have also been investigated as adjunct therapies. Despite the expansion of the medical armamentarium, a large proportion of the patients require surgical interventions. In this review, we provide an up-to-date overview of the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and medical management of perianal fistulizing CD. A brief overview of the surgical management of perianal fistulizing CD is also provided.

Impact of HLA-DQA1*05 Genotype in Immunogenicity and Failure to Treatment with Tumour Necrosis Factor-alpha Antagonists in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

HLA-DQA1*05 carriage has been associated with an increased risk of immunogenicity in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases treated with tumour necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-a] antagonists. Results have shown an inconsistent association with a loss of response [LOR] in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], which could be modified when using proactive optimisation and association with immunomodulatory drugs.

AIMS

To define the association of HLA-DQA1*05 on anti-drug antibody development and loss of response [LOR] to anti-TNF-a in IBD.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and SCOPUS, for the period up to August 2023, to identify studies reporting the risk of immunogenicity and/or LOR in IBD patients with HLA-DQA1*05 genotype.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies comprising 12 papers, 11 abstracts and one research letter, with a total of 5727 IBD patients, were included. In a meta-analysis of 10 studies [2984 patients; 41.9% with HLA-DQA1*05 genotype], HLA-DQA1*05 carriers had higher risk of immunogenicity compared with non-carriers (risk ratio, 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23 - 1.94; I2 = 62%) [low certainty evidence]. Lack of therapeutic drug monitoring [TDM] increased immunogenicity in the presence of risk human leukocyte antigen [HLA] [risk ratio 1.97; 95% CI, 1.35 - 2.88; I2 = 66%], whereas proactive TDM revoked this association [very low certainty of evidence]. A meta-analysis of six studies [765 patients] found that risk for secondary LOR was higher among HLA-DQA1*05 carriers [hazard ratio 2.21; 95% CI, 1.69 - 2.88; I2 = 0%] [very low certainty evidence], although definition and time to assessment varied widely among studies.

CONCLUSION

HLA-DQA1*05 carriage may be associated with an increased risk of immunogenicity and secondary LOR in IBD patients treated with TNF-a antagonists.

Fluorescence-Based Lateral Flow Immunoassay for Quantification of Infliximab: Analytical and Clinical Performance Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab (IFX) can improve treatment outcomes; however, the temporal gap between drug concentration monitoring and subsequent availability restricts its practical application. To address this issue, an automated monitoring method, AFIAS IFX, was developed to rapidly and accurately analyze IFX concentration in blood. The analytical and clinical performances of this method were assessed to establish its clinical utility.

METHODS

The analytical performance of AFIAS IFX was evaluated according to Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines. For clinical validation, AFIAS IFX was compared with 3 established enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (LISA TRACKER, RIDASCREEN, and ImmunoGuide) using 100 consecutive samples from 28 patients treated with IFX. Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analyses were performed to compare the methods.

RESULTS

The detection and quantification limits of AFIAS IFX were 0.12 and 0.20 mcg/mL, respectively. Furthermore, AFIAS IFX analyzed samples within 10 minutes for concentrations up to 50 mcg/mL, exhibiting reproducibility (coefficient of variation [CV] ≤7.8%) and accuracy (recovery 98%-101%) with serum, plasma, and whole blood samples. Clinically, it exhibited a good correlation with the 3 established enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. For patients treated with Remicade (IFX), the Passing-Bablok regression slope was 1.001-1.259, with a mean difference of -1.48 to 0.28 mcg/mL. For patients treated with CT-P13, the Passing-Bablok regression slope was 0.974-1.254, with a mean difference of -2.44 to 0.15 mcg/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

AFIAS IFX, a novel fluorescence-based lateral flow assay, exhibited excellent performance in analyzing IFX trough levels and is a potentially powerful tool for therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical settings, with opportunities for further development.

Letter: Persisting with persistence-A caution as an outcome measure in inflammatory bowel disease: Authors' reply

This article is linked to Yiu et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18006 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18114

What are the benefits of therapeutic drug monitoring in the optimization of adalimumab therapy? a systematic review and meta-analysis up to 2022

Aims

Persistent uncertainties exist surrounding the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of adalimumab in clinical settings. To address these issues, we conducted a systematic review to assess the current evidence regarding the benefits of TDM for adalimumab.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Databases were searched from inception to October 2022. The trials regarding to the list three key questions were considered: 1) Could routine proactive TDM assist in improving outcomes in patients receiving adalimumab? 2) Could reactive TDM assist in guiding subsequent treatment strategies for patients with treatment failure to adalimumab? 3) Could TDM assist in informing dose reduction or discontinuation in patients with low disease activity or in remission treated with adalimumab? Two reviewers independently selected the studies and extracted the data. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

A total of 9 studies was included in this review. For proactive TDM, meta-analysis indicated that proactive TDM (n = 163/257, 63.42%) showed no significant superiority over reactive TDM and/or conventional management (n = 336/606, 55.44%) in achieving and/or maintaining clinical remission by random effects model (RR: 1.24, 95% CI 0.98-1.58, I 2 = 73%). There were three studies that supporting the reactive TDM, low drug levels in the absence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) strongly indicate the need for dose intensification, and infliximab is a feasible choice for patients with low drug levels and ADA positivity. While swapping to another class should be considered in patients with adequate drug levels. In addition, TDM can help clinicians optimize dosing schedules and prevent overtreatment in patients who have achieved low disease activity and sufficient drug concentrations, with no predictive value for successful adalimumab discontinuation.

Conclusion

Current evidence suggests that proactive TDM is numerically but not statistically significant superiority over reactive TDM and/or conventional management. Reactive TDM can aid in understanding treatment failure and developing subsequent therapy. For patients reaching low disease activity and remission, TDM can help successful dose reduction, while it cannot inform the successful drug discontinuation. However, existing trials are limited, and more well-designed trials are necessary to clarify the role of TDM in adalimumab treatment.

Biomarkers predicting the effect of anti-TNF treatment in paediatric and adult inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVES

Paediatric and adult inflammatory bowel disease (pIBD, aIBD) patients may lose response to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) treatment within the first year. Adult-extrapolated weight-based dosing is incorrect in children, due to age-related pharmacokinetic differences. We investigated biomarkers for initial and maintenance of response to infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA), comparing pIBD and aIBD patients.

METHODS

In this prospective, observational study, pIBD (n = 24) and aIBD (n = 21) patients were included when initiating anti-TNF. Escalation from standard dosing and continued anti-TNF at 12 and 18 months were assessed. Biomarkers included clinical laboratory parameters, faecal calprotectin (FCP) and IFX trough levels (TLs). Plasma proteomics was performed in pIBD.

RESULTS

During our study, treatment escalation (in clinical loss of response) occurred more common in pIBD versus aIBD (p = 0.02). We established that IFX therapy escalation in pIBD patients was not due to low infliximab levels. We identified 9 pro-inflammatory proteins that were elevated in patients losing response.

CONCLUSION

Anti-TNF exposure-response relationship may be different in pIBD versus aIBD. No biomarkers for maintained response were identified, but 9 inflammatory proteins were of interest as potential predictors for loss of response in pIBD.

Reactive Immunomodulator Addition to Infliximab Monotherapy Restores Clinical Response in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving infliximab (IFX) commonly experience immunogenic loss of response (LOR) by formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). An immunomodulator (IMM) used in combination with initial IFX induction is known to reduce ADA development and improve clinical outcomes. We aimed to assess the impact of reactively adding an IMM to patients on IFX monotherapy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study and systematic review with meta-analysis of patients with IBD demonstrating immunologic LOR, with or without clinical LOR, that had an IMM (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, or methotrexate) reactively added (reactive combination therapy; rCT) to combat elevated ADAs and raise IFX level. Data were extracted for pooled effect size estimation using random-effects models, and ADA and IFX trough levels were compared pre- and post-IMM initiation.

