Redesigning the genetic architecture of phenotypically plastic traits in a changing environment

The Evolution of Gene Expression Plasticity During Adaptation to Salt in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

When environmental change is rapid or unpredictable, phenotypic plasticity can facilitate adaptation to new or stressful environments to promote population persistence long enough for adaptive evolution to occur. However, the underlying genetic mechanisms that contribute to plasticity and its role in adaptive evolution are generally unknown. Two main opposing hypotheses dominate-genetic compensation and genetic assimilation. Here, we predominantly find evidence for genetic compensation over assimilation in adapting the freshwater algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii to 36 g/L salt environments over 500 generations. More canalized genes in the high-salt (HS) lines displayed a pattern of genetic compensation (63%) fixing near or at the ancestral native expression level, rather than genetic assimilation of the salt-induced level, suggesting that compensation was more common during adaptation to salt. Network analysis revealed an enrichment of genes involved in energy production and salt-resistance processes in HS lines, while an increase in DNA repair mechanisms was seen in ancestral strains. In addition, whole-transcriptome similarity among ancestral and HS lines displayed the evolution of a similar plastic response to salt conditions in independently reared HS lines. We also found more cis-acting regions in the HS lines; however, the expression patterns of most genes did not mimic that of their inherited sequence. Thus, the expression changes induced via plasticity offer temporary relief, but downstream changes are required for a sustainable solution during the evolutionary process.

Developmental integration and evolution of labile plasticity in a complex quantitative character in a multiperiodic environment

Labile plasticity in a complex quantitative character is modeled, with multiple components contributing to net plasticity in the character. Each component has a specific development rate, norm of reaction, and cost of plasticity. For example, thermal adaptation in mammals includes seasonal fat deposition and fur growth, short-term shivering and sweating or panting, and movement between warm and cold sites. Norms of reaction do not reveal patterns of developmental integration, which must be investigated by studies of developmental dynamics in a changing environment. In a periodic environment, a labile character with a single component of plasticity is constrained by filtering environmental frequencies above the development rate and by the cost of plasticity. With multiple components of plasticity, some patterns of integration can alleviate these constraints to greatly improve fidelity of the mean phenotype tracking multiperiodic cycles in the optimum phenotype. This occurs by environmental signal amplification or inhibition through developmental integration among components and by an augmented development rate of net plasticity in the character that reduces environmental frequency filtering. When development of a component with high cost of plasticity is regulated partly by the norm of reaction of another component, evolution can diminish the reaction norm slope of the costly component without curtailing its development, thereby reducing the loss of fitness from its cost of plasticity. Apparent maladaptation in a component of plasticity may be an integral part of an adaptive pattern of developmental integration by mutual inhibition between components and compensatory evolution of a negative component reaction norm slope.

Remodeling Ancestral Phenotypic Plasticity in Local Adaptation: A New Framework to Explore the Role of Genetic Compensation in the Evolution of Homeostasis

Phenotypic plasticity is not universally adaptive. In certain cases, plasticity can result in phenotypic shifts that reduce fitness relative to the un-induced state. A common cause of such maladaptive plasticity is the co-option of ancestral developmental and physiological response systems to meet novel challenges. Because these systems evolved to meet specific challenges in an ancestral environment (e.g., localized and transient hypoxia), their co-option to meet a similar, but novel, stressor (e.g., reductions in ambient pO2 at high elevation) can lead to misdirected responses that reduce fitness. In such cases, natural selection should act to remodel phenotypic plasticity to suppress the expression of these maladaptive responses. Because these maladaptive responses reduce the fitness of colonizers in new environments, this remodeling of ancestral plasticity may be among the earliest steps in adaptive walks toward new local optima. Genetic compensation has been proposed as a general form of adaptive evolution that leads to the suppression of maladaptive plasticity to restore the ancestral trait value in the face of novel stimuli. Given their central role in the regulation of basic physiological functions, we argue that genetic compensation may often be achieved by modifications of homeostatic regulatory systems. We further suggest that genetic compensation to modify homeostatic systems can be achieved by two alternative strategies that differ in their mechanistic underpinnings; to our knowledge, these strategies have not been formally recognized by previous workers. We then consider how the mechanistic details of these alternative strategies may constrain their evolution. These considerations lead us to argue that genetic compensation is most likely to evolve by compensatory physiological changes that safeguard internal homeostatic conditions to prevent the expression of maladaptive portions of conserved reaction norms, rather than direct evolution of plasticity itself. Finally, we outline a simple experimental framework to test this hypothesis. Our goal is to stimulate research aimed at providing a deeper mechanistic understanding of whether and how phenotypic plasticity can be remodeled following environmental shifts that render ancestral responses maladaptive, an issue with increasing importance in our current era of rapid environmental change.

