1
|
Katsimperis S, Pinitas A, Zerva M, Bellos T, Manolitsis I, Feretzakis G, Verykios VS, Kyriazis I, Neofytou P, Kapsalos S, Deligiannis P, Triantafyllou P, Juliebø-Jones P, Somani B, Mitsogiannis I, Tzelves L. The Contemporary Role of Salvage Radical Prostatectomy in the Management of Recurrent Prostate Cancer: An Up-to-Date Review. Life (Basel) 2024; 14:868. [PMID: 39063621 PMCID: PMC11277914 DOI: 10.3390/life14070868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Revised: 07/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer among men, with many treatment modalities available for patients, such as radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound, cryotherapy, electroporation and other whole-gland or focal ablative novel techniques. Unfortunately, up to 60% of men with prostate cancer experience recurrence at 5 to 10 years. Salvage radical prostatectomy can be offered as an option in the setting of recurrence after a primary non-surgical treatment. However, the complexity of salvage radical prostatectomy is considered to be greater than that of primary surgery, making it the least popular treatment of choice. With the wide use of robotic platforms in urologic oncologic surgery, salvage radical prostatectomy has attracted attention again because, compared to past data, modern series involving salvage Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy have shown promising results. In this narrative literature review, we comprehensively examined data on salvage radical prostatectomy. We investigated the correlation between the different types of primary prostate cancer therapy and the following salvage radical prostatectomy. Furthermore, we explored the concept of a robotic approach and its beneficial effect in salvage surgery. Lastly, we emphasized several promising avenues for future research in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stamatios Katsimperis
- Second Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece; (T.B.); (I.M.); (I.K.); (P.N.); (S.K.); (P.D.); (P.T.); (I.M.); (L.T.)
| | - Alexandros Pinitas
- Department of Urology, General Hospital of Athens “G. Gennimatas”, 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - Maria Zerva
- Department of Urology, Red Cross General Hospital of Athens, 11526 Athens, Greece;
| | - Themistoklis Bellos
- Second Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece; (T.B.); (I.M.); (I.K.); (P.N.); (S.K.); (P.D.); (P.T.); (I.M.); (L.T.)
| | - Ioannis Manolitsis
- Second Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece; (T.B.); (I.M.); (I.K.); (P.N.); (S.K.); (P.D.); (P.T.); (I.M.); (L.T.)
| | - Georgios Feretzakis
- School of Science and Technology, Hellenic Open University, 26335 Patras, Greece; (G.F.); (V.S.V.)
| | - Vassilios S. Verykios
- School of Science and Technology, Hellenic Open University, 26335 Patras, Greece; (G.F.); (V.S.V.)
| | - Ioannis Kyriazis
- Second Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece; (T.B.); (I.M.); (I.K.); (P.N.); (S.K.); (P.D.); (P.T.); (I.M.); (L.T.)
| | - Panagiotis Neofytou
- Second Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece; (T.B.); (I.M.); (I.K.); (P.N.); (S.K.); (P.D.); (P.T.); (I.M.); (L.T.)
| | - Sotirios Kapsalos
- Second Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece; (T.B.); (I.M.); (I.K.); (P.N.); (S.K.); (P.D.); (P.T.); (I.M.); (L.T.)
| | - Panagiotis Deligiannis
- Second Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece; (T.B.); (I.M.); (I.K.); (P.N.); (S.K.); (P.D.); (P.T.); (I.M.); (L.T.)
| | - Panagiotis Triantafyllou
- Second Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece; (T.B.); (I.M.); (I.K.); (P.N.); (S.K.); (P.D.); (P.T.); (I.M.); (L.T.)
| | | | - Bhaskar Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK;
| | - Iraklis Mitsogiannis
- Second Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece; (T.B.); (I.M.); (I.K.); (P.N.); (S.K.); (P.D.); (P.T.); (I.M.); (L.T.)
| | - Lazaros Tzelves
- Second Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15126 Athens, Greece; (T.B.); (I.M.); (I.K.); (P.N.); (S.K.); (P.D.); (P.T.); (I.M.); (L.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zuur LG, de Barros HA, van Oosterom MN, Berrens AC, Donswijk ML, Hendrikx JJMA, Bekers EM, Vis AN, Wit EM, van Leeuwen FB, van der Poel HG, van Leeuwen PJ. 99mTcPSMA-radioguided surgery in oligorecurrent prostate cancer: the randomised TRACE-II trial. BJU Int 2024; 134:81-88. [PMID: 38346924 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether combination treatment of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based radioguided surgery (RGS) with short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) improves oncological outcomes in men with oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa) as compared to treatment with short-term ADT only. METHODS The TRACE-II study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomised controlled clinical trial. Patients (aged >18 years) with hormone-sensitive recurrent PCa after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy (brachytherapy or external beam radiotherapy), with involvement of ≤2 lymph nodes or local oligorecurrent disease within the pelvis as determined by PSMA positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio between 6-month ADT (Arm A) or 6-month ADT plus RGS (Arm B). The primary objective is to determine clinical progression-free survival (CPFS) at 24 months. After PSMA-RGS, CPFS is defined as the time between the start of treatment and the appearance of a re-recurrence (any N1 or M1) as suggested by PSMA-PET/CT or symptoms related to progressive PCa, or death from any cause. The secondary objectives include metastasis-free survival at 2, 5 and 10 years, biochemical progression-free survival at 2 years, and patient-reported quality of life at 2, 5 and 10 years. A total of 60 patients, 30 per arm, will be included. The trial is powered (80%) to detect at least a 30% absolute difference in CPFS between the two study arms in the period 2 years after randomisation. We expect to enrol the required participants in 3 years. The study has an expected duration of 5 years in total. CONCLUSIONS Combining RGS with short-term ADT might be oncologically beneficial for patients with oligorecurrent PCa. In this first randomised controlled trial, we are investigating the potential oncological benefits of this combined treatment, while also focusing on maintaining quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lotte G Zuur
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Prostate Cancer Network, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hilda A de Barros
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Prostate Cancer Network, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthias N van Oosterom
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Anne-Claire Berrens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Prostate Cancer Network, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten L Donswijk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen J M A Hendrikx
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elise M Bekers
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André N Vis
- Netherlands Prostate Cancer Network, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther M Wit
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Prostate Cancer Network, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fijs B van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Prostate Cancer Network, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Prostate Cancer Network, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kamitani N, Watanabe K, Ikeda N, Kawata Y, Tokiya R, Hayashi T, Miyaji Y, Tamada T, Katsui K. Long-term outcomes of high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy without hormone therapy for high-risk localized prostate cancer. Jpn J Radiol 2024:10.1007/s11604-024-01621-4. [PMID: 38951462 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-024-01621-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Until March 2018, patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer had been administered high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) without additional hormone therapy (HT) at our institution. In this study, we aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes of this treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with prostate cancer who received HDR-BT and EBRT between April 1997 and March 2021 and who were followed up for at least 6 months were included in the study. High-risk groups were classified into five levels according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. The EBRT and HDR-BT doses were 39-45 Gy/13-25 fractions. and 16.5-22 Gy/2-4 fractions, respectively. None of the patients received HT during initial treatment. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate biochemical freedom from failure (bFFF), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) rates. Biochemical failure was also determined. RESULTS Seventy-two patients were enrolled in the study, with a median follow-up of 91.9 months. The median age and initial prostate-specific antigen (iPSA) level were 71 years and 10.95 ng/mL, respectively. The median biologically effective dose for HDR-BT plus EBRT was 270.3 Gy. The 5- and 7-year bFFF, CSS, and OS rates were 85.2 and 74.2%, 100 and 100%, and 95.7 and 91.9%, respectively. Only the iPSA ≤ 20 group was associated with the higher bFFF rate. The 7-year bFFF rates in the groups with iPSA ≤ 20 and iPSA > 20 were 86.6 and 48.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION HDR-BT plus EBRT without HT might be an alternative treatment option for patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer and iPSA levels ≤ 20. Further studies are required to validate the efficacy of this treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuhiko Kamitani
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan
| | - Kenta Watanabe
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan.
| | - Naoki Ikeda
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan
| | - Yujiro Kawata
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan
| | - Ryoji Tokiya
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan
| | - Takafumi Hayashi
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Miyaji
- Department of Urology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Tamada
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan
| | - Kuniaki Katsui
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ekanger C, Helle SI, Reisæter L, Hysing LB, Kvåle R, Honoré A, Gravdal K, Pilskog S, Dahl O. Salvage Reirradiation for Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Results From a Prospective Study With 7.2 Years of Follow-Up. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1934-1942. [PMID: 38652872 PMCID: PMC11191049 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There are no well-established re-treatment options for local recurrence after primary curative radiation therapy for prostate cancer (PCa), as prospective studies with long-term follow-up are lacking. Here, we present results from a prospective study on focal salvage reirradiation with external-beam radiation therapy with a median follow-up of 7.2 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS From 2013 to 2017, 38 patients with biopsy-proven locally recurrent PCa >2 years after previous treatment and absence of grade 2-3 toxicity from the first course of radiation were included. The treatment was 35 Gy in five fractions to the MRI-based target volume and 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy starting 3 months before radiation. The Phoenix criteria defined biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), and toxicity was scored according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. RESULTS Median age was 70 years, and median time from primary radiation to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence was 83 months. The actuarial 2-year and 5-year bRFS were 81% (95% CI, 69 to 94) and 58% (95% CI, 49 to 74), respectively. The actuarial 5-year local recurrence-free survival was 93% (95% CI, 82 to 100), metastasis-free survival was 82% (95% CI, 69 to 95), and overall survival was 87% (95% CI, 76 to 98). Two patients (5%) had durable grade 3 genitourinary toxicity, one combined with GI grade 3 toxicity. A PSA doubling time ≤6 months at salvage, a Gleason score >7, and a PSA nadir ≥0.1 ng/mL predicted a worse outcome. CONCLUSION Reirradiation with EBRT for locally recurrent PCa after primary curative radiation therapy is clinically feasible and demonstrated a favorable outcome with acceptable toxicity in this prospective study with long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Ekanger
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Svein Inge Helle
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Lars Reisæter
- Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Liv Bolstad Hysing
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Technology and Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Rune Kvåle
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Alfred Honoré
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Karsten Gravdal
- Department of Patohology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Sara Pilskog
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Technology and Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Olav Dahl
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meijer D, van Leeuwen PJ, Eppinga WS, Vanneste BG, Meijnen P, Daniels LA, van den Bergh RC, Lont AP, Bodar YJ, Ettema RH, de Bie KC, Oudshoorn FH, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, van der Poel HG, Donswijk ML, Heymans MW, Oprea-Lager DE, Schaake EE, Vis AN. Development and Internal Validation of a Novel Nomogram Predicting the Outcome of Salvage Radiation Therapy for Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy in Patients without Metastases on Restaging Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 61:37-43. [PMID: 38384437 PMCID: PMC10879939 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Owing to the greater use of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), patient selection for local salvage radiation therapy (sRT) has changed. Our objective was to determine the short-term efficacy of sRT in patients with BCR after RARP, and to develop a novel nomogram predicting BCR-free survival after sRT in a nationwide contemporary cohort of patients who underwent PSMA PET/CT before sRT for BCR of PCa, without evidence of metastatic disease. Methods All 302 eligible patients undergoing PCa sRT in four reference centers between September 2015 and August 2020 were included. We conducted multivariable logistic regression analysis using a backward elimination procedure to develop a nomogram for predicting biochemical progression of PCa, defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥0.2 ng/ml above the post-sRT nadir within 1 yr after sRT. Key findings and limitations Biochemical progression of disease within 1 yr after sRT was observed for 56/302 (19%) of the study patients. The final predictive model included PSA at sRT initiation, pathological grade group, surgical margin status, PSA doubling time, presence of local recurrence on PSMA PET/CT, and the presence of biochemical persistence (first PSA result ≥0.1 ng/ml) after RARP. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for this model was 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.64-0.79). Using our nomogram, patients with a predicted risk of >20% had a 30.8% chance of developing biochemical progression within 1 yr after sRT. Conclusions Our novel nomogram may facilitate better patient counseling regarding early oncological outcome after sRT. Patients with high risk of biochemical progression may be candidates for more extensive treatment. Patient summary We developed a new tool for predicting cancer control outcomes of radiotherapy for patients with recurrence of prostate cancer after surgical removal of their prostate. This tool may help in better counseling of these patients with recurrent cancer regarding their early expected outcome after radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennie Meijer
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J. van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wietse S.C. Eppinga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ben G.L. Vanneste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Philip Meijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laurien A. Daniels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anne P. Lont
- Department of Urology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Yves J.L. Bodar
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rosemarijn H. Ettema
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katelijne C.C. de Bie
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jakko A. Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G. van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten L. Donswijk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn W. Heymans
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E. Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva E. Schaake
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André N. Vis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wu Q, Bates A, Guntur P, Shamim SA, Nabi G. Detection Rate of PSMA PET Using Different Ligands in Men with Biochemical Recurrent Prostate Cancer Following Radical Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies. Acad Radiol 2024; 31:544-563. [PMID: 37770370 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.08.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the acknowledged diagnostic detection rate of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in prostate cancer, little is known about the quality of evidence, particularly focusing on prospective studies. Most systematic reviews are based on retrospective reports. RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To conduct systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies reporting the diagnostic detection rate of PSMA PET (computed tomography (CT) and MR) for the detection of biochemically recurrent metastatic prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus, from database until March 1, 2023 for randomized controlled trials and prospective studies using PSMA PET imaging in prostate cancer. The primary endpoint was to assess diagnostic detection rate of PSMA PET imaging in the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in men with biochemical relapse following radical treatment. We calculated the pooled overall diagnostic detection rate with 95% CI using a random-effects model and assessed the heterogeneity between the studies including risk of biases estimation. RESULTS A total of 6800 patients from 32 articles were included in this study. The overall detection rate of PSMA PET for prostate cancer was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.63, 0.71). For histologically confirmed lymph nodes, the PPV from 13 prospective studies containing 1496 patients was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93, 0.99). We performed a subgroup analysis of PSMA PET detection rates according to categorically grouped Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) values of 0-0.5, 0.5-1.0, 1.0-2.0, and >2.0 ng/ml and obtained detection rates of 0.44, 0.63, 0.82, and 0.94, respectively. The detection rate of 18F PSMA was better in men with a PSA between 1 ng/ml and 2 ng/ml in comparison to 68Ga PSMA (0.91 with 95% CI 0.81-0.99 vs. 0.79 with 95% CI 0.73, 0.85). CONCLUSION PSMA PET imaging provides a good detection rate for the metastatic recurrence of prostate cancer in men with biochemical relapse following radical treatment. The detection rate improves significantly above a serum PSA value of 1 ng/ml. The diagnostic detection rate of 18F-PSMA is best at PSA values between 1 and 2 ng/ml, in comparison to 68Ga PSMA. This conclusion is heavily biased, further research needs to focus on better methodology to minimize the risk of biases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiushuo Wu
- Centre for Medical Engineering and Technology, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK.
