Statins and polyneuropathy revisited: case-control study in Denmark, 1999-2013

Risk factors for taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with breast cancer

PURPOSE

This study investigated the clinical risk factors for peripheral neuropathy induced by docetaxel and albumin-bound paclitaxel (AP) in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

This prospective observational study recruited 268 patients between March 2019 and December 2020. Patient information was obtained through the query system for laboratory test results, patient consultations, and scale evaluations. Neuropathic symptoms were followed up throughout and until 3 months after taxane chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to find the risk factors for overall and moderate-severe taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN).

RESULTS

Cumulative dose (odds ratio [OR] = 3.533, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.797-6.944, p < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (OR = 2.926, 95% CI: 1.621-5.281, p < 0.001), body surface area (BSA) (OR = 1.724, 95% CI: 1.011-2.941, p = 0.045), and hypocalcemia (OR = 4.899, 95% CI: 1.518-15.811, p = 0.008) all increased the risk of TIPN. Only cumulative dose (OR = 2.577, 95% CI: 1.161-5.719, p = 0.020) and BSA (OR = 2.040, 95% CI: 1.073-3.877, p = 0.030) were independent risk factors for moderate-severe TIPN.

CONCLUSION

Cumulative dose, BMI, BSA, and hypocalcemia are all risk factors for overall TIPN, whereas cumulative dose and BSA are risk factors for moderate-severe TIPN. Patients with breast cancer who have high BMI, large BSA, hypocalcemia, and large cumulative dose may be at risk of TIPN, and intervention measures must be actively carried out for them.

Diabetic Sensorimotor Polyneuropathy: An Overview on Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Diabetic distal symmetric sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN) is a common complication of diabetes with devastating consequences. Hyperglycaemia is the major aetiological factor, while emerging data demonstrate that cardiometabolic risk factors also contribute to its development. Diagnosis of DSPN involves interview of medical and neurological history, foot inspection, and sensory and motor function examination with specific tests such as temperature and pinprick perception for small nerve fibers, and vibration and light touch assessments for large nerve fibers. Management includes optimised glycaemic control, treatment of cardiovascular risk factors, and symptomatic treatment aiming at improving life quality. This article provides an overview on epidemiology, risk factors, classification, diagnosis and current treatment of DSPN.

Aggressive LDL-C Lowering and the Brain: Impact on Risk for Dementia and Hemorrhagic Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

The objective of this scientific statement is to evaluate contemporary evidence that either supports or refutes the conclusion that aggressive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering or lipid lowering exerts toxic effects on the brain, leading to cognitive impairment or dementia or hemorrhagic stroke. The writing group used literature reviews, references to published clinical and epidemiology studies, clinical and public health guidelines, authoritative statements, and expert opinion to summarize existing evidence and to identify gaps in current knowledge. Although some retrospective, case control, and prospective longitudinal studies suggest that statins and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering are associated with cognitive impairment or dementia, the preponderance of observational studies and data from randomized trials do not support this conclusion. The risk of a hemorrhagic stroke associated with statin therapy in patients without a history of cerebrovascular disease is nonsignificant, and achieving very low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol does not increase that risk. Data reflecting the risk of hemorrhagic stroke with lipid-lowering treatment among patients with a history of hemorrhagic stroke are not robust and require additional focused study.

Statins Neuromuscular Adverse Effects

Statins are drugs widely prescribed in high-risk patients for cerebrovascular or cardiovascular diseases and are, usually, safe and well tolerated. However, these drugs sometimes may cause neuromuscular side effects that represent about two-third of all adverse events. Muscle-related adverse events include cramps, myalgia, weakness, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy and, more rarely, rhabdomyolysis. Moreover, they may lead to peripheral neuropathy and induce or unmask a preexisting neuromuscular junction dysfunction. A clinical follow up of patients assuming statins could reveal early side effects that may cause neuromuscular damage and suggest how to better modulate their use. In fact, statin dechallenge or cessation, or the alternative use of other lipid-lowering agents, can avoid adverse events. This review summarizes the current knowledge on statin-associated neuromuscular adverse effects, diagnosis, and management. It is conceivable that the incidence of neuromuscular complications will increase because, nowadays, use of statins is even more diffused than in the past. On this purpose, it is expected that pharmacogenomic and environmental studies will help to timely predict neuromuscular complications due to statin exposure, leading to a more personalized therapeutic approach.

