The impact of bridging therapy prior to CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in patients with large B-cell lymphoma

The underlying mechanism of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy triggering secondary T-cell cancers: Mystery of the Sphinx?

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reported cases of T-cell malignancies, including CAR-positive lymphomas, in patients receiving B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)- or CD19-targeted autologous CAR-T cell immunotherapy. These reports were derived from clinical trials and/or post-marketing adverse event data. This finding has attracted widespread attention. Therefore, it is essential to explore the potential mechanisms by which chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy triggers secondary T-cell cancers to further guarantee the safety of CAR-T cell therapy.

Defining primary refractory large B-cell lymphoma

ABSTRACT

Patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) that fail to achieve a complete response (CR) or who relapse early after anthracycline-containing immunochemotherapy (IC) have a poor prognosis and are commonly considered to have "primary refractory disease." However, different definitions of primary refractory disease are used in the literature and clinical practice. In this study, we examined variation in the time to relapse used to define refractory status and association with survival outcomes in patients with primary refractory LBCL in a single-center prospective cohort with validation in an independent multicenter cohort. Patients with newly diagnosed LBCL were enrolled in the Molecular Epidemiological Resource cohort (MER; N = 949) or the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes cohort (LEO; N = 2755) from September 2002 to May 2021. Primary refractory LBCL was defined as no response (stable disease [SD]) or progressive disease (PD) during, or by the end of, frontline (1L) IC (primary PD; PPD); partial response at end of treatment (EOT PR); or relapse within 3 to 12 months after achieving CR at EOT to 1L IC (early relapse). In the MER cohort, patients with PPD had inferior overall survival (OS; 2-year OS rate: 15% MER, 31% LEO) when compared with other subgroups considered in defining primary refractory disease, EOT PR (2-year OS rate: 38% MER, 50% LEO) and early relapse (2-year OS rate: 44% MER, 58% LEO). Among patients receiving 1L IC with curative intent, we identified that patients with PPD are the key subgroup with poor outcomes. We propose a definition of primary refractory LBCL as SD or PD during, or by the end of, 1L treatment.

Role of radiation in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Current studies and future prospects

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has revolutionized the treatment approach for patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R NHL). However, the long-term prognosis has been discouraging. Moreover, the urgent resolution of two critical issues is necessary: minimize tumor burden before CAR-T infusion and control fatal toxicities post CAR-T therapy. By combining radiotherapy (RT), the safety and efficacy of CAR-T can be improved. RT can serve as bridging therapy, reducing the tumor burden before CAR-T infusion, thus enabling safe and successful CAR-T infusion, and as salvage therapy in cases of CAR-T therapy failure. This review aims to discuss the current evidence supporting the use of RT in CAR-T therapy for patients with R/R NHL. Although most studies have shown a positive role of RT in combined modality treatments for patients undergoing CAR-T therapy, the synergy gained from these remains uncertain. Furthermore, the optimal dose/fraction and radiation response require further investigation.

Activated CD4+ T Cell Proportion in the Peripheral Blood Correlates with the Duration of Cytokine Release Syndrome and Predicts Clinical Outcome after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy

Objective Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is an emerging and effective therapy for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL). The characteristic toxicities of CAR T cell therapy include cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and prolonged cytopenia. We investigated the factors associated with these complications after CAR T cell therapy by analyzing lymphocyte subsets following CAR T cell infusion. Methods We retrospectively analyzed peripheral blood samples on days 7, 14, and 28 after tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) infusion by flow cytometry at our institution between June 2020 and September 2022. Patients Thirty-five patients with R/R DLBCL who received tisa-cel therapy were included. Results A flow cytometry-based analysis of blood samples from these patients revealed that the proportion of CD4+CD25+CD127+ T cells (hereafter referred to as "activated CD4+ T cells" ) among the total CD4+ T cells on day 7 after tisa-cel infusion correlated with the duration of CRS (r=0.79, p<0.01). In addition, a prognostic analysis of the overall survival (OS) using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves indicated a significantly more favorable OS and progression-free survival of patients with a proportion of activated CD4+ T cells among the total CD4+ T cells <0.73 (p=0.01, and p<0.01, respectively). Conclusion These results suggest that the proportion of activated CD4+ T cells on day 7 after tisa-cel infusion correlates with the CRS duration and predicts clinical outcomes after CAR T cell therapy. Further studies with a larger number of patients are required to validate these observations.

