Clinical significance of minimal residual disease in patients with acute leukaemia undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

89Zr-immunoPET-guided selection of a CD33xIL15 fusion protein optimized for antitumor immune cell activation and in vivo tumour retention in acute myeloid leukaemia

PURPOSE

Immune cells are capable of eliminating leukemic cells, as evidenced by outcomes in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, patients who fail induction therapy will not benefit from HCT due to their minimal residual disease (MRD) status. Thus, we aimed to develop an immunomodulatory agent to reduce MRD by activating immune effector cells in the presence of leukaemia cells via a novel fusion protein that chimerises two clinically tolerated biologics: a CD33 antibody and the IL15Ra/IL15 complex (CD33xIL15).

METHODS

We generated a set of CD33xIL15 fusion protein constructs with varying configurations and identified those with the best in vitro AML-binding, T cell activation, and NK cell potentiation. Using 89Zr-immunoPET imaging we then evaluated the biodistribution and in vivo tumour retention of the most favourable CD33xIL15 constructs in an AML xenograft model. Ex vivo biodistribution studies were used to confirm the pharmacokinetics of the constructs.

RESULTS

Two of the generated fusion proteins, CD33xIL15 (N72D) and CD33xIL15wt, demonstrated optimal in vitro behaviour and were further evaluated in vivo. These studies revealed that the CD33xIL15wt candidate was capable of being retained in the tumour for as long as its parental CD33 antibody, Lintuzumab (13.9 ± 3.1%ID/g vs 18.6 ± 1.1%ID/g at 120 h).

CONCLUSION

This work demonstrates that CD33xIL15 fusion proteins are capable of targeting leukemic cells and stimulating local T cells in vitro and of concentrating in the tumour in AML xenografts. It also highlights the importance of 89Zr-immunoPET to guide the development and selection of tumour-targeted antibody-cytokine fusion proteins.

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is a haematological malignancy characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of immature lymphoid cells. Over past decades, significant progress has been made in understanding the biology of ALL, resulting in remarkable improvements in its diagnosis, treatment and monitoring. Since the advent of chemotherapy, ALL has been the platform to test for innovative approaches applicable to cancer in general. For example, the advent of omics medicine has led to a deeper understanding of the molecular and genetic features that underpin ALL. Innovations in genomic profiling techniques have identified specific genetic alterations and mutations that drive ALL, inspiring new therapies. Targeted agents, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapies, have shown promising results in subgroups of patients while minimizing adverse effects. Furthermore, the development of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy represents a breakthrough in ALL treatment, resulting in remarkable responses and potential long-term remissions. Advances are not limited to treatment modalities alone. Measurable residual disease monitoring and ex vivo drug response profiling screening have provided earlier detection of disease relapse and identification of exceptional responders, enabling clinicians to adjust treatment strategies for individual patients. Decades of supportive and prophylactic care have improved the management of treatment-related complications, enhancing the quality of life for patients with ALL.

Blinatumomab Therapy Is Associated with Favorable Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Pediatric Patients with B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blinatumomab, a bispecific T cell engager that binds CD19 in leukemic cells and CD3 in cytotoxic T cells and leads to leukemic blast lysis, is often used in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Concerns about the potential risk of blinatumomab-related immune-mediated toxicities after allo-HCT have not been adequately addressed. These include graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), delayed engraftment, and graft failure or rejection. Pediatric-specific data reporting post-HCT outcomes of patients treated with blinatumomab are scarce and limited to small cohorts. We sought to investigate the clinical outcomes of pediatric patients with R/R B-ALL who received blinatumomab therapy pre-HCT, focusing on overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM), as well as the incidence of immune-mediated post-HCT complications including GVHD, delayed neutrophil or platelet engraftment, graft failure, and graft rejection. We also investigated blinatumomab's effects on B cell reconstitution based on achievement of i.v. immunoglobulin (IVIG) independence post-HCT. This single-center, retrospective study included patients with B-ALL receiving blinatumomab therapy before undergoing allo-HCT, with transplantation performed between 2016 and 2021 at our institution. Patients receiving blinatumomab for relapse after allo-HCT were excluded. Patients receiving chemotherapy alone before allo-HCT during the same period composed the control group. Seventy-two patients were included, 31 of whom received blinatumomab before allo-HCT. Survival estimates were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to analyze differences between groups. Categorical variables were compared between groups using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test, and continuous variables were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Cumulative incidences were estimated using the competing risks method, and Gray's test was used to analyze differences between groups. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for univariate and multivariable analyses for OS. Landmark analysis was performed at the set time points of 30 days and 100 days post-allo-HCT. Most patients in the study cohort had high-risk relapsed B-ALL. Blinatumomab therapy induced minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative remissions in all patients, whereas 5 patients (12.2%) receiving chemotherapy alone had persistent MRD pre-allo-HCT. Time from the start of therapy to the date of allo-HCT was shorter for patients who received blinatumomab compared with those who received chemotherapy (P < .0001). Blinatumomab therapy was associated with greater LFS compared to chemotherapy alone (P = .049), but when limited to 1 year, LFS was not significantly different from control (P = .066). There appeared to be higher OS, lower CIR, and lower NRM in patients receiving blinatumomab compared to the control group; however, the differences were not significant. None of the variables assessed in multivariable analysis was associated with differences in OS. When compared to the controls, blinatumomab therapy did not result in a higher incidence of acute or chronic GVHD, delayed neutrophil or platelet engraftment, or graft failure or rejection. The time to IVIG infusion independence post-allo-HCT was similar in the 2 groups. This study supports the use of blinatumomab salvage therapy for R/R B-ALL before allo-HCT given its efficacy in inducing MRD-negative remissions and optimizing LFS, as well as its lack of association with an increased incidence of post-allo-HCT adverse immune-mediated toxicities. Larger, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and to investigate blinatumomab's effects in long-term post-allo-HCT events.

Updates on lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma classification and minimal/measurable residual disease analysis

Lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ALL/LBL), especially certain subtypes, continues to confer morbidity and mortality despite significant therapeutic advances. The pathologic classification of ALL/LBL, especially that of B-ALL, has recently substantially expanded with the identification of several distinct and prognostically important genetic drivers. These discoveries are reflected in both current classification systems, the World Health Organization (WHO) 5th edition and the new International Consensus Classification (ICC). In this article, novel subtypes of B-ALL are reviewed, including DUX4, MEF2D and ZNF384-rearranged B-ALL; the rare pediatric entity B-ALL with TLF3::HLF, now added to the classifications, is discussed; updates to the category of B-ALL with BCR::ABL1-like features (Ph-like B-ALL) are summarized; and emerging genetic subtypes of T-ALL are presented. The second half of the article details current approaches to minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) detection in B-ALL and T-ALL and presents anticipated challenges to current approaches in the burgeoning era of antigen-directed immunotherapy.