| | - Anthony Bates
- Centre for Medical Engineering and Technology, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | | | - Shamim Ahmed Shamim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ghulam Nabi
- Centre for Medical Engineering and Technology, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sood A, Kishan AU, Evans CP, Feng FY, Morgan TM, Murphy DG, Padhani AR, Pinto P, Van der Poel HG, Tilki D, Briganti A, Abdollah F. The Impact of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging and Tumor Molecular Profiling on Risk Stratification, Treatment Choice, and Oncological Outcomes of Patients with Primary or Relapsed Prostate Cancer: An International Collaborative Review of the Existing Literature. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:27-43. [PMID: 37423774 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2023] [Revised: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The clinical introduction of next-generation imaging methods and molecular biomarkers ("radiogenomics") has revolutionized the field of prostate cancer (PCa). While the clinical validity of these tests has thoroughly been vetted, their clinical utility remains a matter of investigation. OBJECTIVE To systematically review the evidence to date on the impact of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and tissue-based prognostic biomarkers, including Decipher, Prolaris, and Oncotype Dx, on the risk stratification, treatment choice, and oncological outcomes of men with newly diagnosed PCa or those with biochemical failure (BCF). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a quantitative systematic review of the literature using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases (2010-2022) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement guidelines. The validated Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 scoring system was used to assess the risk of bias. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 148 studies (130 on PET and 18 on biomarkers) were included. In the primary PCa setting, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET imaging was not useful in improving T staging, moderately useful in improving N staging, but consistently useful in improving M staging in patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) unfavorable intermediate- to very-high-risk PCa. Its use led to a management change in 20-30% of patients. However, the effect of these treatment changes on survival outcomes was not clear. Similarly, biomarkers in the pretherapy primary PCa setting increased and decreased the risk, respectively, in 7-30% and 32-36% of NCCN low-risk and 31-65% and 4-15% of NCCN favorable intermediate-risk patients being considered for active surveillance. A change in management was noted in up to 65% of patients, with the change being in line with the molecular risk-based reclassification, but again, the impact of these changes on survival outcomes remained unclear. Notably, in the postsurgical primary PCa setting, biomarker-guided adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) was associated with improved oncological control: Δ↓ 2-yr BCF by 22% (level 2b). In the BCF setting, the data were more mature. PSMA PET was consistently useful in improving disease localization-Δ↑ detection for T, N, and M staging was 13-32%, 19-58%, and 9-29%, respectively. Between 29% and 73% of patients had a change in management. Most importantly, these management changes were associated with improved survival outcomes in three trials: Δ↑ 4-yr disease-free survival by 24.3%, Δ↑ 6-mo metastasis-free survival (MFS) by 46.7%, and Δ↑ androgen deprivation therapy-free survival by 8 mo in patients who received PET-concordant RT (level 1b-2b). Biomarker testing in these patients also appeared to be helpful in risk stratifying and guiding the use of early salvage RT (sRT) and concomitant hormonal therapy. Patients with high-genomic-risk scores benefitted from treatment intensification: Δ↑ 8-yr MFS by 20% with the use of early sRT and Δ↑ 12-yr MFS by 11.2% with the use of hormonal therapy alongside early sRT, while low-genomic-risk score patients did equally well with initial conservative management (level 3). CONCLUSIONS Both PSMA PET imaging and tumor molecular profiling provide actionable information in the management of men with primary PCa and those with BCF. Emerging data suggest that radiogenomics-guided treatments translate into direct survival benefits for patients, however, additional prospective data are awaited. PATIENT SUMMARY In this review, we evaluated the utility of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography and tumor molecular profiling in guiding the care of men with prostate cancer (PCa). We found that these tests augmented risk stratification, altered management, and improved cancer control in men with a new diagnosis of PCa or for those experiencing a relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akshay Sood
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Urology, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Christopher P Evans
- Department of Urologic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, UK
| | - Peter Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Henk G Van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Firas Abdollah
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Oka R, Utsumi T, Noro T, Suzuki Y, Iijima S, Sugizaki Y, Somoto T, Kato S, Endo T, Kamiya N, Suzuki H. Progress in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Emerging Imaging Innovations and Therapeutic Approaches. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:507. [PMID: 38339259 PMCID: PMC10854639 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) exhibits a spectrum of heterogeneity, from indolent to highly aggressive forms, with approximately 10-20% of patients experiencing metastatic PCa. Oligometastatic PCa, characterized by a limited number of metastatic lesions in specific anatomical locations, has gained attention due to advanced imaging modalities. Although patients with metastatic PCa typically receive systemic therapy, personalized treatment approaches for oligometastatic PCa are emerging, including surgical and radiotherapeutic interventions. This comprehensive review explores the latest developments in the field of oligometastatic PCa, including its biological mechanisms, advanced imaging techniques, and relevant clinical studies. Oligometastatic PCa is distinct from widespread metastases and presents challenges in patient classification. Imaging plays a crucial role in identifying and characterizing oligometastatic lesions, with new techniques such as prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography demonstrating a remarkable efficacy. The management strategies encompass cytoreductive surgery, radiotherapy targeting the primary tumor, and metastasis-directed therapy for recurrent lesions. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating the effectiveness of these approaches. Oligometastatic PCa occupies a unique position between locally advanced and high-volume metastatic diseases. While a universally accepted definition and standardized diagnostic criteria are still evolving, emerging imaging technologies and therapeutic strategies hold promise for improving the patient outcomes in this intermediate stage of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Takanobu Utsumi
- Department of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1 Shimoshizu, Sakura-shi 285-8741, Chiba, Japan; (R.O.); (T.N.); (Y.S.); (S.I.); (Y.S.); (T.S.); (S.K.); (T.E.); (N.K.); (H.S.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Awiwi MO, Gjoni M, Vikram R, Altinmakas E, Dogan H, Bathala TK, Naik S, Ravizzini G, Kandemirli SG, Elsayes KM, Salem UI. MRI and PSMA PET/CT of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer. Radiographics 2023; 43:e230112. [PMID: 37999983 DOI: 10.1148/rg.230112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer may recur several years after definitive treatment, such as prostatectomy or radiation therapy. A rise in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level is the first sign of disease recurrence, and this is termed biochemical recurrence. Patients with biochemical recurrence have worse survival outcomes. Radiologic localization of recurrent disease helps in directing patient management, which may vary from active surveillance to salvage radiation therapy, androgen-deprivation therapy, or other forms of systemic and local therapy. The likelihood of detecting the site of recurrence increases with higher serum PSA level. MRI provides optimal diagnostic performance for evaluation of the prostatectomy bed. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET radiotracers currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration demonstrate physiologic urinary excretion, which can obscure recurrence at the vesicourethral junction. However, MRI and PSMA PET/CT have comparable diagnostic performance for evaluation of local recurrence after external-beam radiation therapy or brachytherapy. PSMA PET/CT outperforms MRI in identifying recurrence involving the lymph nodes and bones. Caveats for use of both PSMA PET/CT and MRI do exist and may cause false-positive or false-negative results. Hence, these techniques have complementary roles and should be interpreted in conjunction with each other, taking the patient history and results of any additional prior imaging studies into account. Novel PSMA agents at various stages of investigation are being developed, and preliminary data show promising results; these agents may revolutionize the landscape of prostate cancer recurrence imaging in the future. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center. See the invited commentary by Turkbey in this issue. The slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad O Awiwi
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Migena Gjoni
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Raghunandan Vikram
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Emre Altinmakas
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Hakan Dogan
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Tharakeswara K Bathala
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Sagar Naik
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Gregory Ravizzini
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Sedat Giray Kandemirli
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Khaled M Elsayes
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Usama I Salem
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bui VN, Unterrainer LM, Brendel M, Kunte SC, Holzgreve A, Allmendinger F, Bartenstein P, Klauschen F, Unterrainer M, Staehler M, Ledderose S. PSMA-Expression Is Highly Associated with Histological Subtypes of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Potential Implications for Theranostic Approaches. Biomedicines 2023; 11:3095. [PMID: 38002095 PMCID: PMC10668989 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11113095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
In renal cell carcinoma (RCC), accurate imaging methods are required for treatment planning and response assessment to therapy. In addition, there is an urgent need for new therapeutic options, especially in metastatic RCC. One way to combine diagnostics and therapy in a so-called theranostic approach is the use of radioligands directed against surface antigens. For instance, radioligands against prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) have already been successfully used for diagnosis and radionuclide therapy of metastatic prostate cancer. Recent studies have demonstrated that PSMA is expressed not only in prostate cancer but also in the neovasculature of several solid tumors, which has raised hopes to use PSMA-guided theranostic approaches in other tumor entities, too. However, data on PSMA expression in different histopathological subtypes of RCC are sparse. Because a better understanding of PSMA expression in RCC is critical to assess which patients would benefit most from theranostic approaches using PSMA-targeted ligands, we investigated the expression pattern of PSMA in different subtypes of RCC on protein level. Immunohistochemical staining for PSMA was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archival material of major different histological subtypes of RCC (clear cell RCC (ccRCC)), papillary RCC (pRCC) and chromophobe RCC (cpRCC). The extent and intensity of PSMA staining were scored semi-quantitatively and correlated with the histological RCC subtypes. Group comparisons were calculated with the Kruskal-Wallis test. In all cases, immunoreactivity was detected only in the tumor-associated vessels and not in tumor cells. Staining intensity was the strongest in ccRCC, followed by cpRCC and pRCC. ccRCC showed the most diffuse staining pattern, followed by cpRCC and pRCC. Our results provide a rationale for PSMA-targeted theranostic approaches in ccRCC and cpRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinh Ngoc Bui
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
| | - Lena M. Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Sophie C. Kunte
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
| | - Fabian Allmendinger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
| | | | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
- Die RADIOLOGIE, 80331 Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - Stephan Ledderose
- Institute of Pathology, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.K.); (S.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mohan R, Kneebone A, Eade T, Hsiao E, Emmett L, Brown C, Hunter J, Hruby G. Long-term outcomes of SBRT for PSMA PET detected oligometastatic prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:127. [PMID: 37528487 PMCID: PMC10394924 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02302-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oligometastatic disease in prostate cancer (PCa) is a challenging clinical scenario encountered more frequently with the widespread adoption of PSMA-PET. SBRT aims to defer androgen deprivation and may deliver sustained biochemical failure (BF) free survival in selected patients. Little long-term data is currently available regarding the effectiveness of this approach. METHODS A retrospective single institution study of PSMA-PET directed SBRT without initial ADT for oligo-metachronous PCa. Median dose/fractionation was 24 Gy in 2# to bones and 30 Gy in 3# to lymph nodes. The primary endpoint was time to BF (PSA + 0.2 ug/L above nadir). Secondary endpoints included time to ADT for relapse (i.e. palliative ADT), BF defined as PSA nadir + 2 ug/L, toxicity, patterns of failure and survival. Patients were excluded if they received ADT with their SBRT, had short disease-free interval, or > 3 metastases on PSMA-PET. RESULTS 103 patients treated from November-2014 to December-2019 were analysed from our prospective database. Median follow-up was 5 years. 64 patients were treated for nodal only disease, 35 bone only and 4 mixed. 15% were free of any BF at 5 years with median time to BF of 1.1 years. 32% (33/103) of patients had further curative-intent radiation treatment following their first BF after SBRT, including subsequent SBRT. Eight patients underwent potentially curative treatment for their second or third relapse. Allowing for salvage treatment, 29/103 (28%) were biochemically disease free at last follow up. At 5 years, 39% of patients had never received any ADT and 55% had not started ADT for relapse with a median time to ADT for relapse of 5.5 years. There were 2 grade 3 toxicities (rib fracture and lymphoedema), and no local failures. CONCLUSION PSMA-PET guided SBRT for oligo-metachronous PCa recurrence in appropriately triaged patients results in excellent local control, low toxicity and over 50% ADT free at 5 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riche Mohan
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia.
- Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia.
| | - A Kneebone
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
- Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - T Eade
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
- Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - E Hsiao
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
- Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - L Emmett
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
- Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, 2010, Australia
| | - Christopher Brown
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
- Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - J Hunter
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
- Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - G Hruby
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
- Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rednam N, Kundra V. Hybrid magnetic resonance and PET imaging for prostate cancer recurrence. Curr Opin Oncol 2023; 35:231-238. [PMID: 36966496 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Recurrence post definitive local therapy by prostatectomy or radiation therapy is often detected via rise in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels; however, PSA rise does not localize the disease. Distinguishing local versus distant recurrence guides whether to choose subsequent local versus systemic therapy. The purpose of this article is to review imaging for prostate cancer recurrence post local therapy. RECENT FINDINGS Among imaging modalities, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is commonly used to assess for local recurrence. New radiopharmaceuticals target prostate cancer cells and enable whole-body imaging. These tend to be more sensitive for lymph node metastases than MRI or computed tomography (CT) and for bone lesions than bone scan at lower PSA levels but can be limited for local prostate cancer recurrence. Given greater soft tissue contrast, similar criteria for lymph nodes, and greater sensitivity for prostate bone metastases, MRI is advantageous to CT. MRI of the whole body and mpMRI are now feasible within a reasonable time frame and complementary to PET imaging, enabling whole-body and pelvis-focused PET-MRI, which should be advantageous in the setting of recurrent prostate cancer. SUMMARY Hybrid PET-MRI with prostate cancer targeted radiopharmaceuticals and whole body with local multiparametric MRI can be complementary for detecting local and distant recurrence to guide treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikita Rednam
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gaudreault M, Chang D, Hardcastle N, Jackson P, Kron T, Hofman MS, Siva S. Combined biology-guided radiotherapy and Lutetium PSMA theranostics treatment in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1134884. [PMID: 36994211 PMCID: PMC10040757 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1134884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundLutetium-177 [177Lu]-PSMA-617 is a targeted radioligand that binds to prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and delivers radiation to metastatic prostate cancer. The presence of PSMA-negative/FDG-positive metastases can preclude patients from being eligible for this treatment. Biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT) is a treatment modality that utilises tumour PET emissions to guide external beam radiotherapy. The feasibility of combining BgRT and Lutetium-177 [177Lu]-PSMA-617 for patients with PSMA-negative/FDG-positive metastatic prostate cancer was explored.Materials and methodsAll patients excluded from the LuPSMA clinical trial (ID: ANZCTR12615000912583) due to PSMA/FDG discordance were retrospectively reviewed. A hypothetical workflow where PSMA-negative/FDG-positive metastases would be treated with BgRT whilst PSMA-positive metastases would be treated with Lutetium-177 [177Lu]-PSMA-617 was considered. Gross tumour volume (GTV) of PSMA-negative/FDG-positive tumours were delineated on the CT component of the FDG PET/CT scan. Tumours were deemed suitable for BgRT if (1) normalised SUV (nSUV), defined as the ratio of maximum SUV (SUVmax) inside the GTV to mean SUV inside a 5 mm/10 mm/20 mm margin expansion of the GTV, was larger than a pre-specified nSUV threshold and (2) there was no PET avidity inside the margin expansion.ResultsIn 75 patients screened for Lutetium-177 [177Lu]-PSMA-617 treatment, 6 patients were excluded due to PSMA/FDG discordance and 89 PSMA-negative/FDG-positive targets were identified. GTV volumes ranged from 0.3 cm3 to 186 cm3 (median GTV volume = 4.3 cm3, IQR = 2.2 cm3 – 7.4 cm3). SUVmax inside GTVs ranged between 3 and 12 (median SUVmax = 4.8, IQR = 3.9 – 6.2). With nSUV ≥ 3, 67%/54%/39% of all GTVs were suitable for BgRT within 5 mm/10 mm/20 mm from the tumour. Bone and lung metastases were the best candidates for BgRT (40%/27% of all tumours suitable for BgRT with nSUV ≥ 3 within 5 mm from the GTV were bone/lung GTVs).ConclusionsCombined BgRT/Lutetium-177 [177Lu]-PSMA-617 therapy is feasible for patients with PSMA/FDG discordant metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Gaudreault
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- *Correspondence: Mathieu Gaudreault,
| | - David Chang
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nicholas Hardcastle
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Price Jackson
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Tomas Kron
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael S. Hofman
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence (ProsTIC), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shankar Siva
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Padayachee J, Chaudhary S, Shim B, So J, Lim R, Raman S. Utilizing clinical, pathological and radiological information to guide postoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:293-305. [PMID: 36795862 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2181795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A detectable and rising PSA following radical prostatectomy is indicative of recurrent prostate cancer. Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) with/without androgen deprivation therapy represents the main treatment option for these patients and has been historically associated with a biochemical control rate of ~70%. To determine the optimal timing, diagnostic workup, radiotherapy dosefractionation, treatment volume, and use of systemic therapy, several informative studies have been conducted in the last decade. AREAS COVERED This review examines the recent evidence to guide radiotherapy decision making in the SRT setting. Key topics include adjuvant vs salvage RT, utilization of molecular imaging and genomic classifiers, length of androgen deprivation therapy, inclusion of elective pelvic volume, and emerging role for hypofractionation. EXPERT OPINION Recently reported trials, conducted in an era prior to the routine use of molecular imaging and genomic classifiers, have been pivotal in establishing the current standard of care for SRT in prostate cancer. However, decisions about radiation treatment and systemic therapy may be tailored based on available prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Data from contemporary clinical trials are awaited to define and establish individualized, biomarker-driven approaches for SRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerusha Padayachee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Simone Chaudhary
- Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Brian Shim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jonathan So
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Remy Lim
- Mercy PET/CT Epsom, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Radiology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Srinivas Raman
- Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Burgard C, Hoffmann MA, Frei M, Buchholz HG, Khreish F, Marlowe RJ, Schreckenberger M, Ezziddin S, Rosar F. Detection Efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer with Very Low PSA Levels: A 7-Year, Two-Center "Real-World" Experience. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15051376. [PMID: 36900169 PMCID: PMC10000220 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
In biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (BCR), prompt tumor localization guides early treatment, potentially improving patient outcomes. Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen-11 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT) detection rates of lesions suspicious for prostate cancer are well known to rise along with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration. However, published data are limited regarding very low values (≤0.2 ng/mL). We retrospectively analyzed ~7-year "real-world" experience in this setting in a large post-prostatectomy cohort (N = 115) from two academic clinics. Altogether 44 lesions were detected in 29/115 men (25.2%) (median [minimum-maximum] 1 [1-4]/positive scan). The apparent oligometastatic disease was found in nine patients (7.8%) at PSA as low as 0.03 ng/mL. Scan positivity rates were highest when PSA was >0.15 ng/mL, PSA doubling time was ≤12 months, or the Gleason score was ≥7b (in 83 and 107 patients, respectively, with available data); these findings were statistically significant (p ≤ 0.04), except regarding PSA level (p = 0.07). Given the benefits of promptly localizing recurrence, our observations suggest the potential value of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in the very low PSA BCR setting, especially in cases with more rapid PSA doubling time or with high-risk histology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Burgard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University—Medical Center, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| | - Manuela A. Hoffmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg University, 55101 Mainz, Germany
- Institute for Preventive Medicine Bw, 56626 Andernach, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Madita Frei
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University—Medical Center, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Georg Buchholz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg University, 55101 Mainz, Germany
| | - Fadi Khreish
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University—Medical Center, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Samer Ezziddin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University—Medical Center, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| | - Florian Rosar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University—Medical Center, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
ESTRO-ACROP recommendations for evidence-based use of androgen deprivation therapy in combination with external-beam radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2023; 183:109544. [PMID: 36813168 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE There is no consensus concerning the appropriate use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) during primary and postoperative external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in the management of prostate cancer (PCa). Thus, the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) Advisory Committee for Radiation Oncology Practice (ACROP) guidelines seeks to present current recommendations for the clinical use of ADT in the various indications of EBRT. MATERIAL AND METHODS A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE PubMed that evaluated EBRT and ADT in prostate cancer. The search focused on randomized, Phase II and III trials published in English from January 2000 to May 2022. In case topics were addressed in the absence of Phase II or III trials, recommendations were labelled accordingly based on the limited body of evidence. Localized PCa was classified according to D'Amico et al. classification in low-, intermediate and high risk PCa. The ACROP clinical committee identified 13 European experts who discussed and analyzed the body of evidence concerning the use of ADT with EBRT for prostate cancer. RESULTS Key issues were identified and are discussed: It was concluded that no additional ADT is recommended for low-risk prostate cancer patients, whereas for intermediate- and high-risk patients four to six months and two to three years of ADT are recommended. Likewise, patients with locally advanced prostate cancer are recommended to receive ADT for two to three years and when ≥ 2 high-risk factors (cT3-4, ISUP grade ≥ 4 or PSA ≥ 40 ng/ml) or cN1 is present ADT for three years plus additional Abiraterone for two years is recommended. For postoperative patients no ADT is recommended for adjuvant EBRT in pN0 patients whereas for pN1 patients adjuvant EBRT with long-term ADT is performed for at least 24 to 36 months. In the setting of salvage EBRT ADT is performed in biochemically persistent PCa patients with no evidence of metastatic disease. Long-term ADT (24 months) is recommended in pN0 patients with high risk of further progression (PSA ≥ 0.7 ng/ml and ISUP grade group ≥ 4) and a life expectancy of over ten years, whereas short-term ADT (6 months) is recommended in pN0 patients with lower risk profile (PSA < 0.7 ng/ml and ISUP grade group 4). Patients considered for ultra-hypofractionated EBRT as well as patients with image based local recurrence within the prostatic fossa or lymph node recurrence should participate in appropriate clinical trials evaluating the role of additional ADT. CONCLUSION These ESTRO-ACROP recommendations are evidence-based and relevant to the use of ADT in combination with EBRT in PCa for the most common clinical settings.
