Therapeutic concentration achievement and allograft survival comparing usage of conventional tacrolimus doses and CYP3A5 genotype-guided doses in renal transplantation patients

Evaluating the evidence for genotype-informed Bayesian dosing of tacrolimus in children undergoing solid organ transplantation: A systematic literature review

Tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor, is a highly effective immunosuppressant used in solid organ transplantation (SOT). However, it is characterized by a narrow therapeutic range and high inter-patient variability in pharmacokinetics. Standard weight-based dosing followed by empiric dose titration is suboptimal in controlling drug concentrations, increasing risk of rejection or toxicity, particularly in the initial months post transplantation. This review explores the potential of combined pre-transplant genotyping and pharmacokinetic (PK) modelling to improve tacrolimus dosing in paediatric SOT recipients. A systematic search of Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases identified studies published between March 2013 and March 2023 that investigated genotype- and PK model-informed tacrolimus dosing in children post-SOT. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed study quality. Seven studies encompassing paediatric kidney, heart, liver and lung transplants reported using genotype and model-informed dosing. A combination of clinical and genetic factors significantly impacts tacrolimus clearance and thus initial dose recommendation. Body size, transplant organ and co-medications were consistently important, while either time post-transplant or haematocrit emerged in some studies. Several models were identified, however, with limitations evident in some and with absence of evidence for their effectiveness in optimizing initial and subsequent dosing. This review highlights the development of PK models in paediatric SOT that integrate genotype and clinical covariates to personalize early tacrolimus dosing. While promising, prospective studies are needed to validate and confirm their effectiveness in improving time to therapeutic concentrations and reducing under- or overexposure. This approach has the potential to optimize tacrolimus therapy in paediatric SOT, thereby improving outcomes.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of CYP3A5 genotype-guided tacrolimus dosing in solid organ transplantation using real-world data

The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of CYP3A5 genotype-guided tacrolimus dosing in kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplant recipients relative to standard of care (SOC) tacrolimus dosing, from a US healthcare payer perspective. We developed decision-tree models to compare economic and clinical outcomes between CYP3A5 genotype-guided and SOC tacrolimus therapy in the first six months post-transplant. We derived inputs for CYP3A5 phenotype frequencies and physician use of genotype test results to inform clinical care from literature; tacrolimus exposure [high vs low tacrolimus time in therapeutic range using the Rosendaal algorithm (TAC TTR-Rosendaal)] and outcomes (incidences of acute tacrolimus nephrotoxicity, acute cellular rejection, and death) from real-world data; and costs from the Medicare Fee Schedule and literature. We calculated cost per avoided event and performed sensitivity analyses to evaluate the robustness of the results to changes in inputs. Incremental costs per avoided event for CYP3A5 genotype-guided vs SOC tacrolimus dosing were $176,667 for kidney recipients, $364,000 for liver recipients, $12,982 for heart recipients, and $93,333 for lung recipients. The likelihood of CYP3A5 genotype-guided tacrolimus dosing leading to cost-savings was 19.8% in kidney, 32.3% in liver, 51.8% in heart, and 54.1% in lung transplant recipients. Physician use of genotype results to guide clinical care and the proportion of patients with a high TAC TTR-Rosendaal were key parameters driving the cost-effectiveness of CYP3A5 genotype-guided tacrolimus therapy. Relative to SOC, CYP3A5 genotype-guided tacrolimus dosing resulted in a slightly greater benefit at a higher cost. Further economic evaluations examining intermediary outcomes (e.g., dose modifications) are needed, particularly in populations with higher frequencies of CYP3A5 expressers.