RESULTS

We identified 6 patients who received rCT due to rising ADA titers and low IFX levels. Median ADA titer decreased from 506 ng/mL (interquartile range (IQR) [416-750]) to 76.5 ng/mL (IQR [25.8-232]), an 85% decrease (p = 0.031). Median IFX trough increased from 0.4 µg/mL (IQR [0.4-0.48]) to 8.25 µg/mL (IQR [3.7-9.6]), a 20.6-fold increase (p = 0.038). Meta-analysis pooled effect size of 7 studies with 89 patients showed an 87% ADA titer reduction [95% confidence interval (CI) = 72-94%], 6.7-fold increased IFX trough (95% CI = 2.4-18.7), and 76% clinical remission rescue rate (95% CI = 59-93%).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest rCT is a valid rescue strategy in patients with immunogenic LOR to IFX to reduce ADA titers, restore therapeutic IFX levels, and recapture clinical remission of IBD.

Best Practice for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab: Position Statement from the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology

BACKGROUND

Infliximab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody, has revolutionized the pharmacological management of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). This position statement critically reviews and examines existing data on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab in patients with IMIDs. It provides a practical guide on implementing TDM in current clinical practices and outlines priority areas for future research.

METHODS

The endorsing TDM of Biologics and Pharmacometrics Committees of the International Association of TDM and Clinical Toxicology collaborated to create this position statement.

RESULTS

Accumulating data support the evidence for TDM of infliximab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases, with limited investigation in other IMIDs. A universal approach to TDM may not fully realize the benefits of improving therapeutic outcomes. Patients at risk for increased infliximab clearance, particularly with a proactive strategy, stand to gain the most from TDM. Personalized exposure targets based on therapeutic goals, patient phenotype, and infliximab administration route are recommended. Rapid assays and home sampling strategies offer flexibility for point-of-care TDM. Ongoing studies on model-informed precision dosing in inflammatory bowel disease will help assess the additional value of precision dosing software tools. Patient education and empowerment, and electronic health record-integrated TDM solutions will facilitate routine TDM implementation. Although optimization of therapeutic effectiveness is a primary focus, the cost-reducing potential of TDM also merits consideration.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful implementation of TDM for infliximab necessitates interdisciplinary collaboration among clinicians, hospital pharmacists, and (quantitative) clinical pharmacologists to ensure an efficient research trajectory.

Comparative effectiveness and drug survival of biosimilar infliximab CPT-13 vs. reference infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of switching to the biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, there is limited research directly comparing the effectiveness, drug survival, and pharmacokinetic profiles of the reference infliximab (IFX) and CT-P13 in real clinical settings.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and drug survival of CPT-13 and reference IFX at weeks 26 and 52, and to determine the pharmacokinetic profiles and safety profile in real-world settings.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort analysis was conducted at a single center. The study compared the proportion of patients achieving clinical remission and experiencing poor clinical outcomes at weeks 26 and 52. The drug survival rate of CT-P13 and reference infliximab was also assessed during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients were included in the study, 39.2% receiving CPT-13 and 60.8% reference IFX. At week 26, clinical remission rates were 66.7% (CPT-13: 74.4% vs. reference IFX: 62.3%, p=0.178), and at week 52, they were 64% (CPT-13: 85.4% vs. reference IFX: 63.0%, p=0.012). Subgroup analysis with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) found no significant differences at week 26 (CPT-13: 74.4% vs. reference IFX: 58.8%, p=0.235) or at week 52 (CPT-13: 85.4% vs. reference IFX: 68.8%, p=0.153).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates comparable efficacy, drug survival, pharmacokinetic profiles, and incidence of immunogenicity between both drugs in a real clinical setting. Further studies with greater statistical power are needed to validate these findings.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel diseases. Position statement of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis

The treatment of inflammatory bowel disease has undergone a significant transformation following the introduction of biologic drugs. Thanks to these drugs, treatment goals have evolved from clinical response and remission to more ambitious objectives, such as endoscopic or radiologic remission. However, even though biologics are highly effective, a significant percentage of patients will not achieve an initial response or may lose it over time. We know that there is a direct relationship between the trough concentrations of the biologic and its therapeutic efficacy, with more demanding therapeutic goals requiring higher drug levels, and inadequate exposure being common. Therapeutic drug monitoring of biologic medications, along with pharmacokinetic models, provides us with the possibility of offering a personalized approach to treatment for patients with IBD. Over the past few years, relevant information has accumulated regarding its utility during or after induction, as well as in the maintenance of biologic treatment, in reactive or proactive strategies, and prior to withdrawal or treatment de-escalation. The aim of this document is to establish recommendations regarding the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, in different clinical practice scenarios, and to identify areas where its utility is evident, promising, or controversial.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring as a Tool for the Clinical Outcome Prediction in Vedolizumab-Treated Patients: An Italian Pilot Study

Over the years, vedolizumab (VDZ) has emerged as a more effective target therapy for inflammatory bowel disease. The aim of this work was to analyze a cohort of inflammatory bowel disease patients, evaluating the association between VDZ serum concentrations at 6 months from starting therapy and their clinical and biochemical indexes within one year of treatment, correlating drug levels with response and clinical remission. Forty patients treated with VDZ were enrolled. Drug concentrations were quantified through ELISA methods. VDZ levels correlated with hemoglobin levels at twelve months of therapy (p = 0.03) and with clinical remission at twelve months of therapy (p = 0.03); patients who reached clinical remission showed higher VDZ concentrations. A VDZ cut-off value of 43.1 μg/mL was suggested, predicting clinical remission at twelve months of therapy. A statistically significant association between VDZ levels at T6 and calprotectin <250 μg/g at T12 was found (p = 0.04). Furthermore, the optimal threshold value of VDZ levels at T6 associated with calprotectin <250 μg/g at T12 was identified: through levels higher than 45.2 µg/mL, we were able to predict remission one year after therapy. In the final regression multivariate model, no factor was retained as a predictor of clinical remission at one year of treatment. In conclusion, this is the first pilot study reporting a possible VDZ serum cut-off value able to predict not only the clinical remission at twelve months of therapy but also the calprotectin level, which is very important, as it is a surrogate marker of mucosal healing.

Factors that influence infliximab biosimilar trough levels in the pediatric inflammatory bowel disease population

BACKGROUND

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of biosimilar infliximab (IFX-BioS) in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are poorly investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate factors predicting IFX-BioS trough levels (TLs).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

IBD children with an indication to start IFX-BioS were included in this prospective observational study (January 2021-June 2022). TLs were measured at the 4th and 6th infusions and correlated with several covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 110 TLs in 55 children were included. The multivariate linear regression model at the 4th infusion found a positive correlation between TLs and age at diagnosis (B:1.950, 95% CI: [0.019, 3.882], p = 0.048) and IFX-BioS dose/kg (B:1.962, 95% CI: [0.238, 3.687], p = 0.029), and a negative correlation with clinical scores (B:-0.401, 95% CI: [-0.738, -0.064], p = 0.023). At the 6th infusion, female gender (B:6.887, 95% CI: [0.861, 12.913], p = 0.029), hemoglobin (B:1.853, 95% CI: [0.501, 3.204], p = 0.011), and IFX-BioS dose/kg (B:1.792, 95% CI: [0.979, 2.605], p < 0.001) were found to be positively correlated to TLs. No association between combined clinical and biochemical remission and TLs was found.

CONCLUSIONS

This study discovered some predictors for IFX-BioS TLs in IBD children. Knowledge of predictive factors could help physicians choose the best dosing regimen.

Correlation between trough levels of infliximab and postoperative endoscopic recurrence in Crohn's disease patients submitted to ileocolonic resections

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate serum levels of Infliximab (IFX) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) who underwent an ileocolonic resection and to correlate them with the presence or absence of endoscopic disease recurrence.

METHODS

An observational and cross-sectional study was carried out in patients from 2 treatment centers in Curitiba-PR, with CD, who underwent ileocaecal resection and used IFX after surgery. Drug serum levels were measured, and colonoscopy was performed 30 days before or after collection. Patients were then divided into two groups: with or without endoscopic recurrence (defined as a Rutgeerts score greater than or equal to 2), and mean serum IFX levels were identified and compared. The primary objective was the correlation between recurrence and the median levels of IFX, performed comparatively between groups.