Collapse
|
17
|
Ben Shimol J, Lewin R, Symon Z, Rosenzweig B, Leibowitz-Amit R, Eshet Y, Domachevsky L, Davidson T. The Utility of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in Decisions Regarding Administering Salvage Radiotherapy to Men with Prostate Cancer. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 20:537. [PMID: 36612859 PMCID: PMC9819101 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous papers have described 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)'s sensitivity in identifying prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence. This study aimed to characterize the role of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in deciding to re-irradiate pelvic structures. METHODS 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans performed at Sheba Medical Center over seven years in 113 men were reviewed. All had undergone radiation to the prostate (70, 61.9%) or post-radical prostatectomy radiation to the prostate fossa (PF) (43, 48.1%), and had local or oligometastatic PCa recurrence and received salvage radiotherapy (SRT) based on PET/CT findings. RESULTS Mean age was 70.7 years. The mean grade group was 2.9; the mean prostate-specific antigen was 9.0. The 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT positive findings included: 37 (32.7%) in the prostate, 23 (20.4%) in seminal vesicles, 7 (6.2%) in the PF, and 3 (2.7%) in the seminal vesicle fossa. The mean standardized uptake value was 10.6 ± 10.2 (range: 1.4-61.6); the mean lesion size was 1.8 ± 3.5 mm (range: 0.5-5.1). SRT was directed toward the prostate and seminal vesicles in 48 (42.5%), PF in 18 (15.9%), and intrapelvic lymph node and bone in 47 (41.6%). Toxicities were mostly mild to moderate. CONCLUSION 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-identified relapse with targeted SRT was well-tolerated and may result in less onerous treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Ben Shimol
- Barzilai Medical Center, Ashqelon 7830604, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
| | - Ron Lewin
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel
| | - Zvi Symon
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel
| | - Barak Rosenzweig
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
- Department of Urology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel
| | - Raya Leibowitz-Amit
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
- Oncology Institute, Shamir Medical Center, Zerifin 7033001, Israel
| | - Yael Eshet
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel
| | - Liran Domachevsky
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel
| | - Tima Davidson
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Management of Patients with Recurrent and Metachronous Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer in the Era of PSMA PET. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246194. [PMID: 36551678 PMCID: PMC9777467 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) scans have higher sensitivity and specificity for detecting lymph nodes or metastatic disease relative to conventional imaging in prostate cancer staging. Since its FDA approval and incorporation into treatment guidelines, the use of PSMA PET has increased in patients undergoing initial staging, those with recurrence after initial definitive treatment, and patients with metastatic disease. Although the early detection of metastatic lesions is changing disease management, it is unclear whether this impact on management translates into clinical benefit. This review will summarize evidence pertaining to the change in patient management due to PSMA PET use and will discuss the implications of PSMA PET on treatment decisions in prostate cancer, particularly in the settings of biochemical recurrence and metachronous oligometastatic disease.
Collapse
|
19
|
Metser U, Kulanthaivelu R, Chawla T, Johnson S, Avery L, Hussey D, Veit-Haibach P, Bernardini M, Hogen L. 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in advanced high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer: A prospective pilot study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1025475. [PMID: 36313720 PMCID: PMC9606351 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1025475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Glutamate carboxypeptidase-II (GCP-II), a zinc metalloenzyme that resides in cell membrane, has been reported as overexpressed in the neovasculature of ovarian cancers. The study objective was to determine whether GCP-II targeted imaging with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT can detect disease sites in women with advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Materials and methods Twenty treatment-naïve women with advanced HGSOC were recruited (median age 60 years). Prior to commencing therapy (primary cytoreductive surgery [n=9] or neoadjuvant chemotherapy [n=11]), subjects underwent routine staging with contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT (=CT), followed by 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT (=PET). CT and PET were reported independently using a standardized reporting template assessing 25 sites. The performance of PET was compared to CT in all subjects and to surgery and surgical histopathology in 9 patients who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery. Results Of the 25 sites assessed in 20 patients, CT detected disease in 292/500 (58.4%) locations and PET detected disease in 171/500 (34.2%). Compared to CT the sensitivity (95% CI) of PET to detect disease in the upper abdomen, the gastrointestinal tract or the peritoneum was 0.29 (0.20,0.40), 0.21 (0.11,0.33) and 0.74 (0.64,0.82), respectively. In the surgical cohort, 220 sites in 9 patients were evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of CT and PET were 0.85 versus 0.54 (p<0.001) and 0.73 versus 0.93 (p<0.001), respectively. Conclusion Although 18F-DCFPyL has higher specificity than CT in detecting advanced HGSOC tumor sites, it detects less disease sites than CT, especially in the upper abdomen and along the gastrointestinal tract, likely limiting its clinical utility. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03811899.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ur Metser
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Sinai Health Systems, Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- *Correspondence: Ur Metser,
| | - Roshini Kulanthaivelu
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Sinai Health Systems, Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tanya Chawla
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Sinai Health Systems, Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sarah Johnson
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Sinai Health Systems, Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lisa Avery
- Department of Biostatistics, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Douglas Hussey
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Sinai Health Systems, Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Patrick Veit-Haibach
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Sinai Health Systems, Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marcus Bernardini
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Liat Hogen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ng M, Guerrieri M, Wong LM, Taubman K, Sutherland T, Benson A, Byrne G, Koschel S, Yap K, Starmans M, Ong G, Macleod C, Foo M, Chao M. Changes in Management After 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET in Patients Undergoing Postprostatectomy Radiotherapy, with Early Biochemical Response Outcomes. J Nucl Med 2022; 63:1343-1348. [PMID: 35058320 PMCID: PMC9454460 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) tracers have increased sensitivity in the detection of prostate cancer, compared with conventional imaging. We assessed the management impact of 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT in patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) and report early biochemical response in patients who underwent radiation treatment. Methods: One hundred patients were enrolled into a prospective study, with a prior RP for prostate cancer, a PSA of 0.2-2.0 ng/mL, and no prior treatment. All patients underwent diagnostic CT and PSMA PET/CT, and management intent was completed at 3 time points (original, post-CT, and post-PSMA) and compared. Patients who underwent radiotherapy with 6-mo PSA response data are presented. Results: Ninety-eight patients are reported, with a median PSA of 0.32 ng/mL (95% CI, 0.28-0.36), pT3a/b disease in 71.4%, and an International Society of Urological Pathology grade group of at least 3 in 59.2%. PSMA PET/CT detected disease in 46.9% of patients, compared with 15.5% using diagnostic CT (PSMA PET, 29.2% local recurrence and 29.6% pelvic nodal disease). A major change in management intent was higher after PSMA than after CT (12.5% vs. 3.2%, P = 0.010), as was a moderate change in intent (31.3% vs. 13.7%, P = 0.001). The most common change was an increase in the recommendation for elective pelvic radiation (from 15.6% to 33.3%), nodal boost (from 0% to 22.9%), and use of concurrent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (from 22.9% to 41.7%) from original to post-PSMA intent because of detection of nodal disease. Eighty-six patients underwent 18F-DCFPyL-guided radiotherapy. Fifty-five of 86 patients either did not receive ADT or recovered after ADT, with an 18-mo PSA response from 0.32 to 0.02 ng/mL; 94.5% of patients had a PSA of no more than 0.20 ng/mL, and 74.5% had a PSA of no more than 0.03 ng/mL. Conclusion: 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT has a significant impact on management intent in patients being considered for salvage radiotherapy after RP with PSA recurrence. Increased detection of disease, particularly in the pelvic lymph nodes, resulted in increased pelvic irradiation and concurrent ADT use. Early results in patients who are staged with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT show a favorable PSA response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Ng
- GenesisCare St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
| | | | - Lih Ming Wong
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;,Department of Surgery, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kim Taubman
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tom Sutherland
- Department of Medical Imaging, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;,Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Angela Benson
- GenesisCare CancerCare Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Graeme Byrne
- La Trobe University Statistics Consultancy Platform, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sam Koschel
- GenesisCare CancerCare Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kelvin Yap
- Department of Medical Imaging, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Grace Ong
- GenesisCare, Shepparton, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Marcus Foo
- GenesisCare, Berwick, Victoria, Australia; and
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bravi CA, Heidenreich A, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Suardi N, Mazzone E, Stabile A, Cucchiara V, Osmonov D, Juenemann K, Karnes RJ, Kretschmer A, Buchner A, Stief C, Hiester A, Albers P, Devos G, Joniau S, Van Poppel H, Grubmüller B, Shariat S, Tilki D, Graefen M, Gill IS, Mottrie A, Karakiewicz PI, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Pfister D. Combining PSA and PET features to select candidates for salvage lymph node dissection in recurrent prostate cancer. BJUI COMPASS 2022; 4:123-129. [PMID: 36569505 PMCID: PMC9766859 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the relationship between pre-operative PSA value, 68Ga-prostate-specific-membrane-antigen (PSMA) PET performance and oncologic outcomes after salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) for biochemical recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). Patients and methods The study included 164 patients diagnosed with ≤2 pelvic lymph-node recurrence(s) of PCa documented on 68Ga-PSMA PET scan and treated with pelvic ± retroperitoneal sLND at 11 high-volume centres between 2012 and 2019. Pathologic findings were correlated to PSA values at time of sLND, categorized in early (<0.5 ng/ml), low (0.5-0.99 ng/ml), moderate (1-1.5 ng/ml) and high (>1.5 ng/ml). Clinical recurrence (CR)-free survival after sLND was calculated using multivariable analyses and plotted over pre-operative PSA value. Results Median [interquartile range (IQR)] PSA at sLND was 1.1 (0.6, 2.0) ng/ml, and 131 (80%) patients had one positive spot at PET scan. All patients received pelvic sLND, whereas 91 (55%) men received also retroperitoneal dissection. Median (IQR) number of node removed was 15 (6, 28). The rate of positive pathology increased as a function of pre-operative PSA value, with highest rates for patients with pre-operative PSA > 1.5 ng/ml (pelvic-only sLNDs: 84%; pelvic + retroperitoneal sLNDs: 90%). After sLND, PSA ≤ 0.3 ng/ml was detected in 67 (41%) men. On multivariable analyses, pre-operative PSA was associated with PSA response (p < 0.0001). There were 51 CRs after sLND. After adjusting for confounders, we found a significant, non-linear relationship between PSA level at sLND and the 12-month CR-free survival (p < 0.0001), with the highest probability of freedom from CR for patients who received sLND at PSA level ≥1 ng/ml. Conclusions In case of PET-detected nodal recurrences amenable to sLND, salvage surgery was associated with the highest short-term oncologic outcomes when performed in men with PSA ≥ 1 ng/ml. Awaiting confirmatory data from prospective trials, these findings may help physicians to optimize the timing for 68Ga-PSMA PET in biochemical recurrent PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo A. Bravi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URIIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleMilanItaly,Department of UrologyOLV Ziekenhuis AalstAalstBelgium,ORSI AcademyGhentBelgium
| | | | - Nicola Fossati
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URIIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleMilanItaly
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URIIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleMilanItaly
| | - Nazareno Suardi
- Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino HospitalUniversity of GenovaGenoaItaly
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URIIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleMilanItaly
| | - Armando Stabile
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URIIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleMilanItaly
| | - Vito Cucchiara
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URIIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleMilanItaly
| | - Daniar Osmonov
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Campus KielUniversity Hospital Schleswig HolsteinKielGermany
| | - Klaus‐Peter Juenemann
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Campus KielUniversity Hospital Schleswig HolsteinKielGermany
| | | | | | | | - Christian Stief
- Department of UrologyLudwig‐Maximilians‐UniversityMunichGermany
| | | | - Peter Albers
- Department of Urology, Medical FacultyHeinrich‐Heine‐UniversityDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Gaëtan Devos
- Department of UrologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of UrologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | | | | | - Shahrokh Shariat
- Department of UrologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria,Institute for Urology and Reproductive HealthSechenov UniversityMoscowRussia
| | - Derya Tilki
- Department of UrologyUniversity Hospital Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany,Martini‐Klinik Prostate Cancer CenterUniversity Hospital Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Department of UrologyUniversity Hospital Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany,Martini‐Klinik Prostate Cancer CenterUniversity Hospital Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Inderbir S. Gill
- USC Institute of UrologyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Alexander Mottrie
- Department of UrologyOLV Ziekenhuis AalstAalstBelgium,ORSI AcademyGhentBelgium
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes UnitUniversity of Montreal Health CentreMontrealQuebecCanada
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URIIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleMilanItaly
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URIIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleMilanItaly
| | - David Pfister
- Department of UrologyUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gaudreault M, Chang D, Hardcastle N, Jackson P, Kron T, Hanna GG, Hofman MS, Siva S. Utility of Biology-Guided Radiotherapy to De Novo Metastases Diagnosed During Staging of High-Risk Biopsy-Proven Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:854589. [PMID: 35494012 PMCID: PMC9039647 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.854589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT) uses real-time functional imaging to guide radiation therapy treatment. Positron emission tomography (PET) tracers targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) are superior for prostate cancer detection than conventional imaging. This study aims at describing nodal and distant metastasis distribution from prostate cancer and at determining the proportion of metastatic lesions suitable for BgRT. Methods A single-institution patient subset from the ProPSMA trial (ID ACTRN12617000005358) was analysed. Gross tumour volumes (GTV) were delineated on the CT component of a PSMA PET/CT scan. To determine the suitability of BgRT tracking zones, the normalized SUV (nSUV) was calculated as the ratio of SUVmax inside the GTV to the SUVmean of adjacent three-dimensional shells of thickness 5 mm/10 mm/20 mm as a measure of signal to background contrast. Targets were suitable for BgRT if (1) nSUV was larger than an nSUV threshold and (2) non-tumour tissue inside adjacent shell was free of PET-avid uptake. Results Of this cohort of 84 patients, 24 had at least one pelvic node or metastatic site disease, 1 to 13 lesions per patient, with a total of 98 lesions (60 pelvic nodes/38 extra-pelvic nodal diseases and haematogenous metastases). Target volumes ranged from 0.08 to 9.6 cm3 while SUVmax ranged from 2.1 to 55.0. nSUV ranged from 1.9 to 15.7/2.4 to 25.7/2.5 to 34.5 for the 5 mm/10 mm/20 mm shell expansion. Furthermore, 74%/68%/34% of the lesions had nSUV ≥ 3 and were free of PSMA PET uptake inside the GTV outer shell margin expansion of 5 mm/10 mm/20 mm. Adjacent avid organs were another lesion, bladder, bowel, ureter, prostate, and liver. Conclusions The majority of PSMA PET/CT-defined radiotherapy targets would be suitable for BgRT by using a 10-mm tracking zone in prostate cancer. A subset of lesions had adjacent non-tumour uptake, mainly due to the proximity of ureter or bladder, and may require exclusion from emission tracking during BgRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Gaudreault
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - David Chang
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nicholas Hardcastle
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Price Jackson
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Tomas Kron
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Gerard G Hanna
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence (ProsTIC), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shankar Siva
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Feasibility of biology-guided radiotherapy using PSMA-PET to boost to dominant intraprostatic tumour. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 35:84-89. [PMID: 35662883 PMCID: PMC9156937 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Biology-guided radiation therapy (BGRT) uses PET imaging for online image guidance. PSMA PET uptake is abundant in the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL). BgRT boost to PSMA-avid subvolume in the prostate region may be feasible. Suitable targets for BgRT were identified in the ProPSMA clinical trial.
