A prospective and randomised trial comparing fluoroscopic, total ultrasonographic, and combined guidance for renal access in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Comparison of 24-hour urine composition prior to and after stone removal in nephrolithiasis: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate 24-hour urine composition prior to and after complete stone removal in nephrolithiasis patients to determine potential relationship between kidney stones and patient metabolic status.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was performed with patient enrollment from March 2019 to August 2020. 24-hour urine samples were collected prior to stone removal and 4 weeks after double-J stent removal, and examined the following urinary parameters: volume, creatinine, sodium, calcium, uric acid, citrate, oxalate, potassium, phosphorous, magnesium, and pH value. For each parameter, pairwise t test was performed to compare samples prior to and after stone removal. The number of cases that changed from normal to abnormal or vice versa was also evaluated for each parameter. The study was registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov/ (NCT03846011).

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients completed 24-hour urine collections prior to and after stone removal. The urinary calcium and phosphate levels increased significantly after stone removal, showing a mean difference of 0.55 mmol (P=0.015) and 2.35 mmol (P=0.001) respectively. None of the other urinary parameters demonstrated a statistically significant difference when means were compared. The percentage differences for all urinary parameters ranged from 5.4% to 14.1%. The percentages of patients that presented clinically significant changes in urinary parameter values from normal to abnormal or vice versa ranged from 4.6% to 20.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Ideally, evaluation of 24-hour urine compositions should be undertaken after total stone removal, especially for patients with calcium stones. For patients who cannot achieve total stone removal, 24-hour urine samples should be thoroughly interpreted as urinary calcium and phosphate levels might be depleted in the presence of urinary stones.

Ultrasound-guided renal puncture followed by endoscopically guided tract dilatation vs standard fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy for non-opaque renal stones; a randomized clinical trial

This study was designed to evaluate the non-inferiority of ultrasound puncture followed by endoscopically guided tract dilatation compared to the standard fluoroscopy-guided PCNL. Forty patients with non-opaque kidney stones eligible for PCNL were randomly divided into two groups. The standard fluoroscopy-guided PCNL using the Amplatz dilator was performed in the XRAY group. In the SONO group, the Kidney was punctured under an ultrasound guide followed by tract dilatation using a combination of the Amplatz dilator based on the tract length and an endoscopically guided tract dilatation using a bi-prong forceps in cases of short-advancement. The primary outcome was successful access. In 90% of cases in the XRAY and 95% in the SONO group access dilatation process was performed uneventfully at the first attempt (p = 0.5). In 45% of cases in the SONO group, bi-prong forceps were used as salvage for short-advancement. In one case in the X-ray group over-advancement occurred. One month after surgery, the stone-free rate on the CT-scan was 75% for the X-ray group and 85% for the SONO group (p = 0.4). There were no significant differences in operation time, hospitalization duration, transfusion, or complication rates between the two groups. We conclude that ultrasound-guided renal puncture, followed by endoscopically guided tract dilatation can achieve a high success rate similar to X-ray-guided PCNL while avoiding the harmful effects of radiation exposure and the risk of over-advancement.

International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) guideline on staghorn calculi management

BACKGROUND

The stone burden based management strategy reported in the guidelines published by different associations is well known for a long time. Staghorn calculi, representing the largest burden and most complex stones, is one of the most challenging cases to practicing urologists in clinical practice. The International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) has released a series of guidelines on the management of urolithiasis.

PURPOSE

To develop a series of recommendations for the contemporary management management of staghorn calculi and to provide a clinical framework for urologists treating patients with these complex stones.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search for articles published in English between 01/01/1976 and 31/12/2022 in the PubMed, OVID, Embase and Medline database is performed. A series of recommendations are developed and individually graded following the review of literature and panel discussion.

RESULTS

The definition, pathogenesis, pathophysiology, preoperative evaluation, intraoperative treatment strategies and procedural advice, early postoperative management, follow up and prevention of stone recurrence are summarized in the present document.

CONCLUSION

A series of recommendations regarding the management of staghorn calculi, along with related commentary and supporting documentation offered in the present guideline is intended to provide a clinical framework for the practicing urologists in the management of staghorn calculi.

Has fluoroless endourology (URS and PCNL) come of age? Evidence from a comprehensive literature review

INTRODUCTION

Radiation via the use of imaging is a key tool in management of kidney stones. Simple measures are largely taken by the endourologists to implement the 'As Low As Reasonably Achievable' (ALARA) principle, including the use of fluoroless technique. We performed a scoping literature review to investigate the success and safety of fluoroless ureteroscopy (URS) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedures for the treatment of KSD.

METHODS

A literature review was performed searching bibliographic databases PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library, and 14 full papers were included in the review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Of the 2535 total procedures analysed, 823 were fluoroless URS vs. 556 fluoroscopic URS; and 734 fluoroless PCNL vs. 277 fluoroscopic PCNL. The SFR for fluoroless vs. fluoroscopic guided URS was 85.3% and 77%, respectively (p=0.2), while for fluoroless PCNL vs. fluoroscopic group was 83.8% and 84.6%, respectively (p=0.9). The overall Clavien-Dindo I/II and III/IV complications for fluoroless and fluoroscopic guided procedures were 3.1% (n=71) and 8.5% (n=131), and 1.7% (n=23) and 3% (n=47) respectively. Only 5 studies reported a failure of the fluoroscopic approach with a total of 30 (1.3%) failed procedures.

CONCLUSION

The ALARA protocol has been implemented in endourology in numerous ways to protect both patients and healthcare workers during recent years. Fluoroless procedures for treatment of KSD are safe and effective with outcomes comparable to standard procedures and could become the new frontier of endourology in selected cases.

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes for Fluoroscopic and Fluoroscopy-free Endourological Procedures: A Systematic Review on Behalf of the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel

CONTEXT

Endourological procedures frequently require fluoroscopic guidance, which results in harmful radiation exposure to patients and staff. One clinician-controlled method for decreasing exposure to ionising radiation in patients with urolithiasis is to avoid the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy during stone intervention procedures.

OBJECTIVE

To comparatively assess the benefits and risks of "fluoroscopy-free" and fluoroscopic endourological interventions in patients with urolithiasis.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review of the literature from 1970 to 2022 was performed using the MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane controlled trials databases and ClinicalTrials.gov. Primary outcomes assessed were complications and the stone-free rate (SFR). Studies reporting data on ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) were eligible for inclusion. Secondary outcomes were operative duration, hospital length of stay, conversion from a fluoroscopy-free to a fluoroscopic procedure, and requirement for an auxiliary procedure to achieve stone clearance.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

In total, 24 studies (12 randomised and 12 observational) out of 834 abstracts screened were eligible for analysis. There were 4564 patients with urolithiasis in total, of whom 2309 underwent a fluoroscopy-free procedure and 2255 underwent a comparative fluoroscopic procedure for treatment of urolithiasis. Pooled analysis of all procedures revealed no significant difference between the groups in SFR (p = 0.84), operative duration (p = 0.11), or length of stay (p = 0.13). Complication rates were significantly higher in the fluoroscopy group (p = 0.009). The incidence of conversion from a fluoroscopy-free to a fluoroscopic procedure was 2.84%. Similar results were noted in subanalyses for ureteroscopy (n = 2647) and PCNL (n = 1917). When only randomised studies were analysed (n = 12), the overall complication rate was significantly in the fluoroscopy group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For carefully selected patients with urolithiasis, fluoroscopy-free and fluoroscopic endourological procedures have comparable stone-free and complication rates when performed by experienced urologists. In addition, the conversion rate from a fluoroscopy-free to a fluoroscopic endourological procedure is low at 2.84%. These findings are important for clinicians and patients, as the detrimental health effects of ionising radiation are negated with fluoroscopy-free procedures.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We compared treatments for kidney stones with and without the use of radiation. We found that kidney stone procedures without the use of radiation can be safely performed by experienced urologists in patients with normal kidney anatomy. These findings are important, as they indicate that the harmful effects of radiation can be avoided during kidney stone surgery.