A systematic review and meta-analysis recite the efficacy of Tacrolimus treatment in renal transplant patients in association with genetic variants of CYP3A5 gene

Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant with a narrow therapeutic index and pharmacokinetic variability. This variability may be attributed to genetic variants in gene CYP3A5 associated with Tacrolimus metabolism. Studies focusing on genetic variants in the CYP3A5 gene associated with Tacrolimus metabolism have been published, a meta-analysis of these published articles may provide a direction that can change the future research and clinical management of renal transplant patients. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we have reviewed and analyzed the studies and clinical trials conducted to determine the association between genetic variants of CYP3A5 and Tacrolimus metabolism from the PubMed database and clinical trials (www.clinicaltrials.gov). This meta-analysis also assessed the correlation of CYP3A5 genotype (rs776746) with concentration/dose (Co/D) of Tacrolimus in renal transplant patients. The 59 published articles on genetic association of the CYP3A5 on Tacrolimus doses were reviewed for this systematic review. Meta-analysis showed that the Tacrolimus Co/D ratio is significantly lower in the CYP3A5 expressor group as compared with non-expressor in Asian, European as well as in mixed populations at any post-transplant period (P<0.0001). Our study further confirmed that the CYP3A5 variant (rs776746) is clinically relevant for the dose determination of Tacrolimus. Variations in Tacrolimus Co/D have been found to be significantly linked to the patient's CYP3A5 genetic variant (rs776746). The addition of other genetic variants involved in the pharmacokinetic of Tacrolimus may determine efficient regimen for drug dose. Our meta-analysis confirmed that the CYP3A5 genetic variant (rs776746) analysis is relevant in personalizing the Tacrolimus dose determination in renal transplant patients.

Higher number of tacrolimus dose adjustments in kidney transplant recipients who are extensive and intermediate CYP3A5 metabolizers

Kidney transplant recipients carrying the CYP3A5*1 allele have lower tacrolimus troughs, and higher dose requirements compared to those with the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype. However, data on the effect of CYP3A5 alleles on post-transplant tacrolimus management are lacking. The effect of CYP3A5 metabolism phenotypes on the number of tacrolimus dose adjustments and troughs in the first 6 months post-transplant was evaluated in 78 recipients (64% Caucasians). Time to first therapeutic concentration, percentage of time in therapeutic range (TTR), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were also evaluated. Fifty-five kidney transplant recipients were CYP3A5 poor metabolizers (PM), 17 were intermediate metabolizers (IM), and 6 were extensive metabolizers (EM). Compared to PMs, EMs/IMs had significantly more dose adjustments (6.1 vs. 8.1, p = .015). Overall, 33.82% of trough measurements resulted in a dose change. There was no difference in the number of tacrolimus trough measurements between PMs and EM/IMs. The total daily tacrolimus dose requirements were higher in EMs and IMs compared to PMs (<.001). TTR was ∼50% in the PMs and EMs/IMs groups. CYP3A5 EM/IM metabolizers have more tacrolimus dose changes and higher dose requirements which increases clinical management complexity. Larger studies are needed to assess the cost and benefits of including genotyping data to improve clinical management.

CYP3A5 Polymorphism in Renal Transplantation: A Key to Personalized Immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus is essential for the maintenance of immunosuppression after a kidney transplant. CYP3A5 is the gene that metabolizes tacrolimus, and polymorphism in this gene affects the metabolizing status.

AIM

To assess the genetic polymorphism status of patients undergoing kidney transplantation and determine its impact on graft function and complications in the post-transplant period.

METHODS

We retrospectively included the patients who had undergone a kidney transplant and had positive genetic polymorphism of the CYP3A5 gene. Based on loss of alleles, patients were categorized as non-expresser (loss of both alleles), intermediate expresser (loss of one allele), and expresser (no loss of allele) denoted by CYP3A5*3/*3, CYP3A5*1/*3, and CYP3A5*1/*1, respectively. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Of 25 patients, 60%, 32%, and 8% were non-expressers, intermediate-expressers, and expressers, respectively. The mean tacrolimus trough concentration to dose ratio after 6 months of the transplant was higher in non-expressers than intermediate-expressers and expressers (213 vs 85 and 46 ng/mL/mg/kg/d, respectively). The graft function was normal in all 3 groups except for graft rejection 1 patient in the expresser group. Compared with expressers, urinary tract infections (42.9% and 62.5%) and new-onset diabetes after transplantation (28.6% and 12.5%) were more frequent in non-expresser and intermediate expressers, respectively. The proportion of patients developing new-onset diabetes after transplantation was lower with the pre-transplant diagnosis of CYP3A5 polymorphism (16.7% vs 23.1%).

