Large scale studies assessing anti-factor VIII antibody development in previously untreated haemophilia A: what has been learned, what to believe and how to learn more

Unearthing the genotype-inhibitor phenotype association in severe haemophilia A: A north Indian cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Various risk factors for inhibitor development in haemophilia A (HA) have been described but Indian data remains scanty.

AIM

We aimed to evaluate the genetic changes in Indian HA-patients that are associated with the development of inhibitors.

METHODS

All HA-patients with inhibitors who availed coagulation-laboratory services from January-2015 till December-2021 and had their samples preserved for DNA extraction were included in this study. An equal number of severity-matched HA patients without inhibitors were also included as controls. Intron 22 and intron 1 inversions in Factor VIII gene were identified using inverse-shifting-PCR. Inversion-negative patients were further assessed by targeted NGS, MLPA.

RESULTS

Thirty HA-patients with inhibitors were identified. All had severe-HA. Thirty severe-HA-patients without inhibitors were also included as controls. Intron 22 inversion (63.3%) and large deletions (15%) were the commonest variants identified. There was no difference in genetic variants in patients with low and high titre inhibitors. A3, A2 and C2 were the most common domains involved in inversion-negative patients with inhibitors. However, there was no significant difference in domain involvement among inversion-negative patients with and without inhibitors. Seven novel-variants were identified, including three large deletions, one large duplication and two nonsense variants in inhibitor-positive patients, and one frameshift variant in inhibitor-negative patient. After adjusting for clinical risk-factors, large deletions were independently associated with the presence of inhibitors [aOR:6.1 (1.41-56.3)].

CONCLUSION

Intron 22 inversions are the commonest variant in Indian patients with severe-HA. Large deletions predispose to inhibitor development independent of clinical risk factors.

Factor IX inhibitors in haemophilia B: A report of National Haemophilia Registry in China

INTRODUCTION

The development of inhibitors against factor FIX (FIX) is the most serious complication of FIX replacement therapy in haemophilia B (HB) patients. Currently, only few cohorts of HB inhibitor patients have been reported worldwide.

AIM

This Chinese nationwide study of HB inhibitor patients explored their risk factors for FIX inhibitor development and experience on their management.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed patient characteristics, F9 genotypes, treatment strategies and outcomes of HB inhibitor patients registered to the Chinese National Registry and Patient Organization Registry.

RESULTS

Forty-four unique HB inhibitor patients were identified in 4485 unique HB patients registered by year 2021 to the two Registries. Inhibitor diagnosis were usually delayed and the low prevalence (.98%) may suggest some inhibitor patients were not identified. Their median age at inhibitor diagnosis was 7.5 (IQR, 3.0-14.8) years. Most patients (95.5%) had high-titre inhibitors. Allergic/Anaphylactic reactions occurred in 59.1% patients. Large deletions and nonsense mutations were the most common F9 mutation types in our FIX inhibitor patients. Patients with large F9 gene deletions were more likely to develop inhibitors (p = .0002), while those with missense mutations had a low risk (p < .0001). Thirteen (29.5%) patients received immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy using low-dose prothrombin complex concentrate regimens. Twelve completed ITI with three (25.0%) achieving success. Nephrotic syndrome developed in two (16.7%) patients during ITI.

CONCLUSION

This study reports the largest Chinese cohort of HB inhibitor patients. Large deletions were most significantly associated with inhibitor development. Low-dose ITI might be feasible for FIX inhibitor eradication.

Patients with haemophilia A with inhibitors in China: a national real-world analysis and follow-up

The development of alloantibodies (inhibitors) against coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) is the most serious complication of FVIII replacement therapy in patients with haemophilia A (HA). We carried out a nationwide study focussing on patients with HA with inhibitors in China to evaluate the condition and management of this population. The study retrospectively analysed patient characteristics, clinical history, manifestation, treatment strategy as well as individual haemophilia care of 493 patients with inhibitors (466 with severe HA and 27 with non-severe HA) registered all over China. The median (interquartile range) age at diagnosis of FVIII inhibitors was 13 (5-28) years in patients with severe HA and 24 (10·5-39·5) years in patients with non-severe HA. Most patients (85%) had high-titre inhibitors. Prothrombin complex concentrate and recombinant activated coagulation factor VII were used respectively in 76·2% and 29·2% of patients for acute bleeding. Only 22·3% of patients underwent immune tolerance induction (ITI) treatment, of whom 64·9% achieved negative inhibitor titre. In patients who did not undergo ITI, the inhibitors turned negative in 17·7%, and patients with low peak inhibitor titre were more likely to acquire negative titre spontaneously (odds ratio 11·524, 95% confidence interval 5·222-25·432; P = 0·000). We recorded that 3·2% of the patients died from haemophilia-related life-threatening bleeding.

