An open-label study in healthy men to evaluate the risk of seminal fluid transmission of denosumab to pregnant partners

Science-Based Approach to Harmonize Contraception Recommendations in Clinical Trials and Pharmaceutical Labels

This review presents a European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Association/PreClinical Development Expert Group (EFPIA-PDEG) topic group consensus on a data-driven approach to harmonized contraception recommendations for clinical trial protocols and product labeling. There is no international agreement in pharmaceutical clinical trial protocols or product labeling on when/if female and/or male contraception is warranted and for how long after the last dose. This absence of consensus has resulted in different recommendations among regions. For most pharmaceuticals, contraception recommendations are generally based exclusively on nonclinical data and/or mechanism. For clinical trials, contraception is the default position and is maintained for women throughout clinical development, whereas appropriate information can justify removing male contraception. Conversely, contraception is only recommended in product labeling when warranted. A base case rationale is proposed for whether or not female and/or male contraception is/are warranted, using available genotoxicity and developmental toxicity data. Contraception is generally warranted for both male and female subjects treated with mutagenic pharmaceuticals. We propose as a starting point that contraception is not typically warranted when the margin is 10-fold or greater between clinical exposure at the maximum recommended human dose and exposure at the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for purely aneugenic pharmaceuticals and for pharmaceuticals that induce fetal malformations or embryo-fetal lethality. Other factors are discussed, including contraception methods, pregnancy testing, drug clearance, options for managing the absence of a developmental toxicity NOAEL, drug-drug interactions, radiopharmaceuticals, and other drug modalities. Overall, we present a data-driven rationale that can serve as a basis for consistent contraception recommendations in clinical trials and in product labeling across regions.

Romiplostim use in pregnant women with immune thrombocytopenia

Treatment for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in pregnancy is hampered by the lack of fetal safety evidence of maternally-administered medications. The Pregnancy Surveillance Program (PSP) collected patient information from 2017-2020 for pregnancy, birth outcomes, and adverse events (AEs) for 186 women exposed to romiplostim from 20 days before pregnancy to the end of pregnancy. Timing of exposure was available in 128 women. Seventy-one mothers (38%) had prepregnancy exposure to romiplostim; intrapartum exposure was known for the first (for many mothers when they discovered their pregnancy), second, and third trimesters for 74 (40%), 22 (12%), and 44 (24%) mothers, respectively, with 15 mothers exposed during >1 trimester. Among the 86 mothers with known pregnancy outcomes, 46 (53%) had at least one pregnancy-related serious AE (SAE); approximately 2/3 of SAEs were due to underlying ITP. Of 92 mothers with known birth outcomes, 60 (65%) had a normal pregnancy and 16 (17%) had complications, with both categories including term and preterm births; there were 12 (14%) spontaneous miscarriages/stillbirths, 3 (3%) ectopic pregnancies, and 1 (1%) molar pregnancy. Most abnormal births resulted from abnormal pregnancies. There were five neonatal/postnatal AEs of note: inguinal hernia, cytomegalovirus infection, trisomy 8 (third trimester single-dose romiplostim exposure), single umbilical artery without known anomalies, and development of autism at age 2 years. Seven of 12 infants with neonatal thrombocytopenia had resolution of thrombocytopenia before discharge; all 12 were discharged. Review of pregnancies in women exposed to romiplostim did not reveal any specific safety concerns for mothers, fetuses, or infants.

Effect of a single-dose denosumab on semen quality in infertile men (the FITMI study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Infertility is a common problem globally and impaired semen quality is responsible for up to 40% of all cases. Almost all infertile couples are treated with either insemination or assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs) independent of the etiology of infertility because no medical treatment exists. Denosumab is an antibody that blocks RANKL signaling and inhibition of testicular RANKL signaling has been suggested to improve semen quality in a pilot study. This RCT aims to assess whether treatment with denosumab can improve spermatogenesis in infertile men selected by serum AMH as a positive predictive biomarker. This paper describes the design of the study.

Methods/design

FITMI is a sponsor-investigator-initiated, double-blinded, placebo-controlled 1:1, single-center, randomized clinical trial. Subjects will be randomized to receive either a single-dose denosumab 60 mg subcutaneous injection or placebo. The study will be carried out at the Department of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen. The primary outcome of the study is defined as the difference in sperm concentration (millions pr. mL) one spermatogenesis (80 days) after inclusion.

Discussion

We describe a protocol for a planned RCT aimed at evaluating whether treatment with denosumab can improve the semen quality in infertile men selected by using serum AMH as a positive predictive biomarker. The results will provide evidence crucial for future treatment in a patient group where there is a huge unmet need.

Trial registration

Clinical Trials.gov NCT05212337. Registered on 14 January 2022.

EudraCT 2021–003,451-42. Registered on 23 June 2021.

