1
|
Neema S, Kothari R, Rout A, Mani S, Bhatt S, Sandhu S. Systemic treatment of psoriasis in special population. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2023; 0:1-8. [PMID: 37317756 DOI: 10.25259/ijdvl_7_2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Psoriasis is a common skin disorder affecting approximately 1% of the general population. The treatment of psoriasis depends on the body surface area involvement, quality of life impairment and associated co-morbidities. Special population comprising of pregnant women, lactating mothers, elderly individuals and children, is more vulnerable. They are not included in drug trials; rendering the data for use of systemic treatment scant and is mainly based on anecdotal evidence. In this narrative review, we discuss systemic treatment options in this special population. Though couples planning a family are not considered a special population, they form a subset that require special therapeutic consideration and have also been included in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rohit Kothari
- Department of Dermatology, Command Hospital Air Force, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | | | - Siddharth Mani
- Department of Dermatology, INHS Sanjivani Kochi, Kerala, India
| | - Siddharth Bhatt
- Department of Dermatology, INHS Asvini, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Al-Janabi A, Yiu ZZN. Biologics in Psoriasis: Updated Perspectives on Long-Term Safety and Risk Management. Psoriasis (Auckl) 2022; 12:1-14. [PMID: 35024352 PMCID: PMC8747772 DOI: 10.2147/ptt.s328575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Biologics targeting Th1/Th17 cytokines have revolutionised psoriasis treatment. In addition to treatment effectiveness, it is important to define and understand the long-term risks of biologic therapy in order to guide therapy selection and minimise these risks for patients where possible. This review article summarises available evidence from trial data, observational studies and pharmacovigilance registries to explore key long-term risks of biologic treatment, and how these risks might be managed in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Al-Janabi
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- The Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M6 8HD, UK
| | - Z Z N Yiu
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- The Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M6 8HD, UK
- Correspondence: ZZN Yiu Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal Hospital, Stott Lane, Manchester, M6 8HD, UK Email
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Medical therapies causing iatrogenic male infertility. Fertil Steril 2021; 116:618-624. [PMID: 34462096 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.07.1202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Primum non nocere. As physicians, our goal is to treat illnesses and alleviate suffering; however, in doing so, we can generate new problems in a game of medical whack-a-mole. For some patients, certain consequences or side effects are tolerable, while others may believe they have no alternative. For a male patient with infertility, a thorough history is imperative to elucidate whether the patient has been or is currently being exposed to medications that will harm libido, spermatogenesis, ejaculation, or the hypothalamic-pituitary-testosterone axis. This article will review the most common medications causing iatrogenic male infertility as well as options to minimize or even reverse their impact.
Collapse
|
4
|
Belinchón I, Velasco M, Ara-Martín M, Armesto Alonso S, Baniandrés Rodríguez O, Ferrándiz Pulido L, García-Bustinduy M, Martínez-López JA, Martínez Sánchez N, Pérez Ferriols A, Pérez Pascual E, Rivera Díaz R, Ruiz-Villaverde R, Taberner Ferrer R, Vicente Villa A, Carrascosa JM. Management of Psoriasis During Preconception, Pregnancy, Postpartum, and Breastfeeding: A Consensus Statement. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS 2021; 112:225-241. [PMID: 33065101 DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2020.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop evidence- and experience-based recommendations for the management of psoriasis during preconception, pregnancy, postpartum, and breastfeeding. METHODS The nominal group technique and the Delphi method were used. Fifteen experts (12 dermatologists, 2 of whom were appointed coordinators; 1 rheumatologist; and 2 gynecologists) were selected to form an expert panel. Following a systematic review of the literature on fertility, pregnancy, postpartum, and breastfeeding in women with psoriasis, the coordinators drew up a series of preliminary recommendations for discussion by the panel at a nominal group meeting. The experts defined the scope, sections, and intended users of the statement and prepared a final list of recommendations. Consensus was obtained using a Delphi process in which an additional 51 dermatologists rated their level of agreement with each recommendation on a scale of 1 (total disagreement) to 10 (total agreement). Consensus was defined by a score of 7 or higher assigned by at least 70% of participants. Level of evidence and strength of recommendation were reported using the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine categories. The final statement was approved by the expert panel. RESULTS The resulting consensus statement includes 23 recommendations on preconception (fertility and contraception), pregnancy (planning, pharmacological management, and follow-up), and breastfeeding (management and follow-up). Consensus was achieved for all recommendations generated except one. CONCLUSIONS These recommendations for the better management of psoriasis in women of childbearing age could improve outcomes and prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Belinchón
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante-ISABIAL-UMH, Alicante, España.