Background Methods Results Conclusions
Collapse
|
24
|
Pozdnyakov A, Kulanthaivelu R, Bauman G, Ortega C, Veit-Haibach P, Metser U. The impact of PSMA PET on the treatment and outcomes of men with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2022:10.1038/s41391-022-00544-3. [PMID: 35440642 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00544-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET is highly sensitive in identifying disease recurrence in men with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (BCR) after primary therapy and is rapidly being adopted in clinical practice. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the documented impact of PSMA-PET on patient management and outcomes, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, and intermediate and long-term outcome measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS MBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and OVID databases were searched for studies reporting on the impact of PSMA-PET on the management and outcomes of patients with BCR after definitive primary therapy. Outcome measures assessed included biochemical response to therapy after PET and BCR-free survival (BRFS). The proportions of patients in whom management changed, and the proportion of patients in whom each outcome measure was obtained were tabulated and pooled into meta-analysis using DerSimonian-Laird method. RESULTS A total of 34 studies with 3680 men reported change in management after PSMA-PET and 27 studies with 2639 men reported on at least one outcome measure and had follow-up data. PSMA-PET was positive in 2508/3680 (68.2%). The pooled proportion of change in management after PSMA-PET was 56.4% (95% CI, 48.0-63.9%). A decrease in serum PSA was documented in 72.4% of men (95% CI, 63.4-81.5%), and complete biochemical response in 23.3% (95% CI, 14.6-32.0%) at a median follow-up of 8.1 and 11 months, respectively. The pooled BRFS rate was 60.2% (95% CI, 49.1-71.4%) at a median follow-up of 20 months. CONCLUSION In conclusion, PSMA PET is positive in more than 2/3 of men with BCR and impacts patient management in more than half of the men. BRFS after PET-directed management is 60% at a median of 20 months after salvage therapy, and complete biochemical response may be achieved in up to a quarter of men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Pozdnyakov
- Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Roshini Kulanthaivelu
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Glenn Bauman
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Claudia Ortega
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Patrick Veit-Haibach
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ur Metser
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Role of 68Ga and 18F PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a systematic review of prospective studies. Nucl Med Commun 2022; 43:631-637. [PMID: 35438666 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically review the prospective literature on the role of 68Ga and 18F PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI as a tool for functional imaging in prostate cancer biochemical recurrence (BCR), particularly with respect to detection efficacy and impact on management. METHODS We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed in July 2021, focusing on original prospective studies looking at PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI in BCR. RESULTS We included 20 prospective studies reporting on 68Ga and 18F PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI. Pooled PSMA PET positivity was 66.6% out of 2110 patients. The only factor consistently reported as associated with PSMA PET positivity was PSA level at the time of the study. Analysis of PSMA PET positivity rates in differing PSA ranges confirmed increasing positivity with increasing PSA levels. No significant adverse reactions were reported in the 20 studies, but only 6 studies mentioned safety or adverse reactions. A major change of management occurred in 42.7% of all patients scanned with PSMA PET/CT and more specifically 63.2% of those patients positive on PSMA PET/CT. There are no long-term studies that prove a survival benefit from these changes in management. CONCLUSION There is prospective evidence for efficacy of PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI in localizing disease recurrence in BCR, which increases with increasing PSA level at the time of scanning. There are no reported significant adverse effects related to the PSMA PET ligands. There is evidence of major change in management but no evidence for whether this achieves any improvement in outcome.
Collapse
|
26
|
Impact of 18F-PSMA-11 PET/CT on Management of Biochemical Recurrence and High-Risk Prostate Cancer Staging. Mol Imaging Biol 2022; 24:750-758. [DOI: 10.1007/s11307-022-01724-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
27
|
Mena E, Lindenberg L, Choyke P. The Impact of PSMA PET/CT Imaging in Prostate Cancer Radiation Treatment. Semin Nucl Med 2022; 52:255-262. [PMID: 35016755 PMCID: PMC8960055 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Imaging of prostate cancer is rapidly evolving with the introduction of the novel prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging tool for managing recurrent prostate cancer. One immediate impact of PSMA PET is the identification of residual or recurrent lesions that are amenable to external beam radiotherapy. Radiotherapy is used as a definitive curative treatment option for patients with localized prostate cancer alone or in combination therapy. In the setting of biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy, salvage radiation is a potential curative option, and the application of metastasis-directed radiotherapy in the setting of oligometastatic prostate cancer is currently being studied. To maximize the chances of curative therapy, the irradiated tumor volumes should completely encompass the actual extent of disease. Thus, an accurate estimation of the location and delineation of disease targets is critical for radiotherapy planning. The integration of PSMA PET imaging into the routine evaluation of prostate cancer has markedly improved sensitivity and specificity for recurrent disease, even at very low PSA values, which may enable further tailored radiation treatment plans, and help reduce the risk of radiation to adjacent normal tissues. However, while the introduction of PSMA PET will likely change behavior regarding earlier application of radiotherapy, the long-term impact of PSMA PET on patient outcomes is yet to be determined. The aim of the review is to give an overview of the use of PSMA-PET/CT imaging in the setting of radiation therapy for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Mena
- Molecular Imaging Branch, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gonzalez-Moya A, Supiot S, Seegers V, Lizée T, Legouté F, Perennec T, Calais G. Mapping of Recurrence Sites Following Adjuvant or Salvage Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer Patients. Front Oncol 2022; 11:787347. [PMID: 35070993 PMCID: PMC8766670 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.787347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Although salvage and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) are effective in prostate cancer (PC) patients, 30%–40% of men will have disease progression. The objective was to describe the pattern of recurrence in PC patients with biochemical failure (BF) following postoperative RT. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 935 PC patients treated from 2009 to 2019 with adjuvant or salvage RT at the Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest. Of these, 205 (22%) developed BF of whom 166 underwent imaging. Patients with identified radiologic failure prior any specific treatment were included to determine the site of relapse categorized as local (L)-only, locoregional (LR), or metastatic (M) recurrence. Main disease characteristics and RT fields were examined in relation to sites of recurrence. Results One hundred forty-one patients were identified with 244 sites of failure on imaging. Of these, 108 patients had received RT to the PB alone and 33 RT to the PB and pelvic lymph nodes (PB+PLN). Androgen-deprivation therapy was used concomitantly in 50 patients (35%). The median PSA at imaging was 1.6 ng/ml (range, 0–86.7). In all, 74 patients (52%) had M disease (44% in the PB group and 79% in the PB+PLN group), 61 (43%) had LR failure (52% in the PB alone group and 15% in the PB+PLN group), and six (4%) had L-only failure, at a median of 26.7 months (range, 5–110.3) from RT. Metastases were in extra-pelvic LN (37 (15%)), bones (66 (27%)), and visceral organs (eight (3%)). Fifty-three (48%) of the pelvic LN failures in the PB group would have been encompassed by standard PLN RT volume. Conclusion We found that most patients evaluated for BF after postoperative RT recurred outside the RT field. Isolated pelvic nodal failure was rare in those receiving RT to the PB+PLN but accounted for half of failures in those receiving PB alone RT. Imaging directed salvage treatment could be helpful to personalize radiation therapy plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Gonzalez-Moya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France
| | - Valérie Seegers
- Department of Medical Biostatistics, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France
| | - Thibaut Lizée
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jean Bernard Center, Inter-Regional Institute of Oncology, Le Mans, France
| | - Florence Legouté
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Center, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - Tanguy Perennec
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France
| | - Gilles Calais
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Center, Tours, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Is Associated with Improved Oncological Outcome in Men Treated with Salvage Radiation Therapy for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 5:146-152. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
30
|
Comparing the diagnostic performance of radiotracers in prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:7374-7385. [PMID: 35486169 PMCID: PMC9668945 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08802-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically assess the early detection rate of biochemical prostate cancer recurrence using choline, fluciclovine, and PSMA. METHODS Under the guidance of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis Diagnostic Test Accuracy guidelines, literature that assessed the detection rates (DRs) of choline, fluciclovine, and PSMA in prostate cancer biochemical recurrence was searched in PubMed and EMBASE databases for our systematic review from 2012 to July 15, 2021. In addition, the PSA-stratified performance of detection positivity was obtained to assess the DRs for various methods, including fluciclovine, PSMA, or choline PET/CT, with respect to biochemical recurrence based on different PSA levels. RESULTS In total, 64 studies involving 11,173 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of the studies, 12, 7, and 48 focused on choline, fluciclovine, and PSMA, respectively. The pooled DRs were 24%, 37%, and 44%, respectively, for a PSA level less than 0.5 ng/mL (p < 0.001); 36%, 44%, and 60% for a PSA level of 0.5-0.99 ng/mL (p < 0.001); and 50%, 61%, and 80% for a PSA level of 1.0-1.99 ng/mL (p < 0.001). The DR with 18F-labeled PSMA was higher than that with 68Ga-labeled PSMA, and the DR was 58%, 72%, and 88% for PSA levels < 0.5 ng/mL, 0.5-0.9 ng/mL, and 1.0-1.99 ng/mL, respectively. CONCLUSION The DRs of PSMA-radiotracers were greater than those of choline-radiotracers and fluciclovine-radiotracers at the patient level. 18F-labeled PSMA achieved a higher DR than 68Ga-labeled PSMA. KEY POINTS • The DRs of PSMA-radiotracers were greater than those of choline-radiotracers and fluciclovine-radiotracers at the patient level. • 18F-labeled PSMA achieved a higher DR than 68Ga-labeled PSMA.
