Managing penetrating renal trauma: experience from two major trauma centres in the UK

Conservative management in high-grade renal trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically investigate and analyse the aggregated data from recent studies to provide a quantitative synthesis for a conservative approach to the management of high-grade kidney trauma, as accumulating evidence supports the favourable outcomes of a conservative approach.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed using databases, including PubMed, EBSCO, ProQuest, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library, to identify studies relevant to high-grade renal trauma in both adult and paediatric populations. The compare review focused on comparing conservative management interventions, such as observation, rest, resuscitation, transfusion, symptomatic management, and angioembolisation, with operative management interventions. Search strategies incorporated specific medical subject headings and keywords related to conservative management, kidney trauma, mortality, and renal preservation. Random and fixed-effect meta-analyses were conducted to estimate the rates of nephrectomy and mortality, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 36 and 29 studies were included for qualitative and quantitative synthesis, respectively. The aggregated data showed a cumulative risk difference of 0.52 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-0.66, P < 0.001), indicating a higher likelihood of nephrectomy in cases where operative management was used instead of conservative management. In terms of mortality, conservative management demonstrated a lower risk difference of 0.09 (95% CI 0.05-0.13, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that opting for conservative management in cases of high-grade renal trauma, particularly for haemodynamically stable patients, presents a lower risk of mortality and reduced probability of requiring nephrectomy when compared to operative management. These findings provide strong evidence in favour of considering conservative management as a viable and effective treatment option for high-grade renal trauma.

Crossbow Injuries: Predictors of Mortality

INTRODUCTION

Crossbow injuries are rare but carry significant morbidity and mortality, and there is limited evidence in the medical literature to guide care. This paper reviews the case reports and case series of crossbow injuries and looks for trends regarding morbidity and mortality based on the type of arrow, anatomic location of injury, and intent of injury.

METHODS

Multiple databases were searched for cases of crossbow injuries and data were abstracted into a spreadsheet. Statistics were done in SPSS.

RESULTS

358 manuscripts were returned in the search. After deduplication and removal of nonclinical articles, 101 manuscripts remained. Seventy-one articles describing 90 incidents met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 36.5 years. There were 10 female and 79 male victims. Fatality was 36% for injuries by field tip arrows and 71% for broadhead arrows, p  =  .024. Assaults were fatal in 84% of cases, suicides in 29%, and accidental injuries in 17%, p < .001. Mortality was similar for wounds to the head and neck (41%), chest (42%), abdomen (33%), extremities (50%), and multiple regions, p  =  .618.

CONCLUSIONS

Crossbows are potentially lethal weapons sold with fewer restrictions than firearms. Injuries caused by broadhead arrows are more likely to be fatal than injuries from field tip arrows. The anatomic location of injury does not correlate with fatality. More than half of crossbow injuries are due to attempted suicide, with a high case-fatality rate.

Renal injuries in conflict zones: a 6-year study of traumatic cases in Afghanistan

PURPOSE

During hostilities, gunshot wounds are the most common cause of penetrating injuries. In 8-10% of abdominal injuries kidneys are involved. The treatment method include surgical or conservative treatment (fluids + blood components).

METHODS

Of 1266 combat trauma cases treated during 6 to 14 rotation of the Polish Military Contingent in Afghanistan, we extracted a subgroup of 44 kidney injuries. Corelation of trauma mechanism, PATI score, treatment methods, and outcomes was evaluated.

RESULTS

Out of the 41 renal injuries, 20 considered left, 18 right, and 3 both kidneys. There were no statistical significancy in injury lateralization (p = 0.669), and no differences regarding side of a trauma and quantity of blood component used for the treatment (p = 0.246). Nephrectomy was performed on 17 patients (13 left vs. 4 right). A significant correlation between PATI score and the need for a nephrectomy (p = 0.027) was confirmed. Penetrating trauma recquired higher number of blood components comparing to blunt trauma (p < 0.001). The renal salvage rate was in study group was 61.36%. The overall survival (OS) rate was 90.25% - 4 patients died due to trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

The damage side does not result in a statistically significant increase in the need for blood transfusions or differences in the PATI score. The mechanism of trauma does, however, affect the number of blood components required for treatment, particularly in cases of penetrating trauma. With the introduction of proper treatment, the overall survival rate exceeds 90%, even when opting for conservative treatment.