| | - M Velasco
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, España
| | - M Ara-Martín
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Clínico Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, España
| | - S Armesto Alonso
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, España
| | | | - L Ferrándiz Pulido
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, España
| | - M García-Bustinduy
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España
| | - J A Martínez-López
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, España
| | - N Martínez Sánchez
- Servicio de Ginecología-Obstetricia, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, España
| | - A Pérez Ferriols
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital General de Valencia, Valencia, España
| | - E Pérez Pascual
- Servicio de Ginecología-Obstetricia, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante-ISABIAL, Alicante, España
| | - R Rivera Díaz
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, España
| | - R Ruiz-Villaverde
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, España
| | - R Taberner Ferrer
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Son Llàtzer, Palma de Mallorca, España
| | - A Vicente Villa
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, España
| | - J M Carrascosa
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, España
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Belinchón I, Velasco M, Ara-Martín M, Armesto Alonso S, Baniandrés Rodríguez O, Ferrándiz Pulido L, García-Bustinduy M, Martínez-López J, Martínez Sánchez N, Pérez Ferriols A, Pérez Pascual E, Rivera Díaz R, Ruiz-Villaverde R, Taberner Ferrer R, Vicente Villa A, Carrascosa J. Management of Psoriasis During Preconception, Pregnancy, Postpartum, and Breastfeeding: A Consensus Statement. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.adengl.2020.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
6
|
Effect of Excessive Body Weight and Psoriasis in Women Undergoing ICSI Procedure and State of Health of the Newborn. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9113628. [PMID: 33187195 PMCID: PMC7696436 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9113628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Excessive body weight and some concomitant diseases, such as psoriasis, accompany women treated due to infertility by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). This study is aimed to assess effect of obesity and psoriasis on quality of egg cells, embryos, course of pregnancy, and state of a newborn after treatment with ICSI. A total of 140 women were included into the study (110 healthy women and 30 with psoriasis). Among healthy women, BMI negatively correlated with total recovery rate, total oocyte score, blastocyst formation rate (BFR) and amount and quality of blastocysts (r < 0, p < 0.001). The relationships were similar in psoriasis, however apart from average blastocyst quality (p = 0.17) and BFR (p = 0.352). In healthy patients, BMI negatively correlated with gestational age at delivery (r = −0.444, p = 0.010) and APGAR (r = −0.481, p = 0.005). An excess of adipose tissue exerts an unfavourable effect on female reproductive functions, especially with a simultaneous burden of psoriasis. Excessive body weight is conducive to development of gestational diabetes and shortens the duration of pregnancy. The burden of psoriasis in combination with excessive body weight has an impact on the risk of occurrence of intrauterine growth restriction of foetus. Overweight and obesity negatively affect the state of a newborn, measured using APGAR scale.
Collapse
|
7
|
Cacciapuoti S, Scala E, Megna M, Gallo L, Fontanella G, Ruggiero A, Savastano S, Fabbrocini G. Impact of current antipsoriatic systemic treatments on male and female fertility: what endocrinologists need to know. Minerva Endocrinol (Torino) 2020; 46:350-362. [PMID: 32720503 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6507.20.03236-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Fertility is a function of the body that is often overlooked as a site for the expression of the side effects of certain drugs. With the approval of new drugs with a totally innovative mechanism of action, the risk assessment on fertility both in male and female is more difficult. This is particularly true in psoriasis, an invalidating inflammatory skin disease. The estimated prevalence of psoriasis in adults ranged from 0.51% to 11.43%, and in children from 0% to 1.37%, with frequent diagnosis in young patients of childbearing age. With the increasing use of new, predominantly immunosuppressive or biologic drugs for psoriasis, questions frequently arise in clinical practice as to their safety in men and women wishing to procreate. Both psoriatic patients and their physicians are concerned about adverse effects of the disease and its treatment on their future fertility, causing additional concerns in the therapeutic management of these patients. Among antipsoriatic drugs, conventional therapies are mainly involved in the onset of infertility in both sexes, exerting in some cases toxic effects against reproductive organs. Conversely, biologic agents appear to improve male and female fertility especially when gonadal impairment is related to inflammatory phenomena. There is a lack of review articles of commonly used medications in psoriasis with respect to their potential effects on fertility. The aim of this paper was to provide a practical guide for both dermatologist and endocrinologist in therapeutic management of psoriatic patients of childbearing age, considering the impact of prescribed drugs on their current and future fertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Cacciapuoti
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy -
| | - Emanuele Scala
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Matteo Megna
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Lucia Gallo