Ethical committee H-21040145. Registered on 23 December 2021.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06478-4.

RANKL regulates male reproductive function

Infertile men have few treatment options. Here, we demonstrate that the transmembrane receptor activator of NF-kB ligand (RANKL) signaling system is active in mouse and human testis. RANKL is highly expressed in Sertoli cells and signals through RANK, expressed in most germ cells, whereas the RANKL-inhibitor osteoprotegerin (OPG) is expressed in germ and peritubular cells. OPG treatment increases wild-type mouse sperm counts, and mice with global or Sertoli-specific genetic suppression of Rankl have increased male fertility and sperm counts. Moreover, RANKL levels in seminal fluid are high and distinguishes normal from infertile men with higher specificity than total sperm count. In infertile men, one dose of Denosumab decreases RANKL seminal fluid concentration and increases serum Inhibin-B and anti-Müllerian-hormone levels, but semen quality only in a subgroup. This translational study suggests that RANKL is a regulator of male reproductive function, however, predictive biomarkers for treatment-outcome requires further investigation in placebo-controlled studies.

Clinical trial considerations on male contraception and collection of pregnancy information from female partner: update

BACKGROUND

This is an update to our 2012 publication on clinical trial considerations on male contraception and collection of pregnancy information from female partner, after critical review of recent (draft) guidances released by the International Council for Harmonisation [ICH] the Clinical Trial Facilitation Group [CTFG] and the US Food & Drug Administration [FDA].

METHODS

Relevant aspects of the new guidance documents are discussed in the context of male contraception and pregnancy reporting from female partner in clinical trials and the approach is updated accordingly.

RESULTS

Genotoxicity The concept of a threshold is introduced using acceptable daily intake/permissible daily exposure to define genotoxicity requirements, hence highly effective contraception in order to avoid conception. The duration for highly effective contraception has been extended from 74 to 90 days from the end of relevant systemic exposure. Teratogenicity Pharmacokinetic considerations to estimate safety margins have been contextualized with regard to over- and underestimation of the risk of teratogenicity transmitted by a vaginal dose. The duration of male contraception after the last dose takes into account the end of relevant systemic exposure if measured, or a default period of five half-lives after last dose for small molecules and two half-lives for immunoglobulins (mAbs). Measures to prevent exposure of the conceptus via a vaginal dose apply to reproductively competent or vasectomized men, unless measurements fail to detect the compound in seminal fluid.

CONCLUSION

Critical review of new guidance documents provides a comparison across approaches and resulted in an update of our previous publication. Separate algorithms for small molecules and monoclonal antibodies are proposed to guide the recommendations for contraception for male trial participants and pregnancy reporting from female partners. No male contraception is required if the dose is below a defined threshold for genotoxic concern applicable to small molecules. For men treated with teratogenic mAbs, condom use to prevent exposure of a potentially pregnant partner is unlikely to be recommended because of the minimal female exposure anticipated following a vaginal dose. The proposed safety margins for teratogenicity may evolve with further knowledge.

An open-label study in healthy men to evaluate the risk of seminal fluid transmission of denosumab to pregnant partners

AIMS

Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal immunoglobulin G2 antibody that inhibits bone resorption and increases bone mass and strength. The present clinical study assessed serum and seminal fluid pharmacokinetics following a single denosumab dose in healthy men, and evaluated whether denosumab in seminal fluid poses any risk to a fetus in the event of unprotected sexual intercourse with a pregnant partner.

METHODS

An open-label, single-dose study in 12 healthy men was conducted over a 106-day period. Subjects received a single subcutaneous dose of 60-mg denosumab on day 1. Serum and seminal fluid samples were collected at specified time points to assess denosumab pharmacokinetics. Adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

Denosumab was measurable at low concentrations in seminal fluid (~2% of serum concentrations). The mean [standard deviation (SD)] maximum observed drug concentration (Cmax ) was 6170 (2070) ng ml(-1) (serum) and 100 (81.9) ng ml(-1) (seminal fluid). The median time to Cmax (tmax ) was 8 days (serum) and 21 days (seminal fluid). The mean (SD) area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast ) was 333 000 (122 000) day•ng ml(-1) (serum) and 5220 (4880) day•ng ml(-1) (seminal fluid). The mean (SD) Cmax and AUC ratios between seminal fluid and serum were 0.0217 (0.0154) and 0.0170 (0.0148), respectively. Using conservative assumptions for ejaculate volume (6 ml), vaginal absorption (100%) and placental transfer (100%), the measured mean denosumab seminal fluid Cmax would result in fetal exposure that was more than 110 times below the preclinically derived 'no effect level' for denosumab.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate a negligible risk to a fetus exposed to denosumab via seminal fluid transfer to a pregnant partner.