Effects of social determinants of health on mortality and incident liver-related events and cardiovascular disease in steatotic liver disease

Comparative evaluation of APRI, FIB-4, HFS, and NFS: Scoring tools for liver fibrosis in a Mexican population with MASLD

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Liver fibrosis is a complication of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Given the limitations and risks of liver biopsy, examining noninvasive scoring systems that are affordable for the population is necessary. Our aim was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic yield of the APRI, FIB-4, NAFLD score, and Hepamet fibrosis score instruments for detecting liver fibrosis in Mexican subjects with MASLD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on a sample of subjects with MASLD. Liver fibrosis was calculated through transient liver elastography. Sociodemographic, epidemiologic, and biochemical variables were evaluated. Scores were calculated utilizing the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, the aspartate aminotransaminase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), the Hepamet fibrosis score (HFS), and the NAFLD score (NFS), and then compared. ROC curves were constructed, and the optimum cutoff points were determined utilizing the Youden index. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and likelihood ratio were calculated.

RESULTS

The study included 194 subjects (63% women), of whom 150 (77.3%) were classified with MASLD and 44 (22.7%) as controls with no liver disease. There was a 15.3% prevalence of advanced fibrosis. The cutoff points of 0.57 for APRI, 1.85 for FIB-4, 0.08 for HFS, and -0.058 for NFS showed diagnostic yields with areas under the ROC curves of 0.79, 0.80, 0.70, and 0.68, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The APRI, FIB-4, NFS, and HFS scores are useful for evaluating liver fibrosis in Mexican subjects with MASLD. Better diagnostic yield was found with the FIB-4 and APRI scores.

Envisioning how to advance the MASH field

Since 1980, the cumulative effort of scientists and health-care stakeholders has advanced the prerequisites to address metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), a prevalent chronic non-communicable liver disease. This effort has led to, among others, the approval of the first drug specific for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH; formerly known as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis). Despite substantial progress, MASLD is still a leading cause of advanced chronic liver disease, including primary liver cancer. This Perspective contextualizes the nomenclature change from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease to MASLD and proposes important considerations to accelerate further progress in the field, optimize patient-centric multidisciplinary care pathways, advance pharmacological, behavioural and diagnostic research, and address health disparities. Key regulatory and other steps necessary to optimize the approval and access to upcoming additional pharmacological therapeutic agents for MASH are also outlined. We conclude by calling for increased education and awareness, enhanced health system preparedness, and concerted action by policy-makers to further the public health and policy agenda to achieve at least parity with other non-communicable diseases and to aid in growing the community of practice to reduce the human and economic burden and end the public health threat of MASLD and MASH by 2030.

Material deprivation is associated with liver stiffness and liver-related outcomes in people with HIV

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic status (SES) is a driver of health disparities and chronic diseases. People with HIV (PWH) are at risk for chronic liver diseases. We evaluated the association between low SES and hepatic outcomes in PWH.

METHODS

We included PWH from a prospective cohort. SES was assessed by the Pampalon material and social deprivation index to classify the cohort into quintiles of deprivation. Multivariable linear regression was used to investigate associations of material and social deprivation with liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) as markers of hepatic fibrosis and steatosis, respectively. Incidence of outcomes was evaluated through survival analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 804 PWH included, 45% and 72% were living in areas of the highest material and social deprivation, respectively. Materially deprived PWH were more frequently female and of non-white ethnicity and had higher prevalence of metabolic comorbidities. After adjustments, material deprivation correlated with increased LSM (β = 1.86, 95% CI 0.53-3.17) but not with CAP (β = 6.47, 95% CI -5.55-18.49). Patients were observed for a median follow-up of 3.8 years. Incidence of liver-related events was higher in most materially deprived compared to most privileged PWH (hazard ratio 3.03, 95% CI 1.03-8.92), while there was no difference in extrahepatic outcomes or all-cause mortality. Social deprivation showed no association with either LSM or clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Living in materially deprived neighbourhoods as a proxy for lower SES, is associated with LSM and liver-related events in PWH. Future strategies should explore mechanisms underlying these relationships and whether enhanced material security improves hepatic outcomes.

Food inequity and insecurity and MASLD: burden, challenges, and interventions

Liver disease prevalence, severity, outcomes and hepatic risk factors (for example, unhealthy diet) are heavily affected by socioeconomic status and food insecurity. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is the most prevalent liver disease globally and is likely to co-occur with other liver diseases associated with food insecurity. Though weight reduction and adopting a healthy diet can reverse the course of MASLD, gaps between recommendations and practice transcend individual responsibility and preference. Broader sociocultural determinants of food choices (social nutrition) include food insecurity, community and social norms and the local environment, including commercial pressures that target people experiencing poverty, ethnic minorities and children. Food insecurity is a barrier to a healthy diet, as a low-quality diet is often less expensive than a healthy one. Consequently, food insecurity is an 'upstream' risk factor for MASLD, advanced fibrosis and greater all-cause mortality among patients with liver disease. Intervening on food insecurity at four major levels (environment, policy, community and health care) can reduce the burden of liver disease, thereby reducing social and health inequities. In this Review, we report on the current research in the field, the need for implementing proven interventions, and the role liver specialists can have.

