1
|
Katiyar SK, Gaur SN, Solanki RN, Sarangdhar N, Suri JC, Kumar R, Khilnani GC, Chaudhary D, Singla R, Koul PA, Mahashur AA, Ghoshal AG, Behera D, Christopher DJ, Talwar D, Ganguly D, Paramesh H, Gupta KB, Kumar T M, Motiani PD, Shankar PS, Chawla R, Guleria R, Jindal SK, Luhadia SK, Arora VK, Vijayan VK, Faye A, Jindal A, Murar AK, Jaiswal A, M A, Janmeja AK, Prajapat B, Ravindran C, Bhattacharyya D, D'Souza G, Sehgal IS, Samaria JK, Sarma J, Singh L, Sen MK, Bainara MK, Gupta M, Awad NT, Mishra N, Shah NN, Jain N, Mohapatra PR, Mrigpuri P, Tiwari P, Narasimhan R, Kumar RV, Prasad R, Swarnakar R, Chawla RK, Kumar R, Chakrabarti S, Katiyar S, Mittal S, Spalgais S, Saha S, Kant S, Singh VK, Hadda V, Kumar V, Singh V, Chopra V, B V. Indian Guidelines on Nebulization Therapy. Indian J Tuberc 2022; 69 Suppl 1:S1-S191. [PMID: 36372542 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijtb.2022.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Inhalational therapy, today, happens to be the mainstay of treatment in obstructive airway diseases (OADs), such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and is also in the present, used in a variety of other pulmonary and even non-pulmonary disorders. Hand-held inhalation devices may often be difficult to use, particularly for children, elderly, debilitated or distressed patients. Nebulization therapy emerges as a good option in these cases besides being useful in the home care, emergency room and critical care settings. With so many advancements taking place in nebulizer technology; availability of a plethora of drug formulations for its use, and the widening scope of this therapy; medical practitioners, respiratory therapists, and other health care personnel face the challenge of choosing appropriate inhalation devices and drug formulations, besides their rational application and use in different clinical situations. Adequate maintenance of nebulizer equipment including their disinfection and storage are the other relevant issues requiring guidance. Injudicious and improper use of nebulizers and their poor maintenance can sometimes lead to serious health hazards, nosocomial infections, transmission of infection, and other adverse outcomes. Thus, it is imperative to have a proper national guideline on nebulization practices to bridge the knowledge gaps amongst various health care personnel involved in this practice. It will also serve as an educational and scientific resource for healthcare professionals, as well as promote future research by identifying neglected and ignored areas in this field. Such comprehensive guidelines on this subject have not been available in the country and the only available proper international guidelines were released in 1997 which have not been updated for a noticeably long period of over two decades, though many changes and advancements have taken place in this technology in the recent past. Much of nebulization practices in the present may not be evidence-based and even some of these, the way they are currently used, may be ineffective or even harmful. Recognizing the knowledge deficit and paucity of guidelines on the usage of nebulizers in various settings such as inpatient, out-patient, emergency room, critical care, and domiciliary use in India in a wide variety of indications to standardize nebulization practices and to address many other related issues; National College of Chest Physicians (India), commissioned a National task force consisting of eminent experts in the field of Pulmonary Medicine from different backgrounds and different parts of the country to review the available evidence from the medical literature on the scientific principles and clinical practices of nebulization therapy and to formulate evidence-based guidelines on it. The guideline is based on all possible literature that could be explored with the best available evidence and incorporating expert opinions. To support the guideline with high-quality evidence, a systematic search of the electronic databases was performed to identify the relevant studies, position papers, consensus reports, and recommendations published. Rating of the level of the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendation was done using the GRADE system. Six topics were identified, each given to one group of experts comprising of advisors, chairpersons, convenor and members, and such six groups (A-F) were formed and the consensus recommendations of each group was included as a section in the guidelines (Sections I to VI). The topics included were: A. Introduction, basic principles and technical aspects of nebulization, types of equipment, their choice, use, and maintenance B. Nebulization therapy in obstructive airway diseases C. Nebulization therapy in the intensive care unit D. Use of various drugs (other than bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids) by nebulized route and miscellaneous uses of nebulization therapy E. Domiciliary/Home/Maintenance nebulization therapy; public & health care workers education, and F. Nebulization therapy in COVID-19 pandemic and in patients of other contagious viral respiratory infections (included later considering the crisis created due to COVID-19 pandemic). Various issues in different sections have been discussed in the form of questions, followed by point-wise evidence statements based on the existing knowledge, and recommendations have been formulated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S K Katiyar
- Department of Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases, G.S.V.M. Medical College & C.S.J.M. University, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
| | - S N Gaur
- Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Respiratory Medicine, School of Medical Sciences and Research, Sharda University, Greater NOIDA, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - R N Solanki
- Department of Tuberculosis & Chest Diseases, B. J. Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Nikhil Sarangdhar
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, D. Y. Patil School of Medicine, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - J C Suri
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Raj Kumar
- Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, National Centre of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology; University of Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - G C Khilnani
- PSRI Institute of Pulmonary, Critical Care, & Sleep Medicine, PSRI Hospital, Department of Pulmonary Medicine & Sleep Disorders, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Dhruva Chaudhary
- Department of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Pt. Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India
| | - Rupak Singla
- Department of Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases, National Institute of Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases (formerly L.R.S. Institute), Delhi, India