More than two courses of pre-transplant consolidation therapy benefits patients with acute myeloid leukemia in the first complete remission who underwent human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling allografts: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Although the need for consolidation chemotherapy after successful induction therapy is well established in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1), the value of consolidation chemotherapy before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains controversial.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared the effect of the number of pre-transplant consolidation chemotherapies on outcomes of human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling stem cell transplantation (MSDT) for patients with AML in CR1 in multicenters across China. In our study, we analyzed data of 373 AML patients in CR1 from three centers across China.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 969 days, patients with ≥ 3 courses of consolidation chemotherapy had higher probabilities of leukemia-free survival (LFS) (85.6% vs . 67.0%, P < 0.001) and overall survival (89.2% vs . 78.5%, P  = 0.007), and better cumulative incidences of relapse (10.5% vs . 19.6%, P  = 0.020) and non-relapse mortality (4.2% vs . 14.9%, P  = 0.001) than those with ≤ 2 courses of consolidation chemotherapy. Pre-transplantation minimal residual disease-negative patients with AML in CR1 who received MSDT with ≥ 3 courses of consolidation chemotherapy had a higher probability of LFS (85.9% vs . 67.7%, P  = 0.003) and a lower cumulative incidence of relapse (9.6% vs . 23.3%, P  = 0.013) than those with ≤ 2 courses.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that patients with AML in CR1 who received MSDT might benefit from pre-transplant consolidation chemotherapy.

Preemptive interferon-α therapy could prevent relapse of acute myeloid leukemia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A real-world analysis

Introduction

Measurable residual disease (MRD)-directed interferon-a treatment (i.e. preemptive IFN-α treatment) can eliminate the MRD in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Therefore, this study aimed to further assess its efficacy in a multicenter retrospective study in a real-world setting.

Methods

A total of 247 patientswho received preemptive IFN-α treatment were recruited from 4 hospitals in China. The protocols for MRD monitoring mainly based on quantitative polymerase chain reaction [qPCR] and multiparameter flow cytometry [MFC].

Results

The median duration of IFN-α treatment was 56 days (range, 1-1211 days). The cumulative incidences of all grades acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), all grades chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), and severe cGVHD at 3 years after IFN-α therapy were 2.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-3.8%), 53.2% (95% CI, 46.8-59.7%), and 6.2% (95% CI, 3.1-9.2%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of achieving MRD negative state at 2 years after IFN-α treatment was 78.2% (95% CI, 72.6-83.7%). The 3-year cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality following IFN-α therapy were 20.9% (95% CI, 15.5-26.3%) and 4.9% (95%CI, 2.0-7.7%), respectively. The probabilities of leukemia-free survival and overall survival at 3 years following IFN-α therapy were 76.9% (95% CI, 71.5-82.7%) and 84.2% (95% CI, 78.7-90.1%), respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that MRD positive state by qPCR and MFC before IFN-α treatment, high-risk disease risk index before allo-HSCT, and receiving identical sibling donor HSCT were associated with a higher risk of relapse and a poorer leukemia-free survival. Severe cGVHD was associated with an increased risk of non-relapse mortality.

Discussion

Thus, real-world data suggest that preemptive IFN-α is effective for treating patients with AML with MRD after allo-HSCT.

A Review of CAR-T Therapy in Pediatric and Young Adult B-Lineage Acute Leukemia: Clinical Perspectives in Singapore

Approximately 10-15% of pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) are high risk at diagnosis or relapsed/ refractory. Prior to the availability of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) in Singapore and the region, the treatment options for these paediatric and young adults are conventional salvage chemotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy regimens as a bridge to allogeneic total body irradiation-based hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). This results in significant acute and long-term toxicities, with suboptimal survival outcomes. Finding a curative salvage therapy with fewer long-term toxicities would translate to improved quality-adjusted life years in these children and young adults. In this review, we focus on the burden of relapsed/refractory pediatric B-ALL, the limitations of current strategies, the emerging paradigms for the role of CAR-T in r/r B-ALL, our local perspectives on the health economics and future direction of CAR-T therapies in pediatric patients.

Immunophenotypic measurable residual disease monitoring in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) offers a survival benefit to adult patients affected by acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, to avoid an overt disease relapse, patients with pre or post transplant persistence or occurrence of measurable residual disease (MRD) may require cellular or pharmacological interventions with eventual side effects. While the significance of multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) in the guidance of ALL treatment in both adult and pediatric patients is undebated, fewer data are available regarding the impact of MRD monitoring, as assessed by MFC analysis, in the allo-HSCT settings. Aim of this article is to summarize and discuss currently available information on the role of MFC detection of MRD in adult ALL patients undergoing allo-HSCT. The significance of MFC-based MRD according to sensitivity level, timing, and in relation to molecular techniques of MRD and chimerism assessment will be also discussed.

Preemptive Interferon-α Therapy Could Protect Against Relapse and Improve Survival of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Long-Term Results of Two Registry Studies

For allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients, preemptive interferon-α (IFN-α) therapy is considered as a useful method to eliminate the minimal residual disease (MRD). Our purpose is to assess the long-term efficacy of preemptive IFN-α therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients following allo-HSCT based on two registry studies (#NCT02185261 and #NCT02027064). We would present the final data and unpublished results of long-term clinical outcomes with extended follow-up. We adopted polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) to monitor MRD, and a positive result of bone marrow specimen examined by either of them would be identified as the MRD-positive status. Subcutaneous injections of recombinant human IFN-α-2b were performed for 6 cycles, and prolonged IFN-α therapy could be permitted at the request of patients. The median cycles were 3.5 (range, 0.5-30.5) cycles. A total of 9 patients suffered from grade ≥3 toxicities (i.e., infectious: n = 6; hematologic: n = 3). The 6-year cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality following IFN-α therapy were 13.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.4-20.6%) and 3.9% (95%CI, 0.0-17.6%), respectively. The probability of disease-free survival at 6 years following IFN-α therapy was 83.1% (95%CI, 75.2-91.9%). The probability of overall survival at 6 years following IFN-α therapy was 88.3% (95%CI, 81.4-95.8%). The cumulative incidences of total chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) and severe cGVHD at 6 years following IFN-α therapy were 66.2% (95%CI, 55.5-77.0%) and 10.4% (95%CI, 3.6-17.2%), respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that an alternative donor was associated with a lower risk of relapse and the better disease-free survival. Thus, preemptive IFN-α therapy could clear MRD persistently, prevent relapse truly, and improve long-term survival in AML patients following allo-HSCT.