Influencing Factors of Massive Hemorrhage and High-Grade Renal Vascular Injury after PCNL: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Purpose

Severe hemorrhage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a rare but alerting event. In this study, we report the factors affecting massive hemorrhage after PCNL, various levels of vascular damage during renal angiography, and the therapeutic effect of superselective renal artery embolization (SRAE). Patients and Methods. A retrospective analysis was performed on the data of 69 patients with postoperative PCNL hemorrhage who underwent SRAE from January 2010 to March 2021. Inclusion criteria for all cases were failure of conservative treatment for severe renal hemorrhage after surgery and then treatment with SRAE. In addition, 98 patients without significant hemorrhage after PCNL were randomly selected as the control group. All clinical data are confirmed by imaging and laboratory examinations. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to find risk factors of massive hemorrhage and high-grade renal vascular injury after PCNL.

Results

A total of 69 patients underwent angiography, 64 of which received SRAE due to positive hemorrhages detected by angiography. Urinary tract infection (OR (95% CI) = 11.214 (2.804∼44.842)), high blood pressure (OR (95% CI) = 5.686 (1.401∼23.083)), and no hydronephrosis (OR (95% CI) = 0.189 (0.049∼0.724)) are the most important factors leading to massive hemorrhage after PCNL. In patients who need SRAE after hemorrhage, high-grade vascular injury (grade III) is related to advanced age and decreased hemoglobin.

Conclusion

During the perioperative period of PCNL, patients with a risk of hypertension, urinary tract infection, and no hydronephrosis should be strengthened to monitor their high risk of postoperative hemorrhage. For patients with postoperative hemorrhage, we can use the patient's age and decreased hemoglobin before and after operation for analysis. In this way, individualized assessment can greatly improve the efficiency of SRAE treatment.

Predictive factors for nephrectomy in renal trauma; assessment of a 6-point score

PURPOSE

To evaluate predictive and associated risk factors for nephrectomy in renal trauma and assess a 6-point score for surgical decision-making.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective, and observational study assessed 247 subjects with blunt or penetrating kidney trauma. Kidney injuries were classified according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Injury Scoring Scale. Renal trauma was classified as "low-grade" (Grades I-III), Grade IV, and Grade V. Subjects were compared according to conservative treatment (CTrt.) or nephrectomy. Predictive factors were evaluated with a multiple regression model. A 6-point score was evaluated with a ROC analysis.

RESULTS

Patients requiring nephrectomy had a lower mean arterial pressure MAP compared to CTrt, 64.71 mmHg (SD ± 10.26) and 73.86 (SD ± 12.42), respectively (p =  < 0.001). A response to IV solutions was observed in 90.2% of patients undergoing CTrt. (p =  < 0.001, OR = 0.211, 95%CI = 0.101-0.442). Blood lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L was associated with nephrectomy (p =  < 0.001). A hematoma ≥ 25 mm was observed in 41.5% of patients undergoing nephrectomy compared to 20.1% of CTrt. (p = 0.004, OR = 9.29, 95% CI = 1.37-5.58). A logistic regression analysis (p =  < 0.001) showed that blood lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L (p = 0.043), an inadequate response to IV solutions (p = 0.041) and renal trauma grade IV-V (p =  < 0.001), predicted nephrectomy. A 6-point score with a cut-off value ≥ 3 points showed 83% sensitivity and 87% specificity for nephrectomy with an AUC of 89.9% (p =  < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

An inadequate response to IV solutions, a lactate level ≥ 4 mmol/L, and grade IV-V renal trauma predict nephrectomy. A score ≥ 3 points showed a good performance in this population.

Safety and efficacy of Endovascular Management of high-grade blunt renal injury

Objectives

To provide data on the safety and efficacy of renal arterial embolization (RAE) in patients with high-grade blunt renal injury.

Materials and methods

Fifteen patients with high-grade blunt renal injury (AAST grades IV-V) admitted to our hospital from July 2014 to December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed in this study. Their clinical success rate and complications were investigated accordingly.

Results

Fifteen patients with high-grade blunt renal injury, 13 men and 2 women with an average age of 41.6 years, including 11 hemodynamically unstable patients and 4 stable patients, were treated with RAE. Among these patients, 73.3% (11 of 15) had grade IV, and 26.7% (4 of 15) had grade V injuries, while 53.3% (8 of 15) patients had concomitant injuries. One patient received main RAE and 14 patients received selective RAE. The clinical success rate after the first embolization was 93.3% (14 of 15). RAE was repeated and was successfully performed in one patient with sustained hematuria. No significant difference in creatinine levels was found before and after embolization. During the follow-up period of 2–82 months, two patients required tube drainage due to urine leaks, one patient developed renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy, and one patient developed secondary hypertension.

Conclusions

RAE can provide a high success rate of hemostasis for both hemodynamically stable and unstable patients with high-grade blunt renal injury, and only minor complications are observed with this procedure.

