Brentuximab a novel antibody therapy: real‐world use confirms efficacy and tolerability for CD30‐positive cutaneous lymphoma

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes With Brentuximab Vedotin or Other Standard Therapies in Patients With Previously Treated Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma in the United States

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

Primary cutaneous anaplastic large-cell lymphomas (pcALCLs) are a type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) in which CD30 is uniformly expressed. In mycosis fungoides (MF), another CTCL, CD30 is heterogeneously expressed. In ALCANZA, patients with pcALCLs or CD30-positive MF randomized to brentuximab vedotin (BV) vs. physician's choice of methotrexate or bexarotene had significantly improved outcomes, including higher objective response rates (ORR) lasting ≥4 months (ORR4), as well as longer median progression-free survival (PFS) and time to next treatment (TTNT). In this study, we sought to assess the real-world impact of treatment with BV in second or later lines of therapy for CTCL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective chart review describes patient characteristics, treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and healthcare resource use (HRU) in patients with pcALCLs or MF previously treated with ≥1 systemic therapy and subsequently treated with BV (n = 139) or other standard therapy (OST; n = 164).

RESULTS

Most patients in the BV cohort (96.4%) received BV as second-line (2L) systemic therapy. The most common OSTs were methotrexate (11.6%), mogamulizumab (9.1%), and bendamustine (9.1%) monotherapies. For 2L BV and OST, median duration of therapy was 8.4 and 5.2 months, real-world ORR was 82.1% and 66.5%, and real-world ORR4 was 42.5% and 25.0%. Real-world 1- and 2-year PFS, TTNT, and OS were significantly longer (all P < .01) and HRU was lower for BV vs. OST.

CONCLUSION

These real-world outcomes are consistent with ALCANZA results, demonstrating favorable outcomes with BV vs. OST in patients with CTCL previously treated with ≥1 systemic therapy.

QuPath Analysis for CD30+ Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Mycosis fungoides is the most common subtype of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, in which the expression of cluster of differentiation 30 (CD30)+ subtype can now be treated with the CD30 antibody conjugate brentuximab vedotin. Diagnostic methods are based on immunohistochemical (IHC) staining followed by manual assessment by pathologists, which is always a subjective calculation. QuPath, an open-source software for digital pathology image analysis, satisfies the requirements of objective approaches.

METHODS

Ten samples from mycosis fungoides patients with CD30 expression at different stages were stained for CD3 and CD30 by IHC staining, scanned, and quantitative analysis was performed using QuPath (version 2.1). Each slide was independently assessed by 3 board-certified dermatopathologists.

RESULTS

Individual estimates for CD30+/CD3+ cells varied among the individual histopathologists (mean coefficient of variation, 0.46; range, 0-0.78). QuPath analysis showed excellent separation between the positively stained cells for CD3 and CD30 IHC and other cells and tissue structures, although the results correlated strongly with the respective mean estimates of the 3 histopathologists (Pearson-R 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

The results show a high interobserver variability evaluation of IHC markers, although quantitative image analysis offer a significant advantage for comparison. This is not only relevant for clinical routine but also especially critical in therapeutic studies addressing targeted molecules.

Immediate Response to Brentuximab Vedotin in a Patient with Localized MF-LCT

The large cell transformation of mycosis fungoides (MF-LCT) is a phenomenon observed in the advanced stages of mycosis fungoides (MF), which is the most common primary cutaneous lymphoma. The diagnostic criteria of MF-LCT are a minimum of 25% of large cells or a formation of microscopic nodules of them in the histological examination of skin samples. The clinical outcomes for MF-LCT are poor, as less than 20% of patients survive 5 years after diagnosis, but the expression of the CD30 antigen is generally considered to be associated with a better prognosis. We present a case of a patient with the diagnosis of MF with LCT, with an ulcerated tumor lesion approximately 30 × 20 cm in size on the right lateral abdominal wall. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) treatment was started due to the presence of the CD30 antigen, with a quick and impressive regression of the cutaneous lesion and tumor mass and good treatment tolerance. After follow-up of 20 months, patient remains in complete remission. A schedule of treatment for MF-LCT is directed mainly by the clinical stage of the disease and the comorbidities; the more severe clinical course of the disease requires systemic treatment. If at least 5% of the cells found in the skin lesions biopsy sample express the CD30 antigen, a beneficial effect of BV treatment could be expected. It may seem that the use of BV is one of the optimal therapeutic options in patients with advanced MF-LCT showing expression of CD30.