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Fontanella
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Angelo Ruggiero
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Silvia Savastano
- Unit of Endocrinology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Gabriella Fabbrocini
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Asfour L, Yiu ZZN, Warren RB. How is safety of dermatology drugs assessed: trials, registries, and spontaneous reporting. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2020; 19:449-457. [PMID: 32228187 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2020.1746267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Skin conditions are common and highly varied in their etiology; therefore, a diverse array of therapeutics are utilized. Drug safety studies in dermatology can be challenging as there are over 3000 diagnoses to consider. As a result, dermatologists rely on data from multiple sources including clinical trials and real-world evidence.Areas covered: In this review, we cover the main sources of safety data available, their strengths and weaknesses and how dermatologists should utilize such data. We use real-world examples of the different types of adverse events reported and how they are best captured by either randomized controlled trials or post-marketing pharmacovigilance methods. With multiple new therapies in dermatology, such as dupilumab for atopic dermatitis and janus-kinase inhibitors for alopecia areata the specialty is awash with evolving high-level evidence for their use. It is important to understand the optimal way to assess safety from trials but also appreciate the need for ongoing capture of safety data in clinical practice.Expert opinion: In dermatology, there is a plethora of conditions to treat and clinical trials, post-marketing surveillance, such as drug registries and spontaneous reporting, all enable dermatologists to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the safety profiles of drugs being used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Asfour
- Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, the University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Zenas Z N Yiu
- Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, the University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard B Warren
- Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, the University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Campanati A, Diotallevi F, Martina E, Paolinelli M, Radi G, Offidani A. Safety update of etanercept treatment for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2020; 19:439-448. [PMID: 32178543 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2020.1740204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Conventional topical therapies and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for patients with psoriasis are often linked to inadequate outcomes and risk of multiple adverse effects. Biologic agents such as etanercept (ETN) have revolutionized the therapeutic management of psoriasis, allowing the treatment of most difficult cases, and fragile patients.Areas covered: The authors searched PubMed using the term 'psoriasis,' 'etanercept,' and 'safety.' Articles considered by the authors to be most relevant, such as randomized controlled studies, cohort studies, and review articles placing emphasis on studies of efficacy and safety were selected. Case reports and letters relating to safety were also included. The main sources of data referenced by these articles were also included in the review. Besides, to get the relevant studies, the reference lists were examined to identify the potentially available studies. The aim of this review is to describe the safety profile of ETN, used for psoriasis treatment, focusing on related clinical implications.Expert opinion: ETN has a favorable safety profile, and its use should be largely considered in psoriatic patients. Caution should be recommended in case of chronic heart failure, autoimmune disease, previous malignancies, familial history of demyelinating diseases, latent TBC infection, chronic HBV and HCV infection or HIV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Campanati
- Dermatological Clinic, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic Marche University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Federico Diotallevi
- Dermatological Clinic, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic Marche University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Emanuela Martina
- Dermatological Clinic, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic Marche University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Matteo Paolinelli
- Dermatological Clinic, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic Marche University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giulia Radi
- Dermatological Clinic, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic Marche University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Annamaria Offidani
- Dermatological Clinic, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic Marche University, Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kogan N, Raimondo N, Gusis SE, Izcovich A, Abarca Duran JA, Barahona-Torres L, Blanco O, Quintana GB, Briones MC, Castro C, Castro Vargas EG, Criniti J, Diez de Medina JC, Franco M, Gómez M, Levrero VP, Martínez López JE, Valenzuela F. Latin American Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Systemic Treatment of Psoriasis SOLAPSO - Sociedad Latinoamericana de Psoriasis (Latin American Psoriasis Society). Int J Dermatol 2019; 58 Suppl 1:4-28. [PMID: 31282026 DOI: 10.1111/ijd.14471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