Afamitresgene autoleucel for advanced synovial sarcoma and myxoid round cell liposarcoma (SPEARHEAD-1): an international, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Afamitresgene autoleucel (afami-cel) showed acceptable safety and promising efficacy in a phase 1 trial (NCT03132922). The aim of this study was to further evaluate the efficacy of afami-cel for the treatment of patients with HLA-A*02 and MAGE-A4-expressing advanced synovial sarcoma or myxoid round cell liposarcoma.

METHODS

SPEARHEAD-1 was an open-label, non-randomised, phase 2 trial done across 23 sites in Canada, the USA, and Europe. The trial included three cohorts, of which the main investigational cohort (cohort 1) is reported here. Cohort 1 included patients with HLA-A*02, aged 16-75 years, with metastatic or unresectable synovial sarcoma or myxoid round cell liposarcoma (confirmed by cytogenetics) expressing MAGE-A4, and who had received at least one previous line of anthracycline-containing or ifosfamide-containing chemotherapy. Patients received a single intravenous dose of afami-cel (transduced dose range 1·0 × 109-10·0 × 109 T cells) after lymphodepletion. The primary endpoint was overall response rate in cohort 1, assessed by a masked independent review committee using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (version 1.1) in the modified intention-to-treat population (all patients who received afami-cel). Adverse events, including those of special interest (cytokine release syndrome, prolonged cytopenia, and neurotoxicity), were monitored and are reported for the modified intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04044768; recruitment is closed and follow-up is ongoing for cohorts 1 and 2, and recruitment is open for cohort 3.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 17, 2019, and July 27, 2021, 52 patients with cytogenetically confirmed synovial sarcoma (n=44) and myxoid round cell liposarcoma (n=8) were enrolled and received afami-cel in cohort 1. Patients were heavily pre-treated (median three [IQR two to four] previous lines of systemic therapy). Median follow-up time was 32·6 months (IQR 29·4-36·1). Overall response rate was 37% (19 of 52; 95% CI 24-51) overall, 39% (17 of 44; 24-55) for patients with synovial sarcoma, and 25% (two of eight; 3-65) for patients with myxoid round cell liposarcoma. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 37 (71%) of 52 of patients (one grade 3 event). Cytopenias were the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events (lymphopenia in 50 [96%], neutropenia 44 [85%], leukopenia 42 [81%] of 52 patients). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

INTERPRETATION

Afami-cel treatment resulted in durable responses in heavily pre-treated patients with HLA-A*02 and MAGE-A4-expressing synovial sarcoma. This study shows that T-cell receptor therapy can be used to effectively target solid tumours and provides rationale to expand this approach to other solid malignancies.

FUNDING

Adaptimmune.

A paradox of choice: Sequencing therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

The available treatments for relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have experienced a dramatic change since 2017. Incremental advances in basic and translational science over several decades have led to innovations in immune-oncology. These innovations have culminated in eight separate approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with R/R DLBCL over the last 10 years. High-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (HDT-ASCT) remains the standard of care for transplant-eligible patients who relapse after an initial remission. For transplant-ineligible patients or for those who relapse following HDT-ASCT, multiple options exist. Monoclonal antibodies targeting CD19, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, immune effector cell products, and other agents with novel mechanisms of action are now available for patients with R/R DLBCL. There is increasing use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells as second-line therapy for patients with early relapse of DLBCL or those who are refractory to initial chemoimmunotherapy. The clinical benefits of these strategies vary and are influenced by patient and disease characteristics, as well as the type of prior therapy administered. Therefore, there are multiple clinical scenarios that clinicians might encounter when treating R/R DLBCL. An optimal sequence of drugs has not been established, and there is no evidence-based consensus on how to best order these agents. This abundance of choices introduces a paradox: proliferating treatment options are initially a boon to patients and providers, but as choices grow further they no longer liberate. Rather, more choices make the management of R/R DLBCL more challenging due to lack of direct comparisons among agents and a desire to maximize patient outcomes. Here, we provide a review of recently-approved second- and subsequent-line agents, summarize real-world data detailing the use of these medicines, and provide a framework for sequencing therapy in R/R DLBCL.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a revolutionary therapy increasingly used in the treatment of non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma. This review focuses on the use of CAR T-cell therapy in aggressive B-cell lymphoma including clinical indications, known short- and long-term toxicity, mechanisms of CAR T-cell efficacy and tumor resistance, and future directions in the treatment of aggressive lymphoma with CAR T-cell therapy.

