An additional drug repurposing study for hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa

Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Comorbid Disorder Biomarkers, Druggable Genes, New Drugs and Drug Repurposing-A Molecular Meta-Analysis

Chronic inflammation and dysregulated epithelial differentiation, especially of hair follicle keratinocytes, have been suggested as the major pathogenetic pathways of hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS). On the other hand, obesity and metabolic syndrome have additionally been considered as an important risk factor. With adalimumab, a drug has already been approved and numerous other compounds are in advanced-stage clinical studies. A systematic review was conducted to detect and corroborate HS pathogenetic mechanisms at the molecular level and identify HS molecular markers. The obtained data were used to confirm studied and off-label administered drugs and to identify additional compounds for drug repurposing. A robust, strongly associated group of HS biomarkers was detected. The triad of HS pathogenesis, namely upregulated inflammation, altered epithelial differentiation and dysregulated metabolism/hormone signaling was confirmed, the molecular association of HS with certain comorbid disorders, such as inflammatory bowel disease, arthritis, type I diabetes mellitus and lipids/atherosclerosis/adipogenesis was verified and common biomarkers were identified. The molecular suitability of compounds in clinical studies was confirmed and 31 potential HS repurposing drugs, among them 10 drugs already launched for other disorders, were detected. This systematic review provides evidence for the importance of molecular studies to advance the knowledge regarding pathogenesis, future treatment and biomarker-supported clinical course follow-up in HS.

[Clinical, pathology-associated and molecular biomarkers of hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa]

Hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa is a scarring disease of the intertrigines that is now intensively researched. Improved pathogenetic understanding has led to the introduction of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF‑α) inhibition, which represents a major advance over traditional broad immunosuppression and antibiotic administration. In addition, a wide range of newer and promising treatments is or is about to be clinically evaluated. These include various specific antibodies against cytokines and the complement system and small molecules. Successful use of the individual drugs depends on the stratification of suitable patient groups with the help of clinically relevant biomarkers. While molecular investigations have shown a number of possible biomarkers and/or therapeutic target molecules, the detection of robust predictive biomarkers is still in its initial phase. In summary, the therapeutic options for hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa are improving through the introduction of new drugs, possibly in combination with surgical interventions, whereby the possibilities for predictive therapeutic decisions through the discovery of biomarkers would revolutionize the chances of therapeutic success.

Target molecules for future hidradenitis suppurativa treatment

The registration of the tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor adalimumab in 2015 was a major step forward in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS). However, it soon became evident that the effectiveness of adalimumab in daily practice was highly variable. A significant unmet medical need of HS patients remained, and the search for novel therapeutic targets was intensified. During the 10th European Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation (EHSF) e.V. Conference, reknown international HS investigators virtually presented and discussed the published data on these potential target molecules for future HS treatment. This article addresses the most promising molecules currently under investigation from a pathophysiological and clinical point of view. With phase III trials ongoing, the anti- interleukin (IL)-17 biologics bimekizumab and secukinumab are in the most advanced stage of clinical development showing promising results. In addition, targeting IL-1α with bermekimab has shown encouraging results in two clinical trials. Directing treatment at neutrophil recruitment and activation by targeting IL-36 with spesolimab fits well in the pathogenic concept of HS and clinical phase II trial results are pending. In contrast to in situ evidence, Complement 5a (C5a) and C5a receptor blockade have only shown greater clinical benefit in patients with severe HS. Inhibition of Janus kinase (JAK) 1 signalling in HS showed clinical efficacy only in the highest dosage, highlighting that careful surveillance of the balance between safety and efficacy of JAK inhibition is warranted. Overall, clinical efficacies of all novel treatments reported so far are modest. To guide drug development, more and better-defined translational data on the pathogenesis of this severe and enigmatic inflammatory skin disease are required.

Potential predictive biomarkers of adalimumab response in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Adalimumab provides significant efficacy for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), which was demonstrated by at least 50% of patients achieving a clinical response by week 12 that was maintained through to week 168 in the PIONEER trials.

OBJECTIVES

To identify whether there are biomarkers that could predict adalimumab response, as well as markers that differentially respond to adalimumab in patients with HS.

METHODS

Baseline and week-12 plasma samples from the PIONEER studies were used to assess the levels of circulating proteins by multiplex and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

RESULTS

Analyses revealed significantly higher high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and chemokine (C-C motif) ligand (CCL) 16 (HCC-4) levels in nonresponders at baseline and identified a multivariate response signature of calprotectin, fractalkine and HCC-4, reaching an 86% predictive accuracy rate for adalimumab response. Additionally, post-treatment reduction of plasma C-X-C motif chemokine ligand (CXCL)9, CXCL8 (interleukin-8) and CCL19 (macrophage inflammatory protein 3β) were greater in adalimumab super-responders than in nonresponders (P = 0·026, P = 0·044 and P = 0·026, respectively). These cytokines are involved in the recruitment of innate and adaptive inflammatory cells, and/or stimulation of certain inflammatory responses, suggesting that these pathways could be disease drivers in adalimumab nonresponders.

CONCLUSIONS

These initial results suggest HCC-4, calprotectin and fractalkine could be potential predictive biomarkers of adalimumab response in HS and identified possible tumour necrosis factor-independent disease pathways.