2022 Recommendations of the AFU Lithiasis Committee: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Labate et al.) is the standard procedure for the treatment of large (≥2cm) kidney stones. The patient can be in prone or modified supine position. The puncture is performed under fluoroscopy and/or ultrasound guidance. The stone-free rate seems to be comparable between miniaturized and standard PCNL. Procedures performed with smaller diameter instruments tend to be associated with significant lower blood loss, but longer procedure times. The limitation of the number of percutaneous tracts results in better preservation of the kidney function and lowers the risk of complications. The use of tranexamic acid during PCNL may be interesting for reducing the bleeding risk, the transfusion rate, and possibly the intervention duration. METHODOLOGY: These recommendations were developed using two methods: the Clinical Practice Recommendation (CPR) method and the ADAPTE method, depending on whether the question was considered in the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis [EAU 2022]) and their adaptability to the French context.

Radiation exposure during different percutaneous renal puncture techniques: A YAU endourology & urolithiasis study

PURPOSE

Radiation exposure is affected by C-arm fluoroscopy device positioning during percutaneous renal puncture. Our aim was to compare the exposure of surgeon's lens, hand and chest with a fluoroscopy protocol replicated in different C-arm positions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A standardized fluoroscopy protocol was created using water-equivalent solid phantoms to replicate a surgeon and patient. 111 mGy radiation (360 s) was applied in standard fluoroscopy mode (91 kVp, 2.7 mA/mAs). Dosimeters were placed on lens, chest and hand of surgeon and patient phantom models. 7 different C-arm positions were created: 0°, mediolateral (ML) +90°, ML -90°, ML +30°, ML -15°, craniocaudal (CC) +30°, CC +15°. Measurements were evaluated separately for different positions.

RESULTS

The highest radiation exposure was measured on patient dosimeter (2.97 mSv). The highest exposure on surgeon was recorded on finger dosimeter in all C-arm positions; highest dose was recorded in ML +90° position (2.88 mSv). In finger dosimeters, lowest exposure was recorded in 0° position (0.51 mSv). The lowest exposure of all positions was measured in chest dosimeter in ML -90° position (0.24 mSv).

CONCLUSIONS

In positions where X-ray generator of the C-arm was facing towards the surgeon, radiation exposure measured in all dosimeters was higher compared to positions where the generator was facing away. The hand radiation exposure in all positions was higher than chest and lens. Special care must be taken to avoid facing the X-ray generator tube and hands should be as well-protected as chest and eyes with special protective gear.

Super-stiff guidewire or loach guidewire during percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Objectives

The objectives of this work are to compare the outcomes between loach guidewire and super-stiff guidewire during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and find potential indications of different guidewires.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively reviewed our institutional PCNL database from 2017 to 2021. Patients who underwent PCNL guided by loach guidewire were assigned to group A (489 patients); patients who received super-stiff guidewire were assigned to group B (269 patients). Preoperative demographic data, intraoperative parameters, and postoperative complications were compared. The conditions and reasons of failed placement of guidewire needed readjustment were evaluated as well.

Results

Preoperative demographic data and most intraoperative parameters were not statistically different between the groups. Postoperative Clavien-Dindo complications were also comparable, with low rate of complications. However, failed placement of guidewire more occurred in group A (8.2% vs. 4.0%, respectively, p = 0.03). Compared with the super-stiff guidewire, the loach guidewire was easier pass/slip into any place either it be perinephric or blood vessels. In most failed group A cases and all failed group B cases, the guidewire was placed in the perirenal fat. Six patients (15%) in group A, the guidewires entered into vessels.

Conclusions

Our results support that the faulty placement of loach guidewire is significantly more common compared with super-stiff guidewire. Double confirmation is needed to prevent a major complication out of wrong dilatation whenever there is doubt about the wrong location of the guidewire.

Korean Society of Endourology and Robotics (KSER) recommendation on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of urolithiasis

This article provides evidence-based recommendations and expert opinions to aid urologists in making optimal decisions regarding managing urolithiasis in various clinical scenarios. The most frequently asked questions by urologists in their clinical practice have been collected and answered in the form of FAQs; based on the latest evidence and expert opinions. The natural history of urolithiasis is divided into active treatment and silent phases, with the active treatment stage divided into typical and special situations and peri-treatment management. The authors address 28 key questions, offering practical guidance for the proper diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of urolithiasis in clinical practice. This article is expected to be served as a valuable resource for urologists.

Superselective renal arterial embolization for severe postpercutaneous nephrolithotomy haemorrhage: clinical characteristics and risk factors for initial failure

OBJECTIVE

To identify the clinical characteristics of patients who underwent superselective renal arterial embolization (SRAE) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and to explore the risk factors for failed initial SRAE after PCNL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent SRAE for severe haemorrhage following PCNL between January 2014 and December 2020 were included in the study. The clinical data of those patients and the parameters and characteristics of the perioperative PCNL and SRAE procedures were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 243 patients were included in this study. A total of 139 patients (57.2%) had a pseudoaneurysm, 25 (10.3%) had an arteriovenous fistula, 50 (20.6%) patients had both a pseudoaneurysm and an arteriovenous fistula, and 29 (11.9%) had an arterial laceration. In 177 patients with single percutaneous access, 125 (70.6%) patients exhibited nontract haemorrhage, and 55 (31.1%) patients exhibited multiple bleeding sites. In 66 patients with multiple percutaneous access, 44 (66.7%) patients exhibited nontract haemorrhage, and 32 (48.5%) patients exhibited multiple bleeding sites. The decrease in Hb before SRAE was 41.4 ± 19.8 g/L. The mean time between PCNL surgery and initial SRAE was 6.4 ± 4.9 days. Serum creatinine was increased after the SRAE procedure. Initial SRAE was successful in 229 (94.2%) patients and failed in 14 (5.8%) patients. Multivariate regression demonstrated that hydronephrosis < 20 mm, total ultrasonographic guidance, solitary kidney, previous ipsilateral renal surgery, PCNL duration > 90 min and multiple bleeding sites were potential risk factors for initial embolization failure.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous access was not the most important reason for post-PCNL severe haemorrhage. SRAE is effective for the treatment of severe haemorrhage following PCNL; however, several factors have an impact on the success of initial SRAE. Additionally, the SRAE procedure may affect renal function.