Renal puncture access using a blunt needle: proposal of the blunt puncture concept

Purpose

Severe haemorrhage in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is an alarming event, and preventing injury to renal major vessels is a challenge. We evaluated the efficiency of a blunt needle in renal puncture procedures.

Methods

We first retrospectively reviewed the embolization images of post-PCNL patients to analyse the types of arteries injured, which were considered target arteries. Then, either a blunt needle or a conventional needle was used to directly puncture target arteries in ex vivo porcine kidneys and to establish renal access ex vivo and in vivo. The primary outcome was the incidence of target artery injuries, which were observed by digital subtraction angiography, nephroscopy and 3-dimensional endocasts. The secondary outcome was the rate of excreted fluid per access.

Results

The segmental and interlobar arteries were the most common types of injured arteries that needed to be embolized after PCNL. When these arteries were punctured directly, blunt needles reduced injury (1/20 vs. 16/20; OR 4.750; 95% CI 1.966–11.478; P < .001) by 76% compared to injuries induced by conventional needles. Moreover, the blunt needle group also had a significantly lower incidence of these arteries’ injuries ex vivo due to renal puncture and yielded a lower rate of excreted fluid in ex vivo and in vivo renal puncture procedures.

Conclusion

A blunt needle for renal puncture can be effective in reducing injury to renal major arteries and the accompanying haemorrhage. We propose the concept of blunt puncture, which may be a promising method for achieving safe renal access in PCNL.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-021-03927-8.

Endovascular Interventional Radiology of the Urogenital Tract

Interventional radiology of the male urogenital system includes percutaneous and endovascular procedures, and these last consist mostly of transcatheter arterial embolizations. At the kidney level, arterial embolizations are performed mainly for palliative treatment of parenchymal tumors, for renal traumas and, less frequently, for arteriovenous fistulas and renal aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms. These latter may often require emergency intervention as they can cause renal or peri-renal hematomas or significant hematuria. Transcatheter arterial embolization is also an effective therapy for intractable severe bladder hematuria secondary to a number of neoplastic and inflammatory conditions in the pelvis, including unresectable bladder cancer and radiation-induced or cyclophosphamide-induced hemorrhagic cystitis. Endovascular interventional procedures for the penis are indicated for the treatment of post-traumatic priapism. In this article, we review the main endovascular radiological interventions of the male urogenital system, describing the technical aspects, results, and complications of each procedure at the various anatomical districts.

[Penetrating abdominal trauma]

The management of patients with penetrating abdominal trauma has significantly changed in recent years. While exploratory laparotomy was the gold standard in Germany in all patients up to the 1970s, selective nonoperative management (SNOM) is increasingly being discussed in hemodynamically stable patients without pathological findings in computed tomography (CT) scan or extended focussed assessment with sonography for trauma (eFAST). A standard algorithm taking a balance between invasiveness, patient safety and the use of resources into account has still to be implemented in Germany. The presented algorithm includes an immediate laparotomy in hemodynamically unstable patients as damage control surgery followed by a second look procedure after 48 h. Hemodynamically stable patients should primarily undergo diagnostic laparoscopy and be treated by early total care surgery, depending on the clinical and diagnostic imaging findings. Patients without clinical symptoms or pathological findings in imaging studies should be treated according to SNOM with close clinical controls.

Case report of bilateral penetrating renal trauma caused by a wooden stick

RATIONALE

Kidney is the most frequently injured organ of the genitourinary system during trauma. Bilateral penetrating renal trauma (BPRT) is extremely rare and sporadically reported in the previous literature. Here, we reported a unique case of BPRT.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 43-year-old man, with no medical history, was accidentally penetrated by a wooden stick and presented with sharp pain in the left flank.

DIAGNOSIS

Laboratory tests revealed microscopic hematuria, mildly elevated leucocyte and amylase, normal hemoglobin (145 g/L) and creatinine (1.05 mg/dl). Computed tomography demonstrated bilateral penetrating renal injuries with perinephric/subcapsular hematoma, fracture of the second lumbar vertebra and 10th rib.

INTERVENTIONS

An emergency exploratory laparotomy was executed immediately. According to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale grading system, grade V and III injuries were considered for the left and right kidney, respectively. Nephrectomy and renorrhaphy were performed on the left and right kidney, respectively.

OUTCOMES

The postoperative course was uneventful. Eleven days after the surgery, the patient discharged with no complications.

LESSONS

We present a rare and challenging case which was handled successfully, and it may provide useful information for the management of BPRT.