This Clinical Practice Guideline on the systemic treatment of Psoriasis includes the recommendations elaborated by a panel of experts from the Latin American Psoriasis Society SOLAPSO, who assessed the quality of the available evidence using the GRADE system and the PICO process to guide the literature search. To answer each question, the experts discussed the results of randomized controlled trials, observational studies and metanalysis evaluating the interventions identified (non-biologics, biologics and phototherapy) in different populations of patients with moderate to severe plaque-psoriasis, which was summarized in Tables ad-hoc. The main end-points considered to assess efficacy were PASI 50, 75, 90 and 100, PGA 0-1 and significant improvement of health-related quality of life. Specific adverse events, either severe or leading to treatment interruption, were also evaluated. The 31 recommendations included in this CPG follow the structure proposed by GRADE: direction (for or against) and strength (strong or weak). The goal of this CPG is to improve the management of patients with psoriasis by recommending interventions of proved benefit and providing a reference standard for the treating physician. Adhering to the contents of this CPG does not guarantee therapeutic success. The final decision on the specific treatment is the responsibility of the physician based on the individual circumstances and considering the values, the preferences and the opinions of the patient or caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora Kogan
- Dermatology, Hospital Ramos Mejía, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Simon E Gusis
- Rheumatology, Hospital Ramos Mejía, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ariel Izcovich
- Program on Evidence Based Medicine, Hospital Aleman, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Orestes Blanco
- Parasitology, Institute of Tropical Medicine Pedro Kouri, La Habana, Cuba
| | | | - María C Briones
- Centro Privado de Piel "Dr. Enrique Uraga", Guayaquil, Ecuador
| | - Carla Castro
- Pediatric Dermatology, Hospital Universitario Austral, Pilar, Argentina
| | | | - Juan Criniti
- Program on Evidence Based Medicine, Hospital Aleman, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Minerva Gómez
- Dermatology, University Hospital, Monterrey, Nueva León, Mexico
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
van der Kraaij GE, Balak DMW, Busard CI, van Cranenburgh OD, Chung Y, Driessen RJB, de Groot M, de Jong EMGJ, Kemperman PMJH, de Kort WJA, Karsch SA, Lamberts A, Lecluse LLA, van Lümig PPM, Menting SP, Prens EP, van den Reek JMPA, Seyger MMB, Thio HB, Veldkamp WR, Wakkee M, Nast A, Jacobs A, Rosumeck S, Spuls Chair PI. Highlights of the updated Dutch evidence- and consensus-based guideline on psoriasis 2017. Br J Dermatol 2019; 180:31-42. [PMID: 30604536 PMCID: PMC6849803 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.17198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Linked Comment: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17390.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G E van der Kraaij
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Dutch Society of Dermatology and Venereology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - D M W Balak
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - C I Busard
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - O D van Cranenburgh
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Dutch Skin Foundation, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Y Chung
- Dutch Society of Dermatology and Venereology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - R J B Driessen
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - M de Groot
- Antonius Hospital, Sneek/Emmeloord, the Netherlands
| | - E M G J de Jong
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - P M J H Kemperman
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Waterlandziekenhuis, Purmerend, the Netherlands
| | | | - S A Karsch
- Dutch Society of Dermatology and Venereology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - A Lamberts
- Dutch Society of Dermatology and Venereology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - L L A Lecluse
- Bergman Clinics and U-clinic, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P P M van Lümig
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - S P Menting
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E P Prens
- Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - M M B Seyger
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - H B Thio
- Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W R Veldkamp
- Dutch Society of Dermatology and Venereology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - M Wakkee
- Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A Nast
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology und Allergy, Division of Evidence-Based Medicine (dEBM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - A Jacobs
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology und Allergy, Division of Evidence-Based Medicine (dEBM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Rosumeck
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology und Allergy, Division of Evidence-Based Medicine (dEBM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - P I Spuls Chair
