The pharmacodynamic and clinical trial evidence for statin dose

Time-course atherogenic blood lipid response to statin discontinuation in dyslipidemic adults

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Half of dyslipidemic patients sometimes discontinue statin medication. It is unclear if blood atherogenic risk increases right after statin discontinuation or if there is a lingering protective effect. We sought to determine if a legacy effect prevented blood lipid increases during the first stages of statin cessation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Atherogenic blood lipid profile was measured in 10 overweight (BMI 31 ± 3 kg m-2) middle-aged males (62 ± 7 years old), statin users, while fasted and postprandially. Trials were conducted before (i.e., Day 0) and after 4, 7, 15, and 30 days of statin withdrawal and 20 days after statins reloading (Day 50). Four days after statin discontinuation, blood fasting LDL-c, total cholesterol (CHOL), and triglyceride (TG) concentrations increased by 30%, 18%, and 17%, respectively (P < 0.05). The increases in LDL-c, CHOL, and TG peaked after 7-15 days at 79%, 48%, and 34% of basal levels (P < 0.001), respectively. There were no significant correlations between the increases in blood lipids and the dose or years under statin treatment (P = 0.156-0.575). Twenty days after resuming statins, blood LDL-c (2.79 ± 1.06 vs 2.20 ± 0.50 mmol L-1; P = 0.568), CHOL (4.85 ± 1.41 vs 4.25 ± 0.83 mmol L-1; P = 0.747), and TG (1.47 ± 0.60 vs 1.50 ± 0.68 mmol L-1; P = 0.782), returned to basal levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data does not support a statin lingering/legacy effect in blood lipids since they dangerously increased after only 4 days of statin withdrawal in every patient, regardless of dose and years under treatment. Reloading statins restored blood lipids, evidencing a reproducible biological effect at the whole-body level.

Individualized Dose-Response to Statins Associated with Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes

Background

Statins reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and are efficacious in the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Dose-response to statins varies among patients and can be modeled using three distinct pharmacological properties: (1) E0 (baseline LDL-C), (2) ED50 (potency: median dose achieving 50% reduction in LDL-C); and (3) Emax (efficacy: maximum LDL-C reduction). However, individualized dose-response and its association with ASCVD events remains unknown.

Objective

We analyze the relationship between ED50 and Emax with real-world cardiovascular disease outcomes.

Method

We leveraged de-identified electronic health record data to identify individuals exposed to multiple doses of the three most commonly prescribed statins (atorvastatin, simvastatin, or rosuvastatin) within the context of their longitudinal healthcare. We derived ED50 and Emax to quantify the relationship with a composite outcome of ASCVD events and all-cause mortality.

Results

We estimated ED50 and Emax for 3,033 unique individuals (atorvastatin: 1,632, simvastatin: 1,089, and rosuvastatin: 312) using a nonlinear, mixed effects dose-response model. Time-to-event analyses revealed that ED50 and Emax are independently associated with the primary endpoint. Hazard ratios were 0.85 (p < 0.01), 0.83 (p < 0.01), and 0.87 (p = 0.10) for ED50 and 1.13 (p < 0.001), 1.06 (p < 0.001), and 1.15 (p = 0.009) for Emax in the atorvastatin, simvastatin, and rosuvastatin cohorts, respectively.

Conclusion

The class-wide association of ED50 and Emax with clinical outcomes indicates that these measures influence the risk for ASCVD events in patients on statins.

Bibliometric analysis of monoclonal antibodies for atherosclerosis

Atherosclerosis (AS) is a prevalent cardiovascular disease that greatly increases mortality in the aging population and imposes a heavy burden on global healthcare systems. The purpose of this study is to examine the research structure and current trends of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against AS from a bibliometric perspective, since the development of these drugs is currently booming. This study collected articles and reviews on mAbs against AS from the Web of Science Core Collection, spanning from 2003 to 2022. Biblioshiny was utilized to analyze and visualize the characteristics of countries, regions, authors, institutions, and journals included in this collection. We used VOS viewer to illustrate the frequency of country co-occurrence, and CiteSpace to visualize co-cited reference, keywords co-occurrence, keywords citation bursts, keywords clustering and timeline plots. The study included 1325 publications, with the United States emerging as a leading contributor to the field. ATHEROSCLEROSIS, CIRCULATION and ARTERIOSCLEROSISTHROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY are core journals that publish high-quality literature on the latest advances in the field. Noteworthy authors with numerous high-quality publications include Witztum JL and Tsimikas S. Currently, lipid metabolism and inflammation are the main research areas of interest in this field. The mAbs against AS is an evolving field, and ongoing research continues to advance our understanding. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge in this area, highlighting two primary research directions: inflammation and lipid metabolism. Additionally, the paper identifies emerging research hotspots, which will provide researchers with useful insights to guide future investigations and anticipate research directions.