Management of renal injury in a UK major trauma centre

Introduction

This study reviews the type, severity, management and follow-up of renal trauma presenting to a major trauma centre in the northwest of England in the four years following inception of the major trauma centre. Given the recent introduction of major trauma centres nationally, research is needed within every specialty to ensure that the centralisation of services benefits all patients affected by these changes.

Methods

Patients presenting to Aintree University Hospital with renal trauma between June 2012 and June 2016 were identified using the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) database. The data gathered retrospectively for each patient included mechanism of injury, injury severity score, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grading, management of injury, and follow-up.

Results

Out of a total of 2595 trauma patients, 33 renal injuries were identified. The 31 patients who received imaging were classified according to AAST grading, with 8 Grade I (25.8%), 4 Grade II (12.9%), 8 Grade III (25.8%), 4 Grade IV (12.9%), and 7 Grade V (22.6%) injuries. Twenty-five out of the 30 surviving patients received conservative treatment, three patients received angioembolisation (AE), one patient received a laparotomy with renal suturing, and one patient required a nephrectomy. Of these 30 surviving patients, seven received urology follow-up in clinic (23%).

Conclusion

The findings appear to support the growing trend towards the conservative management of high-grade renal injuries, and provide further evidence for the value of AE in renal trauma. The success of AE in this study appears to support the centralisation of services in renal trauma; however, the low nephrectomy rate could be interpreted as suggestive of the opposite. The study revealed that improvements to follow-up are needed, and that further research should seek to inform the optimal radiological follow-up of high-grade renal injury.

Traumatic renal injury in a UK major trauma centre - current management strategies and the role of early re-imaging

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the contemporary management of renal injuries in a UK major trauma centre and to evaluate the utility and value of re-imaging.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The prospectively maintained 'Trauma Audit and Research Network' database was interrogated to identify patients with urinary tract injuries between January 2014 and December 2017. Patients' records and imaging were reviewed to identify injury grades, interventions, outcomes, and follow-up.

RESULTS

Renal injury was identified in 90 patients (79 males and 11 females). The mean (sd; range) age was 35.5 (17.4; 1.5-94) years. Most of the renal traumas were caused by blunt mechanisms (74%). The overall severity of injuries was: 18 (20%) Grade I, 19 (21%) Grade II, 27 (30%) Grade III, 22 (24%) Grade IV, and four (4%) Grade V. Most patients (84%) were managed conservatively. Early intervention (<24 h) was performed in 14 patients (16%) for renal injuries. Most of these patients were managed by interventional radiology techniques (nine of 14). Only two patients required an emergency nephrectomy, both of whom died from extensive polytrauma. In all, 19 patients underwent laparotomy for other injuries and did not require renal exploration. The overall 30-day mortality was 13%. Re-imaging was performed in 66% of patients at an average time of 3.4 days from initial scan. The majority of re-imaging was planned (49 patients) and 12% of these scans demonstrated a relevant finding (urinoma, pseudoaneurysm) that altered management in three of the 49 patients (6.1%).

CONCLUSION

Non-operative management is the mainstay for all grades of injury. Haemodynamic instability and persistent urine leak are primary indications for intervention. Open surgical management is uncommon. Repeat imaging after injury is advocated for stable patients with high-grade renal injuries (Grade III-V), although more research is needed to determine the optimal timing.

Penetrating Renal Trauma: Nonoperative Management is Safe in Selected Patients

Present literature seems to support the nonoperative management of penetrating renal trauma although data remain limited. We conducted a nine-year retrospective review of nonoperative versus operative management and mechanism of injury [stab wound (SW) versus gunshot wound (GSW)] among patients admitted with penetrating renal trauma. Of 203 patients, the median age was 24 years, with the majority being male and having GSW injuries. More than half (52.2%) were treated nonoperatively (69.9% of SW and 40% of GSW injured patients). When compared with all operative patients combined, nonoperative patients had a lower median Injury Severity Score (17 vs 26, P < 0.001), lower transfusion requirement (27.4% vs 77.3%, P < 0.001), shorter median hospital stay (4.7 vs 12.6 days, P < 0.001), and lower mortality (1.9% vs 13.4%, P = 0.002). Gunshot wound patients had a higher median Injury Severity Score (26 vs 14, P < 0.001), higher median American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Score (3 vs 2, P = 0.001), greater need for transfusion (69.2% vs 29.3%, P < 0.001), longer median hospital length of stay (12.1 vs 3.9 days, P < 0.001), and greater mortality (12.5% vs 0%, P < 0.001) than SW patients. Nonoperative management of penetrating renal injury is safe in selected patients. In addition, renal GSW injuries are associated with a greater morbidity and mortality.