Brentuximab vedotin in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas: Data from the Spanish Primary Cutaneous Lymphoma Registry

BACKGROUND

Brentuximab vedotin (BV) has been approved for CD30-expressing cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after at least one previous systemic treatment. However, real clinical practice is still limited.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the response and tolerance of BV in a cohort of patients with CTCL.

METHODS

We analysed CTCL patients treated with BV from the Spanish Primary Cutaneous Lymphoma Registry (RELCP).

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients were included. There were 26 females and the mean age at diagnosis was 59 years. Forty-eight were mycosis fungoides (MF), 7 Sézary syndrome (SS) and 12 CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders (CD30 LPD). Mean follow-up was 18 months. Thirty patients (45%) showed at least 10% of CD30+ cells among the total lymphocytic infiltrate. The median number of BV infusions received was 7. The overall response rate (ORR) was 67% (63% in MF, 71% in SS and 84% in CD30 LPD). Ten of 14 patients with folliculotropic MF (FMF) achieved complete or partial response (ORR 71%). The median time to response was 2.8 months. During follow-up, 36 cases (54%) experienced cutaneous relapse or progression. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 10.3 months. The most frequent adverse event was peripheral neuropathy (PN) (57%), in most patients (85%), grades 1 or 2.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm the efficacy and safety of BV in patients with advanced-stage MF, and CD30 LPD. In addition, patients with FMF and SS also showed a favourable response. Our data suggest that BV retreatment is effective in a proportion of cases.

Cost-effectiveness of brentuximab vedotin for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

Aim: To assess the cost-effectiveness of brentuximab vedotin (BV) versus physician's choice (methotrexate or bexarotene) for treating advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Materials & methods: A partitioned-survival model was developed from the National Health Service perspective in England and Wales. Model inputs were informed by the ALCANZA trial, real-world UK data, published literature or clinical experts. Results: Over the modeled lifetime, BV dominated physician's choice and provided an additional 1.58 life-years and 1.09 higher quality-adjusted life years with a net cost saving of £119,565. The net monetary benefit was £152,326 using a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30,000/quality-adjusted life year. Results were robust in sensitivity and scenario analyses. Conclusion: BV is a highly cost-effective treatment for advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

Disease characteristics, prognosis, and response to therapy in patients with large-cell transformed mycosis fungoides: A single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Mycosis fungoides with large-cell transformation (MF-LCT) is associated with an aggressive clinical course, yet data comparing treatment outcomes in MF-LCT are sparse.

OBJECTIVE

To compare treatment outcomes and to determine disease prevalence and characteristics associated with survival in MF-LCT.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of mycosis fungoides patients from 2012 to 2020 treated at Thomas Jefferson University. Patients with histopathologic diagnosis of MF-LCT were included. Treatment outcomes were assessed by mean changes in the modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) and stage.

RESULTS

Of 171 patients with mycosis fungoides, 23 (13.4%) had histologic diagnosis of MF-LCT. The overall 5-year survival rate for MF-LCT was 74% and was not significantly associated with sex, age, or initial stage at the time of MF-LCT diagnosis. Brentuximab vedotin showed the greatest mean decrease in mSWAT (-20.53) and stage progression (change in Δ stage: -0.4) in MF-LCT compared to oral bexarotene (ΔmSWAT: +4.51; Δstage: +0.27), skin-directed therapy (ΔmSWAT: -5.93; Δstage: -0.08), and chemotherapy (ΔmSWAT: +4.97; Δstage: +0.85).

LIMITATIONS

Single-center retrospective design, and patients often on multiple treatment modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

We report superior treatment outcomes for brentuximab vedotin compared to oral bexarotene, skin-directed therapy, and chemotherapy in MF-LCT in both early and advanced disease.