Associations between statins and adverse events in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review with pairwise, network, and dose-response meta-analyses

OBJECTIVE

To assess the associations between statins and adverse events in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and to examine how the associations vary by type and dosage of statins.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Studies were identified from previous systematic reviews and searched in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, up to August 2020.

REVIEW METHODS

Randomised controlled trials in adults without a history of cardiovascular disease that compared statins with non-statin controls or compared different types or dosages of statins were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcomes were common adverse events: self-reported muscle symptoms, clinically confirmed muscle disorders, liver dysfunction, renal insufficiency, diabetes, and eye conditions. Secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction, stroke, and death from cardiovascular disease as measures of efficacy.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A pairwise meta-analysis was conducted to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for each outcome between statins and non-statin controls, and the absolute risk difference in the number of events per 10 000 patients treated for a year was estimated. A network meta-analysis was performed to compare the adverse effects of different types of statins. An E_max model based meta-analysis was used to examine the dose-response relationships of the adverse effects of each statin.

RESULTS

62 trials were included, with 120 456 participants followed up for an average of 3.9 years. Statins were associated with an increased risk of self-reported muscle symptoms (21 trials, odds ratio 1.06 (95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.13); absolute risk difference 15 (95% confidence interval 1 to 29)), liver dysfunction (21 trials, odds ratio 1.33 (1.12 to 1.58); absolute risk difference 8 (3 to 14)), renal insufficiency (eight trials, odds ratio 1.14 (1.01 to 1.28); absolute risk difference 12 (1 to 24)), and eye conditions (six trials, odds ratio 1.23 (1.04 to 1.47); absolute risk difference 14 (2 to 29)) but were not associated with clinically confirmed muscle disorders or diabetes. The increased risks did not outweigh the reduction in the risk of major cardiovascular events. Atorvastatin, lovastatin, and rosuvastatin were individually associated with some adverse events, but few significant differences were found between types of statins. An E_max dose-response relationship was identified for the effect of atorvastatin on liver dysfunction, but the dose-response relationships for the other statins and adverse effects were inconclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

For primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, the risk of adverse events attributable to statins was low and did not outweigh their efficacy in preventing cardiovascular disease, suggesting that the benefit-to-harm balance of statins is generally favourable. Evidence to support tailoring the type or dosage of statins to account for safety concerns before starting treatment was limited.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42020169955.

Effect of Upadacitinib on the Pharmacokinetics of Rosuvastatin or Atorvastatin in Healthy Subjects

This phase 1, 2‐part, 2‐period, open‐label, drug‐drug interaction study evaluated the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions between upadacitinib and rosuvastatin, an organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 and breast cancer resistance protein substrate, or atorvastatin, a cytochrome P450 3A, OATP1B1, and OATP1B3 substrate, in 36 healthy volunteers. During period 1, a single dose of rosuvastatin (5 mg; part 1) or atorvastatin (10 mg; part 2) was administered on day 1, followed by a washout period of 5 days. During period 2, once‐daily doses of upadacitinib extended‐release (30 mg) were administered on days 1 to 10, and a single dose of rosuvastatin (5 mg; part 1) or atorvastatin (10 mg; part 2) was administered 1 hour after the upadacitinib dose on day 7. Serial blood samples were collected for assays of drug concentrations. In Part 1, rosuvastatin maximum observed plasma concentration (C_max) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC_inf) were 23% and 33% lower, respectively, when administered with upadacitinib relative to when administered alone. In part 2, atorvastatin C_max and AUC_inf was 11% and 23% lower, respectively, when administered with upadacitinib relative to when administered alone. The C_max and AUC_inf of the active metabolite ortho‐hydroxyatorvastatin remained unchanged. Administration of a single 5‐mg dose of rosuvastatin or a single 10‐mg dose of atorvastatin had no relevant effect on upadacitinib C_max or area under the plasma concentration–time curve. These results demonstrated that upadacitinib has no clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin or on substrates transported by OATP1B or breast cancer resistance protein.

Why maximum tolerated dose?

A long-established approach to the pharmacological treatment of disease has been to start low and go slow. However, clinicians often prescribe up to maximum tolerated dose (MTD), especially when treating acute and more severe disease, without evidence to show that MTD is more likely to improve outcomes. Cardiovascular guidelines for some indications advocate MTD even in prevention, for example hypercholesterolaemia, without compelling evidence of better outcomes. This review explores the origins and potential problems of prescribing medications at MTD. Oral effective dose 50 (ED50) may be a useful guide for balancing efficacy and safety.