RESULTS

Of the 21 patients included in the study, 14 had no endoscopic recurrence and 7 had it. There was no difference between groups in terms of baseline patient characteristics, mono or combo therapy treatment, serum albumin, and the time elapsed between collection of serum levels and diagnosis, surgery, and beginning of therapy. Patients with endoscopic recurrence used more biologics previously ( P  = 0.027). There was no difference between the median values of serum IFX levels between the groups: (4.71 [0.03-14.4]) in patients without recurrence versus (2.18 [0.88-14]) in those with recurrence ( P  = 0.601).

CONCLUSION

Low serum IFX levels were not correlated with postoperative endoscopic recurrence. Studies with a larger number of patients are needed to better test the proposed hypothesis.

Enhancing Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comparative Analysis of Rapid Point-of-Care Infliximab, Adalimumab and Anti-Drug Antibodies' Determination against ELISA

The introduction of point-of-care (POC) assays into clinical practice in patients with inflammatory disease enables on-demand therapeutic decision making. The aim of this study was to compare the POC test Quantum blue (Bühlmann Laboratories) for infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADL), and its anti-drug antibodies with the traditional ELISA assay (Promonitor). A total of 200 serum samples were analyzed. Samples were classified into the following three different groups; sub-therapeutic range (IFX < 3 μg/mL and ADL < 5 μg/mL); therapeutic range (IFX: 3-7 μg/mL and ADL: 5-12 μg/mL) and supra-therapeutic range (IFX levels > 7 μg/mL and ADL levels > 12 μg/mL). Significant higher values were measured using the POC test (p < 0.001) for IFX results but no differences in ADL trough levels were observed (p = 0.3101). Spearman's correlation indicated a good correlation between the two assays (rs = 0.88 for ADL and rs = 0.93 for IFX), and McNemar's test revealed significant differences (p = 0.016) when classifying IFX samples between therapeutic and supra-therapeutic ranges but no significant differences were found among the other ranges for either IFX or ADL. These results show that we should be cautious when using these rapid measurement methods, and new targets should probably be defined for IFX when using this new analytical method.

The perceived waning of biologics in severe asthma

BACKGROUND

Biologics are highly effective in severe asthma and used at fixed dosing intervals. However, in clinical practice, dosing intervals are sometimes shortened if patients perceive a decreased biologic effect before the next administration. The occurrence and clinical relevance of this perceived waning of biological effect is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To explore (1) the frequency, severity and conditions, (2) associated symptoms and (3) relationship with clinical characteristics of the patient-perceived waning effect of biologics before the next administration.

METHODS

Severe asthma patients receiving biological treatment ≥4 months were included. Based on 17 semi-structured patient interviews, we developed a questionnaire focusing on the waning effect of biologics before the next administration, which was distributed among 129 patients. Clinical characteristics, including asthma control (ACQ) and quality of life (AQLQ) scores, were collected from patient files.

RESULTS

65/101 patients who completed the questionnaire reported a waning of biological effect, graded as severe (median (IQR) 6.5 (5-7.5) on a 0-10 BORG-scale). Waning manifested in a broad spectrum of symptoms. Patients reporting waning had higher ACQ and lower AQLQ scores versus those without (p < 0.05) and higher BORG-scores were associated with higher exacerbation rate (ρ = 0.309, p = 0.013). A third of all patients were in favor of extending or shortening their dosing interval.

CONCLUSION

Two-thirds of severe asthma patients report waning of biologic effect at the end of the dosing interval, which is associated with poorer asthma control and quality of life. The diversity in observed waning of effect opens the way for research into more individualized dosing of biologics.

Four-year review of New Zealand laboratory infliximab and adalimumab concentration results indicating potential for improved dosing

A review of laboratory results across New Zealand for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab and adalimumab concentrations and antidrug antibodies (ADAs) over 4 years was completed. Of 6591 results, the median serum concentration for infliximab was 5.7 mg/L and for adalimumab was 5.5 mg/L. Subtherapeutic drug concentrations (<7 mg/L) were measured in 54% of samples. Drug concentrations <2 mg/L were measured in 23% of samples, with ADAs detected in 51% of these. The high number of samples with subtherapeutic drug concentrations and common ADA detection is consistent with failing therapy but could also suggest that standard dosing is frequently too low for patients. These results reinforce the value of antitumour necrosis factor drug TDM in making decisions to adjust dosing or switch agents in patients taking infliximab and adalimumab.

Higher Adalimumab Trough Levels Are Associated with Histologic Remission and Mucosal Healing in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

(1) Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in endoscopic remission have persistent histologic activity, which is associated with worse outcomes. There are limited data on the association between adalimumab drug concentrations and histologic outcomes using validated histologic indices. We aimed to assess the relationship between adalimumab concentrations and the Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI). (2) Patients from a tertiary IBD center from 2013 to 2020 with serum adalimumab (ADA) trough concentrations measured during maintenance therapy (≥14 weeks) and a colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy with biopsies performed within 90 days of drug level were included. Blinded histologic scoring using the RHI was performed. Primary analysis assessed the relationship between adalimumab drug concentrations and histologic remission using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. (3) In 36 patients (26 Crohn's Disease, 9 ulcerative colitis, 1 indeterminate), median adalimumab concentrations were higher (17.3 ug/mL, 12.2-24.0) in patients with histologic remission compared to those without (10.3 ug/mL, 6.8-13.9, p = 0.008). The optimal ADA concentration identified using the Youden threshold was ≥16.3 ug/mL (sensitivity 70%, specificity 90%). Patients with ADA ≥ 16.3 ug/mL had higher histologic remission rates (78%) compared to lower ADA concentrations (14%, p= 0.002), as well as higher mucosal healing rates (86%) compared to lower levels (12%, p = 0.001). Symptoms correlated weakly and non-significantly with both histologic (RHI) scores (r = 0.25, p = 0.2) and adalimumab concentrations (r = 0.05, p = 0.8). (4) The current study demonstrated that higher serum adalimumab concentrations (≥16.3 ug/mL) are needed for histologic remission and mucosal healing assessed using the RHI.

Real-World Implementation and Outcomes of Adalimumab Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Psoriasis: A National Specialized Center Experience

Serum adalimumab concentration is a biomarker of treatment response but therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is yet to be implemented in routine psoriasis care. We incorporated adalimumab TDM in a national specialized psoriasis service and evaluated it using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) implementation science framework. We undertook pre-implementation planning (validating local assays) and implementation interventions targeted to patients (pragmatic sampling at routine reviews), clinicians (introduction of a TDM protocol), and healthcare systems (adalimumab TDM as a key performance indicator). Over 5 months, 170 of 229 (74%) individuals treated with adalimumab received TDM. Clinical improvement after TDM-guided dose escalation occurred in 13 of 15 (87%) nonresponders with serum drug concentrations <8.3 μg/ml (median PASI reduction of 3.2 [interquartile range = 2.2-8.2] after 23.4 weeks) and in all nonresponders who had TDM-guided switch in biologic due to supratherapeutic drug concentrations (>8.3 μg/ml; n = 2) or positive antidrug antibody (n = 2) (PASI reduction of 7.8 [interquartile range = 7.5-12.9] after 20.0 weeks). Proactive TDM led to dose reduction in five individuals with clear skin and subtherapeutic or supratherapeutic drug concentrations; four (80%) sustained clear skin after 50 weeks (range = 42-52). Adalimumab TDM based on pragmatic serum sampling is clinically viable and may lead to patient benefit. Context-specific implementation interventions and systematic implementation assessment may bridge the biomarker research-to-practice gap.

Status and Quality of Guidelines for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Based on AGREE II Instrument

BACKGROUND

With the progress of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) technology and the development of evidence-based medicine, many guidelines were developed and implemented in recent decades.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to evaluate the current status of TDM guidelines and provide suggestions for their development and updates based on Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II.