Clinical experience of CAR T cells for B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has transformed the treatment for both pediatric and adult patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Clinical trial results across multiple institutions with different CAR constructs report significant response rates in treated patients. One product (tisagenlecleucel) is currently FDA approved for the treatment of R/R B-ALL in patients <26 y/o. Successful application of this therapy is limited by high relapse rates, potential for significant toxicity, and logistical issues surrounding collection/production. Herein, we review published data on the use of CAR T cells for B-ALL, including results from early pivotal clinical trials, relapse data, incidence of toxicity, and mechanisms to optimize CAR T cell therapy.

Syngeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: a propensity score-matched analysis

The present study evaluated outcomes and prognostic factors in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after syngeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Among patients in first complete remission (CR1), outcomes of syngeneic HSCT (Syn) were compared with those of autologous HSCT (Auto), allogeneic HSCT from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor (MSD), or allogeneic HSCT from HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD). Among 11,866 patients receiving first HSCT, 26 in the Syn group were analyzed. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate, the cumulative incidence of relapse, and the cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 47.8%, 59.6%, and 4.6%, respectively. The OS was significantly better in patients in CR1 (n = 13) than in patients in non-CR1 (P = 0.012). Furthermore, 39 patients in CR1 each were assigned to the Auto, MSD, and MUD groups using propensity score matching. The 5-year OS in the Syn (68.4%) was not significantly different from those in the Auto (55.9%, P = 0.265), MSD (62.4%, P = 0.419), or MUD (63.7%, P = 0.409) groups. A higher relapse in the Syn than in the MSD and MUD groups was offset by lower NRM. In summary, syngeneic HSCT might be an alternative option for AML patients in CR1.

Utilizing the prognostic impact of minimal residual disease in treatment decisions for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the first pediatric cancer where the assessment of early response to therapy by minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring has demonstrated its importance to improve risk-based treatment approaches. The most standardized tools to study MRD in ALL are multiparametric flow cytometry and realtime-quantitative polymerase chain reaction amplification-based methods. In recent years, MRD measurement has reached greater levels of sensitivity and standardization through international laboratory networks collaboration.

AREAS COVERED

We herewith describe how to assess and apply the prognostic impact of MRD in treatment decisions, with specific focus on pediatric ALL. We also highlight the role of MRD monitoring in the context of genetically homogeneous subgroups of pediatric ALL. However, some queries remain to be addressed and emerging technologies hold the promise of improving MRD detection in ALL patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Emerging technologies, like next generation flow cytometry, droplet digital PCR, and next generation sequencing appear to be important methods for assessing MRD in pediatric ALL. These more specific and/or sensitive MRD monitoring methods may help to predict relapse with greater accuracy, and are currently being used in clinical trials to improve pediatric ALL outcome by optimizing patient stratification and earlier MRD-based interventional therapy.

Applicability of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction for minimal residual disease monitoring in Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

In Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (Ph+ ALL), minimal residual disease (MRD) is the most relevant prognostic factor. Currently, its evaluation is based on quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (Q‐RT‐PCR). Digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) was successfully applied to several haematological malignancies. We analyzed 98 samples from 40 Ph+ ALL cases, the majority enrolled in the GIMEMA LAL2116 trial: 10 diagnostic samples and 88 follow‐up samples, mostly focusing on positive non‐quantifiable (PNQ) or negative samples by Q‐RT‐PCR to investigate the value of ddPCR for MRD monitoring. DdPCR BCR/ABL1 assay showed good sensitivity and accuracy to detect low levels of transcripts, with a high rate of reproducibility. The analysis of PNQ or negative cases by Q‐RT‐PCR revealed that ddPCR increased the proportion of quantifiable samples (p < 0.0001). Indeed, 29/54 PNQ samples (53.7%) proved positive and quantifiable by ddPCR, whereas 13 (24.1%) were confirmed as PNQ by ddPCR and 12 (22.2%) proved negative. Among 24 Q‐RT‐PCR‐negative samples, 13 (54.1%) were confirmed negative, four (16.7%) resulted PNQ and seven (29.2%) proved positive and quantifiable by ddPCR. Four of 5 patients, evaluated at different time points, who were negative by Q‐RT‐PCR and positive by ddPCR experienced a relapse. DdPCR appears useful for MRD monitoring in adult Ph+ ALL.

Pre-transplant minimal residual disease assessment and transplant-related factors predict the outcome of acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation

We studied pretransplant minimal residual disease (MRD) in 224 patients (median age 44 years; range 17-65) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in complete remission. MRD was evaluated on marrow samples using multicolor flow cytometry and assessment of WT1 gene expression. Both methods showed a strong prognostic value and their combination allowed the identification of three groups of patients with different risk of relapse. In multivariate analysis, combined MRD was the only predictor of cumulative incidence of relapse, regardless of donor type, conditioning regimen, first or second CR at HSCT, HSCT year, and ELN risk group. Multivariate regression model showed that only negative combined MRD status (P < .001) and myeloablative conditioning (P = .004) were independently associated with better OS. Among MRD-positive patients, a reduced incidence of relapse was observed in patients receiving haplo transplant (P < .05) and in patients who showed grade II-IV aGVHD (P < .03). In patients with negative combined MRD, the intensity of conditioning regimen did not affect the overall favorable outcome. We suggest that pretransplant MRD evaluation combined with transplant-related factors can identify AML patients at higher risk for relapse and might help in defining the overall transplant strategy.

A risk score system for stratifying the risk of relapse in B cell acute lymphocytic leukemia patients after allogenic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

For patients with B cell acute lymphocytic leukemia (B-ALL) who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), many variables have been demonstrated to be associated with leukemia relapse. In this study, we attempted to establish a risk score system to predict transplant outcomes more precisely in patients with B-ALL after allo-SCT.

METHODS

A total of 477 patients with B-ALL who underwent allo-SCT at Peking University People's Hospital from December 2010 to December 2015 were enrolled in this retrospective study. We aimed to evaluate the factors associated with transplant outcomes after allo-SCT, and establish a risk score to identify patients with different probabilities of relapse. The univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with the Cox proportional hazards model with time-dependent variables.