Promises and challenges of a decentralized CAR T-cell manufacturing model

Autologous chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cell (CAR T) products have demonstrated un-precedent efficacy in treating many relapsed/refractory B-cell and plasma cell malignancies, leading to multiple commercial products now in routine clinical use. These positive responses to CAR T therapy have spurred biotech and big pharma companies to evaluate innovative production methods to increase patient access while maintaining adequate quality control and profitability. Autologous cellular therapies are, by definition, manufactured as single patient batches, and demand has soared for manufacturing facilities compliant with current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) regulations. The use of a centralized production model is straining finite resources even in developed countries in North America and the European Union, and patient access is not feasible for most of the developing world. The idea of having a more uniform availability of these cell therapy products promoted the concept of point-of-care (POC) manufacturing or decentralized in-house production. While this strategy can potentially decrease the cost of manufacturing, the challenge comes in maintaining the same quality as currently available centrally manufactured products due to the lack of standardized manufacturing techniques amongst institutions. However, academic medical institutions and biotech companies alike have forged ahead innovating and adopting new technologies to launch clinical trials of CAR T products produced exclusively in-house. Here we discuss POC production of CAR T products.

Inferior Outcomes of EU Versus US Patients Treated With CD19 CAR-T for Relapsed/Refractory Large B-cell Lymphoma: Association With Differences in Tumor Burden, Systemic Inflammation, Bridging Therapy Utilization, and CAR-T Product Use

Real-world evidence suggests a trend toward inferior survival of patients receiving CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in Europe (EU) and with tisagenlecleucel. The underlying logistic, patient- and disease-related reasons for these discrepancies remain poorly understood. In this multicenter retrospective observational study, we studied the patient-individual journey from CAR-T indication to infusion, baseline features, and survival outcomes in 374 patients treated with tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) or axicabtagene-ciloleucel (axi-cel) in EU and the United States (US). Compared with US patients, EU patients had prolonged indication-to-infusion intervals (66 versus 50 d; P < 0.001) and more commonly received intermediary therapies (holding and/or bridging therapy, 94% in EU versus 74% in US; P < 0.001). Baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (median 321 versus 271 U/L; P = 0.02) and ferritin levels (675 versus 425 ng/mL; P = 0.004) were significantly elevated in the EU cohort. Overall, we observed inferior survival in EU patients (median progression-free survival [PFS] 3.1 versus 9.2 months in US; P < 0.001) and with tisa-cel (3.2 versus 9.2 months with axi-cel; P < 0.001). On multivariate Lasso modeling, nonresponse to bridging, elevated ferritin, and increased C-reactive protein represented independent risks for treatment failure. Weighing these variables into a patient-individual risk balancer (high risk [HR] balancer), we found higher levels in EU versus US and tisa-cel versus axi-cel cohorts. Notably, superior PFS with axi-cel was exclusively evident in patients at low risk for progression (according to the HR balancer), but not in high-risk patients. These data demonstrate that inferior survival outcomes in EU patients are associated with longer time-to-infusion intervals, higher tumor burden/LDH levels, increased systemic inflammatory markers, and CAR-T product use.

Long-term outcomes following CAR T cell therapy: what we know so far

Chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) are engineered fusion proteins designed to target T cells to antigens expressed on cancer cells. CAR T cells are now an established treatment for patients with relapsed and/or refractory B cell lymphomas, B cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and multiple myeloma. At the time of this writing, over a decade of follow-up data are available from the initial patients who received CD19-targeted CAR T cells for B cell malignancies. Data on the outcomes of patients who received B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted CAR T cells for multiple myeloma are more limited owing to the more recent development of these constructs. In this Review, we summarize long-term follow-up data on efficacy and toxicities from patients treated with CAR T cells targeting CD19 or BCMA. Overall, the data demonstrate that CD19-targeted CAR T cells can induce prolonged remissions in patients with B cell malignancies, often with minimal long-term toxicities, and are probably curative for a subset of patients. By contrast, remissions induced by BCMA-targeted CAR T cells are typically more short-lived but also generally have only limited long-term toxicities. We discuss factors associated with long-term remissions, including the depth of initial response, malignancy characteristics predictive of response, peak circulating CAR levels and the role of lymphodepleting chemotherapy. We also discuss ongoing investigational strategies designed to improve the length of remission following CAR T cell therapy.

