Cancer risk following post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders in solid organ transplant recipients

Immunosuppression and cancer risk in kidney transplant recipients: A retrospective cohort study

We assessed whether contemporary immunosuppression agents were associated with cancer among kidney transplant recipients (KTR), and if this association varied by age and sex. We studied a retrospective province-wide cohort of primary KTR (1997-2016). Employing multivariable Cox models, we estimated associations of cumulative doses of prednisone, mycophenolate and tacrolimus administered over the past 10 years, lagged by 2 years, with the incidence of primary malignant neoplasms (PMN). We assessed interactions with age and sex. To assess the impact of exposure recency, we used weighted cumulative exposure (WCE) modeling. Among 1064 KTR, 108 (10.2%) developed PMN over median follow-up of 73 months (interquartile range: 32-120). Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 0.96 (0.64-1.43), 1.34 (0.96-1.86), and 1.06 (0.88-1.29) were estimated for cumulative daily doses of prednisone (5 mg), mycophenolate (1000 mg), and tacrolimus (2 mg) administered continuously over the past 10 years, respectively. PMN risk associated with cumulative tacrolimus exposure was modified by age (interaction p = .035) and was more pronounced in 15-year and 30-year-old KTR (aHRs of 1.57 [1.08-2.28] and 1.31 [1.03-1.66], respectively) in comparison to older KTR. PMN risk increase associated with higher cumulative mycophenolate dose was more pronounced in females (aHR = 1.86 [1.15-3.00]) than in males (aHR = 1.16 [0.74-1.81]; interaction p = .131). WCE analyses suggested increased PMN risk the higher the mycophenolate doses taken 5-10 years ago. A trend toward increased PMN risk with long-term mycophenolate exposure, particularly in females, and more pronounced risk with long-term tacrolimus exposure in younger KTR, identify opportunities for tailored immunosuppression to mitigate cancer risk.

Nonresolving Axillary Lymphadenopathy: An Unexpected Case of Metastatic Jejunal Adenocarcinoma in a Small-Bowel Transplant Recipient Masquerading as Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder

Intestinal transplant is an uncommon treatment of intestinal failure that has provided many patients with reduced morbidity and mortality. However, there are associated risks, including an increased risk of cancer, such as posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder and solid-organ malignancy. Here, we report a unique case of primary jejunal adenocarcinoma presenting initially only with axillary lymphadenopathy in a patient with recurrent posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder after multiple solid-organ transplants, including small intestine and 2 renal transplants.

Post-transplant malignancies in pediatric organ transplant recipients

The majority of cancer diagnoses in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) or skin cancers. However, pediatric SOTRs are also at significantly elevated risk for multiple other solid and hematological cancers. The risks of specific cancers vary by transplanted organ, underlying disease, and immunosuppression factors. More than one-quarter of pediatric SOTRs develop cancer within 30 years of transplantation and their risk of solid cancer is 14 times greater than the general population. Pediatric SOTRs are at significantly higher risk of cancer-associated death. Improving patient survival among pediatric SOTRs puts them at risk of adult epithelial cancers associated with environmental carcinogenic exposures. Vaccination against oncogenic viruses and avoidance of excessive immunosuppression may reduce the risk of solid cancers following transplantation. Patient and family education regarding photoprotection is an essential component of skin cancer prevention. There is significant variability in cancer screening recommendations for SOTRs and general population approaches are typically not validated for transplant populations. An individualized approach to cancer screening should be developed based on estimated cancer risk, patient life expectancy, and screening test performance.