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Plachouri KM, Georgiou S. Special aspects of biologics treatment in psoriasis: management in pregnancy, lactation, surgery, renal impairment, hepatitis and tuberculosis. J DERMATOL TREAT 2018; 30:668-673. [PMID: 30428753 DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2018.1544413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background of the article: Biologics are modern immunomodulatory drugs, whose use in the treatment of psoriasis has led to remarkable results in psoriatic patients. The administration of these agents in special population groups, such as patients with chronic infections and renal impairment, as well as perioperative, pregnant or lactating patients, has not been thoroughly addressed, mostly because these patients are excluded from clinical studies. Materials and methods: This report is an updated systematic overview of the use of biologics in the above-mentioned types of patients and was conducted according to the PRISMA Guidelines for systematic reviews. Articles derived from the databases PubMed, EMBASE and SCOPUS, published between 1999 and 2018, were analyzed for the study. Results: Research efforts as well as clinical reporting are necessary in order to provide more insight on the management of these therapeutic dilemmas. Conclusion: The aim of this review, other than providing a summarized update on the clinical knowledge on this special topic, is also to raise awareness for the need to conduct larger systematic studies in order to adequately evaluate the use of biologics in these special patient categories and therefore draw definite conclusions on their safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerasia-Maria Plachouri
- a Dermatology Department, University of Patras, University General Hospital of Patras , Patras , Greece
| | - Sophia Georgiou
- a Dermatology Department, University of Patras, University General Hospital of Patras , Patras , Greece
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Brown SM, Aljefri K, Waas R, Hampton P. Systemic medications used in treatment of common dermatological conditions: safety profile with respect to pregnancy, breast feeding and content in seminal fluid. J DERMATOL TREAT 2018; 30:2-18. [PMID: 28092212 DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2016.1202402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Prescribing for pregnant or lactating patients and male patients wishing to father children can be a difficult area for dermatologists. There is a lack of review articles of commonly used systemic medications in dermatology with respect to their effects on developing embryogenesis and their potential transfer across the placenta, in breast milk and in seminal fluid. This paper aims to provide an up to date summary of evidence to better equip dermatologists to inform patients about the effects of systemic medications commonly used in dermatology to treat conditions such as atopic dermatitis, psoriasis and acne, on current and future embryogenesis and fertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Khadija Aljefri
- a Dermatology Department , Royal Victoria Infirmary , Newcastle Upon Tyne , UK
| | - Rachel Waas
- a Dermatology Department , Royal Victoria Infirmary , Newcastle Upon Tyne , UK
| | - Philip Hampton
- a Dermatology Department , Royal Victoria Infirmary , Newcastle Upon Tyne , UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Volc S, Ghoreschi K. Pathophysiological basis of systemic treatments in psoriasis. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2018; 14:557-72. [PMID: 27240060 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.13050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Over the past 15 years, the spectrum of systemic antipsoriatic treatments has dramatically expanded. Until the end of the last millennium, systemic therapy had been restricted to four oral agents: methotrexate, cyclosporine, acitretin, and fumaric acid esters. Today, there are additionally seven biologics and one new oral antipsoriatic drug, as well as the first available biosimilars. Six more biologics with novel target structures and at least four biosimilars are currently being developed (phase III). This progress has been based on new insights into the pathogenesis of psoriasis, in which tumor necrosis factor and especially Th17 immune responses with their associated cytokines interleukin 23 and 17 play a key role. The development of new-generation biologics as well as immunomodulatory small molecules can be attributed to these pathophysiological findings. Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors, dimethyl fumarate, and Janus kinase inhibitors all interact with Th17 immune responses. Some of these drugs are in advanced clinical development and are also beneficial in psoriatic arthritis. Today, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis therefore rank among the most readily treatable inflammatory autoimmune disorders. Dermatology is increasingly becoming a specialty of modern targeted immunotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Volc
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karl University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Kamran Ghoreschi
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karl University, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Treatment Approaches to Moderate to Severe Psoriasis. Int J Mol Sci 2017; 18:ijms18112427. [PMID: 29144382 PMCID: PMC5713395 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18112427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2017] [Revised: 11/10/2017] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Psoriasis is a common disease, which has a considerable impact on patients and the health care system. Treatment approaches to the disease may be various because some issues are not definitely addressed. Moreover, the therapeutic paradigms are continuously changing because of the recent approval of new treatments for psoriasis such as interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors and apremilast. In this review, the factors influencing psoriasis severity, the indications for systemic treatments, the overall parameters to be considered in the treatment choice, life style interventions, and the recommendations for the use, screening, and monitoring of systemic therapies available including acitretin, cyclosporine, methotrexate, apremilast, adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, and ustekinumab are discussed. Finally, treatment approaches in special patient populations including children, the elderly, pregnant women, patients with a history of neoplasm, and candidates for surgical procedures are reported.