Multicentric EORTC retrospective study shows efficacy of brentuximab vedotin in patients who have mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome with variable CD30 positivity

BACKGROUND

Brentuximab vedotin (BV) was approved as a therapy for mycosis fungoides (MF) based on the ALCANZA trial. Little real-world data, however, are available.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of BV in patients with MF/Sézary Syndrome (SS) with variable CD30 positivity in a real-world cohort and to explore potential predictors of response.

METHODS

Data from 72 patients with MF/SS across nine EORTC (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) centres were included. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the proportion of patients with: overall response (ORR), ORR lasting over 4 months (ORR4), time to response (TTR), response duration (RD), progression-free survival (PFS) and time to next treatment (TTNT). Secondary aims included a safety evaluation and the association of clinicopathological features with ORR, RD and TTNT.

RESULTS

All 72 patients had received at least one systemic treatment. ORR was achieved in 45 of 67; ORR4 in 28 of 67 with a median TTR of 8 weeks [interquartile range (IQR) 5·5-14] and with a median RD of 9 months (IQR 3·4-14). Median PFS was 7 months (IQR 2-12) and median TTNT was 30 days (6-157·5). Patient response, RD, PFS and TTNT were not associated with any clinicopathological characteristics. In the MF group, patients with stage IIB/III vs. IV achieved longer PFS and had a higher percentage of ORR4. There was a statistically significant association between large-cell transformation and skin ORR (P = 0·03). ORR4 was more frequently achieved in patients without lymph node involvement (P = 0·04).

CONCLUSIONS

BV is an effective option for patients with MF/SS, including those with variable CD30 positivity, large-cell transformation, SS, longer disease duration and who have been treated previously with several therapies.

Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas-An update 2021

Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) represent the majority of primary cutaneous lymphomas (CL). Mycosis fungoides (MF) and cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders account for 80% of all CTCL. CTCL show overlapping histological features. Thus clinical-pathological correlation is of importance to achieve final diagnosis. MF shows a characteristic evolution with patches, plaques, and in a subset of patients (10%-20%) with tumors. Therapy is stage-adapted with skin-directed therapies such as UV-light therapies and corticosteroids in early disease stage (i.e., patch and limited plaque stage) and systemic therapies (retinoids, interferon, mono chemotherapy, targeted therapy) and/or radiation therapy (local or total skin beam electron) in advanced stages. Novel therapies include targeted therapy such as mogamulizumab (anti-CCR4) or brentuximab vedotin (anti-CD30) and histone deacetylase inhibitors. Considering the impact of targeted therapies, biomarkers such as CD30 are not only crucial for the diagnosis and correct classification of an individual lymphoma case, but also for therapy as they may represent therapeutic targets. In the recently revised WHO classification 2017 and the updated WHO-EORTC classification for CL 2018, primary cutaneous CD8+ acral T-cell lymphoma has been introduced as a new still provisional entity. It displays characteristic clinical, histological, and phenotypic features and exhibits an excellent prognosis. Rare, but aggressive CTCL include cutaneous primary cutaneous aggressive epidermotropic CD8-positive T-cell lymphoma and cutaneous gamma/delta T-cell lymphoma, which present with rapid onset of necrotic or ulcerated plaques and tumors. As they have a poor prognosis, treatment includes multiagent chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

The changing therapeutic landscape, burden of disease, and unmet needs in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) have a chronic, relapsing course, and the most common subtypes are mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. The disease causes visible skin alterations and can also cause alopecia, pruritus and pain, all of which can impact patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The goal of treatment is to reduce symptoms and prevent disease progression. However, treatment recommendations are often based on low levels of evidence due to the lack of well-designed randomised clinical trials and treatment guidelines, and approved drugs vary considerably across different countries and regions. Currently, available treatments rarely lead to durable remissions and eventually become less effective, meaning patients often require multiple therapy changes. Skin-directed therapies (SDTs) are first-line treatments for early-stage CTCL, whereas systemic therapies may be needed for early-stage disease that does not respond to SDT or for advanced-stage disease. However, patients can experience significant side-effects with these treatments or may be unable to tolerate them. Hence, there is an unmet need for effective therapies with good safety profiles for the treatment of early- and late-stage CTCL. Here, we review current treatment guidelines, investigational and approved treatments, the impact of CTCL on patients' HRQoL, and the treatment of pruritus.