Lipids, Lipid-Lowering Therapy, and Neuropathy: A Narrative Review

Statins, or 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, are the mainstay of treatment for hypercholesterolemia as they effectively reduce LDL-C levels and risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Apart from hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia and HDL dysfunction are known risk factors for neuropathy in people with obesity and diabetes. Although there are case reports of statin-induced neuropathy, ad hoc analyses of clinical trials and observational studies have shown that statins may improve peripheral neuropathy. However, large randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses of cardiovascular outcome trials with statins and other lipid-lowering drugs have not reported on neuropathy outcomes. Because neuropathy was not a prespecified outcome in major cardiovascular trials, one cannot conclude whether statins or other lipid-lowering therapies increase or decrease the risk of neuropathy. The aim of this review was to assess if statins have beneficial or detrimental effects on neuropathy and whether there is a need for large well-powered interventional studies using objective neuropathy end points.

Impact of Atorvastatin on Skeletal Muscle Mitochondrial Activity, Locomotion and Axonal Excitability-Evidence from ApoE-/- Mice

The cardiovascular benefit of statins is well established. However, only 20% of high-risk patients remain adequately adherent after 5 years of treatment. Among reasons for discontinuation, statin associated-muscle pain symptoms are the most prevalent. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of high dose atorvastatin on skeletal muscle mitochondrial activity, aerobic and anaerobic exercise, and axonal excitability in a murine model of atherosclerosis. ApoE^-/- mice were fed 12 weeks a high-fat high-cholesterol diet alone or containing atorvastatin (40 mg/Kg/day). Outcomes were the evaluation of muscle mitochondrial functionality, locomotion, grip test, and axonal excitability (compound action potential recording analysis of Aα motor propioceptive, Aβ mechanoceptive and C nociceptive fibres). Atorvastatin led to a reduction in muscle mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial ATP production. It did not affect muscular strength but led to a time-dependent motor impairment. Atorvastatin altered the responsiveness of mechanoceptive and nociceptive fibres, respectively, the Aβ and C fibres. These findings point out to a mild sensitization on mechanical, tactile and pain sensitivity. In conclusion, although the prevalence of muscular side effects from statins may be overestimated, understanding of the underlying mechanisms can help improve the therapeutic approach and reassure adherence in patients needing-to-be-treated.

Statins and the risk of polyneuropathy: A systematic review and two meta-analyses

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Previous studies have shown inconsistent data on the relationship between statin use and polyneuropathy (PN). The current systematic review and meta-analyses were conducted to comprehensively investigate the risk of incident PN among statin-users compared with non-users by identifying all available studies and summarizing their results.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted from MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to October 31, 2020. We included cohort and case-control studies that compared the risk of incident PN between statin-users and non-users. Point estimates and standard errors from eligible studies were pooled together using the generic inverse variance method.

RESULTS

Of 4968 retrieved articles, 6 studies in non-diabetic populations and 2 studies in diabetic populations fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Two meta-analyses were performed. The pooled analyses did not find a statistically significant association between the use of statins and risk of incident PN with the pooled odds ratio of 1.24 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.76; I² 74%) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.56-1.21; I² 80%) in non-diabetic and diabetic groups respectively.

DISCUSSION

No significant association between the use of statins and the risk of PN was observed in this systematic review and these two meta-analyses. However, there was a high degree of heterogeneity of the meta-analyses.

Lipids and peripheral neuropathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hyperlipidaemia is associated with the development of neuropathy. Indeed, a mechanistic link between altered lipid metabolism and peripheral nerve dysfunction has been demonstrated in a number of experimental and clinical studies. Furthermore, post hoc analyses of clinical trials of cholesterol and triglyceride-lowering pharmacotherapy have shown reduced rates of progression of diabetic neuropathy. Given, there are currently no FDA approved disease-modifying therapies for diabetic neuropathy, modulation of lipids may represent a key therapeutic target for the treatment of diabetic nerve damage. This review summarizes the current evidence base on the role of hyperlipidaemia and lipid lowering therapy on the development and progression of peripheral neuropathy.