A mathematical method to estimate angle and distance for percutaneous renal puncture based on computed tomography data: Description and validation

Introduction

Gaining access to the kidney is crucial step in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL); it has a steep learning curve.

Objective

Describe the mathematical method to predict renal puncture angle and distance based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) measurements. Then evaluating how it correlates with measured values.

Patients and Methods

The study was prospectively designed. After ethical committee approval, the study uses data from preoperative CT to construct a triangle so we can estimate puncture depth and angle. A triangle of three points, the first is point of entry to the pelvicalyceal system (PCS), the second is point on the skin perpendicular to it, and the third where the needle punctures the skin. The needle travel is estimated using the Pythagorean theorem and puncture angle using the inverse sine function. We evaluated 40 punctures in 36 PCNL procedures. After PCS puncture using fluoroscopy-guided triangulation, we measured the needle travel distance and angle to the horizontal plane. Then compared the results with mathematically estimated values.

Results

We targeted posterior lower calyx in 21 (70%) case. The correlation between measured and estimated needle travel distance with Rho coefficient of 0.76 with P < 0.001. The mean difference between the estimated and the measured needle travel was - 0.37 ± 1.2 cm (-2.6-1.6). Measured and estimated angle correlate with Rho coefficient of 0.77 and P < 0.001. The mean difference between the estimated and the measured angle was 2° ± 8° (-21°-16°).

Conclusion

Mathematical estimation of needle depth and angle for gaining access to the kidney correlates well with measured values.

Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy as imaging guidance for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the outcomes of ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UG-PCNL), an alternative to traditional fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (FG-PCNL), are comparable.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was carried out to discover investigations comparing UG-PCNL to FG-PCNL, and accordingly, a meta-analysis of those studies was performed. The primary outcomes included the stone-free rate (SFR), overall complications based on Clavien-Dindo classification, duration of surgery, duration of patients' hospitalization, and hemoglobin (Hb) drop during the surgery. All statistical analyses and visualizations were implemented utilizing R software.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies, including eight randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and eleven observational cohorts, comprising 3016 patients (1521 UG-PCNL patients) and comparing UG-PCNL with FG-PCNL met the inclusion criteria of the current study. Considering SFR, overall complications, duration of surgery, duration of hospitalization, and Hb drop, our meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between UG-PCNL and FG-PCNL patients, with p-values of 0.29, 0.47, 0.98, 0.28, and 0.42, respectively. Significant differences were discovered between UG-PCNL and FG-PCNL patients in terms of the length of time they were exposed to radiation (p-value< 0.0001). Moreover, FG-PCNL had shorter access time than UG-PCNL (p-value = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

UG-PCNL provides the advantage of requiring less radiation exposure while being just as efficient as FG-PCNL; thus, this study suggests prioritizing the use of UG-PCNL.

Miniaturization in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: What is new?

Objective

To summarize recent advancements in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) in surgical technique, stone removal strategy, lithotripsy, and surgical model from the current literature.

Methods

We conducted a narrative review of relevant English-language articles up to October 2022 using the PubMed and Web of Science databases. The following keywords were used in the search: "percutaneous nephrolithotomy", "minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy", "mini-PCNL", "mini-perc", "mPCNL", and "miniaturization".

Results

A series of new progress has been made in many aspects of mini-PCNL, such as further reduction of tract size-needle perc and further improvement of robotic-assisted PCNL-artificial intelligence-powered robotic devices.

Conclusion

Many studies and trials have been conducted to reduce morbidity and increase the safety and effectiveness of mini-PCNL. It is crucial to realize that miniaturization of PCNL requires not only a smaller percutaneous tract size, but also an adjustment strategically in renal access, stone removal, lithotripsy, and surgical model in general. More large-scale prospective research needs to be carried out to further validate and optimize the safety and effectiveness of mini-PCNL.

Correlation analysis between renal anatomical factors and residual stones after an ultrasound-guided PCNL

Introduction

To predict the factors of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) by analyzing the characteristics of the renal anatomical structure in intravenous urography, so as to make a reasonable operation plan, reduce the risk of residual stones in PCNL, and improve the stone-free rate (SFR).

Methods

A retrospective study was performed between January 2019 and September 2020 for patients treated with PCNL. According to the results of a kidney ureter bladder review after PCNL, 245 patients were divided into a residual stone group (71 patients, stone size >4 mm) and a stone-free group (174 patients, stone size ≤4 mm). An independent sample t-test was used to analyze the age, the length and width of channel calices, the angle between the channel calices and the involved calices, and the length and width of the involved calices. The gender, the channel types, the number of channels, the degree of hydronephrosis, and the number of involved calices were analyzed by using the chi-square test. A score of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. At the same time, logistic regression analysis was carried out to explore the independent influencing factors of the SFR after PCNL.

Results

A total of 71 patients developed residual stones after surgery. The overall residual rate was 29.0%. The width of the channel calices (p = 0.003), the angle between the channel calices and the involved calices (p = 0.007), the width of the involved calices (p < 0.001), the channel types (p = 0.008), and the number of involved calices (p < 0.001) were all significantly correlated with residual stones after PCNL. Logistic regression analysis showed that the width of the channel calices (p = 0.003), the angle between the channel calices and the involved calices (p = 0.012), the width of the involved calices (p < 0.001), the channel types (p = 0.008), and the number of involved calyces (p < 0.001) were all independent influencing factors of the SFR after PCNL.

Conclusion

A larger caliceal neck width and angle can reduce the risk of residual stones. The more calyces that are involved, the higher the risk of residual stones. There was no difference between F16 and F18, but F16 had a higher SFR than F24.

Reasons and risk factors for delayed discharge after day-surgery percutaneous nephrolithotomy

BACKGROUND

Day-surgery percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is being developed quickly but some potential factors are affecting the recovery process. This study is aim to analyze the reasons and risk factors for delayed discharge after day-surgery PCNL.

METHODS

The data of 205 patients who accepted day-surgery PCNL in our institution between January 2018 and February 2020 were analyzed, retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the risk factors for delayed discharge. Besides, the nomogram prediction model was established by the multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The rate of delayed discharge was 14.6%. Independent risk factors for delayed discharge were larger stone burden (odds ratio [OR] = 3.814, P = 0.046), positive urine nitrite (OR = 1.001, P = 0.030), longer duration of surgery (OR = 1.020, P = 0.044), multiple nephrostomy tubes (OR = 4.282, P = 0.008). The five main reasons that caused delayed discharge included psychological reasons, pain, bleeding, urosepsis, and urine leakage.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified some independent risk factors for a hospital length of stay longer than 24 h. Patients with larger renal stones or positive urine nitrite may be at increased risk of delayed discharge after day-surgery PCNL. Reducing surgery time and nephrostomy tubes will help to facilitate recovery.