METHODS

The TDM guidelines were systematically searched for among databases including PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and the Chinese biomedical literature service system and the official websites of TDM-related associations. The search period was from inception to 6 April 2023. Four researchers independently screened the literature and extracted data. Any disagreement was discussed and reconciled by another researcher. The quality of guidelines was assessed using the AGREE II instrument.

RESULTS

A total of 92 guidelines were included, including 57 technical guidelines, three management guidelines, and 32 comprehensive guidelines. The number of TDM guidelines has gradually increased since 1979. The United States published the most guidelines (20 guidelines), followed by China (15 guidelines) and the United Kingdom (ten guidelines), and 23 guidelines were developed by international organizations. Most guidelines are aimed at adult patients only, while 28 guidelines include special populations. With respect to formulation methods, there are 23 evidence-based guidelines. As for quality evaluation results based on AGREE II, comprehensive guidelines scored higher (58.16%) than technical guidelines (51.36%) and administrative guidelines (50.00%).

CONCLUSION

The number of TDM guidelines, especially technical and comprehensive ones, has significantly increased in recent years. Most guidelines are confronted with the problems of unclear methodology and low quality of evidence according to AGREE II. More evidence-based research on TDM and high-quality guideline development is recommended to promote individualized therapy.

Outcomes of Infliximab-Treated inflammatory bowel disease patients undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring with two different assays

OBJECTIVES

There are multiple assays for infliximab (IFX) drug level (IFX-DL) and antibody to infliximab (ATI) measurement. The aims of this study are to examine the correlation and outcomes of IFX-DL and ATI in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, simultaneously measured with different methods in different institutions.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Residual samples of IFX-treated IBD patients undergoing drug monitoring for IFX-DL and ATI, both measured by ECLIA (Esoterix Laboratories) were used to simultaneously quantify IFX-DL via LC-MS/MS and ATI via an in-house ECLIA (ih-ECLIA) (Mayo Clinic Laboratories). Comparisons of IFX-DL and ATI detection between the assays from different institutions were performed, along with a comparison between the assays by association of IFX-DL and ATI obtained by each method with clinical remission, endoscopic healing (EH) and normal serum C-reactive protein (CRP ≤ 8 mg/L).

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients were included (median age, 32 years (range, 12-84); 45.7% female). The median IFX-DL was 7 mcg/mL (IQR: 1.3, 19.4) and 6 mcg/mL (IQR: 0.9, 20) via LC-MS/MS and ECLIA, respectively (Spearman correlation coefficient r = 0.97). ATI was detected in 13/142 (9.2%) via ih-ECLIA of whom 100% had IFX-DL < 5 mcg/mL by LC-MS/MS. ATI was positive in 39/151 (25.8%) via ECLIA, and 84.6% of positives had IFX-DL < 5 mcg/mL by ECLIA. Compared to ECLIA, the frequency of ATI detection via ih-ECLIA was lower in patients in clinical remission (7.3% vs 36.6%; p = 0.0005), those with normal CRP (5.9% vs. 20.0%; p = 0.0005), and in patients with EH (5.3% vs 18.4%; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

IFX-DL was comparable between LC-MS/MS and ECLIA assays. Rate of ATI detection via ih-ECLIA was lower than ECLIA, which was more aligned with favorable clinical outcomes.

Adalimumab originator versus adalimumab biosimilars in inflammatory bowel disease in Australia

BACKGROUND

Biosimilar adalimumabs have improved treatment access, but without any clinical advantage, distributors rely on delivery device design-enhancements, support services, and removal of painful excipients to capture market share. Prescribers, however, are often unaware of these differences. This article compares and contrasts originator versus biosimilar adalimumab agents to identify key differences that might influence adalimumab selection.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We reviewed listed adalimumab biosimilars in Australia and compared them to the originator adalimumab. Similarities and differences identified were confirmed with the manufacturers via two rounds of interviews: the first to collate a list of features and benefits of their product, and the second to consolidate and confirm the data.

RESULTS

The originator adalimumab Humira [by AbbVie, U.S.A] and four adalimumab biosimilars (Amgevita [by Amgen, U.S.A], Hadlima [by Organon, U.S.A], Hyrimoz [by Sandoz, Switzerland], and Idacio [by Fresenius Kabi, Germany]) are included in this review. Key differences identified include product formulation, dosages available, delivery devices, physician support, patient support, and the supply of other biosimilar products by the company.

CONCLUSION

Adalimumab biosimilars are different from each other with unique advantages and disadvantages likely to influence prescriber and patients. Therefore, the choice of agent should be individualized to the needs of the patient and the healthcare service.

The Role of Low-Dose Oral Methotrexate in Increasing Anti-TNF Drug Levels and Reducing Immunogenicity in IBD

Concomitant immunomodulation is utilised in combination with anti-TNF therapy for IBD primarily to increase drug levels and prevent anti-drug antibody formation. Whilst thiopurines have traditionally been the immunomodulator of choice in IBD populations, there are concerns regarding the long-term safety of the prolonged use of these agents: particularly an association with lymphoproliferative disorders. Given this, we have explored the existing literature on the use of low-dose oral methotrexate as an alternative immunomodulator for this indication. Although there is a lack of data directly comparing the efficacies of methotrexate and thiopurines as concomitant immunomodulators, the available literature supports the use of methotrexate in improving the pharmacokinetics of anti-TNF agents. Furthermore, low-dose oral methotrexate regimens appear to have comparable efficacies to higher-dose parenteral administration and are better tolerated. We suggest that clinicians should consider the use of low-dose oral methotrexate as an alternative to thiopurines when the primary purpose of concomitant immunomodulation is to improve anti-TNF pharmacokinetics.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Anti-TNFα Inhibitors: A Matter of Cut-Off Ranges

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a useful tool for optimising the use of anti-TNFα inhibitors in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Recently, point-of-care methods for the quantification of drug levels and anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) have been developed to overcome the limitations of conventional enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assays (ELISAs). Here, we evaluated the performance, interchangeability, and agreement between an automated ELISA-based immunoassay (CHORUS Promonitor) and the lateral flow assay (RIDA^®QUICK) for the quantification of infliximab (IFX, n = 65) and adalimumab (ADM, n = 58) plasma levels in IBD patients. Thirty-two samples for IFX and twenty-three samples for ADM that tested positively for the presence of ADAs were also used. Overall, data analysis showed a good agreement of ADM trough concentrations (R² = 0.75) between the two assays as well as for ADA measurement (K > 0.8). However, IFX levels highlighted a weak correlation (R² = 0.58) between the two kits, with the RIDA^®QUICK assay overestimating IFX plasma values by 30% when compared to the CHORUS Promonitor kit. Results from this study show that the two assays are not quantitatively and qualitatively interchangeable due to substantial discrepancies in some results. Accordingly, the same assay should be used for the longitudinal follow-up of IBD patients.

Surface plasmon resonance assays for the therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab indicate clinical relevance of anti-infliximab antibody binding properties

OBJECTIVES

The therapeutic antibody infliximab (IFX) has improved the life quality of numerous autoinflammatory disease patients. However, IFX can trigger the generation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA), whose optimal evaluation and management are currently subject of controversial discussions. We present two novel surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor assays for therapeutic drug monitoring of IFX and characterization of ADA and investigated the diagnostic value of ADA binding properties.

METHODS

IFX and ADA were quantified via developed SPR biosensor assays (IFXmon and ADAmon, respectively) and diagnostics-approved ELISA in sera from inflammatory bowel disease patients. Pre-analytic ADA enrichment with magnetic beads enabled analytical drug tolerance of the ADAmon assay. The dissociation ratio (DissR) as an index for ADA:IFX binding stability was calculated from the SPR sensorgrams of ADA quantification runs.