| | - Parvaiz A Koul
- Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India
| | - Ashok A Mahashur
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, P. D. Hinduja Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - A G Ghoshal
- National Allergy Asthma Bronchitis Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - D Behera
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - D J Christopher
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Deepak Talwar
- Metro Centre for Respiratory Diseases, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | | | - H Paramesh
- Paediatric Pulmonologist & Environmentalist, Lakeside Hospital & Education Trust, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - K B Gupta
- Department of Tuberculosis & Respiratory Medicine, Pt. Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences Rohtak, Haryana, India
| | - Mohan Kumar T
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, One Care Medical Centre, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - P D Motiani
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Dr. S. N. Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | - P S Shankar
- SCEO, KBN Hospital, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India
| | - Rajesh Chawla
- Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Randeep Guleria
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Pulmonary Medicine & Sleep Disorders, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | - S K Jindal
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - S K Luhadia
- Department of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Medicine, Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
| | - V K Arora
- Indian Journal of Tuberculosis, Santosh University, NCR Delhi, National Institute of TB & Respiratory Diseases Delhi, India; JIPMER, Puducherry, India
| | - V K Vijayan
- Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Abhishek Faye
- Centre for Lung and Sleep Disorders, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | | | - Amit K Murar
- Respiratory Medicine, Cronus Multi-Specialty Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Anand Jaiswal
- Respiratory & Sleep Medicine, Medanta Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
| | - Arunachalam M
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - A K Janmeja
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Government Medical College, Chandigarh, India
| | - Brijesh Prajapat
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Yashoda Hospital and Research Centre, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - C Ravindran
- Department of TB & Chest, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India
| | - Debajyoti Bhattacharyya
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Army Hospital (Research & Referral), New Delhi, India
| | | | - Inderpaul Singh Sehgal
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - J K Samaria
- Centre for Research and Treatment of Allergy, Asthma & Bronchitis, Department of Chest Diseases, IMS, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Jogesh Sarma
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India
| | - Lalit Singh
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, SRMS Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - M K Sen
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, ESIC Medical College, NIT Faridabad, Haryana, India; Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Mahendra K Bainara
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, R.N.T. Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Mansi Gupta
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi PostGraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Nilkanth T Awad
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Narayan Mishra
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, M.K.C.G. Medical College, Berhampur, Orissa, India
| | - Naveed N Shah
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Chest Diseases Hospital, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India
| | - Neetu Jain
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, PSRI, New Delhi, India
| | - Prasanta R Mohapatra
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine & Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Orissa, India
| | - Parul Mrigpuri
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Pawan Tiwari
- School of Excellence in Pulmonary Medicine, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - R Narasimhan
- Department of EBUS and Bronchial Thermoplasty Services at Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - R Vijai Kumar
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, MediCiti Medical College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Rajendra Prasad
- Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi and U.P. Rural Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Safai, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Rajesh Swarnakar
- Department of Respiratory, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and Interventional Pulmonology, Getwell Hospital & Research Institute, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Rakesh K Chawla
- Department of, Respiratory Medicine, Critical Care, Sleep & Interventional Pulmonology, Saroj Super Speciality Hospital, Jaipur Golden Hospital, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - Rohit Kumar
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - S Chakrabarti
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Saurabh Mittal
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sonam Spalgais
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
| | | | - Surya Kant
- Department of Respiratory (Pulmonary) Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - V K Singh
- Centre for Visceral Mechanisms, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Vijay Hadda
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine & Sleep Disorders, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Vikas Kumar
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
| | - Virendra Singh
- Mahavir Jaipuria Rajasthan Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Vishal Chopra
- Department of Chest & Tuberculosis, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India
| | - Visweswaran B