International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) Guideline on percutaneous nephrolithotomy

The International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) would like to release the latest guideline on percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and to provide a clinical framework for surgeons performing PCNLs. These recommendations were collected and appraised from a systematic review and assessment of the literature covering all aspects of PCNLs from the PubMed database between January 1, 1976, and July 31, 2021. Each generated recommendation was graded using a modified GRADE methodology. The quality of the evidence was graded using a classification system modified from the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Forty-seven recommendations were summarized and graded, which covered the following issues, indications and contraindications, stone complexity evaluation, preoperative imaging, antibiotic strategy, management of antithrombotic therapy, anesthesia, position, puncture, tracts, dilation, lithotripsy, intraoperative evaluation of residual stones, exit strategy, postoperative imaging and stone-free status evaluation, complications. The present guideline on PCNL was the first in the IAU series of urolithiasis management guidelines. The recommendations, tips and tricks across the PCNL procedures would provide adequate guidance for urologists performing PCNLs to ensure safety and efficiency in PCNLs.

Ultrasound-Guided Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Suction Sheath

The mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a mainstay in the treatment of kidney calculi, particularly in case of >2 cm kidney stones, large lower pole stones, large impacted proximal ureteral stones, and residual stones after failed extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or retrograde intrarenal surgery. An accurate renal access represents a fundamental part of the procedure, modalities to guide the percutaneous tract preparation include ultrasound, fluoroscopy, or their combination. Both ultrasound and fluoroscopy offer several advantages and some limitations. The combined utilization of ultrasound and fluoroscopy is less adopted nowadays; however, this strategy has its merits particularly in cases where the puncture can be problematic with one imaging modality alone. Ultrasound can easily identify the posterior renal calix and surrounding visceral structures, although some situations such as obese patients, undilated collecting system or complex stones may represent a challenge. Intracaliceal blood clots and air may reflect ultrasound, reducing significantly the image quality. Therefore, the assessment of the intrarenal anatomy, the stone identification, and the ability of guiding the needle during access may decrease significantly, particularly in cases with complex stones, when multiple tracts are required. In these cases, fluoroscopy could determine the relationship between the angle and depth of the puncture needle and the target calices by rotating the C-arm to help the needle puncture and tract dilation. Therefore, the benefits of dual guidance would be beneficial during PCNL. In addition to an improved accuracy of puncture and dilation, the combined approach improves the detection of residual stones, facilitating the achievement of a stone-free state. Herein we describe our experience with this technique, describing surgical steps and troubleshooting tips of mini-PCNL in the accompanying video. Further high-quality studies are needed to demonstrate the advantages of combined utilization of ultrasound and fluoroscopy during PCNL and its optimal indications.

Presence of a Novel Anatomical Structure May Cause Bleeding When Using the Calyx Access in Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Background

Fused renal pyramid (FRP) is a kidney anatomical structure which was first identified by us. The vascular anatomy of FRP exhibits different from that of the normal renal pyramid (NRP), manifested by the distribution of the ectopic interlobar arteries in FRP. In this study, we analyzed the effect of FRPs on bleeding when using calyx access in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Patients and Methods

Overall, 633 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided single-tract mini-PCNL were divided into two groups according to the puncture method used: in group A, puncture was performed through the axial direction of the renal calyx, the line from the apex of the fornix to the center of the neck plane under B-mode ultrasound guidance; and in group B, Doppler ultrasound-guided axillary puncture through calyces corresponding to NRPs when the plane of renal column blood vessels on both sides was selected or calyx puncture through the hypovascular area of the FRPs. Relevant demographic and clinical data were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

The two groups exhibited similar baseline characteristics. No significant differences were found in hemoglobin reduction, puncture site, tract size, postoperative creatinine level, or stone-free rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). Blood transfusion and embolization rates in group B were significantly lower than those in group A (P = 0.03 and 0.045, respectively). No differences were found between the two groups in terms of persistent pain, hydrothorax, fever, subcapsular hematoma, and urosepsis (P > 0.05). The overall complication rate was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.505).

Conclusions

FRP is a non-negligible anatomical structure that may cause hemorrhage when using calyx access. Doppler ultrasound can identify ectopic blood vessels in FRPs to reduce bleeding during calyx access in mini-PCNL procedures.

Feasibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and flank position during percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with no apparent hydronephrosis: a randomized controlled trial

Purpose

To investigate the puncture accuracy and feasibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in flank position for patients with no apparent hydronephrosis.

Methods

Between May 2018 and June 2020, 72 kidney stone patients with no or mild hydronephrosis were randomized into two groups: a CEUS-guided PCNL group and a conventional ultrasound (US)-guided group. Patients’ demographics and perioperative outcomes were compared, including the success rate of puncture via calyceal fornix, the success rate of a single-needle puncture, puncture time, operative time, postoperative hemoglobin loss, stone-free rate, incidence of complications and postoperative stay.

Results

The success rate of puncture via calyceal fornix for CEUS-guided group was significantly higher than that for conventional US-guided group (86.1 vs. 47.2%, p = 0.002). Patients performed with CEUS-guided PCNL required shorter renal puncture time than those guided with conventional US (36.5 s vs. 61.0 s, p < 0.001). The median postoperative hemoglobin loss in the CEUS-guided group was significantly lower than that in conventional US-guided group (2.5 vs. 14.5 g/L, p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the success rate of a single-needle puncture, operative time, stone-free rate, incidence of complications and postoperative stay between the two groups.

Conclusion

CEUS guidance facilitates identification of the renal calyx fornix, and benefits more precise renal puncture and less hemoglobin loss in PCNL. CEUS-guided PCNL in flank position is a feasible approach to the treatment of kidney stone patients with no apparent hydronephrosis.

Trial registration number: ChiCTR1800015417.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-022-03933-4.

Outcome of Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy (TPLU) for proximal ureteral stone > 15 mm: Our experience with 60 cases

PURPOSE

We aim to review our experience of transperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (TPLU) for proximal ureteric stone more than 15 mm.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between June 2017 to December 2020, sixty patients with a history of unsuccessful Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and/or failed ureteroscopy for impacted ureteral calculi more than 15 mm who accepted TPLU were enrolled in our study. The patients' demographic information and post-treatment results were gathered and analyzed, retrospectively.

RESULTS

The patients' mean age was 46.25 ± 12.56 years. The mean size of the stone was 20.11 ± 4.76 mm. 37 (61.7%) patients had severe hydronephrosis (HDN) and 46 (76.7%) stones were radio-opaque. Almost all of the patients underwent TPLU by a single urologist. The mean operation time was 72.86 ± 6.07 minutes without intraoperative complication (only 3 stones had upward migration to the pyelocaliceal system). The main operative blood loss was 88.86 ml. The average length of stay in the hospital was 45.8 ± 8.11 hours. The stone free rate (SFR) at discharge was 57 (95%). The overall complication rate was 27 (45%). Regarding early complications, fever was found in 8 (13.3%) patients, and 3 patients (5%) had paralytic ileus. The rate of urine leak was 8.3%, and 8 (13.3%) patients required blood transfusions. In multivariate analysis, the multiple stones, bigger stone in size, incomplete SFR, longer duration of hospital admission, and severe HDN were associated with a high early complication rate (p = 0.05, 0.04, < 001, 0.03, and 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

TPLU is a harmless option for managing proximal ureteric stone as a primary procedure or salvage procedure with good outcomes and acceptable complication rates.