Evolutionary biology today and the call for an extended synthesis

Evolutionary theory has been extended almost continually since the evolutionary synthesis (ES), but except for the much greater importance afforded genetic drift, the principal tenets of the ES have been strongly supported. Adaptations are attributable to the sorting of genetic variation by natural selection, which remains the only known cause of increase in fitness. Mutations are not adaptively directed, but as principal authors of the ES recognized, the material (structural) bases of biochemistry and development affect the variety of phenotypic variations that arise by mutation and recombination. Against this historical background, I analyse major propositions in the movement for an 'extended evolutionary synthesis'. 'Niche construction' is a new label for a wide variety of well-known phenomena, many of which have been extensively studied, but (as with every topic in evolutionary biology) some aspects may have been understudied. There is no reason to consider it a neglected 'process' of evolution. The proposition that phenotypic plasticity may engender new adaptive phenotypes that are later genetically assimilated or accommodated is theoretically plausible; it may be most likely when the new phenotype is not truly novel, but is instead a slight extension of a reaction norm already shaped by natural selection in similar environments. However, evolution in new environments often compensates for maladaptive plastic phenotypic responses. The union of population genetic theory with mechanistic understanding of developmental processes enables more complete understanding by joining ultimate and proximate causation; but the latter does not replace or invalidate the former. Newly discovered molecular phenomena have been easily accommodated in the past by elaborating orthodox evolutionary theory, and it appears that the same holds today for phenomena such as epigenetic inheritance. In several of these areas, empirical evidence is needed to evaluate enthusiastic speculation. Evolutionary theory will continue to be extended, but there is no sign that it requires emendation.

Gene Expression Reaction Norms Unravel the Molecular and Cellular Processes Underpinning the Plastic Phenotypes of Alternanthera Philoxeroides in Contrasting Hydrological Conditions

Alternanthera philoxeroides is an amphibious invasive weed that can colonize both aquatic and terrestrial habitats. Individuals growing in different habitats exhibit extensive phenotypic variation but little genetic differentiation. Little is known about the molecular basis underlying environment-induced phenotypic changes. Variation in transcript abundance in A. philoxeroides was characterized throughout the time-courses of pond and upland treatments using RNA-Sequencing. Seven thousand eight hundred and five genes demonstrated variable expression in response to different treatments, forming 11 transcriptionally coordinated gene groups. Functional enrichment analysis of plastically expressed genes revealed pathway changes in hormone-mediated signaling, osmotic adjustment, cell wall remodeling, and programmed cell death, providing a mechanistic understanding of the biological processes underlying the phenotypic changes in A. philoxeroides. Both transcriptional modulation of environmentally sensitive loci and environmentally dependent control of regulatory loci influenced the plastic responses to the environment. Phenotypic responses and gene expression patterns to contrasting hydrological conditions were compared between A. philoxeroides and its alien congener Alternanthera pungens. The terricolous A. pungens displayed limited phenotypic plasticity to different treatments. It was postulated based on gene expression comparison that the interspecific variation in plasticity between A. philoxeroides and A. pungens was not due to environmentally-mediated changes in hormone levels but to variations in the type and relative abundance of different signal transducers and receptors expressed in the target tissue.