Clinical features, laboratory characteristics and outcomes of patients with renal versus cardiac light chain amyloidosis

Clinical characterization and outcomes of a cohort of colombian patients with AL Amyloidosis

Background

Amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis is characterized by amyloid fibril deposition derived from monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains, resulting in multiorgan dysfunction. Limited data exist on the clinical features of AL amyloidosis.

Objective

This study aims to describe the clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes in Colombian patients with AL amyloidosis.

Methods

A retrospective descriptive study was conducted at three high-complexity centers in Medellín, Colombia. Adults with AL amyloidosis diagnosed between 2012 and 2022 were included. Clinical, laboratory, histological, treatment, and survival data were analyzed.

Results

The study included 63 patients. Renal involvement was most prevalent (66%), followed by cardiac involvement (61%). Multiorgan involvement occurred in 61% of patients. Amyloid deposition was most commonly detected in renal biopsy (40%). Bortezomib-based therapy was used in 68%, and 23.8% received high-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HDCT-ASCT). Hematological response was observed in 95% of patients with available data. Cardiac and renal organ responses were 15% and 14%, respectively. Median overall survival was 45.1 months (95% CI: 22.2-63.8). In multivariate analysis, cardiac involvement was significantly associated with inferior overall survival (HR 3.27; 95% CI: 1.23-8.73; p=0.018), HDCT-ASCT had a non-significant trend towards improved overall survival (HR 0.25; 95% CI: 0.06-1.09; p=0.065).

Conclusions

In this study of Colombian patients with AL amyloidosis, renal involvement was more frequent than cardiac involvement. Overall survival and multiorgan involvement were consistent with data from other regions of the world. Multivariate analysis identified cardiac involvement and HDCT-AHCT as possible prognostic factors.

The characteristics of patients with kidney light chain deposition disease concurrent with light chain amyloidosis

The type of monoclonal light chain nephropathy is thought to be largely a function of the structural and physiochemical properties of light chains; hence most affected patients have only one light chain kidney disease type. Here, we report the first series of kidney light chain deposition disease (LCDD) concomitant with light chain amyloidosis (LCDD+AL), with or without light chain cast nephropathy (LCCN). Our LCDD+AL cohort consisted of 37 patients (54% females, median age 70 years (range 40-86)). All cases showed Congo red-positive amyloid deposits staining for one light chain isotype on immunofluorescence (62% lambda), and LCDD with diffuse linear staining of glomerular and tubular basement membranes for one light chain isotype (97% same isotype as the amyloidogenic light chain) and ultrastructural non-fibrillar punctate deposits. Twelve of 37 cases (about 1/3 of patients) had concomitant LCCN of same light chain isotype. Proteomic analysis of amyloid and/or LCDD deposits in eight revealed a single light chain variable domain mutable subgroup in all cases (including three with separate microdissections of LCDD and amyloid light chain deposits). Clinical data on 21 patients showed proteinuria (100%), hematuria (75%), kidney insufficiency and nephrotic syndrome (55%). Extra-kidney involvement was present in 43% of the patients. Multiple myeloma occurred in 68% (about 2/3) of these patients; none had lymphoma. On follow up (median 16 months), 63% developed kidney failure and 56% died. The median kidney and patient survivals were 12 and 32 months, respectively. LCDD+AL mainly affected patients 60 years of age or older. Thus, LCDD+AL could be caused by two pathological light chains produced by subclones stemming from one immunoglobulin light chain lambda or kappa rearrangement, with a distinct mutated complementary determining region.

A real-world study on diagnosis and prognosis of light-chain cardiac amyloidosis in Southern China

Background

Light-chain cardiac amyloidosis (AL-CA) has been highly valued in developed countries, but in developing countries, the recognition and diagnosis of this condition is still limited. There are currently few reports on a large number of Chinese patients with AL-CA. The present study aimed to report real-world clinical characteristics and prognosis of AL-CA in China.

Methods and results

Consecutive patients with AL-CA diagnosed at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University between June 2012 and September 2020 were reviewed. A total of 170 patients with AL-CA have been recruited, whose mean ages were 60.81 ± 10.46. 70.59% of the patients were male. They were from eight provinces in southern China, 55.7% were referred patients, and 37.3% had been misdiagnosed previously. 64 (37.6%) patients received chemotherapy. The median survival time for patients with AL-CA was 8.00 months, and survival time for patients who received chemotherapy was 13.00 months, which was significantly longer than that of patients with palliative treatment (13.00 vs 6.00, p = 0.004).