Approach to nephrostomy tubes in the emergency department

BACKGROUND

Nephrostomy tubes are commonly placed for urinary obstruction, urinary diversion, or future endourologic procedures. While the technical success of nephrostomy tube placement is high, nephrostomy tube complications may occur.

OBJECTIVE OF REVIEW

Limited literature exists regarding the complication of nephrostomy tubes and their approach in the emergency department. This review summarizes the existing literature and provides a framework for emergency providers regarding the evaluation and management of nephrostomy tube complications.

DISCUSSION

Nephrostomy tube failure, caused by kinking, dislodgment, or migration can manifest with obstructive signs and symptoms. In well appearing patients, asymptomatic bacteriuria is common and should not be treated. However, in the presence of infectious symptoms, patients should be treated similarly to complicated cystitis or pyelonephritis. While gross hematuria is common following catheter placement, prolonged hematuria, or the return of hematuria after previous resolution should trigger investigation for hematoma formation or a delayed presentation of an intraoperative vascular injury. Finally, clinicians should obtain laboratory testing, advanced imaging, and specialty consultation if serious complications are suspected.

CONCLUSION

This narrative review highlights general nephrostomy tube care, minor complications, and troubleshooting in the emergency department. The majority of these minor complications can be managed at the bedside without specialty consultation. However, in patients with more serious complications including dislodgement, obstruction, infection, bleeding, and pleural injury, laboratory assessment and advanced imaging to include ultrasound and computed tomography with specialty consultation are essential in the patient's evaluation and management, particularly in cases of immune compromise and worsening renal function.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy - the puncture

OBJECTIVE

To determine what importance is given to the puncture and assistive technologies in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in the current urological literature.

METHODS

PubMed was searched for English publications and reviews for the keywords: 'percutaneous nephrolithotomy', 'percutaneous nephrostomy', 'puncture'. The search was limited to the last 5 years, January 2016 until February 2021. Based on 183 abstracts, 121 publications were selected, read, and reviewed. References, older or seminal papers were read and cited if they contributed to a better understanding. A total of 198 references form the basis of this narrative review.

RESULTS

The puncture is frequently referred to as the most crucial part of PNL. In contrast, the influence of the puncture on the failure rate of PNL and the specific puncture-related complications seems to be low in the single-digit percentage range. However, there are no universally accepted definitions and standards measuring the quality of puncture. Consequently, the impact of the puncture on general PNL complications, on stone scores predicting success rates and on learning curves evaluating surgeons' performance have not been systematically studied. Assistive technologies rely on fluoroscopy and ultrasonography, the latter of which is becoming the preferred imaging modality for monitoring the entire procedure. Needle bending, a problem relevant to all puncture techniques, is not addressed in the urological literature.

CONCLUSIONS

The importance attached to puncture in PNL in the current urological literature is subjectively high but objectively low. Some basics of puncture are not well understood in urology. Disciplines other than urology are more actively involved in the development of puncture techniques.

How does puncture modality affect the risk of intraoperative bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A prospective randomized trial

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the possible effects of two different renal puncture techniques (ultrasound-assisted [US-assisted], fluoroscopic-guided [FG]) on the intraoperative hemorrhage risk during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 130 patients with Guy stone scores of 1-2 were prospectively allocated to US-assisted and FG puncture groups by simple randomization. Patients with intraoperative pelvicalyceal rupture and the ones requiring multiple accesses were excluded from the study. Apart from the puncture steps, all other steps of the PCNL procedure were performed with similar techniques by a single surgeon. Patient characteristics, operative data, and postoperative outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 10 patients were excluded from the study due to intraoperative complications after puncture. Patient demographics and stone characteristics were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). Mean hemoglobin drop was meaningfully greater in the FG group (1.7 g/dL) when compared with US-assisted group (1.3 g/dL) (p < 0.01). The mean duration of radiation exposure was significantly higher for the FG (p < 0.001). Total operative time, number of attempts for a successful puncture, length of hospital stay, and stone free rates were similar between the groups (p > 0.05). In addition, the remaining complications classified according to the modified Clavien-Dindo grading system were similar between groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

US-assisted puncture provides significantly decreased level of hemoglobin drop and radiation exposure time when compared with FG.

Minimal invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini-PCNL) in children: Ultrasound versus fluoroscopic guidance

BACKGROUND

Miniaturization of endoscopic instruments in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) allowed less invasive procedures with low complication rates, especially in children. This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultrasonography-guided (USG) versus fluoroscopy-guided (FG) mini-PCNL in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective comparative study conducted from June 2015 to June 2020. The sample included 70 children (35 pateints underwent USG mini-PCNL and 35 pateints underwent FG mini-PCNL). They were compared mainly by the patients' demographic characteristics, procedural information, and post-treatment outcomes. In the USG mini-PCNL group, puncturing was performed using a 3.5 MHz US probe, whereas fluoroscopy was utilized in the FG mini- PCNL group.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable in terms of gender, previous history of failed ESWL, and hydronephrosis grade. The mean stone burden was 15.94 ± 3.69 mm and 19.20 ± 7.41 mm in USG and FG groups, respectively (p = 0.024). The stonefree rate (SFR) was 97.1% in the USG group and 94.3% in the FG group, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.16). Mean operative time in the USG group and FG group was 69.00 ± 13.33 minutes and 63.48 ± 16.90 minutes, respectively. Four (11.4%) patients in the FG group required blood transfusions to restore the hemodynamic state (p = 0.039). Fever was detected in 4 (11.4%) patients in the USG group and 15 (31.4%) patients in the FG group (p = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

In children, mini PCNL under USG is safe and as effective as fluoroscopy.

Comparison of the Prone Split-Leg Position with the Traditional Prone Position in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Propensity Score-Matching Study

Background and Objective: Several positions have been described for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of the traditional prone position PCNL (TP-PCNL) and the prone split-leg position PCNL (PSL-PCNL). Patients and Methods: A retrospective review was made of the data of 212 patients who underwent prone PCNL in PSL or TP between January 2017 and November 2019. The demographic and preoperative clinical data were used for propensity score-matching (PSM). Following the PSM based on a multivariable logistic regression model, the PSL-PCNL and TP-PCNL groups were compared in preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative parameters. All surgical procedures were performed by an experienced endourologist. Results: After PSM, 51 patients from the PSL-PCNL group were matched to 51 TP-PCNL patients. The stone burden was not statistically significant between the two groups (p = 0.388). The mean operation time of the two groups was significantly different (81.5 ± 32.4 minutes vs 93.1 ± 25.9 minutes, respectively, p = 0.026). The hemoglobin decrease in the PSL-PCNL group was greater than that in the TP-PCNL group (-17.7 ± 16.9 g/L vs 13.1 ± 10.9 g/L, p < 0.001). Both groups had similar stone-free rates after 2 weeks (p = 0.49). No significant difference was observed between the groups in the total complication rate (p = 1). Conclusions: The application of PSL in PCNL simplifies the surgical procedure and shortens the operating time. Another important advantage is that it allows retrograde intrarenal surgery and ureteroscopy to be performed simultaneously. We recommend the PSL to be applied in PCNL for renal stone patients.