RESULTS

All patients achieved neutrophil engraftment, and 95.4% of patients achieved platelet engraftment. The 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), and non-relapse mortality were 20.7%, 70.4%, 65.6%, and 13.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with positive post-transplantation minimal residual disease (MRD), transplanted beyond the first complete remission (≥CR2), and without chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) had higher CIR (P  < 0.001, P = 0.004, and P  < 0.001, respectively) and worse LFS (P  < 0.001, P = 0.017, and P  < 0.001, respectively), and OS (P  < 0.001, P = 0.009, and P  < 0.001, respectively) than patients without MRD after transplantation, transplanted in CR1, and with cGVHD. A risk score for predicting relapse was formulated with the three above variables. The 5-year relapse rates were 6.3%, 16.6%, 55.9%, and 81.8% for patients with scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 (P  < 0.001), respectively, while the 5-year LFS and OS values decreased with increasing risk score.

CONCLUSION

This new risk score system might stratify patients with different risks of relapse, which could guide treatment.

Low toxicity and favorable overall survival in relapsed/refractory B-ALL following CAR T cells and CD34-selected T-cell depleted allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant

To define the tolerability and outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) following CAR T-cell therapy, we retrospectively reviewed pediatric/young adult patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL who underwent this treatment. Fifteen patients (median age 13 years; range 1-20 years) with a median potential follow-up of 39 months demonstrated 24-month cumulative incidence of relapse, cumulative incidence of TRM, and OS of 16% (95% CI: 0-37%), 20% (95% CI: 0-40%), and 80% (95% CI: 60-100%), respectively. Severe toxicity following CAR T cells did not impact OS (p = 0.27), while greater time from CAR T cells to allo-HSCT (>80 days) was associated with a decrease in OS. In comparing CD34-selected T-cell depleted (TCD; n = 9) vs unmodified (n = 6) allo-HSCT, the cumulative incidence of relapse, TRM, and OS at 24 months was 22% (95% CI: 0-49%) vs 0% (p = 0.14), 0% vs 50% [95% CI: 10-90%] (p = 0.02) and 100% vs 50% [95% CI: 10-90%] (p = 0.02). In this small cohort of patients, CAR T cells followed by a CD34-selected TCD allo-HSCT appears to result in less TRM and favorable OS when compared with unmodified allo-HSCT. There was no evidence that disease control was impacted by the type of consolidative allo-HSCT, which demonstrates the feasibility of this approach.

Reducing minimal residual disease with blinatumomab prior to HCT for pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Children treated with blinatumomab for B-ALL with MRD had few side effects and proceeded to hematopoietic cell transplant without delay. Blinatumomab given prior to transplant reduces MRD and results in favorable leukemia-free survival, toxicity, and overall survival.

Allogeneic FLT3 CAR T Cells with an Off-Switch Exhibit Potent Activity against AML and Can Be Depleted to Expedite Bone Marrow Recovery

Patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have a dismal prognosis and limited treatment options. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have achieved unprecedented clinical responses in patients with B cell leukemias and lymphomas and could prove highly efficacious in AML. However, a significant number of patients with AML may not receive treatment with an autologous product due to manufacturing failures associated with low lymphocyte counts or rapid disease progression while the therapeutic is being produced. We report the preclinical evaluation of an off-the-shelf CAR T cell therapy targeting Fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) for the treatment of AML. Single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) targeting various epitopes in the extracellular region of FLT3 were inserted into CAR constructs and tested for their ability to redirect T cell specificity and effector function to FLT3⁺ AML cells. A lead CAR, exhibiting minimal tonic signaling and robust activity in vitro and in vivo, was selected and then modified to incorporate a rituximab-responsive off-switch in cis. We found that allogeneic FLT3 CAR T cells, generated from healthy-donor T cells, eliminate primary AML blasts but are also active against mouse and human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, indicating risk of myelotoxicity. By employing a surrogate CAR with affinity to murine FLT3, we show that rituximab-mediated depletion of FLT3 CAR T cells after AML eradication enables bone marrow recovery without compromising leukemia remission. These results support clinical investigation of allogeneic FLT3 CAR T cells in AML and other FLT3⁺ hematologic malignancies.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can improve the prognosis of high-risk pediatric t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia in first remission based on MRD-guided treatment

Background

Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with t(8;21) (q22;q22) is classified as a low-risk group. However, relapse is still the main factor affecting survival. We aimed to investigate the effect of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) on reducing recurrence and improving the survival of high-risk pediatric t(8;21) AML based on minimal residual disease (MRD)-guided treatment, and to further explore the prognostic factors to guide risk stratification treatment and identify who will benefit from allo-HSCT.

Methods

Overall, 129 newly diagnosed pediatric t(8;21) AML patients were included in this study. Patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk group according to RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcript levels after 2 cycles of consolidation chemotherapy. High-risk patients were divided into HSCT group and chemotherapy group according to their treatment choices. The characteristics and outcomes of 125 patients were analyzed.

Results

For high-risk patients, allo-HSCT could improve 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate compared to chemotherapy (87.4% vs. 61.9%; P = 0.026). Five-year overall survival (OS) rate in high-risk HSCT group had a trend for better than that in high-risk chemotherapy group (82.8% vs. 71.4%; P = 0.260). The 5-year RFS rate of patients with a c-KIT mutation in high-risk HSCT group had a trend for better than that of patients with a c-KIT mutation in high-risk chemotherapy group (82.9% vs. 75%; P = 0.400). Extramedullary infiltration (EI) at diagnosis was associated with a high cumulative incidence of relapse for high-risk patients (50% vs. 18.4%; P = 0.004); allo-HSCT can improve the RFS (P = 0.009).

Conclusions

allo-HSCT can improve the prognosis of high-risk pediatric t(8;21) AML based on MRD-guided treatment. Patients with a c-KIT mutation may benefit from allo-HSCT. EI is an independent prognostic factor for high-risk patients and allo-HSCT can improve the prognosis.

Monosomal karyotype affecting outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the prognostic impact of MK on postremission outcomes of AML patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in the first complete remission (CR1).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 465 adult patients with AML who had received HSCT in the first CR between 2000 and 2016.

RESULTS

In MK + AML, the median leukocyte count was significantly lower (P < .001) and no NPM1 mutation was found (P = .042). Multivariate analysis revealed that MK was the most powerful prognostic factors for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.6; P = .001), EFS (HR, 3.8; P < .001), and cumulative incidence of relapse (HR, 6.1; P < .001), compared to any other poor risk factors such as complex karyotype, FLT3-ITD mutations, old age, and higher leukocyte count. The adverse prognostic impact of MK tended to be more prominent in the younger age group (<40 years) (HR, 6.3, P < .001) than in the older age group (≥40 years) (HR, 3.4, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Novel treatment modalities for MK + AML need to be investigated to reduce the risk of relapse after HSCT.

Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Minimal residual disease (MRD) refers to a chemotherapy/radiotherapy-surviving leukemia cell population that gives rise to relapse of the disease. The detection of MRD is critical for predicting the outcome and for selecting the intensity of further treatment strategies. The development of various new diagnostic platforms, including next-generation sequencing (NGS), has introduced significant advances in the sensitivity of MRD diagnostics. Here, we review current methods to diagnose MRD through phenotypic marker patterns or differential gene patterns through analysis by flow cytometry (FCM), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR), reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or NGS. Future advances in clinical procedures will be molded by practical feasibility and patient needs regarding greater diagnostic sensitivity.

Monitoring minimal residual/relapsing disease after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Relapse after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is a major cause of death in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Here, we retrospectively analysed the contributions of lineage-sorted donor cell chimerism (sDCC) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) targeting disease-specific genetic rearrangements to detect minimal residual/relapsing disease (MRD) and predict impending relapse in 94 adult ALL patients after SCT. With a median follow-up of surviving patients (n = 61) of 3.3 years, qPCR and/or sDCC measurements turned positive in 38 patients (40%). Of these, 22 patients relapsed and 16 remained in complete remission. At 3 years, qPCR and/or sDCC positive patients showed an increased incidence of relapse (50% vs. 4%, p < 0.0001), decreased relapse-free survival (RFS, 40% vs. 85%, p < 0.0001), and decreased overall survival (OS, 47% vs. 87%, p 0.004). Both, qPCR and sDCC pre-detected 11 of 21 relapses occurring within the first two years after SCT and, overall, complemented for each other method in four of the relapsing and four of the non-relapsing cases. Patients receiving pre-emptive MRD-driven interventions (n = 11) or not (n = 10) showed comparable median times until relapse, RFS, and OS. In our single centre cohort, qPCR and sDCC were similarly effective and complementary helpful to indicate haematological relapse of ALL after SCT.

The treatment of adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with ALL represent a unique population in terms of their biology and treatment. Studies have demonstrated an improved outcome when these patients are treated with pediatric-inspired regimens. Novel antibody based therapies have demonstrated impressive results in relapsed/refractory B-ALL and are starting to be evaluated in the upfront setting. Immunotherapy with CAR T cells had great success in ALL and clinical trials are ongoing and further studies are being done to expand access to this therapy and decrease toxicities. Although our outcomes with this disease have improved significantly, transplant still plays a role for high risk patients in CR1 (based on MRD status) and for patients with relapsed/refractory ALL.

Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Technical and Clinical Advances

Introduction: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the first neoplasm where the assessment of early response to therapy by minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring has proven to be a fundamental tool to guide therapeutic choices. The most standardized methods to study MRD in ALL are multi-parametric flow cytometry (MFC) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification-based methods. Emerging technologies hold the promise to improve MRD detection in ALL patients. Moreover, novel therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies, bispecific T-cell engagers, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART) represent exciting advancements in the management of B-cell precursor (BCP)-ALL.

Aims: Through a review of the literature and in house data, we analyze the current status of MRD assessment in ALL to better understand how some of its limitations could be overcome by emerging molecular technologies. Furthermore, we highlight the future role of MRD monitoring in the context of personalized protocols, taking into account the genetic complexity in ALL.

Results and Conclusions: Molecular rearrangements (gene fusions and immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor-IG/TR gene rearrangements) are widely used as targets to detect residual leukemic cells in ALL patients. The advent of novel techniques, namely next generation flow cytometry (NGF), digital-droplet-PCR (ddPCR), and next generation sequencing (NGS) appear important tools to evaluate MRD in ALL, since they have the potential to overcome the limitations of standard approaches. It is likely that in the forthcoming future these techniques will be incorporated in clinical trials, at least at decisional time points. Finally, the advent of new powerful compounds is further increasing MRD negativity rates, with benefits in long-term survival and a potential reduction of therapy-related toxicities. However, the prognostic relevance in the setting of novel immunotherapies still needs to be evaluated.

Association of Persistent Minimal Residual Disease with Poor Outcomes of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Background:

Several studies have shown that detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an independent prognostic factor. This study aimed to evaluate the significance of dynamic MRD pretransplantation on outcome of AML patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed 145 consecutive AML patients undergoing allo-HSCT in complete remission status between June 2013 and June 2016. MRD was determined with multiparameter flow cytometry after the first and second courses of chemotherapy and pre-HSCT.

Results:

In matched sibling donor transplantation (MSDT) settings, patients with positive MRD had higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) than those without MRD after the first (32.3 ± 9.7% vs. 7.7 ± 3.1%, χ² = 3.661, P = 0.055) or second course of chemotherapy (57.1 ± 3.6% vs. 12.5 ± 2.7%, χ² = 8.759, P = 0.003) or pre-HSCT (50.0 ± 9.7% vs. 23.0 ± 3.2%, χ² = 5.547, P = 0.019). In haploidentical SCT (haplo-SCT) settings, the MRD status at those timepoints had no significant impact on clinical outcomes. However, patients with persistent positive MRD from chemotherapy to pre-HSCT had higher CIR than those without persistent positive MRD both in MSDT and haplo-SCT settings. Patients with persistent positive MRD underwent MSDT had the highest relapse incidence, followed by those with persistent positive MRD underwent haplo-SCT, those without persistent MRD underwent haplo-SCT, and those without persistent MRD underwent MSDT (66.7 ± 9.2% vs. 38.5 ± 6.0% vs. 18.8 ± 8.7% vs. 12.0 ± 1.0%, χ² = 20.763, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that persistent positive MRD before transplantation was associated with higher CIR (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.200–2.382, P = 0.003), worse leukemia-free survival (HR = 1.812, 95% CI: 1.168–2.812, P = 0.008), and overall survival (HR = 2.354, 95% CI: 1.528–3.627, P < 0.001).

Conclusion:

Our results suggest that persistent positive MRD before transplantation, rather than positive MRD at single timepoint, could predict poor outcome both in MSDT and haplo-SCT settings.

The emerging role of measurable residual disease detection in AML in morphologic remission

Despite the increasing knowledge of the genomic landscape of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), prediction merely based on genetics fails to anticipate outcome, presumably due to the heterogeneous composition of the leukemic clone determining complex interactions between different genetic abnormalities. Therefore, the introduction of a post-treatment biomarker exploring the quality of response to therapy such as assessment of measurable (previously minimal) residual disease (MRD) may lead to refinements of the prognostic assessment in AML. In this view, the European LeukemiaNet has recently endorsed the achievement of a MRD negative morphologic complete remission as a purpose the treatment. Techniques like multiparametric flow cytometry and reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction have reached a level of sensitivity and specificity that make them ready for introduction in clinical practice. In the present review, we will give an update on the efforts in harmonization and/or standardization of MRD assessment in AML, focusing on the newest acquisitions in the clinical applications of MRD, and considering issues like relationship of MRD with leukemic stem cells or MRD assessment in peripheral blood.