Inhibitor development in previously untreated patients with severe haemophilia: A comparison of included patients and outcomes between a clinical study and a registry-based study

Aim

The aim of this study was to investigate whether a disease registry could serve as a suitable alternative to clinical studies to investigate safety of orphan drugs in children.

Methods

We used individual patient data from previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe haemophilia A from the factor VIII (rAHF‐PFM)‐clinical study and the PedNet registry. The primary outcome was the patient characteristics at entry and the difference in inhibitor development between the clinical study and the registry‐based study at 50 exposure days.

Results

Clinical study patients more often had a positive family history of inhibitors (31% vs 10%) and a high‐risk F8 genotype (82% vs 63%). In the clinical study 41/55 (75%) and in the registry‐based study 162/168 (96%) patients reached 50 exposure days. Inhibitors developed in 16 of the 41 patients in the clinical study (39%) vs 44 of the 162 patients in the registry‐based study (27%); seven patients (7%) vs 28 patients (17%) had high‐titre inhibitors. The risk of developing an inhibitor during the first 50 exposure days was similar (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.56‐1.94), when adjusted for family history of inhibitors, F8 gene mutation and intensive treatment at first exposure.

Conclusion

In the registry‐based study, patient numbers and completeness of follow‐up were higher. The risk of developing an inhibitor to a single product was comparable. Although the sample size of this study was too small to conclude on differences in high‐ or low‐titre inhibitors, this suggests that a registry could serve as a more suitable source for evaluation of high‐titre inhibitors in the setting of factor VIII deficiency.

octanate®: over 20 years of clinical experience in overcoming challenges in haemophilia A treatment

Treatment of haemophilia A with FVIII replacement has evolved over the past decades to adapt to the needs of patients. octanate®, a plasma-derived, double virus-inactivated, von Willebrand factor (VWF)-containing FVIII concentrate, has been used in clinics worldwide for over 20 years. First licensed in 1998 in Germany, octanate® is approved in over 80 countries for the prevention and treatment of bleeding and for surgical prophylaxis in patients with haemophilia A, and in over 40 countries for immune tolerance induction (ITI). The manufacturing process for octanate® was developed to ensure high viral safety and effectively eliminates both enveloped and nonenveloped viruses. Over the past 20 years, the excellent safety and efficacy of octanate® have been demonstrated in pivotal clinical trials in adult and paediatric previously treated patients (PTPs) for on-demand treatment, prophylaxis and as surgical cover. Importantly, octanate® has displayed low immunogenicity in previously untreated patients (PUPs), with only 9.8% of PUPs developing FVIII inhibitors. octanate® has also shown to be highly effective in inhibitor elimination when used as ITI therapy. In a population of patients with high risk of ITI failure, success was achieved in 79.2% of patients (70.8% complete success), even when using exceptionally stringent success criteria. No relapses were observed. Here we present an overview of the clinical data with octanate® that support its use in a range of patient populations and clinical indications.

An evaluation of the safety and efficacy of turoctocog alfa for hemophilia A

Introduction: Hemophilia A is an inherited disorder that is characterized by decreased or absent factor (F)VIII and an increased risk of bleeding. Clinical presentation of the severe form of the disease includes spontaneous bleeding into the joints and muscles, while patients with milder forms usually exhibit trauma-associated bleeding. The treatment of hemophilia aims to prevent bleeding. A number of clotting FVIII concentrates are available for managing hemophilia A, which have different safety and efficacy characteristics. Advancements in biotechnology have enabled development of recombinant factor concentrates, which thus minimize the risk of transmitting infectious diseases. Turoctocog alfa (NovoEight®, Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) was the first third-generation B-domain truncated recombinant FVIII.Areas covered: The manuscript describes the characteristics of turoctocog alfa, as well as its efficacy and safety for prophylaxis and on-demand treatment for patients with severe hemophilia A without inhibitors.Expert opinion: In clinical trials, turoctocog alfa has demonstrated very good efficacy and safety for the prophylaxis and on-demand treatment of hemophilia A patients, as well as high hemostatic activity during surgery and in managing bleeding episodes. Post-marketing studies and real-life data are anticipated to further reinforce the value of long-term prophylaxis, and estimate the incidence of inhibitors to FVIII.