- Interventional Pulmonology, Yashoda Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen YL, Wang W, Shi L, Eddy J. An ultrasensitive LC-MS/MS method and application to clinical dose-range finding for glycopyrrolate via an e-Nebulizer. Bioanalysis 2021; 13:959-968. [PMID: 34085852 DOI: 10.4155/bio-2021-0037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Glycopyrrolate (GLY) has been widely used to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Recent technical advancement significantly improves the drug delivery efficiency. In a clinical dose-range determination study via electronic nebulizer, the starting dose was as low as 3-μg, thus, a bioanalytical method capable of measuring down to sub-pg/ml or fg/ml level was required to characterize pharmacokinetics of GLY. Methods: A straightforward solid-phase extraction coupled with reversed-phase LC-MS/MS method was successfully developed to quantify plasma GLY concentrations of 0.500-250 pg/mL. MS/MS detection was at ESI+ by monitoring m/z 318.3→116.1 for GLY and 321.3→119.1 for the internal standard GLY-d3. Results and Conclusion: The method was validated with adequate selectivity, intra- and inter-assay precision and accuracy, dilution linearity, and sufficient stability for measuring GLY in human plasma. This method has been used for sample analysis of a clinical dose-range finding study (3-50 µg twice daily doses via an electronic nebulizer). The assay exhibited good precision, accuracy, and robustness. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed good dose proportionality over the studied dose range, where Cmax was found to be Y = 1.354*X + 1.968 (r2 = 0.9984), and AUC0-12 h was Y = 4.661*X + 23.32 (r2 = 0.9976). The study clearly demonstrated the importance of an ultrasensitive (500 fg/ml LLOQ) method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Luan Chen
- Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., 84 Waterford Drive, Marlborough, MA 01752, USA
| | - Weimin Wang
- Frontage Laboratories, 700 Pennsylvania Drive, Exton, PA 19341, USA
| | - Lei Shi
- Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., 84 Waterford Drive, Marlborough, MA 01752, USA
| | - John Eddy
- Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., 84 Waterford Drive, Marlborough, MA 01752, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dean J, Panainte C, Khan N, Singh D. The TRIFLOW study: a randomised, cross-over study evaluating the effects of extrafine beclometasone/formoterol/glycopyrronium on gas trapping in COPD. Respir Res 2020; 21:323. [PMID: 33298062 PMCID: PMC7727250 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-020-01589-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The effects of triple therapy on gas trapping in COPD are not fully understood. We evaluated the effects of the long acting bronchodilator components of the extrafine single inhaler triple therapy beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol/glycopyrronium (BDP/F/G) pMDI on gas trapping. Methods This open-label, randomised, single centre, 2-way cross-over study recruited 23 COPD patients taking inhaled corticosteroid combination treatments and with residual volume (RV) > 120% predicted at screening. Inhaled BDP was taken during run-in and washout periods. Baseline lung function (spirometry, lung volumes, oscillometry) was measured over 12 h prior to randomisation to BDP/F/G or BDP/F for 5 days followed by washout and crossover. Lung function was measured prior to dosing on day 1 and for 12 h post-dose on day 5. Results Co-primary endpoint analysis: BDP/F/G had a greater effect than BDP/F on FEV1 area under the curve over 12 h (AUC0–12) (mean difference 104 mls, p = 0.0071) and RV AUC0–12 (mean difference − 163 mls, p = 0.0028). Oscillometry measurements showed a greater effect of BDP/F/G on the difference between resistance at 5 and 20 Hz (R5–R20) AUC0–12, which measures small airway resistance (mean difference − 0.045 kPa/L/s, p = 0.0002). Comparison of BDP/F with the baseline measurements (BDP alone) showed that F increased FEV1 AUC0–12 (mean difference 227 mls) and improved RV AUC0–12 (mean difference − 558 mls) and R5–R20 AUC0–12 (mean difference − 0.117 kPa/L/s), all p < 0.0001. Conclusions In COPD patients with hyperinflation, the G and F components of extrafine BDP/F/G improved FEV1, RV and small airway function. These long acting bronchodilators target small airway function, thereby improving gas trapping and airflow. Trial registration The study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 15th February 2019 (No.: NCT03842904, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03842904).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Dean
- Medicines Evaluation Unit, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9QZ, UK.
| | | | - Naimat Khan
- Medicines Evaluation Unit, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9QZ, UK
| | - Dave Singh
- Medicines Evaluation Unit, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9QZ, UK.,Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester and Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ohar JA, Bauer A, Sharma S, Sanjar S. In Vitro Effect of Different Airflow Rates on the Aerosol Properties of Nebulized Glycopyrrolate in the eFlow® Closed System and Tiotropium Delivered in the HandiHaler®. Pulm Ther 2020; 6:289-301. [PMID: 32809156 PMCID: PMC7672140 DOI: 10.1007/s41030-020-00125-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Personalized therapy for patients with COPD requires appropriate choice of drug and delivery device. Inhalers and nebulizers vary in their drug delivery characteristics, particularly the need for passive or active patient inhalation for appropriate drug dispersal and delivery. In this in vitro analysis, we assessed the aerosol performance and drug delivery of two long-acting muscarinic antagonists, glycopyrrolate (GLY; 25 µg solution; 1 ml) and tiotropium (TIO; 18 µg powder) through their respective delivery systems: the eFlow® Closed System (CS) vibrating membrane nebulizer and the HandiHaler® dry-powder inhaler (DPI). METHODS The aerosol performances of the eFlow® CS nebulizer and the HandiHaler® were determined using the Next Generation cascade Impactor. The delivered dose of GLY and TIO was determined using different breathing patterns, which varied in tidal volume and peak inspiratory flow rate, respectively, to simulate breathing conditions ranging from normal to severe obstruction. RESULTS Aerodynamic particle analysis showed generally similar mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD, range, 3.6-4.6 µm) and fine particle fraction (FPF, range, 48.2%-63.7%) with GLY delivered using the eFlow® CS nebulizer under all breathing patterns tested. TIO, delivered via the HandiHaler®, showed variations in MMAD (range, 3.8-5.8 µm) and FPF (range, 16.1%-32.4%) under different inspiratory flow rates. The majority of GLY was deposited in stages 2-5 of the impactor, which corresponds with particle sizes in the respirable range (< 5 µm), whereas a large proportion of TIO was deposited in the throat/mouthpiece pre-separator, irrespective of test conditions. The median residual dose of GLY with eFlow® CS was notably lower compared to that of TIO with HandiHaler® (2.4%-4.4% vs. 40%-67%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS These simulation results highlight the different deposition patterns generated by a DPI device and a vibrating membrane nebulizer, which may help inform device selection and treatment decision in COPD management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill A Ohar
- Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
| | - Andrea Bauer
- Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shi L, Ngounou Wetie AG, Wang W, Chen Y. Validation of a sensitive and specific LC–MS/MS method and application to evaluate the systemic exposure and bioavailability of glycopyrrolate via different drug delivery approaches/devices. Biomed Chromatogr 2020; 34:e4899. [DOI: 10.1002/bmc.4899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Revised: 05/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Shi
- Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc 84 Waterford Drive Marlborough MA 01752 USA
| | | | - Weimin Wang
- Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc 84 Waterford Drive Marlborough MA 01752 USA
| | - Yu‐Luan Chen
- Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc 84 Waterford Drive Marlborough MA 01752 USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Evaluation of systemic absorption and bronchodilator effect of glycopyrronium bromide delivered by nebulizer or a dry powder inhaler in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Res 2019; 20:132. [PMID: 31253162 PMCID: PMC6599298 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-019-1113-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Effective bronchodilator therapy depends upon adequate drug deposition in the lung. COPD patients who are unable to administer medications efficiently with conventional inhalers may benefit from the use of a nebulizer device. The aim of this study was to evaluate the systemic bioavailability and bronchodilator response of glycopyrronium bromide (GLY) administered by a novel nebulizer (eFlow® closed system [CS] vibrating membrane nebulizer) or dry powder inhaler (DPI) in subjects with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods In this randomized, open-label, single-dose, five-way crossover study, subjects received a sequence of either 50 μg GLY delivered by eFlow CS nebulizer (GLY/eFlow) or 63 μg GLY delivered by DPI (GLY/DPI), with and without activated charcoal, followed by intravenous infusion of 50 μg GLY with a washout period of 7 days between doses. Endpoints included plasma pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy. Results The mean (± SD) baseline predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of the 30 subjects who completed the study was 51 ± 15%, with a FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio of 50 ± 11%. Without charcoal, the absolute systemic bioavailability of GLY/eFlow and GLY/DPI were approximately 15 and 22%, respectively. Changes from baseline in FEV1 at 60 min post-dose, without administration of charcoal, were 0.180 L and 0.220 L for GLY/eFlow and GLY/DPI, respectively; FEV1 improvements were similar when charcoal was administered (0.220 L for both GLY/eFlow and GLY/DPI). There were no significant differences in spirometry between the two devices. Fewer subjects administered GLY/eFlow reported adverse events (n = 15) than GLY/DPI (n = 18). Conclusions After single doses, GLY/DPI delivered numerically higher peak and steady state levels of drug than did GLY/eFlow. Nebulized GLY produced similar bronchodilation but lower systemic levels of drug than GLY/DPI. Slightly higher number of subjects reported adverse events with GLY/DPI than with GLY/eFlow. Nebulized GLY may offer an effective alternative to patients with COPD not adequately treated with other devices. Trial registration NCT02512302 (ClinicalTrials.gov). Registered 28 May 2015. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-019-1113-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
7
|
Pleasants RA. Glycopyrrolate/eFlow CS: The First Nebulized Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist Approved to Treat Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Ann Pharmacother 2019; 53:285-293. [PMID: 30175596 PMCID: PMC6357169 DOI: 10.1177/1060028018798753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of the first nebulized long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), glycopyrrolate (GLY)/eFlow closed system (CS) nebulizer, approved for maintenance treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). DATA SOURCES A PubMed search was conducted (January 2000 to July 2018) using the following terms/phrases: nebulized glycopyrrolate, inhalation devices in COPD, long-acting muscarinic antagonists COPD, and COPD survey. Retrieved articles were reviewed to identify additional references. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION Primary and review articles on GLY/eFlow CS and other treatment options for patients with COPD were selected. DATA SYNTHESIS Guidelines recommend the use of LAMAs, alone or in combination with long-acting β2-agonists, as maintenance therapy for the majority of patients with COPD. With the range of different devices and bronchodilators now available, treatment can be tailored based on individual needs. The eFlow CS nebulizer delivers GLY rapidly over a 2- to 3-minute period and provides bronchodilation within 30 minutes, lasting 12 hours. Phase 2 dose-finding and phase 3 studies demonstrated sustained statistically significant and clinically important improvements in pulmonary function and patient-reported outcomes with GLY/eFlow CS. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: GLY/eFlow CS provides a novel, portable, efficient, and rapid drug delivery system. CONCLUSIONS The recently approved GLY/eFlow CS drug-device combination provides a viable treatment option for patients with COPD, particularly those with conditions that may impair proper use of traditional handheld inhalers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy A. Pleasants
- Duke Clinical Research Institute and Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Singh D, Ravi A, Kane K, Schmalbach T, Hava DL. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of PUR0200, a novel tiotropium formulation, in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2018; 84:2097-2105. [PMID: 29790581 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2018] [Revised: 04/24/2018] [Accepted: 05/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS PUR0200 is a tiotropium bromide formulation engineered with the iSPERSE dry powder delivery technology. PUR0200 is being developed as a bioequivalent alternative to tiotropium bromide, delivered using Spiriva® HandiHaler® (HH). We investigated the bronchodilator effects, pharmacokinetics and safety of PUR0200 in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study using different PUR0200 doses and the comparator tiotropium HH. In vitro aerodynamic particle size distribution (aPSD) characterization of PUR0200 and tiotropium HH are presented. The main endpoints included forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ) trough and (0-24 h) and pharmacokinetic parameters. RESULTS The increased fine-particle fraction of PUR0200 demonstrated by testing using the next-generation impactor increased the proportion of drug available for lung deposition compared with the tiotropium HH. There was a numerical dose-response effect for PUR0200 on FEV1 , with 3 μg demonstrating a lower effect than higher doses. The placebo-adjusted mean (95% confidence interval) increases from baseline at 24 h postdose were 150 ml (100-200), 210 ml (160-270) and 200 ml (140-250) for 3 μg, 6 μg and 9 μg doses of PUR0200, respectively. Tiotropium HH (18 μg) caused a mean 169 ml (standard deviation 157ml) improvement in trough FEV1 , which was not significantly different to the PUR0200 effects at any of the tested doses. CONCLUSIONS PUR0200 treatment caused bronchodilation in COPD patients that was similar in magnitude to that caused by tiotropium HH. This enabled a similar clinical effect on lung function to be achieved with PUR0200 using a lower metered dose of tiotropium compared with tiotropium HH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dave Singh
