Perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Comparative assessments between complex and non-complex renal tumors

Impacts of completely endophytic renal masses on perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The objective of this study was to perform a comprehensive pooled analysis aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) between completely endophytic tumors (CERT) and non-completely endophytic tumors (non-CERT).

Methods

This study adhered rigorously to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis. We performed a systematic search in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, focusing on studies published in English up to May 2024. Our analysis primarily evaluated key outcomes, specifically perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes.

Results

A total of 2126 patients across six studies were included in the analysis. Compared to non-CERT, CERT was associated with significantly higher rates of major complications (Odds Ratio [OR]: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.14 to 5.34; p = 0.02), longer warm ischemia times (Weighted Mean Difference [WMD]: 3.27 min; 95% CI: 0.61 to 5.39; p = 0.02), a greater decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (WMD: 2.93 ml/min/1.73 m2; 95% CI: 0.75 to 5.11; p = 0.008), and relatively lower trifecta achievement rates (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.96; p = 0.03). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of operative time, length of stay, blood loss, transfusion rates, intraoperative complications, overall complications, positive surgical margins, and local recurrence.

Conclusions

Although CERT was associated with greater declines in eGFR and lower rates of trifecta achievement, it yielded perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes comparable to those of non-CERT in RAPN. Our findings suggest that RAPN for completely endophytic renal masses can achieve acceptable outcomes when performed in centers with substantial expertise in robotic surgery.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=555067, identifier CRD42024555067.

Early experience and future prospects regarding use of newly developed surgical robot system, hinotori, in the field of urologic cancer surgery

In the field of urology, robotic surgery has gained rapid and wide acceptance as a standard surgical approach in the majority of major surgeries over the last decade. To date, the da Vinci surgical system has been the dominant platform in robotic surgery; however, several newly developed robotic systems have recently been introduced in routine clinical practice. Of these, hinotori, the first made-in-Japan robotic system, is characterized by various unique and attractive features different from the existing system, and the use of this system has gradually increased mainly in urologic cancer surgeries, including radical prostatectomy, partial nephrectomy, radical nephrectomy, and radical nephroureterectomy. This review initially describes detailed characteristics of hinotori, then summarizes the early experience with urologic cancer surgeries using hinotori at our institution, and finally discusses the future prospects of robotic surgery using hinotori, considering problems associated with the use of this robotic system.

Perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for special types of renal tumors (hilar, endophytic, or cystic): an evidence-based analysis of comparative outcomes

Purpose

This study aims to perform a pooled analysis to compare the outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) between complex tumors (hilar, endophytic, or cystic) and non-complex tumors (nonhilar, exophytic, or solid) and evaluate the effects of renal tumor complexity on outcomes in patients undergoing RAPN.

Methods

Four databases were systematically searched, including Science, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, to identify relevant studies published in English up to December 2022. Review Manager 5.4 was used for statistical analyses and calculations. The study was registered with PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42023394792).

Results

In total, 14 comparative trials, including 3758 patients were enrolled. Compared to non-complex tumors, complex tumors were associated with a significantly longer warm ischemia time (WMD 3.67 min, 95% CI 1.78, 5.57; p = 0.0001), more blood loss (WMD 22.84 mL, 95% CI 2.31, 43.37; p = 0.03), and a higher rate of major complications (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.50, 3.67; p = 0.0002). However, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in operative time, length of stay, transfusion rates, conversion to open nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy rates, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline, intraoperative complication, overall complication, positive surgical margins (PSM), local recurrence, and trifecta achievement.

Conclusions

RAPN can be a safe and effective procedure for complex tumors (hilar, endophytic, or cystic) and provides comparable functional and oncologic outcomes to non-complex tumors.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=394792, identifier CRD42023394792.

Initial experience of robot-assisted radical nephrectomy in Japan: Single institutional study of 12 cases

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the initial experience of robot-assisted radical nephrectomy (RARN) in a single institution in Japan.

METHODS

This study included a total of 12 patients with renal tumors who were not preoperatively regarded as optimal candidates for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and subsequently treated with RARN between April 2019 and June 2021 at our institution. Comprehensive perioperative outcomes in these patients were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 12 included patients, 10 and two were male and female, respectively, and the median age was 66 years. The median tumor diameter was 44 mm, and four, four and four patients were classified into cT1a, cT1b and cT3a, respectively. There was no patient requiring open conversion, and the median operative and console times were 167 and 79 minutes, respectively. The median estimated blood loss was 42 cc, and no patient required blood transfusion. During the perioperative period, no major complication corresponding to Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 occurred. Nine, two and one patient were pathologically diagnosed with clear cell carcinoma (CCC), non-CCC and benign cyst, respectively, and there was no patient who developed recurrent diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering complicated tumor characteristics not amenable to RAPN in this series, such as an intravenous tumor thrombus or previous history of open partial nephrectomy, perioperative outcomes of initial experience with RARN in Japan could be considered favorable. Collectively, these findings suggest that RARN may be a promising alternative to laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for patients with complicated renal tumors, contraindicated for RAPN.