Collapse
|
16
|
Verstockt B, Deleenheer B, Van Assche G, Vermeire S, Ferrante M. A safety assessment of biological therapies targeting the IL-23/IL-17 axis in inflammatory bowel diseases. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2017; 16:809-821. [DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2017.1338273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bram Verstockt
- Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Barbara Deleenheer
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gert Van Assche
- Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Séverine Vermeire
- Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marc Ferrante
- Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rademaker M, Agnew K, Andrews M, Armour K, Baker C, Foley P, Frew J, Gebauer K, Gupta M, Kennedy D, Marshman G, Sullivan J. Psoriasis in those planning a family, pregnant or breast-feeding. The Australasian Psoriasis Collaboration. Australas J Dermatol 2017; 59:86-100. [PMID: 28543445 DOI: 10.1111/ajd.12641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2016] [Accepted: 01/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The Australasian Psoriasis Collaboration has reviewed the evidence for managing moderate to severe psoriasis in those who are pregnant or are breast-feeding, or planning a family. The severity of the psoriasis, associated comorbidities and specific anti-psoriasis treatment, along with other exposures, can have a deleterious effect on pregnancy outcomes. Psoriasis itself increases the risk of preterm and low birthweight babies, along with spontaneous and induced abortions, but no specific birth defects have been otherwise demonstrated. The baseline risk for a live born baby to have a major birth defect is 3%, and significant neuro-developmental problem is 5%. In Australia, pregnant women with psoriasis are more likely to be overweight or obese, depressed, or smoke in their first trimester, and are also less likely to take prenatal vitamins or supplements. Preconception counselling to improve maternal, pregnancy and baby health is therefore strongly encouraged. The topical and systemic therapies commonly used in psoriasis are each discussed separately, with regards to pregnancy exposure, breast-feeding and effects on male fertility and mutagenicity. The systemic therapies included are acitretin, adalimumab, apremilast, certolizumab, ciclosporin, etanercept, infliximab, ixekizumab, methotrexate, NBUVB, prednisone, PUVA, secukinumab and ustekinumab. The topical therapies include dithranol (anthralin), calcipotriol, coal tar, corticosteroids (weak, potent and super-potent), moisturisers, salicylic acid, tacrolimus, and tazarotene. As a general recommendation, effective drugs that have been widely used for years are preferable to newer alternatives with less foetal safety data. It is equally important to evaluate the risks of not treating, as severe untreated disease may negatively impact both mother and the foetus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marius Rademaker
- Department of Dermatology, Waikato Clinical Campus, Auckland Medical School, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Karen Agnew
- Department of Dermatology, Greenlane Clinical Centre, Auckland, New Zealand.,Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Megan Andrews
- The Skin and Cancer Foundation of Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Katherine Armour
- The Skin and Cancer Foundation of Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Chris Baker
- Department of Medicine (Dermatology), University of Melbourne, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,University of Melbourne, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Foley
- Department of Medicine (Dermatology), University of Melbourne, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,University of Melbourne, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - John Frew
- Department of Dermatology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kurt Gebauer
- Department of Dermatology, University of Western Australia, Freemantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Monisha Gupta
- Department of Dermatology, Liverpool Hospital, Skin Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Debra Kennedy
- Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gillian Marshman
- Flinders Medical Centre and Repatriation General Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - John Sullivan
- Holdsworth House Medical Practice, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gisondi P, Altomare G, Ayala F, Bardazzi F, Bianchi L, Chiricozzi A, Costanzo A, Conti A, Dapavo P, De Simone C, Foti C, Naldi L, Offidani A, Parodi A, Piaserico S, Prignano F, Rongioletti F, Stingeni L, Talamonti M, Girolomoni G. Italian guidelines on the systemic treatments of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2017; 31:774-790. [PMID: 28244153 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.14114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2016] [Accepted: 12/21/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Psoriasis is a common disease, which has a considerable impact on the healthcare system. Therefore, appropriate use of therapeutic resources is very important. Management of psoriasis in daily clinical practice is highly variable because many issues are still debated and not definitely addressed by the evidence-based medicine. Moreover, the different availability and reimbursability of drugs in each country justifies national guidelines. Expert consensus can provide helpful guidelines for optimizing patient care. A total of 20 dermatologists from different areas of Italy and with large experience in the treatment of psoriasis agreed to participate in the guidelines expert panel who aimed to reach consensus on the factors influencing psoriasis severity, the indications for systemic treatments, the parameters to be considered in the choice of treatment, and the factors to be considered in the choice of biological treatment. The recommendations for the use, screening and monitoring of systemic therapies were based on the 2015 S3 European Dermatology Forum/European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology psoriasis guidelines. Recommendations on the treatment of psoriasis in special patient populations were also agreed. The final document was discussed in a meeting moderated by a facilitator with participation of the entire group and adopting a nominal group technique to reach consensus. A statement was regarded as consented when agreement was achieved by at least 75% of the voting experts according to the Delphi procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Gisondi
