Urgency for bowel movements is a highly discriminatory symptom of active disease in persons with IBD (the Manitoba Living with IBD study)

Fecal urgency and incontinence in inflammatory bowel disease perceived by physician and patient: Results from the Swiss fecal urgency survey

INTRODUCTION

Although increasingly appreciated, little is known about the prevalence of fecal urgency, fecal incontinence and differences between patients' and physicians' perception in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

We performed an online patient and physician survey to evaluate the assessment, prevalence and impact of fecal urgency and incontinence in IBD.

RESULTS

A total of 593 patients (44.0% ulcerative colitis (UC), 53.5% Crohn's disease (CD), 2.2% indeterminate colitis, 2 not specified) completed the survey (65.8% females, mean age 47.1 years). Fecal urgency was often reported (UC: 98.5%, CD: 96.2%) and was prevalent even during remission (UC: 65.9%, CD: 68.5%). Fecal urgency considerably impacted daily activities (visual analog scale [VAS] 5, IQR 3-8). Yet, 22.8% of patients have never discussed fecal urgency with their physicians. Fecal incontinence was experienced by 44.7% of patients and 7.9% on a weekly basis. Diapers/pads were required at least once a month in 20.4% of patients. However, 29.7% of patients never talked with their physician about fecal incontinence. UC was an independent predictor for the presence of moderate-severe fecal urgency (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.13-2.41) and fecal incontinence (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.22-2.59). All physicians claimed to regularly inquire about fecal urgency and incontinence. However, the impact of these symptoms on daily activities was overestimated compared with the patient feedback (median VAS 8 vs. 5, p = 0.0113, and 9 vs. 5, p = 0.0187).

CONCLUSIONS

Fecal urgency and incontinence are burdensome symptoms in IBD, with a similar prevalence in UC and CD. A mismatch was found between the physician and patient perception. These symptoms should be addressed during outpatient visits.

Psychiatric Comorbidity Does Not Enhance Prescription Opioid Use in Inflammatory Bowel Disease as It Does in the General Population

INTRODUCTION

Little is known about patterns of opioid prescribing in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but pain is common in persons with IBD. We estimated the incidence and prevalence of opioid use in adults with IBD and an unaffected reference cohort and assessed factors that modified opioid use.

METHODS

Using population-based health administrative data from Manitoba, Canada, we identified 5233 persons with incident IBD and 26 150 persons without IBD matched 5:1 on sex, birth year, and region from 1997 to 2016. New and prevalent opioid prescription dispensations were quantified, and patterns related to duration of use were identified. Generalized linear models were used to test the association between IBD, psychiatric comorbidity, and opioid use adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, physical comorbidities, and healthcare use.

RESULTS

Opioids were dispensed to 27% of persons with IBD and to 12.9% of the unaffected reference cohort. The unadjusted crude incidence per 1000 person-years of opioid use was nearly twice as high for the IBD cohort (88.63; 95% CI, 82.73-91.99) vs the reference cohort (45.02; 95% CI, 43.49-45.82; relative risk 1.97; 95% CI, 1.86-2.08). The incidence rate per 1000 person-years was highest in those 18-44 years at diagnosis (98.01; 95% CI, 91.45-104.57). The relative increase in opioid use by persons with IBD compared to reference cohort was lower among persons with psychiatric comorbidity relative to the increased opioid use among persons with IBD and reference cohort without psychiatric comorbidity.

DISCUSSION

The use of opioids is more common in people with IBD than in people without IBD. This does not appear to be driven by psychiatric comorbidity.

Patient interpretations of patient-reported outcome measures to assess bowel urgency: qualitative interviews in ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVES

Bowel urgency is an impactful core symptom of ulcerative colitis (UC). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires have been developed and used to assess the patient experience of this important symptom. The objective of this paper is to present evidence from qualitative research conducted to support the use and interpretation of select PRO questionnaires to assess bowel urgency related to the UC patient experience.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews were conducted with ten adults with a clinician-confirmed diagnosis of moderately to severely active UC. Interviews aimed to document patient interpretation of modified recall periods for the Urgency Numeric Rating Scale (Urgency NRS), two global assessments (i.e., the Patient Global Impression of Severity [PGIS] and Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC]), and four items (Items 11, 16, 23, and 26) of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), and explore the patient perspective of meaningful change on these questionnaires.

RESULTS

Both modified Urgency NRS versions (with 7-day or 3-day recall period) were interpreted as intended by most patients (≥ 88.9%), and slightly more than half of patients (60.0%) reported that the 7-day recall period was more relevant to their bowel urgency experience. Patients reported thinking of bowel urgency (≥ 80.0%) or bowel urgency-related accidents (70.0% of patients) when interpreting the global assessments and IBDQ items. Most patients reported a 1- to 3-point change as the smallest meaningful improvement that would be meaningful on the Urgency NRS (similar to findings on other questionnaires).

CONCLUSION

Adults with UC can understand and respond to the Urgency NRS with modified recall periods (i.e., 7-day or 3-day), interpret the conceptual content of the PGIS, PGIC, and select IBDQ items to be inclusive of bowel urgency and bowel urgency-related accidents, and select answers representing meaningful improvements on the Urgency NRS, PGIS, PGIC, and IBDQ item response scales. These results further contribute patient-centered data to existing UC and bowel urgency research.

Understanding Predictors of Fatigue Over Time in Persons With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The Importance of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms

INTRODUCTION

Fatigue is a complex and frequent symptom in persons with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with detrimental impact. We aimed to determine predictors of fatigue over time.