RESULTS

IFX levels determined by IFXmon assay and ELISA showed high agreement, whereas ADA quantification concordance between ADAmon assay and ELISA was poor. In patients, DissR was predominantly constant over time and differed significantly between therapy outcomes. A DissR cut-off of 1.524 indicated undetectable IFX levels with 71.4% sensitivity and 88.9% specificity. Additionally, the SPR reference surface was exploited as serum-individual negative control to check result plausibility within multi-sample run sequences.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, both SPR biosensor assays exhibited reliable quantitative performance with accuracies superior to their ELISA counterparts and precision inferior to ELISA only for ADAmon. DissR presented itself as promising ADA binding parameter and could contribute to both earlier and more tailored therapeutic decisions.

Personalized Dosing of Infliximab in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Using a Bayesian Approach: A Next Step in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

Although biological agents have revolutionized the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), a significant proportion of patients show primary non-response or develop secondary loss of response. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is advocated to maintain the efficacy of biologic agents. Reactive TDM can rationalize the management of primary non-response and secondary loss of response and has shown to be more cost-effective compared with empiric dose escalation. Proactive TDM is shown to increase clinical remission and the durability of the response to a biologic agent. However, the efficacy of proactive and reactive TDM has been questioned in recent studies and meta-analyses. Hence, we need a different approach to TDM, which addresses inflammatory burden, the individual patient, and disease factors. Bayesian approaches, which use population pharmacokinetic models, enable clinicians to make better use of TDM for dose adjustment. With rapid improvement in computer technology, these Bayesian model-based software packages are now available for clinical use. Bayesian dashboard systems allow clinicians to apply model-based dosing to understand an individual's pharmacokinetics and achieve a target serum drug concentration. The model is updated using previously measured drug concentrations and relevant patient factors, such as body weight, C-reactive protein, and serum albumin concentration, to maintain effective drug concentrations in the serum. Initial studies have found utility for the Bayesian approach in induction and maintenance, in adult and pediatric patients, in clinical trials, and in real-life situations for patients with IBD treated with infliximab. This needs confirmation in larger studies. This article reviews the Bayesian approach to therapeutic drug monitoring in IBD.

Iranian Consensus Guideline for Pharmacotherapy with Biologics and Small Molecules Drugs in Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Background: Pharmacotherapy with biologics and small molecules, as the more effective therapies for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), is complex. Choosing the best methods for their utilization in order to induce and maintain remission are critical for practicing gastroenterologists. We aimed to develop an Iranian consensus on the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with biologics and small molecules. Methods: A Delphi consensus was undertaken by experts who performed a literature summary and voting process. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading and Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation; and an additional risk of bias-protocol. Results: Following an extensive search of the literature, 219 studies were used to determine the quality of the evidence. After three rounds of voting, consensus (defined as≥80% agreement) was reached for 87 statements. Conclusion: We considered different aspects of pharmacotherapy in this consensus. This guideline, along with clinical judgment, can be used to optimize management of IBD patients.

Current Role of Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in Pediatric IBD: A Special Focus on Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Treat-to-Target Strategies

In the last two decades, biologicals have become essential in treating children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease. TNF-α inhibitors (infliximab, adalimumab and golimumab) are preferentially used. Recent studies suggest that early application of TNF-α inhibitors is beneficial to inducing disease remission and preventing complications such as development of penetrating ulcers and fistulas. However, treatment failure occurs in about one third of pediatric patients. Particularly, children and adolescents differ in drug clearance, emphasizing the importance of pharmacokinetic drug monitoring in the pediatric setting. Here, current data on the choice and effectiveness of biologicals and therapeutic drug monitoring strategies are reviewed.

Relationship Between Serum Ustekinumab Trough Concentration and Clinical and Biochemical Disease Activity: A Real-World Study in Adult Patients with Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The role of therapeutic drug monitoring for ustekinumab in the treatment of Crohn's disease has not been defined. This study aimed to explore the relationship of serum ustekinumab trough concentration (UTC) with clinical and biochemical disease outcomes in a real-world setting.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of Crohn's disease patients treated at a single tertiary centre. Ustekinumab was given as a single intravenous induction dose, followed by maintenance subcutaneous injections every 4 to 8 weeks. Rates of clinical remission (Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≤ 4), biochemical remission (C-reactive protein < 5 mg/l and faecal calprotectin < 150 μg/g) and complete remission were assessed at baseline and at the time of UTC testing during maintenance therapy. The association between baseline variables and UTC was tested using linear regression. We also performed an external validation analysis of UTC cut-offs established in four previously published studies.

RESULTS

This study included 43 patients. Compared to 8-weekly dosing, a 2.49- and 2.65-fold increase in UTC was associated with 6-weekly and 4-weekly dosing respectively. However, there was no significant difference in clinical, biochemical or complete remission among the dosing groups. An external validation of previously published optimal UTC cut-offs found low predictive value for our patient population.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, dosing interval was the only determinant significantly associated with a higher UTC for patients on maintenance ustekinumab therapy. While a higher UTC may be achieved with dose escalation, it was not associated with improved rates of clinical or biochemical response in our cohort.

Ustekinumab Trough Concentrations Are Associated with Biochemical Outcomes in Patients with Crohn's Disease

OBJECTIVE

It is unknown whether ustekinumab (UST) levels can predict clinical outcomes in Crohn's disease (CD) patients. We assessed the exposure-response relationship of UST trough concentrations with biochemical outcomes at week 24 in a prospective, real-world setting.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study in patients with CD starting UST in four academic centres in the Netherlands. All patients received a weight-adjusted intravenous (IV) UST induction dose, followed by one subcutaneous (SC) dose of 90 mg UST at 8 weeks. Maintenance therapy consisted of 90 mg subcutaneous UST every 8 or 12 weeks. Individual UST concentration time course during treatment were estimated using a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model. Quartile analysis and logistic regression were performed to analyse if UST concentrations at week 8 were associated with biochemical remission rates at week 24 (C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤ 5 mg/L and / or faecal calprotectin (FC) ≤ 250 mg/kg).

RESULTS

In total, 124 patients with CD were included. Patients achieving biochemical remission at week 12 and 24 had significantly higher UST levels at week 8 compared to patients without biochemical remission (6.6 µg/mL versus 3.9 µg/mL, P < 0.01 and 6.3 µg/mL versus 3.9 µg/mL, P < 0.01, respectively). In quartile analysis, patients with UST levels in the highest quartile (≥ 6.3 µg/mL at week 8) had higher biochemical remission rates at week 12 and week 24. There was no association between UST levels at and corticosteroid-free clinical remission rates.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world cohort of patients with CD, UST levels in the highest quartile (≥ 6.3 µg/mL) at week 8 were associated with higher biochemical remission rates at week 24.

Defining the Failure of Medical Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Era of Advanced Therapies: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The expansion of advanced therapies for inflammatory bowel disease created a lag between the development of these new therapies and their incorporation and use in daily practice. At present, no clear definitions for treatment optimization, treatment failure or criteria to abandon therapy are available. We aimed to centralize criteria for a nonresponse to all available molecules and to summarize guideline principles for treatment optimization.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of studies that reported criteria for the treatment response to all advanced therapies (infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, ustekinumab, vedolizumab and tofacitinib) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

RESULTS

Across trials, criteria for a response of both patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are heterogenous. Investigators use different definitions for clinical and endoscopic remission, and endoscopic response and outcomes are assessed at variable time points. Current society guidelines provide heterogenous recommendations on treatment optimization. Most available data on loss of response concern anti-TNF molecules, and newer therapies are not included in the guidelines.

CONCLUSION

The lack of clear definitions and formal recommendations provide the premise for empirical treatment strategies and premature abandonment of therapies.

Treatment escalation and de-escalation decisions in Crohn's disease: Delphi consensus recommendations from Japan, 2021

BACKGROUND

We aimed to develop criteria for treatment intensification in patients with (1) luminal Crohn's disease (CD), (2) CD with perianal disease and/or fistula, (3) CD with small bowel stenosis, (4) in the postoperative setting, and (5) for discontinuing or reducing the dose of treatment in patients with CD.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched for studies published since 1998 which may be relevant to the five defined topics. Results were assessed for relevant studies, with preference given to data from randomized, controlled studies. For each question, a core panel of 12 gastroenterologists defined the treatment target and developed statements, based on the literature, current guidelines, and relevant additional studies. The evidence supporting each statement was graded using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine: Levels of Evidence (March 2009). A modified Delphi process was used to refine statements and gain agreement from 54 Japanese specialists at in-person and online meetings conducted between October 2020 and April 2021.