Collapse
|
31
|
Artigas C, Diamand R, Shagera QA, Plouznikoff N, Fokoue F, Otte FX, Gil T, Peltier A, Van Gestel D, Flamen P. Oligometastatic Disease Detection with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients (HSPC) with Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy: Predictive Factors and Clinical Impact. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194982. [PMID: 34638466 PMCID: PMC8508549 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) in oligometastatic prostate cancer has the potential of delaying the start of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and disease progression. We aimed to analyze the efficacy of PSMA-PET/CT in detecting oligometastatic disease (OMD), to look for predictive factors of OMD, and to evaluate the impact of PSMA-PET/CT findings on clinical management. We retrospectively analyzed a homogeneous population of 196 hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients (HSPC), considered potential candidates for MDT, with a PSMA-PET/CT performed at biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed based on several clinico-pathological factors. Changes in clinical management before and after PSMA-PET/CT were analyzed. The OMD detection rate was 44% for a total positivity rate of 60%. PSMA-PET/CT positivity was independently related to PSA (OR (95% CI), p) (1.7 (1.3-2.3), p < 0.0001) and PSAdt (0.4 (0.2-0.8), p = 0.013), and OMD detection was independently related to PSA (1.6 (1.2-2.2), p = 0.001) and no previous salvage therapy (0.3 (0.1-0.9), p = 0.038). A treatment change was observed in 58% of patients, mostly to perform MDT after OMD detection (60% of changes). This study showed that PSMA-PET/CT is an excellent imaging technique to detect OMD early in HSPC patients with BCR after RP, changing therapeutic management mostly into MDT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Artigas
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1000 Brussels, Belgium; (Q.A.S.); (F.F.); (P.F.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +32-2-541-32-40
| | - Romain Diamand
- Department of Urology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1000 Brussels, Belgium; (R.D.); (A.P.)
| | - Qaid Ahmed Shagera
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1000 Brussels, Belgium; (Q.A.S.); (F.F.); (P.F.)
| | - Nicolas Plouznikoff
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada;
| | - Fabrice Fokoue
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1000 Brussels, Belgium; (Q.A.S.); (F.F.); (P.F.)
| | - François-Xavier Otte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1000 Brussels, Belgium; (F.-X.O.); (D.V.G.)
| | - Thierry Gil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1000 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Alexandre Peltier
- Department of Urology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1000 Brussels, Belgium; (R.D.); (A.P.)
| | - Dirk Van Gestel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1000 Brussels, Belgium; (F.-X.O.); (D.V.G.)
| | - Patrick Flamen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1000 Brussels, Belgium; (Q.A.S.); (F.F.); (P.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Exosomes as A Next-Generation Diagnostic and Therapeutic Tool in Prostate Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms221810131. [PMID: 34576294 PMCID: PMC8465219 DOI: 10.3390/ijms221810131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have brought great momentum to the non-invasive liquid biopsy procedure for the detection, characterization, and monitoring of cancer. Despite the common use of PSA (prostate-specific antigen) as a biomarker for prostate cancer, there is an unmet need for a more specific diagnostic tool to detect tumor progression and recurrence. Exosomes, which are EVs that are released from all cells, play a large role in physiology and pathology, including cancer. They are involved in intercellular communication, immune function, and they are present in every bodily fluid studied—making them an excellent window into how cells are operating. With liquid biopsy, EVs can be isolated and analyzed, enabling an insight into a potential therapeutic value, serving as a vehicle for drugs or nucleic acids that have anti-neoplastic effects. The current application of advanced technology also points to higher-sensitivity detection methods that are minimally invasive. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of the significance of exosomes in prostate cancer and the potential diagnostic value of these EVs in disease progression.
Collapse
|
33
|
Lawal IO, Lengana T, Popoola GO, Orunmuyi AT, Kgatle MM, Mokoala KMG, Sathekge MM. Pattern of Prostate Cancer Recurrence Assessed by 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Men Treated with Primary Local Therapy. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10173883. [PMID: 34501331 PMCID: PMC8432125 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10173883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Imaging plays a vital role in detecting the recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) to guide the choice of salvage therapy. Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT) is useful for detecting PCa recurrence. We assessed the pattern of PCa recurrence stratified by serum prostate-specific antigen level and type of primary local treatment in men with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary local therapy with radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. We reviewed patients imaged with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for the localization of the site of PCa recurrence. We determined the site and number of lesions due to PCa recurrence at different PSA levels. A total of 247 men (mean age of 65.72 ± 7.51 years and median PSA of 2.70 ng/mL (IQR = 0.78–5.80)) were included. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detected the site of recurrence in 81.4% of patients with a median number of lesions per patient of 1 (range = 1–5). 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT positivity was 43.6%, 75.7%, 83.3%, 90.0%, and 95.8% at PSA levels of <0.5, 0.5–1.0., 1.1–2.0, 2.1–5.0, and 5.0–10.0, respectively. The most common site of recurrence was in the prostate gland/bed at all PSA levels. Pelvic, extra-pelvic, and combined pelvic and extra-pelvic sites of recurrence were seen in 118, 50, and 33 patients, respectively. The risk of extra-pelvic recurrence increases with rising PSA levels. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT has a high lesion detection rate for biochemical recurrence of PCa in patients previously treated with primary local therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismaheel O. Lawal
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa; (I.O.L.); (T.L.); (M.M.K.); (K.M.G.M.)
- Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure (NuMeRI), Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
| | - Thabo Lengana
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa; (I.O.L.); (T.L.); (M.M.K.); (K.M.G.M.)
| | - Gbenga O. Popoola
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Ilorin, Ilorin 240102, Nigeria;
| | | | - Mankgopo M. Kgatle
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa; (I.O.L.); (T.L.); (M.M.K.); (K.M.G.M.)
- Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure (NuMeRI), Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
| | - Kgomotso M. G. Mokoala
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa; (I.O.L.); (T.L.); (M.M.K.); (K.M.G.M.)
- Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure (NuMeRI), Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
| | - Mike M. Sathekge
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa; (I.O.L.); (T.L.); (M.M.K.); (K.M.G.M.)
- Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure (NuMeRI), Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +27-12-354-1794
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Carthon B, Sibold HC, Blee S, D. Pentz R. Prostate Cancer: Community Education and Disparities in Diagnosis and Treatment. Oncologist 2021; 26:537-548. [PMID: 33683758 PMCID: PMC8265358 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer remains the leading diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of death among American men. Despite improvements in screening modalities, diagnostics, and treatment, disparities exist among Black men in this country. The primary objective of this systematic review is to describe the reported disparities in screening, diagnostics, and treatments as well as efforts to alleviate these disparities through community and educational outreach efforts. Critical review took place of retrospective, prospective, and socially descriptive data of English language publications in the PubMed database. Despite more advanced presentation, lower rates of screening and diagnostic procedures, and low rates of trial inclusion, subanalyses have shown that various modalities of therapy are quite effective in Black populations. Moreover, patients treated on prospective clinical trials and within equal-access care environments have shown similar outcomes regardless of race. Additional prospective studies and enhanced participation in screening, diagnostic and genetic testing, clinical trials, and community-based educational endeavors are important to ensure equitable progress in prostate cancer for all patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Notable progress has been made with therapeutic advances for prostate cancer, but racial disparities continue to exist. Differing rates in screening and utility in diagnostic procedures play a role in these disparities. Black patients often present with more advanced disease, higher prostate-specific antigen, and other adverse factors, but outcomes can be attenuated in trials or in equal-access care environments. Recent data have shown that multiple modalities of therapy are quite effective in Black populations. Novel and bold hypotheses to increase inclusion in clinical trial, enhance decentralized trial efforts, and enact successful models of patient navigation and community partnership are vital to ensure continued progress in prostate cancer disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Shannon Blee
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Corrao G, Zaffaroni M, Bergamaschi L, Augugliaro M, Volpe S, Pepa M, Bonizzi G, Pece S, Amodio N, Mistretta FA, Luzzago S, Musi G, Alessi S, La Fauci FM, Tordonato C, Tosoni D, Cattani F, Gandini S, Petralia G, Pravettoni G, De Cobelli O, Viale G, Orecchia R, Marvaso G, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Exploring miRNA Signature and Other Potential Biomarkers for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Characterization: The Biological Challenge behind Clinical Practice. A Narrative Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13133278. [PMID: 34208918 PMCID: PMC8267686 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13133278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The oligometastatic prostate cancer state is defined as the presence of a number of lesions ≤ 5 and has been significantly correlated with better survival if compared to a number of metastases > 5. In particular, patients in an oligometastatic setting could benefit from a metastates directed therapy, which could control the disease delaying the start of systemic therapies. For this reason, the selection of true-oligometastatic patients who could benefit from such approach is particularly important in this setting. The aim of the present narrative review is to report the current state of the art on the liquid biopsy-derived analytes and their reliability as biomarkers in the clinics for the identification of true-oligometastatic patients. This kind of molecular profiling could refine current developments in the era of precision oncology allowing patients’ stratification and leading to more refined therapeutic strategies. Abstract In recent years, a growing interest has been directed towards oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC), as patients with three to five metastatic lesions have shown a significantly better survival as compared with those harboring a higher number of lesions. The efficacy of local ablative treatments directed on metastatic lesions (metastases-directed treatments) was extensively investigated, with the aim of preventing further disease progression and delaying the start of systemic androgen deprivation therapies. Definitive diagnosis of prostate cancer is traditionally based on histopathological analysis. Nevertheless, a bioptic sample—static in nature—inevitably fails to reflect the dynamics of the tumor and its biological response due to the dynamic selective pressure of cancer therapies, which can profoundly influence spatio-temporal heterogeneity. Furthermore, even with new imaging technologies allowing an increasingly early detection, the diagnosis of oligometastasis is currently based exclusively on radiological investigations. Given these premises, the development of minimally-invasive liquid biopsies was recently promoted and implemented as predictive biomarkers both for clinical decision-making at pre-treatment (baseline assessment) and for monitoring treatment response during the clinical course of the disease. Through liquid biopsy, different biomarkers, commonly extracted from blood, urine or saliva, can be characterized and implemented in clinical routine to select targeted therapies and assess treatment response. Moreover, this approach has the potential to act as a tissue substitute and to accelerate the identification of novel and consistent predictive analytes cost-efficiently. However, the utility of tumor profiling is currently limited in OMPC due to the lack of clinically validated predictive biomarkers. In this scenario, different ongoing trials, such as the RADIOSA trial, might provide additional insights into the biology of the oligometastatic state and on the identification of novel biomarkers for the outlining of true oligometastatic patients, paving the way towards a wider ideal approach of personalized medicine. The aim of the present narrative review is to report the current state of the art on the solidity of liquid biopsy-related analytes such as CTCs, cfDNA, miRNA and epi-miRNA, and to provide a benchmark for their further clinical implementation. Arguably, this kind of molecular profiling could refine current developments in the era of precision oncology and lead to more refined therapeutic strategies in this subset of oligometastatic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Corrao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (M.Z.); (L.B.); (S.V.); (M.P.); (G.M.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (M.Z.); (L.B.); (S.V.); (M.P.); (G.M.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Luca Bergamaschi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (M.Z.); (L.B.); (S.V.); (M.P.); (G.M.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
| | - Matteo Augugliaro
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (M.Z.); (L.B.); (S.V.); (M.P.); (G.M.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Stefania Volpe
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (M.Z.); (L.B.); (S.V.); (M.P.); (G.M.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
| | - Matteo Pepa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (M.Z.); (L.B.); (S.V.); (M.P.); (G.M.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Giuseppina Bonizzi
- Department of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Salvatore Pece
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
- Novel Diagnostics Program, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Nicola Amodio
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy;
| | | | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (F.A.M.); (S.L.)
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
- Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (F.A.M.); (S.L.)
| | - Sarah Alessi
- Division of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Francesco Maria La Fauci
- Unit of Medical Physics IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (F.M.L.F.); (F.C.)
| | - Chiara Tordonato
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
- Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Daniela Tosoni
- Novel Diagnostics Program, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
- Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (F.M.L.F.); (F.C.)
| | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
- Division of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
- Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (F.A.M.); (S.L.)