CONCLUSION

Genotype-based dosing of tacrolimus helps achieve the desired therapeutic concentrations that can help to optimize graft outcomes and reduce the tacrolimus-related adverse effects. Pre-transplant evaluation of CYP3A5 can be more helpful in planning treatment strategies for optimized outcomes after kidney transplantation.

Tacrolimus Concentration Is Effectively Predicted Using Combined Clinical and Genetic Factors in the Perioperative Period of Kidney Transplantation and Associated with Acute Rejection

Background

Tacrolimus has unpredictable pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics, which are partially attributed to CYP3A5 polymorphism. The potential effects of clinical factors in the postoperative period of transplantation on tacrolimus PK and those of early tacrolimus PK variability on clinical outcomes are yet to be clarified.

Methods

We examined the genetic and clinical factors affecting early tacrolimus PK variability in 256 kidney transplant recipients. The relationships among tacrolimus exposure, graft function delay (DGF), and acute rejection (AR) were further explored. Findings. The CYP3A5 genotype were strongly associated with tacrolimus concentration/dose ratio (C₀/D). Additionally, ABCB1 (rs1045642 and rs2032582) and ABCC2 (rs3740066) were found to have potential independent effects on early tacrolimus C₀/D in multivariate analysis. Red blood counts and albumin level were the most significant clinical factors associated with tacrolimus C₀/D. Wuzhi capsule also exerted an effect on tacrolimus PK. A model combined with pharmacogenetic and clinical factors explained 43.4% tacrolimus PK variability compared with 16.3% on the basis of CYP3A5 genotype only. Notably, increasing tacrolimus concentrations in the early postoperative stage were associated with AR, but not DGF.

Conclusions

Combined analysis of genotype and specific clinical factors is important for the formulation of precise tacrolimus dose regimens in the early stage after kidney transplantation.

Use of Pharmacogenetics to Optimize Immunosuppressant Therapy in Kidney-Transplanted Patients

Immunosuppressant drugs (ISDs) are routinely used in clinical practice to maintain organ transplant survival. However, these drugs are characterized by a restricted therapeutic index, a high inter- and intra-individual pharmacokinetic variability, and a series of severe adverse effects. In particular, genetic factors have been estimated to play a role in this variability because of polymorphisms regarding genes encoding for enzymes and transporters involved in the ISDs pharmacokinetic. Several studies showed important correlations between genetic polymorphisms and ISDs blood levels in transplanted patients; therefore, this review aims to summarize the pharmacogenetics of approved ISDs. We used PubMed database to search papers on pharmacogenetics of ISDs in adults or pediatric patients of any gender and ethnicity receiving immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation. We utilized as search term: “cyclosporine or tacrolimus or mycophenolic acid or sirolimus or everolimus and polymorphism and transplant”. Our data showed that polymorphisms in CYP3A5, CYP3A4, ABCB1, and UGT1A9 genes could modify the pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressants, suggesting that patient genotyping could be a helpful strategy to select the ideal ISDs dose for each patient.

Efficacy and outcomes of CYP3A5 genotype-based tacrolimus dosing compared to conventional body weight-based dosing in living donor kidney transplant recipients

Introduction:

Clinical use of tacrolimus has been challenging due to its narrow therapeutic index and highly variable pharmacokinetics. In this study, we compared patients who received body weight-based tacrolimus dosing pre-transplant (transplanted from 2016 to 2018) with those who received CYP3A5 genotype-based dosing (2018 to 2020).