- University of Manchester, Medicines Evaluation Unit, The Langley Building, Wythenshawe Hospital, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9QZ, UK
| | - Arjun Ravi
- University of Manchester, Medicines Evaluation Unit, The Langley Building, Wythenshawe Hospital, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9QZ, UK
| | - Katie Kane
- Pulmatrix Inc, 99 Hayden Ave, Suite 390, Lexington, MA, 02421, USA
| | - Tess Schmalbach
- Pulmatrix Inc, 99 Hayden Ave, Suite 390, Lexington, MA, 02421, USA
| | - David L Hava
- Pulmatrix Inc, 99 Hayden Ave, Suite 390, Lexington, MA, 02421, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION COPD is highly prevalent in the US and globally, requiring new treatment strategies due to the high disease burden and increase in the aging population. Here, we profile the newly FDA-approved LONHALA MAGNAIR (glycopyrrolate [GLY]/eFlow® Closed System [CS]; 25 mcg twice daily), a nebulized long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) for the long-term maintenance treatment of COPD, including chronic bronchitis and/or emphysema. Areas covered: An overview of COPD and treatment landscape, focusing on GLY/eFlow CS, reviewing the published literature pertinent to the drug/device combination is reported. Expert commentary: GLY/eFlow CS consists of glycopyrrolate delivered via a novel electronic nebulizer and is the first nebulized LAMA to be approved by the FDA. GLY/eFlow CS has been studied in an extensive clinical development program, including phase II dose-ranging studies, two 12-week phase III studies demonstrating statistically significant and clinically important improvements in pulmonary function and patient-reported outcomes with a well-tolerated safety profile, and a 48-week phase III study highlighting the long-term safety of GLY/eFlow CS, along with long-term improvements in lung function and patient-reported outcomes. Additional studies are required to assess the impact of GLY/eFlow CS on COPD exacerbations, identify alternative uses of the eFlow CS nebulizer, and direct comparisons to other LAMAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Kerwin
- a Clinical Research Institute of Southern Oregon, Inc ., Medford , OR , USA
| | - Gary T Ferguson
- b Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan , Farmington Hills , MI , USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Beeh KM, Emirova A, Prunier H, Santoro D, Nandeuil MA. Dose-response of an extrafine dry powder inhaler formulation of glycopyrronium bromide: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study (GlycoNEXT). Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2018; 13:1701-1711. [PMID: 29872288 PMCID: PMC5973313 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s168493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction An extrafine formulation of the long-acting muscarinic antagonist, glycopyrronium bromide (GB), has been developed for delivery via the NEXThaler dry powder inhaler (DPI). This study assessed the bronchodilator efficacy and safety of different doses of this formulation in patients with COPD to identify the optimal dose for further development. Patients and methods This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, incomplete block, three-way crossover study, including three 28-day treatment periods, each separated by a 21-day washout period. Eligible patients had a diagnosis of COPD and post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 40%-70% predicted. Treatments administered were GB 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 μg or matched placebo; all were given twice daily (BID) via DPI, with spirometry assessed on Days 1 and 28 of each treatment period. The primary end point was FEV1 area under the curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC0-12 h) on Day 28. Results A total of 202 patients were randomized (61% male, mean age 62.6 years), with 178 (88%) completing all the three treatment periods. For the primary end point, all the four GB doses were superior to placebo (p<0.001) with mean differences (95% CI) of 114 (74, 154), 125 (85, 166), 143 (104, 183) and 187 (147, 228) mL for GB 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 μg BID, respectively. All four GB doses were also statistically superior to placebo for all secondary efficacy end points, showing clear dose-response relationships for most of the endpoints. Accordingly, GB 25 μg BID met the criteria for the minimally acceptable dose. Adverse events were reported by 15.5, 16.2, 10.9 and 14.3% of patients receiving GB 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 μg BID, respectively, and 14.8% receiving placebo. Conclusion This study supports the selection of GB 25 μg BID as the minimal effective dose for patients with COPD when delivered with this extrafine DPI formulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai M Beeh
- Insaf Respiratory Research Institute, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Aida Emirova
- Global Clinical Development, Chiesi S.A.S, Bois-Colombes, France
| | - Hélène Prunier
- Global Clinical Development, Chiesi S.A.S, Bois-Colombes, France
| | - Debora Santoro
- Global Clinical Development, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Santus P, Radovanovic D, Cristiano A, Valenti V, Rizzi M. Role of nebulized glycopyrrolate in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Drug Des Devel Ther 2017; 11:3257-3271. [PMID: 29180850 PMCID: PMC5695264 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s135377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