- Department of Medicine, Section of Dermatology and Venereology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - G Altomare
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| | - F Ayala
- Department of Dermatology, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - F Bardazzi
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - L Bianchi
- Department of Dermatology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - A Chiricozzi
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - A Costanzo
- Department of Dermatology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - A Conti
- Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - P Dapavo
- Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Second Dermatologic Clinic, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - C De Simone
- Department of Dermatology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - C Foti
- Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Section of Dermatology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - L Naldi
- Department of Dermatology, Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - A Offidani
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Dermatology Unit, Polytechnic Marche University, Ancona, Italy
| | - A Parodi
- Department of Dermatology, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
| | - S Piaserico
- Department of Dermatology, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
| | - F Prignano
- Department of Dermatology, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy
| | - F Rongioletti
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, Section of Dermatology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - L Stingeni
- Department of Medicine, Section of Clinical, Allergological and Venereological Dermatology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - M Talamonti
- Department of Dermatology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - G Girolomoni
- Department of Medicine, Section of Dermatology and Venereology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Several classes of new oral therapy are in use or in development for the treatment of psoriasis. Despite the high efficacy of biologics, new oral therapies remain important as patients generally prefer this mode of administration and they offer an alternative risk-benefit profile. In this review, we discuss the novel modes of action of these drugs, including modulation of cellular pathways involving diverse targets such as Janus kinase, phosphodiesterase 4, sphingosine 1-phosphate, A3 adenosine receptor and rho-associated kinase 2. We review the available evidence around licensed drugs (apremilast) and drugs that are advanced (tofacitinib) or early (ponesimod, baricitinib, peficitinib, INCB039110, CF101, KD025) in the development pipeline. The key limitations of these oral therapies are their modest efficacy profile (apremilast, ponesimod) and the limitations of their safety profile (tofacitinib, ponesimod), while the evidence for the early pipeline drugs are at phase II level only. Potential niches of current unmet needs include apremilast for patients with concomitant psoriatic arthritis, as combination treatments with biologic therapies, and/or for patients in whom multiple biologic therapies have failed due to immunogenicity and secondary inefficacy. The present knowledge gap regarding these novel drugs includes the need for longer clinical trials or observational studies to evaluate safety, and randomised phase III trials for the early pipeline drugs. We conclude that further research and data are necessary to conclusively establish the role of these agents in the current psoriasis treatment paradigm.
Collapse
|
20
|
Volc S, Ghoreschi K. Pathophysiologische Grundlagen der Systemtherapien bei Psoriasis. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2016; 14:557-73. [DOI: 10.1111/ddg.13050_g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2015] [Accepted: 04/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Volc
- Universitäts-Hautklinik; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen; Eberhard Karls Universität; Tübingen
| | - Kamran Ghoreschi
- Universitäts-Hautklinik; Universitätsklinikum Tübingen; Eberhard Karls Universität; Tübingen
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wan J, Imadojemu S, Werth VP. Management of rheumatic and autoimmune blistering disease in pregnancy and postpartum. Clin Dermatol 2016; 34:344-52. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2016.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
22
|
DeCoster E, Alves de Medeiros A, Bostoen J, Stockman A, van Geel N, Lapeere H, Lambert J. A multileveled approach in psoriasis assessment and follow-up: A proposal for a tailored guide for the dermatological practice. J DERMATOL TREAT 2015; 27:298-310. [PMID: 26671313 DOI: 10.3109/09546634.2015.1117566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psoriasis is a complex and heterogeneous disease resulting from interactions between genetic, immunological, and environmental factors. To make the most optimal treatment decision, the dermatologist must therefore have a detailed overview of the patient's history and lifestyle. OBJECTIVES We sought to offer an overview of the various relevant aspects in clinical dermatological assessment of psoriasis patients, emphasizing the importance of a multidisciplinary and integrated clinical approach. METHODS We gathered information on psoriasis management and developed a tailored checklist covering all health-related aspects associated with psoriasis. RESULTS Demographics, personal and family history were elaborately described as well as drug history to discuss how they affect psoriasis management. Relevant patient information such as the vaccination status or cardiovascular profile were included in the checklist as well and treatment recommendations were adapted and updated in accordance with evidence-based literature. This checklist also emphasizes the importance of drug surveillance, proper follow-up and specialist referral, and why the dermatologist needs to address these health-related aspects when assessing psoriasis patients, going beyond optimal skin care. CONCLUSIONS Our comprehensive overview can be used as a consultation checklist for good clinical practice in psoriasis patient management and aid in treatment decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eveline DeCoster