RECENT FINDINGS

A body of literature supports a detrimental effect of dyslipidaemia on nerve fibres resulting in somatic and autonomic neuropathy. The case for an important modulating role of hypertriglyceridemia is stronger than for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in relation to peripheral neuropathy. This is reflected in the outcomes of clinical trials with the different therapeutic agents targeting hyperlipidaemia reporting beneficial or neutral effects with statins and fibrates. The potential concern with the association between proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor therapy and cognitive decline raised the possibility that extreme LDL-C lowering may result in neurodegeneration. However, studies in murine models and data from small observational studies indicate an association between increased circulating PCSK9 levels and small nerve fibre damage with a protective effect of PCSK9i therapy against small fibre neuropathy. Additionally, weight loss with bariatric surgery leads to an improvement in peripheral neuropathy and regeneration of small nerve fibres measured with corneal confocal microscopy in people with obesity with or without type 2 diabetes. These improvements correlate inversely with changes in triglyceride levels.

SUMMARY

Hyperlipidaemia, particularly hypertriglyceridemia, is associated with the development and progression of neuropathy. Lipid modifying agents may represent a potential therapeutic option for peripheral neuropathy. Post hoc analyses indicate that lipid-lowering therapies may halt the progression of neuropathy or even lead to regeneration of nerve fibres. Well designed randomized controlled trials are needed to establish if intensive targeted lipid lowering therapy as a part of holistic metabolic control leads to nerve fibre regeneration and improvement in neuropathy symptoms.

Drug-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Narrative Review

Background

Peripheral neuropathy is a painful condition deriving from many and varied etiologies. Certain medications have been implicated in the iatrogenic development of Drug Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (DIPN) and include chemotherapeutic agents, antimicrobials, cardiovascular drugs, psychotropic, anticonvulsants, among others. This review synthesizes current clinical concepts regarding the mechanism, common inciting medications, and treatment options for drug-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Methods

The authors undertook a structured search of bibliographic databases for peer-reviewed research literature using a focused review question and inclusion/exclusion criteria. The most relevant and up to date research was included.

Results

Drug-induced peripheral neuropathy is a common and painful condition caused by many different and frequently prescribed medications. Most often, DIPN is seen in chemotherapeutic agents, antimicrobials, cardiovascular drugs, psychotropic, and anticonvulsant drugs. Certain drugs exhibit more consistent neuropathic side effects, such as the chemotherapeutic compounds, but others are more commonly prescribed by a larger proportion of providers, such as the statins. DIPN is more likely to occur in patients with concomitant risk factors such as preexisting neuropathy, diabetes, and associated genetically predisposing diseases. DIPN is often difficult to treat, however medications including duloxetine, and gabapentin are shown to reduce neuropathic pain. Advanced techniques of neuromodulation offer promise though further randomized and controlled studies are needed to confirm efficacy.

Conclusion

Awareness of the drugs covered in this review and their potential for adverse neuropathic effect is important for providers caring for patients who report new onset symptoms of pain, paresthesia, or weakness. Prevention of DIPN is especially important because treatment often proves challenging. While many pharmacologic therapies have demonstrated analgesic potential in the pain caused by DIPN, many patients remain refractive to treatment. More studies are needed to elucidate the effectiveness of interventional, neuromodulating therapies.

Chronic axonal idiopathic polyneuropathy: is it really benign

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP), a common neurological condition, is considered to be a benign neurological condition with a small risk of disability. However, many studies have shown a reduced quality of life and a nonnegligible affection of daily activities in patients with CIAP. Here we summarize recent data about CIAP.

RECENT FINDINGS

We discuss some of the latest articles regarding risk factors, comorbidities, and possible pathogenic factors regarding CIAP. Patients with chronic polyneuropathy have impaired walking capacity, disturbed balance, and an increased risk of falls. Idiopathic polyneuropathy has a negative impact on activities of daily living. Patients with CIAP may develop plantar ulcers and neuropathic arthropathy. Small fiber involvement may occur, and two recent studies indicate that neuropathic pain is present in about two thirds of the CIAP group. Furthermore, patients with CIAP with neuropathic pain have increased fatigue and poorer emotional well being.