Conclusions

Although clinicians have improved their understanding of AL-CA in recent years, the prognosis of AL-CA is still poor, and the misdiagnosis rate and missed diagnosis rate are still very high in China. It is imperative to improve the recognition and early diagnosis of this condition, which may require multidisciplinary collaboration among cardiologists, hematologists and nephrologists.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-021-02256-3.

Impact of time to diagnosis on Mayo stages, treatment outcome, and survival in patients with AL amyloidosis and cardiac involvement

OBJECTIVE

To study the impact of time to diagnosis on cardiac Mayo stages, treatment outcome, and overall survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 77 consecutive patients diagnosed between 2015 and 2020 with AL amyloidosis and cardiac involvement. Medical history was recorded in standardized form with the help of a questionnaire.

RESULTS

Time from onset of symptoms of cardiac failure to diagnosis was correlated with the severity of cardiac involvement in modified Mayo 2004 and revised Mayo 2012 staging systems (r_s  = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.07-0.50, P = .007 and r_s  = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.01-0.45, P = .03). Patients with advanced Mayo 2004 stages received reduced-intensity regimens and had a lower probability to achieve adequate hematologic- and cardiac response after first-line treatment than patients with early stages (r_s  = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.04-0.48, P = .01 and r_s  = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55-0.82, P < .0001) and poorer overall survival (P = .0004). Compared with patients diagnosed within the first year, patients diagnosed after 13-18 or ≥19 months from first symptoms had a 3- to 5 times higher risk of dying. Our data indicate that there is a 12-month window within which the diagnosis of AL amyloidosis needs to be established to avoid early deterioration and death.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensitizing physicians and raising awareness for the disease are crucial for timely diagnosis and may improve the outcome of the disease.

Renal Involvement in Systemic Amyloidosis Caused by Monoclonal Immunoglobulins

Kidney involvement in immunoglobulin-related amyloidosis (AIg) is common. Although patients with renal-limited AIg tend not to have the high mortality that patients with cardiac amyloidosis have, they do experience significant morbidity and impact on quality of life. The complexity of the pathogenesis remains incompletely understood. Models have been established to prognosticate and assess for the response to therapy. Patients with advanced renal impairment from immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis still have poor renal prognosis, and better therapy is needed in order to preserve kidney function. Patients who develop end-stage renal disease can undergo renal replacement therapy with kidney transplantation.

A study from The Mayo Clinic evaluated long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation in patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis

Longer survival using modern therapies has increased the number of patients with immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis receiving kidney transplantation. We evaluated 60 patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis who underwent kidney transplantation based on their hematologic response for outcomes of death, graft failure, and complications. Patient hematologic responses (light-chain in blood or urine) prior to kidney transplantation were three patients had no response, five had a partial response, six had a very good partial response, 37 had a complete response, and nine were treatment-naive patients (never treated for this disorder). After transplantation, seven of nine treatment-naive patients achieved a complete response. The median follow-up for the entire transplant cohort was 61 months. The estimated median overall survival from the time of kidney transplantation was 123 months for the entire group. Median overall survival was not reached for the very good partial response plus complete response groups, it was 47 months for no response plus partial response groups, and 117 months for the treatment-naive group (all significantly different). Median overall survival of very good partial response was 81 months, while the median was not reached in the complete response group (no significant difference). The time to amyloid recurrence was significantly longer in complete response compared to very good partial response (median 181 vs 81 months). Death-censored graft survival at one- and five-years was 98.3%, and 95.8%, respectively for all groups. Of the 60 patients, three had allograft failure, 19 died with a functioning graft, and 13 had an amyloid recurrence. Thus, outcomes after kidney transplant in patients with immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis seem acceptable if a very good partial response or complete response is achieved either before or after transplantation.