In the upcoming years, the proportion of elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) will increase, according to the progressively aging population and the increased efficacy of the pharmacological treatments, especially considering the management of chronic comorbidities. The issue to prescribe an appropriate inhalation therapy to COPD patients with significant handling or coordination difficulties represents a common clinical experience; in the latter case, the choice of an inadequate inhalation device may jeopardize the adherence to the treatment and eventually lead to its ineffectiveness. Treatment options that do not require particular timing for coordination between activation and/or inhalation or require high flow thresholds to be activated should represent the best treatment option for these patients. Nebulized bronchodilators, usually used only in acute conditions such as COPD exacerbations, could fulfill this gap, enabling an adequate drug administration during tidal breathing and without the need for patients' cooperation. However, so far, only short-acting muscarinic antagonists have been available for nebulization. Recently, a nebulized formulation of the inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonist glycopyrrolate, delivered by means of a novel proprietary vibrating mesh nebulizer closed system (SUN-101/eFlow®), has progressed to Phase III trials and is currently in late-stage development as an option for maintenance treatment in COPD. The present critical review describes the current knowledge about the novel nebulizer technology, the efficacy, safety, and critical role of nebulized glycopyrrolate in patients with COPD. To this end, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, and Cochrane Library have been searched for relevant papers. According to the available results, the efficacy and tolerability profile of nebulized glycopyrrolate may represent a valuable and dynamic treatment option for the chronic pharmacological management of patients with COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierachille Santus
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), University of Milan, Division of Respiratory Diseases, “L. Sacco” Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Dejan Radovanovic
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), University of Milan, Division of Respiratory Diseases, “L. Sacco” Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Cristiano
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), University of Milan, Division of Respiratory Diseases, “L. Sacco” Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valenti
- Department of Health Bioscience, University of Milan – Respiratory Unit, Policlinico di San Donato, IRCCS – San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Rizzi
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), University of Milan, Division of Respiratory Diseases, “L. Sacco” Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Long-term safety of glycopyrrolate/eFlow® CS in moderate-to-very-severe COPD: Results from the Glycopyrrolate for Obstructive Lung Disease via Electronic Nebulizer (GOLDEN) 5 randomized study. Respir Med 2017; 132:251-260. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2017] [Revised: 06/30/2017] [Accepted: 08/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
13
|
Birring SS, Wijsenbeek MS, Agrawal S, van den Berg JWK, Stone H, Maher TM, Tutuncu A, Morice AH. A novel formulation of inhaled sodium cromoglicate (PA101) in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and chronic cough: a randomised, double-blind, proof-of-concept, phase 2 trial. THE LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2017; 5:806-815. [PMID: 28923239 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(17)30310-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2017] [Revised: 07/31/2017] [Accepted: 08/01/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cough can be a debilitating symptom of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and is difficult to treat. PA101 is a novel formulation of sodium cromoglicate delivered via a high-efficiency eFlow nebuliser that achieves significantly higher drug deposition in the lung compared with the existing formulations. We aimed to test the efficacy and safety of inhaled PA101 in patients with IPF and chronic cough and, to explore the antitussive mechanism of PA101, patients with chronic idiopathic cough (CIC) were also studied. METHODS This pilot, proof-of-concept study consisted of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with IPF and chronic cough and a parallel study of similar design in patients with CIC. Participants with IPF and chronic cough recruited from seven centres in the UK and the Netherlands were randomly assigned (1:1, using a computer-generated randomisation schedule) by site staff to receive PA101 (40 mg) or matching placebo three times a day via oral inhalation for 2 weeks, followed by a 2 week washout, and then crossed over to the other arm. Study participants, investigators, study staff, and the sponsor were masked to group assignment until all participants had completed the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in objective daytime cough frequency (from 24 h acoustic recording, Leicester Cough Monitor). The primary efficacy analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. Safety analysis included all those who took at least one dose of study drug. In the second cohort, participants with CIC were randomly assigned in a study across four centres with similar design and endpoints. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02412020) and the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT Number 2014-004025-40) and both cohorts are closed to new participants. FINDINGS Between Feb 13, 2015, and Feb 2, 2016, 24 participants with IPF were randomly assigned to treatment groups. 28 participants with CIC were enrolled during the same period and 27 received study treatment. In patients with IPF, PA101 reduced daytime cough frequency by 31·1% at day 14 compared with placebo; daytime cough frequency decreased from a mean 55 (SD 55) coughs per h at baseline to 39 (29) coughs per h at day 14 following treatment with PA101, versus 51 (37) coughs per h at baseline to 52 (40) cough per h following placebo treatment (ratio of least-squares [LS] means 0·67, 95% CI 0·48-0·94, p=0·0241). By contrast, no treatment benefit for PA101 was observed in the CIC cohort; mean reduction of daytime cough frequency at day 14 for PA101 adjusted for placebo was 6·2% (ratio of LS means 1·27, 0·78-2·06, p=0·31). PA101 was well tolerated in both cohorts. The incidence of adverse events was similar between PA101 and placebo treatments, most adverse events were mild in severity, and no severe adverse events or serious adverse events were reported. INTERPRETATION This study suggests that the mechanism of cough in IPF might be disease specific. Inhaled PA101 could be a treatment option for chronic cough in patients with IPF and warrants further investigation. FUNDING Patara Pharma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surinder S Birring
- Division of Asthma, Allergy & Lung Biology, School of Transplantation, Immunology, Infection & Inflammation Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK.