Methods:

Eighty-two renal transplant recipients were non-randomly assigned to genotype-adapted or bodyweight-based tacrolimus dosing groups. The primary end point was to study the proportion of subjects who achieved the target tacrolimus C₀ on post-op day 4. Secondary end points included clinical outcomes and safety.

Results:

The proportion of subjects who achieved the target tacrolimus C₀ on postoperative days 4 and 10 were significantly higher in the adapted group, 53.6% and 47.5%, compared to 24.3% and 17% in controls, respectively (P = 0.01). Adapted group subjects achieved their first target tacrolimus C₀ significantly earlier (4 days) compared to 25 days in controls (P = 0.01). The total number of tacrolimus dose modifications required in the first postop month were lower in the adapted group; 47 compared to 68 in the controls (P = 0.05). The proportion of subjects with sub-therapeutic tacrolimus exposure on postoperative day 4 was significantly higher in the controls, 56% versus 10% in the adapted group (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups in the rate of biopsy proven acute rejections, adverse events, and graft function at the end of 3 months follow up.

Conclusion:

Genotype-based tacrolimus dosing leads to more subjects achieving the target tacrolimus C₀ earlier. However, there may be a higher risk of tacrolimus nephrotoxicity.

Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus-Based Maintenance Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND Tacrolimus is an established component of immunosuppressive regimens for kidney transplant recipients (KTRs); however, data comparing long-term outcomes between formulations are lacking. We conducted a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis assessing tacrolimus (primarily Advagraf [once-daily] and Prograf [twice-daily])-based maintenance regimens. MATERIAL AND METHODS Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases and congress proceedings were searched to identify studies of adult de novo KTRs who received tacrolimus-based therapy in phase II/III randomized controlled trials. Outcomes were acute rejection, graft/patient survival, and incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to analyze treatment effects on graft/patient survival. RESULTS Sixty-eight publications (61 primary) were included. Of 21 publications reporting graft rejection following Advagraf or Prograf treatment in ≥1 study arm, 12-month biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) ranged from 3.3% with Prograf to 55.0% with mycophenolic acid (MPA)+corticosteroids (CS); >24 month BPAR ranged from 0% to 58.7% (the latter with bleselumab-based therapy). Fourteen publications reported graft loss following Advagraf (0-9.6%) or Prograf (0-7.5%). Patient mortality ≤24 months after transplantation (14 publications) ranged from 0% to 8.1% with Advagraf or Prograf. Advagraf+MPA+CS and reference treatment, Prograf+MPA+CS, were associated with a similar risk of graft loss (odds ratio 1.19; 95% credible-interval 0.51, 3.06) and mortality (odds ratio 1.21; 95% credible-interval 0.1557, 9.03). Incidence of NODAT and CMV varied by treatment arm. CONCLUSIONS Graft loss and patient mortality rates were generally comparable between Advagraf- and Prograf-based regimens. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate longer-term outcomes.

Genetic Polymorphisms Affecting Tacrolimus Metabolism and the Relationship to Post-Transplant Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Background

Tacrolimus is a key drug in kidney transplantation with a narrow therapeutic index. However, whether tacrolimus exposure variability affects clinical outcomes and adverse reactions remains unknown.

Objective

Our study investigated the factors that influence tacrolimus exposure in kidney transplantation recipients and the relationship between tacrolimus concentration and clinical outcomes and adverse reactions.

Settings and Methods

We examined the effect of tacrolimus concentration on clinical outcomes and adverse reactions in 201 kidney transplantation recipients, and identified clinical and pharmacogenetic factors that explain tacrolimus exposure.