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
- Department of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Direction, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (M.Z.); (L.B.); (S.V.); (M.P.); (G.M.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (M.Z.); (L.B.); (S.V.); (M.P.); (G.M.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Davies A, Foo M, Gan CL, Kourambas J, Redgrave N, Donnellan S, Appu S, Williams S, Coleman A, Segelov E, Bradley J, Soo G, Ramdave S, Kwan EM, Azad AA. 68 Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT as a clinical decision-making tool in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2021; 18:e204-e210. [PMID: 34161628 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE PSMA PET/CT has demonstrated superior sensitivity over conventional imaging in the detection of local and distant recurrence in biochemically relapsed (BCR) prostate cancer. We prospectively investigated the management impact of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging in men with BCR, with the aim of identifying baseline clinicopathological predictors for management change. PATIENTS AND METHODS Men with BCR who met eligibility criteria underwent 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT at Monash Health (Melbourne, Australia). Intended management plans were prospectively documented before and after 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential clinicopathological predictors of management change. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the nature of these changes. RESULTS Seventy men underwent 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging. Median age was 67 years (IQR 63-72) and median PSA was 0.48 ng/ml (IQR 0.21-1.9). PSMA-avid disease was observed in 56% (39/70) of patients. Pre-scan management plan was altered following scanning in 43% (30/70) of patients. Management changes were significantly more common in patients with higher baseline PSA levels (PSA≥2 ng/ml, p = 0.01). 18/36 (50%) of the patients initially planned for watchful waiting had their management changed, including the use of salvage pelvic radiotherapy (n = 7) and stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy to oligometastatic disease (n = 6). CONCLUSION Management change after 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT for BCR is common and typically resulted in treatment intensification strategies in those planned for a watchful waiting approach. This study adds to the growing pool of evidence supporting the clinical utility of PSMA PET/CT imaging in the care of patients with BCR after definitive therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Davies
- Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marcus Foo
- GenesisCare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Chun Loo Gan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Tom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - John Kourambas
- Department of Urology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicholas Redgrave
- Department of Urology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Scott Donnellan
- Department of Urology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sree Appu
- Department of Surgery, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Scott Williams
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Coleman
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eva Segelov
- Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jason Bradley
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Geoffrey Soo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shakher Ramdave
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Edmond M Kwan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Arun A Azad
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bottke D, Miksch J, Thamm R, Krohn T, Bartkowiak D, Beer M, Bolenz C, Beer AJ, Prasad V, Wiegel T. Changes of Radiation Treatment Concept Based on 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT in Early PSA-Recurrences After Radical Prostatectomy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:665304. [PMID: 34141618 PMCID: PMC8204009 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.665304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) is the main potentially curative treatment option for prostate cancer patients with post-prostatectomy PSA progression. Improved diagnostics by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can lead to adjustments in treatment procedures (e.g. target volume of radiotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy). We analyzed the impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT on the target volume in early biochemical recurrence (PSA up to 0.5 ng/ml). Patients and Methods We retrospectively analyzed 76 patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in whom SRT was planned after 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT. All patients had a PSA ≤0.5 ng/ml. An experienced radiation oncologist determined the radiotherapy concept, first with consideration of the PET/CT, second hypothetically based on the clinical and pathological features excluding PET/CT results. Results Without considering the PET/CT, all 76 patients would have been assigned to RT, 60 (79%) to the bed of the prostate and seminal vesicles alone, and 16 (21%) also to the pelvic lymph nodes because of histopathologic risk factors. Uptake indicative for tumor recurrence in 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT was found in 54% of the patients. The median pre-PET/CT PSA level was 0.245 ng/ml (range 0.07-0.5 ng/ml). The results of the PET/CT led to a change in the radiotherapeutic target volume in 21 patients (28%). There were major changes in the target volume including the additional irradiation of lymph nodes or the additional or exclusive irradiation of bone metastases in 13 patients (17%). Minor changes including the additional irradiation of original seminal vesicle (base) position resulted in eight patients (11%). Conclusion Using 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT for radiation planning, a change in the treatment concept was indicated in 28% of patients. With PET/CT, the actual extent of the tumor can be precisely determined even with PSA values of ≤0.5 ng/ml. Thus, the treatment concept can be improved and individualized. This may have a positive impact on progression free survival. Our results warrant further prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Bottke
- Xcare Praxis für Strahlentherapie, Trier, Germany
| | - Jonathan Miksch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Reinhard Thamm
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Detlef Bartkowiak
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Meinrad Beer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Ambros J Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Vikas Prasad
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
|
39
|
Timm B, Farag M, Liodakis P, Angus D, Lim Joon D, Bolton D. Vesico-urethral anastomosis sampling: a forgotten tool for guiding salvage radiation after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2021; 127 Suppl 1:23-29. [PMID: 33973332 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the utility of vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA)-directed biopsy in the setting of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa) in patients who have undergone evaluation by gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography with computed tomography (68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT). METHODS We completed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained dataset from January 2015 to August 2020. Patient demographics were recorded for those who experienced BCR, as defined by a rise in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level to above 0.2 ng/mL, who had a 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT that did not demonstrate recurrence within the prostate bed, and who subsequently underwent a transperineal ultrasonography (TPUS)-guided biopsy directed at the VUA. Histological reporting of the biopsies was undertaken in order to determine whether the benefits of salvage radiation therapy (SRT) could be justified by the presence of cancer cells. RESULTS Eighteen patients who had a 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and underwent VUA-directed biopsy were identified as having BCR. 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans demonstrated avidity at the VUA in none of the patients, although two out of 18 patients showed avidity in the seminal vesicles and two out of 18 patients showed avidity within regional lymph nodes. Histology from the TPUS-guided, VUA-directed biopsies demonstrated no prostatic tissue in six out of 18 and presence of prostatic tissue in 12 out of 18 of patients, respectively. In 7 out of 18 cases, there was histological evidence of recurrent PCa at the VUA in the absence of a positive 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan. CONCLUSION This study highlights the potential value of VUA-directed biopsy. We are reminded that a negative 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT does not exclude local recurrence and that the addition of a VUA-directed biopsy may aid in the decision-making process for patients with BCR following RP, especially when 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT is locally negative. When the result of both 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and VUA-directed biopsy are negative, it should encourage clinicians to share decision-making in regard to undertaking SRT vs continuing BCR surveillance. This may delay the possible side effects associated with SRT, despite its excellent PSA failure-free survival rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brennan Timm
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia.,North Eastern Urology, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia
| | - Matthew Farag
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia
| | - Peter Liodakis
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia.,North Eastern Urology, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia
| | - David Angus
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia.,North Eastern Urology, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia
| | - Daryl Lim Joon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
| | - Damien Bolton
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) is a valuable imaging in evaluating many malignancies. There are various molecular imaging tracers that are currently being utilized with prostate cancer (PC). Several PET agents imaging different molecular processes in PC have reached the clinic. While all of these agents have demonstrated an advantage over conventional imaging, there are considerable differences in the performance of each in staging newly diagnosed PC. In this article, we review the current updates available of different PET tracers, with a strong focus on the emerging role of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET in the management of newly diagnosed PC.
Collapse
|
41
|
Matushita CS, da Silva AMM, Schuck PN, Bardisserotto M, Piant DB, Pereira JL, Cerci JJ, Coura-Filho GB, Esteves FP, Amorim BJ, Gomes GV, Brito AET, Bernardo WM, Mundstock E, Fanti S, Macedo B, Roman DH, Tem-Pass CS, Hochhegger B. 68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (psma) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol 2021; 47:705-729. [PMID: 33566470 PMCID: PMC8321470 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in males. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, a non-invasive diagnostic tool to evaluate PC with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression, has emerged as a more accurate alternative to assess disease staging. We aimed to identify predictors of positive 68Ga-PSMA PET and the accuracy of this technique. Materials and methods: Diagnostic accuracy cross-sectional study with prospective and retrospective approaches. We performed a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase database in search of studies including PC patients submitted to radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy with curative intent and presented biochemical recurrence following ASTRO 1996 criteria. A total of 35 studies involving 3910 patients submitted to 68-Ga-PSMA PET were included and independently assessed by two authors: 8 studies on diagnosis, four on staging, and 23 studies on restaging purposes. The significance level was α=0.05. Results: pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 (0.86-0.93) and 0.90 (0.82-0.96), respectively, for diagnostic purposes; as for staging, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.93 (0.86-0.98) and 0.96 (0.92-0.99), respectively. In the restaging scenario, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 (0.74-0.78) and 0.45 (0.27-0.58), respectively, considering the identification of prostate cancer in each described situation. We also obtained specificity and sensitivity results for PSA subdivisions. Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA PET provides higher sensitivity and specificity than traditional imaging for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina S Matushita
- Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | - Ana M Marques da Silva
- Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.,Laboratório de Imagens Médicas, Faculdade de Ciências, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | - Phelipi N Schuck
- Laboratório de Imagens Médicas, Faculdade de Ciências, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | | | - Diego B Piant
- Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | | | | | - George B Coura-Filho
- Departamento de Medicina Nuclear, Instituto do Câncer de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | | | - Barbara J Amorim
- Departamento de Medicina Nuclear, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brasil
| | | | | | - Wanderley M Bernardo
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina, Faculdade de Medicina - USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Eduardo Mundstock
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde da Criança, Faculdade de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialized Medicine-DIMES, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Bruna Macedo
- Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | - Diego H Roman
- Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | - Cinthia Scatolin Tem-Pass
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde da Criança, Faculdade de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | - Bruno Hochhegger
- Instituto do Cérebro do Rio Grande do Sul, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Henkenberens C, Derlin T, Bengel F, Ross TL, Kuczyk MA, Giordano FA, Sarria GR, Schmeel LC, Christiansen H, von Klot CAJ. Efficacy of PSMA PET-Guided Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:664225. [PMID: 33954116 PMCID: PMC8089391 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.664225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the outcome of radiotherapy (RT) to all PSMA ligand positive metastases for patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Patients and methods A total of 42 patients developed oligometastatic mCRPC and received PSMA PET-guided RT of all metastases. The main outcome parameters were biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), and second-line systemic treatment free survival (SST-FS). Results A total of 141 PSMA ligand-positive metastases were irradiated. The median follow-up time was 39.0 months (12-58 months). During the follow-up five out of 42 (11.9%) patients died of progressive mPCa. Five out of 42 (11.9%) patients showed no biochemical responses and presented with a PSA level ≥10% of the baseline PSA at first PSA level measurement after RT and were classified as non-responders. The median PSA level before RT was 4.79 ng/mL (range, 0.4-46.1), which decreased significantly to a median PSA nadir level of 0.39 ng/mL (range, <0.07-32.8; p=0.002). The median PSA level at biochemical progression after PSMA ligand-based RT was 2.75 ng/mL (range, 0.27-53.0; p=0.24) and was not significantly different (p=0.29) from the median PSA level (4.79 ng/mL, range, 0.4-46.1) before the PSMA ligand-based RT. The median bPFS was 12.0 months after PSMA ligand PET-based RT (95% CI, 11.2-15.8) and the median SST-FS was 15.0 months (95% CI, 14.0-21.5). Conclusion In well-informed and closely followed-up patients, PSMA PET-guided RT represents a viable treatment option for patients with oligometastatic mCRPC to delay further systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frank Bengel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Tobias L Ross
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Markus A Kuczyk
- Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Hans Christiansen
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
von Eyben FE, Soydal C, von Eyben R. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for Patients with PSA Relapse after Radical Prostatectomy or External Beam Radiotherapy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11040622. [PMID: 33808350 PMCID: PMC8066852 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11040622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The study aimed to summarize clinical characteristics associated with Gallium-68-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) scans as patients were restaged for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse after radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Our analyses included multiple cox regression analyses. The study evaluated 95 patients with rising values of PSAs after RP and after EBRT. Sixty 63% of patients had a positive 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan. Twelve patients (13%) had a positive site in the prostate bed, 29 patients (30%) had a positive site in the regional lymph nodes, and 19 (20%) had positive sites in distant organs. After four years follow-up, 21 patients (22%) died. Using multiple Cox regression analyses, the number of positive sites on the 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan significantly predicted overall survival (OS) (p = 0.0001), whereas risk score and regional locations of the positive sites were not significant in the multiple Cox regression analyses. Our study indicates that the specific findings of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans are important because detailed findings of the scans predict the outcome after salvage treatment of patients with PSA relapse examined with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cigdem Soydal
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara University, 06560 Ankara, Turkey;
| | - Rie von Eyben
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94350, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Adaptive sequential plan-on-plan optimization during prostate-specific antigen response guided radiotherapy of recurrent prostate cancer. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2021; 18:5-10. [PMID: 34258401 PMCID: PMC8254191 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2021.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Treatment adaptation based on tumour biomarker response during radiotherapy of prostate cancer, could be used for both escalation and de-escalation of radiation doses and volumes. To execute an adaptation involving extension of treatment volumes during radiation can however be restricted by the doses already delivered. The aim of this work was to develop a treatment planning method that addresses this challenge. Material and methods A volumetric-modulated-arc-therapy (VMAT) planning method with sequential plan-on-plan optimization was developed for a prospective phase II trial including 100 patients on salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for prostate cancer recurrence. A treatment adaptation was performed after five weeks of SRT based on prostate-specific antigen response during this phase of the treatment. This involved extension of treatment volumes for non-responders (n = 64) to include pelvic lymph nodes and boost to 68Gallium-Prostate-Specific-Membrane-Antigen-Positron-Emission-Tomography positive lesions. This method was evolved by introducing an EQD2 (equivalent dose in 2.0 Gy fractions) correction of the base plan for improved dose coverage. Results All dose-volume criteria for target coverage were met for the non-responders when based on physical dose. An EQD2 correction of the base plan for non-responders, implemented for the final 29 patients, led to a statistically significant improvement in dose coverage as compared to the 35 patients treated without EQD2 correction. Conclusions This is to our knowledge the only study presented on biomarker-guided sequential VMAT radiotherapy using a plan-on-plan technique in the pelvis. By using a biologically adapted technique an improved target coverage was achieved without compromising doses to organs at risk.