- a Department of Dermatology , Ghent University Hospital , Ghent , Belgium and
| | | | - Jessica Bostoen
- a Department of Dermatology , Ghent University Hospital , Ghent , Belgium and
| | - Annelies Stockman
- b Department of Dermatology , AZ Sint Rembert Hospital , Torhout , Belgium
| | - Nanja van Geel
- a Department of Dermatology , Ghent University Hospital , Ghent , Belgium and
| | - Hilde Lapeere
- a Department of Dermatology , Ghent University Hospital , Ghent , Belgium and
| | - Jo Lambert
- a Department of Dermatology , Ghent University Hospital , Ghent , Belgium and
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hosseini-Carroll P, Mutyala M, Seth A, Nageeb S, Soliman D, Boktor M, Sheth A, Chapman J, Morris J, Jordan P, Manas K, Becker F, Alexander JS. Pregnancy and inflammatory bowel diseases: Current perspectives, risks and patient management. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2015; 6:156-71. [PMID: 26558150 PMCID: PMC4635156 DOI: 10.4292/wjgpt.v6.i4.156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2015] [Revised: 06/30/2015] [Accepted: 08/29/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic idiopathic inflammatory conditions characterized by relapsing and remitting episodes of inflammation which can affect several different regions of the gastrointestinal tract, but also shows extra-intestinal manifestations. IBD is most frequently diagnosed during peak female reproductive years, with 25% of women with IBD conceiving after their diagnosis. While IBD therapy has improved dramatically with enhanced surveillance and more abundant and powerful treatment options, IBD disease can have important effects on pregnancy and presents several challenges for maintaining optimal outcomes for mothers with IBD and the developing fetus/neonate. Women with IBD, the medical team treating them (both gastroenterologists and obstetricians/gynecologists) must often make highly complicated choices regarding conception, pregnancy, and post-natal care (particularly breastfeeding) related to their choice of treatment options at different phases of pregnancy as well as post-partum. This current review discusses current concerns and recommendations for pregnancy during IBD and is intended for gastroenterologists, general practitioners and IBD patients intending to become, (or already) pregnant, and their families. We have addressed patterns of IBD inheritance, effects of IBD on fertility and conception (in both men and women), the effects of IBD disease activity on maintenance of pregnancy and outcomes, risks of diagnostic procedures during pregnancy and potential risks and complications associated with different classes of IBD therapeutics. We also have evaluated the clinical experience using "top-down" care with biologics, which is currently the standard care at our institution. Post-partum care and breastfeeding recommendations are also addressed.
Collapse
|
24
|
Les traitements systémiques du psoriasis. ACTUALITES PHARMACEUTIQUES 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.actpha.2015.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
25
|
Vena GA, Cassano N, Bellia G, Colombo D. Psoriasis in pregnancy: challenges and solutions. PSORIASIS-TARGETS AND THERAPY 2015; 5:83-95. [PMID: 29387585 PMCID: PMC5683115 DOI: 10.2147/ptt.s82975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The available information about the effects of pregnancy on psoriasis and those of psoriasis on pregnancy is almost limited, despite the high frequency of the disease in the general population, as well as in women in reproductive years. Considering the existing evidence, pregnancy does not tend to have a negative influence on psoriasis, as in most women who experience a change in the severity and course of their psoriasis during pregnancy, the change is more likely to be reported as an improvement. This assumption can be applied more convincingly to plaque-type psoriasis, while an exception may be represented by generalized pustular psoriasis, which has been somehow linked to impetigo herpetiformis. Conflicting findings emerged from the few available studies that explored the effect of psoriasis on pregnancy outcomes. Recent studies found an association between moderate-to-severe psoriasis and some pregnancy complications, including pregnancy-induced hypertensive diseases, and have emphasized a trend toward a newborn with low birth weight in patients with psoriasis, especially in those suffering from severe forms. The safety profile during pregnancy is not completely known for many drugs used to treat psoriasis. Moisturizers and low- to moderate-potency topical steroids or ultraviolet B phototherapy represent the first-line therapy for pregnant patients. Many dermatologists may, however, recommend discontinuing all drugs during pregnancy, in consideration of medico-legal issues, and also taking into account that common forms of psoriasis do not compromise the maternal and fetal health. Anyway, for those women whose psoriasis improves during pregnancy, the interruption of any therapy for psoriasis can be a reasonable strategy. The objective of this paper was to review the most relevant literature data on psoriasis in pregnancy, trying to give concurrently practical information about clinical and prognostic aspects, as well as counseling and management.
Collapse
|