The significance of peri-transplantation minimal residual disease assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry on outcomes for adult AML patients receiving haploidentical allografts

A retrospective study (n = 460) was performed to assess the relationship between minimal residual disease (MRD) and transplant outcomes in a haplo-stem cell transplantation (SCT) setting. Patients from the pre-MRDneg group and the pre-MRDpos group had comparable outcomes. Compared to post-MRDneg patients, post-MRDpos patients had a higher incidence of relapse (100.0% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001), lower incidences of overall survival (OS) (16.9% vs. 78.2%, p < 0.001) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) (0% vs. 76.5%, p < 0.001), and comparable probability of NRM (13.4% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.560). In a second set of analyses, all adult AML patients undergoing haplo-SCT were classified into the MRD^neg/MRD^neg group, the MRD decreasing group, and the MRD increasing group according to MRD dynamics by flow cytometry peri-SCT. Compared to the other two groups, patients from the MRD increasing group had higher cumulative incidences of relapse (MRD increasing, 100.0%; MRD^neg/MRD^neg, 9.6%; MRD decreasing, 19.2%; p < 0.001) and worse probabilities of OS (MRD increasing, 28.5%; MRD^neg/MRD^neg, 76.3%; MRD decreasing, 76.0%; p < 0.001) and LFS (MRD increasing, 0.0%; MRD^neg/MRD^neg, 73.9%; MRD decreasing, 74.0%; p < 0.001). The results indicated that haploidentical allografts might have a beneficial anti-leukemia effect in eradicating pretransplantation MRD, and MRD assessment peri-SCT is useful for risk stratification from a practical perspective.

Next-generation sequencing-based posttransplant monitoring of acute myeloid leukemia identifies patients at high risk of relapse

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been applied to define clinically relevant somatic mutations and classify subtypes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Persistent allelic burden after chemotherapy is associated with higher relapse incidence, but presence of allelic burden in AML patients after receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has not been examined longitudinally. As such, we aimed to assess the feasibility of NGS in monitoring AML patients receiving HCT. Using a targeted gene panel, we performed NGS in 104 AML patients receiving HCT using samples collected at diagnosis, pre-HCT, and post-HCT at day 21 (post-HCT^D21). NGS detected 256 mutations in 90 of 104 patients at diagnosis, which showed stepwise clearances after chemotherapy and HCT. In a subset of patients, mutations were still detectable pre-HCT and post-HCT. Most post-HCT mutations originate from mutations initially detected at diagnosis. Post-HCT^D21 allelic burdens in relapsed patients were higher than in nonrelapsed patients. Post-HCT^D21 mutations in relapsed patients all expanded at relapse. Assessment of variant allele frequency (VAF) revealed that overall VAF post-HCT^D21 (VAF^0.2%-post-HCT^D21) is associated with an increased risk of relapse (56.2% vs 16.0% at 3 years; P < .001) and worse overall survival (OS; 36.5% vs 67.0% at 3 years; P = .006). Multivariate analyses confirmed that VAF^0.2%-post-HCT^D21 is an adverse prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.07; P = .003) and relapse incidence (HR, 4.75; P < .001), independent of the revised European LeukemiaNet risk groups. Overall, current study demonstrates that NGS-based posttransplant monitoring in AML patients is feasible and can distinguish high-risk patients for relapse.

Influence of pre-transplant minimal residual disease on prognosis after Allo-SCT for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was performed to explore the impact of minimal residual disease (MRD) prior to transplantation on the prognosis for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted for relevant studies from database inception to March 2016. A total of 21 studies were included.

RESULTS

Patients with positive MRD prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) had a significantly higher rate of relapse compared with those with negative MRD (HR = 3.26; P <  0.05). Pre-transplantation positive MRD was a significant negative predictor of relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR = 2.53; P <  0.05), event-free survival (EFS) (HR = 4.77; P < 0.05), and overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.98; P < 0.05). However, positive MRD prior to transplantation was not associated with a higher rate of nonrelapse mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive MRD before allo-SCT was a predictor of poor prognosis after transplantation in ALL.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

Effects of preemptive interferon-α monotherapy in acute leukemia patients with relapse tendency after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a case-control study

Interferon-α (IFN-α) inhibits tumor growth and mimics graft-versus-leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). In the current case-control study, we compared treatment responses in acute leukemia patients with relapse tendency post-allo-HSCT receiving preemptive IFN-α after withdrawal of immunosuppressants (n = 31) vs. receiving no IFN-α (n = 67). In the IFN-α group, 25 patients responded to the treatment without progressing to hematological relapse. In the non-IFN-α group, only 22 patients responded to the treatment. The response rate differed significantly (80.6 vs. 32.8%, P < 0.001). The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 31.6 and 61.2% in the IFN-α and the non-IFN groups, respectively (P = 0.006). The 2-year leukemia-free survival and overall survival rate was 57.4 vs. 28.4% (P < 0.001) and 67.6 vs. 32.9% (P = 0.001), respectively. Among the 31 patients in the IFN-α group, 18 patients (58.1%) developed graft-versus-host disease (GVHD): 6 acute and 12 limited chronic GVHD. Patients who developed GVHD had higher treatment response rate than patients without GVHD (88.9 vs. 53.8%, P = 0.022). In conclusion, preemptive IFN-α therapy is a safe and effective treatment to prevent disease progression in high-risk patients with relapse tendency post-allo-HSCT.

The Prognostic Significance of Measurable ("Minimal") Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review was to evaluate recent literature on detection methodologies for, and prognostic significance of, measurable ("minimal") residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

RECENT FINDINGS

There is no "one-fits-all" approach to MRD testing in AML. Most exploited to date are methods relying on immunophenotypic aberrancies (identified via multiparameter flow cytometry) or genetic abnormalities (identified via PCR-based assays). Current methods have important shortcomings, including the lack of assay platform standardization/harmonization across laboratories. In parallel to refinements of existing technologies and data analysis/interpretation, new methodologies (e.g., next-generation sequencing-based assays) are emerging that eventually may complement or replace existing ones. This dynamic evolution of MRD testing has complicated comparisons between individual studies. Nonetheless, an ever-growing body of data demonstrates that a positive MRD test at various time points throughout chemotherapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation identifies patients at particularly high risks of disease recurrence and short survival even after adjustment for other risk factors.