RESULTS

Seventeen statements were developed for treatment intensification in luminal CD (targeting endoscopic remission), six statements for treatment intensification in perianal/fistulizing CD (targeting healing of perianal lesions and complete closure of the fistula), six statements for treatment intensification in CD with small bowel stenosis (targeting resolution of obstructive symptoms), seven statements for treatment intensification after surgery (targeting endoscopic remission), and five statements for discontinuing or reducing the dose of treatment in patients with CD.

CONCLUSIONS

These statements provide guidance on how and when to intensify or de-intensify treatment for a broad spectrum of patients with CD.

Adalimumab Serum Concentrations, Clinical and Endoscopic Disease Activity in Crohn's Disease: A Cross-Sectional Multicentric Latin American Study

Despite some variability in ideal serum Adalimumab (ADA) concentrations, there is increasing evidence that higher concentrations of anti-TNF-α agents can be associated with sustained efficacy, and low or undetectable levels may lead to loss of response. This study aims to correlate serum ADA concentrations with clinical and endoscopic activity in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). A cross-sectional and multicentric study was performed with patients with CD, who used ADA for at least 24 weeks. Patients were allocated into groups according to the presence of clinical or endoscopic disease activity. Serum ADA concentrations were measured and compared between groups. Overall, 89 patients were included. A total of 27 patients had clinically active CD and 62 were in clinical remission. Forty patients had endoscopic disease activity and 49 were in endoscopic remission. The mean serum ADA concentration was 10.2 μg/mL in patients with clinically active CD and 14.3 μg/mL in patients in clinical remission (p = 0.395). The mean serum ADA concentration in patients with endoscopic activity was 11.3 μg/mL as compared to 14.5 μg/mL in those with endoscopic remission (p = 0.566). There was no difference between serum ADA concentrations regarding clinical or endoscopic activity in CD, as compared to patients in remission.

EULAR points to consider for therapeutic drug monitoring of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases

OBJECTIVE

To develop EULAR points-to-consider for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs).

METHODS

The points-to-consider were developed in accordance with EULAR standardised operation procedures by a multidisciplinary task force from eight European countries, based on a systematic literature review and expert consensus. Level of evidence and strength of the points-to-consider were determined, and mean levels of agreement among the task force were calculated using a 10-point rating scale.

RESULTS

Six overarching principles and 13 points-to-consider were formulated. The level of agreement among the task force for the overarching principles and points-to-consider ranged from 8.4 to 9.9.The overarching principles define TDM and its subtypes, and reinforce the underlying pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles, which are relevant to all biopharmaceutical classes. The points-to-consider highlight the clinical utility of the measurement and interpretation of biopharmaceutical blood concentrations and antidrug antibodies in specific clinical scenarios, including factors that influence these parameters. In general, proactive use of TDM is not recommended but reactive TDM could be considered in certain clinical situations. An important factor limiting wider adoption of TDM is the lack of both high quality trials addressing effectiveness and safety of TDM and robust economic evaluation in patients with RMDs. Future research should focus on providing this evidence, as well as on further understanding of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of biopharmaceuticals.

CONCLUSION

These points-to-consider are evidence-based and consensus-based statements for the use of TDM of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory RMDs, addressing the clinical utility of TDM.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease: implementation, utilization, and barriers in clinical practice in Scandinavia

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may optimize biologic and thiopurine therapies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The study aimed to investigate implementation and utilization of TDM in Scandinavia.

METHODS

A web-based questionnaire on the use of TDM was distributed to Scandinavian gastroenterologists via the national societies.

RESULTS

In total, 297 IBD physicians prescribing biologic therapies, equally distributed between community and university hospitals, were included (response rate 42%) (Norway 118 (40%), Denmark 86 (29%), Sweden 50 (17%), Finland 33 (11%), Iceland 10 (3%)). Overall, TDM was applied during biologic therapies by 87%, and for TNF-inhibitors >90%. Among the users, reactive and proactive TDM were utilized by 90% and 63%, respectively. Danish physicians were significantly less inclined to use TDM compared to other Scandinavian countries; (58% vs 98%); OR 0.03 [0.01-0.09], p < 0.001). Reactive TDM was commonly applied at primary (74%) and secondary (99%) treatment failure. Proactive TDM was used by 80% during maintenance therapy and 56% during induction and more commonly utilized in Norway (p < 0.001), and by physicians managing >10 IBD patients/week (p = 0.005). TDM scenarios were interpreted in accord with available evidence but with discrepancies for proactive TDM. The main barriers to TDM were lack of guidelines (51%) and time lag between sampling and results (49%). TDM of thiopurines was routinely used by 87%.

CONCLUSION

TDM of biologic and thiopurine therapies has been broadly implemented into clinical practice in Scandinavia. However, physicians call for TDM guidelines detailing indications and interpretations of test results along with improved test response times.

Identification of the optimal medical and surgical management for patients with perianal fistulising Crohn's disease

AIM

The aim of our study was to assess the best medical and surgical approaches for perianal Crohn's disease (PCD) in order to identify an optimal combined medical and surgical treatment.

METHODS

Medical records of all patients with PCD treated with TNFα antagonists in two referral centres between 1998 and 2018 were reviewed. Predictors of long-term outcomes were identified using a Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients were included. Fifty-three patients (26.5%) were treated with adalimumab and 147 (73.5%) with infliximab. A combination of TNFα antagonist with an immunosuppressant and the presence of proctitis were independently associated with fistula closure. Seton was placed in 127 patients (63.5%) before starting biological therapy. Eighty patients (40%) underwent additional perineal surgery. Prior PCD surgery, seton positioning, additional perineal surgery, and additional surgery within 52 weeks of anti-TNFα treatment were associated with an increased rate of fistula closure. Finally, medical combination therapy (anti-TNFα plus immunosuppressant) along with seton placement and additional surgery within 1 year was the best management for PCD patients (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Combined medical and surgical management is required for the treatment of PCD patients. Medical combination therapy associated with seton placement and additional surgery within 1 year is the best management for PCD patients.

Early Infliximab Clearance Predicts Remission in Children with Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Children with Crohn's disease have lower response rates to infliximab, lower infliximab levels, and higher infliximab clearance on weight-based dosing than adults. We hypothesize infliximab clearance is a predictive of later outcomes on infliximab in children with Crohn's disease.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study, data were collected from charts on diagnosis, anthropometry, routine labs, infliximab therapeutic drug monitoring, infliximab dosing, disease activity, and other treatments. With these data we generated a population pharmacokinetic model using non-linear mixed effects modeling and calculated infliximab clearance for each patient over time. Patients were classified as in remission, responder-only or non-responder at 5, 10 and 16 months. Regression and ROC analyses were used to assess for early predictors of remission and response to infliximab.

RESULTS

Eighty-five subjects were included, with a median follow-up of 22.3 months (IQR 10.1-36.8). Our pharmacokinetic model showed infliximab clearance was positively associated with CRP and weight, while negatively associated with albumin. In regression analyses, early infliximab clearance was the only significant, consistent predictor of remission. A 0.1 L/day increase in infliximab clearance predicted remission with an OR between 0.179 and 0.426. Differences in dosing did not account for differences in outcome. Infliximab clearance alone had moderate predictive accuracy of remission, with an AUC between 0.682 and 0.738.

CONCLUSIONS

Early infliximab clearance is strongly associated with remission in children with Crohn's disease. It may be useful as a marker of response in proactive therapeutic drug monitoring to guide early dose optimization and/or changes in treatment for betterment of long-term outcomes.