| | - Marlies S Wijsenbeek
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sanjay Agrawal
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Helen Stone
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke on Trent, UK
| | - Toby M Maher
- Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; Fibrosis Research Group, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK
| | | | - Alyn H Morice
- Hull York Medical School, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
The Effect of Nebulized Glycopyrrolate on Posterior Drooling in Patients with Brain Injury: Two Cases of Different Brain Lesions. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2017; 96:e155-e158. [PMID: 28081026 DOI: 10.1097/phm.0000000000000669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Posterior drooling, which can lead to substantial respiratory morbidity, including unexplained lung diseases and recurrent pneumonia, is an important issue in the rehabilitation unit. There are various treatment options for posterior drooling, including pharmacologic therapy, oral motor or behavioral therapy, biofeedback, local glandular injection of botulinum toxin, irradiation, and surgery. Among them, nebulized glycopyrrolate has the following advantages: It is noninvasive and is relatively free of central adverse effects because it does not cross the blood-brain barrier unlike other anticholinergics. Although there has been one case report regarding the effectiveness of nebulized glycopyrrolate for drooling in a motor neuron patient, there have not been any reports on its effectiveness for posterior drooling. Herein, we report two cases (an 82-year-old male bilateral hemiplegic stroke patient and a 1-year-old female cerebral palsy infant with bilaterally spastic hemiplegia of posterior drooling treated with nebulized glycopyrrolate) and identify salivary aspiration and the effect of nebulized glycopyrrolate using radionuclide salivagram. Considering its advantages and effectiveness, nebulized glycopyrrolate should be considered as one of the reliable methods to manage posterior drooling in patients with impaired cognition or swallowing difficulties, such as severe brain injury.
Collapse
|
15
|
Singh D, Scuri M, Collarini S, Vezzoli S, Mariotti F, Muraro A, Acerbi D. Bronchodilator efficacy of extrafine glycopyrronium bromide: the Glyco 2 study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2017; 12:2001-2014. [PMID: 28744115 PMCID: PMC5511020 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s137659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
An extrafine formulation of the long-acting muscarinic antagonist glycopyrronium bromide (GB) is in development for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), in combination with beclometasone dipropionate and formoterol fumarate - a "fixed triple". This two-part study was randomized, double blind, placebo controlled in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD: Part 1: single-dose escalation, GB 12.5, 25, 50, 100 or 200 μg versus placebo; Part 2: repeat-dose (7-day), four-period crossover, GB 12.5, 25 or 50 μg twice daily (BID) versus placebo, with an open-label extension in which all patients received tiotropium 18 μg once daily. On the morning of Day 8 in all five periods, patients also received formoterol 12 μg. In study Part 1, 27 patients were recruited. All GB doses significantly increased from baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) area under the curve (AUC0-12h) and peak FEV1, with a trend toward greater efficacy with higher GB dose. All adverse events were mild-moderate in severity, with a lower incidence with GB than placebo and no evidence of a dose-response relationship. In study Part 2, of 38 patients recruited, 34 completed the study. Adjusted mean differences from placebo in 12 h trough FEV1 on Day 7 (primary) were 115, 142 and 136 mL for GB 12.5, 25 and 50 μg BID, respectively (all P<0.001). GB 25 and 50 μg BID were superior (P<0.05) to GB 12.5 μg BID for pre-dose morning FEV1 on Day 8. For this endpoint, GB 25 and 50 μg BID were also superior to tiotropium. Compared with Day 7, addition of formoterol significantly increased Day 8 FEV1 peak and AUC0-12h with all GB doses and placebo (all P<0.001). All adverse events were mild-moderate in severity and there was no indication of a dose-related relationship. This study provides initial evidence on bronchodilation, safety and pharmacokinetics of extrafine GB BID. Overall, the results suggest that GB 25 μg BID is the optimal dose in patients with COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dave Singh
- Medicines Evaluation, University Of Manchester, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Mario Scuri
- Global Clinical Development, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy
| | - Sara Collarini
- Global Clinical Development, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy
| | - Stefano Vezzoli
- Global Clinical Development, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Annamaria Muraro
- Global Clinical Development, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy
| | - Daniela Acerbi
- Global Clinical Development, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Novel pharmacotherapies introduce additional options to providers and patients in how to best treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Emerging data question the role of inhaled corticosteroids in COPD treatment, particularly as combination dual bronchodilator pharmacotherapies demonstrate robust results. For those maximized on pharmacotherapy with continued dyspnea or exacerbations or both, emerging bronchoscopic procedures may offer additional therapy in select patients. This review focuses on data supporting the use of novel ultra bronchodilators, particularly in combination, and on the role for inhaled corticosteroid withdrawal and new bronchoscopic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon R Rosenberg
- Asthma and COPD Program, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, UK
| | - Ravi Kalhan
- Asthma and COPD Program, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wise RA, Acevedo RA, Anzueto AR, Hanania NA, Martinez FJ, Ohar JA, Tashkin DP. Guiding Principles for the Use of Nebulized Long-Acting Beta2-Agonists in Patients with COPD: An Expert Panel Consensus. CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASES-JOURNAL OF THE COPD FOUNDATION 2016; 4:7-20. [PMID: 28848907 DOI: 10.15326/jcopdf.4.1.2016.0141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Determining which patients with COPD may benefit from a nebulized long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) is a challenge in current practice. In the absence of strong clinical guidelines addressing this issue, an expert panel convened to develop guiding principles for the use of nebulized LABA therapy in patients with COPD. This article summarizes these guiding principles and other practical issues discussed during a roundtable meeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A Wise