Results

The CYP3A5 genotype was clearly associated with dose-adjusted trough blood tacrolimus concentrations (C₀/D), whereas no significant difference was observed in patients with the CYP3A4*1B, CYP3A4*22, ABCB1, ABCC2, POR*28 or PXR alleles. Clinical factors such as red blood cell count, hemoglobin, and albumin were the most useful influence factors affecting tacrolimus C₀/D. Besides, Wuzhi capsule increased tacrolimus C₀/D in kidney transplantation recipients. Furthermore, higher tacrolimus concentrations were associated with higher diarrhea and post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) risk but not with acute rejection and chronic allograft kidney dysfunction.

Conclusion

Clinical factors, medication, and CYP-enzyme polymorphisms accounted for tacrolimus concentration variability in kidney transplantation recipients. Furthermore, higher tacrolimus concentrations were associated with higher diarrhea and PTDM risk.

Clinical Implications of Tacrolimus Time in Therapeutic Range and Intrapatient Variability in Urban Renal Transplant Recipients Undergoing Early Corticosteroid Withdrawal

Tacrolimus demonstrates wide intrapatient and interpatient variability requiring therapeutic drug monitoring. The utility of tacrolimus time in therapeutic range (TTR) after renal transplantation (RT) under an early corticosteroid withdrawal (ECSWD) protocol is unknown. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of tacrolimus TTR in an ECSWD RT population.

Materials

A retrospective analysis of adult RT recipients maintained on tacrolimus was conducted. Patients were excluded if they were on nonstandard protocol immunosuppression agents <12 months post-RT. Tacrolimus TTR was calculated using the Rosendaal method. Patients were divided into high (TTR-H) and low (TTR-L) TTR groups based on cohort median. The primary outcome was to compare the incidence of acute rejection 12 months post-RT. Secondary outcomes included comparing rejection subtypes, incidence of donor-specific antibody (DSA) and de novo DSA (dnDSA), risk factors for acute rejection and dnDSA development, and allograft function (serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate).

Results

A total of 193 patients were analyzed (TTR-H = 98 and TTR-L = 95). There was no difference in the incidence of acute rejection (TTR-H 20.4% versus TTR-L 20.0%; P = 0.944). Positive DSA posttransplant (odds ratio [OR], 3.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-9.26; P = 0.007) was associated with a higher acute rejection at 12 months posttransplant. Mycophenolate dose reduction (OR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.13-6.97; P = 0.025) and acute rejection (OR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.09-8.18; P = 0.032) were associated with dnDSA formation. No difference in serum creatinine or estimated glomerular filtration rate was observed (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Tacrolimus TTR was not significantly different with regards to acute rejection in an ECSWD population. Future studies are still needed to determine tacrolimus TTR thresholds post-RT and identify populations that may benefit from this intrapatient variability monitoring parameter.

Clinical Impact of the Adaptation of Initial Tacrolimus Dosing to the CYP3A5 Genotype After Kidney Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes between genotype-guided and conventional tacrolimus doses in kidney transplantation patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from the date of inception to 26 February 2020. References of the retrieved articles were also reviewed and any further relevant studies were included. The search terms included 'tacrolimus', 'cytochrome P-450 CYP3A', 'polymorphism, genetic', 'genomics', 'genome', 'genotype', 'genes', 'alleles', and 'pharmacogenetics'.

RESULTS

Our study showed that the genotype-guided group included an increased proportion of patients with tacrolimus concentrations in the therapeutic range at steady state (risk ratio [RR] 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-1.72, p = 0.001; high quality), with a trend for achieving therapeutic concentrations earlier compared with those in the conventional group. However, there was no statistical difference in the incidence of delayed graft function (RR 1.98, 95% CI 0.92-1.76, p = 0.12; moderate quality), incidence of acute rejection (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.64-1.55, p = 1.00; moderate quality), incidence of graft survival censored for death (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.98-1.06, p = 0.37; moderate quality), and incidence of adverse effects (AEs).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the genotype-guided group had a higher proportion of patients within the targeted concentration and less median time to achieve the therapeutic range, the clinical endpoints, including delayed graft function, acute rejection, graft survival censored for death, and AEs were similar in both groups. All in all, evidence suggested there was no utility in pharmacogenetics for tacrolimus based on the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A5 genotype. Studies with Chinese and African American populations are needed due to the frequency of genetic polymorphisms of CYP3A5. Furthermore, a dosing algorithm that includes demographic and clinical factors plus multiple genetic variants should be added for consideration, and may optimize early tacrolimus exposure.