Quantitative HLA-class-II/factor VIII (FVIII) peptidomic variation in dendritic cells correlates with the immunogenic potential of therapeutic FVIII proteins in hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Plasma-derived (pd) or recombinant (r) therapeutic factor VIII proteins (FVIIIs) are infused to arrest/prevent bleeding in patients with hemophilia A (PWHA). However, FVIIIs are neutralized if anti-FVIII-antibodies (inhibitors) develop. Accumulating evidence suggests that pdFVIIIs with von Willebrand factor (VWF) are less immunogenic than rFVIIIs and that distinct rFVIIIs are differentially immunogenic. Since inhibitor development is T-helper-cell-dependent, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-class-II (HLAcII) molecules constitute an important early determinant.

OBJECTIVES

Use dendritic cell (DC)-protein processing/presentation assays with mass-spectrometric and peptide-proteomic analyses to quantify the DP-bound, DQ-bound, and DR-bound FVIII-derived peptides in individual HLAcII repertoires and compare the immunogenic potential of six distinct FVIIIs based on their measured peptide counts.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Monocyte-derived DCs from normal donors and/or PWHA were cultured with either: Mix-rFVIII, a VWF-free equimolar mixture of a full-length (FL)-rFVIII [Advate® (Takeda)] and four distinct B-domain-deleted (BDD)-rFVIIIs [Xyntha® (Pfizer), NovoEight® (Novo-Nordisk), Nuwiq® (Octapharma), and Afstyla® (CSL Behring GmBH)]; a pdFVIII + pdVWF [Beriate® (CSL Behring GmBH)]; Advate ± pdVWF; Afstyla ± pdVWF; and Xyntha + pdVWF.

RESULTS

We showed that (i) Beriate had a significantly lower immunogenic potential than Advate ± pdVWF, Afstyla - pdVWF, and Mix-rFVIII; (ii) distinct FVIIIs differed significantly in their immunogenic potential in that, in addition to (i), Afstyla + pdVWF had a significantly lower immunogenic potential than Beriate, while the immunogenic potential of Beriate was not significantly different from that of Xyntha + pdVWF; and (iii) rFVIIIs with pdVWF had significantly lower immunogenic potentials than the same rFVIIIs without pdVWF.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide HLAcII peptidomic level explanations for several important clinical observations/issues including the differential immunogenicity of distinct FVIIIs and the role of HLAcII genetics in inhibitor development.

TCPro: an In Silico Risk Assessment Tool for Biotherapeutic Protein Immunogenicity

Most immune responses to biotherapeutic proteins involve the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). New drugs must undergo immunogenicity assessments to identify potential risks at early stages in the drug development process. This immune response is T cell-dependent. Ex vivo assays that monitor T cell proliferation often are used to assess immunogenicity risk. Such assays can be expensive and time-consuming to carry out. Furthermore, T cell proliferation requires presentation of the immunogenic epitope by major histocompatibility complex class II (MHCII) proteins on antigen-presenting cells. The MHC proteins are the most diverse in the human genome. Thus, obtaining cells from subjects that reflect the distribution of the different MHCII proteins in the human population can be challenging. The allelic frequencies of MHCII proteins differ among subpopulations, and understanding the potential immunogenicity risks would thus require generation of datasets for specific subpopulations involving complex subject recruitment. We developed TCPro, a computational tool that predicts the temporal dynamics of T cell counts in common ex vivo assays for drug immunogenicity. Using TCPro, we can test virtual pools of subjects based on MHCII frequencies and estimate immunogenicity risks for different populations. It also provides rapid and inexpensive initial screens for new biotherapeutics and can be used to determine the potential immunogenicity risk of new sequences introduced while bioengineering proteins. We validated TCPro using an experimental immunogenicity dataset, making predictions on the population-based immunogenicity risk of 15 protein-based biotherapeutics. Immunogenicity rankings generated using TCPro are consistent with the reported clinical experience with these therapeutics.