Population screening for cirrhosis

In response to the growing health crisis of liver-related morbidity and mortality, screening for liver cirrhosis has emerged as a promising strategy for early detection and timely intervention. By identifying individuals with severe fibrosis or compensated cirrhosis, screening holds the promise of enhancing treatment outcomes, delaying disease progression, and ultimately improving the quality of life of affected individuals. Clinical practice guidelines from international scientific societies currently recommend targeted screening strategies, investigating high-risk populations with known risk factors of liver disease. While there is good evidence that screening increases case finding in the population, and a growing number of studies indicate that screening may motivate beneficial lifestyle changes in patients with steatotic liver disease, there are major gaps in knowledge in need of clarification before screening programs of cirrhosis are implemented. Foremost, randomized trials are needed to ensure that screening leads to improved liver-related morbidity and mortality. If not, screening for cirrhosis could be unethical due to overdiagnosis, overtreatment, increased health care costs, negative psychological consequences of screening, and futile invasive investigations. Moreover, the tests used for screening need to be optimized toward lower false positive rates than the currently used FIB-4 while retaining few false negatives. Finally, barriers to adherence to screening and implementation of screening programs need to be elucidated. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current landscape of screening strategies for liver cirrhosis and the promises and pitfalls of current methods for early cirrhosis detection.

Editorial: Crystalising the burden of steatotic liver disease-Authors' reply

This article is linked to Schneider et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17958 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17986

Screening for social determinants of health among populations at risk for MASLD: a scoping review

Background

Social determinants of health (SDoH) have been associated with disparate outcomes among those with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and its risk factors. To address SDoH among this population, real-time SDoH screening in clinical settings is required, yet optimal screening methods are unclear. We performed a scoping review to describe the current literature on SDoH screening conducted in the clinical setting among individuals with MASLD and MASLD risk factors.

Methods

Through a systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL Complete databases through 7/2023, we identified studies with clinic-based SDoH screening among individuals with or at risk for MASLD that reported pertinent clinical outcomes including change in MASLD risk factors like diabetes and hypertension.

Results

Ten studies (8 manuscripts, 2 abstracts) met inclusion criteria involving 148,151 patients: 89,408 with diabetes and 25,539 with hypertension. Screening was primarily completed in primary care clinics, and a variety of screening tools were used. The most commonly collected SDoH were financial stability, healthcare access, food insecurity and transportation. Associations between clinical outcomes and SDoH varied; overall, higher SDoH burden was associated with poorer outcomes including elevated blood pressure and hemoglobin A1c.

Conclusion

Despite numerous epidemiologic studies showing associations between clinical outcomes and SDoH, and guidelines recommending SDoH screening, few studies describe in-clinic SDoH screening among individuals with MASLD risk factors and none among patients with MASLD. Future research should prioritize real-time, comprehensive assessments of SDoH, particularly among patients at risk for and with MASLD, to mitigate disease progression and reduce MASLD health disparities.

Comparison of NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD characteristics and mortality outcomes in United States adults

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Following the classification of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has recently been redefined again as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). However, the distinctions in characteristics and mortality outcomes between NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD remain unclear.

METHODS

We analysed data from 7519 participants in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys of United States (US) and their linked mortality until 2019. Survey weight-adjusted multivariable Cox proportional model was used to study the mortality over three terms.

RESULTS

The prevalence of NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD was 18.5%, 19.3% and 20.8%, respectively. Most individuals with NAFLD (94.5%) or MAFLD (100%) can be classified as MASLD, while a relatively low percentage of those with MASLD were also diagnosed with either NAFLD (84.1%) or MAFLD (92.7%). During a median follow-up of 26.9 years, both MAFLD and MASLD were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.18, 95% CI 1.04-1.33 and 1.19, 1.06-1.34, respectively), this association was mainly observed in NAFLD-/MASLD+ subgroups. NAFLD was not associated with all-cause mortality. However, all three terms were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in individuals with advanced fibrosis (aHR: 1.71-1.81). Subgroup analyses showed that higher risk of all-cause mortality for both MAFLD and MASLD were observed among older adults (≥65 year), non-Hispanic whites and those without diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Both MASLD and MALFD were linked to higher all-cause mortality risk, but MASLD identified a greater number of individuals compared to MAFLD.

Editorial: Assessing advanced fibrosis in metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease-the MAFLD fibrosis score. Authors' reply

This article is linked to Cheung et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17722 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17744