How does puncture modality affect the risk of intraoperative bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A prospective randomized trial

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the possible effects of two different renal puncture techniques (ultrasound-assisted [US-assisted], fluoroscopic-guided [FG]) on the intraoperative hemorrhage risk during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 130 patients with Guy stone scores of 1-2 were prospectively allocated to US-assisted and FG puncture groups by simple randomization. Patients with intraoperative pelvicalyceal rupture and the ones requiring multiple accesses were excluded from the study. Apart from the puncture steps, all other steps of the PCNL procedure were performed with similar techniques by a single surgeon. Patient characteristics, operative data, and postoperative outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 10 patients were excluded from the study due to intraoperative complications after puncture. Patient demographics and stone characteristics were similar between the two groups (P>.05). Mean hemoglobin drop was meaningfully greater in the FG group (1.7g/dL) when compared with US-assisted group (1.3g/dL) (P<.01). The mean duration of radiation exposure was significantly higher for the FG (P<.001). Total operative time, number of attempts for a successful puncture, length of hospital stay, and stone free rates were similar between the groups (P>.05). In addition, the remaining complications classified according to the modified Clavien-Dindo grading system were similar between groups (P>.05).

CONCLUSION

US-assisted puncture provides significantly decreased level of hemoglobin drop and radiation exposure time when compared with FG.

European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis and International Alliance of Urolithiasis Joint Consensus on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

CONTEXT

Although percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been performed for decades and has gone through many refinements, there are still concerns regarding its more widespread utilization because of the long learning curve and the potential risk of severe complications. Many technical details are not included in the guidelines because of their nature and research protocol.

OBJECTIVE

To achieve an expert consensus viewpoint on PCNL indications, preoperative patient preparation, surgical strategy, management and prevention of severe complications, postoperative management, and follow-up.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

An international panel of experts from the Urolithiasis Section of the European Association of Urology, International Alliance of Urolithiasis, and other urology associations was enrolled, and a prospectively conducted study, incorporating literature review, discussion on research gaps (RGs), and questionnaires and following data analysis, was performed to reach a consensus on PCNL.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The expert panel consisted of 36 specialists in PCNL from 20 countries all around the world. A consensus on PCNL was developed. The expert panel was not as large as expected, and the discussion on RGs did not bring in more supportive evidence in the present consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate preoperative preparation, especially elimination of urinary tract infection prior to PCNL, accurate puncture with guidance of fluoroscopy and/or ultrasonography or a combination, keeping a low intrarenal pressure, and shortening of operation time during PCNL are important technical requirements to ensure safety and efficiency in PCNL.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been a well-established procedure for the management of upper urinary tract stones. However, according to an expert panel consensus, core technical aspects, as well as the urologist's experience, are critical to the safety and effectiveness of PCNL.

Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus conventional ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with nondilated collecting system: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety, effectiveness, and feasibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) versus conventional ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with nondilated collecting system.

METHODS

Between July 2018 and July 2020, 160 kidney stone patients with nondilated collecting system planned for PCNL were randomly assigned into two groups, CEUS with retrograde ureteral contrast injection and conventional ultrasound with retrograde ureteral normal saline injection. Patient's demographics, the success rate of puncture, success rate of a single-needle puncture, number of punctures, puncture time, perioperative outcomes, stone-free rate, and incidence of complications were compared.

RESULTS

The success rate of a single-needle puncture for CEUS-guided PCNL was higher than that in the conventional ultrasound group (88.5% vs. 73.7%, p = 0.02). Patients performed with CEUS-guided PCNL required less needle passes (p = 0.02), shorter needle puncture time (p = 0.031), and shorter channel establishment time (p = 0.04) than those guided with conventional ultrasound. The postoperative hemoglobin decrease in the CEUS-guided PCNL group was less than that of the control group (p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in operating time, length of hospital stays, kidney function change, and complications between the two groups (p > 0.05). The 1-month stone-free rate was 94.9% in the CEUS group and 90.8% in the control group (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with conventional ultrasound, CEUS-guided PCNL may facilitate ultrasound-guided PCNL for patients without hydronephrosis, and benefited with a higher success rate of a single-needle puncture, less needle passes, shorter puncture time, and lower postoperative Hb drop.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1800016981 KEY POINTS: • Compared with conventional ultrasound, CEUS-guided PCNL is a safe and efficacious procedure for kidney stone patients with nondilated collecting system. • Compared with conventional ultrasound, CEUS-guided PCNL benefited with a higher success rate of a single-needle puncture, less needle passes, shorter puncture time, and lower postoperative Hb drop. • CEUS-guided PCNL associated with the more accurate needle puncture and acceptable complications.

Ultrasound or Fluoroscopy for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Access, Is There Really a Difference? A Review of Literature

Objective: To compare whether the outcomes of ultrasound-guided access percutaneous nephrolithotomy (USGA-PCNL) are similar to standard fluoroscopy-guided access percutaneous nephrolithotomy (FGA-PCNL). Methods: A review was developed by using the MEDLINE and Scopus databases and following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol. Studies comparing the USGA-PCNL and the FGA-PCNL were included. Case reports, editorials and letters, unpublished studies, posters, and comments abstracts were excluded. Results: We found 12 published articles that compared USGA-PCNL and FGA-PCNL. These included six randomized controlled trials, three case-control trials, and three meta-analyses. The overall results showed no difference in the success of percutaneous access, bleeding, blood transfusion, operative time, postoperative complications, or hospital stay. Conclusion: The reported data demonstrate that there are no significant differences between the fluoroscopic-guided access PCNL and the ultrasonographic access PCNL. The choice of puncture depends on the surgeon's expertise in a particular technique and the patient and stone characteristics. Both approaches are equally safe and effective in experienced hands. It is important to recall that the use of one technique does not exclude the use of the other, and they can sometimes be complementary to each other.

Is multiple tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy a safe approach for staghorn calculi?

PURPOSE

To explore the safety of multiple tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in terms of complication and draw a nomogram to predict the possibility of significant renal function decline (SRFD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with complex renal calculi appropriate for PNL at our institution between August 2016 and February 2018 were included in the study. The outcome of single and multiple tract PNL was analyzed retrospectively. A nomogram was created to predict the probability of SRFD.

RESULTS

793 (88.4%) patients were treated with single tract PNL (Group 1) and 104 patients (11.6%) treated with multiple tract PNL (Group 2). Group 2 had a significantly greater hemoglobin reduction (16.0 ± 12.5 vs. 11.4 ± 11.8 g/L, p < 0.001), higher rate of postoperative fever (19.2% vs. 11.9%, p = 0.034) and longer duration of the operation (110.6 ± 39.6 vs. 97.8 ± 34.5 min, p < 0.001). A nomogram for predicting the probability of SRFD was constructed based on identified risk factors: patients' age, positive urine culture (UC +), hemoglobin reduction and embolization. The area of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 70%. Bootstrapping technique utilized to make the calibration plot showed a high reliability of the nomogram.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple tract PNL had a higher risk of hemoglobin reduction and postoperative fever than single tract PNL. Multiple tracts had no effect on SRFD, but old age, UC + , hemoglobin reduction and embolization were risk factors for SRFD. A nomogram with the aim of predicting the probability of SRFD based on these parameters demonstrated good uniformity in internal validation.

Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): Techniques and outcomes

Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was introduced to decrease the morbidity of the standard PCNL (sPCNL). Thereafter, many modifications and techniques have been presented with the introduction of different miniaturized PCNL (mPCNL) techniques, such as micro-PCNL and ultra-mini-PCNL (UMP). As of present, none of the techniques has displaced the sPCNL. Nonetheless, mini-PCNL has continuously widening indications and has been proposed to have significant advantages over sPCNL. In the current review, each technique is presented while discussing the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. A comprehensive review of the current literature has been performed. Articles related to the topic were retrieved and critically analyzed. Less peri-operative bleeding and shorter hospital stay were the most important advantages advocated for mini-PCNL. Although the performance of mini-PCNL is safe, the utilization of micro-PCNL and UMP should be done with caution.

Multiple-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy as a day surgery for the treatment of complex renal stones: an initial experience

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of multiple-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) as a day surgery for the treatment of complex renal stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A mature protocol for day surgery was implemented. Forty-six patients who underwent planned day-surgery PCNL via multiple tracts for the treatment of complex renal stones were retrospectively reviewed. All procedures were performed by an experienced surgeon. The outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean stone size and burden were 4.8 cm and 990.2 mm², respectively. There were 26 (56.5%) and 20 (43.5%) patients with staghorn stones and multiple stones, respectively. Totals of two, three, and more than three tracts (with up to 7 tracts) were established in 22, 11, and 13 patients, respectively. The tract sizes ranged from 14 to 24 Fr. One to four nephrostomy tubes were placed in most patients, and a tubeless process was accomplished in only 3 (6.5%) patients. The mean surgery time was 116 min with a hemoglobin drop of 22.1 ± 16.8 g/L. Eight (17.4%) patients developed postoperative complications, with severe complications (Clavien grades III-IV) in two cases (4.4%). 39 (84.8%) patients were discharged within 24 h after surgery, and 7 (15.2%) patients were fully admitted. Only 1 (2.2%) patient required readmission. The stone clearance rate was 84.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Day-surgery PCNL can be safely performed via multiple percutaneous tracts by experienced surgeons and is an efficient strategy for the treatment of complex renal stones.

Techniques - Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: How we do it

Ultrasonography has emerged as an alternative to fluoroscopy for image-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in many countries. Compared to fluoroscopy-guided PCNL (F-PCNL), ultrasound-guided PCNL (US-PCNL) is easier to learn and reduces radiation exposure to patients and providers. Despite these advantages, uptake of ultrasound-guided PCNL (US-PCNL) in Canada has been almost nonexistent, largely because it is not incorporated into urologists' training. In this article, we seek to familiarize Canadian urologists with this approach by describing our step-by-step technique for US-PCNL. Additionally, we provide keys to successful implementation of this technique.

Mini PCNL Over Standard PCNL: What Makes it Better?

The incidence of small- and medium-size renal stones is rising. Stone clearance, bleeding, urine leak, and infectious complications are major concerns for urologists. They can choose the best technique from a list of armamentarium available. Minimally invasive approach like percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has significantly influenced renal stone management since 1976. Miniaturization of the instruments innovate more effective and safer alternatives for urolithasis management. The outcome of mini-PCNL is explored and compared with standard PCNL in this review. Original research articles were reviewed using a systematic approach (keyword electronic database search). Duplicates were excluded in each step and 19 original articles out of 156 hits were analyzed. Mini-PCNL has significantly less bleeding complications and hospital stay. There were no significant difference in stone free rate between mini-PCNL and standard PCNL. The stone-free rate and complications rates were less dependent on the technique of puncture, tract dilatation, and energy used to fragment stones. The total operative time became slightly longer in mini-PCNL attributed to the sheath size and stone fragments retrieval. We found that mini-PCNL is as effective as standard PCNL with fewer complications. Stone burden is the key factor responsible for overall stone-free rate. However, the recommendation is limited by quality of study and the sample sizes.

Evaluation of day-care versus inpatient mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a propensity score-matching study

Day-care percutaneous nephrolithotomy (day-PCNL) is being performed more routinely, however, safety remains a concern. The purpose of this study was to compare the complication rate, readmission rate and medical cost saving between day-PCNL and inpatient-PCNL. A protocol for day-PCNL was applied. A retrospective review of 86 patients planned day-PCNL by one surgeon were conducted. Using propensity matching, 86 inpatients (minimum 2-day post-operative stay) treated with the same procedure were matched. For each cohort, 14-day occurrence of complications and unplanned readmissions were recorded and compared. More than 80% of patients had multiple or staghorn stones in both groups. There were no significant differences between stone-free rate, operative time, multiple-tracts use, hemoglobin drop (each p > 0.05). Day- PCNL has a higher tubeless rate (60.8% vs. 24.4%, p < 0.001) and were less costly (mean 2732 vs. 3828 dollars) compared with inpatient PCNL. Within 14 days post-operatively, 10 day-care patients (11.6%) and 13 inpatients (15.1%) experienced complications, with no difference in rate or severity. Four patients (4.6%) required full admission (longer than 24 h) and two patents needed readmission in day-PCNL group. Day-care PCNL was more cost-effective than in-patients PCNL, with no significant difference in complications along with very low unplanned readmission during the postoperative period of 14 days. Therefore, day-care PCNL is a cost-effective choice in selected patients.

Day-surgery percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a high-volume center retrospective experience

PURPOSE

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is traditionally performed on an inpatient basis. We determine the safety and outcome of day-surgery PCNL by experienced surgeon hands.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A protocol for day-surgery PCNL was undertaken. A retrospective analysis of all 86 cases of planned day-surgery PCNL accomplished by an experienced surgeon who followed this protocol between May 2017 and March 2019 was performed. Patient demographics, operative data, complications, and readmission rates were recorded. Day-surgery PCNL was defined as discharge of patients either the same day or within 24 h after surgery.

RESULTS

The average stone burden was 361.1 mm² and 70 (81.4%) of patients had multiple stones or staghorn stones. 82 (95.4%) patients achieved same-day discharge or received overnight observation prior to discharge, and 4 patients (4.6%) required full admission (longer than 24 h). The readmission rate was 2.3% (2 patients). The postoperative complications occurred in 10 (11.6%) patients, including 7, 2, 2 of grade I, II, III complications. The average operation time was 64 min and the hemoglobin drop was 15.7 ± 16.9 g/L. The established tracts size ranged from 16 to 22Fr. The stone clearance rate was 90.7%. The tubeless without nephrostomy tube was performed in 60.5%. Eight cases were performed by multiple-tracts PCNL with 2-4 tracts, with only two case required full admission.

CONCLUSION

Experienced surgeons who performed day-surgery PCNL experience excellent patient outcomes in appropriately selected patients. Most complications can be treated conservatively and only a few required intervention or readmission.