Collapse
|
45
|
Keegan NM, Bodei L, Morris MJ. Seek and Find: Current Prospective Evidence for Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Imaging to Detect Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 7:267-278. [PMID: 33744163 PMCID: PMC8371443 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Men with biochemically relapsed prostate cancer face a clinical conundrum. Depending on the detected distribution of disease, treatment goals may range from cure with focal therapy to palliative with systemic therapy to expectant observation. Retrospective studies of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based imaging demonstrate higher disease detection rates than conventional imaging. OBJECTIVE This review focuses on available prospective evidence for diagnostic use of PSMA-based imaging to accurately restage recurrent prostate cancer and explores the potential clinical impact, near future uses, and challenges for PSMA-based imaging in this setting. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for prospective studies with primary, secondary, or exploratory endpoints evaluating PSMA-based imaging for patients with recurrent prostate cancer published in English in the past 10 yrs. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We reviewed 48 prospective studies evaluating the role of PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) in recurrent prostate cancer. These studies establish the diagnostic accuracy and safety of PSMA PET using the 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-DCFPyL radiotracers even at lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (0.5 ≤ PSA < 1.0 ng/m: disease detection rate 51-78%). The use of PSMA PET has been shown to result in changes in management in up to two-thirds of patients. CONCLUSIONS There is now higher-level regulatory-quality prospective evidence for PSMA-based imaging for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer. There is prospective evidence of superiority over cross-sectional imaging and bone scintigraphy, as well as for the alterations in disease management as a result of PSMA-based imaging. PATIENT SUMMARY When the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level is rising after primary therapy, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) is excellent at detecting and localizing prostate cancer, even at low PSA levels. Those who benefit best from treatment modifications based on PSMA PET findings are yet to be defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niamh M Keegan
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lisa Bodei
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael J Morris
- Genitourinary Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Liu A, Zhang M, Huang H, Zhang C, Ruan X, Lin W, Li B, Chen L, Xu D. Clinical Utility of 18F-PSMA-1007 Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Single-Center Experience. Front Oncol 2021; 10:612701. [PMID: 33680933 PMCID: PMC7928386 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.612701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of 18F-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography (PSMA PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging in patients with suspected or defined prostate cancer. Methods In the pilot study, we retrospectively investigated 62 patients who underwent PSMA-PET/MRI for suspected or defined PCa between June 2019 and June 2020. Patients were grouped into three subgroups: (1) suspected PCa without histological evidence, (2) primary PCa, (3) biochemical recurrent prostate cancer (BRPCa). Two nuclear physicians independently interpreted the results of PSMA-PET/MRI. Management strategies before PSMA-PET/MRI were retrospectively reported, and the management strategy was re-evaluated for each patient considering the PSMA-PET/MRI result. The changes in strategies were recorded. Besides, the correlation between prostate specific antigen (PSA) level and management changes was also accessed by Fisher exact test, and two-side p < 0.05 was assumed as statistical significance. Results There were 28 patients in the suspected PCa group (group 1), 12 in the primary PCa group (group 2), and 22 in the BRPCa group (group 3). Overall, the intended decisions were changed in 26 (41.9%) of 62 patients after PSMA-PET/MRI, including 11/28 (39.3%) in suspected PCa group, 1/12 (8.4%) in primary PCa group, and 14/24 (63.6%) in BCR group. In group 1, the main impact on subsequent management included decreased active surveillance (from 20 to 9) and increased prostate biopsy (from 8 to 19). PSA levels were not significantly associated with management changes in suspected PCa patients (p = 0.865). In group 2, the main impact on subsequent management included decreased radical surgery (from 8 to 7), and multimodal therapy appearance (n = 1). Only in the category of PSA levels of ≥20 ng/ml, the management of primary PCa was changed. In group 3, the main impact on subsequent management included decreased salvage radiotherapy (from 5 to 2), increased systemic therapy (from 6 to 7), and increased multimodal therapy (from 11 to 13). The highest proportion of management changes occurred in BCR patients with 0.5≤PSA<1 ng/ml. Conclusion From our preliminary experience, PSMA-PET/MRI may be a valued tool for defining PCa lesions and changing management. The biggest impact of management intent was in patients with BRPCa, especially in patients with 0.5≤PSA<1 ng/ml. However, further studies are needed to confirm our pilot findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ao Liu
- Department of Urinary Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Miao Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hai Huang
- Department of Urinary Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chuanjie Zhang
- Department of Urinary Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaohao Ruan
- Department of Urinary Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenhao Lin
- Department of Urinary Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Biao Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Lu Chen
- Department of Urinary Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Danfeng Xu
- Department of Urinary Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Role of 18F-Fluciclovine and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT in Guiding Management of Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 216:851-859. [PMID: 33206564 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.24711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Twenty-five years ago, oligometastatic disease was proposed as an intermediary clinical state of cancer with unique implications for therapies that may impact cancer evolution and patient outcome. Identification of limited metastases that are potentially amenable to targeted therapies fundamentally depends on the sensitivity of diagnostic tools, including new-generation imaging methods. For men with biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy of the primary prostate cancer, PET/CT using either the FDA-approved radiolabeled amino acid analogue 18F-fluciclovine or investigational radiolabeled agents targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) enables identification of early metastases at lower serum PSA levels than was previously feasible using conventional imaging. Evidence supports PSMA PET/CT as the most sensitive imaging modality available for identifying disease sites in oligometastatic prostate cancer. PSMA PET/CT will likely become the modality of choice after regulatory approval and will drive the development of trials of emerging metastasis-directed therapies such as stereotactic ablative body radiation and radioguided surgery. Indeed, numerous ongoing or planned clinical trials are studying advances in management of oligometastatic prostate cancer based on this heightened diagnostic capacity. In this rapidly evolving clinical environment, radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians will play major roles in facilitating clinical decision making and management of patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
48
|
Ploussard G, Fossati N, Wiegel T, D'Amico A, Hofman MS, Gillessen S, Mottet N, Joniau S, Spratt DE. Management of Persistently Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 4:150-169. [PMID: 33574012 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The prognosis and optimal management of pN0/pN1 patients with persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 6-8 wk after radical prostatectomy (RP) remain unclear. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of oncologic outcomes and effectiveness of salvage therapies in men with a detectable PSA level after RP. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review was performed in May 2020. A total of 2374 articles were screened, and 25 studies including 5217 men were selected and included in the systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS PSA persistence was most commonly defined as PSA >0.1 ng/ml. PSA persistence was significantly correlated with disease aggressiveness and associated with worse oncologic outcomes than in men with undetectable PSA levels. The 5-yr recurrence-free survival rates varied from 21.5% to 67.0%. The ≥10-yr cancer-specific survival was 75-88%. Salvage radiotherapy ± androgen deprivation therapy was associated with improved survival outcomes. Risk stratification according to pathologic features, PSA levels/kinetics, and genomic classifier may aid in personalization of treatment. The usefulness of molecular imaging in this setting remains underevaluated. Main limitations of this systematic review are the retrospective design of the included studies and the lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on this specific population. CONCLUSIONS PSA persistence after RP is strongly correlated with poor oncologic outcomes. Our review suggests a benefit from immediate radiotherapy; however, current evidence is still low. Indication of subsequent therapies should be based on individual discussions, taking into account all the prognostic factors and the efficacy/toxicity imbalance of proposed treatment. Results from ongoing RCTs are awaited to state on the role of more intensified systemic therapy in this population. PATIENT SUMMARY Patients with a detectable prostate-specific antigen level after surgery are at high risk of subsequent progression. Immediate radiotherapy might improve survival outcomes. Further research into the role of molecular imaging and genomic classifier is needed in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Toulouse, France and Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Anthony D'Amico
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence (ProsTIC), Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Department of Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Nicolas Mottet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, St. Etienne, France
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Young S, Liu W, Zukotynski K, Bauman G. Prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted PET/CT for recurrent prostate cancer: a clinician's guide. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2021; 21:641-655. [PMID: 33476253 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2021.1878883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION PSMA-targeted PET/CT is a 'Next Generation Imaging' technique with superior sensitivity and specificity for detecting recurrent prostate cancer compared with conventional imaging, allowing more accurate staging and re-staging. AREAS COVERED This article reviews the role of PSMA-targeted PET/CT in clinical management of men with recurrent prostate cancer. EXPERT OPINION Through enhanced spatial characterization of recurrent prostate cancer, PSMA-targeted PET/CT has shown significant impact on management decisions. In particular, by identifying men with recurrence confined to the prostate or pelvic nodes, PSMA-targeted PET/CT enables selective deployment of localized salvage therapies for management of biochemical failure after primary treatment with prostatectomy or radiotherapy. In oligometastatic disease, PSMA-targeted PET/CT may improve patient selection and treatment accuracy for metastasis-directed therapy and early phase II studies show encouraging results in delaying the need for systemic therapy. Further, quantitative PSMA-targeted PET/CT for monitoring response and therapeutic PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals are emerging as encouraging treatment options in the setting of castrate-resistant disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sympascho Young
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Glenn Bauman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Chevalme YM, Boudali L, Gauthé M, Rousseau C, Skanjeti A, Merlin C, Robin P, Giraudet AL, Janier M, Talbot JN. Survey by the French Medicine Agency (ANSM) of the imaging protocol, detection rate, and safety of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in the biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer in case of negative or equivocal 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT: 1084 examinations. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:2935-2950. [PMID: 33416958 PMCID: PMC8263442 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05086-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Despite growing evidence of a superior diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 over 18F-fluorocholine (FCH) PET/CT, the number of PET/CT centres able to label on site with gallium-68 is still currently limited. Therefore, patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer frequently undergo FCH as the 1st-line PET/CT. Actually, the positivity rate (PR) of a second-line PSMA-11 PET/CT in case of negative FCH PET/CT has only been reported in few short series, in a total of 185 patients. Our aims were to check (1) whether the excellent PR reported with PSMA-11 is also obtained in BCR patients whose recent FCH PET/CT was negative or equivocal; (2) in which biochemical and clinical context a high PSMA-11 PET/CT PR may be expected in those patients, in particular revealing an oligometastatic pattern; (3) whether among the various imaging protocols for PSMA-11 PET/CT used in France, one yields a significantly highest PR; (4) the tolerance of PSMA-11. Patients and methods Six centres performed 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CTs during the first 3 years of its use in France. Prior to each PET/CT, the patient’s data were submitted prospectively for authorisation to ANSM, the French Medicine Agency. The on-site readings of 1084 PSMA-11 PET/CTs in BCR patients whose recent FCH PET/CTs resulted negative or equivocal were pooled and analysed. Results (1) The overall PR was 68%; for a median serum PSA level (sPSA) of 1.7 ng/mL, an oligometastatic pattern (1–3 foci) was observed in 31% of the cases overall; (2) PR was significantly related to sPSA (from 41% if < 0.2 ng/mL to 81% if ≥ 2 ng/mL), to patients’ age, to initial therapy (64% if prostatectomy vs. 85% without prostatectomy due to frequent foci in the prostate fossa), to whether FCH PET/CT was negative or equivocal (PR = 62% vs. 82%), and to previous BCR (PR = 63% for 1st BCR vs. 72% in case of previous BCR); (3) no significant difference in PR was found according to the imaging protocol: injected activity, administration of a contrast agent and/or of furosemide, dose length product, one single or multiple time points of image acquisition; (4) no adverse event was reported after PSMA-11 injection, even associated with a contrast agent and/or furosemide. Conclusion Compared with the performance of PSMA-11 PET/CT in BCR reported independently of FCH PET/CT in 6 large published series (n > 200), the selection based on FCH PET/CT resulted in no difference of PSMA-11 PR for sPSA < 1 ng/mL but in a slightly lower PR for sPSA ≥ 1 ng/mL, probably because FCH performs rather well at this sPSA and very occult BCR was over-represented in our cohort. An oligometastatic pattern paving the way to targeted therapy was observed in one fourth to one third of the cases, according to the clinico-biochemical context of the BCR. Systematic dual or triple acquisition time points or administration of a contrast agent and/or furosemide did not bring a significant added value for PSMA-11 PET/CT positivity and should be decided on individual bases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanna-Marina Chevalme
- Direction des médicaments en oncologie, hématologie, transplantation, néphrologie, thérapie cellulaire, produits sanguins, et radiopharmaceutiques, Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des produits de santé (ANSM), 143 Bd Anatole, F93200, St Denis, France.
| | - Lotfi Boudali
- Direction des médicaments en oncologie, hématologie, transplantation, néphrologie, thérapie cellulaire, produits sanguins, et radiopharmaceutiques, Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des produits de santé (ANSM), 143 Bd Anatole, F93200, St Denis, France
| | - Mathieu Gauthé
- Service de médecine nucléaire, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Caroline Rousseau
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ICO René Gauducheau, CNRS, Inserm, CRCINA, Nantes University, F-44000, Nantes, France
| | - Andrea Skanjeti
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, EA 3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Charles Merlin
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Cancer Center Jean PERRIN, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Philippe Robin
- Service de Médecine Nucléaire, EA 3878 (GETBO), Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Brest, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France
| | | | - Marc Janier
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, EA 3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.,Comité permanent de l'ANSM, Médicaments de diagnostic et de médecine nucléaire, St Denis, France
| | - Jean-Noël Talbot
- Service de médecine nucléaire, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Comité permanent de l'ANSM, Médicaments de diagnostic et de médecine nucléaire, St Denis, France
| |
Collapse
|