Challenges in the management of patients with systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis during the COVID-19 pandemic

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2)‐associated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is primarily manifested as a respiratory tract infection, but may affect and cause complications in multiple organ systems (cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, kidneys, haematopoietic and immune systems), while no proven specific therapy exists. The challenges associated with COVID‐19 are even greater for patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis, a rare multisystemic disease affecting the heart, kidneys, liver, gastrointestinal and nervous system. Patients with AL amyloidosis may need to receive chemotherapy, which probably increases infection risk. Management of COVID‐19 may be particularly challenging in patients with AL amyloidosis, who often present with cardiac dysfunction, nephrotic syndrome, neuropathy, low blood pressure and gastrointestinal symptoms. In addition, patients with AL amyloidosis may be more susceptible to toxicities of drugs used to manage COVID‐19. Access to health care may be difficult or limited, diagnosis of AL amyloidosis may be delayed with detrimental consequences and treatment administration may need modification. Both patients and treating physicians need to adapt in a new reality.

Prognosis and Staging of AL Amyloidosis

The treatment options for systemic light chain amyloidosis (AL) are currently widening in an unprecedented way, brought about by an expanding arsenal of anti-myeloma therapy as well as by novel approaches to target toxic light chains and, most recently, deposited amyloid directly. In this context, accurate estimates of prognosis in AL, which allow for reliable patient advice and for example comparison of different therapies, are particularly important to clinicians. Some biomarkers and especially the genetic background of the underlying clonal disease as evaluated by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization even have predictive value, enabling an appropriate treatment selection. Derived from the most frequently involved organs in AL, heart and kidney, this review focuses on overall survival and renal survival. A comprehensive overview and summary of reported prognostic factors and biomarkers in AL is given and the most important and validated factors are highlighted. Finally, established staging systems in AL as well as validated and perspective response criteria are presented.

[The prognostic value of baseline serum free light chain in immunoglobulin light-chain cardiac amyloidosis]

Objective: To analyze the prognostic value of baseline serum free light chain (sFLC) in immunoglobulin light-chain cardiac amyloidosis (AL-CA) . Methods: Thirty patients diagnosed with AL-CA from January 2012 to December 2016 at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital were included in this study to retrospectively evaluate the clinical data. The cut-off value of dFLC (involved sFLC minus uninvolved sFLC) was determined according to the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) and grouped, the prognoses of both groups were evaluated. Results: The onset age of all AL-CA patients was 57 years old. It occurred more commonly in men (21 cases, 70%) and the light chains of immunoglobulin composed mainly of type λ (22 cases, 73.3%) . Renal involvements occurred in 17 cases (56.7%) . The median value of difference between involved and uninvolved serum immunoglobulin free light chain levels (dFLC) was 162.9 (57.9-401.6) mg/L. More subjects in the high dFLC group had higher BNP (P=0.005) , and shorter median survival than those in the low dFLC group (15 months vs 47 months, P<0.001) . Similar results of median survival were observed when the patients were redivided by a new cut-off value of 180 mg/L for dFLC (high dFLC group: 22 months, low dFLC group: 40 months, P=0.001) , or a κ/λ ratio in which patients with κ type sFLC-ratio<3.79 and λ type sFLC-ratio≥0.06 were grouped into the low sFLC-ratio (37 months) , and the reverse the high sFLC-ratio ones (25 months, P=0.021) . In multivariate analysis, dFLC and New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification of cardiac function were two risk factors associated with all-cause mortality in patients, of them the hazard ratio for higher dFLC was 12.13 (95%CI 2.98-49.30, P<0.001) . Conclusion: Measurement of the sFLC level could implicate the prognosis of AL-CA.

Inter-assay variability in automated serum free light chain assays and their use in the clinical laboratory

Serum κ and λ free light chain levels are markers of plasma cell proliferation, and their measurements have been included in recent guidelines by the International Myeloma Working Group for the management of patients with plasma cellular dyscrasias. Five in vitro diagnostic methods for the immunochemical quantification of serum free light chains (FLC) are available, three based on polyclonal antibodies (Freelite^®, The Binding Site; FLC ELISA κ and λ, Sebia; human κ and λ FLC, Diazyme Laboratories) and two on monoclonal antibodies (N Latex FLC, Siemens Healthineers; Seralite^®, Sebia). Several studies have shown that these methods cannot be used interchangeably for the follow-up of patients because measured κ and λ FLC concentrations may differ significantly, especially at high levels. Because no international reference material for the measurement of FLC is available, it is not possible to establish which method is the most accurate. For this reason, knowledge about the analytical and diagnostic performances of the assays used is important. The aim of this review is to describe the main analytical features of the κ and λ FLC assays and how they may influence the clinical use of these parameters.