Blast Percentage of Bone Marrow Aspirate on Day 14 of Induction Chemotherapy Predicts Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treatment Outcomes

The prognosis of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia is much worse than that of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia, even when patients achieve complete remission. Early response to treatment can be an important alternative indicator of treatment outcomes. The purpose of our current study was to identify the prognostic value of the blast percentage of the induction interim bone marrow, which might predict relapse-free survival and overall survival in patients with adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. A retrospective analysis was performed on 80 adult patients diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia from 1994 to 2011. Complete remission was observed in 75 (93.8%) patients after induction chemotherapy. On multivariate analysis, a reduction of blasts to a level of 5% or less in the induction interim bone marrow and CD20 positivity were significant prognostic predictors of relapse-free survival (hazard ratio, HR = 2.88, p = 0.006, and HR = 2.67, p = 0.010) and overall survival (HR = 2.10, p = 0.033, and HR = 2.39, p = 0.013). The blast percentage of the induction interim bone marrow may be a useful prognostic factor to predict outcome.

Deep NPM1 Sequencing Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Improves Risk Assessment in Adults with NPM1-Mutated AML

Relapse is the major cause of death in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Measurable residual disease (MRD) detected by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) before and after HCT is a strong, independent risk factor for relapse. As next-generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly applied in AML MRD detection, it remains to be determined if NGS can improve prediction of post-HCT relapse. Herein, we investigated pre-HCT MRD detected by MFC and NGS in 59 adult patients with NPM1-mutated AML in morphologic remission; 45 of the 59 had post-HCT MRD determined by MFC and NGS around day 28. Before HCT, MRD detected by MFC was the most significant risk factor for relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 4.63; P < .001), whereas MRD detected only by NGS was not. After HCT, MRD detected by either MFC or NGS was significant risk factor for relapse (HR, 4.96, P = .004 and HR, 4.36, P = .002, respectively). Combining pre- and post-HCT MRD provided the best prediction for relapse (HR, 5.25; P < .001), with a sensitivity at 83%. We conclude that NGS testing of mutated NPM1 post-HCT improves the risk assessment for relapse, whereas pre-HCT MFC testing identifies a subset of high-risk patients in whom additional therapy should be tested.

The assessment and appraisal of regenerative medicines and cell therapy products: an exploration of methods for review, economic evaluation and appraisal

BACKGROUND

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) commissioned a 'mock technology appraisal' to assess whether changes to its methods and processes are needed. This report presents the findings of independent research commissioned to inform this appraisal and the deliberations of a panel convened by NICE to evaluate the mock appraisal.

METHODS

Our research included reviews to identify issues, analysis methods and conceptual differences and the relevance of alternative decision frameworks, alongside the development of an exemplar case study of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for treating acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

RESULTS

An assessment of previous evaluations of regenerative medicines found that, although there were a number of evidential challenges, none was unique to regenerative medicines or was beyond the scope of existing methods used to conceptualise decision uncertainty. Regarding the clinical evidence for regenerative medicines, the issues were those associated with a limited evidence base but were not unique to regenerative medicines: small non-randomised studies, high variation in response and the intervention subject to continuing development. The relative treatment effects generated from single-arm trials are likely to be optimistic unless it is certain that the historical data have accurately estimated the efficacy of the control agent. Pivotal trials may use surrogate end points, which, on average, overestimate treatment effects. To reduce overall uncertainty, multivariate meta-analysis of all available data should be considered. Incorporating indirectly relevant but more reliable (more mature) data into the analysis can also be considered; such data may become available as a result of the evolving regulatory pathways being developed by the European Medicines Agency. For the exemplar case of CAR T-cell therapy, target product profiles (TPPs) were developed, which considered the 'curative' and 'bridging to stem-cell transplantation' treatment approaches separately. Within each TPP, three 'hypothetical' evidence sets (minimum, intermediate and mature) were generated to simulate the impact of alternative levels of precision and maturity in the clinical evidence. Subsequent assessments of cost-effectiveness were undertaken, employing the existing NICE reference case alongside additional analyses suggested within alternative frameworks. The additional exploratory analyses were undertaken to demonstrate how assessments of cost-effectiveness and uncertainty could be impacted by alternative managed entry agreements (MEAs), including price discounts, performance-related schemes and technology leasing. The panel deliberated on the range of TPPs, evidence sets and MEAs, commenting on the likely recommendations for each scenario. The panel discussed the challenges associated with the exemplar and regenerative medicines more broadly, focusing on the need for a robust quantification of the level of uncertainty in the cost-effective estimates and the potential value of MEAs in limiting the exposure of the NHS to high upfront costs and loss associated with a wrong decision.

CONCLUSIONS

It is to be expected that there will be a significant level of uncertainty in determining the clinical effectiveness of regenerative medicines and their long-term costs and benefits, but the existing methods available to estimate the implications of this uncertainty are sufficient. The use of risk sharing and MEAs between the NHS and manufacturers of regenerative medicines should be investigated further.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Genomic CDKN2A/2B deletions in adult Ph+ ALL are adverse despite allogeneic stem cell transplantation

We investigated the role of copy number alterations to refine risk stratification in adult Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph)⁺ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (aSCT). Ninety-seven Ph⁺ ALL patients (median age 41 years; range 18-64 years) within the prospective multicenter German Multicenter ALL Study Group studies 06/99 (n = 8) and 07/2003 (n = 89) were analyzed. All patients received TKI and aSCT in first complete remission (CR1). Copy number analysis was performed with single nucleotide polymorphism arrays and validated by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. The frequencies of recurrently deleted genes were: IKZF1, 76%; CDKN2A/2B, 45%; PAX5, 43%; BTG1, 18%; EBF1, 13%; ETV6, 5%; RB, 14%. In univariate analyses, the presence of CDKN2A/2B deletions had a negative impact on all endpoints: overall survival (P = .023), disease-free survival (P = .012), and remission duration (P = .036). The negative predictive value of CDKN2A/2B deletions was retained in multivariable analysis along with other factors such as timing of TKI therapy, intensity of conditioning, achieving remission after induction phase 1 and BTG1 deletions. We therefore conclude that acquired genomic CDKN2A/2B deletions identify a subgroup of Ph⁺ ALL patients, who have an inferior prognosis despite aSCT in CR1. Their poor outcome was attributable primarily to a high relapse rate after aSCT.