Efficacy of ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or a second anti-TNF agent after the failure of a first anti-TNF agent in patients with Crohn's disease: a multicentre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

No study has performed a face-to-face comparison of biologics after the failure of the first anti-TNF agent in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of biologics in this setting.

METHODS

Patients with CD who were refractory to a first anti-TNF agent, and treated with ustekinumab (UST), vedolizumab (VDZ), or a second anti-TNF drug as a second-line biological agent at 10 French tertiary centres from 2013 to 2019 were retrospectively included in this study.

RESULTS

Among the 203 patients included, 90 (44%) received UST, 42 (21%) received VDZ and 71 (35%) received a second anti-TNF agent. The first anti-TNF agent was discontinued due to a primary nonresponse in 42 (21%) patients. At weeks 14-24, the rates of steroid-free remission were similar between the UST, VDZ and second anti-TNF groups (29%, 38% and 44%, respectively, p = 0.15). With a mean follow-up of 118 weeks, drug survival was shorter for patients who received ustekinumab treatment (p = 0.001). In the case of trough level less than 5 µg/ml, patients treated with a second anti-TNF agent had a higher postinduction remission rate (p = 0.002), and drug survival (p = 0.0005). No other relevant factors were associated with treatment efficacy, including trough levels greater than 5 µg/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

VDZ, UST and a second anti-TNF agent exhibit similar efficacy in the short term, as second-biological line treatment in patients with CD who are refractory to a first anti-TNF agent, but shorter drug maintenance is observed for patients treated with UST.

Higher serum infliximab concentrations during induction predict short-term endoscopic response in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVE

Measuring of serum infliximab (IFX) induction concentrations might reduce primary non-response rates in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), but optimal target concentrations are unclear. We investigated whether IFX induction concentrations predict short-term endoscopic response at week 12 or treatment persistence at week 52.

METHODS

Sixty-nine IBD patients (Crohn's disease, n=24; ulcerative colitis, n=45) received standard IFX induction of 5 mg/kg bodyweight at weeks 0, 2, and 6. Responders continued maintenance therapy and underwent follow-up until week 52 or treatment discontinuation. We measured IFX concentrations at weeks 2, 6, and 12, and evaluated treatment response around week 12 with endoscopy or with clinical scores and fecal calprotectin. Using the receiver operating characteristic analysis, we determined optimal IFX concentration thresholds associated with treatment response. We further compared IFX induction concentrations between patients persisting on IFX at week 52 and patients discontinuing treatment due to insufficient response.

RESULTS

Responders (74%, 51 out of 69 patients) had significantly higher median IFX concentrations than non-responders at weeks 6 (25.06 vs. 19.68 µg/ml; P = 0.04) and 12 (18.03 vs. 10.02 µg/ml; P = 0.03), but not at week 2 (33.12 vs. 34.20 µg/ml; P = 0.97). Optimal IFX concentration thresholds for induction response were 21.33 and 5.13 µg/ml at weeks 6 and 12, respectively. Fifty-three patients continued IFX maintenance therapy until week 52. Induction concentrations failed to predict persistence on IFX therapy at week 52.

CONCLUSION

Higher IFX induction concentrations predict endoscopic short-term response. However, induction concentrations failed to predict long-term persistence on IFX treatment.

A Systematic Review on the interest of Drug Tolerant assay in the monitoring of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapies, of which infliximab (IFX) is most commonly used. Loss of response (LOR) to anti-TNF therapy due to immunogenic failure accounts for 20% of subsequent medical intervention and is defined, using a drug sensitive assay, as low or undetectable concentration of drug with high titers of anti-drug antibodies (ADAb). We performed a systematic review to investigate the use of a drug tolerant assay during both induction and maintenance to monitor patients treated with anti-TNFs. After the search on PubMed, 90 publications were reviewed. Most ADAb detection methods are drug sensitive, cannot detect ADAb in the presence of drug, and therefore cannot be used close to drug administration, when the drug concentration is too high. To overcome this major limitation, several drug-tolerant techniques have been developed and will be discussed in this review. Using drug-tolerant assays ADAb against infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADM) can be detected during induction and predict primary non-response or LOR. Drug sensitive assays do not allow detection of ADAb during the induction phase as IFX or ADM concentration is typically high.

Multi-utility of therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel diseases

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment targets have progressed over time from clinical response to clinical and endoscopic remission. Several data have shown a positive correlation between serum biologic drug concentrations and favorable therapeutic outcomes. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has evolved as an important approach for optimizing the use of immunobiologics, especially antitumor necrosis factor therapy, in patients with IBD. The use of TDM is supported by medical societies and IBD experts in different contexts; however, challenges remain due to knowledge gaps that limit the widespread use of it. The aim of this review is to assess the role of TDM in IBD, focusing on the implementation of this strategy in different scenarios and demonstrating the multi-utility aspects of this approach in clinical practice.

Management of Non-response and Loss of Response to Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy has been successfully used as first-line biologic treatment for moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), in both "step-up" and "top-down" approaches, and has become a cornerstone of IBD management. However, in a proportion of patients the effectiveness of anti-TNF therapy is sub-optimal. Either patients do not achieve adequate initial response (primary non-response) or they lose response after initial success (loss of response). Therapeutic drug monitoring determines drug serum concentrations and the presence of anti-drug antibodies (ADAbs) and can help guide treatment optimization to improve patient outcomes. For patients with low drug concentrations who are ADAb-negative or display low levels of ADAbs, dose escalation is recommended. Should response remain unchanged following dose optimization the question whether to switch within class (anti-TNF) or out of class (different mechanism of action) arises. If ADAb levels are high and the patient has previously benefited from anti-TNF therapy, then switching within class is a viable option as ADAbs are molecule specific. Addition of an immunomodulator may lead to a decrease in ADAbs and a regaining of response in a proportion of patients. If a patient does not achieve a robust therapeutic response with an initial anti-TNF despite adequate drug levels, then switching out of class is appropriate. In conjunction with the guidance above, other factors including patient preference, age, comorbidities, disease phenotype, extra-intestinal manifestations, and treatment costs need to be factored into the treatment decision. In this review we discuss current evidence in this field and provide guidance on therapeutic decision-making in clinical situations.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider

The objectives of this review were to collect and summarise evidence on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases and to inform the EULAR Task Force for the formulation of evidence-based points to consider. A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed, covering technical aspects and (clinical) utility of TDM, to answer 13 research questions. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane were searched until July 2020. American College of Rheumatology and EULAR abstracts were also considered for inclusion. Data were extracted in evidence tables and risk of bias assessment was performed. For the search on technical aspects, 678 records were identified, of which 22 papers were selected. For the clinical utility search, 3846 records were identified, of which 108 papers were included. Patient-related factors associated with biopharmaceutical blood concentrations included body weight, methotrexate comedication and disease activity. The identification of a target range was hampered by study variability, mainly disease activity measures and study type. Evidence was inconsistent for multiple clinical situations in which TDM is currently applied. However, for some particular scenarios, including prediction of future treatment response, non-response to treatment, tapering and hypersensitivity reactions, robust evidence was found. There is currently no evidence for routine use of proactive TDM, in part because published cost-effectiveness analyses do not incorporate the current landscape of biopharmaceutical costs and usage. This SLR yields evidence in favour of TDM of biopharmaceuticals in some clinical scenarios, but evidence is insufficient to support implementation of routine use of TDM.

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Anti-TNF Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review

Infliximab and adalimumab are monoclonal antibodies against tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) used to manage inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) has been proven to prevent immunogenicity, to achieve better long-term clinical results and to save costs in IBD treatment. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review on cost-effectiveness analyses of studies that apply TDM of anti-TNF in IBD and to provide a critical analysis of the best scientific knowledge available in the literature. The quality of the included studies was assessed using Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS). Cost-effectiveness of the TDM strategies was presented as total costs, cost savings, quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Thirteen studies that examined the health economics of TDM of anti-TNF in IBD from 2013 to 2021 were included. Eight of them (61.5%) achieved a score between 17 and 23 on the CHEERS checklist. The comparison between the TDM strategy and an empirical strategy was cost saving. The ICER between reactive TDM and an empirical strategy was dominated (favorable) by reactive TDM, whereas the ICER value for proactive TDM compared to an empirical strategy ranged from EUR 56,845 to 3,901,554. This systematic review demonstrated that a TDM strategy is cost-effective or cost-saving in IBD.