Efficacy and toxicity of antihypertensive pharmacotherapy relative to effective dose 50

Antihypertensive drugs have usually been approved at doses near the top of their respective dose-response curves. Efficacy plateaus but adverse drug reactions (ADRs), such as falls, cerebral or renal ischaemia, increase as dose is increased, especially in older patients with comorbidities. ADRs reduce adherence and may be difficult to ascertain reliably. Higher doses have generally not been shown to reduce total mortality, which provides a summary of efficacy and safety. Weight loss and other lifestyle measures are essential and may be sufficient treatment in many young and low risk patients. Most antihypertensive drug lower systolic blood pressure by around 10 mmHg, which reduces stroke and heart failure by about a quarter. Clinical trials have not been designed to demonstrate specific blood pressure treatment thresholds and targets, which are mostly extrapolated from epidemiology. Mean population oral effective dose 50 may be the most appropriate dose at which to commence antihypertensive drugs. The dose can then be titrated up if greater efficacy is demonstrated, or lowered if ADRs develop. Lower dose combination therapy may best balance benefit and harms with fewer ADRs and additive, potentially synergistic, efficacy.

Retrospective evaluation of statin prescription in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Statins are one of the most commonly prescribed medications in Australia. Although the cardioprotective effects of statins are well documented, questions remain regarding their risk-benefit profile in elderly adults, especially those with limited life expectancies.

AIM

To describe the prevalence and pattern of statin use in elderly patients admitted to a General Medicine Unit.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients aged ≥80 years who were admitted to the General Medical Unit at Monash Medical Centre between 1 January 2015 and 30 June 2015. Patients receiving statin therapy prior to admission were identified and included. Data including patient demographics, indication for statin, comorbidities, co-prescription of interacting medications, presence of muscle-related toxicity and any change to statin prescription were collected and described.

RESULTS

Of 852 patients admitted to hospital, 359 (42%) were taking statins prior to admission. Statins were used for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in 63% of patients and for primary prevention in 24%. Most patients were taking high- (16%) or medium-intensity statins (78%); 46% of patients were co-prescribed medications with the potential to increase the risk of statin toxicity. Statins were discontinued in 16% of patients; however, the majority of patients had no change to their statin prescription. Muscle-related toxicity was documented in 4% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Statin use and the co-prescription of potentially interacting medications are common in elderly adults admitted to hospital. Statin prescription in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities is rarely reviewed unless directly relevant to their admission diagnosis.

Effectiveness and prescription pattern of lipid-lowering therapy and its associated factors among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Malaysian primary care settings

Background

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the main complication leading to morbidity and mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). There is a large amount of evidence to support the use of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) for the prevention of CVD. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and prescription quality of LLT among T2DM patients and to identify its associated factors.

Methods

A multicenter cross-sectional study included 816 T2DM patients from four different primary care centers in Pahang, Malaysia. We involved LLT-eligible T2DM patients as per the national clinical practice guidelines (CPG). The assessment of therapy effectiveness focused on the attainment of target lipid measures stated in the CPG. Evaluation of the prescription quality was classified into appropriate, potentially inappropriate, and inappropriate, based on the compliance with guidelines and existence of potential safety concerns. Binomial logistic regression was employed to identify the predictors of LLT effectiveness and prescription quality.

Results

The overall percentage of T2DM patients receiving statin therapy was 87.6% (715/816). Statin therapy was appropriately prescribed in 71.5% of the cases. About 17.5% of the LLT prescriptions have at least one significant drug interaction with co-prescribed medications. The achievement of the primary target of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels was observed in only 37% of T2DM patients. The LLT indication and appropriateness of prescription were significantly associated with the attainment of LDL-C treatment goals. Primary prevention, Malay race, and hypertension were identified as predictors for appropriate prescribing of LLT among T2DM subjects.

Conclusion

There is a need to enhance the quality of LLT prescribing in the primary care setting to cover all eligible high-risk patients and ensure patient safety. Strategies to improve the achievement of LDL-C goals among patients with T2DM, such as investigating the potential role of the combination therapy and high-intensity statin therapy, are required.

Pharmacological cholesterol depletion disturbs ciliogenesis and ciliary function in developing zebrafish

Patients with an inherited inability to synthesize sufficient amounts of cholesterol develop congenital malformations of the skull, toes, kidney and heart. As development of these structures depends on functional cilia we investigated whether cholesterol regulates ciliogenesis through inhibition of hydroxymethylglutaryl-Coenzyme A reductase (HMG-CoA-R), the rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol synthesis. HMG-CoA-R is efficiently inhibited by statins, a standard medication for hyperlipidemia. When zebrafish embryos are treated with statins cilia dysfunction phenotypes including heart defects, left-right asymmetry defects and malformation of ciliated organs develop, which are ameliorated by cholesterol replenishment. HMG-CoA-R inhibition and other means of cholesterol reduction lowered ciliation frequency and cilia length in zebrafish as well as several mammalian cell types. Cholesterol depletion further triggers an inability for ciliary signalling. Because of a reduction of the transition zone component Pi(4,5)P2 we propose that cholesterol governs crucial steps of cilium extension. Taken together, we report that cholesterol abrogation provokes cilia defects.