Relationship between allograft cyclosporin concentrations and P-glycoprotein expression in the 1st month following renal transplantation

Role of cyclosporin A in the treatment of kidney disease and nephrotoxicity

The clinical use of cyclosporin A (CsA) has led to significant advances and achievements in the field of transplantation and immune diseases. However, the nephrotoxicity of CsA is a major concern in current immunosuppression regimens. CsA causes abnormal kidney function while treating kidney disease, causing problems for clinicians and patients. Evidence of CsA nephrotoxicity is almost always present in transplant recipients after long-term CsA administration (up to 10 years), and similar phenomena occur with other calcineurin inhibitors. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms and influencing factors of CsA for the treatment of primary nephrotic syndrome. The mechanisms of CsA nephrotoxicity, clinical-pathological features, diagnosis, prevention strategies, and risk factors are summarized. We discuss the correlates and mechanisms of the switch between kidney disease prevention and nephrotoxicity of CsA to better understand the function of CsA in the kidney and to provide a basis for the prevention and treatment of CsA nephrotoxicity.

Therapeutic concentrations of calcineurin inhibitors do not deregulate glutathione redox balance in human renal proximal tubule cells

The calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) cyclosporine A and tacrolimus comprise the basis of immunosuppressive regimes in all solid organ transplantation. However, long-term or high exposure to CNI leads to histological and functional renal damage (CNI-associated nephrotoxicity). In the kidney, proximal tubule cells are the only cells that metabolize CNI and these cells are believed to play a central role in the origin of the toxicity for this class of drugs, although the underlying mechanisms are not clear. Several studies have reported oxidative stress as an important mediator of CNI-associated nephrotoxicity in response to CNI exposure in different available proximal tubule cell models. However, former models often made use of supra-therapeutic levels of tissue drug exposure. In addition, they were not shown to express the relevant enzymes (e.g., CYP3A5) and transporters (e.g., P-glycoprotein) for the metabolism of CNI in human proximal tubule cells. Moreover, the used methods for detecting ROS were potentially prone to false positive results. In this study, we used a novel proximal tubule cell model established from human allograft biopsies that demonstrated functional expression of relevant enzymes and transporters for the disposition of CNI. We exposed these cells to CNI concentrations as found in tissue of stable solid organ transplant recipients with therapeutic blood concentrations. We measured the glutathione redox balance in this cell model by using organelle-targeted variants of roGFP2, a highly sensitive green fluorescent reporter protein that dynamically equilibrates with the glutathione redox couple through the action of endogenous glutaredoxins. Our findings provide evidence that CNI, at concentrations commonly found in allograft biopsies, do not alter the glutathione redox balance in mitochondria, peroxisomes, and the cytosol. However, at supra-therapeutic concentrations, cyclosporine A but not tacrolimus increases the ratio of oxidized/reduced glutathione in the mitochondria, suggestive of imbalances in the redox environment.

Tacrolimus dose, blood concentrations and acute nephrotoxicity, but not CYP3A5/ABCB1 genetics, are associated with allograft tacrolimus concentrations in renal transplant recipients

AIMS

Long-term use of the immunosuppressant tacrolimus is limited by nephrotoxicity. Following renal transplantation, the risk of nephrotoxicity may be determined more by allograft than by blood tacrolimus concentrations, and thus may be affected by donor CYP3A5 and ABCB1 genetics. Little is known regarding factors that determine tacrolimus intrarenal exposure.

METHODS

This study investigated the relationship between trough blood (C_0Blood ) and allograft (C_Graft ) tacrolimus concentrations and tacrolimus dose, haematocrit, genetics, acute nephrotoxicity, rejection status, delayed graft function, and time post-transplant. C_0Blood and C_Graft were quantified in 132 renal transplant recipients together with recipient and donor CYP3A5 (rs776746) and ABCB1 3435 (rs1045642) genotypes.

RESULTS

C_0Blood ranged from 2.6 to 52.3 ng/mL and C_Graft from 33 to 828 pg/mg tissue. Adjusting for dose, recipients who were CYP3A5 expressors had lower C_0Blood compared to nonexpressors, whilst delayed graft function was associated with higher C_0Blood . Linear regression showed that the significant predictors of C_Graft were C_0Blood (point-wise P = 7 × 10^-10 ), dose (P = .004) acute nephrotoxicity (P = .002) and an interaction between C_0Blood and acute tacrolimus nephrotoxicity (P = .0002), with an adjusted r²  = 0.35 and no contribution from donor or recipient CYP3A5 or ABCB1 genotype. The association between C_Graft and acute nephrotoxicity depended on one very high C_Graft (828 pg/mg tissue).

CONCLUSIONS

Recipient and donor CYP3A5 and ABCB1 3435C>T genotypes are not determinants of allograft tacrolimus exposure in kidney transplant recipients. However, tacrolimus dose and C_0Blood were significant predictors of C_Graft , and the relationship between C_0Blood and C_Graft appeared to differ in the presence or absence of acute nephrotoxicity.

ABCB1, ABCG2, ABCC1, ABCC2, and ABCC3 drug transporter polymorphisms and their impact on drug bioavailability: what is our current understanding?

INTRODUCTION

Interindividual differences in drug response are a frequent clinical challenge partly due to variation in pharmacokinetics. ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters are crucial determinants of drug disposition. They are subject of gene regulation and drug-interaction; however, it is still under debate to which extend genetic variants in these transporters contribute to interindividual variability of a wide range of drugs.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the current literature on the impact of genetic variants in ABCB1, ABCG2 as well as ABCC1, ABCC2, and ABCC3 on pharmacokinetics and drug response. The aim was to evaluate if results from recent studies would increase the evidence for potential clinically relevant pharmacogenetic effects.

EXPERT OPINION

Although enormous efforts have been made to investigate effects of ABC transporter genotypes on drug pharmacokinetics and response, the majority of studies showed only weak if any associations. Despite few unique results, studies mostly failed to confirm earlier findings or still remained inconsistent. The impact of genetic variants on drug bioavailability is only minor and other factors regulating the transporter expression and function seem to be more critical. In our opinion, the findings on the so far investigated genetic variants in ABC efflux transporters are not suitable as predictive biomarkers.

Relationship between allograft cyclosporin concentrations and P-glycoprotein expression in the 1st month following renal transplantation

The immunosuppressant cyclosporin is a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate whose impaired function has been associated with an increased risk of cyclosporin-induced nephrotoxicity following renal transplantation. This study investigated the relationship between blood and allograft cyclosporin concentration, and the effect of P-gp expression. Fifty biopsy samples were obtained from 39 renal transplant recipients who received cyclosporin as part of maintenance immunosuppression. Blood cyclosporin concentrations (2 hours postdose) were obtained from clinical records, matching allograft cyclosporin concentrations were measured in frozen biopsy tissue by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and allograft P-gp expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Blood and allograft cyclosporin concentrations in the 1st month post-transplantation ranged from 505-2005 μg/L and 0.01-16.7 ng/mg tissue, respectively. Dose was the only significant predictor of allograft cyclosporin concentrations (adjusted R²  = .24, F-statistic = 11.52, P = .0019), with no effect of P-gp expression or blood cyclosporin concentrations. P-gp expression is not the major determinant of allograft cyclosporin concentrations.