Initial Dosage Optimization of Tacrolimus in Pediatric Patients With Thalassemia Major Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Based on Population Pharmacokinetics

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an effective treatment for hematological disorders. Tacrolimus is widely used after HSCT, but it has highly interindividual variable pharmacokinetics. Population pharmacokinetics (PPK) researches of tacrolimus in children with β-thalassemia major (β-TM) undergoing HSCT are insufficient.

OBJECTIVE

To establish a PPK model of tacrolimus in children with β-TM and optimize initial dosing regimen for achieving target concentration of 5 to 15 ng/mL.

METHODS

Data on patients aged <18 years were retrospectively collected from January 2017 to December 2018. PPK analysis and Monte Carlo simulations were performed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling.

RESULTS

A data set of 55 patients with 332 concentrations was included. A 2-compartment model could best describe the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus. The body surface area and gender were significant covariates in the final model. The typical value of clearance, the distribution volume of the central room, the distribution volume of the peripheral room, and the intercompartmental clearance were 5.05L/h, 4.33L, 155L, and 6.22L/h, respectively. The optimal initial dosing regimen of 0.03, 0.04, 0.05, 0.06, and 0.10 mg/kg were appropriate for female children with a weight (WT) of 50 to 10 kg. The regimen of 0.04, 0.05, 0.06, 0.07, and 0.12 mg/kg is suitable for male children with a WT of 50 to 10 kg. The probability of target attainment (PTA) of each regimen reached 91%.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

A stable PPK model of tacrolimus was established. The proposed dosage regimen reached a good PTA, which could provide a reference for tacrolimus therapy.

National survey of physicians' perspectives on pharmacogenetic testing in solid organ transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Our objective was to evaluate physicians' perspectives on the clinical utility of pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing in kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplantation (KLHL-Tx).

METHODS

A 36-question web-based survey was developed and administered to medical and surgical directors of US KLHL-Tx centers.

RESULTS

There were 82 respondents (10% response rate). The majority were men (78%), non-Hispanic whites (70%), medical directors (72%), and kidney transplant physicians (35%). Although 78% of respondents reported having some PGx education, most reported lack of confidence in their PGx knowledge and ability to apply a PGx test. Participants reported mixed views about the clinical utility of PGx testing-most agreed with the efficacy of PGx testing, but not the benefits relative to the risks or standard of care. While 55% reported that testing was available at their institution, only 38% ordered a PGx test in the past year, most commonly thiopurine-S-methyltransferase. Physician-reported barriers to PGx implementation included uncertainty about the clinical value of PGx testing and patient financial burden.

CONCLUSION

Together, our findings suggest prospective PGx research and pilot implementation programs are needed to elucidate the clinical utility and value of PGx in KLHL-Tx. These initiatives should include educational efforts to inform the use of PGx testing.

Tacrolimus trough levels higher than 6 ng/mL might not be required after a year in stable kidney transplant recipients

Background

Little is known regarding optimal tacrolimus (TAC) trough levels after 1 year post-transplant in stable kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who have not experienced renal or cardiovascular outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effect of 1-year post-transplant TAC trough levels on long-term renal and cardiovascular outcomes and opportunistic infections in stable KTRs.

Methods

KTRs receiving TAC with mycophenolate-based immunosuppression who did not experience renal or cardiovascular outcomes within 1 year post-transplant were enrolled from a multicenter observational cohort study. Renal outcome was defined as a composite of biopsy-proven acute rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, and death-censored graft loss. Cardiovascular outcome was defined as a composite of de novo cardiomegaly, left ventricular hypertrophy, and cardiovascular events. Opportunistic infections were defined as the occurrence of BK virus or cytomegalovirus infections.