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Antonio R Anzueto
- University of Texas Health Science Center, and South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Nicola A Hanania
- Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Jill A Ohar
- Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Donald P Tashkin
- David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Current guidelines recommend inhaled pharmacologic therapy as the preferred route of administration for treating COPD. Bronchodilators (β2-agonists and antimuscarinics) are the mainstay of pharmacologic therapy in patients with COPD, with long-acting agents recommended for patients with moderate to severe symptoms or those who are at a higher risk for COPD exacerbations. Dry powder inhalers and pressurized metered dose inhalers are the most commonly used drug delivery devices, but they may be inadequate in various clinical scenarios (eg, the elderly, the cognitively impaired, and hospitalized patients). As more drugs become available in solution formulations, patients with COPD and their caregivers are becoming increasingly satisfied with nebulized drug delivery, which provides benefits similar to drugs delivered by handheld inhalers in both symptom relief and improved quality of life. This article reviews recent innovations in nebulized drug delivery and the important role of nebulized therapy in the treatment of COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald P Tashkin
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
The bronchodilator effects of extrafine glycopyrronium added to combination treatment with beclometasone dipropionate plus formoterol in COPD: A randomised crossover study (the TRIDENT study). Respir Med 2016; 114:84-90. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2016] [Revised: 03/23/2016] [Accepted: 03/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
20
|
Singh D, Ravi A, Reid F, Buck H, O'Connor G, Down G. Bronchodilator effects, pharmacokinetics and safety of PSX1002-GB, a novel glycopyrronium bromide formulation, in COPD patients; a randomised crossover study. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2016; 37:9-14. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2016.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2015] [Revised: 01/21/2016] [Accepted: 01/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
21
|
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. Inhaled bronchodilators are the mainstay of COPD pharmacological treatment. Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) are a major class of inhaled bronchodilators. Some LAMA/device systems with different characteristics and dosing schedules are currently approved for maintenance therapy of COPD and a range of other products are being developed. They improve lung function and patient-reported outcomes and reduce acute bronchial exacerbations with good safety. LAMAs are used either alone or associated with long-acting β₂-agonists, eventually in fixed dose combinations. Long-acting β₂-agonist/LAMA combinations assure additional benefits over the individual components alone. The reader will obtain a view of the safety and efficacy of the different LAMA/device systems in COPD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea S Melani
- Dipartimento Vasi, Cuore e Torace, Fisiopatologia e Riabilitazione Respiratoria, Policlinico Le Scotte, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Viale Bracci Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Qian QZ, Cao XK, Qian QQ, Shen FH, Wang Q, Liu HY, Tong JW. Relationship of cumulative dust exposure dose and cumulative abnormal rate of pulmonary function in coal mixture workers. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2016; 32:44-9. [PMID: 26853175 DOI: 10.1016/j.kjms.2015.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2015] [Revised: 10/12/2015] [Accepted: 11/12/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
To investigate the dose-response relationship between cumulative dust exposure (CDE) and cumulative abnormal rate of pulmonary function in coal mixture workers. Three hundred and twenty eight coal mixture workers (exposed group) and 169 nondust-exposed workers (control group) were recruited. Basic information data were collected and pulmonary function tests were performed. Pulmonary function was compared between the two groups after comparing smoking behaviors. Pulmonary function indices [forced vital capacity in 1 second after full inspiration (FVC)%, forced expiratory volume (FEV)1%, and FEV1/FVC%] were compared among groups stratified by service length (exposure duration). The relationship between CDE dose and cumulative abnormal rate of pulmonary function in coal mixture workers was analyzed. Abnormal rate of pulmonary function in the exposed group (35.1%) was significantly higher than the control group (10.1%; p < 0.001); FVC%, FEV1%, and FEV1/FVC% in the exposed group decreased significantly compared with the control group (all p < 0.05). Differences in FVC%, FEV1%, and FEV1/FVC% among coal mixture workers stratified by exposure duration in the exposed group were statistically significant (all p < 0.05). The discernible increase in the cumulative abnormal rate was observed, from ≥ 1000 mg/m(3)·years group to ≥ 1700 mg/m(3)·years group. Correlation analysis revealed a positive correlation between the CDE dose and the cumulative abnormal rate of pulmonary function. Higher abnormal pulmonary function rate was found among coal mixture workers, characterized by decreased pulmonary function indices. Our results suggested a positive relationship between CDE dose and cumulative abnormal pulmonary function rate, and a rapid increase in cumulative abnormal rate within a certain range of CDE dose. A lower limit value of 1000 mg/m(3)·years has reference significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing-Zeng Qian
- College of Public Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiang-Ke Cao
- College of Life Science, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Qing-Qiang Qian
- Affiliated Hospital of North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Fu-Hai Shen
- College of Public Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, People's Republic of China.
| | - Qian Wang
- College of Public Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Hai-Yan Liu
- College of Public Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun-Wang Tong
- College of Public Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|