SUMMARY

Despite the relatively mild motor impairment seen in most patients with CIAP, the condition causes limitations in life with decreased mobility, pain, and affection of basal daily activities. Because the pathogenesis of CIAP in unclear, there is no disease modifying treatment. Further studies regarding pathogenesis, and randomized controlled clinical trials regarding possible treatment options are needed.

Neurological complications of cardiovascular drugs

Cardiovascular drugs are used to treat arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia, arrhythmias, heart failure, and coronary artery disease. They also include antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs that are essential for prevention of cardiogenic embolism. Most neurologic complications of the cardiovascular drugs are minor or transient and are far outweighed by the anticipated benefits of treatment. Other neurologic complications are more serious and require early recognition and management. Overtreatment of arterial hypertension may cause lightheadedness or fatigue but often responds readily to dose adjustment or an alternative drug. Other drug complications may be more troublesome as in myalgia associated with statins or headache associated with vasodilators. The recognized bleeding risk of the antithrombotics requires careful calculation of risk/benefit ratios for individual patients. Many neurologic complications of cardiovascular drugs are well documented in clinical trials with known frequency and severity, but others are rare and recognized only in isolated case reports or small case series. This chapter draws on both sources to report the adverse effects on muscle, nerve, and brain associated with commonly used cardiovascular drugs.

Statin Therapy and Risk of Polyneuropathy in Type 2 Diabetes: A Danish Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Statins may reduce the risk of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) as a result of lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory effects, but statins have also been associated with neurotoxicity. We examined whether statin therapy affects the risk of DPN.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We identified all Danish patients with incident type 2 diabetes during 2002-2016. New users initiated statins between 180 days before and 180 days after their first diabetes record, while prevalent users had initiated statins before that period. Patients were followed for incident DPN using validated hospital diagnosis codes, starting 180 days after their first diabetes record. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to compute adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for DPN.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 59,255 (23%) new users, 75,528 (29%) prevalent users, and 124,842 (48%) nonusers; median follow-up time was 6.2 years (interquartile range 3.4-9.6). The incidence rate of DPN events per 1,000 person-years was similar in new users (4.0 [95% CI 3.8-4.2]), prevalent users (3.8 [3.6-3.9]), and nonusers (3.8 [3.7-4.0]). The aHR for DPN was 1.05 (0.98-1.11) in new users and 0.97 (0.91-1.04) in prevalent users compared with statin nonusers. New users had a slightly increased DPN risk during the first year (1.31 [1.12-1.53]), which vanished after >2 years of follow-up. Findings were similar in on-treatment and propensity score-matched analyses and with additional adjustment for pretreatment blood lipid levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Statin therapy is unlikely to increase or mitigate DPN risk in patients with type 2 diabetes, although a small acute risk of harm cannot be excluded.

Statins and Neuropathic Pain: A Narrative Review

The frequently prescribed drug class of statins have pleiotropic effects and have been implicated in neuropathic pain syndromes. This narrative review examines studies of statin-induced neuropathic pain which to date have been conducted only in animal models. However, the pathophysiology of diabetic neuropathy in humans may shed some light on the etiology of neuropathic pain. Statins have exhibited a paradoxical effect in that statins appear to reduce neuropathic pain in animals but have been associated with neuropathic pain in humans. While there are certain postulated mechanisms offering elucidation as to how statins might be associated with neuropathic pain, there is, as the American Heart Association stated, to date no definitive association between statins and neuropathic pain. Statins are important drugs that reduce cardiovascular risk factors and should be prescribed to appropriate patients with these risk factors but some of this population is also at elevated risk for neuropathic pain from other causes.

Statin use and peripheral nerve function-A prospective follow-up study

PURPOSE

To examine the association between use of statins and risk of deterioration of peripheral nerve function.

METHODS

We prospectively followed patients who initiated statin treatment and compared them with statin never-users (non-users). At the time of inclusion and at 1-year follow-up, participants underwent tests for peripheral nerve function (ie nerve conduction studies, quantitative sensory testing), skin biopsies and ratings of symptoms and signs of neuropathy. We selected five tests of nerve function and the intraepidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD) a priori as primary outcomes. We used linear regression to test for differences between statin users and non-users with Holm-Bonferroni-corrected statistical significance level of .05.