Unrelated matched versus autologous transplantation in adult patients with good and intermediate risk acute myelogenous leukemia in first molecular remission

Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia have a better outcome if reaching molecular remission. We compared the outcome of 373 patients autografted and 335 patients allografted with a 10/10 compatible unrelated donor in first molecular remission. Patients were stratified using the ELN European Leukemia Net classification. ELN favorable group: (234 auto and 70 unrelated transplants). By univariate analysis, in the auto group, the Non Relapse Mortality (NRM) was lower (3.7% versus 19%; P < 10^-4 ), Relapse Incidence (RI) higher (29% versus 17%, P < 10^-4 ), Leukemia Free Survival (LFS) identical (67% versus 64%) and Overall Survival (OS) better than in the allogeneic group (83% versus 62%; P = .008). By multivariate analysis, autologous transplantation was associated with a lower NRM (HR: 4, P = .01) and a better OS (HR: 2.08, P = .04). ELN intermediate group 1: (87 autologous and 172 unrelated transplants). By univariate analysis, in the auto group, NRM was lower (2.5% versus 11.8%; P = .03), RI higher (59% versus 18%, P < 10^-6 ), LFS lower (39% versus 70%; P < 10^-6 ) and OS lower than in the unrelated donor group (61% versus 74%; P = .005). By multivariate analysis, unrelated donor was superior to autologous transplantation for LFS (HR: 0.36, P < 10^-5) and OS (HR: 0.53, P = .01). ELN intermediate group 2: (52 autologous and 93 unrelated donors). The outcome was identical. We conclude that good risk patients get higher benefit from autologous transplantation. Intermediate risk 2 patients have the same outcome and Intermediate risk 1 patients get higher benefit from unrelated donor transplants.

Relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Is it crucial to achieve molecular remission prior to transplant?

In patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) the risk of recurrent leukemia influences the choice of treatment between chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. The evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) is now considered to be the greatest progress in risk stratification in regard to leukemia recurrence. Achieving molecular remission at the end of induction therapy after diagnosis or after relapse has influenced treatment choice. Failure to achieve molecular remission is considered "high risk" and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with a suitable donor, the accepted standard. Nevertheless, published reports support lower relapse and higher survival rates for those in molecular remission at transplantation compared to those in morphological remission. In the setting of relapsed ALL, the availability of targeted therapies offers an opportunity for molecular remission so that transplant recipients have the best possible option of attaining sustained remission upon completion of this treatment.

Should patients with acute myeloid leukemia and measurable residual disease be transplanted in first complete remission?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Measurable ('minimal') residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia during first complete morphologic remission (MRD CR1) identifies patients with particularly high relapse risk and short survival. Here, we examine the evidence regarding optimal postremission treatment strategy for such patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

With chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy/autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), disease recurrence appears inevitable in patients with MRD CR1. Nonrandomized studies indicate that allogeneic HCT improves outcomes over chemotherapy and/or autologous HCT, although relapse risks remain substantial. Emerging data suggest that myeloablative cord blood HCT may overcome the negative impact of MRD to a greater degree than other transplants, but the relative contributions of intensified conditioning and stem cell source to this effect are unknown.

SUMMARY

Available evidence supports the recommendation to consider allogeneic HCT for all acute myeloid leukemia patients in MRD CR1. Whether cord blood transplants should be prioritized deserves further investigation. To what degree outcomes of MRD CR1 patients could be improved by treatment intensification during induction, postremission therapy and/or before transplantation to revert the patient into an MRD state is currently unknown, as is the value of post-transplant preemptive therapies. These remain areas worthy of investigation, preferably in the setting of controlled clinical trials.

High-throughput sequencing for noninvasive disease detection in hematologic malignancies

Noninvasive monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) has led to significant advances in personalized management of patients with hematologic malignancies. Improved therapeutic options and prolonged survival have further increased the need for sensitive tumor assessment that can inform treatment decisions and patient outcomes. At diagnosis or relapse of most hematologic neoplasms, malignant cells are often easily accessible in the blood as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), making them ideal targets to noninvasively profile the molecular features of each patient. In other cancer types, CTCs are generally rare and noninvasive molecular detection relies on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) shed from tumor deposits into circulation. The ability to precisely detect and quantify CTCs and ctDNA could minimize invasive procedures and improve prediction of clinical outcomes. Technical advances in MRD detection methods in recent years have led to reduced costs and increased sensitivity, specificity, and applicability. Among currently available tests, high-throughput sequencing (HTS)-based approaches are increasingly attractive for noninvasive molecular testing. HTS-based methods can simultaneously identify multiple genetic markers with high sensitivity and specificity without individual optimization. In this review, we present an overview of techniques used for noninvasive molecular disease detection in selected myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms, with a focus on the current and future role of HTS-based assays.

Comparison of Autologous and Unrelated Transplants for Cytogenetically Normal Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) from an HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD) is a postremission treatment that offers a potential cure for adults with cytogenetically normal (CN) acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1). The best alternative in the absence of an MSD remains unclear, however. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the outcomes of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (auto-PBSCT; n = 177) and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from an HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD; n = 173) in adult patients with CN-AML/CR1. Both the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 1.97; P = .53) and propensity score models (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.80 to 2.43; P = .24) indicated that the leukemia-free survival (LFS) rate of auto-PBSCT was not significantly different from that of MUD-BMT. These results suggest that in the absence of an available MSD, auto-PBSCT remains a viable alternative as postremission therapy in patients with CN-AML/CR1.

Measurable residual disease testing in acute myeloid leukaemia

There is considerable interest in developing techniques to detect and/or quantify remaining leukaemia cells termed measurable or, less precisely, minimal residual disease (MRD) in persons with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in complete remission defined by cytomorphological criteria. An important reason for AML MRD-testing is the possibility of estimating the likelihood (and timing) of leukaemia relapse. A perfect MRD-test would precisely quantify leukaemia cells biologically able and likely to cause leukaemia relapse within a defined interval. AML is genetically diverse and there is currently no uniform approach to detecting such cells. Several technologies focused on immune phenotype or cytogenetic and/or molecular abnormalities have been developed, each with advantages and disadvantages. Many studies report a positive MRD-test at diverse time points during AML therapy identifies persons with a higher risk of leukaemia relapse compared with those with a negative MRD-test even after adjusting for other prognostic and predictive variables. No MRD-test in AML has perfect sensitivity and specificity for relapse prediction at the cohort- or subject levels and there are substantial rates of false-positive and -negative tests. Despite these limitations, correlations between MRD-test results and relapse risk have generated interest in MRD-test result-directed therapy interventions. However, convincing proof that a specific intervention will reduce relapse risk in persons with a positive MRD-test is lacking and needs testing in randomized trials. Routine clinical use of MRD-testing requires further refinements and standardization/harmonization of assay platforms and results reporting. Such data are needed to determine whether results of MRD-testing can be used as a surrogate end point in AML therapy trials. This could make drug-testing more efficient and accelerate regulatory approvals. Although MRD-testing in AML has advanced substantially, much remains to be done.