Results

A total of 603 eligible KTRs were divided into the low-level TAC (LL-TAC) and high-level TAC (HL-TAC) groups based on a median TAC level of 5.9 ng/mL (range 1.3–14.3) at 1 year post-transplant. The HL-TAC group had significantly higher TAC trough levels at 2, 3, 4, and 5 years compared with the levels of the LL-TAC group. During the mean follow-up of 63.7 ± 13.0 months, there were 121 renal outcomes and 224 cardiovascular outcomes. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, LL-TAC and HL-TAC were not independent risk factors for renal and cardiovascular outcomes, respectively. No significant differences in the development of opportunistic infections and de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies and renal allograft function were observed between the two groups.

Conclusions

TAC trough levels after 1 year post-transplant remained at a similar level until the fifth year after kidney transplantation and were not directly associated with long-term outcomes in stable Korean KTRs who did not experience renal or cardiovascular outcomes. Therefore, in Asian KTRs with a stable clinical course, TAC trough levels higher than approximately 6 ng/mL might not be required after a year of kidney transplantation.

Stakeholder perspectives of the clinical utility of pharmacogenomic testing in solid organ transplantation

Aims: To assess stakeholder perspectives regarding the clinical utility of pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing following kidney, liver, and heart transplantation. Methods: We conducted individual semi-structured interviews and focus groups with kidney, liver, and heart transplantation patients and providers. We analyzed the qualitative data to identify salient themes. Results: The study enrolled 36 patients and 24 providers. Patients lacked an understanding about PGx, but expressed interest in PGx testing. Providers expressed willingness to use PGx testing, but reported barriers to implementation, such as lack of knowledge, lack of evidence demonstrating clinical utility, and patient healthcare burden. Conclusion: Patient and provider educational efforts, including foundational knowledge, clinical evidence, and applications to patient care beyond just immunosuppression, may be useful to facilitate the use of PGx testing in transplant medicine.

Therapeutic concentration achievement and allograft survival comparing usage of conventional tacrolimus doses and CYP3A5 genotype-guided doses in renal transplantation patients

AIMS

Although cytochromeP450(CYP)3A5 gene polymorphism affects personalized tacrolimus doses, there is no consensus as to whether CYP3A5 genotypes should be determined to adjust the doses. The aims were to compare the therapeutic ranges and clinical outcomes between the conventional and genotype-guided tacrolimus doses.

METHODS

This randomized controlled study compared 63 cases of the conventional tacrolimus dose group (0.1 mg/kg/day) with 62 cases of the genotype-guided doses group of 0.125, 0.1 and 0.08 mg/kg for CYP3A5*1/*1, *1/*3, and *3/*3 genotypes for the initial 3 days of kidney transplantation. After day 3, dose adjustment occurred in both groups to achieve therapeutic concentrations.

RESULTS

The genotype-guided group had an increased proportion of patients with tacrolimus concentrations in the therapeutic range at the steady state on day 3 (40.3 vs 23.8%, P = .048). A lower proportion of over-therapeutic concentration patients was noted in the genotype-guided group in the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype (9.7 vs 27%, P = .013). Unexpectedly, more delayed graft functions (DGFs) were in the genotype-guided group (41.9 vs 22.2%, P = .018) especially in the CYP3A5*1/*1 participants who might have had an aggravated DGF by a longer ischaemic time and higher serum donor creatinine levels than in the control group. There were no significant differences of glomerular filtration rates or graft or patient survivals over a median 37-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Determination of the CYP3A5 genotype improved therapeutic range achievement. CYP3A5*1/*1 patients who have high risks of DGF should be closely monitored because of an increased risk of DGF and reduced glomerular filtration rate with high tacrolimus doses.