RESULTS

Comparisons were based on 57 statin users and 46 non-users. Changes in nerve function test results during follow-up were not uniform with regard to direction and were statistically not significant with the exception of IENFD (change in IENFD: statin users 1 fibre/mm vs. non-statin users -2 fibres/mm; P-value = .006). None of the participants developed overt peripheral neuropathy. However, five statin users developed neuropathy-like symptoms and a post hoc analysis showed a significant decrease in vibration sensitivity compared to asymptomatic statin users.

CONCLUSION

Statin use was not clearly associated with increased risk of deterioration of peripheral nerve function analysed at a group level. However, given the sample size limitations of our study and the findings of our post hoc analysis, we cannot preclude that peripheral nerve function may be affected in some individuals exposed to statins.

Risk factors for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients receiving taxane- and platinum-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a significant and difficult to manage side effect of neurotoxic chemotherapies. Several risk factors for CIPN have been identified to date, but inconsistencies and methodological limitations exist in past research. Also, a limited number of potential risk factors has been investigated in the past.

AIM

The objective of this study was to assess the relative contribution of a wider range of risk factors in the development of CIPN.

METHODS

This analysis used the 6-month data after starting chemotherapy from a larger prospective observational study on CIPN risk, prevalence, and quality of life. Patients were assessed at recruitment for possible CIPN risk factors, including prior history of neuropathies, current/past infectious diseases; neurotoxic medication history; personal and treatment characteristics; smoking history, alcohol use, and vegetable/fruit intake. Neuropathy was assessed at 6-months after starting chemotherapy with the neuropathy (motor/sensory) items of the NCI-CTCAE scale and the WHO criterion for neuropathy. Data on symptom burden were also collected.

RESULTS

Data were available from 255 patients from three cancer centers in Hong Kong, Singapore, and UK. The use of different scales did not always identify the same predictor variables. Key risk factors in multivariate regression models included older age (highest OR = 1.08, p < 0.01 with the WHO scale), chemotherapy (platinum-based chemotherapy had OR = 0.20-0.27 in developing CIPN compared to taxane-based chemotherapy), history of neuropathy (for motor CIPN only, OR = 8.36, p < 0.01), symptom burden (OR = 1.06, p < 0.05), number of chemotherapy cycles received (OR = 1.19-1.24, p < 0.01), and alcohol intake (OR = 0.32, p < 0.05). In univariate analysis, the use of statins was implicated with CIPN (p = 0.03-0.04 with different assessments) and diabetes showed a trend (p = 0.09) in the development of CIPN.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed the CIPN risk related to certain variables and identified new ones. This knowledge can assist with treatment decisions and patient education.

Statins and polyneuropathy revisited: case-control study in Denmark, 1999-2013

AIM

In a previous study, we found a positive association between statin use and polyneuropathy risk. Other studies reported equivocal results. The present study aimed to confirm our findings with a design similar to that used in our previous study but with a larger data set.

METHODS

We searched medical registry data to identify patients diagnosed with incident polyneuropathy of no known cause (idiopathic polyneuropathy) between 1999 and 2013; we verified diagnoses through medical records. For each case, we recruited 20 general population controls with no previous history of polyneuropathy. Controls were matched to their respective case for age and gender. We ascertained the prior statin use of cases and controls through a prescription registry. Based on this information, exposure to statins was categorized into 'ever use' or 'never use'. Ever use of statins was classified by how recently they had been used ('current use' or 'past use'); current use was further classified into long-term use (5+ years) and high- or low-intensity use. We used conditional logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to examine associations between polyneuropathy and statin use.

RESULTS

We included 370 validated cases and 7400 controls. Ever use of statins was not associated with an elevated risk of polyneuropathy (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.84, 1.54). Similarly, we found no associations between polyneuropathy risk and current use (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.79, 1.53), long-term use (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.66, 1.92) or high-intensity statin use (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.59, 1.84).

CONCLUSION

Statin use was not associated with an increased risk of idiopathic polyneuropathy.