Predictors of response to axicabtagene-ciloleucel CAR T cells in aggressive B cell lymphomas: A real-world study

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy has shown promising efficacy in relapsed and refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). While most patients undergo CAR T infusion with active disease, the impact of some clinical variables, such as responsiveness to the pre-CAR T chemotherapy on the response to CAR T, is unknown. In this single-institution study, we studied the impact of several pre-CAR T variables on the post-CAR outcomes. Sixty patients underwent apheresis for axicabtagene-ciloleucel (axi-cel) and 42 of them (70.0%) had primary refractory disease. Bridging therapy between apheresis and lymphodepletion was given in 34 patients (56.7%). After axi-cel, the overall response rate was 63.3%. Responsiveness to the immediate pre-CAR T therapy did not show a significant association with response to axi-cel, progression-free (PFS) or overall (OS) survival. Multivariable analysis determined that bulky disease before lymphodepletion was independently associated with inferior outcomes, and patients that presented with high-burden disease unresponsive to immediate pre-CAR T therapy had a dismal outcome. This data supports proceeding with treatment in CAR T candidates regardless of their response to immediate pre-CAR T therapy. Interim therapeutic interventions should be considered in patients who have known risk factors for poor outcomes (bulky disease, high LDH).

Association of bridging therapy utilization with clinical outcomes in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy

Background

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy recipients may receive bridging therapy while awaiting product manufacturing to control disease. Yet, data are lacking regarding the impact of bridging therapy use on clinical outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 235 patients who received CAR T-cell therapy at two tertiary care centers from February 2016 to December 2019. We abstracted clinical outcomes from review of the electronic health record including (1) overall response; (2) complete response (CR); (3) progression-free survival (PFS); (4) overall survival (OS); and (5) toxicity (cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity). We assessed the association of bridging therapy use with overall response rate (ORR) and CR rate using multivariable logistic regression and with PFS and OS using multivariable Cox regression controlling for covariates. We analyzed the association of bridging therapy use with CRS and neurotoxicity using Fisher’s exact test.

Results

Patients’ median age was 63.1 years (range: 19–82), and the majority were men (144/235, 61.3%). Most patients received axicabtagene ciloleucel (192/235, 81.7%), and the most common lymphoma subtype was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or grade 3B follicular lymphoma (107/235, 45.5%). Overall, 39.4% (93/236) received bridging therapy. Bridging therapy regimens included systemic chemotherapy (48/92, 52.2%), corticosteroids (25/92, 27.2%), radiation (9/92, 9.8%), and other systemic therapies (10/92, 10.9%). In multivariable Cox regression, bridging therapy use was associated with OS (HR: 1.97, p=0.004) but not PFS (HR: 1.18, p=0.449). In multivariable logistic regression, bridging therapy use was not associated with ORR (OR: 0.69, p=0.391) or CR rate (OR: 0.96, p=0.901). We did not identify an association of bridging therapy use with grade 3+ CRS (p=0.574) or grade 3+ neurotoxicity (p=0.748).

Conclusions

We identified that bridging therapy use is not associated with differences in ORR, CR rate, or PFS but is associated with worse OS. These data suggest bridging therapy may be a surrogate for additional poor prognostic factors leading to inferior OS and underscore the need for novel bridging therapy regimens to optimize outcomes in this patient population.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between bridging therapy and outcomes of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in patients with large B cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

The existing evidence about the impact of bridging therapy (BT) on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy in patients with large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) is conflicting. Therefore, we reviewed all available evidence to examine the association between BT and CAR-T therapy outcomes by systematic review and meta-analysis approach.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently searched Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library to identify all records that described BT for LBCL treated with CAR-T. We then applied a fixed- or random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and rate ratio (RRs) for efficacy and safety endpoints and assessed differences across various BT modalities. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate study quality.

RESULTS

Twenty-six reports from 24 studies involving 2014 patients were included in the analysis. Pooled results showed that patients requiring BT had significantly worse 1-year overall survival rate (RR = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.85, P < 0.001), 1-year progression-free survival rate (RR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.60-0.85, P < 0.001), progression-free survival (HR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.07-1.69, P = 0.01), overall response rate (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.95, P = 0.001), complete response rate (RR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-0.93, P = 0.005), and grade ≥3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (RR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.10-1.87, P = 0.007), and tended to have poorer overall survival (HR = 1.42, 95% CI 0.99-2.02, P = 0.056) and grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (RR = 1.59, 95% CI 0.92-2.75, P = 0.096). Prolonged cytopenias were the common toxicity event associated with BT. Radiotherapy may serve as a promising BT option that can provide safe and effective disease control for patients with LBCL before CAR-T infusion. The inconsistency of patient baselines in the current study hindered further comparisons between different BT modalities. Most of the available evidence was rated as low quality because of concerns over low comparability.

CONCLUSION

BT appears to be associated with comparatively poor efficacy and safety outcomes after CAR-T infusion. However, due to the considerable heterogeneity between the BT and non-BT cohorts at disease baseline, no definitive conclusions can be made for the true impact of BT on CAR-T until further randomized studies are conducted.