Swapping Versus Dose Optimization in Patients Losing Response to Adalimumab With Adequate Drug Levels

BACKGROUND

In cases of loss of response due to mechanistic failure under antitumor necrosis factor agents, it is recommended to switch to another class of biologics. Two different strategies were compared in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who were treated with nonoptimized adalimumab (ADA) and experienced a loss of response despite therapeutic trough levels of adalimuma-either ADA dose optimization or switching to vedolizumab or ustekinumab.

METHODS

Patients under maintenance therapy with ADA monotherapy (40 mg every 14 days) and who experienced a secondary loss of response with trough levels > 4.9 μg/mL were included prospectively in this nonrandomized study. The primary end point was the survival rate without therapeutic discontinuation after ADA dose optimization or switching to another class of biologics.

RESULTS

Adalimumab was optimized (n = 61 patients, 42 Crohn's disease, 19 ulcerative colitis) or swapped for vedolizumab (n = 40, 20 ulcerative colitis) or ustekinumab (n = 30, 30 Crohn's disease). At 24 months, 11 out of 70 patients (14.8%) in the swap group discontinued treatment compared with 36 out of 61 (59.6%) patients in the optimization group (P < 0.001). The median time without therapeutic discontinuation was significantly longer in the swap group (>24 months) than in the optimization group (13.3 months, P < 0.001). In the optimization group, treatment discontinuation was positively associated with baseline fecal calprotectin >500 μg/g (HR, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.16-10.72; P = 0.026) and inversely associated with variation of trough levels of adalimumab (>2 µg/mL from baseline to week 8 after optimization; HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.13-0.82; P = 0.03). In the swap group, no factor was associated with treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

In IBD patients under ADA maintenance therapy who experience a secondary loss of response and in whom trough levels are >4.9µg/mL, swapping to another class is better than optimizing ADA, which is, however, appropriate in a subgroup of patients.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease treatments

Recently, biological drugs have played a leading role in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may be useful in maximizing their effectiveness. TDM involves the measurement of serum drug and anti-drug antibodies concentrations as the basis for dosage adjustments or drug conversions to achieve a higher response rate. We believe that concentration thresholds should be individualized based on patients’ disease severity, extent and phenotype, and therapeutic purposes should also be considered, with higher cut-offs mainly needed for endoscopic and fistula healing than for symptomatic remission. Proactive and reactive TDM can help optimize treatment, especially in patients receiving anti-tumour necrosis factor, and guide dose adjustment or drug conversion with lower cost. TDM is a promising approach to achieve precision medicine and targeted medicine in the future.

Research Progress on Quantification Methods of Drug Concentration of Monoclonal Antibodies

Background:

With the development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) from the first generation of mice to the fourth generation of human origin, the efficacy and safety in the treatment of many diseases have been continuously improved. MAbs have been widely used in the treatment of cancer, chronic inflammatory diseases, and so on. However, the treatment response of mAbs varies greatly among individuals, and drug exposure may be affected by a variety of physiological and pathological factors, such as combined use of drugs and progression of disease. Therefore, studies tend to recommend therapeutic drug monitoring and individualized treatment strategies.

Objective:

In this paper, the commonly used methods of quantification of monoclonal antibodies were reviewed, especially liquid chromatography- mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), to provide technical support for therapeutic drug detection and individualize dosing for patients.

Conclusion:

For patients achieving mAbs treatment, it is necessary to carry out therapeutic drug monitoring and take it as a routine monitoring index. We recommend that for pharmaceutical laboratories in hospitals, establishing an appropriate assay formats, such as ELISA and LC-MS/MS is critical to determine drug concentration and antidrug antibody (ADA) for mAbs.

Next generation point-of-care test for therapeutic drug monitoring of adalimumab in patients diagnosed with autoimmune diseases

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of adalimumab (ADM) at the point-of-care (POC) is key to prevent loss of response but has not been accomplished to date because true POC testing solutions are still lacking. Here, we present a novel "whole blood in - result out" self-powered microfluidic chip for detecting ADM within 30 min to enable TDM at POC. Hereto, we first demonstrated on-chip plasma separation from whole blood, followed by downscaling an ADM ELISA with maintained specificity and sensitivity in plasma. This assay was then performed on a robust and easy-to-use microfluidic chip we designed based on (i)SIMPLE technology, allowing autonomous function upon single finger press activation, which was successfully validated with patient samples. Herein, we prove the potential of our technology to detect targets starting from whole blood introduced directly on-chip and to integrate various immunoassays, both for TDM and other in vitro diagnostics applications, like infectious diseases.

Model-Based Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy of Biologics and Small Targeted Molecules for Crohn’s Disease

Information on comparative drug efficacy is of great importance for drug development as well as clinical practice. Up to now, the relative efficacy of biologics and small targeted molecules for Crohn’s disease (CD) remains unclear. The objective of this study was to quantify the relative efficacy of investigational and approved biological treatments for CD measured in Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), and C-reactive protein (CRP). The analysis dataset was composed of summary-level data from 46 trials, containing 12,846 patients, with treatment of 24 drugs. Six mathematical models with non-parametric placebo estimations were developed to describe the time course and dose–response of six efficacy measures. The effects of covariate were further evaluated. Time–response relationships were found in outcomes measured in CDAI. The patients’ age, disease duration, baseline CDAI, and CRP showed an impact on the efficacy. Model simulations were performed to compare the efficacies across different drugs. The most achievement in clinical remission (defined as CDAI less than 150) and clinical response (defined as the reduction in CDAI for 100 or 70) was observed in the simulation for PF-04236921 and infliximab, respectively. The most improvement in IBDQ was shown in tofacitinib. In general, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors were the most effective biologics, and the highest efficacy of small targeted molecules was observed in janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. These findings have important implications for clinical practice in CD.

Delaying an infliximab infusion by more than 3 days is associated with a significant reduction in trough levels but not with clinical worsening

BACKGROUND

Higher infliximab trough levels (TLs) correlate with better clinical, inflammatory, and endoscopic outcomes among inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Although standard scheduled infliximab therapy regimen consists of infusions at pre-defined time-points (weeks 0, 2, 6, and every 8 weeks), short-period deviations from therapeutic schedule are common in 'real life', but the pharmacokinetic impact of these deviations has not been explored. In this study, we aim to determine whether short-period deviations from infusion schedule affect infliximab-TL.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all IBD patients receiving infliximab maintenance therapy every 8 weeks was conducted in a tertiary medical center. Patients with anti-drug antibodies, deliberate interval shortening and <3 sequential maintenance sera available were excluded. Associations between time since last infusion and TL were studied. Statistical analysis was performed using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

Out of over 10,000 sera, 2088 sera of 302 maintenance period stable infliximab-therapy-patients met inclusion criteria (median TL 4.1 μg/mL, interquartile range (IQR) 2.3-6.5 μg/mL). A delay beyond 3 days in infusion schedule (n > 59 days since last infusion) was found to significantly affect TL (mean difference in TL 0.9 μg/mL, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03-1.9 μg/mL, p < 0.04). Furthermore, among patients with delayed infusions, 80% had TL below 5 μg/mL, in comparison to 55% of patients who were not late (odds ratio (OR): 2.81, CI: 2.02-3.92, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Real-life delays of ⩽3 days from infusion protocol can probably be allowed. Delays >3 days culminate in measurable decrease of TL, although effect on clinical outcome is unclear. This needs to be taken into account when interpreting drug-level test results.

SUMMARY

A total of 2088 sera of 302 maintenance period inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients treated with infliximab were analyzed, to assess effect of small deviations from infusion schedule on TLs. A significant decline in patients' trough level (TL) was noted as early as 3 days after scheduled infusion.