METHODS

Two hundred forty-seven adults with IBD participated in a prospective study conducted in Manitoba, Canada, providing data at baseline and annually for 3 years. Participants reported fatigue impact (Daily Fatigue Impact Scale [DFIS]), depression and anxiety symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]), and pain (Pain Effects Scale [PES]). Physician-diagnosed comorbidities, IBD characteristics, and physical and cognitive functioning were also assessed. We tested factors associated with fatigue using multivariable generalized linear models that estimated within-person and between-person effects.

RESULTS

Most participants were women (63.2%), White (85.4%), and had Crohn's disease (62%). At baseline, 27.9% reported moderate-severe fatigue impact, 16.7% had clinically elevated anxiety (HADS-A ≥11), and 6.5% had clinically elevated depression (HADS-D ≥11). Overall fatigue burden was stable over time, although approximately half the participants showed improved or worsening fatigue impact between annual visits during the study. On multivariable analysis, participants with a one-point higher HADS-D score had, on average, a 0.63-point higher DFIS score, whereas participants with a one-point higher PES score had a 0.78-point higher DFIS score. Within individuals, a one-point increase in HADS-D scores was associated with 0.61-point higher DFIS scores, in HADS-A scores with 0.23-point higher DFIS scores, and in PES scores with 0.38-point higher DFIS scores. No other variables predicted fatigue.

DISCUSSION

Anxiety, depression, and pain predicted fatigue impact over time in IBD, suggesting that targeting psychological factors and pain for intervention may lessen fatigue burden.

Effect of Suboptimal Disease Control on Patient Quality of Life: Real-World Data from the Observational IBD-PODCAST Canada Trial

BACKGROUND

The real-world application of STRIDE-II treatment targets to identify whether disease control is optimal in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) is not well known.

AIMS

This study aimed to estimate proportions of patients with suboptimally controlled CD and UC in real-world Canadian healthcare settings and the impact on quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

The noninterventional, multicenter, observational IBD-PODCAST Canada study comprised a single study visit involving routine assessments, patient- and clinician-completed questionnaires, and a retrospective chart review. Primary outcomes were proportions of patients with STRIDE-II-based red flags indicative of suboptimal disease control and mean ± standard deviation Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) scores. Secondary outcomes included proportions of patients and clinicians subjectively reporting suboptimal control.

RESULTS

Among 163 enrolled patients from 10 sites, 45/87 patients with CD (51.7%; 95% CI: 40.8%, 62.6%) and 33/76 patients with UC (43.3%; 95% CI: 32.1%, 55.3%) had suboptimal disease control based on STRIDE-II criteria. Suboptimal control was subjectively reported at lower proportions (patients: CD, 15.0%; UC, 18.6%; clinicians: CD, 19.5%; UC, 25.0%). Numerically lower SIBDQ scores were observed with suboptimal control (CD, 43.0 ± 10.8; UC, 42.5 ± 12.0) than with optimal control (CD, 58.2 ± 7.2; UC, 57.8 ± 6.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 50% (CD) and 40% (UC) of patients from real-world Canadian practices had suboptimal disease control based on STRIDE-II criteria. Suboptimal control was underestimated by patients and clinicians and accompanied by reduced QoL, suggesting further efforts to implement STRIDE-II treat-to-target strategies are needed.

Psychometric Performance of Fatigue Scales in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Fatigue is highly prevalent in people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Fatigue scales are important for studies testing fatigue interventions, but information about psychometric properties of many scales is insufficient in IBD. We compared the psychometric properties of multiple generic fatigue scales in participants with IBD.

METHODS

Individuals with IBD (N = 216) completed the Daily Fatigue Impact Scale (DFIS), the vitality subscale of the RAND-36, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) fatigue item twice. A subgroup (n = 84) also completed the Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) once, from which we also scored the 21 items from the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS-IBD). We assessed floor/ceiling effects, construct validity, and internal consistency reliability. Using relative efficiency (RE), we compared discriminating ability and comparative responsiveness of the measures regarding disease activity and employment status and changes.

RESULTS

The FIS, MFIS, and RAND-36-vitality scales did not exhibit floor or ceiling effects. The DFIS showed mild floor effects (19.4%), and the PHQ-9 fatigue item showed floor (18.1%) and ceiling (20.8%) effects. Internal consistency reliability exceeded 0.93 for FIS, MFIS-IBD, and DFIS and was 0.81 for the RAND-36-vitality scale. In the subgroup analysis, the FIS, MFIS-IBD, and DFIS were strongly correlated with each other (r ≥ 0.90). The ability to discriminate between disease activity groups was highest for the FIS and MFIS-IBD, followed by the DFIS. The FIS, MFIS-IBD, and DFIS were responsive to changes in work impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

The FIS, MFIS-IBDs and DFIS had adequate validity and reliability for assessing fatigue in IBD.

Bowel Urgency in Ulcerative Colitis: Current Perspectives and Future Directions

Bowel urgency (BU), the sudden or immediate need for a bowel movement, is one of the most common and disruptive symptoms experienced by patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Distinct from the separate symptom of increased stool frequency, BU has a substantial negative impact on quality of life and psychosocial functioning. Among patients with UC, BU is one of the top reasons for treatment dissatisfaction and one of the symptoms patients most want improved. Patients may not discuss BU often due to embarrassment, and healthcare providers may not address the symptom adequately due to the lack of awareness of validated tools and/or knowledge of the importance of assessing BU. The mechanism of BU in UC is multifactorial and includes inflammatory changes in the rectum that may be linked to hypersensitivity and reduced compliance of the rectum. Responsive and reliable patient-reported outcome measures of BU are needed to provide evidence of treatment benefits in clinical trials and facilitate communication in clinical practice. This review discusses the pathophysiology and clinical importance of BU in UC and its impact on the quality of life and psychosocial functioning. Patient-reported outcome measures developed to assess the severity of BU in UC are discussed alongside overviews of treatment options and clinical guidelines. Implications for the future management of UC from the perspective of BU are also explored.