Recommended antibiotic prophylaxis regimen in retrograde intrarenal surgery: evidence from a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To study the incidence of postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) following different antibiotic prophylaxis (ABP) regimens in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Single-centre, randomised, controlled trial (August 2014-September 2017) including 426 patients with renal stones with preoperative sterile urine managed by RIRS (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02304822). Different ciprofloxacin-based ABP regimens were used and included a zero dose, single dose (30 min before surgery) or two doses (first dose at 30 min before RIRS and additional dose within 6 h after RIRS). The incidence of SIRS was compared using intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses.

RESULTS

Each group enrolled 142 patients. In the ITT analysis, a zero dose of ABP was statistically similar to the two ABP regimes for the incidence of SIRS (9.9% vs single dose 4.9%, P = 0.112; vs two doses 4.2%, P = 0.062). There were also no relevant differences across groups in the PP analysis; no urosepsis was recorded. In subgroup analysis with stratification by stone area, the three regimens all had a low and similar incidence of SIRS for stones of ≤200 mm² in the ITT analysis with a sufficient power value (5.4% vs 6.2% vs 3.6%, P = 0.945 vs single dose and P = 0.553 vs two doses). However, there was a greater chance of SIRS in patients who received no ABP with stones of >200 mm² (18% vs single dose 4.3%, P = 0.036; vs two doses 5.5%, P = 0.044). Similar trends were seen in the PP analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with preoperative sterile urine, ABP is not strongly recommended in patients with stones of ≤200 mm² , but for stones >200 mm² single-dose ABP is still required.

Complete Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Prone and Supine Positions: A Randomized Controlled Study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, adverse events, and feasibility of ultrasound guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (US-PCNL) in the management of large renal stones in supine and prone positions and to point out the practical considerations related to these techniques in comparison with standard PCNL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was conducted between August 2013 to September 2018 as a prospective randomized and controlled study. A total of 392 consecutive patients with nephrolithiasis >2 cm were randomly assigned to undergo ultrasound PCNL in prone (P-US-PCNL) (132 patients); supine position (S-US-PCNL) (129 patients) or conventional PCNL (C-PCNL) (131 patients). The preoperative parameters, the intraoperative findings, operative time, hospital stay, perioperative morbidities, stone free rate, and related data were recorded.

RESULTS

The demographic and the baseline characteristics were comparable in all study groups. The mean number of trails and time for successful puncture in P-US-PCNL, S-US-PCNL, and C-PCNL were 1.9 ± 1, 2.3 ± 1.2, and 1.7±1, respectively (P < .001), and 15.8 ± 5.8, 19.3 ± 9.4, and 16.5 ± 8.1 seconds, respectively (P < .001). The operation time was 69 ± 22, 75 ± 23, and 72 ± 27 minutes, respectively, (P > .05). The mean nephrostomy time and length of hospital stay were 3 ± 1.3, 3.4 ± 1.5, 3.2 ± 1.2 hours, respectively, and 3.8 ± 1.5, 4.1 ± 1.5, 3.9 ± 1.3 days, respectively (P > .05). The mean percentage decrease in hemoglobin concentration was 1.65 ± 0.66, 1.77 ± 0.78, and 2.1 ± 0.9, respectively (P < .001), overall stone clearance was 88%, 79%, and 85%, respectively (P > .05). Complications were acceptable and similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

US-PCNL either in prone or supine position is as effective, feasible, and safe as C-PCNL with zero radiation exposure.

Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided (UG) versus fluoroscopy-guided (FG) percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials that compared UG-PCNL with FG-PCNL, and a meta-analysis of those studies was completed. The primary outcomes assessed were stone-free rate (SFR) and complication rate. Secondary outcomes assessed were the successful access-creation rate, time necessary for entrance into the target calyx, auxiliary procedure rate, transfusion rate, hemoglobin decrease after surgery, surgery duration, and hospital stay.

RESULTS

Eight studies comprising 966 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with FG-PCNL, UG-PCNL had comparable stone-free rates [odds ratio (OR) 0.95; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-1.35; p = 0.79] irrespective of the patient's position, and a favorable safety profile resulting in a lower complication rate (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.36-0.86; p = 0.009). No statistical difference was found between UG and FG groups in secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

UG-PCNL is as effective as FG-PCNL and has the advantage of lower complication rates. In addition, UG-PCNL could be performed with patients in the supine position without compromising its efficacy.

Early and rapid prediction of postoperative infections following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with complex kidney stones

OBJECTIVES

To obtain more accurate and rapid predictors of postoperative infections following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with complex kidney stones, and provide evidence for early prevention and treatment of postoperative infections.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 802 patients with complex kidney stones who underwent PCNL, from September 2016 to September 2017, were recruited. Urine tests, urine cultures (UCs) and stone cultures (SCs) were performed, and the perioperative data were prospectively recorded.

RESULTS

In all, 19 (2.4%) patients developed postoperative urosepsis. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that an operating time of ≥100 min, urine test results with both positive urine white blood cells (WBC+) and positive urine nitrite (WBC+NIT+), positive UCs (UC+), and positive SCs (SC+) were independent risk factors of urosepsis. The incidence of postoperative urosepsis was higher in patients with WBC+NIT+ (10%) or patients with both UC+ and SC+ (UC+SC+; 8.3%) than in patients with negative urine test results or negative cultures (P < 0.01). Preoperative WBC+NIT+ was predictive of UC+SC+, with an accuracy of >90%. The main pathogens found in kidney stones were Escherichia coli (44%), Proteus mirabilis (14%) and Staphylococcus (7.4%); whilst the main pathogens found in urine were E. coli (54%), Enterococcus (9.4%) and P. mirabilis (7.6%). The incidence of E. coli was more frequent in the group with urosepsis than in the group without urosepsis (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

WBC+NIT+ in preoperative urine tests could be considered as an early and rapid predictor of UC+SC+ and postoperative urosepsis. Urosepsis following PCNL was strongly associated with E. coli infections in patients with complex kidney stones.

Biplanar oblique access technique: A new approach to improve the success rate of percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Introduction:

Achieving suitable percutaneous access to the kidney is the most important step in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The triangulation biplanar access technique under fluoroscopy is the standard method to achieve percutaneous renal access, but it is not successful in all cases. We used the new biplanar oblique access technique as a rescue method for the failed standard biplanar technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of this oblique access technique on access outcome.

Methods:

In total, 782 percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures were performed under the standard triangulation biplanar technique. The biplanar access failed in 35 cases. Access failure was defined as no urine dropping from the needle or inability to insert the guide wire into the renal pelvis or selected calyx. In 28 failed access cases, the lower calyx was the targeted calyx. We used the oblique access technique for these cases. Initially, the arm of fluoroscopy was in the vertical position. Then the fluoroscopy device was rotated to 30° near the surgeon and 30° caudal to the patient and the needle was inserted into the appropriate calyx.

Results:

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures were performed by the oblique access technique in 28 patients. Successful access was achieved in eight patients by the oblique technique (success access rate = 28.6%). No major or minor complication occurred in these patients.

Conclusion:

The oblique technique is an auxiliary method for accessing the lower calyx in cases which the standard triangular biplanar method has failed. As the failure rate of the biplanar technique is low, the oblique technique can be considered as a useful method for percutaneous access.